August 10 2024 Where Do We Go From Here? A New Bangladesh Rises

     Among the first things a successful revolution needs, once the tyrants have been cast down from their thrones and power seized by the people, is a Committee of Public Safety like the one founded in 1793 and led by Robespierre as liberator and champion of the people, so that the people can be defended from forces of reaction. It’s the first priority of mine after establishing an Autonomous Zone, and its lack is the reason why our first Autonomous Zone, the Capital Hill AZ founded in Seattle on June 8 2020, failed under attack by organizations of fascist terror and their police and Homeland Security partners in the state repression of dissent. And it is a mistake I have never made again.

    Interdependent with universalization of the people’s power once it has been seized is the creation of institutions which balance power among ourselves and guarantee our parallel rights as citizens and our universal human rights in a free society of equals. What does this mean? In the context of a victorious revolution, and the total reimagination and transformation of society and how we choose to be human together which it brings, I mean and give warning that we must not become the tyrants we have overthrown.

     This is a predictable phase of revolutionary struggle, especially in anticolonial revolutions like the one which birthed the despicable Hasina regime as an historical echo, and a consequence of the imposed conditions of struggle. Yet knowing so, it can be avoided.

     Let us send no armies to enforce virtue.

       As we are taught with the lyrics of the song Where Do We Go From Here?, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode 7 of season 6, Once More With Feeling, possibly the greatest musical episode of any telenovela yet created;

    “Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

The battle’s done,

And we kinda won.

So we sound our victory cheer.

Where do we go from here.

Why is the path unclear,

When we know home is near.

Understand we’ll go hand in hand,

But we’ll walk alone in fear. (Tell me)

Tell me where do we go from here.

When does the end appear,

When do the trumpets cheer.

The curtains close, on a kiss god knows,

We can tell the end is near…

Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

Where do we go

from here?”

     Yet hope remains when all is lost, and whether it becomes a gift or a curse is in our hands. These lyrics speak of the modern pathology of disconnectedness, of the division and fracture of our Solidarity, of subjugation through learned helplessness and the dominion of fear. But this is not the end of the story, nor of ours.

     Once More With Feeling ends not with abjection, but with The Kiss, between the Slayer and Spike, one of the monsters she hunts. A very particular kind of monster, who is also the hero of the story in its entire seven year arc; one who is made monstrous by his condition of being and forces beyond his control, against which he struggles for liberation and to recreate and define himself as he chooses, a monster who reclaims his humanity and his soul. This is why we continue to watch the show twenty years after its debut; we are all Spike, locked in titanic struggle for the ownership of ourselves with authorized identities and systemic evils, a revolution of truths written in our flesh against imposed conditions of struggle and orders of human being, meaning, and value.

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer is an allegory of Sartrean freedom in a world without inherent value or meaning, of the joy of total freedom versus the terror of our nothingness, and above all a song of the redemptive power of love to return to us our true selves.

      This is how we defeat fascist tyranny in the long game, after we bring a Reckoning for its crimes against humanity and its subversion of democracy; let us answer hate with love, division with solidarity, fear with hope, and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world. 

     As written in The Observer by Redwan Ahmed and Kaamil Ahmed, in an article entitled ‘We’re freed, but it doesn’t end here’: Bangladeshis mix hope with vigilance after PM flees; “The relief in Dhaka was palpable. “It feels good that finally we have educated people running our government,” said Zahin Ferdous, a 19-year-old university student, referring to the new interim government led by the Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus.

    Ferdous was conducting traffic in Bangladesh’s capital, one of the volunteers trying to restore normality to the city after a tumultuous week that has transformed Bangladesh.

     The resignation of prime minister Sheikh Hasina on Monday initially caused a city-wide street party. But it was swiftly followed by looting and reprisal attacks against her supporters and the police. These have somewhat calmed since Thursday, when Yunus was sworn in.

     But in a city of 20 million people, that calm is eerie, born out of a feeling of uncertainty. Neighbourhoods have established nightwatches, reports of suspicious activity are being swapped on Facebook groups and, in the wealthier districts, car headlamps are being left on at night to light up the road. Ferdous added: “I have huge respect for him [Yunus] and now I just hope he delivers. My biggest fear is for him to become just like the other politicians.”

     As Yunus returned to Bangladesh to lead the country, having a week earlier been under threat of imprisonment, he called for an end to violence and protection for minorities. And with police still absent from the streets, the army has established 200 temporary camps across the country and posted soldiers to abandoned police stations to ensure security.

     The country now awaits his next steps and to see whether the interim government can lay the groundwork for a break from a political system after a student-led protest movement forced Hasina from power.

     The military rule of the 1980s was replaced with a democratic system in 1991 in which Hasina’s Awami League and her rival Khaleda Zia’s Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) alternated power, with both sides being associated with corruption and political violence. Hasina had been in power since 2009, establishing an increasingly autocratic government that crushed the opposition and criticism from media and activists.

     But her grip on power was undone by a student protest movement over a quota system to allocate 30% of government jobs to the families of people who fought for independence from Pakistan in 1971 – which many felt limited their chances to secure stable jobs through hard work.

     The government responded with a heavy hand – arresting and torturing the leaders, while the police used live fire and Awami League activists beat protesters. A days-long internet blackout was imposed but when it ended videos poured out of protesters being shot at, hacked with machetes and run over by vehicles. The anger spread to wider society and became uncontrollable, leading to calls for justice even after the quota system was removed.

     A mass march through the centre of Dhaka had been called on Monday but as the protesters approached the prime minister’s residence, angered after another day when security forces killed around 90 people, they instead heard news that Hasina had resigned and fled in a helicopter.

     Two of the student leaders, Nahid Islam and Asif Mahmud, are part of the interim government, having forced the military to listen to them after it had initially only consulted the political parties when announcing it had taken control in Hasina’s absence.

     The government also includes a Hindu and a representative of the Chakma community, a minority from the Chittagong Hill Tracts region, as well as human rights and women’s rights activists.

     “For far too long we’ve had propaganda and abuse of power shoved down our throats and it feels as if we are suddenly freed. But it doesn’t end here,” said the creator of the Bangladeshi Voice. The social media platform has quickly grown to 40,000 followers after being set up on 18 July to spread awareness of the protests and the government’s crackdown.

     The page’s creator was involved in similar protests against the government in 2018, which escalated a crackdown on dissent, and now lives outside the country, speaking out anonymously to protect their family still in Bangladesh.

     They said they are hopeful for the future, and have been encouraged by the achievements of the country’s youth, but believe they need to stay vigilant and should not rush into elections which would be likely to benefit the established political parties.

   “I feel that now the real work begins for the interim government plus the people to uproot all the leftover fascists remaining from Hasina’s tenure. Bangladesh suffers from widespread corruption and this needs to be dealt with before any election takes place,” they said.

     “We do not want to unknowingly replace a dictator with another one … personally I wish for a new youth-led party to emerge in Bangladesh but I also think if an election is held soon BNP’s win is inevitable.”

     The political violence that has long blighted Bangladeshi politics immediately returned in the aftermath of Hasina’s resignation, reminding those who protested about why they have been so keen for a complete break from the old system.

     Opportunists looted the prime minister’s residence and people attacked signs of the old government, including police stations but also a memorial museum at the site where Hasina’s father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, considered Bangladesh’s founding father, was assassinated. But most concerning for many have been attacks on the Hindu minority.   

     Rana Dasgupta, who leads a group representing minorities, the Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council, said Islamist groups seemed to be taking advantage of the chaos to make Hindus feel unsafe. Though he did not have specific statistics, attacks have been reported on Hindu homes, property and temples in at least 52 districts. “We hold hope for the new interim government, yet our concerns are significant. This government, born from an anti-discriminatory movement, must prioritise and enhance protections for Hindus and other religious and ethnic minorities in the country.”

     Hasnat Abdullah, one of the leaders of the student movement, though not a member of the interim government, said that once security has been restored, the priority will be to rebuild confidence in government institutions, deal with high living costs and clean up the electoral and judicial systems that many believe were compromised to favour the Awami League.

     “They should be allowed enough time to reflect what we were asking for and what they’ve promised to do. We are not only talking about just handing over power to someone, we have asked for reform and reform can’t happen over night,” said Abdullah.

     The youth, in particular, seem keen not to rush into elections, believing that setting the foundations for a new political system is the main priority for a country that has struggled for unity since independence in 1971.

     On Saturday, more figures from Bangladesh’s establishment were forced out. The country’s chief justice resigned after students warned him of “dire consequences” if he remained in post. The central bank governor also quit, although his resignation had not been accepted.

     Hasina is now in exile, believed to be in India, to which she flew on Monday, but eyeing her next destination. Media reports first suggested she would seek asylum in the UK. Her sister Sheikh Rehana – who was with her as she left Bangladesh – lives there, while her niece Tulip Siddiq is now a UK government minister.

     But there has been no progress and her arrival would be controversial among the UK’s large British-Bangladeshi population. The Indian TV channel News18 reported that the United Arab Emirates could be another option.

     The victory the students won over Hasina is, they hope, the defeat of a system that since 1991 has meant only her and Zia have held power.

     “People think we don’t get it but I can’t emphasise enough: to bring positive change, you must listen to young people and their fresh ideas. I think we are on the right track and finally we will get a good update to Bangladesh 2.0,” said Ferdous.

     “The coming days are crucial and I want to tell everyone that our job is not done. If Asif and Nahid and Yunus don’t deliver, we’ll remove them. But I believe they will, they’re our best hope now.”

     As I wrote in my post of July 21 2024, Let Us Bring the Chaos: First Victory of the Resistance in Bangladesh; Not yet a revolution, the Resistance to the Hasina regime’s tyranny of  institutional unequal power in keeping jobs within the elite military caste of descendants of soldiers of the War of Independence, has in the past several days achieved a number of victories since the seizure, liberation, and burning of the political prison in a stunning reprise of the Storming of the Bastille and the battles with police and military forces which followed, and forced the regime to reverse its policy.

     As Guillermo del Toro teaches us in Carnival Row; “Chaos is the great hope of the powerless.”

     Let us enact reversals of order, play tricks which open the gates of our prisons to paths of transformational change, pursue the sacred calling of the truth teller, perform the four duties of a citizen; question authority, expose authority, mock authority, and challenge authority, and let us bring the Chaos.

     Live with grandeur; so Jean Genet teaches us, and prescribes the embrace of our own darkness as a path of liberation in the discovery and performance of our true and best selves.

     We all of us who in refusal to submit to Authority become Unconquered and bring the chaos as Living Autonomous Zones must question everything, ourselves most of all, if we are to dream new possibilities of becoming human.

     A maker of mischief, I; who sabotages authority and systems of unequal power in any ways I can imagine and whenever possible as part of a sacred calling in pursuit of truth.

    Once as a prank while teaching American History in high school I switched the textbook, a compendium of national memory, identity, and authorized truth, with the alternative American history trilogy by William S. Burroughs; Cities of the Red Night, The Place of Dead Roads, and The Western Lands.  I was hoping someone would call me on it, but no one ever did, so I went right on teaching the whole semester how insectoid aliens from Venus secretly rule earth through the Algebra of Need and our addiction to wealth and power. I think we had more fun in American History class that year than is usual.

    If games of transgression, unauthorized identities, and transformation you would play, I invite you to play a game of chance with me. Write down six characters you would like to play, traditionally in chaos magic this would be three male and three female characters though clearly here as in life all rules are arbitrary and I encourage you to create your own and change them at random, and throw a six sided dice to choose who you will be today. No matter who you live as today, you will have five other possible selves in reserve, and tomorrow is another day and another throw of the dice. All identity is theatrical performance.

    Celebrate with me April Fool’s Day as a liminal and transformative time of exploring unknowns beyond the boundaries of the Forbidden, the defiance of authority, the sabotage of elite hierarchies of wealth, power, and privilege, seizures of power from systems of oppression and carceral states of force and control, the violation of norms, and liberation from other people’s ideas of virtue.

     By such acts we do give answer to the terror of our nothingness with the joy of total freedom.

      Let us run amok and be ungovernable.

     As I wrote in my post of November 25 2020, Using Chaos and Transgression as Revolutionary Acts to Transform Law and Order Into Liberty and Equality; I am against law and order because law serves power, order appropriates and divides us into hierarchies of elite belonging and categories of exclusionary otherness, whereas Chaos autonomizes and transgression empowers liberation struggle, delegitimation of authority, and seizures of power.

    Order appropriates; Chaos autonomizes.

    Let us restore the balance to systems of unequal power and unjust authority; for no inequality is fair, and there is no just authority.

     Rejoice with me in this time of reversals of order through the performance of Acts of Transgression and Chaos. Let us dance our best and secret selves on the stage of the world, forge new truths, destroy and create ourselves anew in the ways we ourselves have chosen, and transform the systems and structures of oppression and tyranny, patriarchy and white supremacist terror, forces of exclusionary otherness and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, into a diverse and inclusive free society of equals.

    Dance with us in joy, revolution, and the frightening of the horses.

    As I wrote in my post of April 1 2020, There Is No Return To Normal; There is no return to normal if and when the Doom of Man pandemic ends. Normal doesn’t live here anymore.

    Once there was an illusion of mirrors, echoes, distorted surfaces without meaning, hollow and beautiful like a gossamer web of lies and irresistible as a gingerbread house.

     It calls to us, this thing of no escape, this American Dream, with promises of wealth and the power to choose the condition of our own lives. Our songs are of meritocracy, upward mobility, and an inclusive society, but concealed within are harsh realities of unequal power and opportunity limited by authorized identities and divisions of caste or class, race, gender, faith, and nationality.

     We are lured with belonging and membership, but offered only identitarian tribalization and exclusionary boundaries of otherness.

     We are seduced with the guarantee of our right to the pursuit of happiness, but our society can produce only material diversions which commodify and dehumanize us.

     We are offered security from intrusive forces at the price of our freedom and equality, and submission to authority and tyrannies of force and control. And security is an illusion, often one manufactured through fear by those who would enslave us as a pretext for the centralization of power to tyranny.

     Throughout American history since our founding we have ever been a free society of equals, co-owners of our own government, each of us a king of his own life, but only on paper. The American Revolution has yet to be achieved; it is an ongoing process in which each of us must negotiate the alignment and boundaries between the ideal and the real.

     In this struggle we are the prize; our agency or enslavement, our authenticity or the capture and limitation of the possibilities of our identity, our liberty both as individuals and as interdependent members of humankind.

     And we must act now to save ourselves and our civilization, for we are running out of time. We are in a contest of survival against plutocratic corporate greed and our extinction as a species on one hand and against fascist tyranny and the fall of democracy and global civilization on the other.

     Let us free ourselves from the illusions of our normality.

     As I wrote in my post of October 30 2023, A Hymn to Chaos; Tonight a window opens beyond our universe, letting angels through, or devils; and I welcome them both, figures of the twin sides of our nature and the limitless possibilities of becoming human, forces trapped within our flesh in titanic struggle or truths written in our flesh as transformative harmony.

    Herein is a liminal time in which we may shape ourselves anew, reimagine our lives and grow beyond the boundaries and limits of our horizon, explore unknowns in the unclaimed empty spaces of our topologies of human being, meaning, and value marked Here Be Dragons, discover new Best Selves and be reborn, become enraptured and exalted beyond ourselves as we ascend through the gaps of the heavens to embrace the wonder and terror of our total freedom in a universe bound by no Law and without any being, meaning, or value other than our own which we ourselves create.

     On this night in 2020 I put a curse on Donald Trump and all who voted for him in that election after four years of subversion of democracy and sabotage of America as a Russian agent and figurehead of the Fourth Reich, of white supremacist terror, patriarchal sexual terror, robber baron capitalism and ecological disaster which may include the extinction of humankind for the ephemeral profit of elites, tyranny and state terror in the brutal and criminal police repression of the Black Lives Matter protests, and a relentless multifront campaign against our ideals of liberty, equality, truth, and justice, and the institutions which serve them including a secular state, an independent and impartial judiciary, a free press and a press free from propaganda and disinformation, especially that of authorities and their carceral states of force and control, free from hate speech, conspiracy theories, rewritten histories, alternate realities; an open public forum of debate free from identitarian politics as fascisms of blood, faith, and soil and of fear and division weaponized in service to power, and an education system which produces citizens rather than slaves as a precondition of democracy.

     Curses and wishes give form and direction to vast imaginal forces of poetic vision as reimagination and transformation, and may change the balance of power in the world and the fate of humankind as an unfolding of our intention and the will to become. This one has been reasonably successful from my point of view; presaging the Restoration of America in the Biden Presidency and the exposure and purging of our betrayers from among us in the largest manhunt in our nation’s history as we bring a Reckoning to the fascist infiltrators of the January 6 Insurrection and their financiers and puppetmasters, and to all those who would enslave us.

    This year as I did last, and on every Halloween to come, for evermore, I shall perform the rituals of Cursing the Tyrants and the Casting Out of the Unclean Fascists that it may become final and eternal, propagating outwards into infinity as a wave of change and gathering force as it grows, like revolutionary struggle unstoppable as the tides; but I will balance it as well with a wish of blessing, protection, and good luck for all those whom Frantz Fanon called the Wretched of the Earth, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, and those champions who stand with them in solidarity and for a free society of equals.

     In this moment, with half the thousands dead in Gaza being women and children as well as civilians helpless before the bombs of vengeance as blood sacrifices to fear, rage, and hate, I know who my people are, and with whom I stand even if it is only to die with them.

     No one should have to die alone, abandoned and erased from history by a fallen civilization for whom our universal human rights and solidarity as each other’s guarantors of our humanity no longer has meaning or value.

     No Band of Brothers, we, but complicit in all evils we do not oppose or remain silent in witness of; especially we Americans whose taxes purchased the bombs of ethnic cleansing and genocide.

     Herein I claim both the peoples of Palestine and of Israel, versus the theocratic tyrants and terrorists on both sides who seek to subjugate them through fascist divisions of blood, faith, and soil and through fear weaponized in service to power. For the alt-right regime of Netanyahu has conspired with elements of Hamas in the October 7 attack for three purposes; first to stop the growing interdependence and mutual aid of the anticolonial Palestinian Independence movement with the Israeli democracy and peace movements which threatens authority in both Gaza and Israel and may yet emerge as a united and nonsectarian democracy, second to create a casus belli for Netanyahu’s conquest of the region including areas of Lebanon and Syria as a Second War of Independence, and third to delegitimize democracy as a guarantor of universal human rights by making its guarantor states complicit in unforgiveable war crimes in the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians by America’s client state of Israel.

     If America sends military aid to Israel rather than humanitarian aid to Palestine, the enemy regimes of Netanyahu and Hamas win, and the peoples of both states and our own lose.

     To refuse to submit is to become Unconquered, and this is a victory and a kind of power which cannot be taken from us, and through which we may find the will to claw our way out of the ruins and make yet another Last Stand.

     How do we create ourselves anew and emerge from the legacies of our histories?

      As I wrote in my post of May 28 2023, The True and False Crows: a Fable; A crow confronts his image in a pool of water, and as Nietzsche warned the darkness looks back. Of this I have written a paragraph on the Nietzschean idea of the Abyss, and of tragedy as failure to embrace our monstrosity and those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh; the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves.

      As Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil goes.; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

      It is also an origin of evil as the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; written in the tyrannies and systems of unequal power which hold humankind in their iron grip of force and control as Kristevan abjection and learned helplessness, and the ecological catastrophe which threatens our species extinction as disconnection from nature, control of nature as capitalist exploitation of resources and theft of the commons, carceral states of force and control as embodied violence, and our falsification, commodification, and dehumanization through the Wilderness of Mirrors.

     All of this requires the renouncement of love, as Wagner’s figure of tyranny Alberich the Dwarf must do to seize the Ring of power and dominion, a story more familiar to us as Tolkien’s retelling of the Nibelungenlied in his trilogy of novels which recast World War Two as an allegory of the abandonment of addiction to power. This has a corollary; the redemptive power of love, like the power of poetic vision to reimagine and transform ourselves, can free us from the Ring of Power and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     As written by Jean Genet in Miracle of the Rose; “A man must dream a long time in order to act with grandeur, and dreaming is nursed in darkness.”

     Here follows the paragraph of my thoughts on seeing this image, which if considered as a poem I now think of as the True and False Crows: a fable.

     Who is this imposter? If he is me, where now am I? Avaunt, my nemesis, for I shall pursue retribution for this theft of myself beyond all wrath now remembered, through death and hell and the terrors of our nightmares. Come and let us grapple for the truth of ourselves in this place where angels fear, and end not in silence but in exaltation and fire, with roars of defiance hurled against the chasms of our nothingness, supernal and magnificent as the Morningstar, and illuminate for all humankind the path of escape from this prison of illusions and lies. 

     To this my sister replied, Such poetry!

    This is as direct as I can be, o my sister. Should I merit some kind of monument one day, an absurd fantasy as I mean nothing to history and will vanish from the world without a trace, and nothing to anyone beyond yourself as the remnants of family, Dolly as my partner, and those few friends and allies who know my true identity, inscribe this therein.

     I have tried to salvage something of our humanity and to become a fulcrum and change the balance of power in the world these past forty years since I was sworn to the oath of the Resistance by Jean Genet, and often failed, but this is not what is important.

     What is important is to refuse to submit.

     And one thing more; to act with solidarity in revolutionary struggle. As the Oath of the Resistance created in Paris 1940 by Jean Genet from the oath of the Foreign Legion in which he once served, and given to me in Beirut 1982 in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a Last Stand beyond hope of victory or survival, and which I offer to all of you as a tradition to bear forward into the future; “We swear ourselves to each other, to resist and cease not, and abandon not our fellows.”

     In this my chosen life mission I have held true, for if each and every one of us stands in solidarity with others regardless of how different they may be from ourselves, we will become liberators and guarantors of each other’s uniqueness, and in refusal to submit will be victorious and free.

     He said it was the finest thing he ever stole, the Oath of the Resistance, but I often think of this in terms of a definition of the beauty of human beings; to become Unconquered and free as self created beings in refusal to submit to authority and its instruments of violence, force and control, and the repression of dissent, to refuse our dehumanization and the theft of our souls and autonomy and to do all of this in solidarity and absolute loyalty to each other.

    As he once said to me; “Is this not the beauty of men, to resist and never yield, to cede nothing to the enemy, not love nor hope, not our history nor the chance for a future of our own choosing, neither our monstrosity nor our grandeur, nothing of our humanity nor of any human being whose life is in our power to harm or help, to live beyond all limits and all laws and to risk everything to do this for each other?”

    I dream of a future something like the future envisioned by Gene Roddenberry in Star Trek. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations; the idea first put forth in the episode Is There In Truth No Beauty?, described in the first issue of the fanzine Inside Star Trek as; “that beauty, growth, progress — all result from the union of the unlike. Concord, as much as discord, requires the presence of at least two different notes. The brotherhood of man is an ideal based on learning to delight in our essential differences, as well as learning to recognize our similarities.” As stated in the episode The Savage Curtain; “I am pleased to see that we have differences. May we together become greater than the sum of both of us.”

     Liberty as freedom from authorized identities and truths, and equality and its corollary solidarity; these are the personal and social preconditions of democracy as a free society of equals.

    With all of the horrors I have witnessed in a life lived in the unknown spaces of our maps of becoming human marked Here Be Dragons, beyond the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden, through wars and revolutions  as a maker of mischief for tyrants and a monster who hunts other monsters for the chance to salvage something of our humanity, though in this I often fail as I did last spring in Mariupol and in the year of the fall of Afghanistan, regardless of the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, something in us refuses to submit to the abjection and learned helplessness of authoritarian systems and reaches toward exaltation and freedom. Whether such hope is a gift or a curse remains for each of us to discover in how we live our lives.

     In this I speak to you of truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh; we must embrace our darkness and claim our truths, and celebrate what Walt Whitman called the songs of ourselves as victorious seizures of power, freedom, and joy.

     Love and desire are innate capacities of reimagination and transformative rebirth, which like Dorothy’s magic ruby slippers cannot be taken from us and bear the power to send us home to our heart’s desire, to restore to us the self  which is truly ours.

      My flesh is a map of private holocausts, written with silent screams, nameless loves, causes lost and won, ephemeral signs of our secret histories and the lies and illusions which capture and distort our images in a wilderness of mirrors and the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.

     We have but one escape from the limits of our flesh and the flags of our skin; and this is love. In love we transcend ourselves and become exalted; through the redemptive power of love we may heal the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     Love is crucial both to poetic vision and as solidarity in action as processes of self-construal and becoming human; Siegfried walks through the fire and becomes human. There’s a good retelling of it in Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s musical episode, Once More With Feeling; plus it contains a marvelous re-enactment of the myth of Persephone.

     Let us always take the risks of our humanity, and place our lives in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.

     In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

     My friends, please feel free to perform and enact this spell with me; A Hymn to Chaos and Transgression:

     I invoke Chaos, freedom, and the limitless possibilities of becoming human against Order, Authority, and the boundaries of the Forbidden.

    I perform acts of transgression by which to break the chains of law and illusion woven by those who would enslave us, to seize our power and our autonomy from hierarchies of elite wealth, power, and privilege, from authorized identities and divisions of exclusionary otherness, to create myself in the image of my own imagination and no other, and to shape human being, meaning, and value to the forms of my desires.

     In this time of the turning of the tides I refuse and resist subjugation by force and control, I become Unconquered and free, I run amok and am ungovernable, and to Authority I reply with the Four Sacred Acts in pursuit of Liberty and Truth; Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

     By these invocations of Chaos and Transgression (Herein be free to make wishes, and to consecrate acts of defiance of tyranny, disruptions and subversions of good order and discipline, violations of normality, seizures of power, and celebrations of autonomy and living beyond all limits in the glorious embrace of our monstrosity, of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves) I curse all fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, patriarchy, state terror and tyranny, elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and inequalities of power.

     On this night of the renewal of the world in which the old order is consumed in fire and the spirit world moves among us and is unified with our own in its reimagination and transformation, I name to my brothers and sisters of Chaos these enemies of humankind as rightful prey; first, upon all tyrants and their forces of repression of dissent and enforcement of the Law, for order appropriates, law serves power, and there is no just authority; second upon Donald Trump (herein please feel free to name tyrants whom you oppose and seek to cast down from their thrones; mine include Vladimir Putin, Benjamin Netanyahu, and many others) and all who serve and support him and the cause of fascism, and all those who in voting for him in the Presidential election of November 3 2020 have signed the confession of their treason and allegiance to white supremacist terror, Gideonite patriarchal sexual terror,  and to the tyranny and terror of a police state.

     So upon Trump, his puppetmaster Vladimir Putin, and all who claim him as their own do I place my curse and invoke ruin upon their fortunes and their lives and destruction upon their cause. May they be forgotten and become nothing.

     This I balance with equal blessing, protection, and good luck upon the lives, fortunes, and causes of liberty and equality upon all who are powerless and dispossessed, marginalized by exclusionary otherness, falsified, commodified, dehumanized, silenced and erased, and those who place their lives in the balance with them in solidarity as champions and bearers of the Torch of Liberty and a free society of equals.

     Tonight our wildness will eat the moon and set it free.

     As written by Hannah Ellis-Petersen in The Guardian, in an article entitled National curfew imposed in Bangladesh after student protesters storm prison:

Army to be deployed to keep order after demonstrators free hundreds of prisoners and country is hit by serious unrest; “The Bangladeshi government has declared a national curfew and announced plans to deploy the army to tackle the country’s worst unrest in a decade, after student protesters stormed a prison and freed hundreds of inmates.

     “The government has decided to impose a curfew and deploy the military in aid of the civilian authorities,” a government spokesperson said late on Friday.

     AFP reported that at least 105 people have died in the unrest, which poses an unprecedented challenge to the government of Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister, after her 15 years in office.

     Earlier on Friday, a communications blackout was imposed across the country, with mobile internet access and social media blocked by the government.

     TV news channels were off air after the state broadcaster’s headquarters in Dhaka was stormed and set alight by protesters, and several news websites were down.

     A group of protesters stormed a jail in Narsingdi, a district just north of the capital, and freed its inmates before setting the facility on fire. According to Agence France-Presse, hundreds of inmates were released.

     Key government websites, including that of the central bank, the police and the prime minister’s office, also appeared to have been hacked by a group calling itself “THE R3SISTANC3”. A message posted across the prime minister’s office website on Friday called for an end to the killing of students, saying: “It’s not a protest any more. It’s a war now.”

     Another message posted on the website read: “The government has shut down the internet to silence us and hide their actions. We need to stay informed about what is happening on the ground.”

     The protests began this month on university campuses as students demanded an end to a quota system that reserves 30% of government jobs for family members of veterans who fought in Bangladesh’s war of independence in 1971.

     Those protesting have argued that the policy is unfair and discriminatory as young people struggle for jobs during an economic downturn and instead benefits members of the ruling Awami League party, which is led by the Hasina.

     Pro-government student groups have been accused of attacking the protesters, and police have routinely fired teargas and rubber bullets into the crowds, leaving thousands injured and dozens killed.

     Despite the ban on public rallies and gatherings, student groups still took to the streets on Friday. The sounds of gunfire and stun grenades could be heard coming from areas close to universities in Dhaka. According to reports, police were seen firing live ammunition to break up demonstrations and protesters accused police of being responsible for a large proportion of the fatalities.

     Witnesses said the protests had begun to take on a much broader anti-government tone against Hasina and her party, with slogans calling her an “authoritarian dictator” and demanding her resignation.

     Hasina has ruled since 2009 and overseen a vast and severe crackdown on political opponents and critics while corruption has flourished. Critical figures are routinely picked up in “enforced disappearances” by paramilitary forces and tens of thousands of political opponents have been jailed. She won a fifth term in January in an election widely documented as being heavily rigged.

     Clashes between heavily armed riot police and protesters, many wielding batons and bricks, have spread across the country, with vehicles set ablaze in the streets and thousands left injured. On Thursday protesters stormed the headquarters of the state broadcaster, Bangladesh Television, and set it on fire. Authorities said the building was safely evacuated.

     The Dhaka Times said one of its reporters, Mehedi Hasan, was killed while covering clashes in the capital.

     Access to social media was restricted after the telecommunications minister, Zunaid Ahmed Palak, said it had been “weaponised as a tool to spread rumours, lies and disinformation”.

     Hasina, 76, ordered that all universities and colleges be shut indefinitely after the clashes. In a speech on Wednesday night, she had condemned the “murder” of students killed in the protests and promised justice, telling students to wait for an supreme court order on the quota system, but it did little to quell the unrest.

     The prime minister was earlier accused of inflaming tensions after she defended the quotas and appeared to refer to protesters as “razakars”, a derogatory slur meaning those who betrayed the country by collaborating with the enemy, Pakistan, during the war of independence.

    The quotas that sparked the protests were abolished in 2018 but brought back last month after a court ruling, prompting outrage among students. About 40% of young people in Bangladesh are unemployed as the economy has foundered post-Covid, and government jobs are seen as one of the few means of secure employment. Young people say the quotas make it very difficult to get the jobs on merit.

     Hasina’s party, which was set up by her father, who led the independence fight for Bangladesh, is accused of disproportionately benefiting from the system.

    Pierre Prakash, the Asia director of the International Crisis Group, said the protests were a reflection of growing frustration on the streets at the erosion of democracy and the country’s economic distress, which has led to high inflation and rising unemployment.

     “The protests reflect deep political and economic tensions in Bangladesh. For several years Bangladesh’s economy has been struggling and youth unemployment is a serious problem,” he said. “With no real alternative at the ballot box, discontented Bangladeshis have few options besides street protests to make their voices heard.”

     Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for the UN secretary general, said they were following developments in Bangladesh and urged restraint on all sides.”

     All of this is wonderful, but there remain deeper and more profound underlying causes of inequality, and the Hasina regime’s creation and enforcement of a de facto aristocracy as an inherited military elite was only the most hideous example.

     The Revolution in Bangladesh has only just begun.

     As I wrote in my post of January 23 2023, Tyranny, Terror, and Resistance in Bangladesh; Mass elections and democracy protests against a tyrannical regime of brutal police repression have been gathering tidal momentum in Bangladesh for some while now, made ambiguous and complex by the pervasive terror of ISIS and its affiliates and ideological factions and their relationship with a regime which both fights against them and uses them as deniable assets in the centralization of power and subversion of democracy.

    In Bangladesh, those who would enslave us have no need to invent bogeymen, for the perpetrators of sectarian terror demonize themselves gladly. A truly aberrant and despicable enemy which is an alien intrusive force is a great gift to a police state.

     It is also extremely dangerous; the probabilities of such a scheme rebounding on its instigator in hideous ways approaches one hundred percent.

     To anyone who wishes to play the Great Game, I give this caution; those who ride whirlwinds cannot know where they may arrive in the end.

     A splendid truth from my perspective and for all revolutionaries and those who love liberty and hunger to be free, for if authority in its madness of power and need for control unleashes the Chaos as a space of free creative play and a window of opportunity for change, undoing itself as a mechanical failure from its own internal contradictions, all things become possible.

     Hasina’s puppetmastering of ISIS has linked the state to an implacable enemy it cannot control, and when it begins to wag the dog one of them will fall.

      In that Defining Moment of a nation and Rashomon Event of transformative change, we must be ready to balance the nightmare of theocratic tyranny and terror with the dream of a free society of equals.

     So for internal destabilization and subversion; Bangladesh also faces external threats, mainly from China as imperial conquest and dominion.

      China whispers of power to the Hasina regime, offering to underwrite its transformation into a totalitarian state with the poison pill of its gifts, a Trojan Horse strategy of soft conquest of the Indian subcontinent and its nations, among other targets of the Belt and Roads plan. China conquered Nepal and now rules it as a client state, seeks opportunity throughout the Central Asian nations of the old Silk Road, and currently controls a third of India itself through the Naxalite rebellion; the capture of Bangladesh would be pivotal to its long range imperial plans to conquer all of Central and South Asia and the Pacific Rim. This is the pull force at work in this arena.

     Then we have the push forces; the de facto hegemony of ISIS and sectarian fundamentalism which is now a law unto itself and answerable to none, and the example of the Rohingya as an existential threat weaponized in service to power, both that of ISIS and the carceral state of force and control which is Bangladesh.

     Here as always, everywhere, we must free ourselves from the legacies of our history in order to seize our power and be free.

     As written of the December election protests by Deutsche Welle in MSN, in an article entitled Thousands protest in Bangladesh against the ruling party; “Saturday’s protests come after a group of Western embassies called on the government to respect freedom of expression. Protests called for by the opposition party have been ongoing for weeks. Thousands of opposition protesters took to the streets in Bangladesh’s capita Dhaka on Saturday, calling for the government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to resign and install a caretaker government until elections are held in 2024.

     Protesters mostly support the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which is headed by the country’s former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia.

     Seven BNP members of parliament announced their resignations during the protest.

     Protesters made it to Golapbagh in Dhaka on Friday night despite tight security. Opposition activists chanted slogans including “Down with Hasina” and “We want a fair election,” the AP reported.

     Why are the protests taking place?

     Protests have been on the rise in recent months across Bangladesh, with protesters decrying power outages and the rise in energy prices.

     Saturday’s protests are essentially against Hasina and her ruling Awami League party, the BNP’s biggest archrival. The Awami League party was voted into power for the third consecutive time in 2018.

     However, the BNP challenged the results of the elections, accusing the Awami League party of rigging the vote.

     Zahiruddin Swapan, a former two-time opposition lawmaker and party spokesman, told AP, “We want a free and fair election. To facilitate that, this repressive government must go, parliament must be dissolved, and a new election commission should be installed.”

     He added, “They came to power through vote rigging and intimidation.”

    What do we know about the politics behind the protests?

     Saturday’s protests were further ignited by the arrest of two BNP figures the day before.

     The opposition party also accuses the authorities of arresting around 2,000 of its members and supporters since November 30.

      The rally on Saturday was the 10th since the BNP announced the launch of protests in 10 big cities across the country in September. Previous rallies have drawn significant numbers as well.

     BNP officials have claimed over a million supporters joined the rally, whereas police told the AP that the venue could not host more than 30,000 individuals.

     Eyewitnesses reported around 100,000 individuals in attendance.

     The ruling party and Hasina have repeatedly dismissed the BNP’s demand to install a caretaker government, saying it is against the state’s constitution.

     The BNP accused the government of orchestrating a transport strike to impact the protest turnout.

     A question of allegiances

     Historically allied with the US, the rule of Hasina has seen Bangladesh align with China more in recent years.

     China is funding several infrastructure projects in the country, worth billions of dollars, as part of China’s Belt and Roads Initiative. Critics charge the program is a debt trap for nations that sign on.

     Last Tuesday, the embassies of 15 Western countries, including the US and the UK in a joint statement, called on the government of Bangladesh to respect freedom of expression and the right to assembly, and to allow fair elections.”

     As written by Hannah Ellis-Petersen and Shaikh Azizur Rahman in the Guardian, in an article entitled “They beat me with sticks’: Bangladesh opposition reels under crackdown as thousands arrested: Police accused of shooting at activists and leaders of growing street protests against Sheikh Hasina’s draconian government: “It was a warm afternoon in May 2020 when Ahmed Kabir Kishore, dozing lazily, awoke to 20 men breaking down the door of his apartment in Dhaka, Bangladesh. With guns waved in his face, he was dragged to a van outside. “Move away, we have arrested a terrorist,” he heard them shout at the crowds.

     Kishore was not a terrorist. He was a cartoonist whose political drawings, published in prominent Bangladesh newspapers and magazines, took a critical view of the alleged corruption, human rights abuses and mishandling of the Covid pandemic by the government, led by prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

     For three days, he was kept blindfolded and handcuffed in a tiny room. Then the interrogation and torture began. “They beat me all across my body using sticks,” said Kishore. “They made me lie down and beat my feet.”

     The plainclothes officers questioned him about his connections to several journalists, hitting him so hard that his eardrum ruptured and he could barely walk.

     When the blindfold was removed, Kishore understood with dread that he was in the hands of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the elite anti-terrorism unit of the Bangladesh police, which has become notorious as a “death squad” and has been sanctioned internationally for its involvement in extrajudicial abductions, abuses and killings.

     On 5 May 2020, Kishore, whose wounds had begun to go septic, was handed to police and sent to Dhaka central jail. Alongside 11 others, including journalists and activists, he was charged under the Digital Security Act, ostensibly for spreading misinformation about Covid. Human rights groups claimed the law was a brazen attempt to silence government critics and criminalise dissent.

     For almost a year, Kishore remained behind bars, growing weaker from his injuries. But after a fellow detainee, journalist Mustaq Ahmed, died in prison nine months later – allegedly from his torture wounds – and global outrage followed, Kishore was granted bail in March 2021.

     After attempts were made to detain him again, Kishore fled to Nepal and on to Sweden, where he has lived in exile ever since. “I still cannot walk properly due to my injuries and I have lost hearing in the right ear,” he said.

     The ordeal endured by Kishore, Ahmed and countless activists, writers, artists, opposition politicians and lawyers since Hasina came to power in 2009 has formed the basis of the anti-government protest movement that is swelling in Bangladesh’s biggest cities.

     Economic hardship and rising fuel and food prices caused by the Covid pandemic and Ukraine war, coupled with frustration at a decade of alleged corruption, human rights abuses and rigging of elections, have driven hundreds of thousands to the streets for protests organised by the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and allies.

     Critics of Hasina and her Awami League government fear that elections due at the end of the year will be neither free nor fair – polls in 2014 and 2018 were marred by opposition boycotts and credible allegations of vote stuffing. They are demanding she resign and make way for a caretaker government. The BNP says it won’t take part in another election under Hasina.

     The response from Hasina, daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who led the country to independence in 1971, has been draconian. While the Awami League is free to hold vast gatherings, BNP rallies have been denied permission and transport strikes have been imposed to stop people attending.

     Police are accused of a coordinated campaign of violence against the opposition. Officers have fired on peaceful protests, killing eight BNP activists and injuring more than 200 protesters in the past five months. At least 20,000 cases have been filed against BNP supporters, while more than 7,000 BNP members and activists have been arrested, including prominent party leaders, including more than 1,000 detained just in the last month.

     “In the past, they used to carry out extrajudicial killings in staged gunfights at night; now they are killing in broad daylight. No one can hope for a free and fair election in this situation, under this government,” said AKM Wahiduzzaman, a BNP leader.

     During Hasina’s 13 years in power, Bangladesh has thrived as one of the fastest-growing economies in Asia, becoming the main supplier of garments to the west. However, the period has also seen authoritarianism and human rights abuses at the hands of the state, particularly by the RAB. Last year, the US sanctioned six RAB commanders for alleged extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances.

     Zakir Hossain, 37, a former army major, was among those “disappeared” by the RAB in December 2011. After more than 50 officers seized him from his home, he was interrogated, tortured and accused of planning a coup against Hasina’s government.

     “During the detention I received inhuman treatment that can only be compared to those horrifying stories of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay,” he said. He was kept in solitary confinement for almost three years, and for 11 months in jail before he was finally released, never having faced a courtroom for his alleged crimes. In 2021, he fled to the UK. “I am thankful to God that I am still alive,” he said.

     Despite the US sanctions a year ago, human rights groups say the RAB is still involved in such abuses, and at least 16 people were forcibly disappeared in Bangladesh. “The human rights situation in Bangladesh is appalling,” said Ali Riaz, professor of political science at Illinois State University. “The number of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances are blatant testimony to this.”

     As international pressure from the US, UK and others has increased on Hasina’s government, foreign minister AK Abdul Momen has rejected accusations of a crackdown on the political opposition. “Our government has always come to power through the fair electoral process,” he said, adding that forthcoming polls will offer “a free and fair election which will be acceptable to all”.

     However, Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman, liaison officer of the Asian Legal Resource Centre in Hong Kong, said that, in the current situation, “a fair and credible election is unimaginable”.

     “Bangladesh does not have an independent institution to hold the ruling party accountable,” he said. “The judiciary, the election commission, intelligence agencies, and the law-enforcement agencies all collaborate with each other to rig elections for the ruling party and hide the crimes of the regime.”

      As written by Emma Graham-Harrison and Saad Hammadi in the Guardian, in an article entitled Inside Bangladesh’s killing fields: bloggers and outsiders targeted by fanatics; “First they came for the bloggers, the atheists, the secular intellectuals. Then the three-year murder spree spread to aid workers, minority religions and Muslims who did not want their country reshaped by extremist Islam.

     The attack on Professor Rezaul Karim Siddiquee was so frenzied that its traces remain more than a month later, arcs of dried blood spattered up a pink wall and a pile of sand covering bloodstains that had pooled on the ground where the softly spoken lecturer was all but beheaded.

     He was killed on his way to work in the city of Rajshahi by four men who knew their target and his routines well. At least one of the killers was a former student who had a reputation for barracking the professor in class about the “immorality” of the English literature he taught, police believe.

    Neighbours in the narrow alley where Siddiquee was murdered overheard him greet someone moments before his death. “You’re here?” he asked his killer. His final words were spoken in surprise but not fear, because Siddiquee never imagined that he would be a target for extremists, his family says.

     The murder fitted into a pattern laid down over a gruesome three-year killing spree by extremist groups in Bangladesh: a bloody but brutal attack in broad daylight with the most basic of weapons, and later a claim of responsibility from Islamic State (Isis) or al-Qaida.

     But it was also a warning of the way the killers have expanded their campaign, from a focused assault on secular activists into a wider war to reshape Bangladeshi society along lines determined by Islamist extremists.

     Siddiquee was an observant believer who regularly attended prayers and even paid for the renovation of the mosque in his ancestral village – his was the most anodyne of public profiles. If he was a target, surely millions of other Bangladeshis are too.

     “What he was, we all are. If a person like him who loves to read, recite literature and play music at home can be killed, all of us are liable to be next,” said one of Siddiquee’s colleagues, asking not to be named for fear it could push him up a list of possible targets.

     Foreigners, religious minorities from Hindus to Christians, Muslims from other sects and even Sunnis who subscribe to a more generous vision of faith than their attackers, are all now at risk.

     Since 2013, 30 people have been murdered. They were from all faiths and social backgrounds, linked above all by the manner of their deaths, at the hands of men wielding machetes, knives and even swords. At least three others barely escaped assassination attempts, surviving with scars on their faces and necks that look like medieval battle injuries.

     One, Ahmed Rahim Tutul (pictured on page 15), survived only because he fell between a table and chair as a militant slashed at his head with a sword in an attack that left terrible scars across his face.

     The toll is tiny in absolute terms for a country of around 160 million people, and authorities insist they have the upper hand in the battle against what they describe as a relatively small, unprofessional band of fanatics, pointing to dozens of arrests. On Saturday, after the latest killing, security forces rounded up 1,600 people in a show of strength, although they admitted that only 37 of the detained were suspected Islamist militants, and the rest were petty criminals, AP reported.

     “If they think they could turn Bangladesh upside down, they are wrong,” prime minister Sheikh Hasina told parliament before the raids.

     But the brutality has thrown daily life out of kilter in disturbing ways, pushing the country towards the conservatism and religious monoculture that the attackers apparently seek.

     At the country’s second-largest university, where Siddiquee taught, professors are curtailing classes out of fear of their own students. Authorities have received a hit list of around 40 professors, and some have received threats by phone and letter.

     A week after Siddiquee’s killing, three men on a motorbike roared into the village of a Hindu tailor, Nikhil Joarder, hacked him to death and threw his body in a ditch. Again, they struck in the middle of the day, on a main road lined with shops and homes, but his former friends and neighbours all insist that no one saw the faces of his killers.

      The murder put an end not just to Joarder’s life, but to a long history of religious diversity in the village. Joarder’s wife and his brother’s family fled after the killing, and now the courtyard of corrugated iron homes that was the tiny Hindu enclave is locked and empty.

     “I came here for my security. I have nothing now,” said his widow Aruti Rani Joarder, weeping at a relative’s home in a nearby town. “This is not a safe country for the Hindu community.”

     Despite the government’s promise of swift justice and a string of arrests such attacks have, if anything, gathered pace. So far in June, four people have been murdered: two Hindus, a Christian trader and the wife of a senior police officer tasked with stopping militants, a cross-section of Bangladeshi society. As the list of victims has lengthened, so has the sense of menace across the country.

     The first attacks targeted only prominent secular intellectuals, a tiny and easily identified group. Few people are ready to take a prominent public stand against religion in a country where Islamist groups have deep roots and where there is a devout Muslim majority.

     After killers circulated the bloggers’ work beyond its original audience, outrage dimmed to apathy among many people, who considered the attacks reasonable punishment for what conservative Islam deems a capital crime. The nominally secular government did little to dispel the impression that the killings were disturbing but a minority concern. Hasina’s government is waging a bitter political battle against Islamist and conservative opposition groups, and is apparently unwilling to risk popular support with a fierce defence of unpopular radicals.

     Her government’s muted response to killings has been laced with insinuations that the bloggers contributed at least in part to their murders. “These attacks are not acceptable, but at the same time we expect people to stop criticising the prophet Muhammad,” said Shahriar Alam, one of the country’s junior foreign ministers, told the Observer.

     But the bloggers are now a minority among the dead, rendering pointless the calls for self-censorship. Spiritual leaders, foreign aid workers and ordinary members of minority religions appear to have been targeted more for what they represent than anything they have done, making the murders impossible to predict or prevent.

     One of the peculiarities of the killings in Bangladesh is that none has been claimed by a local operation. There have been no demands or ultimatums, or any explanation for why victims were targeted.

     That vacuum has been filled only by statements from Isis and al-Qaida, claiming responsibility for killings thousands of miles from their nearest known base, and made in Arabic, a language not widely spoken in Bangladesh except by religious scholars. A recent Isis propaganda magazine boasted an interview with a man whom they claimed was head of operations in Bangladesh.

     Analysts say it is extremely unlikely that Isis has set up a cell in Bangladesh. “It’s physically impossible for an organisation that is Iraq- or Syria-based to go somewhere so far away and launch operations,” said Kamran Bokhari, a fellow at George Washington University’s programme on extremism and an expert on South Asia.

     But the consistency and speed of the statements suggest there is an Isis link with killers in Bangladesh, perhaps through a member of the diaspora, turning the attacks into a propaganda tool for both parties.

     For local organisations, even a basic link-up with Isis brings extra publicity and possibly recruits, as well as the potential of hard cash. “You go from relative obscurity to an influx of tradecraft, maybe cash.”

     Such a connection may be deepened if the government cannot stop the attacks, as local groups gain a reputation and improve their operational skills. “If this cell doesn’t die down, how long are they just going to use machetes? They are going to get more confident, more emboldened,” Bokhari said.

     Hasina, who has insisted that the killings are part of a political campaign by local terror groups and fiercely rejects the possibility that al-Qaida or Isis have a foothold in Bangladesh, promised a stronger response after the latest attack.

     The man charged with responding will be police commissioner Monirul Islam, who broke up the cell behind some of the earliest attacks on bloggers and now heads a 600-man counter-terror police unit and says he is chasing two groups. The first is a sophisticated and well-financed operation that targets bloggers and secular activists in carefully planned attacks – a group once known as Ansarullah Bangla Team but recently renamed Ansar al Islam.

     Members arrested in connection with attacks include the son of a top banking executive, the nephew of a deputy minister, and a man who worked for multinationals including Coca-Cola. Commissioner Islam believes the group is still dangerous, and considers cracking it one of his biggest tasks. “They are the real extremist group: they follow the ideology of some global outfit, like al-Qaida, though they don’t have direct connections with them,” he said.

     The second network is responsible for most of the recent killings, Islam believes. A re-formed wing of local terror group Jaamat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), which set off bombs around Bangladesh a decade ago before being largely dismantled, it is now targeting Hindus, Christans, foreigners and Buddhists to send a political message.

     They are less sophisticated and less well-financed than the group pursuing bloggers, Islam says, which should make the killings easier to stop. At present, he believes, the group has just a few dozen members, and many have been rounded up already, or are on a “most-wanted” list.

     Among them are the men behind Professor Siddiquee’s murder, former students frustrated by classes on literature which they considered transgressive.

     “Two of his students were involved in this killing, former honours students,” said Islam. “One was very vocal in class, sometimes used to oppose the professor’s views, particularly during discussions on fiction and non-fiction. Eventually, he dropped out.”

     Even those most desperate for police to find the killers are unsure if the people they are arresting are the right ones. Siddiquee’s family and former colleagues say they want real justice, not simply detentions with few details and a legal process so glacially slow that the men accused of killing another professor in 2004 only came to trial this year.

     Analysts say there is a risk that police, who were criticised for brutality in the past, and who are relatively unfamiliar with tackling extremist cells, could resort to indiscriminate tactics. “They go around shopping people, beating people up – and they create further resentment in society by targeting the wrong people – there are lots of ideological extremists who aren’t terrorists,” said Bokhari.

     There is already concern about the death of a young student in custody, after he was arrested in connection with Siddiquee’s murder. Shortly after the killing, officers swooped on a working-class home near the murder site and picked up Mohammad Hafizur Rahman. He died in jail a few weeks later, and the family is still waiting for his death certificate.

     The first person in his family to go to university, Rahman was a second-year student in public administration, whose parents say he was devout but not militant. “He was the big hope of our family,” said Halima Begum, his mother, as she leafed tearfully through his graduation certificates from schools and madrassas, all boasting top grades.

     They believe that neighbours falsely accused him of a role in the killing as part of a feud, and they say Rahman was ready to wait out a process which he assured them would end with his innocence being vindicated.

    He suffered from the blood disorder thalassaemia, and police said he died from natural causes, although officers struggled to explain the lack of a death certificate.

     “It’s not what people say, a death in police custody; he was well taken care of by the doctors in the jail hospital,” said local police chief Sardar Tamizuddin Ahmed, who added that Rahman had not been a key suspect. “It’s not that he was involved, but there are sometimes many sorts of information that help investigating the case.”

     His relatives are careful to say that they do not blame the police for his death,    but they insist he had all the medicines he needed for his condition. They also say there were large unexplained welts on his waist when his body was returned to the family, and they question why they are still waiting for a death certificate.

     “Each day we ask for it and they give us a different reason not to issue it. They know my brother is innocent, he has no crimes committed, that’s why they are delaying,” said Habib Rahman. In an indication of official attitudes to police brutality, minister Alam said he had no concerns about either the death, or the potential loss of a key witness.

     Tensions are now so high in Rajshahi that police wait at the airport to offer permanent armed escorts to any foreigners flying into town.

     On a sunset stroll beside the river Padma, Rajashi hardly seems a threatening place: friends, families and couples gather to gossip and take endless selfies, watching river dolphins tumble through the muddy waters and snacking on fruit.

     But barely a kilometre away, the blood stains in the alley where Professor Siddiquee was murdered are testament to a much darker side of the city – and a disturbing history of extremism – that authorities have been unable or unwilling to tackle.

     Its activists are so committed, according to police and other officials, that decades ago they ensured that they married into families based near the university to secure a long-term base.

     Such historical allegations are difficult to verify, but one of the many unsettling facts about Siddiquee’s death is that it was not the first such killing: he was the fourth faculty member of Rajshahi university, one of the most prestigious in Bangladesh, to be murdered by extremists within a decade. In at least two other cases, student suspects were caught.

     “When they choose a victim, they choose always a person who is involved in a large community, [who is] educated and has a strong conscience,” said Ahmed, the Rajshahi police commissioner. “A teacher is an easy target for them, and when a teacher is killed there is a very big outcry.”

     Although individual terror raids or mass shootings have claimed more lives at schools and colleges in other countries over that period, and universities often become battlegrounds when nations go to war, for a country at peace, the rate of extremist assassinations – and authorities’ failure to stop them – is staggering.

     However, at the university there is widespread denial about the networks of radicalisation woven into campus life. Several professors insisted to the Observer that some of the earlier killings had been about personal and professional disputes, even as they admitted that they had altered their own behaviour and routines to guard against becoming a target.

    It is a form of self-protection for more than 1,000 lecturers who face an almost unimaginable risk but have received little support from security forces beyond a warning to be careful.

     Instead, they are watching their words even more closely than usual, and fear that fanatics who consider the education they offer to be too broad have made the first steps towards curtailing it.

     “I have become much more self-conscious in our classes, being sure not to offend any groups, and all the time repressing myself, my own free will,” said a second colleague of Siddiquee’s, who asked not to be named. “I take care again and again not to identify myself with the views in class, saying that this is the author’s view, not mine.”

     That creeping sense of oppression bothers most in the faculty even more than the threats to their lives. In response, they are demanding not greater security for academics, but greater police efforts to catch Siddiquee’s killers and dismantle the radical networks that fostered them.

     The roads through the university have been painted with demands for justice in English and Bengali, a giant noose because students and colleagues alike want the perpetrators hanged, and clenched fists of those who have vowed to fight for Siddiquee.

     The nervous university has banned his colleagues from setting up a platform in the gardens outside, which they hoped would serve as a memorial and focal point for weekly protests they plan to hold until his killers are found and brought to trial.

     However, authorities fear this would set a precedent. Too many professors have been killed for all of them to be given a rallying point.”

      As written by Saad Mamadi in The Guardian, in an article entitled Anyone could become a target: wave of Islamist killings hits Bangladesh. Spate of attacks on country’s prominent atheist and gay activists, bloggers and academics engulfs Dhaka; “There is an eerie feeling out on the streets of Bangladesh. To some of the city’s academics, activists and gay community, Dhaka now feels more dangerous than a war zone, after a spate of machete attacks by Islamist groups, including the murder last week of the founder of Bangladesh’s first magazine for the gay community.

     At least 16 people have died in such attacks in the past three years, among them six secular bloggers, two university professors, an Italian priest, two other foreigners working in the development sector, and a prominent gay activist.

     On Saturday a Hindu man, Nikhil Joarder, was hacked to death in the district of Tangail, central Bangladesh, with police suggesting his killing might be connected to a 2012 complaint claiming that he had made comments against the prophet Muhammad.

     Other targets have included high-profile cultural and intellectual figures, but also very private individuals, apparently murdered simply because Islamists objected to their lifestyle. The diversity of the victims, and the authorities’ sluggish response to the killing spree, have spread fear among anyone who identifies with those who have been killed.

     “I am more worried now here than I ever was in Afghanistan, where the threats were more of an existential nature,” says a gay American who has spent time in the war-torn country and now lives in Bangladesh. He asked not to be named.

     Among his friends to have died were Xulhaz Mannan, a prominent activist – founder of Roopbaan, the country’s only magazine for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community – and Mannan’s friend, Mahbub Rabbi Tonoy. Six to seven assailants pretending to be from a courier company forced their way into Mannan’s apartment and hacked the two men to death last week.

     Homosexuality is illegal in Bangladesh and many members of the gay community were already living in fear of being identified. Now they also have to fear for their lives – and the murders have in effect outed many young people by forcing them to change their daily routine.

     “The news of Xulhaz and Tonoy’s deaths has exposed many young gays and lesbians to their families before they were ready,” says a close friend of Mannan’s, who lives in the US and also did not want to be named. “I know of people not going to work for seven days, who have no hope of going back now.”

     Shockwaves from the killings went far beyond the gay or activist communities, reaching diplomatic and development workers. Mannan was a former employee of the US embassy and before his death worked at the US government’s development agency USAid.

     “They [militants] are really trying to get attention by striking against the people whose deaths would get [wide publicity],” says another US expatriate from within the gay community. “It makes me think twice about certain things,” he told the Observer.The attackers are also striking at Bangladeshi cultural and intellectual life far beyond the capital. Two days before Mannan and Tonoy were killed, two men on a motorbike drew up to a bus stop in the northwestern city of Rajshahi and hacked Rezaul Karim Siddique to death. Islamic State said that he had been killed for “calling to atheism”.

     Siddique was an English professor at Rajshahi University, a musician and a devout Muslim who had no political affiliation. An aficionado of the sitar, he donated to the mosque in his home village and had helped students at its madrasa, or religious school, according to Muhammad Shahiduzzaman, a professor of international relations at the University of Dhaka.

     “Anybody could become a target,” Shahiduzzaman says.

     Many of those now living in fear think that this was exactly the intention of the killers. Five grisly murders within a month have had a chilling effect across Bangladeshi society. “I have had to cut down on my presence in the civil liberty protests. It was not this frightening even a few days ago,” says Imran H Sarkar, the leader of secular activist group Ganajagaran Mancha.

     Responsibility for all of the attacks has been claimed either by Islamic State or Ansar al-Islam, a chapter of al-Qaida in the subcontinent, but Bangladeshi authorities have denied the existence of international jihadi groups in the country. They say the attacks are being carried out by homegrown militants with links to the main opposition party, who are seeking to destabilise the government.

     Regardless of who is behind the killings, they are a worrying sign of weakening political and security institutions, in a country of 160 million that until now has proved relatively successful in battling extremism.

     Bangladesh’s majority Bengali Muslim population has historically had relatively liberal values, says Afsan Chowdhury, a political analyst, but those traditions are now under threat. “Islamic militancy has been growing for the last 10 to 15 years as political institutions have weakened,” he adds.

     After the prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, held on to power in a 2014 election boycotted by the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist party and its allies, authorities arrested senior opposition leaders on charges of instigating violence.

     “The government has very effectively punished the opposition to the point they are not really a political force any more,” says Chowdhury. The vacuum of a strong opposition has made the atmosphere unpredictable.

     The spate of killings started in February 2013 after activists demanded that the government hang everyone convicted of collaborating with the Pakistan army during the country’s war of independence from Pakistan in 1971.

      Many of those brought to trial, in proceedings widely criticised by human rights groups for not meeting international standards, were linked to the opposition and its Islamist allies. One Islamist group, Hefazat-e-Islam, responded by drawing up a list of 84 atheist bloggers and demanding that the government take action against them for publishing blasphemous content online. At least five of the victims since 2013 were named on that list.

     But there has been little official support for others who appear on it, and families of victims and those at risk fear police investigations are too slow and ineffective. So far at least 46 people have been arrested, but only two have been found guilty; they were given the death penalty for their role in the killing of the blogger Ahmed Rajib Haider.

     “An arrest is not an assurance of justice,” said Sarkar, the secular campaigner.

     There is also frustration that some killers of Avijit Roy, a murdered American blogger of Bangladeshi origin, have been able to escape the country.

     Concerns about security are mounting from international quarters after the killing of Mannan. “The government will try to hunt down possible suspects [in Mannan’s killing] but whether they can really get at the actual culprit, there is a great deal of doubt,” Shahiduzzaman told the Observer.

     Survivors feel forgotten. Asha Mone’s husband, the blogger Niladry Chattopadhya, was hacked to death in front of her, but police have not contacted her in five months, she told the Observer. Officers said they had arrested five suspects in relation to the case.

     Many are also concerned that authorities who should be chasing the killers are instead blaming the victims. They point to a statement by Bangladesh’s police chief after the killing of Mannan, asking citizens to be aware of their security, and other comments by officials blaming blogger victims for writing about religion. “What upsets me most is how [the] government is now going out of their way to find other motives behind the murder,” says Mannan’s friend who lives in the US.

     Even if the authorities do step up efforts to find and prosecute the killers, the fear that has been created will linger.

     “I walk in the park every morning, and today a man came towards me carrying a knife. When he walked past me, I turned my head so I could check he was walking away,” says a gay expatriate living in the diplomats’ area of Dhaka.

     He could not shake off his fear, even when he later found out that the man was there to cut the grass.’

    And all of this sectarian religious terror and state terror is shadowed by the pathos of the Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, twice victimized; both driven from their homes in a wave of ruthless ethnic cleaning and anti-Islamic hysteria by the Buddhist fascist military junta of Myanmar, then exploited by criminal syndicates protected by the government of Bangladesh to whom they had fled for safety and the solidarity of Islamic peoples under threat from intrusive and reactionary forces who do not consider them fellow human beings. The horrific example of the Rohingya are a push force driving both radicalization and the centralization of power to a carceral state in Bangladesh.

     As written by Ruma Paul, Sudipto Ganguly and Krishna N. Das in The International Business Times, in an article entitled Surging Crime, Bleak Future Push Rohingya In Bangladesh To Risk Lives At Sea; “Mohammed Ismail says four of his relatives were killed by gunmen at the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh between April and October last year. He recalls the September night when, he says, he almost met the same fate: masked men kidnapped him, cut off parts of his left arm and leg and dumped him in a canal.

     “They repeatedly asked me why I gave their personal details to the police,” Ismail, seated on a plastic mat with his left limbs covered in white bandage and cloth, told Reuters at the Kutupalong refugee camp. “I kept telling them I didn’t know anything about them and had not provided any information.”

     About 730,000 Rohingya, a mostly Muslim minority present in Myanmar for centuries but denied citizenship in the Buddhist-majority nation since 1982, fled to Bangladesh in 2017 to escape a military crackdown. Including others who migrated in prior waves, nearly 1 million live near the border in tens of thousands of huts made of bamboo and thin plastic sheets.

     An increasing number of Rohingya are now leaving Bangladesh for countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia via perilous boat journeys, as rising crime in the camps adds to longstanding troubles like a lack of educational and work opportunities and bleak prospects of returning to military-ruled Myanmar.

    Crimes recorded in the camps – including murder, kidnapping, rape, robbery, human trafficking and narcotics trade – have soared in recent years, according to data that Bangladesh police shared exclusively with Reuters. Murders rose to 31 in 2022, the highest in at least five years.

     “A series of murders of Rohingya men, including some leaders, at the camps have sparked fear and concern about militant groups gaining power, and local authorities failing to curb increasing violence,” said Dil Mohammed, a Rohingya community leader in the camps.

     “That’s one of the main reasons behind the surge in Rohingya undertaking dangerous sea voyages.”

    Police declined to comment on questions about Ismail or the issues at the camps beyond the data they shared.

     Data from UNHCR, the U.N. refugee agency, show that about 348 Rohingya are thought to have died at sea in 2022, including in the possible sinking late last year of a boat carrying 180 people, making it one of the deadliest years since 2014. Some 3,545 Rohingya made or attempted the crossing of the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea to Southeast Asian countries last year, up from about 700 in 2021, the UNHCR said.

     Ismail, 23, said he believes insurgents targeted him and his relatives, who were aged between 26 and 40, after his cousins rejected repeated approaches over the preceding three or four years to join a militant outfit, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA). The group has fought against Myanmar’s security forces and some Rohingya say it has been recruiting fighters, often through coercion, in the Bangladesh camps.

     In letters to the UNHCR in November and this month seen by Reuters, Ismail said he witnessed the killings of two of his cousins on Oct. 27.

     Reuters could not independently verify the deaths of Ismail’s relatives, but his account was corroborated by his brother, Mohammed Arif Ullah, 18. The UNHCR declined to comment on Ismail’s case, citing safety and privacy risks.

     About a dozen Rohingya men in the camps, who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal, said that ARSA militants, whose stated goal is to fight for and restore the rights and freedom of the Rohingya in their ancestral homeland, were involved in criminal activities in the camps, including human and drug trafficking.

     An ARSA spokesperson did not respond to questions Reuters sent by email and Twitter about the fates of Ismail and his family, and its alleged involvement in trafficking and attempts to recruit fighters in the camps. The group said on Twitter in December that its activities were confined to Myanmar.

     “Any crimes and incidents happening in the camps… in all such happenings, most of the time innocent Rohingya refugees from the camps are labelled as ARSA members and extra-judicially arrested by the authorities,” it said.

    The UNHCR acknowledged concerns about crime in the camps, saying it had increased its presence so that refugees could access protection and support.

     “Among the serious protection incidents reported to UNHCR are abductions, disappearances, threats or physical attacks by armed groups and criminal gangs involved in illegal activities,” said Regina de la Portilla, the agency’s communications officer in Bangladesh.

     Reuters could not independently obtain evidence of drug trafficking by ARSA, though previous Reuters reporting described how refugees had been drawn into the trade out of desperation.

     Accounts of violent crime in the overcrowded refugee settlements are adding to pressure on densely populated Bangladesh, which has struggled to support the Rohingya and has called for Myanmar to take them back.

     Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, Bangladesh’s Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commissioner based in Cox’s Bazar, said the government was trying to control crime, including through a separate police battalion posted to the camps, but that “criminals just flee across borders when we run an operation”.

     “For me, ARSA are thugs, hoodlums, hopeless people who now depend on drug peddling and extortion,” he said. “They don’t have a country, society, and nobody recognises them. That is why they are involved in crimes and life is meaningless to them.”

      Human Rights Watch said this month, in a report based on interviews with more than 40 refugees, that Bangladesh police’s Armed Police Battalion, which took over security in the camps in 2020, was committing extortion, arbitrary arrests, and harassment of Rohingya refugees. The battalion did not respond to emails seeking comment.

     Rahman said returning the Rohingya to Myanmar was the “only solution” to their problems. But Myanmar’s military junta, which took power in a coup two years ago, has shown little inclination to take them back. A Myanmar government spokesman could not be reached for comment.

     Ismail, who lives with his parents, wife and brother, says he fears for his life and understands why some Rohingya are fleeing Bangladesh.

     “It’s better to die at sea than being killed by terrorists or dying every day living in fear,” he said.

     The police data show that crimes in the camps and the number of Rohingya arrested in Bangladesh last year were 16 times the levels of 2017 – a significant jump even after accounting for the influx of refugees. Police arrested 2,531 Rohingya and registered 1,220 cases last year, up from 1,628 arrests and 666 cases in 2021.

     About 90% of cases last year, and a similar proportion of arrests, involved murder, illegal use of weapons, trade in narcotics, robbery, rape, kidnapping, attacks on police and human trafficking. Reuters could not determine how many of these resulted in convictions.

     The murders of 31 Rohingya marked an increase from a previous high of 27 in 2021. Related arrests reached 290, from 97 a year earlier. Drug-related cases and arrests also soared.

     Khair Ullah, a senior Burmese language instructor at the Development Research and Action Group, an NGO, said that besides concern about crime, the refugees were frustrated because about 90% of them had no education or employment.

     “They are worried about their future. They can’t support their old parents,” said Ullah, 25, who is Rohingya and lives in the camps. “What will happen when they have kids? The other big issue is that there’s no hope of repatriation from here, so they’re trying to leave the camps illegally.”

     Reuters spoke with several refugees who returned to the Bangladesh camps after abandoning journeys to Malaysia, via Myanmar, out of trepidation.

     Enayet Ullah, 20, who is not related to Khair Ullah, arrived in Bangladesh in 2017 with his family. In December, he said, he saw the bodies of two Rohingya men who had been killed in the area of the camps where he lives.

     “When I saw their bodies, I was traumatised,” he said. “I thought I could have died this way. Then I decided to leave the camp for Malaysia.”

     Taking a boat from Teknaf in Bangladesh with nine others on the night of Dec. 13, Ullah said he reached the Myanmar town of Sittwe the next day. He had arranged for traffickers to take him to Malaysia for 450,000 taka (about $4,300).

     “More Rohingya were supposed to join us and then a bigger boat would sail for Malaysia,” Ullah said. “They were waiting for a green signal to start the voyage. But my gut feeling was that the journey wouldn’t be safe.”

     He got cold feet and asked the traffickers to send him back to Bangladesh for 100,000 taka.

     Ullah laments that after more than five years in the camps, his homeland seems as far away as ever.

     “No education, no jobs. The situation will only deteriorate as time passes by,” he said.

     Those who reach Malaysia – where there are about 100,000 Rohingya – often find their situation similarly dire. Deemed illegal immigrants, many are jobless and complain of harassment by police. And the deteriorating political situation in Myanmar since the coup has dashed any hopes of repatriation in the near term.

     Mohammed Aziz, 21, said he pulled out of a sea trip to Southeast Asia after he saw pictures of boats that traffickers were using, and felt they were too small. He said he had to pay 80,000 taka for the trip to the Myanmar coast from Bangladesh and back.

     “People are risking their lives on sea journeys as there is no future here and criminal activities are rising,” Aziz said. “But I’ll beg them not to take this dangerous sea route. You can end up dying at sea.”

Walk Through the Fire, song from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, episode Once More With Feeling

A Crow Confronts His Image

Ring of Power: Symbols and Themes Love Vs. Power in Wagner’s Ring Circle and in Us: A Jungian-Feminist Perspective, Jean Shinoda Bolen

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/451808.Ring_of_Power?ref=nav_sb_ss_2_13

Powers of Horror: an Essay on Abjection, Julia Kristeva

http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/touchyfeelingsmaliciousobjects/Kristevapowersofhorrorabjection.pdf

Miracle of the Rose, Jean Genet

One of Us scene in the 1932 film Freaks

The American Trilogy, William S. Burroughs

https://www.goodreads.com/series/65214-the-red-night-trilogy

The Dice Man, Luke Rhinehart

Bangladeshi journalists hopeful of press freedom as Hasina era ends: Reporters cautiously optimistic as interim government takes over after years of intimidation and censorship

Who is Muhammad Yunus, the new leader of Bangladesh’s interim government?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/07/who-is-muhammad-yunus-bangladesh-interim-government-sheikh-hasina

Muhammad Yunus sworn in as interim leader of Bangladesh

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/08/muhammad-yunus-arrives-bangladesh-take-office-interim-leader

Muhammad Yunus: ‘Business is a beautiful mechanism to solve problems’

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/may/24/muhammad-yunus-business-solve-problems

Bangladesh’s top court cuts job quotas that led to deadly student-led protests

Court overturns ruling reserving 30% of government jobs for independence war veterans and their relatives

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/21/bangladesh-court-scraps-job-quotas-student-led-protests

National curfew imposed in Bangladesh after student protesters storm prison:

Army to be deployed to keep order after demonstrators free hundreds of prisoners and country is hit by serious unrest

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/19/bangladesh-imposes-communications-blackout-as-protest-violence-continues

Bangladesh police given ‘shoot-on-sight’ orders amid national curfew

Two die and thousands hurt in crackdown on Bangladesh student protests

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/16/two-dead-and-thousands-injured-as-bangladesh-police-crack-down-on-anti-quota-protests

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/thousands-protest-in-bangladesh-against-the-ruling-party/ar-AA157yUk

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/22/bangladesh-opposition-crackdown-thousands-arrested

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/11/bangladesh-murders-bloggers-foreigners-religion

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/30/bangladesh-islamist-attacks-murder-gay-atheist-activists-dhaka

https://www.ibtimes.com/surging-crime-bleak-future-push-rohingya-bangladesh-risk-lives-sea-3660196

Bengali

আগস্ট 10 2024 আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব? জেগে উঠছে নতুন বাংলাদেশ

 একটি সফল বিপ্লবের প্রথম জিনিসগুলির মধ্যে, অত্যাচারী শাসকদের তাদের সিংহাসন থেকে নামিয়ে দেওয়ার পরে এবং জনগণের দ্বারা ক্ষমতা দখল করা হলে, 1793 সালে প্রতিষ্ঠিত একটি জননিরাপত্তা কমিটি এবং জনগণের মুক্তিদাতা এবং চ্যাম্পিয়ন হিসাবে রবসপিয়েরের নেতৃত্বে, যাতে প্রতিক্রিয়াশীল শক্তির হাত থেকে জনগণকে রক্ষা করা যায়। একটি স্বায়ত্তশাসিত অঞ্চল প্রতিষ্ঠার পরে এটি আমার প্রথম অগ্রাধিকার, এবং এর অভাবের কারণে আমাদের প্রথম স্বায়ত্তশাসিত অঞ্চল, 8 জুন 2020-এ সিয়াটলে প্রতিষ্ঠিত ক্যাপিটাল হিল AZ, ফ্যাসিস্ট সন্ত্রাসবাদী সংগঠন এবং তাদের পুলিশ এবং হোমল্যান্ড সিকিউরিটিদের আক্রমণে ব্যর্থ হয়েছিল। ভিন্নমতের রাষ্ট্রীয় দমনের অংশীদার। এবং এটি এমন একটি ভুল যা আমি আর কখনও করিনি।

 জনগণের ক্ষমতার সর্বজনীনীকরণের সাথে পরস্পরনির্ভরশীলতা হ’ল এমন প্রতিষ্ঠানের সৃষ্টি যা নিজেদের মধ্যে ক্ষমতার ভারসাম্য বজায় রাখে এবং নাগরিক হিসাবে আমাদের সমান্তরাল অধিকার এবং সমান মুক্ত সমাজে আমাদের সর্বজনীন মানবাধিকারের নিশ্চয়তা দেয়। এর মানে কি? একটি বিজয়ী বিপ্লবের প্রেক্ষাপটে, এবং সমাজের সম্পূর্ণ পুনর্কল্পনা এবং রূপান্তর এবং কীভাবে আমরা একসাথে মানুষ হতে বেছে নিই যা এটি নিয়ে আসে, আমি বলতে চাচ্ছি এবং সতর্ক করে দিচ্ছি যে আমরা যেন অত্যাচারী হয়ে না যাকে আমরা উৎখাত করেছি।

 এটি বিপ্লবী সংগ্রামের একটি পূর্বাভাসযোগ্য পর্যায়, বিশেষ করে ঔপনিবেশিক বিরোধী বিপ্লবের মতো যা একটি ঐতিহাসিক প্রতিধ্বনি হিসাবে ঘৃণ্য হাসিনা শাসনের জন্ম দিয়েছে এবং সংগ্রামের আরোপিত শর্তের পরিণতি। তবুও জেনে রাখলে তা এড়ানো যায়।

 আসুন আমরা পুণ্য প্রয়োগের জন্য কোন সৈন্যদল না পাঠাই।

 যেখানে আমাদেরকে শেখানো হয় গানের লিরিক্স হোয়ার ডু উই গো ফ্রম হিয়ার?, সিজন 6-এর বাফি দ্য ভ্যাম্পায়ার স্লেয়ার পর্ব 7-এ, ওয়ানস মোর উইথ ফিলিং, সম্ভবত এখনও পর্যন্ত তৈরি হওয়া যেকোনো টেলিনোভেলার সেরা মিউজিক্যাল এপিসোড;

 “আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব

আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব

যুদ্ধ শেষ,

এবং আমরা কিছুটা জিতেছি।

তাই আমরা আমাদের বিজয় উল্লাস ধ্বনি.

আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব।

পথ কেন অস্পষ্ট,

যখন আমরা জানি বাড়ি কাছাকাছি।

বুঝুন আমরা হাতে হাত রেখে যাব,

কিন্তু আমরা ভয়ে একা হাঁটব। (বলুন)

বলুন আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব।

কখন শেষ দেখা যায়,

তূরী কখন উল্লাস করে।

পর্দা বন্ধ, চুম্বনে ভগবান জানে,

আমরা বলতে পারি শেষ কাছাকাছি…

আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব

আমরা এখান থেকে কোথায় যাব

আমরা কোথায় যাব

এখান থেকে?”

 তবুও আশা থেকে যায় যখন সব হারিয়ে যায়, এবং তা উপহার বা অভিশাপ হয়ে উঠুক তা আমাদের হাতে। এই গানগুলি বিচ্ছিন্নতার আধুনিক প্যাথলজির কথা বলে, আমাদের সংহতির বিভাজন এবং ভাঙনের কথা বলে, শিখে নেওয়া অসহায়ত্ব এবং ভয়ের আধিপত্যের মাধ্যমে পরাধীনতার কথা বলে। তবে এখানেই গল্পের শেষ নয়, আমাদেরও নয়।

 ওনস মোর উইথ ফিলিং অবজেকশন দিয়ে নয়, স্লেয়ার এবং স্পাইকের মধ্যে দ্য কিস দিয়ে শেষ হয়, যে দানবকে সে শিকার করে। একটি খুব বিশেষ ধরণের দানব, যে তার পুরো সাত বছরের আর্কের গল্পের নায়কও; একজন যাকে তার অবস্থা এবং তার নিয়ন্ত্রণের বাইরের শক্তি দ্বারা দানবীয় করে তোলা হয়, যার বিরুদ্ধে সে মুক্তির জন্য সংগ্রাম করে এবং তার পছন্দ মতো নিজেকে পুনর্গঠন এবং সংজ্ঞায়িত করার জন্য, একজন দানব যে তার মানবতা এবং তার আত্মাকে পুনরায় দাবি করে। এই কারণেই আমরা তার আত্মপ্রকাশের বিশ বছর পর শোটি দেখতে থাকি; আমরা সবাই স্পাইক, অনুমোদিত পরিচয় এবং সিস্টেমিক মন্দতার সাথে নিজেদের মালিকানার জন্য টাইটানিক সংগ্রামে আবদ্ধ, সংগ্রামের চাপিয়ে দেওয়া শর্ত এবং মানুষের আদেশ, অর্থ এবং মূল্যের বিরুদ্ধে আমাদের দেহে লিখিত সত্যের বিপ্লব।

 বাফি দ্য ভ্যাম্পায়ার স্লেয়ার হল অন্তর্নিহিত মূল্য বা অর্থবিহীন বিশ্বের সার্ত্রিয়ান স্বাধীনতার রূপক, আমাদের শূন্যতার সন্ত্রাস বনাম সম্পূর্ণ স্বাধীনতার আনন্দ এবং সর্বোপরি আমাদের সত্যিকারের আত্মা ফিরিয়ে দেওয়ার জন্য ভালবাসার মুক্তির শক্তির একটি গান। .

 এভাবেই আমরা ফ্যাসিবাদী অত্যাচারকে দীর্ঘ খেলায় পরাজিত করি, মানবতার বিরুদ্ধে অপরাধ এবং গণতন্ত্রের ধ্বংসযজ্ঞের জন্য একটি হিসাব আনার পর; আসুন আমরা ঘৃণার জবাব দেই ভালোবাসা দিয়ে, বিভাজনের সংহতি দিয়ে, ভয়ের সাথে আশার সাথে, এবং আমাদের মানবতার ত্রুটি এবং বিশ্বের ভাঙ্গার নিরাময় নিয়ে আসি।

August 9 2024 Victory Britain: Solidarity Triumphs Over Division and Fascisms of Blood, Faith, and Soil

Solidarity has triumphed over division as the people of Britain unite to confront fascist riots, mob rule, terror, and destabilization in cities throughout the nation this week; it seems they will fight them on the beaches still.

     This was a crisis manufactured through the influence of social media as an instrument of propaganda of which Elon Musk and his insidious platform of fascist ideology and thought control X are among the primary criminals and provocateurs, though he and his pervasive house of illusions did not act alone but as part of a vast conspiracy whose immediate objective was to steal the power of Britain’s new liberal government to bring change. Musk orchestrated the riots to leverage the new British government. He should be tried for conspiracy in civil unrest and riot, and held responsible for its costs and crimes.

       My initial reaction to the riots was to ask; Where is Churchill when we need him? Now we may say; within the hearts of the British people, who have answered fear with hope and hate with love in the defense of each other.

     Much has been written of the British sense of fair play which mediates their society as a cohesive force, a praxis of moral values which still mean something here. Attend any sporting event and you will be startled at the support and goodwill offered the underdog and the outsider; reigning champions must earn their applause by feats of skill and daring, but there is nothing on earth like the acclamation which greets their challengers.

     This is how we can find our way out of the darkness together, as guarantors of each other’s liberty and universal human rights; this, this, this.

     When the forces of fascist tyranny come for us, as they always have and will, let them find not a humankind defeated with abjection, despair, and futility of action in the face of unanswerable power, but unconquerable in solidarity and the embrace of our uniqueness in a diverse and inclusive free society of equals.

        As written in The Guardian by Zarah Sultana, in an article entitled The enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy: The extraordinary show of community solidarity that pushed back the far right showed us how progressive politics can seize the future; “ Mosques under attack; hotels housing asylum seekers set alight; black and brown people set upon by racist mobs; “race checkpoints” set up on crossroads.

     My mum – terrified at what she’s seeing – pleads with me and my sisters: don’t go out unless you have to. Definitely don’t go out alone. It is a message heeded by one of my sister’s workplaces, which cancels her shifts, citing safety fears. She wears the hijab and going out puts her at risk.

     How did we get to this point, where far-right, Islamophobic racist violence is seen across the country and fear grips British Muslims and people of colour?

     The fuse may have been set alight by online disinformation and secretive social media channels, but this explosion of far-right violence has been decades in the making. And while Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (AKA Tommy Robinson) and his mob of far-right agitators are its immediate instigators, much of Britain’s political and media class is complicit in laying the groundwork for this eruption of hate.

     This truth of how we reached this point flips the normal classist narrative about racism in Britain. The reality is that racism isn’t a bottom-up expression of popular discontent, but a top-down project propagated by people in positions of power.

    Just think about how the billionaire-owned rightwing press drip-feeds hate into British politics, splashing fearmongering headlines across their papers: “Islamist plotters in schools across the UK” – the Telegraph; “1 in 5 Brit Muslims’ sympathy for jihadis” – the Sun; “Migrants spark housing crisis” – the Daily Mail.

     Or think how Conservative politicians normalise far-right rhetoric, dehumanising people and spreading hate. From “one nation” Conservatives such as David Cameron who as prime minister described migrants as a “swarm”, to the likes of Suella Braverman who as home secretary said there was a migrant “invasion”. Rishi Sunak’s “Stop the boats” slogan is now a far-right chant and just this week the Tory party leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick said the police should “immediately arrest” people shouting “Allahu Akbar” on the street, the Arabic phrase meaning “God is great” – the equivalent of a Christian saying “hallelujah”.

     This rhetoric was propagated further by the privately educated, former City trader Nigel Farage, who claims to be a man of the people. In the general election campaign, he said many Muslims didn’t share “British values” and this week promoted the “two-tier policing” conspiracy.

     But it’s not just rightwing politicians, pundits and publications at fault. So-called centrists too often refuse to push back against this hate as well, sometimes peddling the same dangerous tropes or dismissing the concerns of those subject to this hatred.

     I was confronted by this painful reality just this week. On Monday morning I was invited on to ITV’s Good Morning Britain to talk about the recent racist riots, only to be interrogated – and it did feel like an interrogation – about why I, a Muslim MP, thought it was important to call the recent racist violence Islamophobic. “Why is it important to use that specific word?” Kate Garraway repeatedly questioned me.

     Almost before I could answer, and behaving with the same sneering condescension he did throughout the segment, the former Labour shadow chancellor and now broadcaster Ed Balls repeatedly interrupted me, seemingly incredulous that I thought this hate should be called by its proper name. The show has now been hit with more than 8,200 Ofcom complaints about that morning’s episode, many of them about his handling of my interview.

     This wasn’t a one-off, even for Ed Balls. In the summer of 2010, as he set out his Labour leadership pitch in the Guardian, Balls blamed “eastern European migrants” for a “direct impact on the wages, terms and conditions of too many people”. He’s far from the only Labour figure to echo rightwing talking points: from then leader of the House of Commons Jack Straw, who in 2006 said that he asked veiled Muslim women to remove their veils in meetings with him, to the former Labour MP Jonathan Ashworth recently claiming asylum seekers can stay in hotels for “the rest of their lives”.

     These attitudes aren’t confined to public statements either. Martin Forde KC’s 2022 report on Labour’s internal processes found the party operated a “hierarchy of racism”, and he later revealed concerns about how it treats “anti-black racism and Islamophobia”. This finding accords with my own experience as the youngest Muslim MP.

     This is what I mean when I say much of Britain’s political and media class is complicit in the recent wave of racist, Islamophobic anti-migrant violence. From those who target Muslims and migrants with rabid enthusiasm, to those who fail to combat these rightwing narratives, responsibility for British politics being where it is now – racist riots and all – lies with this class.

     And it is no mystery why this class fails this test. When public services have been decimated and living standards have taken the biggest hit on record, people in positions of power play divide-and-rule to maintain their privilege.

     And so, an alternative to this morally bankrupt scapegoating is urgently needed – and on Wednesday night in towns and cities across Britain we saw the power of solidarity. Thousands upon thousands of people took to the streets, facing down the far right and defending their communities. Days earlier, trade unions such as the Fire Brigades Union, the RMT, the National Education Union and the Communication Workers Union had similarly taken a stand, calling on their branches and members to contact mosques and migrant centres to offer support and solidarity.

     These actions stand in a long tradition of working-class unity, reflecting an important reality: the enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy.

     Before it is too late, progressives across Britain need to rediscover this truth, pushing back against those who deny it and peddle racist hate.”

       As written by  David Olusoga in The Observer, in an article entitled There can be no excuses. The UK riots were violent racism fomented by populism: Culture wars have poisoned political debate, normalised Islamophobia and opened wounds that a generation blighted by nativism hoped had closed; “ Perhaps unhelpfully, we use the term “race riot” to describe two very different phenomena, each with its own dismal history. In the 1980s, it was the term attached to the uprisings that erupted among Black communities in Liverpool, Bristol, Leeds, London and elsewhere. Outbreaks of lawlessness and violence that were in large part a response to racial targeting by the police: harassment that aggravated existing disadvantages and intensified deep disillusionment, especially among the younger generation who had been born in Britain.

     However, a very different set of events with a far longer history has also been defined as race riots. The deadly disturbances of 1919 in Liverpool, Cardiff, Glasgow, London, Salford, Newport, Barry, Hull and South Shields, like the riots that came again to Liverpool in 1948, and those that broke out in 1958 in Nottingham and London’s Notting Hill.

     In each of the latter cases, the rioters were mobs of white men. The grievance that brought them on to the streets was the presence in their cities of non-white people. We must now add the summer of 2024 to the list of riots that were in essence organised violence against minority communities. My generation, brought up amid the endemic racism of the 1980s, had in recent years started to believe that our memories of being assaulted on the streets or besieged in our homes belonged firmly to a 20th-century Britain that we had long ago left behind. Now members of another generation of Britons from minority communities have traumatic memories that they too will have to process later in life.

     An understanding of the long and ugly history of the second type of British “race riot” might have helped some of the journalists and commentators who last week attempted to explain the causes of the wave of violence and looting we have just witnessed. The initial category error, made by much of the media, was to describe riots as protests. That misstep led to later difficulties. It convinced editors of the need to adopt the increasingly unviable stance of “bothsidesism” and to go in search of deeper social causes behind the violence. Race riots of the sort Britain experienced in 1919, 1948 and 1958 have always had the same motivations – racism and nativism.

     As brave reportage gave way to fumbling analysis, one fundamental reality was repeatedly overlooked. While there were horrific attacks on hotels housing asylum seekers, most of those targeted by the rioters were British citizens: members of communities with histories that go back three generations or more. When the mobs in Rotherham launched their sickening assault on a hotel, the racial slur spray-painted on to that hotel’s walls was the P-word, aimed not at asylum seekers but squarely at the established British Muslim community.

     Riots are not protests and there is a difference between motivations and excuses. Despite much that has been said, the riots of 2024 were not born of “legitimate grievances” about poverty, underinvestment and the breakdown of basic services, all supposedly deepened by mass immigration. The people attacked on the streets, those who had to defend their places of worship or their homes, are the neighbours of the rioters. They live in the same towns and suffer the consequences of the exact same poverty and underinvestment.

     Those who live in Britain’s long list of neglected towns – such as Gateshead, where I grew up, which ranks as the 47th poorest of England’s 317 local authorities – have no shortage of entirely legitimate grievances. But that is true irrespective of their race or religion. The Britain of 2024 is by some measures the most unequal society in Europe. Real wages have not increased since 2008 and the lowest-income British households are 20% poorer than the lowest-income families in France. But those bleak realities are the result of long-term political choices, not asylum seekers huddled terrified in hotels.

     The ideological fanaticism of the Thatcher government that limited the ability of local authorities to use income generated from the sale of council houses to build new properties, the ideologically driven impoverishment of local government by the Cameron-Osborne government and the self-inflicted wound of Brexit: these and other factors are what lie behind the shocking lack of access to basic resources – social housing, doctor’s appointments and dental surgeries. Immigration, rather than worsening that situation, is one of the few levers we have to increase access to medical care. Skilled immigration will also be needed if we are to build the millions of homes needed.

     To put the violence directed at British Muslims, Black Britons and asylum seeking down to “legitimate grievances” is to fall for one of the most toxic and intentionally divisive falsehoods in the populist handbook: the myth that class and race are diametrically opposed, the assertion that non-white people have no class identity. In this distorted world view, the true working class are the “white working class”, and the difficulties they face are not a consequences of political choices that affect everyone, irrespective of ethnicity, skin colour or faith, but of “elites” putting the needs of minority communities first. As if those minorities are not themselves working class. Boris Johnson’s disastrous government pushed that falsehood whenever it got the chance.

     However, a defining characteristic of the populist right – both politicians and their enablers at the tabloids and online – is an absolute, ironclad, unwavering refusal to take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions. They scuttled away from the wreckage of Brexit – always built on an economic fairytale – pointing accusatory fingers at others as their most cherished political project decimated Britain’s trade, shrank the economy and trashed our international reputation – as had been both predicted and forewarned. Now, eight years later, they are equally determined to sidestep responsibility for the long-term consequences of their short-term electoral strategies.

     A nation that was led for three years by a prime minister who used ethnic and racial slurs against Muslim women and African children, in which newspaper columnists were allowed to describe asylum seekers as “vermin” and in which those same papers constantly and deliberately conflated the separate issues of immigration and asylum: such a nation, sooner or later, was always going to face consequences.

     Just as with Brexit, the consequences of populism and culture wars were both foreseen and forewarned. Among the Cassandras whose prophecies went unheeded was the Conservative party’s former co-chairwoman Baroness Sayeeda Warsi. Three years ago she warned that “dog whistles win votes but destroy nations”. Last week, Warsi was even more robust in her criticism of former colleagues. As was the former counter-extremism tsar Dame Sara Khan. They and others have denounced the ways in which the last government poisoned political debate and normalised Islamophobia, while at the same time dismissing warnings of the growing dangers of far-right extremism.

     While the rioters and those willing to assign coherent political meanings to their criminality have spoken loudly, others have fallen deathly silent. As figures like Warsi took to the TV and podcast studios the politicians who are normally most vocal when there are divisions to be fomented and culture wars to be fought went awol. Kemi Badenoch’s retreat from the airwaves was so complete that even other Tories dubbed her disappearing act a “submarine” strategy.

     The profound injustices and stark regional disparities that have been wrongly ascribed as the motivations of the rioters urgently and obviously need to be addressed. But that reality has nothing directly to do with the actions of people who burned down a library and an advice centre, looted booze from a smashed-up Sainsbury’s and hurled rocks at Filipino nurses on their way to their shifts in NHS hospitals.

     Far-right groups, organising online, increasingly inspired by and connected to similar groups in the US and Europe, are not motivated by such concerns. They are, however, always eager to exploit them. The far-right already have an agenda; they always have. Disconnected from reason, it changes little over time. Behind the curtain of the dark web, in their grim chatrooms and Telegram forums, their true motivations are on display. They are not looking to address inequalities but to target those whom they will never accept as fellow Britons.

     In doing so, they, and those swept up in the chaos they foment, are willing to tear apart the nation to which they preposterously claim to be patriots.”

      As written in The Guardian by Zarah Sultana, in an article entitled The enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy:

      As I wrote in my post of June 3 2019, Glorifying Fascism: Trump visits Britain; Britain glorifies the fascism they once defied heroically as the figurehead of the global Fourth Reich conspiracy against freedom and equality deigns to parade about a nation he so obviously despises, hoping to influence the campaign of his proxies Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage to seize power over the fragile democracy of these islands. Sadly, Britain seems to have lost the will to fight them on the beaches.

     The capture of Britain by a tyranny would tip the balance of history toward a total collapse of western civilization; in the meanwhile Trump can gain temporary leverage by insulting its leaders and institutions, damaging its prestige, monkeywrenching the traditional Anglo-American Alliance, cheerleading racism and misogyny, and otherwise furthering the goal of crippling Europe economically and politically through factionalization and de-unification.

     In the words of the courageous standard bearer of Liberty and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan in the Observer: “Praising the “very fine people on both sides” when torch-wielding white supremacists and antisemites marched through the streets clashing with anti-racist campaigners. Threatening to veto a ban on the use of rape as a weapon of war. Setting an immigration policy that forcefully separates young children from their parents at the border. The deliberate use of xenophobia, racism and “otherness” as an electoral tactic. Introducing a travel ban to a number of predominately Muslim countries. Lying deliberately and repeatedly to the public.

     No, these are not the actions of European dictators of the 1930s and 40s. Nor the military juntas of the 1970s and 80s. I’m not talking about Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong-un. These are the actions of the leader of our closest ally, the president of the United States of America. This is a man who tried to exploit Londoners’ fears following a horrific terrorist attack on our city, amplified the tweets of a British far-right racist group, denounced as fake news robust scientific evidence warning of the dangers of climate change, and is now trying to interfere shamelessly in the Conservative party leadership race by backing Boris Johnson because he believes it would enable him to gain an ally in Number 10 for his divisive agenda.

     Donald Trump is just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat. The far right is on the rise around the world, threatening our hard-won rights and freedoms and the values that have defined our liberal, democratic societies for more than seventy years. Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Matteo Salvini in Italy, Marine Le Pen in France and Nigel Farage here in the UK are using the same divisive tropes of the fascists of the 20th century to garner support, but are using new sinister methods to deliver their message. And they are gaining ground and winning power and influence in places that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.”

Anti-racism protesters gather across England – in pictures: Thousands of people stood up against racism in towns and cities across the country

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/gallery/2024/aug/07/anti-racism-protesters-gather-across-england-in-pictures

The far right promised violence and mayhem last night – but decency took back the streets

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/08/the-far-right-promised-violence-and-mayhem-last-night-but-decency-took-back-the-streets

United against hate: England’s counter-protesters left with little to counter

From Newcastle to London to Bristol, anti-racist demonstrators stood up against threat of further racist riots

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/07/anti-racism-protesters-fill-streets-of-english-cities-as-far-right-threat-recedes

There can be no excuses. The UK riots were violent racism fomented by populism

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/10/there-can-be-no-excuses-the-uk-riots-were-violent-racism-fomented-by-populism

The enemy of the working class travels by private jet, not migrant dinghy

The justice system is rising to challenge of UK riots – despite dire Tory legacy

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/10/the-justice-system-is-rising-to-challenge-of-uk-riots-despite-dire-tory-legacy

More than 700 arrests made and 302 people charged over riots in England

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/09/uk-riots-arrests-made-and-about-people-charged-say-police

Riots will set back efforts to rebuild Britain’s broken justice system, minister warns

https://www.theguardian.com/law/article/2024/aug/10/riots-will-set-back-efforts-to-rebuild-britains-broken-justice-system-minister-warns

What do asylum seekers and refugees make of the eruption of far-right violence in the UK? We asked them

You know who else should be on trial for the UK’s far-right riots? Elon Musk

Jonathan Freedland

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/09/uk-far-right-riots-elon-musk-x

Elon Musk’s journey from humanitarian to poster of rightwing memes

X owner has cited transgender daughter Vivian’s transition as reason for shift, blaming ‘the woke mind virus’

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/01/donald-trump-like-20th-century-fascist-says-sadiq-khan

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/01/donald-trump-state-visit-red-carpet-unbritish

August 8 2024 On This International Cat Day, Let Us Bring the Chaos, Run Amok, and Be Ungovernable

     Cats do not obey; this is the most important truth about what it means to be a cat, and why I love them.

     Non Serviam, as Milton’s rebel angel declares.

     The second most important thing about being a cat is their inherently pluralistic and ambiguous nature; dual aspected figures of both Maat, Egyptian goddess of motherhood and nurturance, but also a lioness and fierce hunter and protector in her form as Sekmet.

     These are the defining terms and limits of the taxonomy and identity of cats; playful and purring, hedonistic and boundlessly loving, whose games are those of an ambush predator with sabre like claws hidden in the soft paws which knead us into nests to dream upon.

    Humans and cats have evolved together and shaped one another in partnership since the pyramids of Egypt, where their role was to guard our dreams from nightmares, demons, hungry ghosts and other symbolized and archetypal threats and legacies of our history. This is why to dream with their chosen human is the greatest joy and signifier of status among cats, with grooming and the offering of food close seconds.

     As artifacts of this partnership cats have a complex culture which includes trade languages used only to communicate with humans, songs which must be learned from other cats and which are proof not only of sentience and sapient intelligence but also of culture.

      So we have taught them how to interact and communicate with us; what have we learned from them?

     From the independence and agency of cats we have become unique individuals, emerged from group identity, and forged souls or persona, a word which originates with the theatrical mask of Greek drama as roles we perform in the construction of ourselves. As Julian Jaynes teaches us in The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, the birth of the human arrives with the silence of the gods.

     From cats as figures of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves we learn to inhabit our bodies, claim ourselves, and embrace those truths written in our flesh.

      Part of this essential wildness is that each and every cat bears within it a Great Cat; both the behavior and genetics of cats is nearly identical to that of wild tigers. There is less genetic drift between our cats and tigers than there is between different breeds of dogs.

     All cats are trophy hunters; my partner Dolly tells of her finding a circle of mouse skulls under a building on her childhood family farm, exactly like the lions in the great film The Ghost and the Darkness who artfully displayed human remains in their den, and like those in the cave of a tiger with whom I danced in Burma long ago. In this too we humans and cats are much alike.

     A cat may claim you as a family member by touching noses or enjoy the mutual grooming rituals of being petted or swirling your hair with its sandpaper tongue, but we do not own them, nor they us.

      As we are taught in the film Breakfast at Tiffanys, the difference as a border of identity and an interface of connection between owning each other and belonging to each other is both a ground of revolutionary struggle and a space of free creative play.

      I have practiced dancing the cat inside as martial arts for fifty years now, first as Northern Shao Lin Tiger style and for three decades as Raja Harimau which hybridizes Chinese influences and the pan-Hindu diaspora cult of the Rakshasa weretiger demons with the fighting arts of the Minangkabau people of Sumatra with whom I once lived, the latter based on direct observation of wild tigers in nature, and is pervasive throughout the Islamic diaspora among Indonesian and Malay silat fighting arts propagated by Sufi warrior brotherhoods including my own Naqshbandi order. You may recognize its unique karambit knife which mimics the dewclaw of a tiger from Mazakine’s knives in the telenovela Lucifer. It is used reversed gripped in the manner of an Omani Khanjar and made ubiquitous by Arab sailors as both a rigger’s tool and weapon, sharp on the inner curve, as a weapon of surprise, stealth, leverage, and deceptive angles of movement. A Silat warrior can dissect an enemy with it in closing or as a ground fighting and grappling weapon, where the karambit has special advantages of angle, like a tiger with its prey.

     Freedom and wildness as states of being define the cat, and signpost its power as an archetypal figure of ourselves as Unconquered beings and as Living Autonomous Zones. And its praxis has political implications, which is why cats were demonized by the Church as familiars of witches, a witch being nothing more or less than a human who owns themselves and submits to nothing; no gods and no masters as Blanqui and Kropotkin popularized the Anarchist motto in the 1880’s, whose symbols include Le Chat Noir.  

      Herein I imagine anarchism as an art of total freedom in the context of the Anarchist Trilogy of William S. Burroughs, who was among the literati collected by my father and a kind and wise mentor of my childhood.

      The Cat Inside, first of Burrough’s Anarchist Trilogy, is a delightful and precious allegory of freedom and rebellion, a meditation on values which extends Nietzsche’s analysis of master- slave psychology to a philosophy of anarchist liberation, and references Nietzsche’s interpreters Nikos Kazantzakis, Karl Jaspers, Maurice Blanchot, C.G. Jung, and Gilles Deleuze. Burroughs wrote it in direct reply to Dr Suess’ reimagination of the god of Chaos, a variant of whose name I bear, Janus, as The Cat in the Hat, also influenced by Soseki’s hilarious, strange, and uncategorizable novel of Japan The Cat Inside.

      The Revised Boy Scout Manual, second of the trilogy, is a brilliant parody and a manual of anarchist revolt and liberation from systems of oppression. Along with T.E. Lawrence’s Seven Pillars of Wisdom and the works of Mao and Che Guevara, it is among the finest classics of direct action and guerrilla warfare one might consult. I believe he wrote some of it, being a collection of recorded spoken word poetry, for me when I was an actual Boy Scout. I do hope I have made good use of his wisdom in making mischief for tyrants and revolutionary struggle.

     The Wild Boys envisions feral youths in rebellion against the Authority that created them, a dystopian future in which man’s animal nature has been  betrayed by civilization but which also has the power to redeem him, the final part of his Anarchist trilogy which extends his recurrent theme of werewolves as symbolic of our essential wildness and unconquerable nature and a type of Nietzschean Superman; beyond good and evil. As he wrote it during the period of his visits, I have often wondered how much of it was drawn from my father’s ideas and the claim of our family history that we are not human but werewolves, with the blood of ancient terrors, and had been driven out of Europe for that reason; Martin Luther referred to my ancestors as Brides of the Dragon, and we were driven out of Bavaria in 1586 at the beginning of a forty-four year period of witchcraft persecutions. He was writing it during the Stonewall Riots, which may be a more direct context as a fictionalization of the witness of history. It is also filled with episodes from the glory days of his youth and set in Mexico and Morocco as imaginal realms; the Surrealist transcendence of dreams and ecstatic vision and the degradation of H.G. Wells’ The Island of Doctor Moreau here mingle and intertwine.

     When I asked him, at the age of ten or eleven, if I was in his book and what he was writing about, he said; “Freedom, nature as truth and civilization as addiction to wealth and power and theft of the soul, and how our pasts get mixed up with our futures.”

     The Wild Boys reimagines The Egyptian Book of the Dead, of which his fellow Surrealist and poet Philip Lamantia was a scholar, also the subject of his final novel The Western Lands as is H. P. Lovecraft’s The Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath which was among its direct  models, references Octave Mirbeau, Celine, Bataille, Genet, and extends de Sade and Rousseau’s ideal of the natural man as uncorrupted by civilization and unlimited by its boundaries, as truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh, in a reversal of Freud’s ideology of civilization as restraint of our nature which he so deliciously called “polymorphosly perverse”. David Bowie created his character of Ziggy Stardust based on The Wild Boys; here dance Bataille’s cult of Nietzsche and Lovecraft’s gods of madness.

      All true art exalts and defiles.

      Let us embrace the wildness of nature, and the wildness of ourselves.

      On this International Cat Day, let us bring the Chaos, run amok, and be Ungovernable

“The Cat Inside” film narrated by WSB

The Cat Inside, William S. Burroughs

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/257498.The_Cat_Inside?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_14

Here is the link to my FB album Cats of Dollhouse Park

The Ghost and the Darkness film trailer

William S. Burroughs’ “The Revised Boy Scout Manual”: An Electronic Revolution, William S. Burroughs

The Wild Boys: A Book of the Dead, William S. Burroughs

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23930.The_Wild_Boys?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_13

The Cat in the Hat, Dr. Seuss

I Am a Cat, Natsume Sōseki

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/62772.I_Am_a_Cat?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_10

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, Julian Jaynes

The Island of Dr. Moreau, H.G. Wells

            Anarchy, a reading list

On Anarchism, by Noam Chomsky

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22558046-on-anarchism

We Do Not Fear Anarchy—We Invoke It: The First International and the Origins of the Anarchist Movement, by Robert Graham

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23282125-we-do-not-fear-anarchy-we-invoke-it

Black Flame: The Revolutionary Class Politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism

by Michael Schmidt (Goodreads Author), Lucien Van Der Walt

Cartography of Revolutionary Anarchism, by Michael Schmidt

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16057170-cartography-of-revolutionary-anarchism

Anarchism, by Daniel Guérin, Noam Chomsky (Introduction)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51624.Anarchism

Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism, by Peter H. Marshall

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/880355.Demanding_the_Impossible

Communal Luxury: The Political Imaginary of the Paris Commune, by Kristin Ross

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22716641-communal-luxury

On Anarchism, by Mikhail Bakunin, Sam Dolgoff (Editor/Translator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/203890.On_Anarchism

The Method of Freedom: An Errico Malatesta Reader

by Errico Malatesta (Editor), Paul Sharkey (Translation), Davide Turcato (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17675098-the-method-of-freedom

Property is Theft!: A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Anthology

by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Iain Mckay (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9482965-property-is-theft

Direct Struggle Against Capital: A Peter Kropotkin Anthology

by Pyotr Kropotkin, Iain Mckay (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17675240-direct-struggle-against-capital

Mutual Aid, by Pyotr Kropotkin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51306.Mutual_Aid

An Anarchist FAQ, Vol. 1, by Iain Mckay

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2626552-an-anarchist-faq-vol-1

An Anarchist FAQ: Volume 2, by Iain Mckay (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13592232-an-anarchist-faq

The Spanish Anarchists: The Heroic Years 1868-1936, by Murray Bookchin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/312964.The_Spanish_Anarchists

The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy

by Murray Bookchin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/312960.The_Ecology_of_Freedom

Manifesto of the Democratic Civilization Series, by Abdullah Öcalan

https://www.goodreads.com/series/246784-manifesto-of-the-democratic-civilization

Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire, by David Graeber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/978934.Possibilities

Revolutions in Reverse: Essays on Politics, Violence, Art, and Imagination,

by David Graeber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13048162-revolutions-in-reverse

The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement, by David Graeber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13330433-the-democracy-project

Direct Action: An Ethnography, by David Graeber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2543048.Direct_Action

Revolutions in Reverse: Essays on Politics, Violence, Art, and Imagination,

by David Graeber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13048162-revolutions-in-reverse

Anarchism and Its Aspirations, by Cindy Milstein

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6919727-anarchism-and-its-aspirations

Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas, Volume 1: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300CE-1939), by Robert Graham (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/168902.Anarchism

The Emergence of the New Anarchism (1939-1977) (Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas, Volume Two), by Robert Graham (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6548316-the-emergence-of-the-new-anarchism-1939-1977

Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas, Volume 3: The New Anarchism (1974-2012), by Robert Graham (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6473171-anarchism

                       Guerilla War, a reading list

On Guerrilla Warfare, Mao Zedong

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/113625.On_Guerrilla_Warfare

Guerrilla Warfare, Ernesto Che Guevara

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/153117.Guerrilla_Warfare

Fundamentals Of Guerrilla Warfare, Abdul Haris Nasution

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15930141-fundamentals-of-guerrilla-warfare?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_58

Seven Pillars of Wisdom: A Triumph, T.E. Lawrence

Behind The Burma Road, William R. Peers, Dean Brelis

People’s War People’s Army: The Viet Cong Insurrection Manual for Underdeveloped Countries, Võ Nguyên Giáp

                Counterinsurgency Warfare, a reading list

The Petraeus Doctrine: The Field Manual on Counterinsurgency Operations,

Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Publication 3-24

The Insurgents: David Petraeus and the Plot to Change the American Way of War, Fred Kaplan

Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Ukraine, David Petraeus, Andrew Roberts

The Transformation of War, Martin van Creveld

Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice, David Galula

August 7 2024 Who Is Future Vice President Walz?

     If you want to see the dynamics and differing angles of illumination and view between Kamala Harris and her chosen running mate Tim Walz, I refer you to the iconic scene between Chamberlain, playing the part of Kamala Harris the lawyer who began her political career by ending the death penalty in California, and Sergeant Buster Kilrain playing Tim Walz, a Sergeant Major and career serviceman who is now our future Vice President because he saw his fellow Americans in need of help, and could not walk away.

     As I said in my endorsement speech for Biden and Harris in the last election, we need leaders who will place their lives in the balance with those of the powerless, and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.

     Tim Walz did exactly that for twenty years with our flag on his shoulder patch, and he will do this for us as our Vice President just the same.  

     As written by Rachel Leingang in The Guardian, in an article entitled Who is Tim Walz? The governor with a history of winning over Republicans: The Minnesota governor has delivered progressive policies in his state and has a history of swaying Republican districts; “Minnesota’s governor captured the internet’s attention and swayed Democrats’ messaging by succinctly summing up how he views Republicans: they’re weird.

     Clips of Tim Walz have spread widely, helping cement him as Kamala Harris’s pick to run alongside her as vice-president.

     It’s not just the “weird” of it all: he’s been able to run through a list of what Democrats want, and what he’s done as governor during a banner time for Democrats in his state, that articulates to voters what they would be voting for, not just the danger of what they’re voting against. He speaks plainly and pragmatically, showing the commonsense policies his party stands for.

     Walz, 60, was born and raised in small-town Nebraska. He became a teacher, first in China, then in Nebraska and finally in Mankato, Minnesota, where he taught geography and coached the high school football team. He was the faculty adviser for the school’s first gay-straight alliance chapter in 1999, long before Democrats nationally stood for gay rights. He also served in the army national guard for 24 years, enlisting at age 17, a role that took him around the country and on a deployment to Europe. And like JD Vance, Walz has a penchant for Diet Mountain Dew.

     He had a whole life before politics.

     “Frankly, a lot of politicians are just not normal people,” said David Hogg, a gun control advocate and a Walz fan. “They just don’t know how to talk to normal people.”

     He comes across as what he is: a straight-talking teacher, America’s youth football coach. He’s “right out of central casting as the way you think of Minnesota governor would be like”, said Michael Brodkorb, the former deputy chair of the Minnesota Republican party.

     Walz first ran for office in 2006 in a Republican-leaning congressional district, knocking off the incumbent in an upset. He kept the district until 2016, dispatching Republicans over and over. In 2018, he ran for governor and won, then defended the seat successfully in 2022.

     He’s now the chair of the Democratic Governors Association, a perch that has given him a national profile in the past year as he has stumped first for Biden and now Harris. His appearances in recent weeks have taken off, putting his name on the VP shortlist and his tone center stage for Democrats.

     In Minnesota, Democrats secured a narrow government trifecta in 2022, taking both chambers of the legislature and the governorship, and Walz and his colleagues in the legislature got to work, delivering a laundry-list of progressive policy wins such as free school meals, abortion protections, gun restrictions and legal marijuana.

     If Democrats want to see what their party governing would look like, Minnesota is the example. But maybe the policies would be too liberal for the national stage, one TV interviewer posed to Walz.

     “What a monster! Kids are eating and having full bellies so they can go learn, and women are making their own healthcare decisions,” Walz said jokingly.

     Hogg pointed to a speech Walz gave when Trump came to Minnesota last week, in which Walz was dressed down – like a midwestern dad – in a camo hat and a T-shirt, as an example of how he’s down-to-earth. The outfit caught attention online for not looking like a politician’s attempt to look like a regular person, but just like Walz’s regular clothes. “He might run for Vice President or he might clean the garage. It’s the weekend, anything can happen,” one tweet quipped.

     “Tim’s just a freaking down-home guy,” said Tim Ryan, a former Democratic US representative from Ohio who worked with Walz in Congress and worked out alongside him in the House gym.

     Ryan called to mind a recent clip in which Walz mentioned that Minnesota ranked in the top three for happiest states in the nation. “Isn’t that really the goal here? For some joy? When he mentioned that I was like, dang man, that’s really good. That’s really good, because it gets us out of the political space and into the human being space.”

     It’s part of a vibe shift Democrats are feeling since Joe Biden announced he wouldn’t seek re-election. There’s less focus on the dire consequences of electing Trump again – though those consequences are certainly still part of the motivation – and more on detailing what Democrats want to do if they win.

     “Fear and anger is such a low vibration,” Ryan said. “It’s just a negative vibration. And I think what Tim talked about, like the hope of things to come, and the hope of what we’ve actually accomplished. We can do more. That’s optimistic, that’s a high vibration.”

    Ryan is on text chains with former members who served with Walz and are excited to see him in the spotlight and were rooting for him to be tapped as vice-president. House Democrats were also reportedly advocating for him to be Harris’s pick.

     Heidi Heitkamp, the former senator of North Dakota, said Walz’s plainspokenness works because it’s real. Contrast that with Trump’s VP pick: “There’s an inauthenticity about JD Vance that is the antithesis of what Tim Walz is. Tim is the most authentically kind of normal person you’re going to meet, and he has a background that is uniquely situated in these times, especially for people in my part of the country.”

     Heitkamp and Walz got to know each other flying back and forth between DC and the upper midwest. She felt an instant recognition of the kind of person he was that she thinks translates throughout the midwest.

     “I met Tim Walz and I knew Tim Walz,” she said. “I didn’t have to say, what’s this guy all about and what’s his agenda? I knew his agenda, because I had high school teachers just like him, who cared about their students and cared about their community.”

     Progressives in Minnesota, who have at times clashed with Walz on policy, were still rooting for him, too. Elianne Farhat, the executive director of TakeAction MN, said she and her organization had disagreed deeply with Walz over the years, but that he was a person who will move and change his position based on feedback. He evolves.

     She and others pointed to his position on guns. Walz is a gun owner and a hunter who previously received endorsements and donations from the National Rifle Association and had an A rating from the group. But he shifted: he gave donations from the group to charity after the mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017, and he supported an assault weapons ban after the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida. While governor, he has signed bills into law that restrict guns. He now has an F rating from the NRA.

     “We’re not electing our saviors. We’re not electing perfect people. We’re electing people who we can make hard decisions with, we can negotiate with, and who are serious about getting things done for people. And Governor Walz has shown that pretty strongly the last couple years as governor of Minnesota,” Farhat said.

     The biggest drawback for Walz – and a perk for other contenders on Harris’ shortlist, such as the Pennsylvania governor, Josh Shapiro – was his geography. Minnesota is not a swing state, though Trump has said he thinks he can win it. Biden being replaced on the top of the ticket probably takes the state out of contention, though.

     Republicans will also surely bring up the 2020 protests after George Floyd’s murder by police, tying Walz, who was governor at the time, to the aftermath.

     Still, his background as a teacher and a veteran from a congressional district that typically voted for Republicans helps make his case. “I mean, if you want the blue wall, Tim Walz is the blue wall,” Hogg said.

     And Walz can win. His electoral record shows his ability to bring in coalitions of voters, from progressives to moderate Republicans, Brodkorb said. Then after winning, he has shown he knows how to get results.

     “It is a part of his political DNA to be able to soften up his critics, win over people and win in Republican areas,” Brodkorb said.

     Even if Harris hadn’t picked Walz to be on the ticket, his messaging shift would have continued. “Weird” is sticking around. The Harris campaign has used it. “It’s really gotten under the Republicans’ skin, which is, I think, a sign as to how effective it is,” Brodkorb said.

     Trump himself responded to the charge. “Nobody’s ever called me weird. I’m a lot of things, but weird I’m not.”

     “No one called Trump weird until Tim Walz did,” Heitkamp said. “And it resonated for a reason, because he is weird. I mean, anyone who talks about Hannibal Lecter, that’s not normal behavior. I think that there’s been people who have tried to intellectualize Donald Trump, and Tim just cut through it all and said, ‘This guy’s not normal. This is weird.’”

     While Trump surrogates often spend their time “doing cleanup on aisle five”, Walz can be out talking to voters about what he’s accomplished in Minnesota and what Democrats envision for the country, Heitkamp said. It’s a message that resonates with the base, but also swing voters who struggle with childcare costs and tuition, two of the issues Walz has tackled in his state.

     “Being anti-Trump can’t be what the Democratic message is,” she said. “The Democratic message has to be about how we will govern differently from Republicans.”

     As written by Chris Stein in The Guardian, in an article entitled Tim Walz: charismatic running mate to help Harris make case against Trump; “As Democrats weathered the upheaval caused by Joe Biden’s decision to end his re-election campaign and hand the reins to his vice-president, Kamala Harris, a party stalwart piped up with a suggestion: start calling Donald Trump “weird”.

     The pioneer of the attack, which was also deployed by Harris’s campaign, was the Minnesota governor, Tim Walz, who insisted to CNN that “it’s not a name-calling or tagging him with it. It’s an observation.

      “And I didn’t come up with it,” he added, noting that he had heard “relatives and Republicans” use the adjective to describe the former president.

     Walz is now expected to spend the next three months telling the country all about the weirdness of Trump and his running mate, the Ohio senator JD Vance, after Harris named the Minnesota governor as her pick for vice-president on Tuesday. Although the 60-year-old is one of the least nationally known of the options Harris was considering, and does not hail from a state viewed as crucial to deciding the election, he is expected to assist Harris in making the case for her policies, and convincing voters to reject the extreme remaking of the US government that Trump says is required.

     Now in his second term as governor, the former congressman and high school teacher brings to the ticket a record of progressive policymaking, a somewhat sympathetic view towards pro-Palestine protesters, and a distinctly Minnesotan style of communication the campaign could use in its efforts to win the nearby swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

     “If Donald Trump and JD Vance are irritated that Kamala Harris smiles and laughs, they’re really going to be irritated by Tim Walz,” Melissa Hortman, the Democratic speaker of Minnesota’s house of representatives, told the Guardian.

     “He is a cheerful person, he’s a positive, upbeat person, he’s charismatic. He can get a crowd going.”

     Walz emerged as Harris’s pick after a search lasting two weeks that saw the vice-president also consider a group that included the Pennsylvania governor, Josh Shapiro, and Arizona senator Mark Kelly. The choice of Walz drew praise from across the Democratic party’s ideological spectrum.

     The progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Harris made an “excellent decision”, while Joe Manchin, the West Virginia senator who recently left the party and is best known for hamstringing Biden’s proposals to fight child poverty and more aggressively combat climate change, said: “I can think of no one better than Governor Walz to help bring our country closer together and bring balance back to the Democratic party.”

     Republicans responded to Walz’s selection by posting on social media images of the protests the rocked Minneapolis four years ago after George Floyd’s murder, reminders of the governor’s support for a law allowing undocumented migrants to obtain driver’s licenses, plus a massive Covid relief scandal that took place during his administration.

     With Trump making fears of crime and unrest a centerpiece of his platform, Amy Koch, a Minnesota Republican strategist and former state senate majority leader, said the unrest that followed Floyd’s killing will probably form a plank of the party’s counter-attack to Walz’s candidacy.

     “There’s a lot of video of five days of chaos in Minneapolis,” Koch told the Guardian. “There’s a lot of video of, like, literally, reporters covering it, saying: where is Governor Walz?” The governor did deploy the national guard, but Republicans say he did not do so soon enough.

     Walz’s main competitor for the spot of running mate was Shapiro, who might have reignited tensions among Democrats over his policy positions on issues such as education, fracking and Israel-Gaza.

     Biden’s support for Benjamin Netanyahu and the invasion of Gaza sparked a backlash that some of his allies feared could have cost him victory in swing states such as Michigan, home to a large Arab-American population. Some pro-Palestine activists have signaled a willingness to give Harris a chance to win back their votes, but were wary of Shapiro, who took a hardline stance against pro-Palestinian protests.

     The backlash to his potential candidacy, which included the formation of a group called “No Genocide Josh”, itself attracted claims of antisemitism, with many pointing out that Shapiro, who is Jewish, has condemned Netanyahu and that Walz has a similar record of support for Israel and on campus protests.

     Walz took a different rhetorical tack on other protests. When tens of thousands of Minnesotans voted “uncommitted” in the Democratic primary in protest against the Biden administration’s policies towards Gaza, his response was warm, with the governor calling them “civically engaged”.

     “They are asking to be heard and that’s what they should be doing,” Walz said at the time. “Their message is clear that they think this is an intolerable situation and that we can do more. And I think the president is hearing that.”

     After his selection, the progressive Jewish organization IfNotNow said it remained “concerned” by Walz’s past association with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) and votes in Congress to approve military aid to Israel.

     Supporters of Shapiro had argued that putting him on the ticket would help Harris win Pennsylvania, perhaps the most crucial swing state this election. But Christopher J Devine, a political science professor at the University of Dayton, said his research showed there was no guarantee of that happening.

    The choice of running mate was the last major piece of unfinished business before Harris, who quickly consolidated the support necessary to become the presumptive Democratic nominee after Biden withdrew last month.

    As hotly anticipated as Harris’s decision was, Devine said it was unlikely to prove decisive in beating Trump and Vance.

     “VPs can have an effect on the election. It’s not always in the way we expect, and the magnitude of that effect tends not to be very large,” said Devine, the author of Do Running Mates Matter? The Influence of Vice Presidential Candidates in Presidential Elections.

     If elected, Harris would be the first female president and the first south Asian president, and only the second African American, after Barack Obama. Her shortlist of running mates was composed entirely of white men after the Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, said she was not interested in the job.

     While Devine said that may have been a calculation on Harris’s part – besides Obama, every US president has been a white man – he said it did not mean she had no choice but to select a running mate from that demographic.

     “Kamala Harris could have chosen Gretchen Whitmer if she believed that there was strength in that identity of being a woman running for the presidency,” he said. “But I suspect her calculation, or a lot of her team, they might have weighed on her to … say that it just can’t be done. It’s too much for people to handle.”

     Trump has made dissatisfaction with both the Biden administration and the country’s entire direction a theme of his campaign, going so far as to say that the country is being “destroyed”. William G Howell, director of the University of Chicago’s Center for Effective Government, said Walz will be put in a position to articulate the case against that worldview.

     “His is the language of us coming together and … setting to work on hard problems,” Howell said. “And so, both in tone and in substance, he’s going to be able to clearly distinguish himself from from the kind of rhetoric emanating from Trump.”

     As written by John Zogby in The Guardian, in an article entitled In choosing Tim Walz, Kamala Harris went for policies not electoral votes: Harris has chosen someone from and of the midwest and someone who is no ‘hillbilly’ with fluid values; “Vice-President Kamala Harris has selected the Minnesota governor, Tim Walz, as her running mate and this big decision reflects more conventional history than inside-the-DC-beltway convention wisdom. While pundits focused mainly on which possible choice could help her ticket win a battleground state, their focus was on either Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania (19 electoral votes) or Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona (11 electoral votes). In this hotly competitive race, either selection made good sense in the scramble for a majority of the electoral college.

     But we have to go back to 1960 when the young Massachusetts senator John Kennedy picked the Texas senator and majority leader, Lyndon Johnson, to be his running mate to find the last time selecting a candidate who actually brought a state with him was the dominant concern. Johnson and Kennedy hated each other but the ticket carried Texas, so who cared?

    Since that time, other factors were in the ascendance. The very conservative governor of California Ronald Reagan opted for the more moderate, establishment, comfortable George HW Bush in 1980. Bush brought credibility and possibly modulation. A decade later, after Reagan and Bush were the two oldest men ever to serve in the White House, 46-year-old Bill Clinton chose 44-year-old Al Gore.

     Gore brought much-needed Washington experience, even more intellectual heft, and above all the image of youthful vigor to promote the mantra of change. In one of their first public appearances together, Clinton and Gore got off the campaign bus and played catch with a football, a powerful image of a new boomer generation ready to go.

     In 2000, Governor George W Bush, a successful and moderate Texas governor of Texas, needed an insider with gravitas and knowledge of the workings inside the nation’s capital. Actually, Dick Cheney, who Bush had appointed to conduct a vice-presidential search, chose himself.

     And eight years later, Senator Barack Obama, barely in the US Senate, was not thinking of Joe Biden’s state of Delaware with only three (comfortably Democratic) electoral voters. Rather, Biden brought decades of legislative and foreign policy experience, the wisdom of age, and hardworking ethnic working-class roots to the table.

     So, Governor Walz is much more than the man from Minnesota (10 electoral votes). Actually, he was born in rural Nebraska, taught high school and coached football in a small town, has served almost six terms in the House of Representatives and is into his second term as governor. He is wildly popular among his fellow Democratic governors who selected him to be their leader. He has lived and led since 1996 in Mankato, Minnesota, population 45,000. Walz has been on the inside but more significantly he has never left the outside. Walz is seen as an appealing option for independents and moderate Democrats as a working-class politician with a rural background, as well as a favorite among the progressive wing of the Democratic party who were not keen on either Shapiro or Kelly.

     Before running for office, Walz, a graduate of a state college in Nebraska, served in the army national guard. He worked as a teacher, first on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, then in China and later as a high school teacher in Mankato, Minnesota, south of Minneapolis. As a teacher, he was assigned the duty of supervising the cafeteria during lunch. (I suppose he can do anything!)

     As governor, he has passed tuition-free meals at participating state universities, enshrined abortion rights into state law, provided protections for gender-affirming healthcare, signed a bill last May expanding voting rights in Minnesota for formerly incarcerated residents, and in 2020, oversaw the state’s response to both the Covid-19 pandemic and police brutality protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police.

     He offers a combination of a rural/small-town family man, rooted in traditional values, while also pushing through legislative programs that are near-and-dear to the progressive base of the party. While his views on the war in Gaza are not out of step with mainstream congressional Democrats, it is notable that he expressed support for and understanding of the college demonstrators’ empathy for the suffering victims of the Gaza war.

     By selecting Walz, the vice-president has accomplished a few important things. First, she has chosen someone from and of the midwest and rural America, moving away from the big city/coastal elitism that the party has come to represent. Second, she has declared her independence from the Biden administration’s premise of Israel first and always as Middle Eastern policy. And third, she has chosen someone who is no “hillbilly” with fluid values, but an authentic midwesterner. We now have a possible injection of “prairie progressivism” v “hillbilly/Mar-a-Lago populism”. This will be no small debate.”

Harris as Chamberlain and Walz as Sergeant Buster Kilrain, in the film Gettysburg

Who is Tim Walz? The governor with a history of winning over Republicans

The Minnesota governor has delivered progressive policies in his state and has a history of swaying Republican districts

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/tim-walz-vp-kamala-harris

Tim Walz: charismatic running mate to help Harris make case against Trump

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/tim-walz-vp-running-mate-analysis

The Tim Walz cheat sheet: 10 things to know about Harris’s VP pick

Get up to speed with the Minnesota governor – what should you know about him and how do you pronounce his name?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/tim-walz-what-to-know-harris-vp

AOC on Walz and his chance to unify the Progressives with the rest of the Democratic Party

In choosing Tim Walz, Kamala Harris went for policies not electoral votes

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/07/in-choosing-tim-walz-kamala-harris-went-for-policies-not-electoral-votes

August 6 2024 The Wagnerian Ring of Fear, Power, and Force, and What Plato Got Wrong About Rule By Elites: the Case of Hiroshima

     Today is the anniversary of possibly the most terrible war crime ever perpetrated in the history of man’s inhumanity to man and a bitter monument to the collapse of values under the pressure of fear; Hiroshima.

     Though the litany of such atrocities would roll on endlessly like a song of despair and horror, there is nothing like America’s use of a weapon which cast men’s souls from their bodies and left their shadows etched upon the walls.

     As with all Defining Moments of humankind which have become negotiated truths and a ground of struggle for ownership of the stories of ourselves, memory, history, and identity as a prochronism or history expressed in our form of how we have adapted to change over vast epochs of time, there are really two stories here, which swallow each other like the Ouroboros of Time; the story of events themselves as lived and the Rashomon Gate of stories about these Defining Moments as witnesses of history and what Foucault called truthtelling or the sacred calling to pursue the truth. Stories, and the stories about the stories; and which has ahold of us at any given moment we cannot know.

     Hiroshima is such a Defining Moment and Rashomon Gate event, in which humankind is forever changed by our new capacity to annihilate ourselves. As Oppenheimer described it, quoting the Bhagavad-Gita; “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.”

     How will we use such dread power, and how will the mere fact of its existence shape us and our future possibilities of becoming human?

     Is this the greatest war crime in history, and the measure of America as the furthest depths of human evil? There are many candidates for that title, however, as humans are cruel and our governments are monuments of force and control. Historically I would say the Mongol origination of biowarfare in catapulting the bodies of plague victims over the walls of the cities they wanted to conquer was also very wicked, and resulted in the population of Europe losing one in every four persons, possibly one in three, during the three hundred year terror of the Black Death. But if Hiroshima is the most terrible of crimes against humanity, it is because it is ours.

     The evils of which we are beneficiaries are always the most terrible, if only to us. Sadly, such evils are manifold and numberless; the Conquest and genocide of indigenous peoples of the Americas, slavery, Patriarchy, imperialism, and the culture of violence, militarism, toxic masculinity, and the fetishization of guns which sustains them.

    And we have neither renounced nor abandoned the use of such weapons. Indeed, we are making more, and more terrible. In this the true meaning of America to the rest of the world is undeniable and clear; we are a nation whose objective is imperial conquest and whose mission is the annihilation of the human soul.

    We can change this path we are on toward destruction and the subjugation of others simply and at any time; abandon the use of social force. A good beginning might be mothballing our nuclear arsenal and all weapons of mass destruction and terror, and disarming the police and other forces of tyranny, repression, and control.

     Which brings us to my theme today; unequal power is also violence. For the key to our bewildering transformation from an egalitarian democracy wherein universal rights and the autonomy of individuals is paramount to an authoritarian tyranny of force and control is that militarism and the fetishization of instruments of violence is enormously profitable and necessary to imperialism and a global hegemony of power and privilege. This requires an elite, which both profits from and creates the conditions of inequality in a recursive process.

     The fragmentation and class stratification of our free society of equals by hierarchies of exclusionary otherness into a vast precariat inclusive of prison labor as a national policy of the re-enslavement of Black people and theft of citizenship, and an elite hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege constructed on white supremacy and Gideonite patriarchy, is no flaw but a central and inherent design of our society, whereby authority centralizes power unto itself as a tyrannical subversion of Liberty.

     The horrific spectacles of open violations of our values and ideals, the perversions and aberrant performances of atavistic barbarism, and the arrogance of impunity of power of the years of the Fourth Reich’s capture of America and the regime of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, are direct consequences of this process of undemocratization, which began with the demonstration of federal power in the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794, in the global interventions of Manifest Destiny and the paramount dominion of our empire won by our victories in the World Wars, the disastrous co-optation of the Nazi elite in service to the projects of anticommunist imperialism and their capture of the Republican Party in 1980 in alliance with Gideonite fundamentalists, white supremacists, and plutocrats, and the failed attempt to shake off the host political system of the January 6 Insurrection.

     As proofs of this theory I offer here two examples; the emergence of a technocratic elite in the creation of a nuclear arsenal and of a medical elite whose purpose is to ensure the dominance of its own class and of social order, and which acts as an arbiter of what is real and what is mad, in the creation of a carceral regime of torture and thought control at Guantanamo and in secret prisons as a test laboratory for America and the world, in part a result of the inevitable imperial phase of America after 911 but which originates with the torturers whose escape from justice we abetted after the Second World War.

    In one of the founding documents of our civilization, The Republic, Plato argues that the achievement of virtue is only possible when society is mediated by an elite, philosopher-kings who are beholden to no one and independent of financial interest or influence, experts who may govern by reason. It’s an attractive idea, and one with a long reach; America charged Aaron Burr with treason over corruption, nepotism and bribery, results of an idea of the role of gentlemen in government embedded in the traditions of the British aristocracy.

    As Gramsci famously said, “Between force and consent lies corruption”. At the heart of this ancient debate about equality and the nature of the Good lies a simple and easily demonstrable truth; the rule of elites is always against the interests of its subjects, as it concentrates power rather than distributing agency among its citizens as co-owners of their government.

     If you wish to see what lies on the opposite side of democracy, just look at Hiroshima and Guantanamo, Wounded Knee and the 1921 Tulsa Massacre, or beyond America’s sphere of dominion and responsibility at political atrocities like the Holocaust, Gaza, the Siege of Mariupol, Srebrenica, Xinjiang, or at any of the authoritarian regimes throughout the world today which sadly control most of humankind and scheme endlessly to conquer and enslave the rest; Putin’s Russia, Xi Jinping’s China, Modi’s India, and far too many others.

     Or to the collapse of the utopia Plato attempted to found by reimagination of the Empire of Syracuse, first by reconstructing the tyrant Dionysius the Second as a Philosopher-King and then by revolutionary seizure of power through his uncle Dion, both his students. This was the first Republic, whose failures and collapse Plato interrogates and fictionalizes in The Republic, the ur-source and founding document of democracy, wherein the sharing and use of social power is envisioned as a ground of struggle between liberty and tyranny.

    Why is this important to us now, this origin story of our civilization as a free society of equals born in the Forum of Athens?

      Because we today are witnesses to a parallel civilizational collapse from the mechanical failures of our systems’ internal contradictions and the legacies of our histories, caught in the gears of the great machine we serve like Charlie Chaplin in The Factory.

     Ours is a machine which runs on the recursive processes of fear, power, and force, forever defined by Hiroshima as its terminal limit. The psychopathy of power and the nihilism of force may be shadows which devour our ideals of the good as freedom, equality, truth, and justice as their originals, our forms and realities from which they are cast, but they are also the products of political decisions and historical processes and not natural and inherent conditions of our humanity. Nor is civilizational collapse an inevitable consequence of democracy.

     There are two obvious escapes from this dilemma; the redemptive power of love triumphs over fear and hate as motive forces and systemic harms, and seizures of unequal power restore balance in reply to structural harms. Plato tried them both, and both times failed; but he never tried both together as interdependent and parallel processes of change, as I propose herein.

     In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

Hiroshima: Out of the Ashes full film

Hiroshima Mon Amour film

Dr. Strangelove trailer

Oppenheimer trailer

The Victims of Hiroshima & Nagasaki

Hiroshima marks 78th anniversary of atomic bombing – The Japan Times

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/08/06/japan/hiroshima-attomic-bombing-78th-anniversary/

Chaplin’s The Great Dictator

https://www.charliechaplin.com/en/articles/29-The-Final-Speech-from-The-Great-Dictator-

               Plato’s Republic, a reading list

Glaucon’s Fate: History, Myth, and Character in Plato’s Republic,

by Jacob Howland

Plato’s Republic, by Alain Badiou

The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists, by Iris Murdoch

The Sovereignty of Good, by Iris Murdoch

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11232.The_Sovereignty_of_Good

The Open Society and Its Enemies – Volume One: The Spell of Plato, by Karl Popper

1

Plato’s Critique of Impure Reason: On Goodness and Truth in the Republic,

by D.C. Schindler

The Music of the Republic: Essays on Socrates’ Conversations and Plato’s Writings, by Eva Brann

Socrates’ Second Sailing: On Plato’s Republic, by Seth Benardete

Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic, by C.D.C. Reeve

The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle, by Ernest Barker

       Hiroshima, a reading list

Black Rain, by Masuji Ibuse

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/289991.Black_Rain

Hiroshima, by John Hersey

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27323.Hiroshima

Hiroshima Nagasaki: The Real Story of the Atomic Bombings and Their Aftermath, by Paul Ham

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18404128-hiroshima-nagasaki

Hiroshima in America, by Robert Jay Lifton, Greg Mitchell

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/116215.Hiroshima_in_America

A World Destroyed: Hiroshima and Its Legacies, by Martin J. Sherwin, Robert Jay Lifton (Foreword by)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/116224.A_World_Destroyed

140 Days to Hiroshima: The Story of Japan’s Last Chance to Avert Armageddon,

by David Dean Barrett

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51089656-140-days-to-hiroshima

Before the Fallout: From Marie Curie to Hiroshima, by Diana Preston

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1045979.Before_the_Fallout

Hiroshima Traces: Time, Space, and the Dialectics of Memory, by Lisa Yoneyama

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/601099.Hiroshima_Traces

Black and Blue: The Bruising Passion of Camera Lucida, La Jetee, Sans soleil, and Hiroshima mon amour by Carol Mavor

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13586053-black-and-blue

Hiroshima, Mon Amour And Last Year At Marienbad: Two Screenplays by Marguerite Duras

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/316018.Hiroshima_Mon_Amour_And_Last_Year_At_Marienbad

August 5 2024 Fascism’s Theatre of Cruelty and Fear: Anniversary of Kashmir Under Indian Occupation and Martial Law

     Kashmir, where once I sailed upon the Lake of Dreams, defended a shrine of mercy against a riotous horde with a saint, his idiot servant, and an escaped criminal who had claimed sanctuary, was wooed by Beauty but instead was claimed by Vision.

     It is ever thus; immanence and transcendence, beauty and ugliness, truth and lies, rapture and terror, playing games of chance for the kingdom of the human heart, and none of us can with certainly tell which is which.

     August the fifth marks the anniversary of India’s Conquest of Kashmir, its occupation and imposition of martial law, of the theft of freedom of religion, of genocidal ethnic cleansing and sectarian violence, a conquest which has been instrumental to India’s Hindu Nationalist regime in the subversion of democracy in India and the belligerent imperialist provocation of Pakistan and China the purpose of which is the transformation of India from a diverse and inclusive  society of thousands of autonomous cultural communities into a militarized and deracinated polity of assimilated Hindu theocratic unity by fascisms of blood, faith, and soil. 

     And fascist tyrannies require one thing above all else; a threat which defines the boundaries of the Other. Where Hitler had Jews, Modi has Muslims.

Categories of exclusionary otherness are necessary if you need followers to submit to your authority; this is why we must beware of those who claim to speak for us. Its why America has refugees, mainly Catholics of indigenous nonwhite ancestry, in concentration camps along our border with Mexico; our border defines us as a white supremacist ethnostate and implicit theocracy of ultra Protestant nationalism as shaped and imprinted by the venal Pat Robertson who instigated the Mayan Genocide, a theocratic fig leaf of legitimacy for conservatism which captured the Republican Party in 1980 under the shadow state of Jerry Falwell consisting mainly of networks of Pentecostal charismatics and fundamentalists and the churches through which they are radicalized and mobilized in the subversion of democracy, a model of subversion of democracy copied by the Taliban in Afghanistan, twin to our own Republican Party. Precisely the same strategy of the weaponization of faith in service to power as used by both Hindu elites in India and Islamic fundamentalists throughout the world.

      In God We Trust, as our American currency proclaims, which asks us not to believe in the Infinite but to submit to the state as an intermediary and representative, and such identitarian politics always means our interpretations and organizations of faith as an Elect, born of specific histories, which anoint kings and authorize tyrannies and carceral states of force and control.

      I fought during a previous Indian Conquest during 1990 through 1993, a liberation struggle and Resistance which we won only because of the Solidarity of Kashmiri Hindus and Muslims versus foreign destabilization and invasion, the magnificent allyship of Pakistan, and the political disunity of India. The capture of the Indian state by the RSS under Modi changed the balance of forces.

     On this day a wall of silence fell over what was once a sovereign and independent nation, in which both Hindus and Muslims were free to follow the traditions of their communities without compulsion by the state in matters of faith, a silence of tyranny in which cell phone and internet communications went dark in violation of our universal human rights of information access and sharing so that no resistance could be organized and no calls for help to the world could be made. Tyrants must first steal our voices and means of connection with others; an assault on independent journalism as a sacred calling in pursuit of truth and on Truth itself through the lies and deceptions of a propaganda mill follow quickly on.

     Ten thousand people were arrested on that day, including anyone who might form a government of resistance against Modi’s fascist state of India; others joined the eight to ten thousand Disappeared by the death squads which operate as deniable assets of the forces of occupation, much as Trump’s white supremacist terrorists disrupted protests here in America with violence, arson, looting, and vandalism acting in coordination with the Homeland Security special occupying force of secret police whose mission was to repress dissent and subvert democracy. This is the second act of tyranny’s Theatre of Cruelty and Fear; to subjugate through brutality and learned helplessness.

     How does India, sister nation to America in anticolonial revolution against the British Empire and both founded on secular democracy, come to this?

     I described the processes of unequal power whereby revolutions become tyrannies in my post of January 30 2020, India Begins to Throw Off the Chains of Hindu Nationalism: a wave of mass protests over the new citizenship law and a challenge in the Supreme Court by the state of Kerala; At issue are two key questions of a democratic society; the franchise, who gets to vote, and citizenship, who gets to be Indian. The problem with Modi’s Hindu Nationalist government is that valorizing Hinduism as a unifying principle in the long struggle against British colonialism and imperialist rule has resulted not only in leveraging independence, but also in othering non-Hindu peoples to whom the Nationalists would now deny citizenship with all its legal protections.

     In a single stroke of the pen Modi would transform a pluralistic and inclusive model democracy into a fascist state of blood, faith, and soil. With himself as its tyrant.

      India is a nation of staggering complexity and diversity, in which all things are layered with historical meanings and resonances which extend throughout ten thousand years of continuous civilization, three times older than Babylon as dated from landforms described in the Vedas, among humankind’s oldest known written records. India contains 67 cultures, and among its 850 languages and dialects 14 are official languages. Until Independence, it was a checkerboard of 562 sovereign states, each with its own laws, armies, postal systems, aristocracies; and was further divided by the persistent though now illegal caste system into around three thousand layers of social stratification, each with its own cultural traditions and rules governing social functions.

     To this list one must add divisions of faith, though Hinduism, an 80% majority, is broadly inclusive and contains two different sets of deities and mythologies from the original Dravidians and the later Aryan migration, from which Jainism and Buddhism are branches, the Vajrayana Buddhism which I studied in Nepal as a monk of the Kagyu Order especially being a hybrid of Tibetan Buddhism and North Indian Shaivite and Tantric Hinduism, twin influences from Hinduism which I had previously studied with a priestess of Kali and among the Aghora warrior brotherhood which uniquely recognizes no differences of caste, and the Sikhs are a reconciliation faith of Hinduism and Islam. Of the Abrahamic faiths, Muslims number over 14% of Indians, persisting even after the horrors of Partition, and over 2% are Christians; St Thomas landed in AD 52 on the Malabar coast and founded seven churches in Kerala, which adopted the Syrian Liturgy of Antioch in the fourth century, and the Jesuit missionary Saint Francis Xavier arrived in Goa in 1542.

     Kashmir itself is 98% Islamic, and a major center and homeland of its mystical form Sufism, which I studied as a scholar of the Naqshbandi Order in Srinagar, and in Kashmir and North India generally mystical Islam and its Sufi orders have assimilated elements and disciplines of both Hinduism and Buddhism, parallel with Buddhist-Hindu syncretic hybridization in North India. This movement toward an Islamic Hindu-Buddhism as a unitary faith, ongoing for centuries, is the reason the Taliban and other fundamentalists have attacked and burned Sufi shrines and madrassas throughout the region, a campaign which includes the 2007 Siege of Lal Masjid in Pakistan.  

     For centuries, Hindu and Islamic communities had coexisted peacefully in Kashmir, to the point of blending faiths, until intrusive forces from outside weaponized faith in service to power as identitarian politics, and broke it all asunder.

     How does one unite such a nation as India in resistance to a brutal and treacherous occupation like that of the British Empire, masters of the art of divide and conquer who pitted Hindus and Muslims against each other and the native monarchies against the underclasses? Appeals to nationalism and to identity are powerful tools in the struggle for liberation; the problem with such postcolonial successor states is that they inherit the identitarian, militaristic, and authoritarian structures and characteristics of their revolutionary period as tyrannies of force and control.

     As I wrote in my post of March 10 2020, Kashmir: Under the Shadow of India’s Empire of Fear; Mass arrests and disappearances, a total internet blackout and de facto siege lifted on March 5 after seven months, the literal blinding of witnesses to the brutality of the occupation forces, the infamous torture centers and graveyards of the martyrs; India’s imperial conquest of Kashmir has become an ethnic cleansing and possibly a genocide.

      The siege cost the economy of Kashmir two and a half billion dollars, but also concealed a crime against humanity from the eyes of the world; India’s genocide of religious and ethnic minorities and the savage repression of dissent. This was the true objective of Modi and the Hindu Nationalists in dissolving the independence of Kashmir; the mass imprisonment of the political leaders of the former government decapitated its organized resistance, and the campaign of ethnic cleansing signaled the devouring of Kashmir by India’s fascist tyranny of state terror. Here I use the term Devouring; a translation of the Romani word for the Nazi annihilation of the gypsies.

    The former princely state of Islamic Kashmir and Hindu Jammu has been divided by civil war and a direct war of dominion between Pakistan and India since 1947; I was living in Srinagar when the Kashmir Valley exploded in ethnic conflict, revolution, and war in 1990. Rioting mobs of Hindu Nationalists organized and reinforced by Indian special operations units, forged by the British Raj as their most terrible weapon of imperial conquest, began the usual campaign of burning villages and mosques, mass rapes, random murders, and the kidnapping, torture, and assassination of leaders and activists and really anyone else; Pakistan sent protection and mercy missions and special operations units of the army and Inter-Services Intelligence agency, developed in partnership with America during the 1980’s war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, and with years of experience supporting the mujahideen with whom they continue to operate today.

    The story as told by India’s Hindu Nationalists reverses this chronology of events and focuses on the ethnic cleansing of the Hindu Pandits by jihadist deniable assets of Pakistan, indisputably a crime against humanity and a case of the state as embodied violence. For myself, what is most important is not who threw the first stone, but that the violation and degeneration of our humanity and shared values as civilization was a consequence not of intrinsic historical trauma or epigenetic harms but of a conflict of imperial dominion which made a wishbone of Kashmir.  

     With hundreds of thousands of people in the streets demonstrating for independence, random violence and mob rule, and open battle between some of the finest black ops units ever fielded, Kashmir devolved into chaos and ruin. Only the fact that India was not unified politically accounts for the failure of the conquest after three years of madness and horror; that disunity of purpose in India ended with the election of Modi.

     And this is where we may leverage change, for India’s Hindu Nationalist regime of tyranny and terror is neither covert nor an amorphous thing of generalized racism and religious intolerance, but a Theatre of Cruelty and Fear performed by a government on the stage of the world.

     I call for the Boycott, Divestiture, and Sanction of India until it abandons Kashmir and recognizes her sovereignty and independence.  

    As I wrote in my post of March 6 2020; India under the Hindu Nationalists has become a nation of the lathi, a meter long club used by the forces of repression to drive otherness from their exclusive communities. It is an ancient nightmare and among the most terrible; to make everyone the same.

     For myself it has a special meaning, this sameness; among my earliest memories is a burning cross our neighbors had set on fire on the front lawn of a newlywed couple, previously friends and relatives of many among the torch-bearing crowd in a town of around two thousand, in a carnivalesque ritual of Othering. A Dutch man of the Reformed Church aligned with the Apartheid regime of South Africa, grim giants with white hair like Harry Potter villains or Star Trek’s Seven of Nine, who believed music was sinful, spoke in King James Bible English full of thees and thous as a second language to Dutch, secretive and remote, and to whom buttons on their somber black clothes were forbidden as non-Biblical technology, had married a woman of our local minority community, the laughing and earthy, polka dancing, sawdust pit wrestling Swiss Calvinist Church, who spoke standard American English with vestiges of Swiss German, and would serve beer to anyone over the age of twelve at the Swiss Hall, where fancy dress was lederhosen though normally they dressed and acted like any other Americans and more importantly would interact with anyone beyond their own group regardless of church membership. To this transgression of boundaries between Protestant church communities which had both originated in Calvinism, and both speaking Germannic languages, our town replied by calling it a mixed marriage and burning a cross on their lawn.

     My mother and I had come out to see what was on fire and discovered the scene of this hate crime, rounding a corner and suddenly among hundreds of our neighbors running amok.

    A boy I knew from school ran past carrying a torch, grinning and yelling; “We’re casting out the evildoers!”

     So I asked my mother, “Who are the evildoers?”

      Looking very ferocious, she replied; “The people with torches are the evildoers. They are the enemy, and they are always our enemies, yours and mine, no matter who they have come for.”

    “Why are they evil?”

     “Because they want to make everyone the same.”

     And this we must resist to the last, for there are no other choices. Those not of the elect will be pursued unto destruction by the forces of assimilation; only the manner of their deaths is in question, in submission or resistance.

     Unless we all stand together, united in an unbreakable human chain whose power surpasses that of any one of us or of any nation, vast and unstoppable as the tides.

     As written by the magnificent Arundati Roy in 2008 in The Guardian, in an article entitled Land and Freedom: Kashmir is in crisis: the region’s Muslims are mounting huge non-violent protests against the Indian government’s rule. But, asks Arundhati Roy, what would independence for the territory mean for its people?; “For the past 60 days or so, since about the end of June, the people of Kashmir have been free. Free in the most profound sense. They have shrugged off the terror of living their lives in the gun-sights of half a million heavily armed soldiers, in the most densely militarised zone in the world.

     After 18 years of administering a military occupation, the Indian government’s worst nightmare has come true. Having declared that the militant movement has been crushed, it is now faced with a non-violent mass protest, but not the kind it knows how to manage. This one is nourished by people’s memory of years of repression in which tens of thousands have been killed, thousands have been “disappeared”, hundreds of thousands tortured, injured, and humiliated. That kind of rage, once it finds utterance, cannot easily be tamed, rebottled and sent back to where it came from.

     A sudden twist of fate, an ill-conceived move over the transfer of 100 acres of state forest land to the Amarnath Shrine Board (which manages the annual Hindu pilgrimage to a cave deep in the Kashmir Himalayas) suddenly became the equivalent of tossing a lit match into a barrel of petrol. Until 1989 the Amarnath pilgrimage used to attract about 20,000 people who travelled to the Amarnath cave over a period of about two weeks. In 1990, when the overtly Islamist militant uprising in the valley coincided with the spread of virulent Hindu nationalism (Hindutva) in the Indian plains, the number of pilgrims began to increase exponentially. By 2008 more than 500,000 pilgrims visited the     

     Amarnath cave, in large groups, their passage often sponsored by Indian business houses. To many people in the valley this dramatic increase in numbers was seen as an aggressive political statement by an increasingly Hindu-fundamentalist Indian state. Rightly or wrongly, the land transfer was viewed as the thin edge of the wedge. It triggered an apprehension that it was the beginning of an elaborate plan to build Israeli-style settlements, and change the demography of the valley.

     Days of massive protest forced the valley to shut down completely. Within hours the protests spread from the cities to villages. Young stone pelters took to the streets and faced armed police who fired straight at them, killing several. For people as well as the government, it resurrected memories of the uprising in the early 90s. Throughout the weeks of protest, hartal (strikes) and police firing, while the Hindutva publicity machine charged Kashmiris with committing every kind of communal excess, the 500,000 Amarnath pilgrims completed their pilgrimage, not just unhurt, but touched by the hospitality they had been shown by local people.

     Eventually, taken completely by surprise at the ferocity of the response, the government revoked the land transfer. But by then the land-transfer had become what Syed Ali Shah Geelani, the most senior and also the most overtly Islamist separatist leader, called a “non-issue”.

     Massive protests against the revocation erupted in Jammu. There, too, the issue snowballed into something much bigger. Hindus began to raise issues of neglect and discrimination by the Indian state. (For some odd reason they blamed Kashmiris for that neglect.) The protests led to the blockading of the Jammu-Srinagar highway, the only functional road-link between Kashmir and India. Truckloads of perishable fresh fruit and valley produce began to rot.

     The blockade demonstrated in no uncertain terms to people in Kashmir that they lived on sufferance, and that if they didn’t behave themselves they could be put under siege, starved, deprived of essential commodities and medical supplies.

     To expect matters to end there was of course absurd. Hadn’t anybody noticed that in Kashmir even minor protests about civic issues like water and electricity inevitably turned into demands for azadi, freedom? To threaten them with mass starvation amounted to committing political suicide.

     Not surprisingly, the voice that the government of India has tried so hard to silence in Kashmir has massed into a deafening roar. Raised in a playground of army camps, checkpoints, and bunkers, with screams from torture chambers for a soundtrack, the young generation has suddenly discovered the power of mass protest, and above all, the dignity of being able to straighten their shoulders and speak for themselves, represent themselves. For them it is nothing short of an epiphany. Not even the fear of death seems to hold them back. And once that fear has gone, of what use is the largest or second largest army in the world?

     There have been mass rallies in the past, but none in recent memory that have been so sustained and widespread. The mainstream political parties of Kashmir – National Conference and People’s Democratic party – appear dutifully for debates in New Delhi’s TV studios, but can’t muster the courage to appear on the streets of Kashmir. The armed militants who, through the worst years of repression were seen as the only ones carrying the torch of azadi forward, if they are around at all, seem content to take a back seat and let people do the fighting for a change.

     The separatist leaders who do appear and speak at the rallies are not leaders so much as followers, being guided by the phenomenal spontaneous energy of a caged, enraged people that has exploded on Kashmir’s streets. Day after day, hundreds of thousands of people swarm around places that hold terrible memories for them. They demolish bunkers, break through cordons of concertina wire and stare straight down the barrels of soldiers’ machine guns, saying what very few in India want to hear. Hum Kya Chahtey? Azadi! (We want freedom.) And, it has to be said, in equal numbers and with equal intensity: Jeevey jeevey Pakistan. (Long live Pakistan.)

     That sound reverberates through the valley like the drumbeat of steady rain on a tin roof, like the roll of thunder during an electric storm.

     On August 15, India’s independence day, Lal Chowk, the nerve centre of Srinagar, was taken over by thousands of people who hoisted the Pakistani flag and wished each other “happy belated independence day” (Pakistan celebrates independence on August 14) and “happy slavery day”. Humour obviously, has survived India’s many torture centres and Abu Ghraibs in Kashmir.

     On August 16 more than 300,000 people marched to Pampore, to the village of the Hurriyat leader, Sheikh Abdul Aziz, who was shot down in cold blood five days earlier.

     On the night of August 17 the police sealed the city. Streets were barricaded, thousands of armed police manned the barriers. The roads leading into Srinagar were blocked. On the morning of August 18, people began pouring into Srinagar from villages and towns across the valley. In trucks, tempos, jeeps, buses and on foot. Once again, barriers were broken and people reclaimed their city. The police were faced with a choice of either stepping aside or executing a massacre. They stepped aside. Not a single bullet was fired.

     The city floated on a sea of smiles. There was ecstasy in the air. Everyone had a banner; houseboat owners, traders, students, lawyers, doctors. One said: “We are all prisoners, set us free.” Another said: “Democracy without freedom is demon-crazy.” Demon-crazy. That was a good one. Perhaps he was referring to the insanity that permits the world’s largest democracy to administer the world’s largest military occupation and continue to call itself a democracy.

     There was a green flag on every lamp post, every roof, every bus stop and on the top of chinar trees. A big one fluttered outside the All India Radio building. Road signs were painted over. Rawalpindi they said. Or simply Pakistan. It would be a mistake to assume that the public expression of affection for Pakistan automatically translates into a desire to accede to Pakistan. Some of it has to do with gratitude for the support – cynical or otherwise – for what Kashmiris see as their freedom struggle, and the Indian state sees as a terrorist campaign. It also has to do with mischief. With saying and doing what galls India most of all. (It’s easy to scoff at the idea of a “freedom struggle” that wishes to distance itself from a country that is supposed to be a democracy and align itself with another that has, for the most part been ruled by military dictators. A country whose army has committed genocide in what is now Bangladesh. A country that is even now being torn apart by its own ethnic war. These are important questions, but right now perhaps it’s more useful to wonder what this so-called democracy did in Kashmir to make people hate it so?)

     Everywhere there were Pakistani flags, everywhere the cry Pakistan se rishta kya? La illaha illallah. (What is our bond with Pakistan? There is no god but Allah.) Azadi ka matlab kya? La illaha illallah. (What does freedom mean? There is no god but Allah.)

     For somebody like myself, who is not Muslim, that interpretation of freedom is hard – if not impossible – to understand. I asked a young woman whether freedom for Kashmir would not mean less freedom for her, as a woman. She shrugged and said “What kind of freedom do we have now? The freedom to be raped by Indian soldiers?” Her reply silenced me.

    Surrounded by a sea of green flags, it was impossible to doubt or ignore the deeply Islamic fervour of the uprising taking place around me. It was equally impossible to label it a vicious, terrorist jihad. For Kashmiris it was a catharsis. A historical moment in a long and complicated struggle for freedom with all the imperfections, cruelties and confusions that freedom struggles have. This one cannot by any means call itself pristine, and will always be stigmatised by, and will some day, I hope, have to account for, among other things, the brutal killings of Kashmiri Pandits in the early years of the uprising, culminating in the exodus of almost the entire Hindu community from the Kashmir valley.

     As the crowd continued to swell I listened carefully to the slogans, because rhetoric often holds the key to all kinds of understanding. There were plenty of insults and humiliation for India: Ay jabiron ay zalimon, Kashmir hamara chhod do (Oh oppressors, Oh wicked ones, Get out of our Kashmir.) The slogan that cut through me like a knife and clean broke my heart was this one: Nanga bhookha Hindustan, jaan se pyaara Pakistan. (Naked, starving India, More precious than life itself – Pakistan.)

     Why was it so galling, so painful to listen to this? I tried to work it out and settled on three reasons. First, because we all know that the first part of the slogan is the embarrassing and unadorned truth about India, the emerging superpower. Second, because all Indians who are not nanga or bhooka are and have been complicit in complex and historical ways with the elaborate cultural and economic systems that make Indian society so cruel, so vulgarly unequal. And third, because it was painful to listen to people who have suffered so much themselves mock others who suffer, in different ways, but no less intensely, under the same oppressor. In that slogan I saw the seeds of how easily victims can become perpetrators.

     Syed Ali Shah Geelani began his address with a recitation from the Qur’an. He then said what he has said before, on hundreds of occasions. The only way for the struggle to succeed, he said, was to turn to the Qur’an for guidance. He said Islam would guide the struggle and that it was a complete social and moral code that would govern the people of a free Kashmir. He said Pakistan had been created as the home of Islam, and that that goal should never be subverted. He said just as Pakistan belonged to Kashmir, Kashmir belonged to Pakistan. He said minority communities would have full rights and their places of worship would be safe. Each point he made was applauded.

     I imagined myself standing in the heart of a Hindu nationalist rally being addressed by the Bharatiya Janata party’s (BJP) LK Advani. Replace the word Islam with the word Hindutva, replace the word Pakistan with Hindustan, replace the green flags with saffron ones and we would have the BJP’s nightmare vision of an ideal India.

     Is that what we should accept as our future? Monolithic religious states handing down a complete social and moral code, “a complete way of life”? Millions of us in India reject the Hindutva project. Our rejection springs from love, from passion, from a kind of idealism, from having enormous emotional stakes in the society in which we live. What our neighbours do, how they choose to handle their affairs does not affect our argument, it only strengthens it.

     Arguments that spring from love are also fraught with danger. It is for the people of Kashmir to agree or disagree with the Islamist project (which is as contested, in equally complex ways, all over the world by Muslims, as Hindutva is contested by Hindus). Perhaps now that the threat of violence has receded and there is some space in which to debate views and air ideas, it is time for those who are part of the struggle to outline a vision for what kind of society they are fighting for. Perhaps it is time to offer people something more than martyrs, slogans and vague generalisations. Those who wish to turn to the Qur’an for guidance will no doubt find guidance there. But what of those who do not wish to do that, or for whom the Qur’an does not make place? Do the Hindus of Jammu and other minorities also have the right to self-determination? Will the hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits living in exile, many of them in terrible poverty, have the right to return? Will they be paid reparations for the terrible losses they have suffered? Or will a free Kashmir do to its minorities what India has done to Kashmiris for 61 years? What will happen to homosexuals and adulterers and blasphemers? What of thieves and lafangas and writers who do not agree with the “complete social and moral code”? Will we be put to death as we are in Saudi Arabia? Will the cycle of death, repression and bloodshed continue? History offers many models for Kashmir’s thinkers and intellectuals and politicians to study. What will the Kashmir of their dreams look like? Algeria? Iran? South Africa? Switzerland? Pakistan?

     At a crucial time like this, few things are more important than dreams. A lazy utopia and a flawed sense of justice will have consequences that do not bear thinking about. This is not the time for intellectual sloth or a reluctance to assess a situation clearly and honestly.

     Already the spectre of partition has reared its head. Hindutva networks are alive with rumours about Hindus in the valley being attacked and forced to flee. In response, phone calls from Jammu reported that an armed Hindu militia was threatening a massacre and that Muslims from the two Hindu majority districts were preparing to flee. Memories of the bloodbath that ensued and claimed the lives of more than a million people when India and Pakistan were partitioned have come flooding back. That nightmare will haunt all of us forever.

     However, none of these fears of what the future holds can justify the continued military occupation of a nation and a people. No more than the old colonial argument about how the natives were not ready for freedom justified the colonial project.

     Of course there are many ways for the Indian state to continue to hold on to Kashmir. It could do what it does best. Wait. And hope the people’s energy will dissipate in the absence of a concrete plan. It could try and fracture the fragile coalition that is emerging. It could extinguish this non-violent uprising and re-invite armed militancy. It could increase the number of troops from half a million to a whole million. A few strategic massacres, a couple of targeted assassinations, some disappearances and a massive round of arrests should do the trick for a few more years.

     The unimaginable sums of public money that are needed to keep the military occupation of Kashmir going is money that ought by right to be spent on schools and hospitals and food for an impoverished, malnutritioned population in India. What kind of government can possibly believe that it has the right to spend it on more weapons, more concertina wire and more prisons in Kashmir?

     The Indian military occupation of Kashmir makes monsters of us all. It allows Hindu chauvinists to target and victimise Muslims in India by holding them hostage to the freedom struggle being waged by Muslims in Kashmir.

     India needs azadi from Kashmir just as much as – if not more than – Kashmir needs azadi from India.”

Land and freedom, Arundhati Roy

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/22/kashmir.india

               Kashmir, a reading list

Kashmir: Glimpses of History and the Story of Struggle, by Saifuddin Soz

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40614895-kashmir

Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir, by Mridu Rai

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/410942.Hindu_Rulers_Muslim_Subjects

The Collaborator, by Mirza Waheed

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9555685-the-collaborator

The Lamentations of a Sombre Sky, by Manan Kapoor

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27416210-the-lamentations-of-a-sombre-sky

I, Lalla: The Poems of Lal Dĕd, by Lalla, Ranjit Hoskote (Translator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13542603-i-lalla

The Country Without a Post Office, by Agha Shahid Ali

Call Me Ishmael Tonight: A Book of Ghazals, by Agha Shahid Ali

Ravishing DisUnities: Real Ghazals in English, by Agha Shahid Ali (Editor), Sarah Suleri Goodyear

A Map of Longings: Life and Works of Agha Shahid Ali, by Manan Kapoor

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58319086-a-map-of-longings

References

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/Swaminomics/a-tale-of-two-ethnic-cleansings-in-kashmir/

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/05/modi-brutal-treatment-of-kashmir-exposes-his-tactics-and-their-flaws

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/06/modi-india-muslims-times-square-hindu-temple

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/05/devastating-siege-kashmir-colony-india-crushing-dissent

                                            Sufism, a reading list

 (these are my choices of best translations as a point of entry to a glorious and beautiful world; its marvelous to read into the subject in the original languages as I have, Classical Quranic Arabic, Classical Persian, and Ottoman Turkish, but a project beyond that of casual interest)

The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary, by Seyyed Hossein Nasr (Editor-in-Chief)

     Like Rifles to a Marine, there are many Qurans, but this one is mine

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15820216-the-study-quran

The Garden of Truth: The Vision and Promise of Sufism, Islam’s Mystical Tradition, by Seyyed Hossein Nasr

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/142133.The_Garden_of_Truth

The Essential Rumi – New Expanded Edition 2020: Translations By Coleman Barks with John Moyne, by Jalal Al-Din Rumi, Coleman Barks (Translator), John Moyne (Translator), A.J. Arberry (Translator), Reynold Alleyne Nicholson (Translator)

The Big Red Book, by Rumi, Coleman Barks (Translator)

The Way of Passion: A Celebration of Rumi, by Andrew Harvey

The Triumphal Sun: A Study of the Works of Jalāloddin Rumi, by Annemarie Schimmel, Ehsan Yarshater (Editor)

Annotated Translation of the Bezels of Wisdom, by Binyamin Abrahamov

The Meccan Revelations, by Ibn Arabi

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/739695.The_Meccan_Revelations

The Meccan Revelations, Volume II, by Ibn Arabi, Michel Chodkiewicz

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/193635.The_Meccan_Revelations_Volume_II

The Book of Ibn al-Farid, by Ibn Al-Farid, Paul Smith (Translator)

Hallaj: Mystic and Martyr – Abridged Edition, by Louis Massignon, Herbert Mason (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/165115.Hallaj

The Hand of Poetry: Five Mystic Poets of Persia: Translations from the Poems of Sanai, Attar, Rumi, Saadi and Hafiz

by Coleman Barks (Translation), Sanai, Rumi, Saadi, Attar of Nishapur,

  Hazrat Inayat Khan (Commentaries by)

The Conference of the Birds, by Attar of Nishapur, Sholeh Wolpe (Translation)

The Illuminated Hafiz: Love Poems for the Journey to Light

by Hafez, Michael Green (Illustrator), Saliha Green (Illustrator), Nancy Barton (Editor), Omid Safi (Foreword), Coleman Barks (Translator), Robert Bly (Translator), Peter Booth (Translator), Meher Baba (Translator)

Suhrawardi: The Shape of Light, by Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi, Tosun Bayrak (Preface), Shaykh Muhammad Sadiq Naqshbandi Erzinjani (Afterword), Hadrat Abdul-Qadir al-Jilani (Foreword)

Sufism and the Perfect Human: From Ibn ‘Arabī To Al-Jīlī, by Fitzroy Morrissey, Ibn Battuta (Contributor), Abd Al-Karaim Ibn Jailai (Contributor)

Fakhruddin Iraqi: Divine Flashes, by Fakhruddin Iraqi, William C. Chittick (Translator), Peter Wilson (Goodreads Author) (Translator), Seyyed Hossein Nasr (Foreword)

Khidr in Sufi Poetry: A Selection, by Paul Smith

The Four Last Great Sufi Master Poets: Selected Poems, by Paul Smith (Translator), Shah Latif, Nazir Akbarabadi, Mirza Asadullah Khan Ghalib, Muhammad Iqbal

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/24468396-the-four-last-great-sufi-master-poets

Urdu

5 اگست 2024 فاشزم کا ظلم اور خوف کا تھیٹر: بھارتی قبضے اور مارشل لاء کے تحت کشمیر کی برسی

      کشمیر، جہاں ایک بار میں نے خوابوں کی جھیل پر کشتی رانی کی تھی، ایک سنت، اس کے بیوقوف خادم، اور ایک فرار ہونے والے مجرم کے ساتھ ایک فسادی گروہ کے خلاف رحمت کے مزار کا دفاع کیا تھا، جس نے پناہ گاہ کا دعویٰ کیا تھا، اسے خوبصورتی نے راغب کیا تھا لیکن اس کے بجائے ویژن نے دعویٰ کیا تھا۔

      یہ ہمیشہ اس طرح ہے؛ استحکام اور ماورائی، خوبصورتی اور بدصورتی، سچ اور جھوٹ، بے خودی اور دہشت، انسانی دل کی بادشاہی کے لیے موقع کا کھیل کھیلنا اور ہم میں سے کوئی بھی یقینی طور پر یہ نہیں بتا سکتا کہ کون سا ہے۔

      پانچ اگست کو کشمیر پر ہندوستان کی فتح، اس کے قبضے اور مارشل لاء کے نفاذ، مذہب کی آزادی کی چوری، نسل کشی کے نسلی تطہیر اور فرقہ وارانہ تشدد کی برسی منائی جاتی ہے، ایک ایسی فتح جو ہندوستان کی ہندو قوم پرست حکومت کی بغاوت میں اہم کردار ادا کرتی رہی ہے۔ بھارت میں جمہوریت اور پاکستان اور چین کی جنگجو سامراجی اشتعال انگیزی جس کا مقصد ہزاروں خود مختار ثقافتی برادریوں کے ایک متنوع اور جامع معاشرے سے بھارت کو خون، عقیدے کے فسطائیت کے ذریعے مل کر ہندو اتحاد کی عسکری اور گھٹیا سیاست میں تبدیل کرنا ہے۔ ، اور مٹی.

      اور فاشسٹ ظالموں کو سب سے بڑھ کر ایک چیز کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔ ایک خطرہ جو دوسرے کی حدود کو متعین کرتا ہے۔ جہاں ہٹلر کے پاس یہودی تھے، مودی کے پاس مسلمان ہیں۔

اگر آپ کو پیروکاروں کی ضرورت ہے کہ وہ آپ کے اختیار کے تابع ہوں؛ اس لیے ہمیں ان لوگوں سے ہوشیار رہنا چاہیے جو ہمارے لیے بات کرنے کا دعویٰ کرتے ہیں۔ یہی وجہ ہے کہ امریکہ میں میکسیکو کے ساتھ ہماری سرحد کے ساتھ حراستی کیمپوں میں پناہ گزین ہیں، خاص طور پر مقامی غیر سفید نسل کے کیتھولک؛ ہماری سرحد ہمیں سفید فام بالادستی کی نسل پرستانہ نسل کے طور پر اور الٹرا پروٹسٹنٹ قوم پرستی کی مضمر تھیوکریسی کے طور پر بیان کرتی ہے جس کی شکل اور نقوش وینل پیٹ رابرٹسن نے کی تھی جس نے مایا نسل کشی کو اکسایا تھا، جو قدامت پرستی کے لیے قانونی جواز کا ایک تھیوکریٹک انجیر کا پتی ہے جس نے 1980 میں ریپبلکن پارٹی کو بنیادی طور پر کنسرٹ کے نیٹ ورک پر قبضہ کر لیا تھا۔ پینٹی کوسٹل کرشمات اور بنیاد پرستوں اور گرجا گھروں کے جن کے ذریعے وہ بنیاد پرست ہیں اور جمہوریت کی بغاوت میں متحرک ہیں۔ اقتدار کی خدمت میں ایمان کے ہتھیار بنانے کی بالکل وہی حکمت عملی جو ہندوستان میں ہندو اشرافیہ اور پوری دنیا میں اسلامی بنیاد پرست دونوں استعمال کرتے ہیں۔ خدا پر ہم بھروسہ کرتے ہیں، جیسا کہ ہماری امریکی کرنسی اعلان کرتی ہے، جو ہم سے کہتی ہے کہ لامحدود پر یقین نہ کریں بلکہ ایک ثالث اور نمائندے کے طور پر ریاست کے سامنے سرتسلیم خم کریں، اور اس طرح کی شناختی سیاست کا مطلب ہمیشہ ہماری تشریحات اور عقیدے کی تنظیمیں ہیں جو کہ ایک منتخب کے طور پر پیدا ہوئے ہیں۔ مخصوص تاریخیں، جو بادشاہوں کو مسح کرتی ہیں اور ظالموں اور طاقت اور کنٹرول کی ریاستوں کو اختیار کرتی ہیں۔

      اس دن خاموشی کی دیوار گر گئی جو کبھی ایک خودمختار اور خودمختار قوم تھی، جس میں ہندو اور مسلمان دونوں اپنی برادریوں کی روایات پر عمل کرنے کے لیے آزاد تھے، عقیدے کے معاملے میں ریاست کی طرف سے جبر کے بغیر، ظلم کی خاموشی کس سیل میں تھی۔ معلومات تک رسائی اور اشتراک کے ہمارے عالمی انسانی حقوق کی خلاف ورزی کرتے ہوئے فون اور انٹرنیٹ مواصلات تاریک ہو گئے تاکہ کوئی مزاحمت منظم نہ ہو سکے اور دنیا کو مدد کے لیے کوئی کال نہ کی جا سکے۔ ظالموں کو سب سے پہلے ہماری آواز اور دوسروں کے ساتھ رابطے کے ذرائع کو چرانا چاہیے۔ ایک پروپیگنڈہ چکی کے جھوٹ اور فریب کے ذریعے سچائی کی تلاش میں ایک مقدس دعوت کے طور پر آزاد صحافت پر حملہ اور خود سچ پر حملہ تیزی سے جاری ہے۔

      اس دن دس ہزار لوگوں کو گرفتار کیا گیا، جن میں وہ لوگ بھی شامل تھے جو مودی کی فاشسٹ ریاست بھارت کے خلاف مزاحمت کی حکومت بنا سکتے تھے۔ دیگر آٹھ سے دس ہزار ڈیتھ اسکواڈز میں شامل ہوئے جو قابض افواج کے ناقابل تردید اثاثوں کے طور پر کام کرتے ہیں، جیسا کہ ٹرمپ کے سفید فام بالادست دہشت گردوں نے ہوم لینڈ سیکیورٹی کی خصوصی قابض فوج کے ساتھ مل کر تشدد اور توڑ پھوڑ کے ساتھ امریکہ میں مظاہروں میں خلل ڈالا۔ پولیس جس کا مشن اختلاف رائے کو دبانا اور جمہوریت کو تباہ کرنا تھا۔ یہ ظلم اور خوف کے تھیٹر کا دوسرا عمل ہے۔ ظلم و بربریت کے ذریعے مسخر کرنا اور بے بسی سیکھی۔

      برٹش ایمپائر کے خلاف نوآبادیاتی انقلاب میں امریکہ کی بہن ملک ہندوستان اور دونوں کی بنیاد سیکولر جمہوریت پر کیسے آتی ہے؟

      میں نے 30 جنوری 2020 کی میری پوسٹ میں غیر مساوی طاقت کے عمل کو بیان کیا جس کے تحت انقلابات ظالم بن جاتے ہیں، ہندوستان نے ہندو قوم پرستی کی زنجیروں کو پھینکنا شروع کیا: نئے شہریت قانون پر بڑے پیمانے پر احتجاج کی لہر اور ریاست کی طرف سے سپریم کورٹ میں چیلنج کیرالہ کے؛ جمہوری معاشرے کے دو اہم سوالات ایشو پر ہیں۔ فرنچائز، جس کو ووٹ دیا جاتا ہے، اور شہریت، جسے ہندوستانی ہونا ملتا ہے۔ مودی کی ہندو قوم پرست حکومت کے ساتھ مسئلہ یہ ہے کہ برطانوی استعمار اور سامراجی حکمرانی کے خلاف طویل جدوجہد میں ہندومت کو متحد کرنے والے اصول کے طور پر اہمیت دینے کے نتیجے میں نہ صرف آزادی حاصل ہوئی ہے بلکہ دیگر غیر ہندو لوگوں میں بھی جن کو قوم پرست اب شہریت دینے سے انکار کر دیں گے۔ اس کے تمام قانونی p

گردش

      قلم کے ایک ہی جھٹکے میں مودی ایک تکثیری اور جامع ماڈل جمہوریت کو خون، ایمان اور مٹی کی فاشسٹ ریاست میں بدل دے گا۔ خود کو اس کے ظالم کے طور پر۔

       ہندوستان حیران کن پیچیدگیوں اور تنوع کی ایک قوم ہے، جس میں تمام چیزیں تاریخی معانی اور گونج کے ساتھ پرتیں ہیں جو دس ہزار سال کی مسلسل تہذیب میں پھیلی ہوئی ہیں، جو کہ بابل سے تین گنا پرانی ہے جیسا کہ ویدوں میں بیان کردہ زمینی شکلوں سے ملتا ہے، جو بنی نوع انسان کی قدیم ترین تحریروں میں سے ہے۔ ریکارڈز ہندوستان میں 67 ثقافتیں ہیں، اور اس کی 850 زبانوں اور بولیوں میں سے 14 سرکاری زبانیں ہیں۔ آزادی تک، یہ 562 خودمختار ریاستوں کی بساط تھی، ہر ایک کے اپنے قوانین، فوجیں، پوسٹل سسٹم، اشرافیہ؛ اور اسے مزید مسلسل اگرچہ اب غیر قانونی ذات پات کے نظام نے سماجی سطح بندی کی تقریباً تین ہزار تہوں میں تقسیم کر دیا، ہر ایک کی اپنی ثقافتی روایات اور سماجی افعال کو کنٹرول کرنے والے اصول ہیں۔

      اس فہرست میں عقیدے کی تقسیم کو شامل کرنا ضروری ہے، حالانکہ ہندومت، جو کہ 80% اکثریتی ہے، وسیع پیمانے پر شامل ہے اور اس میں اصل دراوڑیوں اور بعد میں آریائی ہجرت کے دیوتاؤں اور افسانوں کے دو مختلف مجموعے شامل ہیں، جن سے جین مت اور بدھ مت کی شاخیں ہیں، وجرایانا۔ بدھ مت جس کا مطالعہ میں نے نیپال میں کاگیو آرڈر کے راہب کے طور پر کیا تھا خاص طور پر تبتی بدھ مت اور شمالی ہندوستانی شیویت اور تانترک ہندو مت کا ایک ہائبرڈ ہونے کے ناطے، ہندو مت کے جڑواں اثرات جن کا میں نے پہلے کالی کی ایک پجاری کے ساتھ مطالعہ کیا تھا، اور سکھ ایک مصالحتی ہائبرڈ ہیں۔ ہندومت اور اسلام کا۔ ابراہیمی عقائد میں سے، مسلمانوں کی تعداد ہندوستانیوں میں 14% سے زیادہ ہے، اور 2% سے زیادہ عیسائی ہیں۔ سینٹ تھامس 52 عیسوی میں مالابار کے ساحل پر اترے اور کیرالہ میں سات گرجا گھروں کی بنیاد رکھی، جنہوں نے چوتھی صدی میں انطاکیہ کی شامی عبادت کو اپنایا، اور جیسوئٹ مشنری سینٹ فرانسس زیویئر 1542 میں گوا پہنچے۔ کشمیر خود 98 فیصد اسلامی ہے، اور اس کی صوفیانہ شکل تصوف کا ایک بڑا مرکز اور وطن، جس کا میں نے سرینگر میں نقشبندی آرڈر کے ایک عالم کے طور پر مطالعہ کیا تھا، اور کشمیر میں عام طور پر صوفیانہ اسلام اور اس کے صوفی احکامات نے بدھ مت اور بدھ مت دونوں کے عناصر اور مضامین کو ضم کر لیا ہے، جو بدھ مت کے متوازی ہیں۔ شمالی ہندوستان میں سنکریٹک ہائبرڈائزیشن۔

      صدیوں سے، ہندو اور اسلامی کمیونٹیز کشمیر میں، عقائد کی آمیزش کے مقام تک پرامن طور پر ایک ساتھ رہ رہے تھے، یہاں تک کہ باہر سے مداخلت کرنے والی قوتوں نے اقتدار کی خدمت میں عقیدے کو شناختی سیاست کے طور پر استعمال کیا، اور اس سب کو توڑ دیا۔

      ہندوستان جیسی قوم کو برطانوی سلطنت جیسے ظالمانہ اور غدارانہ قبضے کے خلاف مزاحمت میں کیسے متحد کر سکتا ہے؟ قوم پرستی اور شناخت کی اپیلیں آزادی کی جدوجہد میں طاقتور ہتھیار ہیں۔ ایسی مابعد نوآبادیاتی جانشین ریاستوں کا مسئلہ یہ ہے کہ وہ اپنے انقلابی دور کے شناختی، عسکری اور آمرانہ ڈھانچے اور خصوصیات کو طاقت اور کنٹرول کے ظالموں کے طور پر وراثت میں حاصل کرتے ہیں۔

      جیسا کہ میں نے 10 مارچ 2020 کی اپنی پوسٹ میں لکھا تھا، کشمیر: انڈیا کی ایمپائر آف فیر کے سائے میں۔ بڑے پیمانے پر گرفتاریاں اور گمشدگیاں، سات ماہ بعد 5 مارچ کو انٹرنیٹ پر مکمل بلیک آؤٹ اور ڈی فیکٹو محاصرہ اٹھا لیا گیا، قابض افواج کی بربریت کے گواہوں کو اندھا کرنا، بدنام زمانہ ٹارچر سینٹرز اور شہداء کے قبرستان؛ کشمیر پر بھارت کی سامراجی فتح نسل کشی بن چکی ہے۔

       اس محاصرے سے کشمیر کی معیشت کو ڈھائی ارب ڈالر کا نقصان پہنچا، بلکہ انسانیت کے خلاف ایک جرم کو دنیا کی نظروں سے چھپایا گیا۔ بھارت میں مذہبی اور نسلی اقلیتوں کی نسل کشی اور اختلاف رائے کا وحشیانہ جبر۔ کشمیر کی آزادی کو سلب کرنے میں مودی اور ہندو قوم پرستوں کا اصل مقصد یہی تھا۔ سابق حکومت کے سیاسی رہنماؤں کی بڑے پیمانے پر قید نے اس کی منظم مزاحمت کا سر قلم کر دیا، اور نسلی تطہیر کی مہم نے بھارت کے فاشسٹ ریاستی دہشت گردی کے ذریعے کشمیر کو ہڑپ کرنے کا اشارہ دیا۔

     اسلامی کشمیر اور ہندو جموں کی سابقہ ریاست 1947 سے پاکستان اور بھارت کے درمیان خانہ جنگی اور تسلط کی براہ راست جنگ کی وجہ سے تقسیم ہے۔ میں سری نگر میں رہ رہا تھا جب 1990 میں وادی کشمیر نسلی تنازعات، انقلاب اور جنگ میں پھٹ گئی۔ ہندو قوم پرستوں کے فسادی ہجوم کو ہندوستانی اسپیشل آپریشن یونٹس نے منظم اور تقویت بخشی، جسے برطانوی راج نے سامراجی فتح کا سب سے خوفناک ہتھیار بنایا، شروع ہوا۔ گاؤں اور مساجد کو جلانے، اجتماعی عصمت دری، بے ترتیب قتل، اور لیڈروں اور کارکنوں اور واقعی کسی اور کے اغوا، تشدد، اور قتل کی معمول کی مہم۔ پاکستان نے افغانستان میں سوویت یونین کے خلاف 1980 کی جنگ کے دوران امریکہ کے ساتھ شراکت داری میں تیار کیے گئے فوج اور انٹر سروسز انٹیلی جنس ایجنسی کے تحفظ اور رحم کے مشن اور خصوصی آپریشن یونٹ بھیجے، اور برسوں کے تجربے کے ساتھ ان مجاہدین کی حمایت کی جن کے ساتھ وہ کام کر رہے ہیں۔ آج

     ہندوستان کے ہندو قوم پرستوں کی طرف سے بتائی گئی کہانی واقعات کی اس تاریخ کو پلٹتی ہے اور جہادیوں کے ذریعہ ہندو پنڈتوں کی نسلی صفائی پر توجہ مرکوز کرتی ہے۔

پاکستان کے اثاثے، بلاشبہ انسانیت کے خلاف جرم اور ریاست کا مقدمہ مجسم تشدد کے طور پر۔ میرے لیے سب سے اہم بات یہ نہیں ہے کہ پہلا پتھر کس نے پھینکا، بلکہ یہ ہے کہ ہماری انسانیت اور تہذیب کی مشترکہ اقدار کی پامالی اور انحطاط تاریخی صدمے یا ایپی جینیٹک نقصانات کا نتیجہ نہیں تھا بلکہ سامراجی تسلط کے تنازعہ کا نتیجہ تھا۔ کشمیر کی خواہش

      آزادی کے لیے سڑکوں پر لاکھوں لوگوں کے مظاہرے، بے ترتیب تشدد اور ہجوم کی حکمرانی، اور اب تک کی بہترین بلیک آپس یونٹس کے درمیان کھلی جنگ کے ساتھ، کشمیر افراتفری اور بربادی میں بدل گیا۔ صرف یہ حقیقت کہ ہندوستان سیاسی طور پر متحد نہیں تھا تین سال کے پاگل پن اور وحشت کے بعد فتح کی ناکامی کا سبب بنتا ہے۔ مودی کے انتخاب کے ساتھ ہی ہندوستان میں مقصد کا اختلاف ختم ہوا۔

      اور یہ وہ جگہ ہے جہاں ہم تبدیلی کا فائدہ اٹھا سکتے ہیں، کیونکہ ہندوستان کی ظلم اور دہشت کی ہندو قوم پرست حکومت نہ تو ڈھکی چھپی ہے اور نہ ہی عام نسل پرستی اور مذہبی عدم رواداری کی، بلکہ دنیا کے اسٹیج پر حکومت کی طرف سے ظلم اور خوف کا ایک تھیٹر ہے۔

      میں بھارت کے بائیکاٹ، تقسیم اور منظوری کا مطالبہ کرتا ہوں جب تک کہ وہ کشمیر کو ترک نہیں کرتا اور اس کی خودمختاری اور آزادی کو تسلیم نہیں کرتا۔

     جیسا کہ میں نے اپنی 6 مارچ 2020 کی پوسٹ میں لکھا تھا۔ ہندو قوم پرستوں کے تحت ہندوستان لاٹھیوں کی قوم بن گیا ہے، ایک میٹر لمبا کلب جسے جبر کی قوتیں اپنی مخصوص برادریوں سے دوسرے کو بھگانے کے لیے استعمال کرتی ہیں۔ یہ ایک قدیم ڈراؤنا خواب ہے اور سب سے زیادہ خوفناک ہے۔ سب کو ایک جیسا بنانے کے لیے۔

      میرے لیے اس کا ایک خاص معنی ہے، یہ یکسانیت۔ میری ابتدائی یادوں میں سے ایک جلتی ہوئی کراس ہے جسے ہمارے پڑوسیوں نے ایک نوبیاہتا جوڑے کے سامنے کے لان میں آگ لگا دی تھی، اس سے پہلے دو ہزار کے قریب ایک قصبے میں مشعل بردار ہجوم میں سے بہت سے لوگوں کے دوست اور رشتہ دار تھے، یہ دیگرنگ کی کارنیوالسک رسم میں۔ ریفارمڈ چرچ کے ایک ڈچ آدمی نے جنوبی افریقہ کی نسل پرست حکومت کے ساتھ اتحاد کیا، ہیری پوٹر کے ولن یا اسٹار ٹریک کے سیون آف نائن جیسے سفید بالوں والے خوفناک جنات، جو موسیقی کو گناہ سے بھرپور سمجھتے تھے، کنگ جیمز بائبل انگریزی میں تھیس سے بھری ہوئی تھی اور ہزاروں کی طرح۔ ڈچ کے لیے ایک دوسری زبان، خفیہ اور دور دراز، اور جس کے لیے ان کے سیاہ کپڑوں کے بٹنوں کو غیر بائبلی ٹیکنالوجی کے طور پر منع کیا گیا تھا، اس نے ہماری مقامی اقلیتی برادری کی ایک خاتون سے شادی کی تھی، ہنسنے والی اور زمینی، پولکا رقص، چورا پٹ کشتی سوئس کیلونسٹ۔ چرچ، جو سوئس جرمن کے نشانات کے ساتھ معیاری امریکی انگریزی بولتا تھا، اور سوئس ہال میں بارہ سال سے زیادہ عمر کے ہر فرد کو بیئر پیش کرتا تھا، جہاں فینسی ڈریس لیڈر ہوسین تھا، حالانکہ وہ عام طور پر دوسرے امریکیوں کی طرح لباس پہنتے اور کام کرتے تھے اور اس سے بھی اہم بات یہ ہے کہ وہ ان کے ساتھ بات چیت کرتے تھے۔ چرچ کی رکنیت سے قطع نظر کوئی بھی اپنے گروپ سے باہر۔ کلیسیائی برادریوں کے درمیان حدود کی اس خلاف ورزی کا جو دونوں کیلون ازم میں شروع ہوا تھا، ہمارے شہر نے اسے مخلوط شادی کہہ کر اور اپنے لان پر صلیب جلا کر جواب دیا۔

      میں اور میری والدہ یہ دیکھنے کے لیے باہر نکلے تھے کہ کیا آگ لگی ہے اور اس نفرت انگیز جرم کا منظر دریافت کیا، ایک کونے میں چکر لگاتے ہوئے اور اچانک سینکڑوں لوگوں کے درمیان دوڑ پڑے۔

     ایک لڑکا جس کو میں اسکول سے جانتا تھا، ٹارچ اٹھائے، مسکراتا اور چیختا ہوا بھاگا۔ “ہم بدکاروں کو نکال رہے ہیں!”

      تو میں نے اپنی والدہ سے پوچھا کہ ظالم کون ہیں؟

       بہت بے رحم نظر آتے ہوئے، اس نے جواب دیا؛ مشعل والے لوگ بدکردار ہیں۔ وہ دشمن ہیں، اور وہ ہمیشہ ہمارے، تمہارے اور میرے دشمن ہیں، چاہے وہ کسی کے لیے آئے ہوں۔”

     ’’وہ برے کیوں ہیں؟‘‘

      “کیونکہ وہ سب کو ایک جیسا بنانا چاہتے ہیں۔”

      اور اس کی ہمیں آخری حد تک مزاحمت کرنی چاہیے، کیونکہ اس کے علاوہ کوئی چارہ نہیں ہے۔ جو لوگ منتخب نہیں ہیں ان کا تعاقب کرنے والی قوتیں تباہی کی طرف جائیں گی۔ صرف ان کی موت کا طریقہ سوال میں ہے، تسلیم کرنے یا مزاحمت میں۔

      جب تک کہ ہم سب ایک ساتھ کھڑے نہ ہوں، ایک ایسی اٹوٹ انسانی زنجیر میں متحد نہ ہوں جس کی طاقت ہم میں سے کسی ایک یا کسی بھی قوم کی طاقت سے زیادہ ہو، جو لہروں کی طرح وسیع اور رک نہیں سکتی۔

      جیسا کہ شاندار اروندتی رائے نے 2008 میں دی گارڈین میں لکھا، زمین اور آزادی کے عنوان سے ایک مضمون میں: کشمیر بحران میں ہے: خطے کے مسلمان بھارتی حکومت کی حکمرانی کے خلاف زبردست عدم تشدد کے مظاہرے کر رہے ہیں۔ لیکن، اروندھتی رائے پوچھتی ہیں، اس علاقے کی آزادی کا اس کے لوگوں کے لیے کیا مطلب ہوگا؟ “گزشتہ 60 دنوں سے، تقریباً جون کے آخر سے، کشمیر کے لوگ آزاد ہیں۔ انتہائی گہرے معنوں میں مفت۔ انہوں نے دنیا کے سب سے گھنے عسکری زون میں، نصف ملین بھاری مسلح فوجیوں کی بندوقوں کی نظروں میں اپنی زندگی بسر کرنے کی دہشت کو ترک کر دیا ہے۔

      18 سال تک فوجی قبضے کے بعد بھارتی حکومت کا بدترین خواب پورا ہو گیا۔ یہ اعلان کرنے کے بعد کہ عسکریت پسند تحریک کو کچل دیا گیا ہے، اسے اب ایک غیر متشدد عوامی احتجاج کا سامنا ہے، لیکن اس قسم کا نہیں جس کا انتظام کرنا اسے معلوم ہے۔ یہ لوگوں کی برسوں کے جبر کی یادوں سے پروان چڑھتا ہے جس میں دسیوں ہزار مارے گئے، ہزاروں “غائب” ہو چکے ہیں۔

ہزاروں کی تعداد میں تشدد، زخمی اور ذلیل۔ اس قسم کے غصے کو، ایک بار جب اسے بولنا مل جاتا ہے، اسے آسانی سے قابو میں نہیں رکھا جا سکتا، اسے دوبارہ بند کر کے واپس بھیجا جا سکتا ہے جہاں سے یہ آیا تھا۔

      قسمت کا اچانک موڑ، ریاستی جنگلات کی 100 ایکڑ اراضی امرناتھ شرائن بورڈ (جو کشمیر ہمالیہ میں گہرے غار میں سالانہ ہندو یاترا کا انتظام کرتا ہے) کو منتقل کرنے کے بارے میں ایک غیر سوچی سمجھی حرکت اچانک روشنی پھینکنے کے مترادف ہو گئی۔ پیٹرول کے ایک بیرل میں میچ کریں۔ 1989 تک امرناتھ یاترا تقریباً 20,000 لوگوں کو اپنی طرف متوجہ کرتی تھی جو تقریباً دو ہفتوں کے عرصے میں امرناتھ غار کا سفر کرتے تھے۔ 1990 میں، جب وادی میں واضح طور پر اسلام پسند عسکریت پسند بغاوت ہندوستان کے میدانی علاقوں میں پرتشدد ہندو قوم پرستی (ہندوتوا) کے پھیلنے کے ساتھ ہی ہوئی، یاتریوں کی تعداد میں تیزی سے اضافہ ہونا شروع ہوا۔ 2008 تک 500,000 سے زیادہ حجاج کرام نے زیارت کی۔

      امرناتھ غار، بڑے گروپوں میں، ان کے گزرنے کو اکثر ہندوستانی کاروباری گھرانوں کی طرف سے سپانسر کیا جاتا ہے۔ وادی میں بہت سے لوگوں کے نزدیک تعداد میں اس ڈرامائی اضافے کو ایک بڑھتے ہوئے ہندو بنیاد پرست ہندوستانی ریاست کے جارحانہ سیاسی بیان کے طور پر دیکھا گیا۔ صحیح یا غلط، زمین کی منتقلی کو پچر کے پتلے کنارے کے طور پر دیکھا جاتا تھا۔ اس نے ایک خدشہ پیدا کیا کہ یہ اسرائیلی طرز کی بستیوں کی تعمیر اور وادی کی آبادی کو تبدیل کرنے کے ایک وسیع منصوبے کا آغاز تھا۔

      کئی دنوں تک جاری رہنے والے زبردست احتجاج نے وادی کو مکمل طور پر بند کرنے پر مجبور کر دیا۔ چند گھنٹوں میں احتجاج شہروں سے دیہات تک پھیل گیا۔ نوجوان پتھراؤ کرنے والے سڑکوں پر نکل آئے اور مسلح پولیس کا سامنا کرنا پڑا جنہوں نے ان پر سیدھی گولیاں چلائیں، جس سے متعدد افراد مارے گئے۔ لوگوں کے ساتھ ساتھ حکومت کے لیے، اس نے 90 کی دہائی کے اوائل میں ہونے والی بغاوت کی یادیں تازہ کر دیں۔ کئی ہفتوں کے احتجاج، ہرتال (ہڑتالوں) اور پولیس فائرنگ کے دوران، جب کہ ہندوتوا کی تشہیر کی مشین نے کشمیریوں پر ہر قسم کی فرقہ وارانہ زیادتی کا الزام لگایا، 500,000 امرناتھ یاتریوں نے اپنی یاترا مکمل کی، نہ صرف تکلیف پہنچی، بلکہ ان کی مہمان نوازی سے متاثر ہوئے۔ مقامی لوگوں کی طرف سے.

      آخر کار، ردعمل کی بے رحمی پر پوری طرح حیرانی سے، حکومت نے زمین کی منتقلی کو منسوخ کر دیا۔ لیکن تب تک زمین کی منتقلی وہ بن چکی تھی جسے سید علی شاہ گیلانی، جو سب سے سینئر اور سب سے زیادہ واضح طور پر اسلام پسند علیحدگی پسند رہنما تھے، نے ایک “نان ایشو” کہا۔

      جموں میں منسوخی کے خلاف زبردست مظاہرے پھوٹ پڑے۔ وہاں بھی، یہ مسئلہ بہت بڑی چیز بن گیا۔ ہندوؤں نے بھارتی ریاست کی طرف سے نظرانداز اور امتیازی سلوک کے مسائل اٹھانا شروع کر دیے۔ (کچھ عجیب و غریب وجہ سے انہوں نے اس غفلت کا الزام کشمیریوں کو ٹھہرایا۔) مظاہروں کی وجہ سے جموں سری نگر ہائی وے بلاک ہو گئی، جو کشمیر اور بھارت کے درمیان واحد فعال روڈ لنک ہے۔ خراب ہونے والے تازہ پھلوں اور وادی کی پیداوار کے ٹرکوں سے لدے سڑنے لگے۔

      ناکہ بندی نے کشمیر کے لوگوں کے سامنے کسی غیر یقینی صورت حال کا مظاہرہ کیا کہ وہ مصائب کی زندگی گزار رہے ہیں، اور یہ کہ اگر وہ خود برتاؤ نہیں کرتے ہیں تو انہیں محاصرے میں رکھا جا سکتا ہے، بھوکا رکھا جا سکتا ہے، ضروری اشیاء اور طبی سامان سے محروم رکھا جا سکتا ہے۔

      معاملات کے ختم ہونے کی توقع کرنا یقیناً مضحکہ خیز تھا۔ کیا کسی نے اس بات پر غور نہیں کیا کہ کشمیر میں پانی اور بجلی جیسے شہری مسائل پر ہونے والے معمولی احتجاج بھی لامحالہ آزادی، آزادی کے مطالبات میں بدل جاتے ہیں؟ انہیں بڑے پیمانے پر فاقہ کشی کی دھمکی دینا سیاسی خودکشی کے مترادف ہے۔

      حیرت کی بات نہیں ہے کہ حکومت ہند نے کشمیر میں جس آواز کو خاموش کرنے کی بہت کوشش کی ہے وہ ایک گونجنے والی گرج میں تبدیل ہو گئی ہے۔ فوجی کیمپوں، چوکیوں اور بنکروں کے کھیل کے میدان میں اٹھائے گئے ٹارچر چیمبروں کی چیخوں کے ساتھ آواز اٹھانے کے لیے، نوجوان نسل نے اچانک عوامی احتجاج کی طاقت کو دریافت کیا ہے، اور سب سے بڑھ کر یہ کہ اپنے کندھے سیدھا کرنے اور بولنے کے قابل ہونے کا وقار۔ خود، خود کی نمائندگی کرتے ہیں. اُن کے لیے یہ کسی بھی قسم کی افادیت سے کم نہیں۔ موت کا خوف بھی ان کو روکتا دکھائی نہیں دیتا۔ اور ایک بار جب یہ خوف ختم ہو جائے تو دنیا کی سب سے بڑی یا دوسری بڑی فوج کا کیا فائدہ؟

      ماضی میں بڑے پیمانے پر ریلیاں ہوتی رہی ہیں، لیکن حالیہ یادوں میں کوئی بھی ایسی ریلیاں نہیں جو اتنی پائیدار اور وسیع رہی ہوں۔ کشمیر کی مرکزی دھارے کی سیاسی جماعتیں – نیشنل کانفرنس اور پیپلز ڈیموکریٹک پارٹی – نئی دہلی کے ٹی وی اسٹوڈیوز میں مباحثوں کے لیے فرض شناس نظر آتی ہیں، لیکن کشمیر کی سڑکوں پر آنے کی ہمت نہیں کر پاتی ہیں۔ مسلح عسکریت پسند، جنہیں بدترین جبر کے دوران آزادی کی مشعل کو آگے لے جانے والے واحد کے طور پر دیکھا گیا، اگر وہ بالکل بھی آس پاس ہیں، تو وہ پیچھے بیٹھنے پر راضی نظر آتے ہیں اور لوگوں کو تبدیلی کی لڑائی لڑنے دیتے ہیں۔

      علیحدگی پسند رہنما جو ریلیوں میں نظر آتے ہیں اور تقریر کرتے ہیں وہ لیڈر نہیں ہیں جتنے پیروکار ہیں، جو کشمیر کی سڑکوں پر پھٹنے والے پنجرے میں بند، مشتعل لوگوں کی غیر معمولی بے ساختہ توانائی سے رہنمائی حاصل کر رہے ہیں۔ دن بہ دن، لاکھوں لوگ ان جگہوں کے گرد گھومتے ہیں جو ان کے لیے خوفناک یادیں رکھتی ہیں۔ وہ بنکروں کو مسمار کرتے ہیں، کنسرٹینا کے تاروں کو توڑتے ہیں اور فوجیوں کی مشین گنوں کے بیرل کو سیدھا گھورتے ہیں، وہ کہتے ہیں جو ہندوستان میں بہت کم لوگ سننا چاہتے ہیں۔ ہم کیا

چاہتے؟ آزادی! (ہم آزادی چاہتے ہیں۔) اور، برابر تعداد میں اور یکساں شدت کے ساتھ کہنا پڑے گا: جیوے جیوے پاکستان۔ (پاکستان زندہ باد)

      یہ آواز وادی میں ایسے گونجتی ہے جیسے ٹین کی چھت پر مسلسل بارش کے ڈھول کی دھڑکن، بجلی کے طوفان کے دوران گرج چمک کی طرح۔

      15 اگست کو ہندوستان کے یوم آزادی کے موقع پر، سری نگر کے اعصابی مرکز لال چوک کو ہزاروں لوگوں نے اپنی لپیٹ میں لے لیا جنہوں نے پاکستانی پرچم لہرائے اور ایک دوسرے کو “ہیپی دیر سے یوم آزادی” کی مبارکباد دی غلامی کا دن” مزاح ظاہر ہے، کشمیر میں بھارت کے کئی ٹارچر سینٹرز اور ابوغریب سے بچ گیا ہے۔

      16 اگست کو 300,000 سے زیادہ لوگوں نے پمپور کی طرف حریت رہنما شیخ عبدالعزیز کے گاؤں کی طرف مارچ کیا، جنہیں پانچ دن پہلے ہی سردی میں گولی مار دی گئی تھی۔

      17 اگست کی رات پولیس نے شہر کو سیل کر دیا۔ سڑکوں پر رکاوٹیں کھڑی کر دی گئیں، ہزاروں مسلح پولیس نے رکاوٹیں کھڑی کر دیں۔ سری نگر جانے والی سڑکیں بلاک کر دی گئیں۔ 18 اگست کی صبح، وادی بھر کے دیہاتوں اور قصبوں سے لوگ سری نگر میں آنا شروع ہو گئے۔ ٹرکوں، ٹیمپوز، جیپوں، بسوں میں اور پیدل۔ ایک بار پھر، رکاوٹیں ٹوٹ گئیں اور لوگوں نے اپنے شہر پر دوبارہ دعویٰ کیا۔ پولیس کو یا تو ایک طرف ہٹنے یا قتل عام کو انجام دینے کے انتخاب کا سامنا تھا۔ وہ ایک طرف ہٹ گئے۔ ایک گولی بھی نہیں چلائی گئی۔

      شہر مسکراہٹوں کے سمندر پر تیرتا رہا۔ فضا میں جوش تھا۔ ہر ایک کے پاس بینر تھا۔ ہاؤس بوٹ کے مالکان، تاجر، طلباء، وکلاء، ڈاکٹر۔ ایک نے کہا: “ہم سب قیدی ہیں، ہمیں آزاد کرو۔” ایک اور نے کہا: “آزادی کے بغیر جمہوریت شیطانی پاگل ہے۔” شیطان پاگل۔ یہ ایک اچھا تھا. شاید وہ اس پاگل پن کی طرف اشارہ کر رہے تھے جو دنیا کی سب سے بڑی جمہوریت کو دنیا کے سب سے بڑے فوجی قبضے کا انتظام کرنے اور خود کو جمہوریت کہنے کی اجازت دیتا ہے۔

      ہر لیمپ پوسٹ، ہر چھت، ہر بس اسٹاپ اور چنار کے درختوں کی چوٹی پر سبز جھنڈا تھا۔ آل انڈیا ریڈیو کی عمارت کے باہر ایک بڑا پھڑپڑا۔ سڑک کے نشانات پر پینٹ کیا گیا تھا۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ راولپنڈی۔ یا صرف پاکستان؟ یہ تصور کرنا غلط ہوگا کہ پاکستان کے لیے عوامی محبت کا اظہار خود بخود پاکستان سے الحاق کی خواہش میں بدل جاتا ہے۔ اس میں سے کچھ کا تعلق اس حمایت کے لیے شکر گزاری کے ساتھ ہے – مذموم یا دوسری صورت میں – جسے کشمیری اپنی جدوجہد آزادی کے طور پر دیکھتے ہیں، اور ہندوستانی ریاست ایک دہشت گرد مہم کے طور پر دیکھتی ہے۔ اس کا تعلق شرارت سے بھی ہے۔ کہنے اور کرنے سے جو ہندوستان کو سب سے زیادہ پریشان کرتا ہے۔ (ایک “آزادی کی جدوجہد” کے خیال کا مذاق اڑانا آسان ہے جو خود کو ایک ایسے ملک سے دور کرنا چاہتا ہے جسے جمہوریت سمجھا جاتا ہے اور خود کو کسی دوسرے کے ساتھ جوڑنا چاہتا ہے جس پر زیادہ تر فوجی آمروں کی حکومت رہی ہے۔ فوج نے اس وقت بنگلہ دیش میں نسل کشی کی ہے، ایک ایسا ملک جو اس وقت اپنی نسلی جنگ سے ٹوٹ پھوٹ کا شکار ہے، یہ اہم سوالات ہیں، لیکن اس وقت یہ سوچنا زیادہ مفید ہے کہ اس نام نہاد جمہوریت نے کشمیر میں کیا کیا؟ لوگ اس سے نفرت کرتے ہیں؟)

      ہر طرف پاکستان کے جھنڈے، ہر طرف رونا پاکستان سے رشتہ کیا؟ لا الہ الا اللہ۔ (پاکستان کے ساتھ ہمارا کیا رشتہ ہے؟ اللہ کے سوا کوئی معبود نہیں۔) Azadi ka matlab kya? لا الہ الا اللہ۔ (آزادی کا مطلب کیا ہے؟ اللہ کے سوا کوئی معبود نہیں۔)

      میرے جیسے کسی کے لیے، جو مسلمان نہیں ہے، آزادی کی اس تشریح کو سمجھنا مشکل ہے – اگر ناممکن نہیں تو -۔ میں نے ایک نوجوان خاتون سے پوچھا کہ کیا کشمیر کی آزادی کا مطلب عورت کی حیثیت سے اس کے لیے کم آزادی نہیں ہے؟ وہ کندھے اچکا کر بولی “اب ہمارے پاس کیسی آزادی ہے؟ ہندوستانی فوجیوں کے ہاتھوں زیادتی کی آزادی؟” اس کے جواب نے مجھے خاموش کر دیا۔

     سبز جھنڈوں کے سمندر میں گھرے ہوئے، میرے ارد گرد ہونے والی بغاوت کے گہرے اسلامی جذبے پر شک کرنا یا نظر انداز کرنا ناممکن تھا۔ اسے ایک شیطانی، دہشت گرد جہاد کا لیبل لگانا بھی اتنا ہی ناممکن تھا۔ کشمیریوں کے لیے یہ کیتھرسس تھا۔ آزادی کی جدوجہد میں تمام خامیوں، ظلم اور الجھنوں کے ساتھ آزادی کی طویل اور پیچیدہ جدوجہد کا ایک تاریخی لمحہ۔ یہ کسی بھی طرح سے اپنے آپ کو قدیم نہیں کہہ سکتا، اور ہمیشہ اس کی وجہ سے بدنامی کا شکار رہے گا، اور کیا کسی دن، مجھے امید ہے کہ، دیگر چیزوں کے علاوہ، بغاوت کے ابتدائی سالوں میں کشمیری پنڈتوں کے وحشیانہ قتل کا حساب دینا پڑے گا، جس کا اختتام وادی کشمیر سے تقریباً پوری ہندو برادری کا اخراج۔

      جوں جوں ہجوم بڑھتا رہا میں نے نعروں کو غور سے سنا، کیونکہ بیان بازی میں اکثر ہر قسم کی سمجھ کی کلید ہوتی ہے۔ بھارت کے لیے بے شمار طعنے اور ذلتیں تھیں: اے جبیرون آئے ظالم، کشمیر ہمارا چھوڑ دو (اے ظالمو، اے ظالمو، ہمارے کشمیر سے نکل جاؤ۔) وہ نعرہ جس نے مجھے چھری کی طرح کاٹ کر میرا دل توڑ دیا۔ ایک: نانگا بھوکا ہندوستان، جان سے پیارا پاکستان۔ (ننگا، بھوکا بھارت، جان سے بھی زیادہ قیمتی – پاکستان۔)

      یہ سننا اتنا دردناک، اتنا دردناک کیوں تھا؟ میں نے اسے ختم کرنے کی کوشش کی اور تین وجوہات پر طے کیا۔ سب سے پہلے، کیونکہ ہم سب جانتے ہیں کہ ایس کا پہلا حصہ

لوگان ابھرتی ہوئی سپر پاور، بھارت کے بارے میں شرمناک اور بے ڈھنگی سچائی ہے۔ دوسرا، کیونکہ تمام ہندوستانی جو نانگا یا بھوکا نہیں ہیں، پیچیدہ اور تاریخی طریقوں سے ان وسیع ثقافتی اور معاشی نظاموں کے ساتھ جڑے ہوئے ہیں جو ہندوستانی سماج کو اتنا ظالمانہ، بے ہودہ غیر مساوی بنا دیتے ہیں۔ اور تیسرا، کیونکہ ان لوگوں کو سننا تکلیف دہ تھا جنہوں نے خود بہت زیادہ اذیتیں برداشت کی ہیں جو دوسروں کا مذاق اڑاتے ہیں، مختلف طریقوں سے، لیکن کم شدت کے ساتھ، ایک ہی ظالم کے تحت۔ اس نعرے میں میں نے اس بات کا بیج دیکھا کہ متاثرین کتنی آسانی سے مجرم بن سکتے ہیں۔

      سید علی شاہ گیلانی نے اپنے خطاب کا آغاز تلاوت قرآن سے کیا۔ اس نے پھر وہی کہا جو وہ پہلے بھی کہہ چکے ہیں، سینکڑوں مواقع پر۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ جدوجہد کی کامیابی کا واحد راستہ رہنمائی کے لیے قرآن کی طرف رجوع کرنا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اسلام جدوجہد کی رہنمائی کرے گا اور یہ ایک مکمل سماجی اور اخلاقی ضابطہ ہے جو آزاد کشمیر کے لوگوں پر حکومت کرے گا۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پاکستان اسلام کے گھر کے طور پر بنایا گیا تھا اور اس مقصد کو کبھی پامال نہیں ہونا چاہیے۔ انہوں نے کہا جس طرح پاکستان کشمیر کا ہے اسی طرح کشمیر بھی پاکستان کا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اقلیتی برادریوں کو مکمل حقوق حاصل ہوں گے اور ان کی عبادت گاہیں محفوظ ہوں گی۔ اس کے ہر نکتے کو سراہا گیا۔

      میں نے اپنے آپ کو ایک ہندو قوم پرست ریلی کے دل میں کھڑا تصور کیا جس سے بھارتیہ جنتا پارٹی (بی جے پی) کے ایل کے ایڈوانی خطاب کر رہے تھے۔ لفظ اسلام کو ہندوتوا کے لفظ سے بدل دیں، لفظ پاکستان کو ہندستان سے بدل دیں، سبز جھنڈوں کی جگہ زعفرانی جھنڈیاں لگائیں اور ہمارے پاس ایک مثالی ہندوستان کا بی جے پی کا ڈراؤنا خواب ہوگا۔

      کیا ہمیں اپنے مستقبل کے طور پر یہی قبول کرنا چاہیے؟ یک سنگی مذہبی ریاستیں ایک مکمل سماجی اور اخلاقی ضابطہ، “ایک مکمل طرز زندگی” کے حوالے کر رہی ہیں؟ ہندوستان میں ہم لاکھوں لوگ ہندوتوا کے منصوبے کو مسترد کرتے ہیں۔ ہمارا انکار محبت سے، جذبے سے، ایک قسم کی آئیڈیلزم سے، جس معاشرے میں ہم رہتے ہیں اس میں بہت زیادہ جذباتی داؤ پر لگنے سے پیدا ہوتا ہے۔ ہمارے پڑوسی کیا کرتے ہیں، وہ اپنے معاملات کو کس طرح سنبھالتے ہیں اس سے ہماری دلیل پر کوئی اثر نہیں پڑتا، یہ صرف اسے مضبوط کرتا ہے۔

      محبت سے جنم لینے والے دلائل بھی خطرے سے بھرے ہوتے ہیں۔ یہ کشمیر کے لوگوں کے لیے ہے کہ وہ اسلام پسند منصوبے سے متفق ہوں یا اس سے اختلاف کریں (جس کا مقابلہ دنیا بھر میں مسلمانوں نے اسی طرح پیچیدہ طریقوں سے کیا ہے، جیسا کہ ہندوتوا کا ہندوؤں نے مقابلہ کیا ہے)۔ شاید اب جب کہ تشدد کا خطرہ کم ہو گیا ہے اور کچھ جگہ ہے جس میں نظریات اور نظریات پر بحث کی جا سکتی ہے، اب وقت آ گیا ہے کہ جدوجہد کا حصہ بننے والوں کے لیے ایک نقطہ نظر کا خاکہ پیش کریں کہ وہ کس قسم کے معاشرے کے لیے لڑ رہے ہیں۔ شاید اب وقت آگیا ہے کہ لوگوں کو شہیدوں، نعروں اور مبہم عامیوں سے بڑھ کر کچھ پیش کیا جائے۔ جو لوگ ہدایت کے لیے قرآن کی طرف رجوع کرنا چاہتے ہیں وہ بلا شبہ وہاں رہنمائی پائیں گے۔ لیکن ان لوگوں کا کیا ہوگا جو ایسا نہیں کرنا چاہتے، یا جن کے لیے قرآن جگہ نہیں رکھتا؟ کیا جموں کے ہندوؤں اور دیگر اقلیتوں کو بھی حق خود ارادیت حاصل ہے؟ کیا جلاوطنی کی زندگی گزارنے والے لاکھوں کشمیری پنڈتوں کو، جن میں سے بہت سے خوفناک غربت میں ہیں، کو واپسی کا حق ملے گا؟ کیا انہیں ان خوفناک نقصانات کی تلافی کی جائے گی جو انہوں نے اٹھائے ہیں؟ یا آزاد کشمیر اپنی اقلیتوں کے ساتھ وہی کرے گا جو بھارت نے 61 سالوں سے کشمیریوں کے ساتھ کیا ہے؟ ہم جنس پرستوں اور زناکاروں اور توہین رسالت کرنے والوں کا کیا ہوگا؟ چوروں اور لفنگوں اور ادیبوں کا کیا ہوگا جو “مکمل سماجی اور اخلاقی ضابطہ” سے متفق نہیں ہیں؟ کیا ہمیں سعودی عرب کی طرح موت کے گھاٹ اتار دیا جائے گا؟ کیا موت، جبر اور خونریزی کا سلسلہ جاری رہے گا؟ تاریخ کشمیر کے مفکرین، دانشوروں اور سیاست دانوں کو مطالعہ کے لیے بہت سے نمونے پیش کرتی ہے۔ ان کے خوابوں کا کشمیر کیسا ہو گا؟ الجزائر؟ ایران؟ جنوبی افریقہ؟ سوئٹزرلینڈ؟ پاکستان؟

      اس طرح کے اہم وقت میں چند چیزیں خوابوں سے زیادہ اہم ہوتی ہیں۔ ایک سست یوٹوپیا اور انصاف کے ناقص احساس کے ایسے نتائج ہوں گے جن کے بارے میں سوچنا برداشت نہیں کرتا ہے۔ یہ وقت فکری کاہلی یا کسی صورت حال کا صاف اور ایمانداری سے جائزہ لینے میں ہچکچاہٹ کا نہیں ہے۔

      تقسیم کا خوف پہلے ہی سر اٹھا چکا ہے۔ ہندوتوا نیٹ ورک ان افواہوں کے ساتھ زندہ ہیں کہ وادی میں ہندوؤں پر حملہ کیا جا رہا ہے اور انہیں بھاگنے پر مجبور کیا جا رہا ہے۔ جواب میں، جموں سے فون کالز نے اطلاع دی کہ ایک مسلح ہندو ملیشیا قتل عام کی دھمکی دے رہی ہے اور دو ہندو اکثریتی اضلاع سے مسلمان بھاگنے کی تیاری کر رہے ہیں۔ ہندوستان اور پاکستان کی تقسیم کے وقت جو خون خرابہ ہوا تھا اور جس نے دس لاکھ سے زیادہ لوگوں کی جانیں لی تھیں اس کی یادیں پھر سے سیلاب آ گئی ہیں۔ وہ ڈراؤنا خواب ہم سب کو ہمیشہ کے لیے ستائے گا۔

      تاہم، مستقبل کے بارے میں ان میں سے کوئی بھی خوف کسی قوم اور عوام پر مسلسل فوجی قبضے کا جواز پیش نہیں کر سکتا۔ پرانے نوآبادیاتی استدلال سے زیادہ نہیں کہ کس طرح مقامی باشندے آزادی کے لیے تیار نہیں تھے نوآبادیاتی منصوبے کا جواز پیش کیا۔

      یقیناً ہندوستانی ریاست کے پاس کشمیر پر قبضہ جاری رکھنے کے بہت سے طریقے ہیں۔ یہ وہی کرسکتا ہے جو یہ سب سے بہتر کرتا ہے۔ انتظار کرو۔ اور امید ہے کہ ٹھوس منصوبہ بندی کی عدم موجودگی میں عوام کی توانائی ضائع ہو جائے گی۔ یہ اس کمزور اتحاد کو ٹوٹنے کی کوشش کر سکتا ہے۔

ابھرتی ہوئی یہ اس عدم تشدد کی بغاوت کو بجھا سکتا ہے اور مسلح عسکریت پسندی کو دوبارہ دعوت دے سکتا ہے۔ یہ فوجیوں کی تعداد نصف ملین سے بڑھا کر ایک ملین تک لے جا سکتا ہے۔ چند سٹریٹجک قتل عام، ایک دو ٹارگٹ قتل، کچھ گمشدگیاں اور گرفتاریوں کا ایک بڑا دور کچھ اور سالوں تک یہ چال چلنا چاہیے۔

      کشمیر پر فوجی قبضے کو جاری رکھنے کے لیے جن عوامی پیسوں کی ضرورت ہے وہ ناقابل تصور رقم ہے جو ہندوستان میں غریب، غذائی قلت کا شکار آبادی کے لیے اسکولوں اور اسپتالوں اور خوراک پر خرچ کی جانی چاہیے۔ کس قسم کی حکومت ممکنہ طور پر یہ مان سکتی ہے کہ اسے کشمیر میں زیادہ ہتھیاروں، زیادہ کنسرٹینا تاروں اور زیادہ جیلوں پر خرچ کرنے کا حق ہے؟

      کشمیر پر بھارتی فوجی قبضہ ہم سب کو عفریت بنا دیتا ہے۔ یہ ہندو شاونسٹوں کو کشمیر میں مسلمانوں کی طرف سے جاری آزادی کی جدوجہد کو یرغمال بنا کر ہندوستان میں مسلمانوں کو نشانہ بنانے اور ان کا نشانہ بنانے کی اجازت دیتا ہے۔

      بھارت کو کشمیر سے آزادی کی اتنی ہی ضرورت ہے – اگر اس سے زیادہ نہیں – کشمیر کو بھارت سے آزادی کی ضرورت ہے۔

August 4 2024 Madness Death Illumination Transcendence: A Song of Beirut

     O my brothers and sisters, our universe is not always rational or meaningful from our perspective; it is chaotic, absurd, and often hostile. We need meaning and value, but all we have is the meaning and value which we create and impose on our nothingness. The Infinite mocks us, but also beckons and challenges us to become better.

     As I wrote on this day four years ago in my post of August 4 2020; A horror beyond imagining has transpired in Beirut, which lies in ruins. Civilization dispersed throughout the Mediterranean from here thousands of years ago, uniting Europe, Asia, and Africa in a community of humankind which resonates through our consciousness today.

    We seek meaning in the catastrophes and life disruptive events which flesh is heir to, yet as in the disaster in Beirut such causes are often beyond our understanding.

     Herein I refer now to Sura 18 of the Holy Quran, called The Cave, verses 60-82, an allegory wherein Khidr, the Islamic Trickster figure who is an immortal and is symbolized as green as an embodiment of the Garden of Paradise, who acts as a guide of the soul through the puzzles of the labyrinth of life which leads toward it, and who speaks to us through dreams, visions, and signs.

     I consider it a narrative form of Godel’s Theorem; a proof of the necessity of faith and of the existence of the Infinite, of the limits of human knowledge and the Absurdity of the human condition. Such an interpretation aligns with that of   the great scholar and translator Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

     As with the foundational thought experiment of one of Plato’s contemporaries, the Spear of Archytas, which defines the horizon of the known as it is thrown and marks a boundary in landing, which we repeat endlessly in scientific revolutions, the unknown remains as vast as before, conserving ignorance. This is the first principle of epistemology; the Conservation of Ignorance.

     The canonical story recapitulates themes of the Sacrifice of Ibrahim which I would say forms the basis of Islamic faith, and in the streets of Beirut long ago I saw it unfold once again.

    In this story the Green Man instructs Moses by doing three things which are criminal and nonsensical, things which can be understood only through the foreknowledge of prophecy which is not ours. As with justice, foresight does not belong to man, for the universe is nondeterministic, limitless, and our possible futures are always in play.

    The relevant passage is this;  فَأَرَدْنَا أَن يُبْدِلَهُمَا رَبُّهُمَا خَيْرًا مِّنْهُ زَكَاةً وَأَقْرَبَ رُحْمًا, or “So we intended that their Lord should substitute for them a better son than him in purity and nearer to mercy,” a classic changeling substitution. It also represents a point of bifurcation on which possible futures turn.

     I have hope for the future of humankind because of what I witnessed when this primary story was played out before me forty years ago, and because of it I have never despaired.

     Such a gate stands or once stood in Beirut, like Rashomon Gate or a gate to the Infinite and to limitless possibilities of human becoming. It may now be dust and memories, or like Schrodinger’s Cat both exist and not exist at once; this I cannot answer for you.

      But I can speak as the witness of history that something remarkable happened there in its shadow, which like Khidr exchanging the young man for another to prevent a greater evil from occurring in the future, a time travel paradox if ever there was one, struck me with the force of revelation.

     It was an insignificant thing in the scope of the Siege of Beirut, one atrocity among many which was averted by the innate goodness of a single man whose name remains unknown, a tragic hero whom I will never forget, an unwilling conscript in the service of his government like so many others, who said no to authority and to the seduction of evil. The existence of humankind pivots on the balance of such individuals, and they are very few.

    This Israeli soldier refused to commit violations and depravities upon the person of a Palestinian girl, about twelve years old, who had been captured for this purpose by the lieutenant of his platoon, a common loyalty test and initiation. He blushed at the first demand of his officer to the tauntings of his fellows, there in the street before the Gate of Decision we must all face, then became angry in refusal when he realized it was not a joke, that the Occupation was about terror and plunder and not as he had been told. His commanding officer murdered him where he stood with a single shot to the head as the girl escaped.

     I have returned to this spot throughout my life to touch the stones stained with his blood, for I am reminded that we are not beyond redemption, and that so long as we resist unjust authority we are free, and there is hope.

     As written by Bassem Mroue and Lujain Jo in ABC, in an article entitled 3 years after Beirut port blast, intrigue foils an investigation and even the death toll is disputed: attempts to prosecute those responsible are mired in political intrigue, the final death toll remains disputed and many Lebanese have less faith than ever in their disintegrating state institutions; As the country marks the anniversary Friday, relatives of some of those killed are still struggling to get their loved ones recognized as blast victims, reflecting the ongoing chaos since the Aug. 4, 2020 explosion. The blast killed at least 218 people, according to an Associated Press count, wounded more than 6,000, devastated large swaths of Beirut and caused billions of dollars in damages.

     Among those not recognized as a blast victim is a five-month-old boy, Qusai Ramadan, a child of Syrian refugees. His parents say he was killed when the explosion toppled the ceiling and a cupboard in his hospital room, crushing him. They have been unable to get the infant added to the official death list, a move that could have made them eligible for future compensation.

     They accuse the authorities of discriminating against victims who are not Lebanese.

     Meanwhile, the blast anniversary brought renewed calls for an international investigation of those responsible, including top officials who allowed hundreds of tons of highly flammable ammonium nitrate, a material used in fertilizers, to be improperly stored for years at a warehouse in the port.

     Lebanese and international organizations, survivors and families of victims sent an appeal to the U.N. Rights Council, saying that on the third anniversary of the explosion, “we are no closer to justice and accountability for the catastrophe.”

     Hundreds of people marched in the Lebanese capital on Friday to mark the anniversary, with some family members of the victims calling on the international community to help in the investigation.

     Carrying roses and photos of their loved ones, the families led the march and gathered outside Beirut’s port. Victims’ names were read and a moment of silence was held at 6:07 p.m. — the time when the blast occurred.

     The mother of one of the victims called for an international and impartial investigation “within the U.N. framework.”

     “Three years have passed and you have been turning a deaf ear to this request and this hurts a lot,” said Mireille Bazergy Khoury, the mother of Elias Khoury who was killed by the blast. “This crime is not a Lebanese issue. Victims are all of all nationalities. Please taken action.”

     Maan, a Lebanese group advocating for victims and survivors, put the death toll at 236, significantly higher than the government’s count of 191. The authorities stopped counting the dead a month after the blast, even as some of the severely wounded later died.

     Among those listed by the Maan initiative is Qusai, the Syrian infant. He had been undergoing treatment for a severe liver condition and was transferred to a government hospital near the port about a week before the explosion. Hospital staff said the infant needed a liver transplant and was in critical condition.

     On the day of the blast, Qusai’s aunt, Noura Mohammed, was sitting at his bedside while his mother rested at home. The aunt said the staff ordered everyone to evacuate immediately after the explosion, and that she found the infant dead, crushed by fallen debris, when she returned.

     Hospital officials said Qusai died an hour after the explosion, with the death certificate listing cardio respiratory arrest as the cause. The family buried him a day later.

     “We asked them (the authorities) to register my son among the victims of the blast,” his mother, Sarah Jassem Mohammed, said in a recent interview in a small tent in an orchard in the northern Lebanese village of Markabta, where she lives with her husband, two sons and one daughter. “They refused.”

     Lebanon is home to more than 1 million Syrian refugees, who make about 20% of the country’s population. A Lebanese group, the Anti-Racism Movement, said that among those killed in the blast were at least 76 non-Lebanese citizens, including 52 Syrians.

     Meanwhile, many in Lebanon have been losing faith in the domestic investigation and some have started filing cases abroad against companies suspected of bringing in the ammonium nitrate.

     The chemicals had been shipped to Lebanon in 2013. Senior political and security officials knew of their presence and potential danger but did nothing.

     Lebanese and non-Lebanese victims alike have seen justice delayed, with the investigation stalled since December 2021. Lebanon’s powerful and corrupt political class has repeatedly intervened in the work of the judiciary.

     In January, Lebanon’s top prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat ordered the release of all suspects detained in the investigation.

    “The political class have used every tool at their disposal — both legal and extra legal — to undermine, obstruct, and block the domestic investigation into the blast,” said Aya Majzoub, deputy chief for the Mideast and North Africa at the rights group Amnesty International.

     Makhoul Mohammed, 40, a Syrian citizen, was lightly injured in the blast in his Beirut apartment while his daughter Sama, who was 6 at the time, lost her left eye.

     Mohammed, who settled in Canada last year, said he plans to sue those responsible for the explosion in a Canadian court.

     “The (domestic) investigation will not lead to results as long as this political class is running the country,” he said.”

     As written in Al Jazeera, in an article entitled Photos: Hundreds protest as Lebanon marks third anniversary of Beirut blast: Three years on, investigation is virtually at a standstill, leaving survivors still yearning for answers; “Lebanon marked three years since one of history’s biggest non-nuclear explosions rocked Beirut with hundreds of protesters marching alongside victims’ families to demand long-awaited justice.

     Nobody has been held to account for the tragedy as political and legal pressures impede the investigation.

     On August 4, 2020, the massive blast at Beirut’s port destroyed swathes of the Lebanese capital, killing more than 220 people and injuring at least 6,500.

     Authorities said the disaster was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where a vast stockpile of ammonium nitrate fertiliser had been haphazardly stored for years.

     Three years on, the probe is virtually at a standstill, leaving survivors still yearning for answers.

     Protesters, many wearing black and carrying photographs of the victims, marched towards the port shouting slogans including: “We will not forget.”

     “Our pain inspires our persistence to search for the truth,” said protester Tania Daou-Alam, 54, who lost her husband in the explosion.

     Lack of justice “is the biggest example of rampant corruption in Lebanon, and we can no longer bear it”, she said.

     The blast struck during an economic collapse, which the World Bank has called one of the worst in recent history and is widely blamed on a governing elite accused of corruption and mismanagement.

     Some protesters waved a Lebanese flag covered in blood-like red paint while others carried an enormous flag covered in a written pledge to keep fighting for justice.

     “I have the right to know why my fellow Lebanese were killed,” said protester Jad Mattar, 42.

     Since its early days, the investigation into the explosion has faced a slew of political and legal challenges.

     In December 2020, lead investigator Fadi Sawan charged former Prime Minister Hassan Diab and three ex-ministers with negligence.

     But as political pressure mounted, Sawan was removed from the case.

     His successor, Tarek Bitar, unsuccessfully asked lawmakers to lift parliamentary immunity for MPs who were formerly cabinet ministers.

     The interior ministry has refused to execute arrest warrants that the lead investigator has issued.

    In December 2021, Bitar suspended his probe after a barrage of lawsuits, mainly from politicians he summoned on charges of negligence.

     Bitar has refused to step aside but has not set foot inside Beirut’s Justice Palace for months.

     “Work [on the investigation] is ongoing,” a legal expert with knowledge of the case said, requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

     Bitar is determined to keep his promise to deliver justice for victims’ families, the expert added.

     On Thursday, 300 individuals and organisations, including Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International, renewed a call for the United Nations to establish a fact-finding mission – a demand Lebanese officials have repeatedly rejected.

       “If those responsible are not held accountable, it will put the country on a trajectory that allows this kind of crime to be repeated,” HRW’s Lama Fakih told the Agence France-Presse news agency at the protest.

     As written by Tamara Qiblawi in CNN, in an article entitled Beirut’s port blast two years on: An open wound festers as authorities try to close the case; “Clocks stopped when one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history ripped through Beirut. Inside wrecked homes and shops, the force of the shockwaves froze the dials of timepieces, some vintage, others sleek and modern.

     It was 6:07 pm. Thousands of lives were upended and the Lebanese capital — no stranger to disaster — was transformed into a hellscape.

     Much like the broken clocks, the catastrophe appears to have been suspended in time. Thursday marks two years since the port explosion. Yet the city’s hardest hit, eastern neighborhoods still bear the scars of the blast. The relatives of at least 215 people who perished still rally for justice. The judicial investigation into the explosion is moribund. And the port’s hulking wheat silos — which withstood the effects of the blast despite their proximity — have been burning for weeks.

     In the two years since the explosion, Lebanon’s political elite — known colloquially by the pejorative term al-sulta, or “the power” — has evaded justice and tried to sweep the memory under the proverbial rug. For activists, especially relatives of the deceased, it was painfully reminiscent of the way in which the country’s civil war ended in 1990.

     Then, an amnesty law absolved Lebanon’s warring parties of apparent crimes against humanity and war crimes, including massacres, rapes, extrajudicial executions and mass displacement. Accounts of the 15-year conflict are nowhere to be found in the country’s official history books. An entire population was instructed to move on.

     The authorities’ playbook has been similar in its response to the 2020 port blast, which remains the single most deadly explosion in Lebanon’s modern history, causing material and physical casualties as far as 12 kilometers (7.5 miles) away.

     In the intervening years, the government has repeatedly blocked a judicial probe that charged several officials with criminal neglect over the improper storage of up to 2,700 tons of explosive ammonium nitrate, the ignition of which led to the devastating blast. Some of those who were charged were re-elected to parliament this year.

     Earlier this year, the government also rolled out plans to demolish the damaged silos, drawing the ire of the victims’ families, who regard them as a memorial to the disaster. The government bowed to popular pressure and the plan was dropped.

     But weeks later, the structure began to burn, arousing the suspicion of activists and relatives of the deceased. They accused the government of making half-hearted attempts to put out the fires — a charge it denies. When two of the silos finally collapsed over the weekend, activists seethed.

     “For weeks you let the silos slowly burn and took no serious action to stop the fire,” activist Lucien Bourjeily tweeted, apparently addressing the political establishment. “The collapse (of the silos) today resembles the collapse of the state which is slowly falling apart, with no serious action to stop this nor hold those responsible accountable.”

     Beirut’s wheat silos are many things at once. They stand as a towering tombstone to a bygone era. The smoldering structure also seems to fester like the open wound of the city’s collective memory. And importantly to relatives of the victims, it marks the scene of a crime, a looming mass that serves as a reminder of the quest for accountability.

     Since the explosion, Lebanon’s financial tailspin, which began in October 2019, has continued. The country is in the throes of a bread crisis, in part because of the fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but also due to Lebanon’s infrastructural and financial decay. Its economic woes — inflation, ballooning unemployment, mass poverty — continue unabated.

     But for many, the successive crises have not overshadowed the memories of the Beirut port blast: the shattered glass that crunched underfoot for weeks afterward; the scenes of overflowing hospital wards; those who perished and those who barely survived. For those seeking justice, the events of 6:07 pm on August 4, 2020 must continue to reverberate until the people responsible are held to account.”

     As written by Jamie Prentis in The National, in an article entitled Lebanon marks second anniversary of deadly Beirut port blast; ”Lebanon on Thursday marks two years since the explosion at Beirut’s port that killed more than 215 people, injured thousands and destroyed large parts of the capital.

     Families of the victims plan to hold marches in Beirut on Thursday afternoon, as they continue their search for justice, with protests also expected in cities in the US, Europe and elsewhere.

     The August 4 explosion occurred after a huge stock of ammonium nitrate, inexplicably left in storage at the port for years, caught fire.

     So far, no senior officials have been held accountable over the blast and a judicial investigation has been stalled for eight months. There has been widespread political interference in the probe and two sitting MPs charged in connection with the investigation have refused to attend hearings.

      Speaking on the morning of the anniversary, Lebanon’s top Christian cleric Bechara Boutros Al Rai hit out at the government’s handling of the probes. He said it had “no right” to impede the investigations and that “God condemns those officials” who did so.

     UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said there had been “two years without justice”.

     “In the name of the dead, among them the son of a UN staff member, I reiterate my call for an impartial, thorough and transparent investigation into the explosion,” he said.

     Two-year-old Isaac, the son of UN staffer Sarah Copland, was the youngest person to die in the explosion.

     Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Legal Action Worldwide and other NGOs on Wednesday called on the UN to send a fact-finding mission.

     “It is now, more than ever, clear that the domestic investigation cannot deliver justice,” they said.

    On the eve of the second anniversary of the deadly blast, Pope Francis said the truth over what happened “can never be hidden”.

     The 2020 explosion has been blamed on mismanagement and corruption, and is viewed as a symptom of the country’s many systemic problems.

Compounding the trauma for survivors and relatives of victims is a fire which has blazed for weeks at the port’s grain silos, which were heavily damaged in the blast.

     A section of the silos collapsed on Sunday, and there have been warnings that another will fall soon — possibly on Thursday.

     The fate of the silos, which shielded parts of Beirut from the blast, remains a deeply sensitive topic. In April, Lebanon’s Cabinet approved their demolition after a survey found they could collapse in the coming months.

     But many Lebanese, including families of some of the blast victims, want the silos to remain as a memorial. Some believe the government is using the fire as a pretext to allow the demolition of the silos.

     Meanwhile, Lebanon is in the grip of a devastating economic crisis which first became apparent in 2019 and has been described by the World Bank as one of the worst in modern history.”

     And in another article in The Nation, Jamie Prentis and Nada Homsi write; ” At least two more silos damaged in the Beirut port blast collapsed on Thursday, as Lebanon marked two years since the massive explosion that killed more than 200 people, injured thousands and destroyed large parts of the capital.

     The collapse happened as people were gathering at the site to mark the blast anniversary. Families of the victims held marches in Beirut on Thursday afternoon as they continue their search for justice, with protests also planned in the US, Europe and elsewhere.

     A few hundred people began their march at the Qasr El Adel in Adlieh, holding photos of the victims as well as placards with slogans such as, “You will not kill us twice” and “Lebanon is hostage to a criminal regime”. The number of marchers had grown to about 2,000 by the time they reached the port.”

     As written by Clement Gibon in Time, in an article entitled The Grieving Families Fighting to Preserve a Crumbling Symbol of the Beirut Blast; “ At Gate 9 of Beirut’s port in mid July, all eyes were on the mammoth, concrete grain silos. There was a blazing fire and plumes of smoke were billowing out of the northern block of silos. Rima Zahed was here at a protest holding a portrait of her brother, Amin, one of the 218 people who were killed in the catastrophic Aug. 4, 2020 explosion at the port, which left the silos a disemboweled shell of their former selves. Zahed feared the additional damage would cause them to collapse—and denounced the Lebanese authorities for not stamping out the blaze.

    “The authorities told us that the fire was extinguished despite the fact that it was growing. They could have stopped it,” Zahed said. Her fears were borne out on July 31, when part of the silos collapsed, kicking up thick dust around the port and, for many Lebanese, reigniting trauma from the 2020 blast just days ahead of the two-year anniversary.

     Beirut’s port silos were first completed in 1970, and before the explosion they stored some 85% of Lebanon’s grain. Jean Touma, a former director of the silos from 1976-2006, says they had long ensured the country’s food security.

    But in April, Lebanon’s cabinet approved the demolition of all of Beirut’s port silos—both the northern and southern ones—located at the site of the 2020 blast. Ever since, the families of the victims of the blast have mobilized to preserve them, and are outraged about Sunday’s partial collapse. Judicial investigations into the explosion, one of the largest non-nuclear ones in history, have been obstructed and stalled by Lebanese authorities for over a year. (An independent report by Human Rights Watch last August found that “multiple Lebanese authorities were, at a minimum, criminally negligent under Lebanese law” over the handling of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate stored at the port since 2014, which caused the blast after the warehouse where the fertilizers were deposited in caught on fire.)

     On July 4, the same day the fire erupted, civil society groups alongside families of the victims launched a solidarity campaign called “The Silent Witness.” The goal still remains to protect the silos—at least now what’s left of them—that are located less than 300 feet from the epicenter of the 2020 explosion, and which absorbed much of the blast’s force thanks to the dense grain that had been stored within them. For Mariana Fodoulian, who lost her 29-year-old sister in the blast, both the collapse and the government’s drive to demolish all of the silos is part of the country’s endemic culture of impunity. 

    “How could they let the [northern block of silos] collapse just before Aug. 4?” Fodoulian says. If no silos are left standing in the end, “when future generations grow up, no one can tell them what happened.”

      A history of amnesia

     A culture of impunity has plagued Lebanon since the 1975-1990 civil war—which left at least 120,000 people dead and pushed some 1 million people, more than one-third of the population at the time, to leave the country. The adoption of an amnesty law in 1991 protected those accused of war crimes and allowed them to remain key players in Lebanon’s fractured political scene. No less than 17,000 people are still missing from the war, affecting thousands of families who are still waiting for answers about their fate.

     At the same time, key visual reminders of the war have been erased through the demolition of historic downtown areas that saw some of the conflict’s fiercest fighting. Experts say that firms involved in post-war reconstruction—chiefly Solidere, which was overseen by former Prime Minister Rafic Hariri—contributed to that amnesia. Critics say that Solidere further erased memories of the war by tearing down iconic and historical buildings such as the Rivoli cinema and destroying more homes than even the fighting had.

     Lebanese authorities have been “trying to repeat the same policies of amnesia that followed the civil war with the silos. They do not want people to remember anything related to the crimes they committed,” says Soha Mneimeh, an urban planning researcher at the Beirut Urban Lab and member of the Order of Engineers and Architects of Beirut.

     Families of the victims and activists who have been trying to protect the silos are troubled by the lack of consideration by the government, Mneimeh says. (The government has not launched any public consultations, nor input from the families of the deceased.) The blaze and subsequent collapse has only fueled that anger.

     Following the 2020 blast, the government commissioned several studies to assess the damage to the silos. One of the latest, conducted in March by the Swiss firm Ammann Engineering, noted that the northern block would not stand for more than a decade and could collapse within months. The assessment concluded that the southern block, however, was stable and “demolition is not a priority compared to other challenges in Beirut port.”

     Mneimeh says the northern block of silos could have been safely reinforced and preserved—a view that was supported by some of the studies. For her, these studies make clear that the decision in April to demolish all of the silos, including the stable southern ones, was ultimately a political one.

     Indeed, the government’s plan to rebuild the silos at a new location is an apparent recognition that the blast site could not be easily repurposed for other uses. These 48-meter (157-foot) concrete structures were built on land that was reclaimed from the sea and reinforced with piles. The foundations sitting below can no longer withstand large structures, engineers and architects have said.

     A push for remembrance

     In June, the families of the victims filed three lawsuits at Lebanon’s Shura council to overturn the government’s decision to demolish all of the silos. They have also requested a stay of execution until the council considers the suits. For Ghida Frangieh, a lawyer who helped draft one of the lawsuits and is a researcher at the NGO Legal Agenda, continuing ahead with such plans would deny victims their rights.

     “International standards consider preservation of the crime site to be part of compensation for victims, which includes recognition of the victims’ pain and satisfaction,” Frangieh says. Failure to preserve them “would not only affect their mental health, but also their right to be treated with dignity.”

     In addition to legal recourse, the families of the victims have for months tried to register the silos on the UNESCO World Heritage List. These efforts build off Minister of Culture Mohammad Wissam El-Mortada’s decision in March to designate them as heritage buildings.

     “The silos are part of the city,” says Mortada. “They also represent a common memory for all the people who were victims of the explosion.”

     Mortada soon after withdrew his decision to list the silos as a heritage site, citing a lack of resources to secure their protection. But he says he has been working since then to create a public park with an open museum and a memorial site in collaboration with artist Rudy Rahme on the east side of Beirut’s port.

     That there are government plans to rebuild the silos—at a time of soaring wheat prices and global food disruption brought on by the war in Ukraine, not to mention Lebanon’s ongoing economic crisis—at a separate location bolsters the case for preserving what’s left of them, the families say.

      Back at the launch of the “Silent Witness” campaign in early July, by the Emigrant statue opposite the port that acknowledges the millions of Lebanese in the diaspora, Elie Hasrouty, who lost his 59-year-old father who was working at the silos at the time of the explosion, is exasperated by the uphill battle to preserve the silos.

     “Every day that passes, with the stalling of the investigation and the government’s willingness to demolish the silos, is a continuation of the Aug. 4 crime,” Hasrouty says. He says that he is at a “great loss” when TIME checks in with him after the partial collapse. “It is a place that represented our wounds, and our pain. I am very angry with the behavior of the authorities. It has been two years and nothing has been done to preserve the silos, and make it a place of memory.”

Arabic      

4 أغسطس 2021 جنون الموت تجاوز الإضاءة: أنشودة بيروت

     يا إخوتي وأخواتي ، إن كوننا ليس دائمًا عقلانيًا أو ذا مغزى من منظورنا ؛ إنها فوضوية وسخيفة وعدائية في كثير من الأحيان. نحن بحاجة إلى المعنى والقيمة ، ولكن كل ما لدينا هو المعنى والقيمة التي نخلقها ونفرضها على العدم. اللانهائي يسخر منا ، ولكنه أيضًا يلهمنا ويتحدىنا لنصبح أفضل.

     حل رعب يفوق التصوير في بيروت التي أصبحت مهدمة. انتشرت الحضارة في جميع أنحاء البحر الأبيض المتوسط من هنا منذ آلاف السنين ، ووحدت أوروبا وآسيا وأفريقيا في مجتمع البشرية الذي يتردد صداه من خلال وعينا اليوم.

    نحن نبحث عن معنى في الكوارث والأحداث المربكة للحياة التي يرثها الجسد ، ولكن كما في كارثة بيروت ، غالبًا ما تكون هذه الأسباب خارجة عن فهمنا.

     أشير هنا الآن إلى سورة 18 من القرآن الكريم ، تسمى الكهف ، الآيات 60-82 ، وهي قصة رمزية فيها الخضر ، الشخصية الإسلامية المخادعة التي هي خالدة وترمز إلى اللون الأخضر لتجسيد جنة الجنة ، التي تعمل كدليل للنفس عبر ألغاز متاهة الحياة التي تقود إليها ، والتي تخاطبنا من خلال الأحلام والرؤى والعلامات.

     أنا أعتبره شكل سردي لنظرية وديل. دليل على ضرورة الإيمان ووجود اللانهائي لحدود المعرفة الإنسانية وعبثية الحالة الإنسانية. يتوافق هذا التفسير مع تفسير العالم والمترجم العظيم عبد الله يوسف علي.

     كما هو الحال مع تجربة الفكر التأسيسي لأحد معاصري أفلاطون ، الرمح للأرخيتا ، الذي يحدد أفق المعرف باسمه ويلقي بحدود في الهبوط ، والتي نكررها بلا نهاية في الثورات العلمية ، يبقى المجهول واسعًا كما كان من قبل والمحافظة على الجهل. هذا هو المبدأ الأول لنظرية المعرفة. حفظ الجهل.

     تلخص القصة القانونية مواضيع ذبيحة إبراهيم التي أود أن أقول أنها تشكل أساس العقيدة الإسلامية ، وفي شوارع بيروت منذ فترة طويلة رأيتها تتكشف مرة أخرى.

    في هذه القصة ، يرشد الرجل الأخضر موسى من خلال القيام بثلاثة أشياء إجرامية وغير منطقية ، أشياء لا يمكن فهمها إلا من خلال المعرفة المسبقة للنبوة التي ليست لنا. كما هو الحال مع العدالة ، البصيرة لا تخص الإنسان.

    المقطع ذات الصلة هذا ؛ فَأَرَدْنَا أَن يُبْدِلَهُمَا رَبُّهُمَا خَيْرًا مِّنْهُ زَكَاةً وَأَقْرَبَ رُحْمًا ، أو “لذا قصدنا أن يحل ربهم محلهم ابنًا أفضل منه في الطهارة وأقرب إلى الرحمة”. كما أنه يمثل نقطة تشعب تتحول عليها العقود الآجلة المحتملة.

     لدي أمل لمستقبل البشرية بسبب ما شاهدته عندما تم عرض هذه القصة الأولية أمامي قبل ثمانية وثلاثين سنة مضت ، وبسببها لم يأس أبداً.

     مثل هذه البوابة تقف أو كانت في يوم من الأيام في بيروت ، مثل بوابة راشومون أو بوابة اللانهائي والإمكانيات غير المحدودة للإنسان. قد يكون الآن غبارًا وذكريات ، أو مثل قطة شرودنجر ، كلاهما موجود وغير موجود في وقت واحد ؛ هذا لا يمكنني الإجابة عليه.

      لكن يمكنني أن أتكلم كشاهد على التاريخ بأن شيئًا رائعًا حدث هناك في ظلها ، مثل تبادل خضر الشاب بآخر لمنع حدوث شر أكبر في المستقبل ، مفارقة السفر عبر الزمن إذا كان هناك أي شيء ، أدهشني بقوة الوحي.

     لقد كان شيئًا غير ذي أهمية في نطاق حصار بيروت ، وحشية واحدة من بين العديد من الفظائع التي تم تجنبها من خلال الخير الفطري لرجل واحد لا يزال اسمه غير معروف ، بطل مأساوي لن أنساه أبدًا ، مجند غير راغب في خدمة حكومته مثل كثيرين آخرين ، الذين قالوا لا للسلطة ولإغواء الشر. إن وجود البشرية محوري في توازن هؤلاء الأفراد ، وهم قليلون جدًا.

    رفض هذا الجندي الإسرائيلي ارتكاب انتهاكات وحروق على فتاة فلسطينية تبلغ من العمر اثني عشر عامًا ، تم أسرها لهذا الغرض من قبل ملازم فصيلته ، وهو اختبار ولاء مشترك. خجل عند أول طلب من ضابطه لسخرية زملائه ، هناك في الشارع قبل بوابة القرار الذي يجب أن نواجهه جميعًا ، ثم غضب في الرفض عندما أدرك أنه ليس مزحة ، أن الاحتلال كان عن الإرهاب ونهب وليس كما قيل له. قتله ضابط قيادته حيث وقف برصاصة واحدة في الرأس أثناء هروب الفتاة.

     لقد عدت إلى هذا المكان طوال حياتي لألمس الأحجار الملطخة بدمه ، لأنني أتذكر أننا لسنا خارج حدود الخلاص ، وطالما أننا نقاوم السلطة الظالمة فنحن أحرار ، وهناك أمل.

A Map of My Beirut, what remains of it and the ghosts of what it was

Here a great nothingness has swallowed the voices of the past

Yet they live within us, songs of ourselves and the limitless possibilities of becoming human

 How can we answer the terror of our nothingness

The flaws of our humanity

And the brokenness of the world?

Here among the ruins of a lost grandeur

Fallen empires and the ghosts and legacies of

Beautiful and terrible histories

I wail in grief, I roar defiance, I demand justice

But my words are devoured by silences

I swear vengeance for a lost history and a ruined city

Without an enemy to bring a reckoning to

For this hammer blow of fate was the act of no saboteur

But only a consequence of our common greed and responsibility shifting

And the labyrinthine bureaucracy that misfiled records

Of a derelict ship full of fertilizer quietly degrading in harbor for years

How many such forgotten existential threats

Now lie waiting to seize and shake us?

Here was once a gate to the Infinite and a shrine of the Impossible

In bloodstains which offered hope and redemption

Where now not a stone stands upon a stone

And the light of Beirut become

Vast and fathomless chasms of darkness

Arabic

خارطة بيروت بلدي وما تبقى منها وأشباح ما كانت عليه

هنا ابتلع العدم العظيم أصوات الماضي

ومع ذلك ، فهم يعيشون في داخلنا ، أغاني من أنفسنا وإمكانيات لا حدود لها في أن نصبح بشرًا

  كيف يمكننا الرد على رعب العدم لدينا

عيوب إنسانيتنا

وانكسار الدنيا؟

هنا بين أنقاض العظمة المفقودة الإمبراطوريات الساقطة وأشباح وموروثات

تواريخ جميلة ورهيبة

أبوح حزنًا ، وأصرخ متحديًا ، وأطالب بالعدالة

لكن الصمت يلتهم كلامي

أقسم بالانتقام لتاريخ ضائع ومدينة مدمرة

بدون عدو لجلب الحساب إليه

لأن ضربة القدر هذه كانت فعلاً غير مخرب

ولكن فقط نتيجة لتغير جشعنا المشترك ومسؤوليتنا

والبيروقراطية المتاهة التي أخطأت في ضبط السجلات

من سفينة مهجورة مليئة بالأسمدة تتحلل بهدوء في الميناء لسنوات

كم عدد هذه التهديدات الوجودية المنسية

الآن تكمن في انتظار الاستيلاء علينا وهزنا؟

هنا كانت ذات مرة بوابة إلى اللانهائي وضريح المستحيل

في بقع الدماء التي أعطت الأمل والفداء

حيث لا يوجد الآن حجر يقف على حجر

ويصبح نور بيروت

منوعات الظلام الشاسعة التي لا يسبر غورها

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8829821,35.4963575,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m3!11m2!2sbRiRoVhVlnnOfGcTK7nCKErQ2ojuwQ!3e3

3 years after Beirut port blast, intrigue foils an investigation and even the death toll is disputed

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/3rd-anniversary-beirut-port-blast-probe-blocked-intrigue-102008454

Photos: Hundreds protest as Lebanon marks third anniversary of Beirut blast

https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/8/4/photos-hundreds-protest-as-lebanon-marks-third-anniversary-of-beirut-blast

Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite, by Rudy Rucker

Rashomon Effects: Kurosawa, Rashomon and Their Legacies

by Blair Davis (Editor), Robert Anderson (Editor), Jan Walls (Editor)

In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality, by John Gribbin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/513367.In_Search_of_Schr_dinger_s_Cat

Khidr in Sufi Poetry: A Selection, by Paul Smith

Where the Two Seas Meet: Al-Khidr and Moses—The Qur’anic Story of al-Khidr and Moses in Sufi Commentaries as a Model for Spiritual Guidance, by Hugh Talat Halman

          Lebanon, a reading list

Beirut, Samir Kassir

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7966167-beirut?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_12

Lebanon: A History, 600 – 2011, William W. Harris

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13687123-lebanon?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_50

Memory for Forgetfulness: August Beirut 1982, Mahmoud Darwish

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/142583.Memory_for_Forgetfulness?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_62

 Concerto al-Quds, Adonis, Khaled Mattawa (Translation)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34746502-concerto-al-quds?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_21

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/03/middleeast/lebanon-silos-beirut-blast-anniversary-mime-intl/index.html

https://www.msn.com/en-ae/news/middleeast/lebanon-marks-second-anniversary-of-deadly-beirut-port-blast/ar-AA10ifDi

https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/lebanon/2022/08/04/lebanon-marks-second-anniversary-of-deadly-beirut-port-blast/

https://time.com/6202125/beirut-explosion-anniversary/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/04/a-year-on-from-beruit-explosion-scars-and-questions-remain

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/03/opinions/beirut-explosion-one-year-anniversary-bazzi/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/03/middleeast/beirut-blast-anniversary-grief-anger-wedeman-intl-cmd/index.html

August 3 2024 Say Their Names: Anniversary of the El Paso Massacre

On this day five years ago, the sixth deadliest incident in our documented history of racist violence was perpetrated against the people of America; the El Paso Massacre. I use the qualifier “documented” because most racial violence in America has gone unrecorded and forgotten, save for the obscene post cards of lynchings widely traded in times past among Confederate sympathizers. The pervasive and ongoing ethnic cleansing and indirect enslavement of Latino persons as migrant labor has in the main gone unheralded and unlamented.

     It is difficult and uncomfortable to awaken to the fact that we white Americans are the beneficiaries of slave labor, yet this is precisely true. Our economy runs on the relative wealth disparity of invisible and exploitable persons; how else may one characterize such relationships other than as slavery? 

     The mass murders of Latinos by white supremacist terrorists are a consequence and side effect of a massive and endemic relationship of unequal power; whole sectors of our economy, agriculture, hospitality, child and elder care, food service, and more rely on cheap and unregulated labor. For true parallels to America’s economic system one must look to the migrant African labor in Italy’s agricultural camps; people with no legal existence who may be buried where they die in secret graves, worked without benefits, social security, medical insurance, nothing but their wages which are below the legal minimum. There are no OSHA or other laws which pertain to them, for Latino migrant laborers have no existence on paper.

     Migrant labor is slave labor.

      Our hegemonic elites, a phrase I gladly appropriate from Antonio Gramsci and Marx, do not actually want to enact genocide, sacrifice a vast pool of quasi slave labor, or to exclude the masses of migrants and refugees at our border; that is incidental and to some degree our concentration camps and abduction and deportation forces, ICE and the Border Patrol, are a Potemkin village display for political advantage; what the plutocrats and oligarchs who own America want differs from the fear-driven motives of the racists and white supremacist terrorists who are their deniable assets and form the voting base of their Republican political managerial class; to maintain the illegality and invisible, exploitable nature of migrant labor.

     And there is only one cure for this racist program of enslavement and capitalist exploitation; grant citizenship by declaration to all who so claim membership in our society as co-owners of our government in a free society of equals.

     If you’re crazy enough to want to be one of us, who are we to say no?

     As I wrote in my post of July 24 2022, In a Free Society of Equals. Who Confers Citizenship? Abolish Borders and Enact Citizenship By Declaration; Along our border with Mexico, concentration camps for nonwhite refugees instead of sanctuary, and a brutal army of slavecatchers and overseers of prison bond labor instead of humanitarian aid and safe conduct.

    We will not begin to become human until we build bridges, not walls.

    Let us enact diversity and inclusion rather than divisions of exclusionary otherness and hierarchies of belonging and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege.

     Let us abolish borders and enact citizenship by declaration.

    America has drawn a line in the sand to weaponize economic disparity in service to imperial dominion through labor exploitation of peoples with no legal status, for profit requires slavery as an invisible caste with whom one may do anything at all with impunity as if they do not exist. Here in our border with Mexico, its walls and cages, and in the omnipresent bodies of those who pick and serve our food, clean our living spaces, care for our children and elders, like the black clad stage handlers of a kabuki theatre of capitalism, or the Black Gang who stoke the engines of our system with the fuel of their lives as in Eugene O’Neil’s play The Hairy Ape, we find an immediate example of our own complicity in the dehumanization and commodification of those whose labor creates our wealth and services our elite privilege.

     For we have made of our world a global prison and slave labor system, an imperial dominion of borders and carceral states of force and control, and of our fellow human beings the parts of a vast machine of wealth and power through theft of public resources.

     We are all Nikolai Gogol’s hero in Diary of a Madman, caught in the wheels of a great machine he services, like Charlie Chaplin in his film Modern Times. But we know that we are trapped and enslaved, and we know how and why; we know the secrets of our condition which our masters would keep silent, and in refusing to be silent we can free ourselves and our fellows. This Michel Foucault called truth telling; a poetic vision of reimagination and sacred calling to pursue the truth which bears transformative power.

     So here I offer all of you words of hope for moments of despair, the horror of meaninglessness, the grief of loss, and the guilt of survivorship.

     Your voice has defied our nothingness, and resounds throughout the chasms of a hostile and dehumanizing world; gathering force and transformative power as it finds a thousand echoes, and begins to awaken refusal to submit to authority and to heal the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.

    The voice of even one human being who bears a wound of humanity which opens him to the pain of others and who places his life in the balance with those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, who in resistance to tyranny and terror, force and control, becomes unconquered and free, such a voice of liberation is unstoppable as the tides, an agent of reimagination and transformation which seizes the gates of our prisons and frees the limitless possibilities of becoming human.

    Despair not and be joyful, for we who are Living Autonomous Zones help others break the chains of their enslavement simply by condition of being as well as action; for we violate norms, transgress boundaries of the Forbidden, expose the lies and illusions of authority, and render the forces of repression powerless to compel obedience.

      This is the primary revolutionary struggle which precedes and underlies all else; the seizure of ownership of ourselves from those who would enslave us.

       In this all who resist subjugation by authority are alike as Living Autonomous Zones, bearing seeds of change; we can say with the figure of Loki; “I am burdened with glorious purpose.” 

     Such is the hope of humankind.      

     As I wrote in my post of March 16 2020, Walls of Hate, Tyranny, and Empire: America’s Global Borders; As we are inundated with the global awakening to fear of the coronavirus pandemic, it becomes clear that this is a natural triggering stressor which parallels a manufactured one, that of borders and refugee crises, in its behaviors and effects in our social and political environment as leverage for nationalist and fascist tyrannies of force and control in the subversion of democracy and the transformation of our world into a vast prison.

    Overwhelming and generalized fear is a necessary precondition of authoritarian regimes, and of violence and the use of social force generally, which together with submission to authority may be regarded as a First Cause of the disease of power in the sense that Thomas Aquinas argued causality and being; ” If there is no first cause, then the universe is like a great chain with many links; each link is held up by the link above it, but the whole chain is held up by nothing.”

     Authority and fear also alienate us from ourselves, dehumanize and commodify us as does capitalism as its outer form; for this is about the theft of our identity and power by those who would enslave us.

      The first consequence of the emergence of authority and the disempowerment of its subjects is the modern pathology of disconnectedness; and this is the link which binds authority and tyranny together, and its weak point. Here is where resistance and revolution must act to shatter the knot of interdependent and mutually reinforcing systems which rob us of our humanity and our freedom.

     We must build bridges not walls, togetherness not isolation, unity not division, and forge a borderless world and a free society of equals.

     Todd Miller describes America’s empire of borders in a Jacobin interview; “Since coming into office, the Trump administration has launched unrelenting racist attacks on immigrants and refugees. He seems determined to build his wall by any means necessary and has unleashed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to conduct raids, arrest people, throw them in concentration camps, and deport them.”

    “ But, contrary to widespread liberal illusions, Trump did not start this war on migrants, but only intensified it.

     In fact, as Todd Miller demonstrates in his new book, Empire of Borders, politicians in both major parties have collaborated over the last few decades to construct a massive border regime that polices migrants not only in the United States but throughout the world. In this interview with Jacobin contributor Ashley Smith, Miller discusses the origins and features of this new imperial strategy — and the international resistance against it.

     AS

     One of the points you make throughout your book is that this border regime did not begin with Trump but has been a feature of the United States from its founding. How has the US state internationalized its border regime over the last few decades, and how does it operate today?

     TM

     The US state established its borders through colonization, dispossession, genocide, slavery, and exploitation. This is especially true of its border with Mexico in the nineteenth century.

     That violent process of conquest is too often legitimized by mainstream historians when they use innocuous-sounding phrases like “westward expansion,” dress up imperial bullying like the Gadsden Purchase as “agreements,” and craft self-congratulatory accounts of the Mexican-American War.

     But there is no way to make the white supremacy of “manifest destiny” palatable. The United States seized land, planted its flag, and killed anyone that resisted, especially indigenous peoples, all in the name of God and European civilization.

     It expanded its border regime through its imperial seizure of Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines in the 1898 Spanish-American War. By the early twentieth century, the United States had established its territorial border, set up semicolonies, and policed seemingly independent states in its hemisphere with “gunboat diplomacy.”

     Even knowing this history, it took me a while to understand that the US border extended well beyond its mainland. I think the first time I grasped this was while covering the migration out of Haiti after the devastating earthquake in 2010. I quickly realized that this was not a migration story but a border story.

     Shortly after the earthquake, as hundreds of thousands of people were still in the rubble of their homes, a US jumbo jet flew overhead blasting out an announcement from the Haitian ambassador. He warned in Creole, “If you think you will reach the United States and all the doors will be wide open to you, that’s not at all the case. They will intercept you right in the water and send you back home where you came from.”

     Soon after, sixteen Coast Guard cutters came right up to the Haitian shore to stop the flight of any refugees. Then Washington contracted the private prison company GEO Group for “guard services” (presumably in a tent city in Guantánamo Bay) to in effect jail the victims.

     At once I saw that the US border was: 1) geographically removed from where I normally had thought it was; 2) elastic and able to extend at will very far from the US mainland; and 3) not passive, but aggressive. In a nutshell, the border was much bigger — much, much bigger — than I ever thought it was.

     For example, in 2012, when I was on an investigative trip to Puerto Rico, I learned that the tiny Mona Island — a mere thirty miles from the Dominican shore — was also literally part of the US border.

     So when a sinking boat carrying Haitians to another destination crashed onto the shores of that small island, they were absorbed by the US border: detained, arrested, incarcerated, and eventually deported by the US Department of Homeland Security back to Haiti.

     This is just one instance. Another is the Dominican Border Patrol, which the United States trained and equipped after its creation in 2007. And a third is Guatemala’s new Chorti border patrol, which the US Embassy, one commander told me, helped create to police its Honduran borderlands.

     This wasn’t limited just to the Western Hemisphere. On other trips I found out that US funds created a Kenyan border patrol and a massive surveillance system on the Jordanian-Syrian border. And this is just scratching the surface.

     To understand this, I think it’s important to go back to the 9/11 Commission Report’s paradigm-changing statement: “The American Homeland is the planet.” Since 2003, CBP has created twenty-three embassy attaches from Nairobi to Tokyo to Berlin to Brasilia and is at work in nearly one hundred countries through various border programs — creating, essentially, an empire of borders.

     While the United States has always had such international border operations, it dramatically expanded them after 9/11. When I asked one CBP official at its Washington headquarters to describe with one word how much they’ve grown since then, he answered: “exponentially.”

     AS

     So that’s how the United States controls the global flow of people. How do its policies cause migration to begin with?

     TM

     Washington’s climate, economic, and military policies bear an enormous responsibility for creating the conditions that drive people from their countries. The United States has long been history’s top emitter of greenhouse gases (since 1900 it has emitted nearly seven hundred times more than Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador combined), driving up temperatures, causing desertification, raising sea levels, exacerbating preexisting situations (often of intense poverty, especially in rural areas), effectively making it a force behind displacement.

     While borders have been hardened to deter, arrest, incarcerate, expel, and ultimately sort and classify the world’s most vulnerable people, destructive forces that cause migration can go where they please. One example of this is the “open border” policy in place for the US military.

     With its forces deployed in over eight hundred bases around the world, Washington has conducted countless military interventions and coups, leading people to flee to other countries for safety. For example, in 1954 the United States intervened in Guatemala to overthrow the democratically elected government of Jacobo Arbenz, resulting in a thirty-six-year armed conflict and brutal military repression.

     Another example is Washington-driven neoliberal economics. It has forced indebted countries to privatize state-owned companies, slash their welfare states, and open up their economies to US multinationals. While that made money for local and international capitalists, it wrecked the lives of small farmers and workers, many of whom left their countries for the United States and other advanced capitalist countries to find work as criminalized cheap labor.

     And if countries didn’t agree to neoliberalism, the United States often forced it upon them at gunpoint. If you look in Central America, Mexico, all around the world, this convergence of military and neoliberal policies has both done considerable damage and caused massive displacement of people.

     As the New York Times’s Thomas Friedman wrote so presciently and unselfconsciously in 1999, for the “hidden hand of the market” to work you need the “hidden fist” of the military to back it up and enforce it. And part of that hidden fist is the border regime that polices the migrants and refugees at its borders.

     AS

     This border regime, as you argue in your book, has generated a booming new industry in border security. What does this look like, and how does it intensify the attack on migrants in the United States and throughout the world?

     TM

     The US empire of borders has spawned a whole new dimension of carceral capitalism. It’s raking in enormous profits off the proliferation of walls, surveillance technology, checkpoints, and detention facilities.

     When I was traveling in Israel and Palestine in 2017 with an international group, a man from South Africa told me that what we were seeing was worse than apartheid era in his country. He made the point that in South Africa, while it was bad from 1948 to the early 1990s, there weren’t all the checkpoints, walls, armed agents and soldiers, and technologies that we were seeing in the occupied territories.

     During that trip we went to one of the biggest weapons and technology conferences in Israel. In the Tel Aviv convention center, Israeli companies pitched “proven” technologies, which they boasted had been tested on Palestinians under occupation, to governments from all over the world to police their own borders and oppressed populations.

     At another homeland security expo in Tel Aviv I saw the demonstration of the Orbiter III, which they called the “suicide drone.” The weapons dealer said that it could conduct surveillance on a target, and then, if they so decided, dive-bomb it and utterly destroy it.

     Even though Israel is the “homeland security/surveillance capital” of the world, as scholar Neve Gordon put it, the industry has metastasized throughout the world. I have been to similar border regime bazaars in San Antonio, in Paris, and in Mexico City.

     This whole industry has boomed as states across the globe have built more than seventy border walls (up from fifteen in 1989 after the fall of the Berlin Wall), spent billions on surveillance technologies, and hired hundreds of thousands of armed agents to guard the jagged frontier of the Global North and Global South. Corporations are profiting off border policing, adding crass capitalist interest to crude state repression.

      AS

     What are the domestic impacts of the border regime in the United States? How has it created a new caste division in the working class, deepened racial divisions, and built a state more prepared to repress its population?

     TM

     Border regimes, by their very nature, are systems of exclusion. They are enforced not only by guards but bureaucracies that oversee elaborate rules intended to make noncitizens work hard for their papers as if they were gaining membership to an exclusive club.

     In this sense, the border is much more than the international boundary line. In the United States, the border zone, or jurisdiction, extends a hundred miles inland along the 2,000-mile Mexican border, 4,000-mile Canadian border, and both coasts. That’s a good swath of country where Homeland Security forces operates in what the American Civil Liberties Union has called a “constitution-free zone.”

     Over 200 million people, approximately two-thirds of the US population, live in this zone, where the Border Patrol can set up checkpoints, do roving patrols, work with local and state police, and racially profile and target people for arrest, detention, and deportation. Over the last twenty-five years, the number of agents has ballooned from 4,000 to 21,000, and annual budgets have gone up from $1.5 billion in 1994 to $23 billion in 2018. Detention centers now exceed 250 and can be found throughout the country.

     This massive apparatus is only growing larger and becoming more invasive. For example, the Department of Homeland Security has been testing new small- and medium-sized drones with the ability to “fly unnoticed by human hearing and sight” along a “predetermined route observing and reporting unusual activity and identifying faces and vehicles involved in that activity comparing them to profile pictures and license plate data.”

     All of this amounts to a gargantuan, and profitable, exclusion apparatus, effectively creating a modern caste system that extends throughout the country and indeed the globe.

     AS

     Amid the struggle to close down Trump’s concentration camps, activists are again debating what we should demand. Why should we call for an end to the border regime and open borders?

     TM

     I was just listening to a podcast featuring Vox founder Ezra Klein, who said that he would be open to an argument for open borders if it were shown that it would not destabilize the country. Of course, Klein isn’t the only one with that view, it’s a mainstream one in many ways.

     However, what I think is the exact opposite. Hardened borders exist and are proliferating to police a world precisely because the global situation is already precarious and unstable. As I mentioned before, Washington’s climate, economic, and military policies (and to take it further, those of border-building Western regimes such as the European Union and Australia) have wrecked whole sections of the world.

     When the United States responds to these people by militarizing the border, it only exacerbates the instability. It doesn’t solve the causes of migration but locks them in place; creates chaos at the border, especially for migrants; stimulates corporate investment in the border regime; compromises our civil rights and liberties; and encourages demagogues like Trump to whip up xenophobia and racism.

     I think of the Palestinian artist Khaled Jarrar who, after removing a piece of the US-Mexico border wall near San Diego, said “I will not accept that this wall is in my face.” The whole purpose of Jarrar’s art is not only to dismantle a border apparatus, but also to transform into something more utilitarian.

     For example, he pounded a sledgehammer into the concrete wall that separated west from east Jerusalem, took out chunks of cement, and turned them into sculptures of soccer balls and cleats to give back to the kids whose soccer fields the wall had taken away. I often think of Jarrar’s question: why do we accept that these borders are in our face?

     It is akin to accepting a global caste system, a system of segregation long rejected by civil rights movements and internationally condemned by anti-apartheid movements. The one silver lining in the age of Trump is that his racist attacks on refugees and migrants has produced a new movement to challenge and dismantle the global border regime.’

Empire of Borders: How the US is Exporting its Border Around the World, by Todd Miller

http://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/10/todd-miller-empire-of-borders-immigration-trump

Jacobin Interview

http://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/10/todd-miller-empire-of-borders-immigration-trump

Peter Gabriel’s Games Without Frontiers becomes a song not of the horrors of universalized forever wars, but of liberation from the social use of force by abandoning the hills on which we fly our flags, including the flags of our skins.

Eugene O’Neil’s The Hairy Ape

Charlie Chaplin in The Factory

Diary of a Madman, by Nikolai Gogol

Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia, by Michel Foucault

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/17/politics/gallery/migrants-texas-bridge-us-border/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/02/us/hate-crimes-latinos-el-paso-shooting/index.html

https://time.com/5874088/el-paso-shooting-racism/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/03/el-paso-shooting-texas-one-year-anniversary

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/08/03/el-paso-walmart-shooting-racist-motive-behind-attack/5556903002/

August 2 2024 Anniversary of the Trump Indictment For Insurrection, Treason, Subversion of Democracy, and Conspiracy To Overturn the 2020 Election

We remember this first anniversary of the trial of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump indicted on four counts of attempts to overturn the 2020 election and seize control of the state as a tyrant of the Fourth Reich’s white supremacist terror and theocratic-patriarchal sexual terror.

     This anniversary is shadowed by Trump’s performance of his signature Theatre of Cruelty in an interview with Black journalists, where his contempt for women and nonwhite people and for the ideals, values, and institutions of democracy was on full display, along with his vacuous idiocy, arrogance, trivial bluster, entitlement and delusions of grandeur; but by now I believe we can stipulate the psychopathy of Trump the rapist who would be king.

     But if there is darkness which seethes among us like an annihilating leprous swarm of Christian Identity fascism, there is also light and hope for the Restoration of America; Biden and Harris have brought home our journalists imprisoned in Russia by Trump’s puppetmaster, and the sanctity of journalism as a sacred calling in pursuit of truth has been re-established.

       There can be no greater and more clear and immediate image of the choices we now face in our election and in choosing a vision of a future America; of liberty and tyranny, loyalty and treason, good and evil, Democrat or Republican versions of ourselves.

     Let us act in Solidarity as guarantors of each others freedoms and universal human rights, to forge a free society of equals which upholds our uniqueness in a diverse and inclusive civilization, and elect Kamala Harris as our next President. Let us choose not masters and tyrants to subjugate us, but champions to liberate us.

     As I wrote in my post of August 2 2023, Strike Three For Trump and the Party of Treason; We remain a chiaroscuro of darkness and light; we Americans, we human beings. Such boundaries define us, written in blood; I hope that one day these may also become interfaces.

      As I wrote in my post of February 11 2021, Profiles in Treason and Terror; The dishonorable and the mad, the delusional and the sadistic epicures of brutality and perversions, the feral predators hooting and champing before the gallows and guillotines they have brought to murder members of congress with and their partners in uniform unleashing racist terror and gun violence in the streets, and the amoral and predatory grifters and puppetmasters of fascism who have subjugated and enslaved them and stolen their honor and their souls; these are among the idolators of Traitor Trump who conspired, enabled, and collaborated in his plot to subvert democracy and overthrow America in the January 6 Insurrection which attempted to seize Congress and execute its members, which like Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch on which it was modeled was intended to decapitate the government of the people in a single stroke.

     As details emerge of the internal operations and massive scale of the plot against America, in terms of its central coordination and logistics under direct operational command of Trump and his cabal of conspirators, we are offered not only the spectacle of his aberrance and monstrosity as a mad idiot Clown of Terror drooling and gloating in bestial depravity at the destruction of our values and institutions, the violation of our ideals and the endless suffering he has caused, but of those of his freakish and degenerate followers as well.

      As I wrote in my post of June 13 2023, The Monster Brought to Judgement; Rejoice with me in the spectacle of the monster brought to judgement, his numberless crimes and perversions and those of his treasonous and dishonorable minions and collaborators in a loathsome regime of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror as theocratic fascism and tyranny, designed and perpetrated for the purposes of infiltration and subversion of democracy and capture of the state, are displayed before the stage of history and the world as defining limits of the human and branded into the soul of America.

     Like the thief’s brand of Milady de Winter in Alexandre Dumas’ The Three Musketeers, may the actions of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, forever remind us who the enemies of Liberty truly are, regardless of the masks they wear and the web of lies in which they seek to trap us as the raw material of their power.

    Saboteurs of our justice system and agents of the Fourth Reich have conspired to deny us a public viewing of the trial, a trial whose functions are not limited to the espionage of one Russian agent and ex President, but include the restoration of the legitimacy of the justice system, of America as both state and idea, and of democracy globally.

    We must see the monster disempowered to harm us, exposed and cast out, if we are to find catharsis in this morality play, for Trump is a figure of the diseased heart of America as a Sin Eater for all of his followers and those who voted for him and his policies of division and theft of the soul. We must purge our destroyers from among us; most especially those who once believed his lies and enabled him as voters and co-conspirators including the whole of the Republican Party must now be granted the chance to disavow him and free themselves of their subjugation to theocratic fascism, or be judged with him by history.

     This process of catharsis and the Restoration of America is by now two and a half years along since the January 6 Insurrection marked the high tide and collapse of fascism in America, progress we can measure by the few supporters who came to the trial in response to Trump’s dogwhistled orders to storm the court as a demonstration of power, as compared to the masses who perpetrated the storming of Congress in the Insurrection. Trump is still proclaiming madness and issuing terroristic commands, but almost no one is listening anymore.

     The tide of fascist tyranny and terror in America has turned, and now is the time to bring a Reckoning for its evils.

     For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.

     As I wrote in my post of March 30 2023 ,Victory For America and Democracy: the Indictment of Traitor Trump; Jubilation and dancing in the streets erupts across America as the most dangerous foreign agent to ever attack our nation in the capture of the state with the Stolen Election of 2016 is indicted for illegal hush money payoffs to a prostitute; not yet for his trafficking of the stolen migrant children, the political assassination of our Antifa comrade Michael Reinoehl, the abduction and torture of Black Lives Matter protestors by Homeland Security’s army of occupation, his six coup attempts ending with the January 6 Insurrection, or treason in the subversion of democracy, but such a Reckoning will come.

     This is the first step of Trump’s descent into hell, where he will join his buddy Epstein and his idol Hitler.

      I will remember always the moment when I realized Trump is actually an enemy agent and not merely a vile buffoon; watching as he took his Oath of Office swearing to uphold the Constitution and defend America from all enemies foreign and domestic, while Russian bombs fell on the American servicemen he had abandoned to their deaths in Syria.

      Of Trump’s regime and the Fourth Reich we may say as Mark Twain did of the French Revolution and the epochal system of unequal power as monarchy which it overthrew; “THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.”

      How shall future histories of the American Fourth Reich and the tyranny and terror of Traitor Trump’s Russian puppet regime remember and characterize him as its figurehead?

     As I wrote in my post of June 29 2020, Traitor Trump, Bad Monkey William Barr, and the Subversion of the Rule of Law; Bad Monkey Barr gibbers and champs in his cage, rattling the bars and hurling scoops of his poo at the visitors. Trump the Incorrigible Brat makes faces and taunts him, spurring him on to displays of vicious foulness and depravity, alike in their embrace of the power to hurt others and thereby elevate themselves in vainglorious drooling dominance through fear.

    Trump the Clown of Terror and his pet beast of pain and despair William Barr; carnival sideshow freaks of like nature, Trump upon his golden toilet of self-aggrandizement and Barr scampering at his feet and uttering perversions for treats.

    Stay well back from the cage, children; the President grabs. His every action is calculated to generate helplessness from his victims, his strategies of politics an elaborate ritual of personal superiority through the submission of others which he offers to the demons which possess him, whispering their incantations of violation and depravity in the hollow rottenness beneath his orange painted husk of illusions and lies.

    Such is the true purpose and intention of Trump’s psychopathic game of power as the figurehead of a fascist tyranny of white supremacist terror, misogynistic patriarchy and theocratic Gideonite fundamentalism, and plutocratic disaster capitalism, of authoritarian force and control and the subversion of democracy, in his monstrous acts of treason against our values and institutions of freedom, equality, truth, and justice; the destruction of America and of liberty and the universal human rights we are heir to throughout the world and from the future possibilities of becoming human.

     Trump and his fascist conspirators and enablers want nothing less than to devour our souls and enslave us, beginning with the capture of America as a Theatre of Cruelty and the abandonment of our historic role as a guarantor of democracy and the Rights of Man.

     In the darkness of his warrens beneath the White House, Trump howls and lashes out in rage through his proxies like William Barr, who with somersaults of avarice joins him in a delirium of madness and evil. From his lair and cabal of intimates Trump’s Sith-like influence ripples out through networks of master-disciple relationships to engulf our nation and our world in a vast web of deceit, and this network of secret power must be fought on its own terms with exposure and mass action.

     As I wrote in my post of June 9 2023, We Celebrate the Indictment of Traitor Trump, Russian Spy and Most Effective Enemy Agent Ever to Attack America, For Espionage in the Theft of State Secrets; How do you spell Trump? Treason, Racism, Untruth, Misogyny, Predator.

      Take a moment to savour with me the indictment of Trump for the crime of espionage. Ahhh, the bliss.

      A commentator on MSN’s Eleventh Hour this night pronounced the magic words which I hope will awaken our nation from the long nightmare of capture by the Fourth Reich; “I think Trump is done.”

     It has been a fairytale from which we may learn many kinds of morals, a story which begins in the 1980 capture of the Republican Party by Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority movement as a fundamentalist theocracy and the Presidency of its figurehead Ronald Reagan and the Mayan Genocide they unleashed together, and found its true form in the Presidency of a pedophile rapist and Russian agent who for years slept with a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf on his nightstand in place of a Bible.

      Here in the trial of Traitor Trump is a morality play which is also a Rashomon Gate of our possible futures, for it is more than a legal last stand of the rule of law and the idea of democracy in America against a rigged electoral process which offers capture of the state to its enemies, but also a trial of democracy in America and of our infiltrated and subverted justice system whose court of ultimate appeal is a Supreme Court which is become a whorehouse.    

      What is the meaning of the Trump regime in the story of America and our future possibilities of becoming human as a free society of equals?

       As I wrote in my post of November 5 2020. Trump’s Last Coup Attempt and Subversion of Democracy as His Ship of Fools Sinks in Pathetic Failure;  As Trump’s Ship of Fools comes apart at the seams and sinks beneath the waves in pathetic failure, our Clown of Terror collapses in infantile tantrums and tries to take democracy down with him, a final gesture of madness and idiocy in his delusional quest to subvert our values and institutions of liberty and seize tyrannical power.

     We must never forget how close we came to a repeat of the 1933 German Federal Election that set Hitler on the path to a tyranny of absolute power; this is clearly the most important electoral event in the history of humankind since then, and the two elections are terrifyingly parallel. Trump tried three times to use the Black Lives Matter protests to create fear and legitimize the federal occupation of America under the pretext of re-establishing law and order in an exact duplication of Hitler’s successful strategy using the Reichstag Fire, and failed.

     We have escaped the jaws of the Fourth Reich which have held us fast for four years, since the Stolen Election of 2016, while Trump and his cabal of Gideonite fundamentalist patriarchs, white supremacist terrorists, and plutocratic robber barons have violated everything about America which is noble and true, plundered the public wealth, dehumanized and divided us, sabotaged and subverted the institutions of our freedom, equality, truth, and justice, betrayed our allies and emboldened our foes, lost the American hegemony of global power and privilege and our position as a guarantor of democracy and universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

     Let us never forget the bottomless depravities, treasons, and amoral predation and greed of Trump’s many enablers and conspirators in the Fall of America as we struggle in the years ahead to reclaim our nation and our souls. We must hold them to account, but we must also reimagine our society and the many systemic and structural flaws by which we came to this broken and lost state.

      As I wrote in my post of June 9 2022, The Greatest Show on Earth: Presenting the January 6 Committee; Tonight our puppets will dance upon the stage of history and our imaginations, while a chiaroscuro of light as truth and democracy versus darkness as fascist tyranny and falsification, lies, illusions, rewritten histories, alternate realities, conspiracy theories and propaganda play for the kingdom of our souls and the fate of America and the world.

     Who do we want to become, we humans? A free society of equals or a prison planet of masters and slaves?

     Now begins a great Reckoning, and we shall see.

     As I wrote in my post of February 10 2021, Treason, Tyranny, and Terror on Trial: As the Second Impeachment of Traitor Trump Begins, I Submit Charges Before the People’s Tribunal of Crimes Against Humanity for Which Trump and His Collaborators Should Now Be On Trial; Among the many crimes against humanity for which Traitor Trump and his collaborators should be on trial but are not yet include the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Mexican and other nonwhite migrants, the concentration camps at our border, the orphaning and torture of children, and the state tyranny and terror of fascist and racist violence as national policy perpetrated by the ICE and Border Patrol components of Homeland Security, forces of repression which are antidemocratic by their nature and which should be abolished as a top priority of the Restoration of America.

    Just as villainous and reprehensible is the parallel program of racist police violence and the carceral state to re-enslave Black American citizens and enforce systemic forms of inequality and injustice through state terror, repression of dissent, the force of a militarized police and the counterinsurgency model of policing which has transformed our security services into an army of occupation with primarily political objectives, and the control of pervasive and endemic surveillance and propaganda, lies, illusions, and subversions of the truth.

     Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, and his circus of fools, degenerates, and barbarians, his enablers and collaborators both within the government and his shadow forces rallying under the Confederate flag to bring violence and insurrection to our nations capital and to the streets of our cities throughout America, are co-conspirators and instigators in the murders of every Black American killed by police shooting or other racist violence since its authorization by Trump in the wake of Charlottesville.

      And every missing child kidnapped by the state and disappeared into what abominable slavery or human trafficking designed in the diseased imagination of Trump and his Epstein buddies we know not of, every migrant of the huddled masses yearning to be free who died in the quest to reach the safety of America because the water caches had been intentionally sabotaged by criminals in the uniform of our nation who were “just following orders” like their counterparts in the SS during the Holocaust, every prisoner who died in custody because they were denied water or medical care; the blood of these and countless other victims of Trump’s narcissistic self-aggrandizement and regime of fascist corruption, racism, and patriarchal sexual terror is on the hands of every  Republican who voted for him and fails now in this trial to repudiate him publicly and renounce his works as among those of the devils which he serves.

     For in his actions Trump has been not only a foreign agent and Putin’s puppet whose mission is the subversion of democracy and the Fall of America, but also a slave of Moloch the Seducer, Demon of Lies, in that he is not merely a pathological liar but also an idiot madman who cannot distinguish truth from lies, and who has weaponized his delusions and psychopathy as instruments of our falsification and subjugation in his quest for tyrannical power.

     The bizarre and lurid dark fairytales of the QAnon conspiracy theory movement, like the charges of the Inquisition and the Nazis which othered witches and Jews on which QAnon is constructed, serves as deflection from Trump’s loathsome perversions and sexual terrorism. What terrors did he conceal behind the beauty pageant and modeling syndicate he once controlled?

     His Stop the Steal campaign is a similar deflection which shields him from inquiry into the Stolen Election of 2016 and the fact that his Presidency was entirely illegitimate and due to Russian interference; it was also the rhetorical and organizational basis of his final attempted coup on January 6, for which he is now being impeached for the second time.

     We must cast out the monsters from among us, the racists and white supremacist terrorists, the Gideonite fundamentalists and patriarchs of Christian Identity fascism and sexual terror, and the amoral forces of repression of those who would enslave us and who enforce hegemonies of elite power and privilege and hierarchies of exclusionary otherness armed with guns and badges and the authority of a government which has been infiltrated by the Fourth Reich, an implacable and relentless enemy which has come just short of seizing us in its jaws.

     We must give fascism no second chances.

     As written by Nick Visser in Huffpost, in an article entitled 7 Key Takeaways From Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 Indictment; “ormer President Donald Trump has been indicted over his attempt to remain in power after he lost the 2020 presidential election, yet another moment of reckoning amid a torrent of criminal charges.

     Trump faces four felony charges as part of a sweeping, 45-page indictment filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team of investigators accused the former president of multiple conspiracies to defraud the United States, to obstruct an official proceeding and to deprive people of their right to vote and have that vote counted under the Constitution.

    1. Trump knew his claims were false but spread them anyway to create an “intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger.”

Prosecutors note that Trump, like every American, had the right to speak publicly about the election “and even to claim, falsely,” that there had been “outcome-determinative fraud.”

     But his efforts became unlawful when he moved to defraud the United States and attempt to subvert the process of collecting, counting and certifying the election results. That plan, the indictment says, included a multi-prong approach to spread lies, install slates of fake electors in swing states and convince election officials and then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the will of the people.

     “Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power,” the indictment says.

     2. The indictment identifies six co-conspirators.

Trump was aided in his effort to overturn the 2020 election by six unnamed co-conspirators, the indictment says.

     Five of them are identifiable through details and information provided in the filing documents:

     1. Rudy Giuliani is listed as “an attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies that the Defendant’s 2020 re-election campaign attorneys would not.”

     2. John Eastman is listed as “an attorney who devised and attempted to implement a strategy to leverage the Vice President’s ceremonial role overseeing the certification proceeding to obstruct the certification of the presidential election.”

     3. Sidney Powell is listed as “an attorney whose unfounded claims of election fraud the Defendant privately acknowledged to others sounded ‘crazy.’”

     4. Jeffrey Clark is identified as “a Justice Department official who worked on civil matters and who, with the Defendant, attempted to use the Justice Department to open sham election crime investigations and influence state legislatures with knowingly false claims of election fraud.”

     5. Kenneth Chesebro is listed as “an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.”

     6. The sixth co-conspirator is so far unknown but is identified as “a political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.”

     3. People in Trump’s orbit repeatedly told him there was no evidence of voter fraud.

     The indictment alleges Trump and his co-conspirators made repeated, “prolific” claims of election fraud despite knowing they were false. Prosecutors say that Trump was repeatedly told by his inner circle his claims were untrue but that he “deliberately disregarded the truth.”

     Smith’s team pointed to conversations Trump had with Vice President Mike Pence, senior leaders at the Justice Department, the director of national intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security and many aides, White House attorneys and campaign staffers, all of whom said his claims were unsubstantiated.

     4. Trump acknowledged claims about election fraud and voting machines pushed by a co-conspirator sounded “crazy.”

The indictment notes that even as Trump’s legal advisers were working to undercut election results in Georgia, he knew the claims were unfounded and even described Co-Conspirator 3’s plan as “crazy.”

     That sentiment spread through Trump’s close advisers as the effort to install slates of fake electors in swing states began in force in an effort to obstruct a true count of the Electoral College votes.

     “Here’s the thing the way this has morphed it’s a crazy play so I don’t know who wants to put their name on it,” Trump’s deputy campaign manager at the time texted to other aides. No one agreed to put their name on the plan as they couldn’t “stand by it.”

    5. Trump pressured the Justice Department to support him and threatened to remove those who refused to go along with his plan.

Trump repeatedly tried to get the Department of Justice to support his false claims of election fraud, “thus giving the Defendant’s lies the backing of the federal government.” But the acting attorney general and acting deputy attorney general both refused, saying the agency would not and could not change the outcome of the election.

     “Just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen,” Trump replied, the indictment says.

     The former president then attempted to install Co-Conspirator 4 as acting attorney general to help further the plot. Trump backed down after many in the White House threatened a mass resignation.

      6. Pence’s notes helped the special counsel craft his case.

Trump heavily pressured Pence to support his effort to remain in power and reject the ceremonial certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the election.

Prosecutors pieced together details of Trump’s conversations and thinking around the time using Pence’s “contemporaneous notes” in the days leading up to Jan. 6.

     The vice president rejected Trump’s attempts, telling him to his face that he didn’t believe he had the authority to do what Trump asked.

     Trump later told Pence that he would have to publicly criticize him, the indictment says, which prompted his chief of staff to inform the Secret Service about fears for Pence’s safety.

     7. Trump waited and watched on TV as his supporters stormed the Capitol.

The indictment claims Trump exploited the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and resisted pleas from his aides and supporters to speak out as the insurrection grew.

     “When advisors urged the Defendant to issue a calming message aimed at the rioters, the Defendant refused, instead repeatedly remarking that the people at the Capitol were angry because the election had been stolen,” the document says.”

          As written by Heather Cox Richardson in her newsletter of August 2; “There have been more developments today surrounding yesterday’s indictment of former president Trump for conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding as he tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election and install himself in office over the wishes of the American people.

     Observers today called out the part of the indictment that describes how Trump and Co-Conspirator 4, who appears to be Jeffrey Clark, the man Trump wanted to make attorney general, intended to use the military to quell any protests against Trump’s overturning of the election results. When warned that staying in power would lead to “riots in every major city in the United States,” Co-Conspirator 4 replied, “Well…that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.”

     The Insurrection Act of 1807 permits the president to use the military to enforce domestic laws, invoking martial law. Trump’s allies urged him to do just that to stay in power. Fears that Trump might do such a thing were strong enough that on January 3, 2021, all 10 living former defense secretaries signed a Washington Post op-ed warning that “[e]fforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory.”

     They put their colleagues on notice: “Civilian and military officials who direct or carry out such measures would be accountable, including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic.” Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo recalled today that military leaders told Congress they were reluctant to respond to the violence at the Capitol out of concern about how Trump might use the military under the Insurrection Act.

     Political pollster Tom Bonier wrote: “I understand Trump fatigue, but it feels like the president and his advisors preparing to use the military to quash protests against his planned coup should be bigger news. Especially when that same guy is in the midst of a somewhat credible comeback effort.”

     On The Beat tonight, Ari Melber connected Trump Co-Conspirator John Eastman to Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). Just before midnight on January 6, 2021, after the attack on the U.S. Capitol, Eastman wrote to Pence’s lawyer to beg him to get Pence to adjourn Congress “for 10 days to allow the legislatures to finish their investigations, as well as to allow a full forensic audit of the massive amount of illegal activity that has occurred here.” On the floor of the Senate at about the same time, Cruz, who voted against certification, used very similar language when he called for “a ten-day emergency audit.”

     An email sent by Co-Conspirator 6, the political consultant, matches one sent from Boris Epshteyn to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, suggesting that Epshteyn is Co-Conspirator 6. The Russian-born Epshteyn has been with Trump’s political organization since 2016 and was involved in organizing the slates of false electors in 2020. Along with political consultant Steve Bannon, Epshteyn created a cryptocurrency called “$FJB, which officially stands for “Freedom. Jobs. Business.” but which they marketed to Trump loyalists as “F*ck Joe Biden.” By February 2023, Nikki McCann Ramirez reported in Rolling Stone that the currency had lost 95% of its value.

     Since the indictment became public, Trump loyalists have insisted that the Department of Justice is attacking Trump’s First Amendment rights to free speech. Indeed, if Giuliani’s unhinged appearance on Newsmax last night is any indication, it appears that has been their strategy all along. Aside from the obvious limit that the First Amendment does not cover criminal behavior, the grand jury sidestepped this issue by acknowledging that Trump had a right to lie about his election loss. It indicted him for unlawfully trying to obstruct an official proceeding and to disenfranchise voters.

      Today, Trump’s former attorney general William Barr dismissed the idea that the indictment is an attack on Trump’s First Amendment rights. Barr told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “As the indictment says, they’re not attacking his First Amendment right. He can say whatever he wants. He can even lie. He can even tell people that the election was stolen when he knew better. But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy. All conspiracies involve speech. And all fraud involves speech. Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”

     As written by Ed Pilkington in The Guardian, in an article entitled The 45 pages that skewer Trump’s bid to destroy American democracy; “More than 1,000 people charged over the US Capitol riot, millions of pages of evidence compiled by the House January 6 committee, hundreds of hours of depositions of key players – all this has finally been boiled down to a 45-page indictment that accuses Donald Trump of attempting to destroy American democracy.

     “Why didn’t they do this 2.5 years ago?” the former president asked peevishly on Tuesday, shortly before the indictment came down. The answer lies in the document itself: in its painstaking command of detail and in the cool, crisp legal language deployed by special counsel Jack Smith to make his case.

     This is the third time that Trump has been criminally indicted, and to some extent the shock value has worn off. Much of the content of the grand jury indictment filed in a federal court in Washington DC is familiar.

     But no one can doubt the significance of its contents. For the first time in US history, legal charges have been brought against a president for attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power that until 6 January 2021 had stood as a pillar of American values since a defeated John Adams quietly snuck out of the capital on 4 March 1801.

     It’s taken two and a half years, sure, but Smith wastes no time in getting to the point. The second sentence of the indictment reads: “The defendant lost the 2020 presidential election”, taking us straight to that place where Trump so consequentially refused to go – the acceptance that he was a loser.

     By the fourth sentence, it is clear that Smith has no intention of mincing his words. He rolls out the L-word – “lies” – with an ease which belies the months of angst that the editors of American newspapers went through before they felt comfortable enough to attach it to Trump.

     Later, he accuses the former president of “fraud”, a charged word given the sequence of events. It was precisely that word that Trump used as the foundation stone of his bid to overturn the election – his lie that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud –and now it was being directed back at him.

     Smith portrays the former president as a man who was prepared to tear down everything to stay in office. “Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power.”

     The Trump who emerges from the 45 pages is a frustrated man who, together with his unnamed and as yet uncharged co-conspirators, unleashed a concerted, relentless and fully conscious plan to subvert the 2020 election. Smith dates the plot to 14 November 2020, the day after Trump’s campaign lawyers had conceded defeat in court in Arizona, signalling that he had lost the presidential election.

     That day, Trump turned to “Co-Conspirator 1” – a clear description of his lawyer Rudy Giuliani who is referenced at least 40 times – and who “executed a strategy to use knowing deceit in the targeted states to impair, obstruct and defeat the federal government function”.

     “Knowing deceit” is critical, as it speaks to Trump’s state of mind that is likely to be a key legal battleground if and when the case goes to trial. Smith devotes pages to the subject, repeatedly underlining the allegation that Trump made “knowingly false claims” of fraud in the casting and counting of votes.

     “These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false,” the document reads. It goes on to list the many people and institutions that directly informed Trump that there was no evidence of fraud, from Vice-President Mike Pence down.

     Familiar though they are, some of the details remain just too delicious for Smith – and by extension the Guardian – not to recount. He recalls that during the notorious call between Trump and Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, in which the president asked him to “find” 11,780 votes, the defendant also claimed that 5,000 dead people had voted.

     “The actual number were two,” Raffensperger replied. “Two. Two people that were dead that voted.”

     The indictment largely follows the roadmap set out by the January 6 committee in its relatively elephantine 845-page final report. It traces the story of the fake electors who were convened in key battleground states lost by Trump in an effort to send illegal false electoral certificates to Congress.

     Smith emphasises the extraordinary lengths to which Trump and his co-conspirators went, filing a petition to the US supreme court from Arizona on 11 December 2020 “as a pretext to claim that litigation was pending in the state”. Giuliani was concerned, the indictment alleges using his “Co-Conspirator 1” moniker, that it “could appear treasonous for the AZ electors to vote if there is no pending court proceeding”.

     Sure enough, all 16 fake electors in Michigan have now been charged by the state attorney general, and further criminal counts are expected soon against some of the fake electors in Georgia.

       The lengths to which the conspirators would go is another searing theme running through the indictment. In a previously untold tableau, we see Co-Conspirator 4, clearly identifiable as the former justice department official and Trump loyalist Jeffrey Clark, confronting a White House lawyer who warned him that if Trump refused to leave the presidency there would be “riots in every major city”.

     “That’s why there’s an Insurrection Act,” Clark is alleged to have replied, alluding to the 1807 provision that empowers the US president to deploy the military to suppress civil disorder.

     There are other surprises in the document. In the passage on the pressure applied on Pence in the run-up to his ceremonial counting of the electoral college votes on January 6, Smith nonchalantly drops in a mention that prosecutors have obtained the former vice-president’s contemporaneous notes.

     That’s a revelation that should send a shiver down the spines of Trump’s defence team.

     We learn, too, that on the day of the US Capitol riot, Trump and Giuliani continued to exploit the violence by calling lawmakers to implore them to delay certification of Joe Biden’s victory. Giuliani was badgering US senators even as late as 7.18pm.

     The one argument that is absent here, significantly perhaps, is any suggestion that Trump personally orchestrated the uprising on January 6. It’s a striking omission, given some of the evidence that was heard by the House committee, including the sensational claim that Trump had tried to grab the wheel of his security vehicle and drive towards the Capitol building as the uprising was under way.

     Its absence, though, points to the careful, cautious tone of the indictment, and to its purpose. Unlike the January 6 committee report, the job of this document is not to lay down a record for history.

     Its task is to make a watertight legal case that Trump committed criminal acts that cut to the quick of the American experiment. There’s a lot riding on it: next year’s presidential election, the future of American democracy and that other consideration – a maximum sentence of 55 years in federal prison.”

     As written in The Guardian’s editorial, entitled The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s new indictment: America needs this trial: A healthy body politic cannot allow its core values and principles to be trashed with impunity; “he indictment served on Donald Trump on Monday marks the beginning of a legal reckoning that is desperately required, if American democracy is to properly free itself from his malign, insidious influence. Mr Trump already faces multiple criminal charges relating to the retention of classified national security documents and the payment of hush money to a porn star. But the gravity of the four counts outlined by the special counsel, Jack Smith, is of a different order of magnitude.

     Mr Trump stands accused of conspiring, in office, to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election. Following Joe Biden’s victory, the indictment states, Mr Trump “knowingly” used false claims of electoral fraud in an attempt “to subvert the legitimate election results”. A bipartisan congressional committee report last year came to similar conclusions and provides much of the basis for the charges. But this represents the first major legal attempt to hold Mr Trump accountable for events leading up to and including the storming of the Capitol by a violent mob on 6 January 2021.

     The stakes could hardly be set higher. Democratic elections and the peaceful transfer of power are the cornerstones of the American republic. The testimony given to Congress indicates that Mr Trump used his authority to try to bully federal and state officials into supporting his claims that the election had been “stolen” from him. Repeatedly told that his assertions were baseless, he then mobilised a hostile crowd on 6 January to intimidate lawmakers charged with ratifying Mr Biden’s victory.

     It is inconceivable that Mr Trump should not be made to answer for actions that imperilled the constitutional and democratic functioning of the United States. The prosecutors’ case will hinge on their ability to prove that he knew his claims of a stolen election were bogus. But beyond the trial itself, it would be foolish to underestimate Mr Trump’s ability to turn even this situation to his own political advantage.

     The legal fronts on which Mr Trump is now engaged will drain his financial resources. But a narrative of victimhood and persecution has become, and will remain, the galvanising theme of his campaign. Two previous criminal indictments saw his poll ratings lift, helping him to establish a huge lead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination for 2024. Whatever the evidence to the contrary, a sizable proportion of American voters will continue to back Mr Trump’s self-serving version of reality.

     One of the most dangerously polarising elections in US history thus looms as, over the next 15 months, Mr Trump uses political cunning to evade the legal net that is closing around him. Through his lawyers, he will do all he can to delay matters, hoping eventually to dictate the course of events from the White House. For his part, Mr Smith said on Monday that the justice department will seek “a speedy trial”.

     It is in the interests of American democracy, to which Mr Trump represents a clear and present danger, that the justice department gets its wish. A healthy body politic cannot allow its founding values and core principles to be trashed with apparent impunity. Prosecutors will need to proceed with care and be alert to the complex political dynamics. But this climactic reckoning in court needs to take place before Mr Trump gets the chance to besmirch the country’s highest office all over again.”

     As written by Moira Donegan in The Guardian, in an article entitled Trump’s indictment proves he might not be bright, but he is dangerous: Donald Trump’s frantic, cynical and preposterous attempts to hang on to power after losing the 2020 election were a dark moment in US history; “In the 1976 political drama All the President’s Men, Robert Redford’s Bob Woodward meets the secretive FBI source, Deep Throat, in a parking garage to ask him what he knows about the Watergate break-in. Deep Throat – in real life, the FBI deputy director Mark Felt – is ominous and taciturn, refusing to say all that he knows. “I have to do this my way,” he tells Redford. “You tell me what you know, and I’ll confirm.” But he offers a blunt assessment of the inner workings of the Nixon administration. “Forget the myths that the media has created about the White House,” Deep Throat tells Woodward. “The truth is these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

     Few moments in history, including the Watergate scandal, have done so much to puncture the dignified mystique of American government as Donald Trump’s frantic, cynical and preposterous attempts to hang on to power after losing the 2020 election. The indictment against him related that effort, unsealed on Tuesday by the office of special counsel Jack Smith, charges Trump with engaging in three conspiracies: to defraud the United States in seeking to overturn the election, to obstruct the government in seeking to derail the January 6 proceedings, and perhaps most meaningfully, to deprive American voters of their right to have their votes counted. The charges are serious; the violence was deadly. But every one of the indictment’s 45 pages evokes Deep Throat’s words: these are not very bright guys.

     The document unsealed on Tuesday charges only Trump. But it also implicates six co-conspirators. These include a justice department official, probably the then assistant attorney general Jeff Clark, along with an unidentified political consultant. Also implicated are four Republican lawyers, seemingly including Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani; the law professor John Eastman, who concocted the false theory that the vice-president had the authority to intervene in the electoral vote counting ceremony; Ken Chesebro, an author of the fake electors scheme; and the quack pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell.

     It was with these accomplices that the special counsel alleges that Donald Trump embarked on a series of frauds, fabrications and cockamamie schemes to reverse the election outcome between November 2020 and early January 2021. That project had multiple successive fronts, with the conspirators moving on to new strategies as the previous ones failed. They tried to use the justice department to pursue frivolous and fraudulent allegations of election malfeasance; then they tried to conscript state officials into advancing false claims of election fraud; then they tried to send fake electors to congress; finally, they tried to stop congress from certifying the election results on January 6.

     All the while, they flooded the media with what the indictment calls “knowingly false” claims that the election was stolen, in the hope of creating public distrust in the election outcome and pressure on the officials who they believed could reverse it. None of these schemes were especially well-thought-out, and none would have been plausible without both a willingness by many Republican officials to lie on Trump’s behalf, and a willingness by many Trump supporters to commit violence. But those, sadly, are not in short supply.

     That Trump and his co-conspirators failed in their effort to subvert the election was largely a matter of luck; that they are now being charged in this most significant of Trump’s crimes was not at all guaranteed.

     Much of what is recounted in the indictment is not new. The facts presented by the special counsel hew closely to those laid out by the House January 6 committee in a series of televised hearings last year, and Smith, like that committee, spends a great deal of time eradicating any doubt about Trump’s state of mind or his certainty that his own statements about the election were false. But the indictment does contain new tidbits of information gleaned from the special counsel’s investigation, ones that make both the incompetence and the malice of the conspiracy plain. Copious testimony and contemporaneous notes provided by Mike Pence, for example, make it clear the extent to which Trump’s former vice-president, against whom he incited a murderous mob, is cooperating with the special counsel. Emails obtained by the investigation also add texture to the story of the election subversion effort. One campaign adviser, tasked with encouraging false claims of election fraud in Georgia, wrote in an email that the allegations being advanced by the Trump camp were “conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership”. Not exactly the words of a man convinced of the righteousness of his own cause.

     More disturbingly, the indictment reveals the extent to which Trump and his co-conspirators were conscious of the possibility that their actions might lead to violence, and that violence might be required to achieve their goals. This does not seem to have disturbed them, or even to have prompted much hesitation.

     Pence’s lawyers allegedly told John Eastman that if the vice-president usurped the January 6 certification ceremony as Eastman wanted him to, the result would lead to a “disastrous situation” in which the election would “have to be decided in the streets”. On 3 January, just days before the riot, a member of the White House counsel’s office told Jeff Clark that if the president tried to remain in office as planned, there would be “riots in every major city in the United States”. To which Clark allegedly replied: “Well, that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.” Clark was referring to a law that empowers the sitting president to deploy the military to suppress unrest.

     It has long been clear that far-right extremist militia groups, such as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, planned for violence at the Capitol on January 6; it has been less clear the extent to which the Trump camp communicated with these groups, if at all, about the event and that possibility. It was a connection that has long been speculated about, but which the House committee on January 6 did not firmly make, and the special counsel’s indictment doesn’t, either.

     In December 2020, just weeks before Clark’s conversation, the leader of the Oath Keepers had called on Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. This rhyming thinking doesn’t indicate coordination, but it does suggest a sympathy of mind, and of tactics, between the extremist groups and the Trump camp. It is an affinity that will only become clearer if Trump becomes the Republican nominee again, as he is all but certain to. These are not very bright guys, but they’re still quite dangerous ones.”

     What happens next, as Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, fundraises off his indictment and uses it to centralize power in his domination of the Republican Party for his campaign to recapture the state in our next election, and move us nearer to a civil war?

     As written by Robert Reich in The Guardian, in an article entitled Trump is gearing up for his ‘final battle’. So should we; “Not once has Donald Trump veered from his core campaign theme.

     Recall the first rally of his 2024 election campaign on 25 March in Waco, Texas – exactly 30 years after a deadly siege between law enforcement and the Branch Davidians resulted in the deaths of more than 80 members of that religious cult and four federal agents.

     He opened with a choir of men imprisoned for their role in the January 6 insurrection singing “Justice for All”, intercut with the national anthem and with Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance with his hand on his heart. Behind, on big screens, was footage from the Capitol riot.

     Trump then repeated his bogus claim that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged”. He praised the rioters of January 6. 

     He raged against the prosecutors overseeing multiple investigations into his conduct as “absolute human scum”. He told the crowd that “the thugs and criminals who are corrupting our justice system will be defeated, discredited and totally disgraced.”

     He then declared:

     “Our enemies are desperate to stop us and our opponents have done everything they can to crush our spirit and to break our will. But they failed. They’ve only made us stronger. And 2024 is the final battle, it’s going to be the big one. You put me back in the White House, their reign will be over and America will be a free nation once again.”

     Since then, as indictments have piled up against him and his poll numbers among Republicans have risen, Trump’s “final battle” comes into ever sharper focus: it is a battle against the rule of law and democracy.

     The mega indictment we have all been waiting for – the indictment against Trump for his attempted coup against the United States – will be announced very soon.

     Trump is prepared to use it in his final battle.

     Tuesday, on an Iowa radio show, he warned it would be “very dangerous” if Special Counsel Jack Smith put him in jail, since his supporters have “much more passion than they had in 2020”.

     Unfortunately for the nation, the Republican party is uniting behind Trump’s side of this battle line.

     If not defending the January 6 rioters outright, Republican lawmakers are attacking Special Counsel Jack Smith, the justice department, the Manhattan district attorney, and other current and prospective prosecutors seeking to hold Trump accountable.

     A Trump indictment for attempting the overthrow of the constitutional order and the verdict of the electorate will guarantee that 2024 will be more of a referendum on Trump than a referendum on Biden, as was the 2020 election.

     It will make it harder for Republican candidates across the nation to focus on their fake nemeses – “woke” teachers and corporations, trans youth, LGBTQ+ people, immigrants and “socialism” – and force them instead to defend Trump’s side in the final battle.

     Trump and the Republicans will lose this battle. Even if they win Republican primaries, they will lose the general election.

     Recall that last November, virtually every 2020-election-denying Republican who sought office in a truly contested election went down to defeat.

     Those who care about democracy and the rule of law should welcome the battle, and not just because it will help Biden and the Democrats.

     It will also help clarify what’s at stake for the nation in 2024 and beyond.

     It will show how eager Trump and the Republican party are to abandon democracy and the rule of law in order to gain power. It will show that the vast majority of Americans reject their position.

     Americans hold different views about many things, but most of us oppose authoritarianism. We reject fascism.

     We value the constitution and the Bill of Rights. We are committed to democracy, even with its many flaws. We support the rule of law.

     We want to live in a nation where no one is above the law. We want to be able to sleep at night without worrying that a president might unleash armed lackeys to drag us out of our homes because he considers us to be his enemy.

     The pustule of Trump has been growing since 2016, and the authoritarian impulses underlying this infection have been allowed to fester for decades.

     Folks, it is finally time to lance this boil. It is time to decidedly rescue democracy and the rule of law. It is time to defeat Trump and his enablers who are determined to defy the core values of America.

     Let the battle begin.”

     As I wrote in my post of June 15 2022, Act Three of the Greatest Show on Earth: Where Do We Go From Here?;  Where do we go from here?

      Democracy in America survived its most terrible moment of peril from internal threat in the January 6 Insurrection, yet here we are, witness to the public exposure of the plot and its treasonous conspirators on television as Congress brings a Reckoning to the Fourth Reich.

      Like the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 on which it was modeled, it failed; but in doing so also achieved all of its strategic goals, moving our great enemy nearer to victory by staging a Lost Cause which established the fascist counternarrative as iconography that Trump remains our legitimate President. Next time, and there will always be a next time, we may not be so lucky.

      Not only do the forces of fascism remain an active threat, through open allegiance to the Lost Cause which echoes horrifically with that of the Confederacy and the KKK whose adherents are among the networks of deniable assets now among us as they were at the Capitol on that fateful day, but the vast resources of wealth and power at their command after seventy years of infiltration of global elites and governments remain undiminished.

      But none of this is relevant to the true threat which fascism poses to us all today; for America has been divided against itself, and as we are warned by Abraham Lincoln in 1858 in his House Divided speech in reference to the synoptic Gospels of Luke 11:17, Mark 3:25, and Matthew 12:25; “If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it.

     We are now far into the fifth year, since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery agitation.

Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only, not ceased, but has constantly augmented.

     In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed –

     “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

     I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free.

     I do not expect the Union to be dissolved – I do not expect the house to fall – but I do expect it will cease to be divided.

     It will become all one thing, or all the other.”

      As we are taught with the lyrics of the song Where Do We Go From Here?, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode 7 of season 6, Once More With Feeling, possibly the greatest musical episode of any telenovela yet created;

 “Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

The battle’s done,

And we kinda won.

So we sound our victory cheer.

Where do we go from here.

Why is the path unclear,

When we know home is near.

Understand we’ll go hand in hand,

But we’ll walk alone in fear. (Tell me)

Tell me where do we go from here.

When does the end appear,

When do the trumpets cheer.

The curtains close, on a kiss god knows,

We can tell the end is near…

Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

Where do we go

from here?”

       Here is an elegy for the Fall of America, a hymn to a dying hope and the lost grandeur of a fallen nation. When in a distant future the artifacts of our civilization begin to puzzle whatever beings arise from our carrion, and they ask who were the Americans, I hope such music as this lamentation remains to guide their questions.

     Yet hope remains when all is lost, and whether it becomes a gift or a curse is in our hands. These lyrics speak of the modern pathology of disconnectedness, of the division and fracture of our Solidarity, of subjugation through learned helplessness and the dominion of fear. But this is not the end of the story, nor of ours.

     Once More With Feeling ends not with abjection, but with The Kiss, between the Slayer and Spike, one of the monsters she hunts. A very particular kind of monster, who is also the hero of the story in its entire seven year arc; one who is made monstrous by his condition of being and forces beyond his control, against which he struggles for liberation and to recreate and define himself as he chooses, a monster who reclaims his humanity and his soul. This is why we continue to watch the show twenty years after its debut; we are all Spike, locked in titanic struggle for the ownership of ourselves with authorized identities and systemic evils, a revolution of truths written in our flesh against imposed conditions of struggle and orders of human being, meaning, and value.

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer is an allegory of Sartrean freedom in a world without inherent value or meaning, of the joy of total freedom versus the terror of our nothingness, and above all a song of the redemptive power of love to return to us our true selves.

      This is how we defeat fascist tyranny in the long game, after we bring a Reckoning for its crimes against humanity and its subversion of democracy; let us answer hate with love, division with solidarity, fear with hope, and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

America dances with our addiction to power;

 Liberty and Fascist Tyranny, Hope and Fear,

The terror of freedom and the ecstasy of submission

 Hozier – Take Me to Church, Art-project Inspiration. Choreography and directed by Helga Geller

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season 6 episode 7- Once More, with Feeling – Where Do We Go From Here?

Evan Gershkovich release: Biden and Harris greet Americans freed after prisoner swap

Emotional scenes at Andrews air force base as Evan Gershkovich, Paul Whelan and Alsu Kurmasheva step onto American soil

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/02/biden-harris-greet-us-america-russia-prisoner-exchange?fbclid=IwY2xjawEZ-XRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHW3LYfssyfC6JKPEqrNZ25_cogKaHhGxnWJlfejIdojCp1uTLZp9pO2DkQ_aem_ckI2sr54IioyL-kTprGLpA

US reacts to major prisoner swap with Russia: ‘feat of diplomacy’ and ‘joyous’

White House, WSJ and politicians praise Evan Gershkovich and Paul Whelan’s release in a likely political coup for Biden

Incredulous laughter, audible gasps: Trump’s performance at Black journalists’ panel left him exposed

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/31/trump-nabj-black-journalists-chicago

Black journalists respond to ‘disastrous’ Trump panel at annual convention

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/31/nabj-trump-panel-black-journalists-respond

‘It’s not a theoretical proposition’: the ‘war game’ imagining a coup in the US

Trump 2020 election interference case resumes after immunity decision

7 Key Takeaways From Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 Indictment

The 45 pages that skewer Trump’s bid to destroy American democracy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/02/donald-trump-indictment-pages-jack-smith-january-6-election-2020?CMP=share_btn_link

The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s new indictment: America needs this trial | Editorial

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/02/the-guardian-view-on-donald-trumps-new-indictment-america-needs-this-trial?CMP=share_btn_link

Trump’s indictment proves he might not be bright, but he is dangerous

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/02/trump-indictment-jan-6-election-danger?CMP=share_btn_link

Trump is gearing up for his ‘final battle’. So should we

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/24/donald-trump-2024-election-final-battle

Jack Smith Says Trump’s ‘Lies’ Fueled Attack On The Capito

Mike Pence Says Trump Indictment Shows ‘Our Country Is More Important Than One Man

Letters From An American

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/WhctKKZGZCNggmwdGrWlClzkjVxrtrsxtnXBwljFFtNQNrGfsWKbhRWFrmgQQggkZsWqctq

 Finally, 30 months after leaving office in disgrace, Trump must face the music                    

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/01/trump-republican-support-primaries

August 1 2024 A Legacy of Resistance: Anniversary of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising

      The First of August marks the Anniversary of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising, an object lesson of the horrors of war and the grandeur of Resistance against impossible odds. In a world where the Resistance now combats fascist tyranny in so many arenas and theatres, the Warsaw Uprising remains a song of the glories of antifascist action, revolutionary struggle, and liberation movements, and a cautionary tale of its dangers and points of failure.

     For sixty-three days, nearly a million civilians trapped in the city under Nazi occupation were savaged in this war of survival, a tragic and glorious Resistance doomed by the political implications of an independence movement which was timed to liberate Poland before the advancing Soviet forces with the goal of keeping Poland free rather than trading the Nazi Occupation for a Soviet one, which explains why it failed while the parallel Paris Uprising coordinated with the Allied Liberation succeeded. Had the leaders of the Warsaw Uprising forged an alliance and coordinated with the Soviet tanks on the far side of the river to break the Nazis, and negotiated who was in control of what later, results could have been very different.

     This is one of the great lessons of the Warsaw Uprising; always communicate before taking action. Another is the value of solidarity; who stands alone, dies alone. Most important of all is a lesson I would hope is obvious; win first, settle accounts and divide the spoils later.

     A campaign of disruption, ambush, and sabotage, using the confusion of political mass action as concealment and a unifying narrative, can make mischief behind enemy lines and in cities under occupation, and can be very useful in coordination with an army which can challenge an enemy directly, especially as scouts, but this is not the kind of war the Warsaw Uprising chose to fight. Much like Hamas in the Gaza War, they fought a campaign of total war for control of the city, with the city itself and the lives of all its people in the balance, with horrific consequences.

    Yet they fought, without regard to the cost, in a campaign both absurd and noble, tragic and glorious, a last stand against a nihilistic barbarian modernity of fascist tyranny and terror, doomed and beautiful as was the defense of the Great Siege of Malta, and bearing to the last the only title that matters, that of Invictus.

    Here I reference the great poem Invictus, which means Unconquered in Latin, by William Ernest Henley.

   “Out of the night that covers me,  

  Black as the Pit from pole to pole,  

I thank whatever gods may be  

  For my unconquerable soul.  

In the fell clutch of circumstance

  I have not winced nor cried aloud.  

Under the bludgeonings of chance  

  My head is bloody, but unbowed.  

Beyond this place of wrath and tears  

  Looms but the Horror of the shade,

And yet the menace of the years  

  Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.  

It matters not how strait the gate,  

  How charged with punishments the scroll,  

I am the master of my fate:

  I am the captain of my soul. “

    This was an international campaign waged by volunteers which, as reported by Transnational Resistance, included “several hundred and represented at least 15 countries – Slovakia, Hungary, Great Britain, Australia, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Italy, the United States of America, the Soviet Union, South Africa, Rumania and even Germany and Nigeria.”

    Today it finds echo and reflection in the International Brigades defending Ukraine both as forces integrated into her military and as independent volunteers like myself and my friends of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, and those operating within Russia as allies of the peace movement now pervasive throughout the Russian military and the civilian democracy mass movement, which include the many Polish patriots and Resistance fighters who rallied to the cause of liberty under threat of nuclear annihilation and imperial conquest by Russia in answer to the call for volunteers by myself and the few hundred Defenders of Mariupol who escaped with me as the city was being sealed off for destruction on April 18, a new Polish Resistance founded in the meeting of which I wrote in my post of April 20 2022, What is the Meaning of Mariupol? Address to the Volunteers in Warsaw on April 20 in Warsaw.

     The circumstances of Mariupol, Rafah, and Warsaw in 1944 are comparable; so also with the crimes against humanity of the enemy. Here was the re-enactment of Guernica which established the fascist doctrine of Total War.

      Himmler’s SS retaliated massively in the Wola Massacre, during which two hundred thousand civilians were murdered and Warsaw destroyed by explosives. His orders read; ”The non-fighting part of the population, women, children, shall also be killed. The whole city shall be razed to the ground”.      

     The entire story is told in Norman Davies’ book Rising ’44 The Battle for Warsaw. Admire them as heroes, our antifascist brothers and sisters. but also learn from their mistakes, and avoid allowing the innocent to bear the cost of your nobility of purpose.

     We fight for a humankind united as guarantors of each other’s universal rights and humanity, though we must do so in a world not yet of transcendent and glorious ideals but of ambiguous, ephemeral, and relative truths and values, wherein imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle leave us as few chances for stands on principle which do not threaten risks of ideological fracture as they do for debate and negotiation with those who would enslave us.

     Resistance is always war to the knife.

     As the iconic photo below is described in ExecutedToday; “One legacy was eerily and unknowingly captured by a LIFE magazine photographer in 1948, of a young girl in a school for disturbed children in Poland. Her face a scramble of innocence and madness as it peers into the lens, she illustrates her “home” as an incoherent chalk vortex. It wasn’t known until many years after this photo became emblematic of a generation wracked by horror, but “Tereska” — Teresa Adwentowska — was an orphaned survivor of Wola.”

http://www.executedtoday.com/images/Tereska.jpg

Rising ’44: The Battle for Warsaw, by Norman Davies

https://jacobinmag.com/2021/08/warsaw-uprising-poland-factions-right-nationalism-kaczynski-communists-jews-home-army/?fbclid=IwAR1o1ElzoTA5LG5cFXGyp8xTgwTqoyoYG263QkK8bSiWtoX6SL-qGImwdug

https://jacobinmag.com/2015/11/timothy-snyder-bialoszewski-memoir-warsaw-uprising

https://jacobinmag.com/2020/08/marek-edelman-poland-democracy-solidarnosc

Polish

7 sierpnia 2024 Dziedzictwo oporu: Rocznica Powstania Warszawskiego 1944

      Pierwszego sierpnia przypada rocznica Powstania Warszawskiego 1944, lekcja poglądowa o okropnościach wojny i wielkości ruchu oporu przeciwko niemożliwym przeciwnościom. W świecie, w którym Ruch Oporu walczy teraz z faszystowską tyranią na tak wielu arenach i teatrach, Powstanie Warszawskie pozostaje pieśnią o chwale antyfaszystowskiej akcji, walki rewolucyjnej i ruchów wyzwoleńczych oraz ostrzegawczą opowieścią o jego niebezpieczeństwach i punktach niepowodzenia.

     Przez sześćdziesiąt trzy dni prawie milion cywilów uwięzionych w mieście pod nazistowską okupacją było atakowanych w tej wojnie o przetrwanie, tragicznym i chwalebnym ruchu oporu skazanego na polityczne implikacje ruchu niepodległościowego, który miał wyzwolić Polskę przed nacierającymi siłami sowieckimi mając na celu utrzymanie Polski wolnej, a nie zamianę okupacji nazistowskiej na sowiecką, co wyjaśnia, dlaczego się nie powiodła, podczas gdy równoległe Powstanie Paryskie koordynowane z Wyzwoleniem Aliantów odniosło sukces. Gdyby przywódcy Powstania Warszawskiego zawarli sojusz i skoordynowali się z sowieckimi czołgami po drugiej stronie rzeki, aby rozbić nazistów i negocjować, kto będzie kontrolował, co później, wyniki mogłyby być zupełnie inne.

     To jedna z wielkich lekcji Powstania Warszawskiego; zawsze komunikuj się przed podjęciem działań. Inną jest wartość solidarności; kto stoi samotnie, umiera samotnie. Najważniejsza ze wszystkich jest lekcja, która, mam nadzieję, jest oczywista; najpierw wygrywaj, rozliczaj się, a później rozdzielaj łupy.

     Kampania zakłócania porządku, zasadzki i sabotażu, wykorzystująca zamieszanie politycznej akcji masowej jako ukrycie i jednoczącą narrację, może zrobić krzywdę za liniami wroga i w okupowanych miastach i może być bardzo przydatna w koordynacji z armią, która może rzucić wyzwanie wróg bezpośrednio, zwłaszcza jako harcerze, ale nie na taką wojnę zdecydowało się Powstanie Warszawskie. Toczyli kampanię totalnej wojny o kontrolę nad miastem, z samym miastem i życiem wszystkich jego mieszkańców w równowadze, z przerażającymi konsekwencjami.

    A jednak walczyli, bez względu na koszty, w kampanii zarówno absurdalnej, jak i szlachetnej, tragicznej i chwalebnej, o ostatni bastion przeciwko nihilistycznej barbarzyńskiej nowoczesności faszystowskiej tyranii i terroru, skazanej na zagładę i pięknej, jak obrona Wielkiego Oblężenia Malty, i nosząc do końca jedyny tytuł, który ma znaczenie, tytuł Invictus.

    Odwołuję się tu do wielkiego wiersza Invictus, co po łacinie oznacza Niezwyciężony, autorstwa Williama Ernesta Henleya.

„Z nocy, która mnie okrywa,

  Czarny jak dół od bieguna do bieguna,

Dziękuję jakimkolwiek bogom mogą być

  Za moją niepokonaną duszę.

W upadłym szponach okoliczności

  Nie skrzywiłem się ani nie płakałem na głos.

Pod ciosami przypadku

  Moja głowa jest zakrwawiona, ale nie pochylona.

Poza tym miejscem gniewu i łez

  Krosna, ale horror cienia,

A jednak groźba lat…

  Znajdzie i znajdzie mnie bez lęku.

Nie ma znaczenia, jak cienka brama,

  Jak obciążony karami zwój,

Jestem panem swojego losu:

  Jestem kapitanem mojej duszy. “

    Była to międzynarodowa kampania prowadzona przez wolontariuszy, która, jak donosi Transnational Resistance, obejmowała „kilkaset i reprezentowała co najmniej 15 krajów – Słowację, Węgry, Wielką Brytanię, Australię, Francję, Belgię, Holandię, Grecję, Włochy, Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki, Związku Radzieckiego, RPA, Rumunii, a nawet Niemiec i Nigerii”.

    Dziś odbija się to echem i odbiciem w międzynarodowych brygadach broniących Ukrainy zarówno jako siły zintegrowane z jej wojskiem, jak i jako niezależni ochotnicy, tacy jak ja i moi przyjaciele z Brygady Abrahama Lincolna, oraz jako sojusznicy ruchu pokojowego wszechobecnego w Rosji. masowy ruch wojskowy i cywilnej demokracji, w skład którego wchodzi wielu polskich patriotów i bojowników ruchu oporu, którzy zjednoczyli się na rzecz wolności pod groźbą nuklearnej zagłady i imperialnego podboju przez Rosję w odpowiedzi na apel o wolontariat przeze mnie i kilkuset Obrońców Mariupola który uciekł ze mną, gdy miasto było pieczętowane na zagładę 18 kwietnia, nowy polski ruch oporu założony na spotkaniu, o którym pisałem w poście z 20 kwietnia 2022 r. Jakie jest znaczenie Mariupola? Przemówienie do Wolontariuszy w Warszawie 20 kwietnia w Warszawie.

     Okoliczności Mariupola i Warszawy w 1944 r. są porównywalne; podobnie też ze zbrodniami przeciwko ludzkości wroga.

      SS Himmlera masowo zemściło się w masakrze na Woli, podczas której zamordowano dwieście tysięcy cywilów, a Warszawa zniszczono materiałami wybuchowymi. Jego rozkazy czytały; „Niewalcząca część ludności, kobiety, dzieci też ma zostać zabita. Całe miasto zostanie zrównane z ziemią”.

     Całą historię opowiada książka Normana Daviesa Rising ’44 The Battle for Warsaw. Podziwiaj ich jak bohaterów, naszych antyfaszystowskich braci i siostry. ale także ucz się na ich błędach i unikaj pozwalania niewinnym ponosić koszty twojej szlachetności celu.

     Walczymy o ludzkość zjednoczoną jako gwarancje swoich uniwersalnych praw i człowieczeństwa, chociaż musimy to robić w świecie jeszcze nie transcendentnych i chwalebnych ideałów, ale dwuznacznych, efemerycznych i względnych prawd i wartości, w którym narzucone warunki rewolucyjnej walki pozostawiają nam równie mało szans na stanowisko co do zasad, które nie grozi złamaniem ideologicznym, jak na debatę i negocjacje z tymi, którzy chcą nas zniewolić.

      Opór jest zawsze wojną na nóż.

     Jak opisano poniżej kultowe zdjęcie w ExecutedToday; „Jedna ze spuścizny została sfotografowana w dziwny i nieświadomy sposób przez fotografa magazynu LIFE w 1948 roku, przedstawiająca dziewczynkę ze szkoły dla niespokojnych dzieci w Polsce. Jej twarz to szał niewinności i szaleństwa, gdy spogląda w obiektyw, ilustruje swój „dom” jako niespójny kredowy wir. Nie było wiadomo, aż wiele lat po tym, jak to zdjęcie stało się symbolem pokolenia dręczonego horrorem, ale „Tereska” — Teresa Adwentowska — była osieroconą ocaloną z Woli”.

April 20 2022 What is the Meaning of Mariupol? Address to the Volunteers in Warsaw

   As we gather and prepare to take the fight to the enemy in direct action against the regime of Russia itself, against Vladimir Putin and his oligarchs and elites who sit at the helm of power and are now complicit in war crimes and crimes against humanity both in Ukraine and her province of Crimea in the imperial conquest of a sovereign and independent nation and in Russia in the subjugation of their own citizens, and in the other theatres of this the Third World War, Syria, Libya, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Nagorno-Karabakh, and in the capture of the American state in the Stolen Election of 2016 which put Putin’s treasonous and dishonorable agent and proxy Donald Trump, Our Clown of Terror, in the White House to oversee the infiltration and subversion of democracy by the Fourth Reich, we are confronted with countless horrific examples of the future that awaits us at the hands of Putin’s regime, and we have chosen Resistance as the only alternative to slavery and death.

    As we bring a Reckoning for tyranny, terror, and the horrors of war, in the crimes against humanity by Russia in Ukraine which include executions, torture, organized mass rape and the trafficking of abducted civilians, the capture of civilian hostages and use of forced labor, cannibalism using mobile factories, genocidal attacks, erasure of evidence of war crimes using mobile crematoriums which indicates official planning as part of the campaign of terror and proof that the countless crimes against humanity of this war are not aberrations but by design and at the orders of Putin and his commanders, threats of nuclear annihilation against European nations sending humanitarian aid, and the mass destruction of cities, we are become a court of last appeal in the defense of our universal human rights and of our humanity itself.

     The Russian strategy of conquest opens with sustained and relentless bombardment and destruction of hospitals, bomb shelters, stores of food, power systems, water supply, corridors of humanitarian aid and the evacuation of refugees; anything which could help citizens survive a siege. Once nothing is left standing, a campaign of terror as organized mass rape, torture, cannibalism, and looting begins, and any survivors enslaved or executed. This is a war of genocide and erasure, and to fascism there can be but one reply; Never Again!

    In this war which is now upon us, Putin’s goal is to restore the Russian Empire in the conquest of the Ukraine and the Black Sea as a launchpad for the conquest and dominion of the Mediterranean, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East; but he has a parallel and far more dangerous purpose in the abrogation of international law and our universal human rights. The true purpose of the Fourth Reich and its puppetmaster Vladimir Putin in this war is to make meaningless the idea of human rights.

    This is a war of tyranny and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil against democracy and a free society of equals, for the idea that we all of us have meaning and value which is uniquely ours and against enslavement and the theft of our souls.

     Within the limits of our form, of the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world, we struggle to achieve the human; ours is a revolution of Tikkun Olam, a Hebrew phrase meaning repair of the world which refers to our interdependence and duty of care for each other as equals who share a common humanity. 

     I’m sure all of us here know what Shlomo Bardin meant when he repurposed the phrase from the Kabbalah of Luria and the Midrash, but what do I mean by this?

     There are only two kinds of actions which we human beings are able to perform; those which affirm and exalt us, and those which degrade and dehumanize us.

     We live at a crossroads of history which may define the fate of our civilization and the future possibilities of becoming human, in the struggle between tyranny and liberty and between solidarity and division, and we must each of us choose who we wish to become, we humans; masters and slaves, or a free society of equals?

     As you know, my friends and I come to you from the Siege of Mariupol, a battle of flesh against unanswerable force and horror, of solidarity against division, of love against hate, and of hope against fear.

     Here, as in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising which we celebrated yesterday, the human will to freedom is tested by an enemy who exults in the embrace of the monstrous, whose policies and designs of war as terror gladly and with the open arrogance of power instrumentalize utter destruction and genocide, a war wherein atrocities and depravities are unleashed as tactics of shock and awe with intent of subjugation through learned helplessness and overwhelming and generalized fear.

    In Mariupol now as in Warsaw then, we affirm and renew our humanity in refusal to submit or to abandon our duty of care for each other. The Defenders of Mariupol who have sworn to die together and have refused many demands for surrender make their glorious Last Stand not as a gesture of defiance to a conqueror and tyrant, or to hold the port to slow and impede the Russian campaign in the Donbas now ongoing and prevent the seizure of the whole seaboard and control of the Black Sea, though these are pivotal to the liberation of Ukraine, but to protect the hundreds, possibly thousands, of refugees who now shelter in the tunnels of the underground fortress at the Azovstal and Ilyin Steel and Iron Works, especially the many children in makeshift hospitals who cannot be moved.

     This is the meaning of Mariupol; we stand together and remain human, regardless of the cost. This is what it means to be human, how it is achieved, and why solidarity is important. Among our values, our duty of care for others is paramount, because it is instrumental to everything else, and all else is contingent on this.

    To paraphrase America’s Pledge of Allegiance not as an oath to a nation but as the declaration of a United Humankind; We, the People of Earth, pledge ourselves to each other, as one humankind, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

    This brings us to my purpose in speaking to you today, for one of you has asked a question which is central to our mission of the Liberation of Russia and Ukraine, and to the solidarity of the international community in this our cause; how can ordinary people like ourselves hope for victory over the unanswerable force and overwhelming power of tyranny, terror, and war?

    There are two parallel and interdependent strategies of Resistance in asymmetrical warfare; the first and most important is to redefine the terms of victory. This is because we are mortal, and the limits of our form impose conditions of struggle; we must be like Jacob wrestling the angel, not to conquer this thing of immense power but to escape being conquered by it. We can be killed, imprisoned, tortured; but we cannot be defeated or conquered if we but refuse to submit.

     Power without legitimacy becomes meaningless, and authority crumbles when met with disbelief. This is why journalism and teaching as sacred callings in pursuit of truth are crucial to democracy, and why the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen are Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

   What of the use of police in brutal repression by carceral states? The social use of force is hollow and brittle, and fails at the point of disobedience. When the police are an army of Occupation and the repression of dissent, they can be Resisted on those terms; my point here is simply that victory against unanswerable force consists of refusal to submit.

     Who refuses to submit and cannot be compelled becomes Unconquered and is free. This is a kind of victory which cannot be taken from us.

    Second is our strategy for survival against an enemy who does not regard us as human, and will use terror to enforce submission through learned helplessness. By any means necessary, as this principle is expressed in the famous dictum of Sartre in his 1948 play Dirty Hands, quoted by Frantz Fanon in his 1960 speech Why We Use Violence, and made immortal by Malcolm X.

      In Mariupol I began referring to this in its oldest form, war to the knife. Its meaning for us is simple; those who would enslave us and who abandon all laws and all limits may hide behind none.

     The question to which I speak today in reply intrigued me, because it was nearly identical to a line which sets up one of the greatest fictional military speeches in literature, Miles Vorkosigan’s speech to the Maurilacans in The Borders of Infinity by Lois McMaster Bujold.

     In this story, Miles has just led a mass prisoner of war escape, from a prison which like all fascist tyrannies is fiendishly designed to produce abjection, as described by Julia Kristeva in her famous essay, in circumstances of horror such as those which my friends here and I have just survived, and in which we now find ourselves like the Marilacans having achieved an army, and about to take the fight to the enemy on his own ground. 

     One of the volunteers says, ”The defenders of Mariupol had those crazy Cossack warriors, swearing an oath to die rather than surrender, professional mercenaries from everywhere, all of them elite forces and utterly fearless. We just can’t fight on those terms; its been seventy years since we fought a total war of survival, and most of us here are professionals and university intellectuals. Poland is civilized, maybe too civilized for what’s coming our way.”

     To this I answer with Miles; “Let me tell you about the defenders of Mariupol. Those who sought a glorious death in battle found it early on. This cleared the chain of command of accumulated fools.

    The survivors were those who learned to fight dirty, and live, and fight another day, and win and win and win. And for whom nothing, not comfort nor security, not family nor friends nor their immortal souls, was more important than victory.

     They were not supermen or more than human. They sweated in confusion and darkness.

     And with not one half the resources Poland possesses, Ukraine remains unconquered. When you’re all that stands between liberty and tyranny, freedom and slavery, life and death, between a people and genocide, when you’re human, there is no mustering out.”

    To this wonderful speech of a fictional hero who simply refuses to stay down to the fictional survivors of the very real horror of being held captive and powerless by a tyrant, whether as prisoners of war or citizens of an occupied city, I must add this; how if Poland and Ukraine stand together, with all of Europe and America united in Resistance?

    And if you are telling me you could not today fight a Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, this I do not believe. Nor would you do so alone, for during this Passover as the Jewish community remembers the story of the Exile, the world also remembers; we watch it in our news every day, enacted once again in Ukraine. This, too, is a Haggadah, in which all of humankind can share, and which yet again teaches us the necessity of our interdependence and solidarity.  

     As written by Alan Moore in V For Vendetta; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”  

     Here is a truth to which all of us here today can bear witness.

     But there is a thing which tyrants never learn; the use of force and violence obeys the Third Law of Motion, and creates resistance as its own counterforce. And when the brutality and crimes against humanity of that force and violence are performed upon the stage of the world, visible to all and a history which cannot be erased, part of the story of every human being from now until the end of our species, which no washing of hands may deny as demonstrated  by Shakespeare’s Lady MacBeth, repression finds answer in reckoning as we awaken to our interdependence and the necessity of our solidarity and duty of care for each other.

     And so I offer to all of you the Oath of the Resistance as it was given to me by the great Jean Genet on that fateful day in 1982, in a burning house, in a lost cause, after we refused to surrender; “We swear our loyalty to each other, to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.”

    An unusual fellow, but behind the concealment of his literary notoriety he remained the Legionnaire he had once been, and after spying on the Nazis in Berlin in 1939 had returned to Paris to make mischief for her unwelcome guests, and there in 1940 repurposed the oath of the Foreign Legion for what allies he could gather. He said it was the finest thing he ever stole.

     My hope is that I have lived and written at the beginning of the story of humankind, and not at its end.

     What is the meaning of Mariupol?

      Here we may look to its precedents as Last Stands, battles, and sieges; Thermopylae, Malta, Washington crossing the Delaware and the Battle of Trenton, Gallipoli, Stalingrad, and its direct parallel the Siege of Sarajevo. Moments of decision wherein the civilization of humankind hung in the balance, and with it our future possibilities of becoming human.

     Who do we want to become, we humans; slaves and tyrants or a free society of equals? And how much of our humanity are we willing to trade for the chance of such futures?

     What of ourselves can we not afford to lose, without also losing who we are? How much of our humanity can we claw back from the darkness in refusal to submit to those who would enslave us, and in solidarity with each other?

     We must each of us face our own Gate of Fire, as did the Spartans at Thermopylae, and choose.

    What are we worth, if we permit ruthless bandit kings to commit atrocities, plunder, and enslave others?

     What is western civilization worth, if we will not live up to our fine words?   And fine words they remain, such as these written by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence in 1776, a synthesis and revisioning of ideas from Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Rousseau; “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

     What is America, if not a guarantor of democracy and our universal human rights, and a beacon of hope to the world?

    Let us reply with the words written by J.R.R. Tolkien between 1937 and 1955 in his luminous reimagination of the Second World War and the conflict of dominion which immediately followed it between tyranny and democracy, first against fascism and then between the allies who defeated it as spheres of dominion and systems of economic and political organization but both for different dreams of a free society of equals, in the iconic speech of Aragorn at the Black Gate in The Return of the King which unites ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos; “A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day. An hour of wolves and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down, but it is not this day. This day we fight.”

     Join us.  

This Day We Fight: Aragorn’s Speech at the Black Gate

Borders of Infinity, by Lois McMaster Bujold

Frank Gardner on the Significance of Mariupol in this war

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60825226

Hebrew

20 באפריל 2022 מה המשמעות של מריופול? כתובת למתנדבים בוורשה

   בעודנו מתאספים ומתכוננים לקחת את המאבק אל האויב בפעולה ישירה נגד משטר רוסיה עצמה, נגד ולדימיר פוטין והאוליגרכים והאליטות שלו היושבים בראש השלטון וכעת שותפים לפשעי מלחמה ופשעים נגד האנושות אוקראינה ומחוז קרים שלה בכיבוש האימפריאלי של אומה ריבונית ועצמאית וברוסיה בהכנעת אזרחיהם, ובשאר התיאטראות של זה מלחמת העולם השלישית, סוריה, לוב, בלארוס, קזחסטן, נגורנו קרבאך , ובתפיסה של המדינה האמריקנית בבחירות הגנובות של 2016, שהכניסה את סוכנו ובוגדתו של פוטין וחסר הכבוד דונלד טראמפ, ליצן הטרור שלנו, בבית הלבן כדי לפקח על חדירתה וחתרנות הדמוקרטיה על ידי הרייך הרביעי, אנו מתמודדים עם אינספור דוגמאות מחרידות לעתיד המצפה לנו בידי משטרו של פוטין, ובחרנו בהתנגדות כאלטרנטיבה היחידה לעבדות ומוות.

    כאשר אנו מביאים חשבון לעריצות, טרור וזוועות המלחמה, בפשעים נגד האנושות על ידי רוסיה באוקראינה הכוללים הוצאות להורג, עינויים, אונס המוני מאורגן וסחר באזרחים חטופים, לכידת בני ערובה אזרחיים ושימוש בכפייה עבודה, קניבליזם באמצעות מפעלים ניידים, התקפות רצח עם, מחיקת עדויות לפשעי מלחמה באמצעות משרפות ניידות המעידות על תכנון רשמי כחלק ממסע הטרור והוכחה לכך שאינספור הפשעים נגד האנושות של מלחמה זו אינם סטיות אלא בתכנון ובתכנון. פקודות של פוטין ומפקדיו, איומים בהשמדה גרעינית נגד מדינות אירופה ששולחות סיוע הומניטרי, והשמדה המונית של ערים, הפכנו לבית משפט של ערעור אחרון בהגנה על זכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו ועל האנושות שלנו עצמה.

     אסטרטגיית הכיבוש הרוסית נפתחת בהפצצה מתמשכת ובלתי פוסקת ובהרס של בתי חולים, מקלטים, מאגרי מזון, מערכות חשמל, אספקת מים, מסדרונות של סיוע הומניטרי ופינוי פליטים; כל דבר שיכול לעזור לאזרחים לשרוד מצור. ברגע ששום דבר לא נשאר עומד, מתחיל מסע טרור כמו אונס המוני מאורגן, עינויים, קניבליזם וביזה, וכל ניצול משועבד או מוצא להורג. זוהי מלחמה של רצח עם ומחיקה, ולפשיזם יכולה להיות רק תשובה אחת; לעולם לא שוב!

במלחמה זו אשר כעת עלינו, מטרתו של פוטין היא להחזיר את האימפריה הרוסית בכיבוש אוקראינה והים השחור כנקודת שיגור לכיבוש ושליטה של הים התיכון, אירופה, אפריקה והמזרח התיכון; אבל יש לו מטרה מקבילה ומסוכנת הרבה יותר בביטול החוק הבינלאומי וזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו. המטרה האמיתית של הרייך הרביעי ומנהל הבובות שלו ולדימיר פוטין במלחמה זו היא להפוך את רעיון זכויות האדם לחסר משמעות.

    זוהי מלחמת עריצות ופשיזם של דם, אמונה ואדמה נגד הדמוקרטיה וחברה חופשית של שווים, על הרעיון שלכולנו יש משמעות וערך שהם ייחודיים שלנו ונגד שיעבוד וגניבת נפשנו.

     בתוך גבולות הצורה שלנו, של פגמי אנושיותנו ושבירת העולם, אנו נאבקים להשיג את האדם; שלנו היא מהפכה של תיקון עולם, ביטוי עברי שמשמעותו תיקון העולם, המתייחס לתלות ההדדית ולחובת הזהירות שלנו זה לזה כשווים החולקים אנושיות משותפת.

     אני בטוח שכולנו כאן יודעים למה התכוון שלמה ברדין כשחיזר את הביטוי מקובלת לוריא ומהמדרש, אבל למה אני מתכוון בזה?

     ישנם רק שני סוגים של פעולות שאנו בני האדם מסוגלים לבצע; אלה שמאשרים ומעלים אותנו, ואלה שמבזים ומבטלים אותנו.

     אנו חיים בצומת של היסטוריה שעשוי להגדיר את גורל הציוויליזציה שלנו ואת האפשרויות העתידיות להיות אנושיות, במאבק בין עריצות לחירות ובין סולידריות לפילוג, ועלינו כל אחד מאיתנו לבחור למי ברצוננו להיות, אנו בני אנוש; אדונים ועבדים, או חברה חופשית של שווים?

     כפי שאתם יודעים, חברי ואני באים אליכם מהמצור על מריופול, קרב של בשר נגד כוח ואימה שאין להם מענה, של סולידריות נגד פילוג, של אהבה נגד שנאה ושל תקווה נגד פחד.

     כאן, כמו במרד גטו ורשה שחגגנו אתמול, נבחן הרצון האנושי לחירות על ידי אויב המתמוגג בחיקם של המפלצתיים, שמדיניותו ותכנוני המלחמה שלו כטרור בשמחה וביהירות הגלויה של הכוח מכשירים באופן מוחלט. הרס ורצח עם, מלחמה שבה זוועות וקללות משתחררים כטקטיקות של הלם ויראה מתוך כוונה להכניע באמצעות חוסר אונים נלמד ופחד מוחץ ומוכלל.

Polish

20 kwietnia 2022 Co oznacza Mariupol? Adres do Wolontariuszy w Warszawie

   Gdy zbieramy się i przygotowujemy do podjęcia walki z wrogiem w bezpośredniej akcji przeciwko reżimowi samej Rosji, przeciwko Władimirowi Putinowi oraz jego oligarchom i elitom, które zasiadają u steru władzy i są teraz współwinne zbrodni wojennych i zbrodni przeciwko ludzkości zarówno w Ukraina i jej prowincja Krym w imperialnym podboju suwerennego i niepodległego narodu, a w Rosji w ujarzmieniu własnych obywateli, a w innych teatrach tej III wojny światowej, Syrii, Libii, Białorusi, Kazachstanie, Górskim Karabachu , a także w zdobyciu państwa amerykańskiego w skradzionych wyborach 2016, które umieściły zdradzieckiego i niehonorowego agenta Putina i pełnomocnika Donalda Trumpa, naszego klauna terroru, w Białym Domu, aby nadzorować infiltrację i niszczenie demokracji przez Czwartą Rzeszę, my mamy do czynienia z niezliczonymi przerażającymi przykładami przyszłości, która czeka nas z rąk reżimu Putina, a my wybraliśmy Ruch Oporu jako jedyną alternatywę dla niewolnictwa i śmierci.

    Kiedy wprowadzamy rozliczenie za tyranię, terror i okropności wojny, w zbrodniach przeciwko ludzkości dokonanych przez Rosję na Ukrainie, które obejmują egzekucje, tortury, zorganizowane masowe gwałty i handel uprowadzonymi cywilami, schwytanie cywilnych zakładników i użycie sił pracy, kanibalizm z wykorzystaniem mobilnych fabryk, ludobójcze ataki, wymazywanie dowodów zbrodni wojennych z wykorzystaniem mobilnych krematoriów, co wskazuje na oficjalne planowanie w ramach kampanii terroru i dowód, że niezliczone zbrodnie przeciwko ludzkości w tej wojnie nie są aberracją, ale celowo i na rozkazy Putina i jego dowódców, groźby nuklearnej zagłady narodów europejskich wysyłających pomoc humanitarną oraz masowe niszczenie miast, stajemy się ostatnim sądem apelacyjnym w obronie naszych uniwersalnych praw człowieka i samego naszego człowieczeństwa.

     Rosyjska strategia podboju rozpoczyna się ciągłym i bezlitosnym bombardowaniem i niszczeniem szpitali, schronów bombowych, magazynów żywności, systemów zasilania, zaopatrzenia w wodę, korytarzy pomocy humanitarnej i ewakuacji uchodźców; wszystko, co mogłoby pomóc obywatelom przetrwać oblężenie. Gdy nic nie zostanie ocalone, rozpoczyna się kampania terroru, polegająca na zorganizowanych masowych gwałtach, torturach, kanibalizmie i grabieży, a wszyscy, którzy przeżyli, zostają zniewoleni lub straceni. To jest wojna ludobójstwa i wymazywania, a na faszyzm może być tylko jedna odpowiedź; Nigdy więcej!

    W tej wojnie, która teraz nad nami, celem Putina jest przywrócenie Imperium Rosyjskiego w podboju Ukrainy i Morza Czarnego jako platformy startowej do podboju i panowania nad Morzem Śródziemnym, Europą, Afryką i Bliskim Wschodem; ale ma on równoległy i znacznie bardziej niebezpieczny cel, polegający na uchyleniu prawa międzynarodowego i naszych uniwersalnych praw człowieka. Prawdziwym celem Czwartej Rzeszy i jej marionetkowego mistrza Władimira Putina w tej wojnie jest uczynienie bezsensownej idei praw człowieka.

    To jest wojna tyranii i faszyzmów krwi, wiary i ziemi przeciwko demokracji i wolnemu społeczeństwu równych, o ideę, że my wszyscy mamy sens i wartość, która jest wyłącznie nasza i przeciwko zniewoleniu i kradzieży naszych dusz.

     W granicach naszej formy, wad naszego człowieczeństwa i zepsucia świata, walczymy o osiągnięcie człowieczeństwa; nasza jest rewolucją Tikkun Olam, hebrajskiego wyrażenia oznaczającego naprawę świata, które odnosi się do naszej współzależności i obowiązku troski o siebie nawzajem jako równych, którzy mają wspólne człowieczeństwo.

     Jestem pewien, że każdy z nas tutaj wie, co miał na myśli Shlomo Bardin, gdy zmienił frazę z Kabały Lurii i Midraszu, ale co mam przez to na myśli?

     Są tylko dwa rodzaje działań, które my, ludzie, jesteśmy w stanie wykonać; te, które nas utwierdzają i wywyższają, oraz te, które nas poniżają i odczłowieczają.

     Żyjemy na skrzyżowaniu historii, które mogą określić los naszej cywilizacji i przyszłe możliwości stania się człowiekiem, w walce między tyranią a wolnością oraz między solidarnością a podziałem, i każdy z nas musi wybrać, kim chce się stać, ludzie; panowie i niewolnicy czy wolne społeczeństwo równych?

Ukrainian

    20 квітня 2022 Що означає Маріуполь? Звернення до волонтерів у Варшаві

   Збираючись і готуючись до боротьби з ворогом у прямих діях проти режиму самої Росії, проти Володимира Путіна та його олігархів та еліт, які сидять біля керма влади і зараз є причетними до військових злочинів і злочинів проти людства як у Україна та її провінція Крим в імперському завоювання суверенної і незалежної нації і в Росії в підкоренні власних громадян, а на інших театрах цієї Третьої світової війни, Сирії, Лівії, Білорусі, Казахстану, Нагірного Карабаху , а також під час захоплення американської держави на викрадених виборах 2016 року, коли зрадницького й безчесного агента Путіна та довіреної особи Дональда Трампа, нашого клоуна терору, у Білий дім для нагляду за проникненням і підривом демократії Четвертим рейхом, ми ми стикаємося з незліченною кількістю жахливих прикладів майбутнього, яке чекає на нас від рук режиму Путіна, і ми обрали Опір як єдину альтернативу рабству і смерті.

    Оскільки ми приносимо розплату за тиранію, терор і жахи війни, за злочини проти людства, зроблені Росією в Україні, які включають страти, катування, організовані масові зґвалтування та торгівлю викраденими цивільними особами, захоплення цивільних заручників та використання примусових праця, канібалізм з використанням пересувних фабрик, напади геноциду, знищення доказів військових злочинів за допомогою мобільних крематоріїв, що вказує на офіційне планування як частину кампанії терору та доказ того, що незліченна кількість злочинів проти людства цієї війни не є відхиленнями, а задумом і накази Путіна та його командирів, загрози ядерного знищення європейських країн, які надсилають гуманітарну допомогу, і масове знищення міст, ми стаємо останньою апеляційною інстанцією у захисті наших універсальних прав людини та нашого людства.

     Російська завойовницька стратегія починається з постійних і невпинних бомбардувань і руйнувань лікарень, бомбосховищ, складів продовольства, енергосистем, водопостачання, коридорів гуманітарної допомоги та евакуації біженців; все, що могло б допомогти громадянам пережити облогу. Після того, як нічого не залишиться, починається кампанія терору як організовані масові зґвалтування, тортури, канібалізм та мародерство, а будь-які вижили поневолені або страчені. Це війна на геноцид і стирання, і на фашизм може бути лише одна відповідь; Ніколи знову!

У цій війні, яка зараз на нас, мета Путіна — відновити Російську імперію у завоювання України та Чорного моря як стартовий майданчик для завоювання та панування Середземномор’я, Європи, Африки та Близького Сходу; але він має паралельну й набагато більш небезпечну мету — скасування міжнародного права та наших універсальних прав людини. Справжня мета Четвертого рейху та його маріонетка Володимира Путіна у цій війні – позбутися сенсу ідеї прав людини.

    Це війна тиранії та фашизму крові, віри та ґрунту проти демократії та вільного суспільства рівних за ідею, що всі ми маємо сенс і цінність, яка є унікальною, а також проти поневолення та крадіжки наших душ.

     У межах нашої форми, вад нашої людяності та зламаності світу ми боремося за досягнення людського; наша – це революція Тіккуна Олама, єврейської фрази, що означає відновлення світу, яка стосується нашої взаємозалежності та обов’язку піклуватися один про одного як рівних, хто об’єднує спільне людство.

     Я впевнений, що всі ми тут знаємо, що мав на увазі Шломо Бардін, коли переробив фразу з Каббали Лурія і Мідраш, але що я маю на увазі під цим?

     Є лише два види дій, які ми, люди, здатні виконувати; ті, що стверджують і підносять нас, і ті, що принижують і дегуманізують нас.

     Ми живемо на перехресті історії, яка може визначити долю нашої цивілізації та майбутні можливості стати людиною, у боротьбі між тиранією та свободою, між солідарністю та поділом, і кожен із нас має вибрати, ким хоче стати, ми люди; панів і рабів, чи вільне суспільство рівних?

Russian

20 апреля 2022 Что такое Мариуполь? Обращение к волонтерам в Варшаве

   Пока мы собираемся и готовимся принять бой с врагом в прямом действии против самого режима России, против Владимира Путина и его олигархов и элит, которые сидят у руля власти и ныне причастны к военным преступлениям и преступлениям против человечности как в Украина и ее провинция Крым в имперском завоевании суверенной и независимой нации и в России в подчинении собственных граждан, и на других театрах этой Третьей мировой войны, Сирия, Ливия, Беларусь, Казахстан, Нагорный Карабах , а также в захвате американского государства на украденных выборах 2016 года, когда изменнический и бесчестный агент и доверенное лицо Путина Дональд Трамп, наш клоун террора, попал в Белый дом, чтобы наблюдать за проникновением и подрывом демократии Четвертым рейхом, мы столкнулись с бесчисленными ужасными примерами будущего, которое ожидает нас от рук путинского режима, и мы выбрали Сопротивление как единственную альтернативу рабству и смерти.

    Поскольку мы приносим расплату за тиранию, террор и ужасы войны, за преступления против человечности, совершенные Россией на Украине, включая казни, пытки, организованные массовые изнасилования и торговлю похищенными гражданскими лицами, захват гражданских заложников и применение насильственных труд, каннибализм с использованием передвижных заводов, акты геноцида, стирание доказательств военных преступлений с использованием передвижных крематориев, что указывает на официальное планирование как часть кампании террора и доказательство того, что бесчисленные преступления против человечности в ходе этой войны не являются отклонением от нормы, а являются преднамеренными и преднамеренными приказы Путина и его командиров, угрозы ядерного уничтожения европейским странам, отправляющим гуманитарную помощь, и массовое разрушение городов, мы становимся судом последней инстанции в защиту наших универсальных прав человека и самой нашей человечности.

     Российская стратегия завоевания начинается с непрерывных и безжалостных бомбардировок и разрушений больниц, бомбоубежищ, складов продовольствия, энергосистем, водоснабжения, коридоров гуманитарной помощи и эвакуации беженцев; все, что может помочь гражданам пережить осаду. Как только ничего не остается, начинается кампания террора с организованными массовыми изнасилованиями, пытками, каннибализмом и грабежами, а все выжившие порабощаются или казнятся. Это война геноцида и стирания, и фашизму может быть только один ответ; Больше никогда!

    В этой войне, которая сейчас надвигается, цель Путина состоит в том, чтобы восстановить Российскую империю путем завоевания Украины и Черного моря в качестве стартовой площадки для завоевания и господства в Средиземноморье, Европе, Африке и на Ближнем Востоке; но у него есть параллельная и гораздо более опасная цель в отмене международного права и наших универсальных прав человека. Истинная цель Четвертого рейха и его кукловода Владимира Путина в этой войне состоит в том, чтобы лишить смысла идею прав человека.

    Это война тирании и фашизма крови, веры и почвы против демократии и свободного общества равных, за идею о том, что у всех нас есть смысл и ценность, которые принадлежат только нам, и против порабощения и кражи наших душ.

     В пределах нашей формы, недостатков нашей человечности и разбитости мира мы боремся за достижение человеческого; наша — это революция Тиккун Олам, фразы на иврите, означающей восстановление мира, которая указывает на нашу взаимозависимость и обязанность заботиться друг о друге как о равных, разделяющих общую человечность.

     Я уверен, что все мы здесь знаем, что имел в виду Шломо Бардин, когда он переделал фразу из Каббалы Лурии и Мидраша, но что я имею в виду под этим?

     Есть только два вида действий, которые мы, человеческие существа, можем совершать; те, которые утверждают и возвышают нас, и те, которые унижают и дегуманизируют нас.

     Мы живем на перекрестке истории, который может определить судьбу нашей цивилизации и будущие возможности стать людьми, в борьбе между тиранией и свободой, между солидарностью и разделением, и каждый из нас должен выбрать, кем мы хотим стать, мы люди; господа и рабы или свободное общество равных?

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started