Few things in human experience ring with full Shakespearean sound and fury as does war, and yesterday Trump finally launched his imperial conquest and colonial dominion of Venezuela to steal her oil wealth.
This will continue to be a major story, as it both damages and challenges the international rule of law and the limits of Constitutional authority of the President, but its really as simple as this; theft of the national resources of a foreign nation as regime change.
For us the question is how to respond to this deliberate provocation, but with months of warning as the Trump regime staged pretext murders of peasant fishermen in acts of piracy and crimes against humanity on the high seas, we have had opportunity to develop multilayered and precise plans for all possible alternatives and contingencies and are now prepared to fight a multipolar global war to stop the imperial conquest and dominion of the world by the mad criminal Trump regime of the Fourth Reich before it gathers force and momentum. This is true in both America and Venezuela, but also in the many other nations who see themselves on the menu.
This will not be Trump’s “last territorial demand” as his role model Hitler said in his speech of September 26 1938 when he seized the Sudentenland of Czechoslovakia, and all humankind well remembers what happened next.
Such is the future Age of Tyrants we fight to prevent swallowing us all.
The role of Resistance and revolutionary struggle within the context of political, diplomatic, legal, economic, and cultural warfare is to reinforce all of these efforts and delegitimation of the enemy and bringing a Reckoning to the enemy through sabotage and direct action with one goal; to make the Conquest unprofitable. Trump has chosen this path to win a payout from the oil barons, financiers, and hegemonic elites whose wealth, power, and privilege he serves, and as Lois McMaster Bujold’s fictional character Miles Vorkosigan says; “We’re going to hit them in the paycheck”.
Let us strike throughout the infrastructure of the whole oil mining and shipping system to prevent the natural resources of a nation from financing its own colonization.
And one cannot call a thing a Revolution unless its aimed to destroy the oppressor class, and so leave to any oil baron or other beneficiary or co-conspirator in these crimes no place of refuge or moment of security anywhere on earth.
These are the terms of struggle Trump has set by his crimes, and this is the ground of struggle on which we must now fight. Krig pa kniven, War to the Knife, among the few phrases which come into modern English unchanged from Old Norse; and what it means for us is that an enemy who respects no laws and no limits may hide behind none.
Offer no target, give no warning, leave no trace.
Good luck and good hunting, friends. And Bella Ciao, fascists.
As I wrote in my post of November 24 2025, Manufactured Crises As Fig Leaves of Tyranny and Imperial Conquest and Dominion: the Case of Trump’s War on Venezuela; The Trump regime, fascist, aberrant, cruel, and kleptocratic as always, and a Wilderness of Mirrors made of lies, illusions, propaganda, lunatic conspiracy theories and alternate realities, falsifications which capture, distort, commodify and dehumanize us all, has now deployed an invented criminal syndicate as a mirage and casus belli for the imperial conquest and dominion of Venezuela as regime change and colonial theft of her vast oil resources, the one strategic asset which grants control and hegemony over everything else, throughout the world.
In many ways it is an ideal claim, for a nonexistent threat which cannot be proved also cannot be disproven, much like its model the Nazi claim of a “Jewish conspiracy”. We can no more prove any claim for which no evidence exists because it is wholly specious, nothing but nightmares of reason and fairy dust, nor disprove a negative case such as “prove you are not a Jew”, a communist, anything construed as an enemy of the state; but this does not mean such claims are not dangerous. One may watch the new film on Nuremberg to see precisely where such things lead.
Thus far Trump’s mad quest to centralize all authority to himself from the state and to steal Venezuela’s oil wealth using war on drugs as a pretext has fewer than a hundred penniless fishermen as its victims, but with massive naval forces poised to rain death and destruction on the nation’s cities the scale of such war crimes may be about to become horrifically generalized.
Let us meet this threat on its own ground of struggle, with a Pan-American Strategy of Resistance and solidarity in liberation struggle for the independence, self-determination, and sovereignty of all human beings and for our universal human rights as guarantors of each other’s humanity both here in the colonialist-imperial United States now captured by a Fourth Reich of white supremacist terror, theocratic patriarchal sexual terror, and amoral capitalist kleptocratic terror committed to the subversion of democracy, and throughout the region of the North and South American continents which it claims as its dominion.
The fleet of conquest now poised to eat the heart of Venezuela may be an unstoppable force, but the tyranny which commands it is vulnerable to disobedience, and like Jacob wrestling the angel our mission is not to defeat it, for like much in life it is more powerful than we, but we do not need to; we need only remain undefeated by it. In this great struggle against systems of oppression and carceral states of force and control our victory is to be Unconquered in refusal to submit or to abandon our humanity and duty of car for each other, and this is a kind of victory which can never be taken from us.
As the battle cry of the Spanish Civil War and its glorious International Brigades goes, No Pasaran, friends.
First, the situation now.
As written by David Smith and Tiago Rogero in The Guardian, in an article entitled Trump says US will ‘run’ Venezuela after Nicolás Maduro captured and taken to New York: Audacious US military operation plucks leader Nicolás Maduro from power and removed him from the country; “The US attacked Venezuela and captured its long-serving president Nicolás Maduro on Saturday, with Donald Trump promising to put the country under American control for now, even as Venezuelan officials vowed defiance.
As part of a dramatic overnight operation that knocked out electricity in parts of Caracas, US Special Forces captured Maduro in or near one of his safe houses, Trump said.
With Maduro in US custody, “we will run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition”, the US president said during a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.
“We can’t take a chance that someone else takes over Venezuela who doesn’t have the interests of Venezuelans in mind.”
Trump hailed the attack – in which the New York Times reported at least 40 people, including civilians and soldiers, died – as “an assault like people have not seen since world war two”.
A plane carrying Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, landed in upstate New York on Saturday evening, multiple news outlets reported.
Maduro, in US custody hours after being seized from his Caracas compound in a US raid, landed at Stewart air national guard base after 4.30pm in a white Boeing 757. He was expected to be taken by helicopter to New York City, where he will be processed and transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center prison, officials told NBC News.
They said the Venezuela president was set to appear in court by Monday evening.
The dramatic intervention in Caracas was condemned by Democrats on Capitol Hill and several leaders around the world as the most dangerous example of US imperialism since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Trump, who campaigned for the presidency with a promise to end foreign wars, did nothing to quell those fears when he told reporters that the US would be temporarily seizing control of Venezuela and its oil infrastructure.
Maduro, a 63-year-old former bus driver handpicked by the dying Hugo Chávez to succeed him in 2013, has accused the US of seeking to take control of his nation’s oil reserves, the biggest in the world.
At his press conference, Trump said: “We’re going to have our very large US oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country and we are ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so.”
It remained unclear how Trump plans to administer Venezuela. Despite the overnight operation that knocked out electricity in part of Caracas and captured Maduro in or near one of his safe houses, US forces have no control over the country itself, and Maduro’s government appears to still be in charge.
Trump said the US would run Venezuela “with a group” and would be “designating various people” in charge while pointing to the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio; the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth; and the joint chiefs of staff chair, Gen Dan “Razin” Caine, behind him.
He failed to elaborate but said he was open to the idea of sending US forces into Venezuela. “We’re not afraid of boots on the ground if we have to have. We had boots on the ground last night at a very high level, actually. We’re not afraid of it. We don’t mind saying it but we’re going to make sure that country is run properly. We’re not doing this in vain,” the president said.
A US occupation “won’t cost us a penny” because the US would be reimbursed from the “money coming out of the ground”, Trump said, referring to Venezuela’s oil reserves.
But the remarks are likely to cause consternation among some of Trump’s die-hard supporters who, haunted by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, have embraced his “America first” commitment to stop sending troops to fight and die abroad.
Trump also said Rubio had been in touch with the Venezuelan vice-president, Delcy Rodriíguez, who was reportedly sworn in after Maduro’s capture. “‘We’ll do whatever you need,’” Trump quoted Rodriguez as saying. “She really doesn’t have a choice,” he added.
But a few hours later, the president’s claim was undermined by Rodríguez, who, in a televised address, maintained the critical tone adopted by all members of Maduro’s cabinet since the first reports of the US bombardment.
She described the US attack as an “unprecedented military aggression”, and demanded the “immediate release” of Maduro and his wife. The Venezuelan people “are outraged by the illegal and illegitimate kidnapping of the president and the first lady”, Rodríguez said.
The Venezuelan vice-president insisted that the country “will never again be anyone’s colony – neither of old empires, nor of new empires, nor of empires in decline”.
She also echoed an argument repeatedly made by Maduro before his capture: that the real objective of the four-month-long US military pressure had never been a supposed “war on drugs”, but rather “regime change” and the “seizure of our energy, mineral and natural resources”.
Venezuela’s supreme court late on Saturday ordered vice president Rodríguez, to become the country’s interim leader.
At his earlier press conference earlier, Trump said he “understood she was just sworn in” as Venezuela’s new president. Rodríguez, however, repeatedly stressed that Maduro “is the only president of Venezuela. There is only one president in this country, and his name is Nicolás Maduro Moros.”
Maduro was indicted in US federal court in 2020 on narco-terrorism and other charges for running what prosecutors called a scheme to send tons of cocaine to the US through an alleged Cartel de los Soles. He has always denied the allegations.
In the run-up to the attack, Trump had sought a blockade of Venezuelan oil and expanded sanctions against the Maduro government, and staged more than two dozen strikes on vessels the US alleges were involved in trafficking drugs, killing more than 110 people.
At around 2am on Saturday, explosions rocked Caracas with blasts, aircraft and black smoke seen for about 90 minutes. The Venezuelan government said the attacks also took place in the states of Miranda, Aragua and La Guaira.
The operation involved a joint force of over 150 aircraft and special operations teams, and was executed without any US casualties or loss of equipment. The apprehension force arrived at Maduro’s compound and came under fire, replying with “overwhelming force”. Maduro was captured while attempting to reach a steel-reinforced safe room but was unable to close the door in time.
Maduro and his wife had been whisked by helicopters to the USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault ship in the Caribbean, before their transfer to New York. Trump posted a photo on social media appearing to show Maduro wearing a sweatsuit and blindfold on board the USS Iwo Jima. The couple arrived at the Stewart international airport in New Windsor, New York, late on Saturday afternoon.
The US has not made such a direct intervention in its backyard region since the invasion of Panama 36 years ago that, to the day, led to the surrender and seizure of leader Manuel Noriega over similar allegations.
Venezuela’s ruling “Chavismo” movement, named for Maduro’s revered predecessor Chávez, said civilians and military personnel died in Saturday’s strikes but did not give figures.
The opposition, headed by recent Nobel peace prize winner María Corina Machado, had no immediate comment but has said for 18 months that it won the 2024 election and has a democratic right to take power.
But Trump said Machado didn’t have the “support within or the respect within the country” when he was asked if she would be a potential interim leader now.
Saturday’s press conference in Florida struck a triumphalist tone. Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, said: “Nicolás Maduro had his chance, just like Iran had their chance – until they didn’t and until he didn’t. He effed around and he found out.”
Rubio insisted that it had been impractical to inform Congress of such a delicate operation in advance. But Democrats roundly condemned the intervention. Chuck Schumer, the minority leader in the Senate, said: “The idea that Trump plans to now run Venezuela should strike fear in the hearts of all Americans. The American people have seen this before and paid the devastating price.”
Bernie Sanders, an independent senator for Vermont, said Trump and his administration “have spoken openly about controlling Venezuela’s oil reserves, the largest in the world. This is rank imperialism. It recalls the darkest chapters of US interventions in Latin America, which have left a terrible legacy. It will and should be condemned by the democratic world.”
Venezuelan allies Russia, Cuba and Iran were quick to criticize the strikes as a violation of sovereignty. Argentina’s president, Javier Milei, lauded Venezuela’s new “freedom”, while Mexico condemned the intervention and Brazil’s president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said it crossed “an unacceptable line”.”
As written by William Christou in The Guardian, in an article entitled Why has the US attacked Caracas and captured Venezuela’s president? Trump’s unprecedented capture of Nicolás Maduro follows months of military campaign and years of strained relationship; “Overnight on Friday, the US carried out airstrikes across Venezuela, with explosions rocking the capital, Caracas, before dawn. Shortly afterwards, Donald Trump announced that US forces had captured the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, and flown them out of the country.
The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, said they would face trial in New York on charges of involvement in narco-terrorism. A fresh indictment was issued on Saturday.
Trump later posted a picture on his Truth Social platform with the caption “Nicolas Maduro on board the USS Iwo Jima”
The stunning attack and unprecedented capture of a sitting president follow months of an intense US pressure campaign against Venezuela. Since September, the US navy has amassed a huge fleet off the Venezuelan coast and carried out airstrikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific and seized Venezuelan oil tankers. At least 110 people have been killed in the strikes on boats, which human rights groups say could amount to war crimes.
It was the largest, most direct US action in Latin America since the 1989 Panama invasion. The lightning operation stunned the international community, allies and adversaries of the US alike, which were taken aback by the brazen interference in a foreign country.
At a Mar-a-Lago news conference, Trump said that the US would “run the country” until a leadership transition can take place, and that US oil companies would go into Venezuela, bragging that “no nation in the world could achieve what America achieved”.
The bombardment of Venezuela and the capture of Maduro is a serious and dramatic escalation of the US campaign. The future of Venezuela’s ruling regime remains uncertain. Despite Trump’s statements that the US will decide the fate of the country, the Venezuelan military appears to remain in control of the country and its military assets.
How did we get here?
Since Trump took office for his second term, he has put Maduro squarely in his sights, pursuing a maximum pressure campaign against the Venezuelan regime. He accused Maduro of being behind destabilising activity in the Americas, including drug trafficking and illegal immigration to the US. In July, the US announced a $50m (£37m) bounty on Maduro’s head, accusing him of being one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world.
Trump’s administration declared Venezuelan gangs such as Tren de Aragua as terrorist organisations and began carrying out airstrikes against alleged drug traffickers in the Caribbean Sea. Soon, the US began to seize Venezuelan tankers and build up its military presence in the waters surrounding the South American country.
Trump has openly flirted with the idea of regime change in Venezuela. In late November, Trump gave Maduro an ultimatum to relinquish power, offering him safe passage out of the country. Maduro refused the offer, telling supporters in Venezuela that he did not want “a slave’s peace” and accusing the US of wanting control of his country’s oil reserves.
As the Trump administration ratcheted up the pressure, the government in Caracas at times seemed bewildered. Maduro repeatedly said Venezuela did not want war with the US, at one point dancing in front of Venezuelan students to the lyrics, “no war, yes peace” and mimicking Trump’s double-fist pumping dance move. On Thursday, two days before his capture, Maduro said in a televised interview he would welcome US investment in the country’s oil sector.
Why are the US and Venezuela at odds?
Relations between the US and Venezuela have been strained since Hugo Chávez became the president in 1999. A self-professed socialist and anti-imperialist, Chávez angered the US in his opposition to its invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as his alliances with countries such as Cuba and Iran. Relations further spiralled after Chávez accused the US of backing a 2002 coup attempt.
To many in the US, particularly in the more hawkish wing of the Republican party, the socialist ideological orientation of Venezuela’s government has made it a natural adversary of the US, alongside its ally Cuba.
As Chávez consolidated power, punished political opponents and expropriated much of the country’s private sector, the US condemned Venezuela for its poor human rights record. Despite occasional minor thaws in relations between the two countries over the years, the relationship has continued to deteriorate, especially after Maduro took power in 2013.
Under the Trump administration, the US has portrayed the Maduro government as illegitimate, recognising Juan Guaidó, the speaker of the parliament, as Venezuela’s president in 2019.
In July 2024, Maduro appeared to suffer a landslide defeat in the presidential election, amid widespread anger at his increasingly authoritarian rule and Venezuela’s economic collapse. The Biden administration recognised the opposition candidate Edmundo González as the victor. Detailed voting data released by the opposition and verified by independent experts indicated that González had won the vote, but Maduro clung to power after launching a ferocious crackdown.
In early December, the Trump administration published what it called the “Trump corollary”, which said that the western hemisphere must be controlled by the US politically, economically, commercially and militarily. As part of the new Trump doctrine, the US military can be used to gain access to energy and mineral resources in the area.
During a press conference hours after the capture of Maduro, Trump invoked the 19th-century Monroe doctrine, which was used to assert US military power in Latin America. Dubbing it the “Don-Roe doctrine”, he said: “American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again.”
Who is Nicolás Maduro and why did Trump capture him?
Maduro has been the president of Venezuela since 2013. The former bus driver rose to prominence under Chávez, working as his minister of foreign affairs before becoming the country’s president after Chávez’s death.
Maduro’s rule is considered dictatorial, with the UN estimating in 2019 that more than 20,000 Venezuelans were killed in extrajudicial executions. Key institutions, such as the judiciary, have been eroded under Maduro and the rule of law has deteriorated. Relations with the US have also suffered under his rule.
Over recent months, Trump has repeatedly called for the ousting of Maduro, accusing him of sending drugs and criminals into the US – a claim experts have said lacks evidence. He also claimed that Maduro was stealing US oil.
Despite months of escalating rhetoric, Saturday’s capture of the sitting president arrived without warning and Venezuelan authorities seemed to have been caught off guard by the brazen operation.
What happens next?
The future is uncertain. Venezuela’s defence minister has vowed to fight on and has called on citizens to unite to resist the foreign “invasion”, calling resistance to the US a “fight for freedom”.
Though Maduro has been captured, Venezuela’s institutions and military appear to be intact. It is unclear if Saturday’s attack on Venezuela was the beginning of a wider conflict or a one-off operation, as Trump said the US retains the right for further military operations in the country. Venezuelan opposition leaders, chief among them the Nobel peace prize winner María Corina Machado, have called for Trump to help support an uprising in the country.
What is clear is that the US is determined to play a large role in Venezuela, through the use of military force or otherwise. Trump said on Saturday it will be the US that will be making decisions on what is next for Venezuela.
“We can’t take a chance in letting somebody else run and just take over what he left, or left off,” Trump said. He added that the US is thinking over whether Machado will take over, but said for now, the Venezuelan vice-president is in charge.
It was unclear what exactly Trump meant when he said the US would run Venezuela, as there were no signs that the US had taken over the capital and the Venezuelan soldiers remained at their posts at military bases across the country. Trump did not rule out US military boots on the ground, but said that Venezuelan officials were agreeable to his demands – a sharp contrast to the defiant statements of officials in the hours after Maduro’s capture.
The US has in the past carried out war games to simulate a scenario where Venezuelan leadership was “decapitated”. The simulations predicted prolonged chaos, with refugees pouring out of Venezuela and rival groups fighting one another for control of the country.
“You’d have prolonged chaos … with no clear way out,” Douglas Farah, a Latin America expert who helped run the war games, said.”
As Lenin and Tolstoy asked with such very different consequences for us all; “What is to be done?”
While o’er glancing with but a cursory eye the DSA International Committee’s Venezuela Solidarity working group documents I found this gem, by which to scry the future Trump’s actions in Venezuela have bequeathed us all.
As written by The Likely Consequences of a US War on Venezuela
Posted By Maria Paez Victor On October 20, 2025; “Funny thing about war: it is relatively easy to start. An insult here. A lie there. A “false flag” as a casus belli there, and shots, bombs, missiles ensue…and destruction and deaths follow until there is some sort of “victory”. However, when the odds are stacked against a much smaller opponent that is facing an overwhelmingly larger foe, then “victory” will not appear straightforward, or even clear. It will be messy.
This is the case of Venezuela. The USA thinks its technological superiority will allow it to subdue the Venezuelan government and people: in other words, bomb them into submission. But I would like to point out a few TRUTHS, not the propaganda with which Trump and his gang of thugs surround themselves:
ONE: LEGITIMACY. Despite the attempt to criminalize President Maduro, he is not a dictator. He is a duly elected president in fair elections, witnessed by several hundred international observers, recognized by the UN and most of the countries of the world. As to the criticism that he is “authoritarian”, it’s a vague, undefined insult, unaccompanied by real evidence. For the USA to call President Maduro an authoritarian is also extremely hypocritical. Authoritarian Trump, who directs ICE to attack USA’s own citizens, should be more careful when throwing rocks from his glass house in Florida.
TWO: DRUGS. The supposed reason why the US is committing murder in the high seas (6 boats blown to bits and 27 murders) is its fake accusation that Venezuela is a major source of illegal drugs entering the USA. The real purpose of the US government is regime change, and the assertion of its Monroe Doctrine based illusion of the right to control Latin America. The US government wants a supine, obedient, subservient Venezuela that will hand over its resources to USA interests and obey Washington. Drugs are an easily debunked excuse for aggression. The UN World Drug Report in no uncertain terms states that Venezuela is not a narco-state. Most of the drugs enter the USA by way of the Pacific Ocean – not the Caribbean Sea – through Ecuador, Colombia and Bolivia. The United Nations, the European Union and even the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) consider Venezuela to be free of drug production and processing. The country grows no poppy or coca. Only 5% of Colombian cocaine entering the US passes through Venezuela. Furthermore, the US has not produced a shred of evidence that connects President Maduro with drugs. As to the claim that Venezuela has emptied its prisons and insane asylums into the USA, that accusation is so preposterous that it deserves only scorn.
THREE: OIL. Venezuela is located on top of the world’s largest oil reserves, larger even than those of Saudi Arabia. Trump openly said in his first term as president that he wants Venezuelan oil and believes the US should just take it. It is obvious that these 26-years of aggression against Venezuela is because the US wants complete control of its oil for its corporations. It does not want to buy the oil, but to own it. The uncle of one of the six Trinidadians recently blown up by a US warship on the pretense of drug smuggling stated in plain language what is obvious to all: “I just want to know why Donald Trump is killing poor people… He’s going after peoples riches and killing poor people, children.” (The Guardian, 17 Oct. 2025)
FOUR: PEOPLE. The great majority of Venezuelans support the president and government, and in face of US warships in the Caribbean, their popularity increased exponentially. All the political parties and grass roots groups in the country are united in defending the nation. After the US war ships threat, the civil militia that numbered 5 million has now grown to 8 million. As the Vietnam war amply showed, invaders have multiple obstacles and costs when the people are against them. Invaders in Venezuela will not be met with accolades, but with bullets.
FIVE: ARMY. Any military commander or military expert will tell you that the sine qua non, the most essential factor, in any war is the morale of its soldiers, their sense of purpose. Unless soldiers are psychopaths, they need justification for picking up a gun or pushing a button to obliterate other human beings. They need to believe the orders they receive are not only legitimate, but wise and necessary. The Bolivarian Armed Forces of Venezuela, by any standards and the most casual observations, is imbued with the sense of purpose and pride that they are the heirs of the army of Simon Bolívar, the guardians of the Venezuelan people and upholders of the Constitution. When soldiers march through the streets, flowers are thrown at them with shouts of approval. Venezuelans know these soldiers took the oath of Bolivar to never turn their arms against them. The US is extremely foolish to think the Venezuelan army will turn against their own government. The morale of the US forces cannot be very firm: their top leaders have been subjected to an unprecedented, embarrassing, harangue by Trump and his “minister of war”, and the admiral head of the Southern Command has just unexpectedly resigned. Furthermore, the use of US soldiers to “subdue” US citizens, which Trump assures is what is in store for them from now on, has not gone down well with the military. None of this is good for the morale of US soldiers. It will be hard to portray Venezuelans as villains, deserving of bombs and missiles, as they have done no harm to the USA.
SIX: SOLIDARITY. No matter how much the US has tried to isolate the Venezuelan nation with its media demonization, it has utterly failed to do so. Venezuelan diplomacy has been prodigious and successful. Its representative in the United Nations, Samuel Moncada, is Vice-President of the UN General Assembly, a position to which he has been elected twice. The leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement at its meeting of 15 October, decried the US threats against Venezuela as violating the norms of international law and diplomacy, as had CELAC and ALBA. Significantly, the Caribbean nations (with the exception of Granada) have all decried the presence of US warships in the Caribbean, and three key nations Mexico, Colombia and Brazil have all expressed their solidarity with Venezuela and repudiated any invasion by the US. Even Latin American nations not particularly friends of Venezuela reject this colonialist, arrogant interference by the US. Furthermore, the 11 BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia) have expressed their support for Venezuela and against the US war ships in the Caribbean. These mighty US ships showed their bravado by blowing up 6 small open boats with outboard motors, killing 27 unarmed civilians. They should pause and think again before launching a land invasion as Trump has threatened, knowing that both China and Russia have defence agreements with Venezuela. A war in the Caribbean has global implications.
SEVEN: CONDEMNATION. The Latin American countries declared through its organization CELAC that all its member countries have long agreed to maintain Latin America and the Caribbean as a zone of peace, based on principles such as: the prohibition of the threat or use of force, the peaceful settlement of disputes, the promotion of dialogue and multilateralism, unrestricted respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, non-interference in the internal affairs of States and the inalienable right of peoples to self-determination. These are also the fundamental principles of the UN Charter. Human Rights Watch has added its voice in condemning the US war ship attacks as a violation of international law and that they amounted to extrajudicial executions. A main legal issue is that the US is not formally engaged in an armed conflict with Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago. Under human rights law standards, it is officials in law enforcement units such as Coast Guards, that should combat alleged criminal groups and these should seek to minimize injury and preserve human life. They may use lethal force only when strictly unavoidable to protect against an imminent threat of death or serious injury. Blowing them up, with a missile is illegal and one could say, also immoral.
EIGHT: REGIONAL WAR. If the US escalates this aggression into the Venezuelan mainland, there will be a regional response which could turn into a conflict like the Vietnam war: prolonged, with terrible loss of life on either side and very, very costly. Many nations and individuals will come to Venezuela’s aid. US facilities, institutions, properties and even citizens, throughout the region would be marked as “fair game” by an enraged population. Guerilla warfare and spontaneous popular aggression is the defense of the weak and it is mighty hard to control.
Let Trump, his bloodthirsty secretary Rubio – the architect of this mess- and his knucklehead minister of war, ponder on these probable effects of unleashing the dogs of war in Latin America. It will be a messy, protracted, costly war, and all the indicators point that in the end, the US will lose like it did in Vietnam.
Or better still, may the USA citizens stay the hand of their war-lusting president.”
As written by Ben Burgis in Jacobin, in an article entitled The Fake Antiwar Right Goes to War; “In January 2023, J. D. Vance had just arrived in the Senate. One of the first things he did was to pen an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal endorsing Donald Trump for the 2024 presidential nomination. His primary argument was that Trump, “started no wars despite enormous pressure from his own party and even members of his own administration.” This is a “low bar,” he granted, but “that’s a reflection of the hawkishness of Mr. Trump’s predecessors and the foreign-policy establishment they slavishly followed.”
In January 2026, Vance is vice president of the United States, and Trump has carried out regime change in Venezuela. At a press conference this morning, Trump announced an open-ended commitment by the United States to “run Venezuela” until a regime more to our liking could be installed. Vice President Vance took to social media to crow about Trump’s toughness and resolve.
In a follow-up post, he reiterated the accusation of “narco-terrorism” that the Trump/Vance administration spent much of last year trying to push (though with remarkably little public buy-in). What’s truly remarkable, though, is that the vice president is openly and unabashedly saying that part of the casus belli for regime change is reversing the Venezuelan state’s nationalization of the country’s oil industry in 1976, decades before Nicolás Maduro’s predecessor Hugo Chávez was first elected to office.
When George W. Bush invaded Iraq in 2003, many things were the same as they are now. Then, too, the regime being toppled was accused of ties with “terrorism” on the basis of extremely dubious evidence. Then, too, left-wing antiwar protesters faulted a Republican president for waging a “war for oil.”
But the differences are as striking as the similarities. In 2003, those protesters were routinely told they were unserious for tying Bush’s motives to Iraq’s oil reserves. Vice President Dick Cheney wasn’t publicly agreeing with them. And in 2003, the “terrorists” Saddam Hussein was spuriously accused of connections with were al-Qaeda. In 2026, it refers to drug cartels. The new line of scrimmage is that, since Americans die of drug overdoses, running drugs amounts to killing Americans. Taken literally, this would mean that every street corner drug dealer could be treated as a War on Terror “enemy combatant.” In this case, though, Trump and Vance don’t seem to care much if anyone even takes the charge seriously. It’s a kind of placeholder, something to say because they need to say something.
The “cartel” that Maduro is supposed to lead is Cartel de los Soles (“Cartel of the Suns”). The problem is that this isn’t actually the name of a drug cartel. It’s a colloquial term that journalists and think tankers started using in the 1990s, before Chávez even came to office, to describe allegations that drug-running was common in the Venezuelan military. The phrase is a play on the sun insignias on the uniforms of Venezuelan military officers. Even the people who coined the phrase weren’t alleging the existence of a literal, hierarchically organized cartel with a single leader. And the connection to overdose deaths is even stranger. A tiny fraction of the cocaine in the United States seems to come from Venezuela, and apparently none of the fentanyl that actually drives overdose deaths.
Again, though, this is a paper-thin justification. There’s little effort to obscure the reality that this is a raw assertion of American power in part of the world that interventionists have always regarded as “our” right and proper sphere of influence.
The ambition of powerful hawks in the Trump administration like Secretary of State Marco Rubio isn’t just regime change in one country. Rather, like predecessors such as the Dulles brothers who carried out regime change in Guatemala in 1954, or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who bragged about helping overthrow Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973, it’s the eradication of the entire Latin American left, from social democrats in Brazil to communists in Cuba.
In 2003, there was a sustained and serious effort to convince the American public that Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction that he might decide to share with al-Qaeda. In 2025, the effort to convince anyone that Venezuela needed to be conquered to stop “narco-terrorism” causing overdose deaths felt half-hearted. Nor does it seem to have convinced very many Americans. At the end of last month, an Economist/YouGov poll found that only 22 percent of respondents “support the U.S. using military force to overthrow Maduro.” Instead of spending six more months trying to manufacture consent for the operation, the Trump administration decided to just go ahead and do it. The overwhelming impression given by the pronouncements of Trump, Vance, and Rubio is more like, “We’re doing this because we can. Who’s going to stop us?”
Remember that, if American service members start coming home from Caracas in flag-draped coffins. Trump and Vance didn’t even try to sell this as a war of necessity. They just did it because they could.”
Becky G – Bella Ciao (From the Netflix Series “Casa de Papel”)
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1; Fire Catches
Take Action with the Democratic Socialists of America
Hands Off Venezuela Mass Call
Start: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 at 6:00 PM PST
The Fake Antiwar Right Goes to War
Trump says US will ‘run’ Venezuela after Nicolás Maduro captured and taken to New York
‘Naked imperialism’: how Trump intervention in Venezuela is a return to form for the US: Most of the Americas have suffered from interference from their powerful northern neighbour – and are usually the worse off for it
The Guardian view on the new Monroe doctrine: Trump’s forceful approach to the western hemisphere comes at a cost Editorial
Today an illegal coup in Venezuela, but where next? Donald Trump talks peace but he is a man of war Simon Tisdall
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/03/illegal-coup-venezuela-donald-trump-peace-war
US Starts 2026 by Bombing Venezuela and Kidnapping Its President, Setting a Tone of Imperialist Violence for the Year
Global outcry after US launches strikes on Venezuela and captures president
France, Russia, China and EU say Washington broke international law after US troops carried out the operation
Airstrikes, helicopters and a snatch squad with a blowtorch: how the US raid on Caracas unfolded
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/caracas-on-edge-in-aftermath-of-us-blitz-venezuela
Is there any legal justification for the US attack on Venezuela?
Delcy Rodríguez strikes defiant tone but must walk tightrope as Venezuela’s interim leader
After Trump’s illegal Venezuela coup, there are two dangers: he is emboldened, but has no clue what comes next, Rajan Menon
Today, Trump’s target was Caracas. What tomorrow?
Stephen Wertheim
US attack on Venezuela raises fears of future Greenland takeover
‘Venezuela helped us a lot’: US’s capture of Nicolás Maduro stirs anxiety in Cuba
What role could the US play in Venezuela’s ‘bust’ oil industry?
Trump’s attack on Venezuela without alerting Congress tests limits of executive power, Robert Tait
European leaders appear torn in face of new world order after Venezuela attack, Patrick Wintour
Spanish
4 de enero de 2025: Trump desata los perros de la guerra para colonizar Venezuela y robar su petróleo
Pocas cosas en la experiencia humana resuenan con la intensidad y la furia shakespearianas como la guerra, y ayer Trump finalmente lanzó su conquista imperial y dominio colonial sobre Venezuela para robar su riqueza petrolera.
Esta seguirá siendo una noticia de gran relevancia, ya que daña y desafía el estado de derecho internacional y los límites de la autoridad constitucional del Presidente, pero en realidad es tan simple como esto: el robo de los recursos nacionales de una nación extranjera mediante un cambio de régimen.
Para nosotros, la pregunta es cómo responder a esta provocación deliberada, pero con meses de advertencia, ya que el régimen de Trump orquestó asesinatos de pescadores campesinos como pretexto, en actos de piratería y crímenes de lesa humanidad en alta mar, hemos tenido la oportunidad de desarrollar planes precisos y multifacéticos para todas las alternativas y contingencias posibles, y ahora estamos preparados para librar una guerra global multipolar para detener la conquista imperial y el dominio del mundo por parte del régimen criminal y demente de Trump, el Cuarto Reich, antes de que gane fuerza e impulso. Esto es cierto tanto en Estados Unidos como en Venezuela, pero también en muchas otras naciones que se ven amenazadas.
Esta no será la “última demanda territorial” de Trump, como dijo su modelo a seguir, Hitler, en su discurso del 26 de septiembre de 1938, cuando se apoderó de los Sudetes de Checoslovaquia, y toda la humanidad recuerda bien lo que sucedió después.
Tal es la futura Era de los Tiranos que luchamos por evitar que nos devore a todos.
El papel de la Resistencia y la lucha revolucionaria en el contexto de la guerra política, diplomática, legal, económica y cultural es reforzar todos estos esfuerzos y la deslegitimación del enemigo, y hacer que el enemigo rinda cuentas mediante el sabotaje y la acción directa con un solo objetivo: hacer que la conquista no sea rentable. Trump ha elegido este camino para obtener beneficios de los barones del petróleo, los financieros y las élites hegemónicas a cuya riqueza, poder y privilegios sirve, y como dice el personaje ficticio de Lois McMaster Bujold, Miles Vorkosigan: “Vamos a golpearles donde más les duele: en el bolsillo”.
Ataquemos toda la infraestructura del sistema de extracción y transporte de petróleo para evitar que los recursos naturales de una nación financien su propia colonización. Y no se puede llamar a algo Revolución a menos que tenga como objetivo destruir la clase opresora, y así no dejar ningún lugar de refugio ni un solo momento de seguridad en la Tierra para ningún magnate petrolero ni otro beneficiario o cómplice de estos crímenes.
Estos son los términos de la lucha que Trump ha impuesto con sus crímenes, y este es el terreno de lucha en el que ahora debemos combatir. Guerra a muerte, una de las pocas frases que han llegado al inglés moderno sin cambios desde el nórdico antiguo; y lo que significa para nosotros es que un enemigo que no respeta leyes ni límites no puede esconderse detrás de nada.
No ofrezcas ningún objetivo, no des ninguna advertencia, no dejes rastro.
Buena suerte y buena caza, amigos. Y Bella Ciao, fascistas.
24 de noviembre de 2025. Crisis fabricadas como hojas de parra de la tiranía y la conquista y el dominio imperial: el caso de la guerra de Trump contra Venezuela.
El régimen de Trump, fascista, aberrante, cruel y cleptocrático como siempre, y un desierto de espejos hecho de mentiras, ilusiones, propaganda, teorías conspirativas lunáticas y realidades alternativas, falsificaciones que nos capturan, distorsionan, mercantilizan y deshumanizan a todos, ha desplegado una organización criminal inventada como espejismo y casus belli para la conquista y el dominio imperial de Venezuela, como cambio de régimen y robo colonial de sus vastos recursos petroleros, el único activo estratégico que otorga control y hegemonía sobre todo lo demás, en todo el mundo.
En muchos sentidos, es una afirmación ideal, ya que una amenaza inexistente que no se puede probar ni refutar, al igual que su modelo, la afirmación nazi de una “conspiración judía”. Ya no podemos probar ninguna afirmación sin pruebas, por ser completamente engañosa, meras pesadillas de la razón y polvo de hadas, ni refutar un argumento negativo como “demuestra que no eres judío”, comunista o cualquier cosa que se interprete como enemigo del Estado; pero esto no significa que tales afirmaciones no sean peligrosas. Se puede ver la nueva película sobre Núremberg para ver con precisión adónde conducen estas cosas.
Hasta ahora, el descabellado intento de Trump por centralizar toda la autoridad del Estado y robar la riqueza petrolera de Venezuela usando la guerra contra las drogas como pretexto ha tenido como víctimas a menos de cien pescadores sin dinero, pero con enormes fuerzas navales listas para sembrar muerte y destrucción sobre las ciudades del país, la escala de tales crímenes de guerra podría estar a punto de generalizarse de forma horrorosa. Enfrentemos esta amenaza en su propio terreno de lucha, con una Estrategia Panamericana de Resistencia y solidaridad en la lucha de liberación por la independencia, la autodeterminación y la soberanía de todos los seres humanos, y por nuestros derechos humanos universales como garantes de la humanidad de cada uno, tanto aquí en el Estados Unidos colonialista-imperial, ahora capturado por un Cuarto Reich de terror supremacista blanco, terror sexual patriarcal teocrático y terror cleptocrático capitalista amoral, comprometido con la subversión de la democracia, como en toda la región de los continentes norteamericano y sudamericano que reclama como su dominio.
La flota de la conquista, ahora lista para devorar el corazón de Venezuela, puede ser una fuerza imparable, pero la tiranía que la domina es vulnerable a la desobediencia, y como Jacob luchando contra el ángel, nuestra misión no es derrotarla, pues, como muchas cosas en la vida, es más poderosa que nosotros, pero no necesitamos hacerlo; solo necesitamos permanecer invictos ante ella. En esta gran lucha contra los sistemas de opresión y los estados carcelarios de fuerza y control, nuestra victoria reside en permanecer invictos, negándonos a someternos o a abandonar nuestra humanidad y nuestro deber de cuidarnos los unos a los otros, y esta es una victoria que jamás nos podrán arrebatar.
Como reza el grito de batalla de la Guerra Civil Española y sus gloriosas Brigadas Internacionales: «No pasaran, amigos».
November 24 2025 Manufactured Crises As Fig Leaves of Tyranny and Imperial Conquest and Dominion: the Case of Trump’s War on Venezuela
October 23 2025 Trump’s Undeclared War on Venezuela
August 11 2024 When Must Revolution Be Waged Against Revolution? The Case of Venezuela
Venezuela, a reading list
Things Are Never So Bad That They Can’t Get Worse: Inside the Collapse of Venezuela, William Neuman
We Created Chávez: A People’s History of the Venezuelan Revolution,
Geo Maher
Comandante: Hugo Chávez’s Venezuela, Rory Carroll
The Magical State: Nature, Money, and Modernity in Venezuela, Fernando Coronil
The Plot to Overthrow Venezuela: How the US Is Orchestrating a Coup for Oil,
Dan Kovalik, foreword by Oliver Stone
Corporate Coup: Venezuela and the End of US Empire, Anya Parampil

