July 22 2024 Genocide Joe Purged From Democratic Party Re-Election Campaign, Not As A War Criminal But As An Imbecile

     As with us all, and as a defining characteristic of human being, darkness and light exist in equal measure in Joe Biden as a mirror and figure of America, revolutionary and conservative forces in which our lives are embedded as an imposed condition of struggle and an eternal war in the human heart which both destroys and creates us ceaselessly in processes of adaptation and change.

    Here too are our histories, memories, identities chosen or authorized, which we drag behind us like an invisible reptilian tail; both those we must keep and those we must escape, and if we are very lucky they are not always the same.

    President Biden has withdrawn from the election campaign, not quite an abdication of power as he chose Kamala Harris as his successor who must now bear his vision of our nation as an inclusive and diverse free society of equals into the future as his and possibly our representative, and in many ways our avenger.

    So much remains to be done before the Restoration of America is complete, if such a thing can ever be; herein now I interrogate both the darkness and the light of Biden’s stewardship of America, for I write to you not to praise Caesar, but to bury him. Of his life work as part of the legacies of our history, what must we keep, and what must we escape?  

    As I wrote in my post of February 7 2023, How Is the Restoration of America Coming Along? Biden’s Second State of the Union Address; In his State of the Union address today Biden has roared defiance against fascist tyranny and terror, calling out the empires of Russia and China as well as the fascists of the January 6 Insurrection within the Republican Party as enemies of America and all humankind.

     A declaration of independence from fear and fascism, this speech; repeated endlessly throughout the world and human history by the magic of infinite lenses and a logosphere made of machines who remember ourselves and our world for us.

      How we reshape ourselves and our possible futures as a species of interdependent partners can be determined by such transforms of messages which order how we create human being, meaning, and value; and such systems of signs are a ground of struggle between falsification and those truths written in our flesh, for we wander lost in a wilderness of mirrors.

     Let us glory therefore in the ongoing Restoration of America, and Biden’s magnificent defiance of those who would enslave us, a wail of absurd hope echoing through chasms of darkness.

     Here following my journal of today as comparison is my post in reaction to last year’s State of the Union address, when before the Last Stand at Mariupol I believed peace was still possible, that democracy would triumph over tyranny, solidarity over division, truthtelling and the witness of history over falsification, that systemic and institutional patriarchy, racism, faith as state terror, and the commodification of exploitation capitalism could be reimagined and transformed as we progress toward a global United Humankind; though I yet dream of our species outgrowing states as embodied violence, narratives of identitarian nationalism, our addiction to power and subjugation by authority, and fear as the basis of human exchange, I now question whether we can find healing for the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     At Mariupol I witnessed our most probable future unfolding as the realization of systemic dehumanization and a consequence of politics as the art of fear; utter destruction and ruin, and our degradation to atavisms of instinct and monstrosity beyond the limits of the human.

     To become human is a forlorn hope; yet hope is a power which cannot be taken from us when all else is lost. Like the refusal to submit to authority, which confers freedom as a primary human act of self-creation and self-ownership as seizures of power, to hope is to enact revolutionary struggle, possibly the first such act as a causal force of change and transformation.

     With hope we may claw our way out of the ruins of civilization and make yet another Last Stand, beyond possibility of victory or even survival.

     What else do we have to resist with, which is an intrinsic and defining human quality and cannot be taken from us by those who would enslave us and steal our souls?

     Love, which transcends the limits of our form and of our modern pathology of disconnectedness, and returns to us our true and best selves as we see this in each other. To love is to discover and create ourselves anew, and this too cannot be bought and sold, unstoppable as the tides.

     Faith in each other as solidarity and the praxis of our values in action; as the Oath of the Resistance ends; “to abandon not our fellows.” As the line in the film Oz goes; “Because if you believe, anything is possible.” A marvelous film, which calls each of us to become our own wizard and best selves in our stewardship of others.

      Hope as freedom, love as equality, and faith as solidarity of action; such is the dream of America and democracy as a free society of equals.   

     As I wrote in my post of March 2 2022, State of the Union: the Restoration of America, Democracy, and Western Civilization; In the State of the Union address we have witnessed the Restoration of America as the primary guarantor of global democracy and our universal human rights, and of western civilization as a free society of equals founded in the Forum of Athens as a self-critical system designed to question its own authority, to change and adapt through revolutionary innovation and discovery while protecting our four primary values and ideals; freedom, equality, truth, and justice. Of all this President Biden is our chosen and undisputable champion, of America and of all humankind.

    I would like to name and invoke another ideal, that of peace; but peace and the abandonment of the social use of force and violence is elusive. We forebear for now to send armies of Liberation to Ukraine; but I have found that the use of force is contingent on the level of threat and fear, and how long this will hold if Putin begins attacking NATO with nuclear weapons as he has declared his intent to do is a thing to ponder with great dread.

     Our possible futures hold many which are nothingness and the annihilation of humankind; and many more in which centuries of world war and an age of tyranny shape us to the monstrous purposes of authoritarian power and institutionalized violence, in which our dehumanization, falsification, and commodification by those who would enslave us and steal our souls impose degradation beyond the limits of the human, and we awake one day to a brave new world of posthuman species for whom we are the mythic demons who poisoned and destroyed the earth.

    Such is the vision of our possible futures I beheld in the moment of my Awakening, a term which enters popular culture from Buddhism, when I was hurled from my body by the pressure wave of a grenade thrown by a policeman into a crowd of protestors at the age of nine, during the Bloody Thursday Massacre, May 15 1969, People’s Park Berkeley, the most terrible incident of domestic state terror in American history.

    Myriads of possibilities of becoming human were impressed on the mind of a child as I stood outside of time and the limits of myself, like a seed of change and transformation, a moment from which alternate destinies and intentions unfold. In far too few of them, something like ourselves can look back across millennia at this time when liberty and tyranny hang in the balance.

     On this seventh day of the Invasion of Ukraine, as the UN and EU announce solidarity actions with Ukraine and resistance to Russia timed to coordinate with Biden’s State of the Union address, we fight for liberty versus tyranny in both Ukraine and Russia, and for the future of global democracy and the survival of humankind.

     In his historic speech last night, Joe Biden warned Vladimir Putin: ‘Freedom Will Always Triumph Over Tyranny’. It’s up to us now, to make it real.

    Lest all that we have ever dreamed and been or may ever be is lost.

     As written by Alan Moore in V For Vendetta; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”   

       In the balance against all of this glorious championing of democracy against Trump’s fascist capture of the state as a theocratic-patriarchal tyranny of Gideonite sexual terror and white supremacist terror, we have the abjection,  failure of empathy, and abandonment of the idea of universal human rights of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians, in which Genocide Joe has made us all complicit. He several times sent war materiel to Israel, refused to enact  Boycott, Sanction, and Divestiture to silence the bombs and end the war, to bring Netanyahu to justice as a war criminal, or to join the civilized nations of the world in declaring the state of Israel a terrorist regime. Hence the chant of the Cheerleaders For Change; “Genocide Joe has got to go,” and now he has.

      For myself, Biden’s mental competence is irrelevant; if this were a bar for being a President, Trump would have never been one either. America is a geriocracy ruled by men whose ideas were formed fifty years ago. But genocide and crimes against humanity are a line we must not cross, not and remain human beings, and if you do such things I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

     Biden is the second American President to have tried to kill me personally, and the only one I voted for; the other being then-Governor Ronald Reagan when he ordered the police to open fire on the student Divest From Israel protesters at UC Berkeley in 1969 on Bloody Thursday, the most massive incident of state terror since the Civil War. Over fifty years later, Biden chose not to join our global sanction of Israeli war supply shipping or our counter-blockade of the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza, which a Fleet Carrier Group could have broken if necessary to deliver food and medicine to civilians, but to destroy our drone positions with his own drones.   

     As I wrote in my post of March 6 2024, Super Tuesday Confronts Us With A Grim Choice Of Futures, and We Must Change the Rules of the Game;  As I have often said since the October 7 terrorist attack which has upended the political landscape of America in our year of elections between tyranny and liberty, If you enable or enact genocide and crimes against humanity, I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

     Yet this election may decide the survival of democracy and humankind across the coming several centuries, and I now calculate our chances to escape an Age of Tyranny and wars of unimaginable horrors at less than two percent; I say again, I believe that in less than two possible futures out of every one hundred, something resembling ourselves can look at the ruins of our civilization and our species a millennium from now with questioning and wonder. With all of our technology and our understanding, why did we choose to annihilate ourselves?

     The dangers of ideological fracture and division cannot be overstated; the IWW global union movement self destructed over the issue of peace during World War One, as did the Social Democrats in Germany, removing our respective blocking forces for the rise of fascism and resulting in the Second World War; there are many other and more recent examples of movements for change and progress being shattered by forces of reaction and the state, but these two will serve to illustrate what will happen next if Trump once again captures the state.

     We must unite in solidarity together to confront this threat and drive fascist tyranny from the stage of history.

     Yet Biden’s massive and extralegal supply of Israel with war material while it is used to rain death of the people of Gaza, on the absurd pretext that the criminals who attacked Israel claim to act in their name as a strategy of subjugation of the Palestinians to their theocratic rule, such decisions by Biden personally have made all of us as Americans complicit in genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and other crimes against humanity.

      To this I say; Never Again!

      Our choice is now to abandon either democracy and all of our rights as citizens, or the idea of our universal human rights and our historic role as their guarantor throughout the world. I’d like to keep both democracy and human rights.

     How can we do this and win a future for humankind as a free society of equals who are guarantors of each other’s rights as citizens and as human beings?

     If this is our goal, and with the imposed conditions of struggle as they have resolved themselves on Super Tuesday wherein Trump and Biden will face off once again in the sudden death match of futures that is our Presidential election, only one course of action remains for us which bears any hope for the triumph of liberty over tyranny; change the rules of the game.

      I’m sure we can all think of many possibilities for bringing change with such a mission, but tonight I find myself enchanted with the idea of liberating Biden from Biden as articulated by Michael Moore. Who better to trust as our moral compass than the author of V For Vendetta, who wrote the immortal words; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”

       Here are my thoughts on our elections in a less hopeful moment, in my post of January 4 2023, On America’s Complicity In Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes In Gaza; Biden has made us all complicit in ethnic cleansing in Gaza, war crimes our taxes pay for. America has abandoned the idea of our universal human rights. Our nation has fallen, and with it global civilization based on humanist values and democracy.

     Nothing remains to be saved; maybe the Rights of Man and America as a free society of equals was always a performance, lies and illusions designed to distract us from the fact that we are all slaves of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and the state merely institutions of force and control.

      Joe Biden has betrayed us, failed to place his life and ours in the balance with those of the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, and instead enabled and conspired in crimes against humanity with Netanyahu and the theocratic fascist settler regime and imperial conquest and dominion of the state of Israel, which learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis.

     And this we must resist, beyond hope of victory or survival, in solidarity as guarantors of each others humanity. To fascism of blood, faith, and soil and to state tyranny and terror regardless of where it surfaces or in whose interest it is perpetrated, we must give the only reply it merits; Never Again!                  

     To this my unfiltered reaction to a Joe Biden campaign fundraising post timed to leverage the despair and torment of others in service to power, a comment has articulated one of the primary arguments in the apologetics of power; that we cannot control our proxy state, and secondarily that the crimes against humanity of Israel have the mandate of popular support here in America which place us all with Biden in the fork of a dilemma.

     Here is the comment in question; “oh, come on. Dramatic much? Netanyahu is the criminal, Biden doesn’t control him, and cannot abandon our strongest ally in the region. Half the country wants to see Hamas wiped out, so what should Biden do? Listen just to this side? Get real.”

     To this I replied; Yes, Netanyahu is a war criminal, but Biden has not only refused to stop funding ethnic cleansing, but has sent military aid to Israel and made us all complicit. We have abandoned the idea of universal human rights in funding the random mass murders of civilians with our taxes, voting to block the UN from bringing Netanyahu to trial for war crimes, and refusal to use our powers of Boycott, Divest, and Sanction to stop the Gaza War and bring democracy to Israel with regime change and the reimagination and transformation of systems of unequal power and state tyranny and terror.

       Our nation has chosen to send warships to the perpetrator, and not humanitarian aid to the victims, when we could easily have broken the Israeli blockade of food, water, and medical relief with our immense Navy, and silenced the bombs. It is not only the humanity of the Palestinians which has been abrogated here, but of our own as well.

     In fact America does control Israel as a client state through our taxes and military support, but to what ends? Do we advance the cause of secular democracy or theocratic tyranny, of peace or war, liberty or submission to force and control, of our universal human rights or hierarchies of elite membership and exclusionary otherness based on divisions of race and faith?

     In a region of one people divided by history and in our own nation, are we building bridges or walls?

     Biden was elected to lead the Restoration of America after the loathsome regime of Traitor Trump, and has betrayed us. There is nothing left of us to save.

     America has fallen, both as a democracy due to the capture of the Republican Party by a fascist-theocratic Fourth Reich and the subversions of our institutions and ideals by the Trump regime of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror, and because of the Democratic Party’s refusal to confront evil and purge our destroyers from among us, both in our client state of Israel and here in America in the wake of the January 6 Insurrection. All of this generates from the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; fear weaponized in service to power by those who would enslave us as divisions of belonging and exclusionary otherness, and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.

     In Gaza we see the inevitable results of this process of dehumanization, for to make an idea about a kind of people is an act of violence, and no matter where one begins with othering we always end up at the gates of Auschwitz. And this we must Resist.

      Why must we be each other’s jailors, and not each other’s liberators?

     Who do we want to become, we humans; masters and slaves, or a free society of equals?

    Get real, ends the apologetics of power, referencing the Realpolitik of Henry Kissinger used so infamously to authorize our imperial wars in Vietnam and Central America including the Mayan Genocide in Guatemala, the assassination of Salvador Allende in Chile, and the massacres of the Suharto regime of Indonesia. A foreign policy modeled on Hitler’s dictum; “Who now remembers the extermination of the Armenians? The world respects only power” does not lead to a more humane future, nor to a United Humankind and a free society of equals.

     In this injunction to get real and its legacies of history bearing horrors, atrocities, and crimes against humanity as state policy and fear become an engine of destruction, there are embedded issues and forces central to the questions of our humanity and how we choose to be human together; what is truth, who is authorized to question it, and how can we engage in the sacred calling to pursue the truth without falsification by the lies and illusions of propaganda?

      We wander in a Wilderness of Mirrors, wherein all claims must be questioned, especially those of authorities who claim to speak and act for us as a strategy of subjugation and the manufacture of consent. To this I can but say, democracy requires an electorate able to perform the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen; Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

    Get real, we are exhorted by those who wish to steal our power. In Gaza, real people are dying because we are willing to sacrifice their lives to our power.

      As I wrote in my post of January 24 2024 Now Begins the Last Stand Against Fascism In America: Our 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, and Why I Am Voting For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For President of the United States; “When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler hand is the surest winner”; so wrote Shakespeare in Henry V, and for all of us, all who now live or ever will, in America and throughout the world, I hope this is still true.

    Next November, we will see.

    The test of the New Hampshire Primary has left only Biden and Trump on the field as contenders for the title, and I can vote for neither of them.

     Israel has unleashed The Nothing in Gaza, a rain of fire and death paid for with our taxes and enabled by Biden the Baby Killer who has made us all complicit in ethnic cleansing and genocide, and in so doing has abandoned our historic role as a guarantor of universal human rights.

     What are we, we Americans, if not a Band of Brothers who are guarantors of each other’s humanity?

     As I wrote to Biden in open letter here in October and have performed in organizing Resistance in Palestine and Israel, and in direct action in the counter-blockade of the Red Sea Campaign to break the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid to Palestine; If you commit genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

      On August 18 2020 I declared for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as President of the United States in the 2024 election, and subsequent history only confirms my decision.

      There are other issues I have with Biden remaining as the leader of the Restoration of America; first, he began his career occupying the space of George Wallace as a leader of white supremacists against school integration and bussing, exactly opposite Bernie Sanders, which tells me everything I need to know about a man and where his heart is. Second, he was with Bush an architect of the Iraq War, a vast war crime planned at Haliburton in Texas to seize oil fields for Bush’s patrons, and of the Patriot Act which placed America under martial law and militarized the police as an army of Occupation. Third, he acted as chief silencer of women’s voices in the Anita Hill trial which defended the patriarchal right of seigneur and left Justice Thomas in place to monkeywrench our democracy.

       For myself, the turning point in my understanding of Biden and his role as enforcer of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege rather than a liberator came with his assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, which placed him in moral equivalence to Trump and the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

      As I wrote in my post of February 4 2022, A Stain of Cruelty: the Assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi; To paraphrase the line from Hamlet and Star Trek in season one, episode 13, The Conscience of the King; There’s a stain of cruelty on your armor, President Biden.

    We have answered terror and death with terror and death, and this is both tragic and shameful. Force cannot answer force, nor heal the flaws of our humanity.

    As written for CNN by Barbara Starr, Oren Liebermann, Jeremy Herb and Eyad Kourdi; “It was the biggest US raid in the country since the 2019 operation that killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

     Biden spoke from the White House Thursday morning to announce that the operation had taken “a major terrorist leader off the battlefield.”

     “Thanks to the bravery of our troops, this horrible terrorist leader is no more,” Biden said from the Roosevelt Room. “Knowing that terrorist had chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a Special Forces raid at a much a greater risk to our own people rather than targeting him with an airstrike.”

    Now and then Biden reminds us all that he was among the principal collaborators in Bush’s invasion of Iraq as imperial conquest and colonial plunder to seize the strategic resource of oil by which America maintains a global hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege, an addiction which will result in the extinction of humankind as a species, and in the authorization through the Patriot Act of a carceral state of brutal force and pervasive surveillance and thought control exceeded only by Xin Jinping’s holocaust of the Uighurs of Xinjiang, which has enabled the most massive theft of our freedoms in our history, including the McCarthy era, and the most bizarre and reprehensible regime of torture, most infamous in the crimes against humanity perpetrated at Guantanamo and other secret prisons for political enemies of the regime and its oligarchic, plutocratic, and corporate robber baron paymasters, including even the grisly hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials.

    Once again our heroes and champions are proven to have feet of clay, and I mourn the failure of moral vision and addiction to power and the use of force and violence of President Biden, our government, and America as a guarantor of universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

    On this day and all too often, the Promethean Fire of the Torch of Liberty which illuminates the gates of our nation in New York Harbor did not reach across the wild seas to foreign shores. This is a great tragedy, and it is a tragedy which is ours and for which we must answer.

     The deaths of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi and his family as a consequence of America’s raid on his home, not an arrest for crimes provable in a court of law but political assassinations, are rightly being compared in the media to the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi by Trump. This situates Biden and Trump on an equal level of criminal amorality and state terror.

    Before the stage of the world and history, it also generates moral equivalence between ISIS and America, as our enemies intend by their provocations as a strategy of delegitimation of a regime. I use this myself as a democracy activist, for the art of revolution is about claiming the moral high ground and the delegitimation of authority and seizing control of the narrative.

    Sending armies and police to enforce virtue through violence and repression is not only evil, it is also stupid; for it plays into the hands of the enemy. As Shakespeare teaches us in Henry V; “When lenity and cruelty play for kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.”

    There are still notable differences between Biden and Trump, and between the goals, values, and ideals of Democrats and Republicans, madness and treason among them. But today those differences became suddenly and horrifically more narrow, and I fear we will need more than the eye of a needle as a window to a better future.

     As written by Jonathan Cohn in The Guardian, in an article entitled How History Might Remember Joe Biden’s Presidency; “Millions of new jobs, many in a flourishing new American manufacturing sector geared toward clean energy.

     Higher prices at the grocery store, but also more dollars in paychecks.

     A record low in the number of Americans without health insurance, plus a historic — if fleeting — reduction in child poverty.

     Stronger international alliances, amid a bloody invasion of Ukraine and civilian catastrophe in the Middle East.

     These are among the major developments tied to policy initiatives of Joe Biden’s presidency — which, because of his decision not to seek reelection, will end one way or another by Jan. 20, 2025. By any reasonable standard, they add up to a tenure of enormous consequence.

     In less than four years, policy choices from the Biden administration have changed literally millions of lives in the U.S. and around the world, and maybe altered the course of climate change as well. It’s no exaggeration to say his record rivals that of any first-term president in the last half-century.

     Still, it’s early to render definitive judgments on his policy legacy. Too much depends on seeing how his initiatives and decisions play out over time, what precise effects they have and, most immediately, whether his accomplishments even outlast his time in the White House.

     If Donald Trump ends up winning in November, he’ll surely have something to say about that.

     A Signature Piece Of Legislation

     Biden’s signature achievement is the Inflation Reduction Act, the sweeping legislation that passed Congress on a party-line vote and that the president signed in August 2022. The name is misleading: Its central component is a massive federal investment in clean energy that, projections suggest, could add up to more than $1 trillion by the time all the money is accounted for.

     Together with a series of regulations that effectively reduce incentives to create carbon emissions, the law’s investments have spurred a boom in factory-building and manufacturing. The proof of the impact is in the solar arrays and wind turbines popping up all across the Southwest and the Great Plains, along with the electric vehicle plants rising in the Midwest and across a new “Battery Belt” in the South. These projects mean employment, and represent a significant chunk of the estimated 15 million jobs that the U.S. has created during Biden’s presidency.

     The other big piece of the Inflation Reduction Act — and one that, in spirit, hews closer to the name of the legislation — is a series of measures designed to reduce the price of health care, including pharmaceuticals.

     The Inflation Reduction Act allows the federal government to negotiate directly with manufacturers, imposes penalties for rapid price hikes, and imposes a $35 cap on insulin for seniors and people with disabilities. Most of the provisions affect only Medicare, and even then only some drugs. But the law gives the federal government authority that counterparts abroad have long had, and that U.S. lawmakers in the future can expand.

     Yet another Inflation Reduction Act provision offers extra financial assistance for individuals buying insurance through the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. These new subsidies can reduce the cost of insurance by hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year. They are a big reason the proportion of Americans without insurance fell to 7.7%, the lowest level ever.

     Action On Health Care, The Economy

     The other factor in bringing down the number of uninsured people was a temporary, pandemic-related prohibition on states reviewing and disenrolling people from Medicaid. That prohibition has ended, which means the uninsured rate is likely to creep up in the next year or two.

     The poverty level among children has already come back up, following a record-setting decline that was tied to yet another pandemic measure — namely, a set of tax breaks and direct cash payments in the American Rescue Plan, a Democratic bill that Biden signed shortly after taking office.

     Biden and Democratic leaders had hoped to make some of those relief measures permanent. Their efforts to round up the votes fell just short. But the American Rescue Plan did what it was supposed to do: It buoyed the economy and sustained tens of millions of American households, at a time when COVID-19 and the reaction to it threatened to plunge the nation into a full-blown depression.

     All policies have trade-offs, of course. The massive public expenditures behind those relief efforts likely contributed to inflation, which peaked at 9.1% in 2022. People felt it viscerally when they bought food or clothing, put gas in their car, or tried to buy a house. But inflation was a worldwide phenomenon, tied to supply chain problems and other pandemic-related factors.

     Inflation has since come back down, at least in the U.S., while wages are up and unemployment is hovering near 50-year lows. Analysts and leaders abroad have noticed, even if American voters haven’t, and editors at The Economist have been marveling at “America’s astonishing economic record.”

     Building an economy that can continue to thrive in the future has been a big focus of Biden’s, and led to the enactment of two other major laws: the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which allocated more than $850 billion for everything from laying broadband lines to repairing dilapidated bridges, and the CHIPS and Science Act, which put nearly $300 billion into high-tech research and development. Both passed Congress with significant Republican votes, remarkable in itself given the polarization in U.S. politics.

     Issuing Regulations, Appointing Judges

     Biden didn’t achieve any of this alone. He worked closely with congressional leaders, as presidents always do. He also had the benefit of a (mostly) united Democratic caucus that, though smaller in size than its Obama-era counterpart, had a more liberal orientation with far fewer conservative dissenters.

     The dissenters still mattered, enough to kill what Biden had hoped would be another major achievement: historic investment in the care economy intended to raise wages of child care workers and home health aides, while making it easier for families to pay for those services.

     An attempt to pass bipartisan immigration reforms failed as well, leaving the Biden administration without the tools to address a surge in border crossings that has put a major and ongoing strain on city and state governments responsible for the migrants.

     But throughout his presidency, Biden used regulatory power to make incremental progress on long-sought goals he couldn’t achieve through legislation — by hiking the minimum wage for federal workers, for example, or forgiving college debt for targeted populations.

     Regulatory changes are easier than laws for subsequent administrations to reverse, and they can run into successful legal challenges. That’s especially true when lower courts heavily populated with Trump-appointed judges are applying principles handed down from a conservative Supreme Court majority hell-bent on scaling back federal regulatory authority.

     But Biden has done what he could to provide some ideological balance by putting more than 200 judges on the federal bench, more or less matching Trump’s rate for the same time span. That includes the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who in 2022 became the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court.

     Jackson is just 53 years old, which means she can keep writing opinions defending causes like reproductive rights for decades to come. And although today she’s stuck putting most of those arguments into dissents with her two fellow liberal justices, she might be around long enough to see the court’s majority evolve or change, so that it retreats from its decadeslong march to the right.

     Alliances, Wars And Diplomacy

     The other area where presidents have more authority to act on their own is foreign policy. And there, Biden has left some especially clear marks, though frequently in ways that were — and remain — controversial.

     He pulled American forces out of Afghanistan for good, a goal his predecessors and (according to polls) the public supported, and evacuated some 70,000 Afghan allies in the process. But 13 U.S. service members and dozens of civilians died in a bombing during the chaotic withdrawal, which ultimately left behind tens of thousands of Afghan allies hoping to escape — and left the Taliban once again in charge of the country.

     More recently, Biden has strongly backed Israel ever since Hamas militants attacked the country and massacred civilians on Oct. 7, 2023. Biden has pushed back only tepidly — and, by most accounts, ineffectively — against an Israeli response that has literally flattened much of Gaza, killing tens of thousands of people and leaving many more in dire, life-threatening humanitarian conditions.

     In both instances, it’s hard to know exactly what has happened, or what could have happened in alternative scenarios, given the factual ambiguities of armed conflict and the secretive nature of diplomacy. Biden’s handiwork and its impact are clearer when it comes to NATO, which, appropriately enough, held its 75th anniversary summit in Washington just a few weeks ago.

     Biden led efforts to expand the alliance with the addition of Finland and Sweden, and to strengthen it by drawing larger financial and troop contributions from member states. In 2022, Biden organized international backing for Ukraine following Russia’s invasion, providing diplomatic, financial and military support that are still propping up the country today.

     The Legacy At Stake In November

     America’s support of Ukraine could be one of the first things to go in a second Trump presidency. Trump, whose affinity for Russian President Vladimir Putin is no secret, has pledged to demand a cessation of hostilities under terms most analysts think would be highly favorable to the Russians. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), who is now Trump’s running mate, has led calls in Congress for stopping Ukraine aid.

     But the list of Biden accomplishments that Trump could reverse doesn’t stop there.

     Trump has said he wants to take away the big push for clean energy, vowing to end what he calls the “electric vehicle mandate” on “day one.” He has said he still wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act, just like he tried so desperately to do in 2017, posting on his Truth Social platform that “Obamacare sucks!” and promising the same mythical replacement he always touts but never specifies. Even if Trump decides against another run at full repeal, he seems unlikely to support renewal of Biden’s extra insurance subsidies, the funding for which runs out in 2025.

     It’s difficult to be certain exactly which of these priorities Trump might pursue or when, because he doesn’t make concrete policy commitments or issue detailed policy papers in the traditional way. But credible guides to his behavior are out there.

     In addition to documents like Project 2025, the right-wing governing agenda his current and former aides have put together, there’s the historical record from his last turn in office, when he signed legislation reopening the Arctic wildlife lands for drilling, undid new civil rights protections for the LGBTQ+ community, and reversed countless immigration directives.

     Biden on the campaign trail warned about the threat to his administration’s accomplishments, lamenting that all of his new laws and regulations — and their effects on daily life — haven’t gotten the attention they deserve. He had a point. Awareness of his accomplishments is so low that Republican lawmakers frequently felt comfortable taking credit for benefits in their districts or states, even when they had voted against them in Congress.

     History’s verdict is likely to be more accurate and more laudatory, because with time, it will be easier to take the full measure of what Biden has really done. But a lot depends on how many of his achievements survive. That’s why the best thing Biden may have done for his legacy is giving another, more capable Democrat a fighting chance to protect it.”

     As written by Martin Pengelly in The Guardian, in an article entitled The tragedy and resilience of Joe Biden: a look back at a life in politics: The oldest-ever American president’s political career began in 1972 and culminates as he yields to pressure to step aside; “Joe Biden’s historic decision on Sunday to step down as the Democratic nominee for president signals an imminent end to one of the most consequential American political careers.

     At 81, the oldest president ever sworn in has finally yielded to time – and his own party. Someone else, possibly the vice-president, Kamala Harris, will face Donald Trump in November.

     Biden, who endorsed Harris on Sunday, will remain in the White House until January. But Democrats and Republicans will soon survey something new: a political landscape without Biden at its centre.

     Born in Pennsylvania in 1942, Biden attended the University of Delaware and Syracuse law school, became a public defender, then entered politics. A natural campaigner, in 1972, at just 29, he ran for US Senate, scoring a huge upset over J Caleb Boggs, a two-term Republican more than twice his age.

     The same year, voters gave Richard Nixon a landslide win. Nixon was the 37th president. In 2021, Biden would become the 46th. In that 49-year span, as eight presidents came and went, Biden was a senator for 36 years, vice-president for eight.

     As a junior senator, Biden suffered his first, but not last, tragedy when a car crash killed his wife, Neilia Biden, and one-year-old daughter, Naomi, at Christmas in 1972. Biden became known for riding the rails, from Delaware to Washington DC and back, to care for his sons, Beau and Hunter, who survived the accident.

     He married his second wife, Jill Jacobs, in 1977, and their daughter, Ashley,  was born four years later.

     For 17 years, Biden was a ranking member or chair of the Senate judiciary committee. He led five supreme court confirmations. In 1991 the nominee, Clarence Thomas, was accused of sexual harassment and Biden was widely seen to have mishandled the hearings. In 2019, he said Thomas’s accuser, Anita Hill, “did not get treated well. I take responsibility for that.”

     Biden’s record on crime would also haunt him, particularly his support for a 1994 bill many say contributed to problems of mass incarceration and racial injustice. Another 1994 bill, banning assault weapons, remained a source of pride.

     For 11 years, Biden was chair or ranking member of the foreign relations committee. In 1991, he voted against the Gulf war. In 2002, after 9/11, he voted for the invasion of Iraq. He later said that vote was wrong.

     In 1987, Biden first ran for president. At 45, he sought comparison with John F Kennedy but as reported by Richard Ben Cramer in the campaign classic What It Takes, youth, ambition and drive were not enough to prevent embarrassing failure.

     Biden took to quoting Neil Kinnock, then Labour leader in Britain, about being the first member of his family to go to college. Unfortunately, Biden stopped saying he was quoting.

    Kinnock didn’t mind but the US press did. Biden’s freewheeling speaking style (and accompanying evocations of his Irish ancestry) often left him open to error. But he was undoubtedly an effective communicator, all the more remarkably so given he stammered as a child.

     Months after abandoning his presidential campaign, Biden suffered a brain aneurysm so severe a priest was called to administer last rites. Months later, he suffered another.

     He was nothing if not resilient. Twenty years later, he ran for president again. A great debate stage line, about a Republican rival, went down in history: “Rudy Giuliani, there’s only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun, a verb and 9/11.” But Biden soon dropped out.

    Barack Obama won the nomination. When the Illinois senator, 47, picked Biden, 66, as his running mate, the New York Times said Obama had acquired “a longtime Washington hand” who could “reassure voters” rather than “deliver a state or reinforce [a] message of change”.

     Biden spent eight years as vice-president, his working relationship with Obama, reporting suggested, not quite so close as it was often portrayed. Biden played key roles in successes including advancing LGBTQ+ rights, legislating to prevent violence against women and securing healthcare reform. A push for gun reform failed.

     Biden eyed a third presidential run but in 2015 the death of his son Beau from brain cancer took a terrible toll. Furthermore, Obama backed Hillary Clinton.

     Amid the chaos of the Trump years, Biden decided to run again. Significant support from Black voters propelled a primary win. In the year of Covid, campaign travel was limited. For a 77-year-old candidate, that wasn’t much of a problem. Come the election, Biden won by more than 7m votes and with electoral college ease.

     The first major book on 2020 was called Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency. Regardless, his campaign message about a “battle for the soul of America” fueled two productive years. With congressional Democrats, Biden secured major legislation, boosting the economy after Covid, securing infrastructure investment and funding the climate crisis fight.

     Trump had incited an attack on Congress, but Trumpism would not die. Republicans took back the House. Biden oversaw foreign policy disaster – the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan – and success, marshalling support for Ukraine against Russia.

     The dam could not hold. Questions about Biden’s age and fitness ran at a hum before the disastrous debate in Atlanta in June saw Democratic dissent burst through.

     At first, Biden displayed characteristic fire, blaming “elites” to which he never felt he belonged, vowing to fight on. But then Trump survived an assassination attempt and emerged seemingly stronger than ever.

     Democratic calls for Biden to quit grew louder. Eventually, he heard them.”

     Where does this leave us now? In a crisis of legitimacy within the Democratic Party as a united front of Resistance to Trump, the Party of Treason, and the capture of the state by the Fourth Reich.

    We have brought the Chaos, and created a space of free play in which anything is possible through delegitimation, fracture, and disruption of Biden’s regime of complicity in Israeli terror and tyranny; now we must act in Solidarity to utterly destroy and renounce as a nation the Republican Party and its subversion of democracy set forth in Project 2025, a blueprint for theocratic fascist tyranny.

      But we must also use this liminal time of chaotization to reimagine and transform our own vision of the future, and to make the Green New Deal, Universal Healthcare including access to abortion, and the liberation of Palestine and regime change in Israel intrinsic core policies of the Democratic Party platform and this November of America.

    Let us dream a better future than we have the past.

     As I wrote in my post of June 27 2024, This Is Bullshit: the First Biden-Trump Debate of the 2024 Presidential Election;  This is bullshit.

     Two antique visions of America battle for our future, Traitor Trump the fascist tyrant and Russian agent whose mission is to bring down democracy, versus Genocide Joe the neoliberal who made us complicit in crimes against humanity in Gaza and refuses to protect free speech and rights of protest at universities, abandoning both our rights as citizens and our universal human rights. Our choice of futures is now between a theocratic white supremacist patriarchy led by a rapist, and the Bill of Rights made meaningless. All other issues are misdirections and a Wilderness of Mirrors.

     A few short days ago, Biden set hero of the people Julian Assange free, a victory for the transparency of the state and our freedoms of information, speech, and press, but with conditions which echo those offered to the IWW unionists imprisoned by the state long ago for mobilizing against capital and the commodification and dehumanization of the working class. Biden has not championed our rights, but rid his regime of an embarrassing prisoner at the cost of our rights and in abandonment of the idea of journalism as a sacred calling to pursue of truth.

     Who thinks Biden is on the side of the people against tyranny, after this? Biden, who began his career leading white separatists against school integration, chief silencer of women’s witness in the Anita Hill trial which bequeathed us the kleptocratic grifter Clarence Thomas, architect of the invasion of Iraq to steal oil wells as a strategic resource of imperial dominion? And who has done nothing to disarm the police as institutional white supremacist terror, nothing to abolish racist terror at our border and replace ICE and Border Patrol with a mercy force to provide safe conduct for migrants, nothing to disarm Israel and end our complicity in genocide.

     There are vast differences between Biden and Trump, madness, treason, and fascism among them, but this does not make the Democratic Party’s soft tyranny less terrible than the Republican Party’s theocratic patriarchal sexual terror and Nazi white supremacist terror.

      There is but one path forward to a future free of both kinds of tyranny and terror; Let us bring the Chaos and transformative change, and create a true free society of equals and a United Humankind.

     Now is the time to reimagine and transform ourselves and our nation; there is no better time, and there may be no other time.

Biden in his glory:

Biden’s Democracy Versus Tyranny Speech on MSN

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/watch-president-joe-bidens-full-prime-time-address/vi-AA11nl2W?category=foryou

Joe Biden’s political career across the decades – in pictures

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2024/jul/22/joe-bidens-political-career-across-the-decades-in-pictures?CMP=share_btn_link

The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden’s White House and the Struggle for America’s Future, Franklin Foer

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/136342747-the-last-politician?ref=rae_2

Joe Biden: A Life of Trial and Redemption, Jules Witcover

V For Vendetta film trailer

Darkest Hour: You cannot Reason With a Tiger When Your Head Is In Its Mouth

Oz the Great and Powerful trailer

    I thought this was the Presidential debate; when they tell you the day of your deliverance is at hand, you should be running.

Masque of the Red Death full movie

The 48 hours that consigned Joe Biden’s 2024 candidacy to history

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/22/joe-biden-election-drops-out?CMP=share_btn_url

Full 2023 President Biden State of the Union annotated and fact-checked – CNN

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2023/02/annotated-fact-checked-president-biden-sotu/

How History Might Remember Joe Biden’s Presidency

The tragedy and resilience of Joe Biden: a look back at a life in politics:

The oldest-ever American president’s political career began in 1972 and culminates as he yields to pressure to step aside

Biden endorses Kamala Harris for president after dropping out of race

Biden’s selfless decision to drop out sets stage for an entirely different election

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/21/biden-decision-drop-analysis?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1mCUJ9bsUGkbJFOWcgClN7HkzinD_skVBQcyRfcdMg2S8KmWPrtb_4NXY_aem_Pu_-TnB9skATSY_mccr9Tw

                      Songs of Light

August 12 2022  Hope For the Survival of Humankind: Biden’s Climate Bill

July 8 2022 Biden Signs Order Protecting Women’s Rights of Reproduction and Bodily Autonomy

January 12 2022 “The Battle for the Soul of America Is Not Over”; Biden Calls for the End of White Supremacist State Terror as Vote Suppression and the Theft of Black Citizenship

December 11 2021 Biden’s Summit For Democracy: Who Do We Want to Become, and What Are We Willing to Do to Free Ourselves From Those Who Would Enslave Us?

November 9 2021 Restoring the Balance: Anniversary of Biden’s Historic Call For Unity “Let Us End This Grim Era Of Demonization”

April 19 2021 Biden Proclaims the End of America’s War in Afghanistan: Hooray, and Good Luck With That

March 12 2021 Triumph and Transformation in Biden’s Restoration of America: the American Rescue Plan

                  Songs of Darkness

June 27 2024 This Is Bullshit: the First Biden-Trump Debate of the 2024 Presidential Election

February 27 2024 Biden’s 2024 Electoral Campaign, A Referendum On the Idea and Meaning of Our Universal Human Rights and the Historic Role of America as Their Guarantor and a Beacon of Hope to the World: Case of the Uncommitted Protest Vote in the Michigan Primary

February 9 2024 Why Do I Write, and Why Am I Writing To All of You Here, in the Nakedness of my Life, my Voice, and my Truth, as America Begins Her Last Stand Against Fascism in the 2024 Elections

January 24 2024 Now Begins the Last Stand Against Fascism In America: Our 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, and Why I Am Voting For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For President of the United States

January 8 2024 We Descend Into the Maelstrom of World War Three, Having Abandoned Our Historic Misson As a Guarantor of Democracy and Our Universal Human Rights

January 4 2024 On America’s Complicity In Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes In Gaza

December 8 2023 The Fall of America as a Guarantor of Democracy and Human Rights

July 21 2024 Let Us Bring the Chaos: First Victory of the Resistance in Bangladesh

     Not yet a revolution, the Resistance to the Hasina regime’s tyranny of  institutional unequal power in keeping jobs within the elite military caste of descendants of soldiers of the War of Independence, has in the past several days achieved a number of victories since the seizure, liberation, and burning of the political prison in a stunning reprise of the Storming of the Bastille and the battles with police and military forces which followed, and forced the regime to reverse its policy.

     As Guillermo del Toro teaches us in Carnival Row; “Chaos is the great hope of the powerless.”

     Let us enact reversals of order, play tricks which open the gates of our prisons to paths of transformational change, pursue the sacred calling of the truth teller, perform the four duties of a citizen; question authority, expose authority, mock authority, and challenge authority, and let us bring the Chaos.

     Live with grandeur; so Jean Genet teaches us, and prescribes the embrace of our own darkness as a path of liberation in the discovery and performance of our true and best selves.

     We all of us who in refusal to submit to Authority become Unconquered and bring the chaos as Living Autonomous Zones must question everything, ourselves most of all, if we are to dream new possibilities of becoming human.

     A maker of mischief, I; who sabotages authority and systems of unequal power in any ways I can imagine and whenever possible as part of a sacred calling in pursuit of truth.

    Once as a prank while teaching American History in high school I switched the textbook, a compendium of national memory, identity, and authorized truth, with the alternative American history trilogy by William S. Burroughs; Cities of the Red Night, The Place of Dead Roads, and The Western Lands.  I was hoping someone would call me on it, but no one ever did, so I went right on teaching the whole semester how insectoid aliens from Venus secretly rule earth through the Algebra of Need and our addiction to wealth and power. I think we had more fun in American History class that year than is usual.

    If games of transgression, unauthorized identities, and transformation you would play, I invite you to play a game of chance with me. Write down six characters you would like to play, traditionally in chaos magic this would be three male and three female characters though clearly here as in life all rules are arbitrary and I encourage you to create your own and change them at random, and throw a six sided dice to choose who you will be today. No matter who you live as today, you will have five other possible selves in reserve, and tomorrow is another day and another throw of the dice. All identity is theatrical performance.

    Celebrate with me April Fool’s Day as a liminal and transformative time of exploring unknowns beyond the boundaries of the Forbidden, the defiance of authority, the sabotage of elite hierarchies of wealth, power, and privilege, seizures of power from systems of oppression and carceral states of force and control, the violation of norms, and liberation from other people’s ideas of virtue.

     By such acts we do give answer to the terror of our nothingness with the joy of total freedom.

      Let us run amok and be ungovernable.

     As I wrote in my post of November 25 2020, Using Chaos and Transgression as Revolutionary Acts to Transform Law and Order Into Liberty and Equality; I am against law and order because law serves power, order appropriates and divides us into hierarchies of elite belonging and categories of exclusionary otherness, whereas Chaos autonomizes and transgression empowers liberation struggle, delegitimation of authority, and seizures of power.

    Order appropriates; Chaos autonomizes.

    Let us restore the balance to systems of unequal power and unjust authority; for no inequality is fair, and there is no just authority.

     Rejoice with me in this time of reversals of order through the performance of Acts of Transgression and Chaos. Let us dance our best and secret selves on the stage of the world, forge new truths, destroy and create ourselves anew in the ways we ourselves have chosen, and transform the systems and structures of oppression and tyranny, patriarchy and white supremacist terror, forces of exclusionary otherness and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, into a diverse and inclusive free society of equals.

    Dance with us in joy, revolution, and the frightening of the horses.

    As I wrote in my post of April 1 2020, There Is No Return To Normal; There is no return to normal if and when the Doom of Man pandemic ends. Normal doesn’t live here anymore.

    Once there was an illusion of mirrors, echoes, distorted surfaces without meaning, hollow and beautiful like a gossamer web of lies and irresistible as a gingerbread house.

     It calls to us, this thing of no escape, this American Dream, with promises of wealth and the power to choose the condition of our own lives. Our songs are of meritocracy, upward mobility, and an inclusive society, but concealed within are harsh realities of unequal power and opportunity limited by authorized identities and divisions of caste or class, race, gender, faith, and nationality.

     We are lured with belonging and membership, but offered only identitarian tribalization and exclusionary boundaries of otherness.

     We are seduced with the guarantee of our right to the pursuit of happiness, but our society can produce only material diversions which commodify and dehumanize us.

     We are offered security from intrusive forces at the price of our freedom and equality, and submission to authority and tyrannies of force and control. And security is an illusion, often one manufactured through fear by those who would enslave us as a pretext for the centralization of power to tyranny.

     Throughout American history since our founding we have ever been a free society of equals, co-owners of our own government, each of us a king of his own life, but only on paper. The American Revolution has yet to be achieved; it is an ongoing process in which each of us must negotiate the alignment and boundaries between the ideal and the real.

     In this struggle we are the prize; our agency or enslavement, our authenticity or the capture and limitation of the possibilities of our identity, our liberty both as individuals and as interdependent members of humankind.

     And we must act now to save ourselves and our civilization, for we are running out of time. We are in a contest of survival against plutocratic corporate greed and our extinction as a species on one hand and against fascist tyranny and the fall of democracy and global civilization on the other.

     Let us free ourselves from the illusions of our normality.

     As I wrote in my post of October 30 2023 A Hymn to Chaos

    Tonight a window opens beyond our universe, letting angels through, or devils; and I welcome them both, figures of the twin sides of our nature and the limitless possibilities of becoming human, forces trapped within our flesh in titanic struggle or truths written in our flesh as transformative harmony.

    Herein is a liminal time in which we may shape ourselves anew, reimagine our lives and grow beyond the boundaries and limits of our horizon, explore unknowns in the unclaimed empty spaces of our topologies of human being, meaning, and value marked Here Be Dragons, discover new Best Selves and be reborn, become enraptured and exalted beyond ourselves as we ascend through the gaps of the heavens to embrace the wonder and terror of our total freedom in a universe bound by no Law and without any being, meaning, or value other than our own which we ourselves create.

     On this night in 2020 I put a curse on Donald Trump and all who voted for him in that election after four years of subversion of democracy and sabotage of America as a Russian agent and figurehead of the Fourth Reich, of white supremacist terror, patriarchal sexual terror, robber baron capitalism and ecological disaster which may include the extinction of humankind for the ephemeral profit of elites, tyranny and state terror in the brutal and criminal police repression of the Black Lives Matter protests, and a relentless multifront campaign against our ideals of liberty, equality, truth, and justice, and the institutions which serve them including a secular state, an independent and impartial judiciary, a free press and a press free from propaganda and disinformation, especially that of authorities and their carceral states of force and control, free from hate speech, conspiracy theories, rewritten histories, alternate realities; an open public forum of debate free from identitarian politics as fascisms of blood, faith, and soil and of fear and division weaponized in service to power, and an education system which produces citizens rather than slaves as a precondition of democracy.

     Curses and wishes give form and direction to vast imaginal forces of poetic vision as reimagination and transformation, and may change the balance of power in the world and the fate of humankind as an unfolding of our intention and the will to become. This one has been reasonably successful from my point of view; presaging the Restoration of America in the Biden Presidency and the exposure and purging of our betrayers from among us in the largest manhunt in our nation’s history as we bring a Reckoning to the fascist infiltrators of the January 6 Insurrection and their financiers and puppetmasters, and to all those who would enslave us.

    This year as I did last, and on every Halloween to come, for evermore, I shall perform the rituals of Cursing the Tyrants and the Casting Out of the Unclean Fascists that it may become final and eternal, propagating outwards into infinity as a wave of change and gathering force as it grows, like revolutionary struggle unstoppable as the tides; but I will balance it as well with a wish of blessing, protection, and good luck for all those whom Frantz Fanon called the Wretched of the Earth, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, and those champions who stand with them in solidarity and for a free society of equals.

     In this moment, with half the thousands dead in Gaza being women and children as well as civilians helpless before the bombs of vengeance as blood sacrifices to fear, rage, and hate, I know who my people are, and with whom I stand even if it is only to die with them.

     No one should have to die alone, abandoned and erased from history by a fallen civilization for whom our universal human rights and solidarity as each other’s guarantors of our humanity no longer has meaning or value.

     No Band of Brothers, we, but complicit in all evils we do not oppose or remain silent in witness of; especially we Americans whose taxes purchased the bombs of ethnic cleansing and genocide.

     Herein I claim both the peoples of Palestine and of Israel, versus the theocratic tyrants and terrorists on both sides who seek to subjugate them through fascist divisions of blood, faith, and soil and through fear weaponized in service to power. For the alt-right regime of Netanyahu has conspired with elements of Hamas in the October 7 attack for three purposes; first to stop the growing interdependence and mutual aid of the anticolonial Palestinian Independence movement with the Israeli democracy and peace movements which threatens authority in both Gaza and Israel and may yet emerge as a united and nonsectarian democracy, second to create a casus belli for Netanyahu’s conquest of the region including areas of Lebanon and Syria as a Second War of Independence, and third to delegitimize democracy as a guarantor of universal human rights by making its guarantor states complicit in unforgiveable war crimes in the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians by America’s client state of Israel.

     If America sends military aid to Israel rather than humanitarian aid to Palestine, the enemy regimes of Netanyahu and Hamas win, and the peoples of both states and our own lose.

     To refuse to submit is to become Unconquered, and this is a victory and a kind of power which cannot be taken from us, and through which we may find the will to claw our way out of the ruins and make yet another Last Stand.

     How do we create ourselves anew and emerge from the legacies of our histories?

      As I wrote in my post of May 28 2023, The True and False Crows: a Fable; A crow confronts his image in a pool of water, and as Nietzsche warned the darkness looks back. Of this I have written a paragraph on the Nietzschean idea of the Abyss, and of tragedy as failure to embrace our monstrosity and those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh; the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves.

      As Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil goes.; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

      It is also an origin of evil as the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; written in the tyrannies and systems of unequal power which hold humankind in their iron grip of force and control as Kristevan abjection and learned helplessness, and the ecological catastrophe which threatens our species extinction as disconnection from nature, control of nature as capitalist exploitation of resources and theft of the commons, carceral states of force and control as embodied violence, and our falsification, commodification, and dehumanization through the Wilderness of Mirrors.

     All of this requires the renouncement of love, as Wagner’s figure of tyranny Alberich the Dwarf must do to seize the Ring of power and dominion, a story more familiar to us as Tolkien’s retelling of the Nibelungenlied in his trilogy of novels which recast World War Two as an allegory of the abandonment of addiction to power. This has a corollary; the redemptive power of love, like the power of poetic vision to reimagine and transform ourselves, can free us from the Ring of Power and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     As written by Jean Genet in Miracle of the Rose; “A man must dream a long time in order to act with grandeur, and dreaming is nursed in darkness.”

     Here follows the paragraph of my thoughts on seeing this image, which if considered as a poem I now think of as the True and False Crows: a fable.

     Who is this imposter? If he is me, where now am I? Avaunt, my nemesis, for I shall pursue retribution for this theft of myself beyond all wrath now remembered, through death and hell and the terrors of our nightmares. Come and let us grapple for the truth of ourselves in this place where angels fear, and end not in silence but in exaltation and fire, with roars of defiance hurled against the chasms of our nothingness, supernal and magnificent as the Morningstar, and illuminate for all humankind the path of escape from this prison of illusions and lies. 

     To this my sister replied, Such poetry!

    This is as direct as I can be, o my sister. Should I merit some kind of monument one day, an absurd fantasy as I mean nothing to history and will vanish from the world without a trace, and nothing to anyone beyond yourself as the remnants of family, Dolly as my partner, and those few friends and allies who know my true identity, inscribe this therein.

     I have tried to salvage something of our humanity and to become a fulcrum and change the balance of power in the world these past forty years since I was sworn to the oath of the Resistance by Jean Genet, and often failed, but this is not what is important.

     What is important is to refuse to submit.

     And one thing more; to act with solidarity in revolutionary struggle. As the Oath of the Resistance created in Paris 1940 by Jean Genet from the oath of the Foreign Legion in which he once served, and given to me in Beirut 1982 in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a Last Stand beyond hope of victory or survival, and which I offer to all of you as a tradition to bear forward into the future; “We swear ourselves to each other, to resist and cease not, and abandon not our fellows.”

     In this my chosen life mission I have held true, for if each and every one of us stands in solidarity with others regardless of how different they may be from ourselves, we will become liberators and guarantors of each other’s uniqueness, and in refusal to submit will be victorious and free.

     He said it was the finest thing he ever stole, the Oath of the Resistance, but I often think of this in terms of a definition of the beauty of human beings; to become Unconquered and free as self created beings in refusal to submit to authority and its instruments of violence, force and control, and the repression of dissent, to refuse our dehumanization and the theft of our souls and autonomy and to do all of this in solidarity and absolute loyalty to each other.

    As he once said to me; “Is this not the beauty of men, to resist and never yield, to cede nothing to the enemy, not love nor hope, not our history nor the chance for a future of our own choosing, neither our monstrosity nor our grandeur, nothing of our humanity nor of any human being whose life is in our power to harm or help, to live beyond all limits and all laws and to risk everything to do this for each other?”

    I dream of a future something like the future envisioned by Gene Roddenberry in Star Trek. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations; the idea first put forth in the episode Is There In Truth No Beauty?, described in the first issue of the fanzine Inside Star Trek as; “that beauty, growth, progress — all result from the union of the unlike. Concord, as much as discord, requires the presence of at least two different notes. The brotherhood of man is an ideal based on learning to delight in our essential differences, as well as learning to recognize our similarities.” As stated in the episode The Savage Curtain; “I am pleased to see that we have differences. May we together become greater than the sum of both of us.”

     Liberty as freedom from authorized identities and truths, and equality and its corollary solidarity; these are the personal and social preconditions of democracy as a free society of equals.

    With all of the horrors I have witnessed in a life lived in the unknown spaces of our maps of becoming human marked Here Be Dragons, beyond the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden, through wars and revolutions  as a maker of mischief for tyrants and a monster who hunts other monsters for the chance to salvage something of our humanity, though in this I often fail as I did last spring in Mariupol and in the year of the fall of Afghanistan, regardless of the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, something in us refuses to submit to the abjection and learned helplessness of authoritarian systems and reaches toward exaltation and freedom. Whether such hope is a gift or a curse remains for each of us to discover in how we live our lives.

     In this I speak to you of truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh; we must embrace our darkness and claim our truths, and celebrate what Walt Whitman called the songs of ourselves as victorious seizures of power, freedom, and joy.

     Love and desire are innate capacities of reimagination and transformative rebirth, which like Dorothy’s magic ruby slippers cannot be taken from us and bear the power to send us home to our heart’s desire, to restore to us the self  which is truly ours.

      My flesh is a map of private holocausts, written with silent screams, nameless loves, causes lost and won, ephemeral signs of our secret histories and the lies and illusions which capture and distort our images in a wilderness of mirrors and the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.

     We have but one escape from the limits of our flesh and the flags of our skin; and this is love. In love we transcend ourselves and become exalted; through the redemptive power of love we may heal the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     Love is crucial both to poetic vision and as solidarity in action as processes of self-construal and becoming human; Siegfried walks through the fire and becomes human. There’s a good retelling of it in Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s musical episode, Once More With Feeling; plus it contains a marvelous re-enactment of the myth of Persephone.

     Let us always take the risks of our humanity, and place our lives in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.

     In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

     My friends, please feel free to perform and enact this spell with me; A Hymn to Chaos and Transgression:

     I invoke Chaos, freedom, and the limitless possibilities of becoming human against Order, Authority, and the boundaries of the Forbidden.

    I perform acts of transgression by which to break the chains of law and illusion woven by those who would enslave us, to seize our power and our autonomy from hierarchies of elite wealth, power, and privilege, from authorized identities and divisions of exclusionary otherness, to create myself in the image of my own imagination and no other, and to shape human being, meaning, and value to the forms of my desires.

     In this time of the turning of the tides I refuse and resist subjugation by force and control, I become Unconquered and free, I run amok and am ungovernable, and to Authority I reply with the Four Sacred Acts in pursuit of Liberty and Truth; Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

     By these invocations of Chaos and Transgression (Herein be free to make wishes, and to consecrate acts of defiance of tyranny, disruptions and subversions of good order and discipline, violations of normality, seizures of power, and celebrations of autonomy and living beyond all limits in the glorious embrace of our monstrosity, of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves) I curse all fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, patriarchy, state terror and tyranny, elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and inequalities of power.

     On this night of the renewal of the world in which the old order is consumed in fire and the spirit world moves among us and is unified with our own in its reimagination and transformation, I name to my brothers and sisters of Chaos these enemies of humankind as rightful prey; first, upon all tyrants and their forces of repression of dissent and enforcement of the Law, for order appropriates, law serves power, and there is no just authority; second upon Donald Trump (herein please feel free to name tyrants whom you oppose and seek to cast down from their thrones; mine include Vladimir Putin, Benjamin Netanyahu, and many others) and all who serve and support him and the cause of fascism, and all those who in voting for him in the Presidential election of November 3 2020 have signed the confession of their treason and allegiance to white supremacist terror, Gideonite patriarchal sexual terror,  and to the tyranny and terror of a police state.

     So upon Trump, his puppetmaster Vladimir Putin, and all who claim him as their own do I place my curse and invoke ruin upon their fortunes and their lives and destruction upon their cause. May they be forgotten and become nothing.

     This I balance with equal blessing, protection, and good luck upon the lives, fortunes, and causes of liberty and equality upon all who are powerless and dispossessed, marginalized by exclusionary otherness, falsified, commodified, dehumanized, silenced and erased, and those who place their lives in the balance with them in solidarity as champions and bearers of the Torch of Liberty and a free society of equals.

     Tonight our wildness will eat the moon and set it free.

     As written by Hannah Ellis-Petersen in The Guardian, in an article entitled National curfew imposed in Bangladesh after student protesters storm prison:

Army to be deployed to keep order after demonstrators free hundreds of prisoners and country is hit by serious unrest; “The Bangladeshi government has declared a national curfew and announced plans to deploy the army to tackle the country’s worst unrest in a decade, after student protesters stormed a prison and freed hundreds of inmates.

     “The government has decided to impose a curfew and deploy the military in aid of the civilian authorities,” a government spokesperson said late on Friday.

     AFP reported that at least 105 people have died in the unrest, which poses an unprecedented challenge to the government of Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister, after her 15 years in office.

     Earlier on Friday, a communications blackout was imposed across the country, with mobile internet access and social media blocked by the government.

     TV news channels were off air after the state broadcaster’s headquarters in Dhaka was stormed and set alight by protesters, and several news websites were down.

     A group of protesters stormed a jail in Narsingdi, a district just north of the capital, and freed its inmates before setting the facility on fire. According to Agence France-Presse, hundreds of inmates were released.

     Key government websites, including that of the central bank, the police and the prime minister’s office, also appeared to have been hacked by a group calling itself “THE R3SISTANC3”. A message posted across the prime minister’s office website on Friday called for an end to the killing of students, saying: “It’s not a protest any more. It’s a war now.”

     Another message posted on the website read: “The government has shut down the internet to silence us and hide their actions. We need to stay informed about what is happening on the ground.”

     The protests began this month on university campuses as students demanded an end to a quota system that reserves 30% of government jobs for family members of veterans who fought in Bangladesh’s war of independence in 1971.

     Those protesting have argued that the policy is unfair and discriminatory as young people struggle for jobs during an economic downturn and instead benefits members of the ruling Awami League party, which is led by the Hasina.

     Pro-government student groups have been accused of attacking the protesters, and police have routinely fired teargas and rubber bullets into the crowds, leaving thousands injured and dozens killed.

     Despite the ban on public rallies and gatherings, student groups still took to the streets on Friday. The sounds of gunfire and stun grenades could be heard coming from areas close to universities in Dhaka. According to reports, police were seen firing live ammunition to break up demonstrations and protesters accused police of being responsible for a large proportion of the fatalities.

     Witnesses said the protests had begun to take on a much broader anti-government tone against Hasina and her party, with slogans calling her an “authoritarian dictator” and demanding her resignation.

     Hasina has ruled since 2009 and overseen a vast and severe crackdown on political opponents and critics while corruption has flourished. Critical figures are routinely picked up in “enforced disappearances” by paramilitary forces and tens of thousands of political opponents have been jailed. She won a fifth term in January in an election widely documented as being heavily rigged.

     Clashes between heavily armed riot police and protesters, many wielding batons and bricks, have spread across the country, with vehicles set ablaze in the streets and thousands left injured. On Thursday protesters stormed the headquarters of the state broadcaster, Bangladesh Television, and set it on fire. Authorities said the building was safely evacuated.

     The Dhaka Times said one of its reporters, Mehedi Hasan, was killed while covering clashes in the capital.

     Access to social media was restricted after the telecommunications minister, Zunaid Ahmed Palak, said it had been “weaponised as a tool to spread rumours, lies and disinformation”.

     Hasina, 76, ordered that all universities and colleges be shut indefinitely after the clashes. In a speech on Wednesday night, she had condemned the “murder” of students killed in the protests and promised justice, telling students to wait for an supreme court order on the quota system, but it did little to quell the unrest.

     The prime minister was earlier accused of inflaming tensions after she defended the quotas and appeared to refer to protesters as “razakars”, a derogatory slur meaning those who betrayed the country by collaborating with the enemy, Pakistan, during the war of independence.

    The quotas that sparked the protests were abolished in 2018 but brought back last month after a court ruling, prompting outrage among students. About 40% of young people in Bangladesh are unemployed as the economy has foundered post-Covid, and government jobs are seen as one of the few means of secure employment. Young people say the quotas make it very difficult to get the jobs on merit.

     Hasina’s party, which was set up by her father, who led the independence fight for Bangladesh, is accused of disproportionately benefiting from the system.

    Pierre Prakash, the Asia director of the International Crisis Group, said the protests were a reflection of growing frustration on the streets at the erosion of democracy and the country’s economic distress, which has led to high inflation and rising unemployment.

     “The protests reflect deep political and economic tensions in Bangladesh. For several years Bangladesh’s economy has been struggling and youth unemployment is a serious problem,” he said. “With no real alternative at the ballot box, discontented Bangladeshis have few options besides street protests to make their voices heard.”

     Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for the UN secretary general, said they were following developments in Bangladesh and urged restraint on all sides.”

     All of this is wonderful, but there remain deeper and more profound underlying causes of inequality, and the Hasina regime’s creation and enforcement of a de facto aristocracy as an inherited military elite was only the most hideous example.

     The Revolution in Bangladesh has only just begun.

     As I wrote in my post of January 23 2023, Tyranny, Terror, and Resistance in Bangladesh; Mass elections and democracy protests against a tyrannical regime of brutal police repression have been gathering tidal momentum in Bangladesh for some while now, made ambiguous and complex by the pervasive terror of ISIS and its affiliates and ideological factions and their relationship with a regime which both fights against them and uses them as deniable assets in the centralization of power and subversion of democracy.

    In Bangladesh, those who would enslave us have no need to invent bogeymen, for the perpetrators of sectarian terror demonize themselves gladly. A truly aberrant and despicable enemy which is an alien intrusive force is a great gift to a police state.

     It is also extremely dangerous; the probabilities of such a scheme rebounding on its instigator in hideous ways approaches one hundred percent.

     To anyone who wishes to play the Great Game, I give this caution; those who ride whirlwinds cannot know where they may arrive in the end.

     A splendid truth from my perspective and for all revolutionaries and those who love liberty and hunger to be free, for if authority in its madness of power and need for control unleashes the Chaos as a space of free creative play and a window of opportunity for change, undoing itself as a mechanical failure from its own internal contradictions, all things become possible.

     Hasina’s puppetmastering of ISIS has linked the state to an implacable enemy it cannot control, and when it begins to wag the dog one of them will fall.

      In that Defining Moment of a nation and Rashomon Event of transformative change, we must be ready to balance the nightmare of theocratic tyranny and terror with the dream of a free society of equals.

     So for internal destabilization and subversion; Bangladesh also faces external threats, mainly from China as imperial conquest and dominion.

      China whispers of power to the Hasina regime, offering to underwrite its transformation into a totalitarian state with the poison pill of its gifts, a Trojan Horse strategy of soft conquest of the Indian subcontinent and its nations, among other targets of the Belt and Roads plan. China conquered Nepal and now rules it as a client state, seeks opportunity throughout the Central Asian nations of the old Silk Road, and currently controls a third of India itself through the Naxalite rebellion; the capture of Bangladesh would be pivotal to its long range imperial plans to conquer all of Central and South Asia and the Pacific Rim. This is the pull force at work in this arena.

     Then we have the push forces; the de facto hegemony of ISIS and sectarian fundamentalism which is now a law unto itself and answerable to none, and the example of the Rohingya as an existential threat weaponized in service to power, both that of ISIS and the carceral state of force and control which is Bangladesh.

     Here as always, everywhere, we must free ourselves from the legacies of our history in order to seize our power and be free.

     As written of the December election protests by Deutsche Welle in MSN, in an article entitled Thousands protest in Bangladesh against the ruling party; “Saturday’s protests come after a group of Western embassies called on the government to respect freedom of expression. Protests called for by the opposition party have been ongoing for weeks. Thousands of opposition protesters took to the streets in Bangladesh’s capita Dhaka on Saturday, calling for the government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to resign and install a caretaker government until elections are held in 2024.

     Protesters mostly support the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which is headed by the country’s former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia.

     Seven BNP members of parliament announced their resignations during the protest.

     Protesters made it to Golapbagh in Dhaka on Friday night despite tight security. Opposition activists chanted slogans including “Down with Hasina” and “We want a fair election,” the AP reported.

     Why are the protests taking place?

     Protests have been on the rise in recent months across Bangladesh, with protesters decrying power outages and the rise in energy prices.

     Saturday’s protests are essentially against Hasina and her ruling Awami League party, the BNP’s biggest archrival. The Awami League party was voted into power for the third consecutive time in 2018.

     However, the BNP challenged the results of the elections, accusing the Awami League party of rigging the vote.

     Zahiruddin Swapan, a former two-time opposition lawmaker and party spokesman, told AP, “We want a free and fair election. To facilitate that, this repressive government must go, parliament must be dissolved, and a new election commission should be installed.”

     He added, “They came to power through vote rigging and intimidation.”

    What do we know about the politics behind the protests?

     Saturday’s protests were further ignited by the arrest of two BNP figures the day before.

     The opposition party also accuses the authorities of arresting around 2,000 of its members and supporters since November 30.

      The rally on Saturday was the 10th since the BNP announced the launch of protests in 10 big cities across the country in September. Previous rallies have drawn significant numbers as well.

     BNP officials have claimed over a million supporters joined the rally, whereas police told the AP that the venue could not host more than 30,000 individuals.

     Eyewitnesses reported around 100,000 individuals in attendance.

     The ruling party and Hasina have repeatedly dismissed the BNP’s demand to install a caretaker government, saying it is against the state’s constitution.

     The BNP accused the government of orchestrating a transport strike to impact the protest turnout.

     A question of allegiances

     Historically allied with the US, the rule of Hasina has seen Bangladesh align with China more in recent years.

     China is funding several infrastructure projects in the country, worth billions of dollars, as part of China’s Belt and Roads Initiative. Critics charge the program is a debt trap for nations that sign on.

     Last Tuesday, the embassies of 15 Western countries, including the US and the UK in a joint statement, called on the government of Bangladesh to respect freedom of expression and the right to assembly, and to allow fair elections.”

     As written by Hannah Ellis-Petersen and Shaikh Azizur Rahman in the Guardian, in an article entitled “They beat me with sticks’: Bangladesh opposition reels under crackdown as thousands arrested: Police accused of shooting at activists and leaders of growing street protests against Sheikh Hasina’s draconian government: “It was a warm afternoon in May 2020 when Ahmed Kabir Kishore, dozing lazily, awoke to 20 men breaking down the door of his apartment in Dhaka, Bangladesh. With guns waved in his face, he was dragged to a van outside. “Move away, we have arrested a terrorist,” he heard them shout at the crowds.

     Kishore was not a terrorist. He was a cartoonist whose political drawings, published in prominent Bangladesh newspapers and magazines, took a critical view of the alleged corruption, human rights abuses and mishandling of the Covid pandemic by the government, led by prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

     For three days, he was kept blindfolded and handcuffed in a tiny room. Then the interrogation and torture began. “They beat me all across my body using sticks,” said Kishore. “They made me lie down and beat my feet.”

     The plainclothes officers questioned him about his connections to several journalists, hitting him so hard that his eardrum ruptured and he could barely walk.

     When the blindfold was removed, Kishore understood with dread that he was in the hands of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the elite anti-terrorism unit of the Bangladesh police, which has become notorious as a “death squad” and has been sanctioned internationally for its involvement in extrajudicial abductions, abuses and killings.

     On 5 May 2020, Kishore, whose wounds had begun to go septic, was handed to police and sent to Dhaka central jail. Alongside 11 others, including journalists and activists, he was charged under the Digital Security Act, ostensibly for spreading misinformation about Covid. Human rights groups claimed the law was a brazen attempt to silence government critics and criminalise dissent.

     For almost a year, Kishore remained behind bars, growing weaker from his injuries. But after a fellow detainee, journalist Mustaq Ahmed, died in prison nine months later – allegedly from his torture wounds – and global outrage followed, Kishore was granted bail in March 2021.

     After attempts were made to detain him again, Kishore fled to Nepal and on to Sweden, where he has lived in exile ever since. “I still cannot walk properly due to my injuries and I have lost hearing in the right ear,” he said.

     The ordeal endured by Kishore, Ahmed and countless activists, writers, artists, opposition politicians and lawyers since Hasina came to power in 2009 has formed the basis of the anti-government protest movement that is swelling in Bangladesh’s biggest cities.

     Economic hardship and rising fuel and food prices caused by the Covid pandemic and Ukraine war, coupled with frustration at a decade of alleged corruption, human rights abuses and rigging of elections, have driven hundreds of thousands to the streets for protests organised by the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and allies.

     Critics of Hasina and her Awami League government fear that elections due at the end of the year will be neither free nor fair – polls in 2014 and 2018 were marred by opposition boycotts and credible allegations of vote stuffing. They are demanding she resign and make way for a caretaker government. The BNP says it won’t take part in another election under Hasina.

     The response from Hasina, daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who led the country to independence in 1971, has been draconian. While the Awami League is free to hold vast gatherings, BNP rallies have been denied permission and transport strikes have been imposed to stop people attending.

     Police are accused of a coordinated campaign of violence against the opposition. Officers have fired on peaceful protests, killing eight BNP activists and injuring more than 200 protesters in the past five months. At least 20,000 cases have been filed against BNP supporters, while more than 7,000 BNP members and activists have been arrested, including prominent party leaders, including more than 1,000 detained just in the last month.

     “In the past, they used to carry out extrajudicial killings in staged gunfights at night; now they are killing in broad daylight. No one can hope for a free and fair election in this situation, under this government,” said AKM Wahiduzzaman, a BNP leader.

     During Hasina’s 13 years in power, Bangladesh has thrived as one of the fastest-growing economies in Asia, becoming the main supplier of garments to the west. However, the period has also seen authoritarianism and human rights abuses at the hands of the state, particularly by the RAB. Last year, the US sanctioned six RAB commanders for alleged extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances.

     Zakir Hossain, 37, a former army major, was among those “disappeared” by the RAB in December 2011. After more than 50 officers seized him from his home, he was interrogated, tortured and accused of planning a coup against Hasina’s government.

     “During the detention I received inhuman treatment that can only be compared to those horrifying stories of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay,” he said. He was kept in solitary confinement for almost three years, and for 11 months in jail before he was finally released, never having faced a courtroom for his alleged crimes. In 2021, he fled to the UK. “I am thankful to God that I am still alive,” he said.

     Despite the US sanctions a year ago, human rights groups say the RAB is still involved in such abuses, and at least 16 people were forcibly disappeared in Bangladesh. “The human rights situation in Bangladesh is appalling,” said Ali Riaz, professor of political science at Illinois State University. “The number of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances are blatant testimony to this.”

     As international pressure from the US, UK and others has increased on Hasina’s government, foreign minister AK Abdul Momen has rejected accusations of a crackdown on the political opposition. “Our government has always come to power through the fair electoral process,” he said, adding that forthcoming polls will offer “a free and fair election which will be acceptable to all”.

     However, Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman, liaison officer of the Asian Legal Resource Centre in Hong Kong, said that, in the current situation, “a fair and credible election is unimaginable”.

     “Bangladesh does not have an independent institution to hold the ruling party accountable,” he said. “The judiciary, the election commission, intelligence agencies, and the law-enforcement agencies all collaborate with each other to rig elections for the ruling party and hide the crimes of the regime.”

      As written by Emma Graham-Harrison and Saad Hammadi in the Guardian, in an article entitled Inside Bangladesh’s killing fields: bloggers and outsiders targeted by fanatics; “First they came for the bloggers, the atheists, the secular intellectuals. Then the three-year murder spree spread to aid workers, minority religions and Muslims who did not want their country reshaped by extremist Islam.

     The attack on Professor Rezaul Karim Siddiquee was so frenzied that its traces remain more than a month later, arcs of dried blood spattered up a pink wall and a pile of sand covering bloodstains that had pooled on the ground where the softly spoken lecturer was all but beheaded.

     He was killed on his way to work in the city of Rajshahi by four men who knew their target and his routines well. At least one of the killers was a former student who had a reputation for barracking the professor in class about the “immorality” of the English literature he taught, police believe.

    Neighbours in the narrow alley where Siddiquee was murdered overheard him greet someone moments before his death. “You’re here?” he asked his killer. His final words were spoken in surprise but not fear, because Siddiquee never imagined that he would be a target for extremists, his family says.

     The murder fitted into a pattern laid down over a gruesome three-year killing spree by extremist groups in Bangladesh: a bloody but brutal attack in broad daylight with the most basic of weapons, and later a claim of responsibility from Islamic State (Isis) or al-Qaida.

     But it was also a warning of the way the killers have expanded their campaign, from a focused assault on secular activists into a wider war to reshape Bangladeshi society along lines determined by Islamist extremists.

     Siddiquee was an observant believer who regularly attended prayers and even paid for the renovation of the mosque in his ancestral village – his was the most anodyne of public profiles. If he was a target, surely millions of other Bangladeshis are too.

     “What he was, we all are. If a person like him who loves to read, recite literature and play music at home can be killed, all of us are liable to be next,” said one of Siddiquee’s colleagues, asking not to be named for fear it could push him up a list of possible targets.

     Foreigners, religious minorities from Hindus to Christians, Muslims from other sects and even Sunnis who subscribe to a more generous vision of faith than their attackers, are all now at risk.

     Since 2013, 30 people have been murdered. They were from all faiths and social backgrounds, linked above all by the manner of their deaths, at the hands of men wielding machetes, knives and even swords. At least three others barely escaped assassination attempts, surviving with scars on their faces and necks that look like medieval battle injuries.

     One, Ahmed Rahim Tutul (pictured on page 15), survived only because he fell between a table and chair as a militant slashed at his head with a sword in an attack that left terrible scars across his face.

     The toll is tiny in absolute terms for a country of around 160 million people, and authorities insist they have the upper hand in the battle against what they describe as a relatively small, unprofessional band of fanatics, pointing to dozens of arrests. On Saturday, after the latest killing, security forces rounded up 1,600 people in a show of strength, although they admitted that only 37 of the detained were suspected Islamist militants, and the rest were petty criminals, AP reported.

     “If they think they could turn Bangladesh upside down, they are wrong,” prime minister Sheikh Hasina told parliament before the raids.

     But the brutality has thrown daily life out of kilter in disturbing ways, pushing the country towards the conservatism and religious monoculture that the attackers apparently seek.

     At the country’s second-largest university, where Siddiquee taught, professors are curtailing classes out of fear of their own students. Authorities have received a hit list of around 40 professors, and some have received threats by phone and letter.

     A week after Siddiquee’s killing, three men on a motorbike roared into the village of a Hindu tailor, Nikhil Joarder, hacked him to death and threw his body in a ditch. Again, they struck in the middle of the day, on a main road lined with shops and homes, but his former friends and neighbours all insist that no one saw the faces of his killers.

      The murder put an end not just to Joarder’s life, but to a long history of religious diversity in the village. Joarder’s wife and his brother’s family fled after the killing, and now the courtyard of corrugated iron homes that was the tiny Hindu enclave is locked and empty.

     “I came here for my security. I have nothing now,” said his widow Aruti Rani Joarder, weeping at a relative’s home in a nearby town. “This is not a safe country for the Hindu community.”

     Despite the government’s promise of swift justice and a string of arrests such attacks have, if anything, gathered pace. So far in June, four people have been murdered: two Hindus, a Christian trader and the wife of a senior police officer tasked with stopping militants, a cross-section of Bangladeshi society. As the list of victims has lengthened, so has the sense of menace across the country.

     The first attacks targeted only prominent secular intellectuals, a tiny and easily identified group. Few people are ready to take a prominent public stand against religion in a country where Islamist groups have deep roots and where there is a devout Muslim majority.

     After killers circulated the bloggers’ work beyond its original audience, outrage dimmed to apathy among many people, who considered the attacks reasonable punishment for what conservative Islam deems a capital crime. The nominally secular government did little to dispel the impression that the killings were disturbing but a minority concern. Hasina’s government is waging a bitter political battle against Islamist and conservative opposition groups, and is apparently unwilling to risk popular support with a fierce defence of unpopular radicals.

     Her government’s muted response to killings has been laced with insinuations that the bloggers contributed at least in part to their murders. “These attacks are not acceptable, but at the same time we expect people to stop criticising the prophet Muhammad,” said Shahriar Alam, one of the country’s junior foreign ministers, told the Observer.

     But the bloggers are now a minority among the dead, rendering pointless the calls for self-censorship. Spiritual leaders, foreign aid workers and ordinary members of minority religions appear to have been targeted more for what they represent than anything they have done, making the murders impossible to predict or prevent.

     One of the peculiarities of the killings in Bangladesh is that none has been claimed by a local operation. There have been no demands or ultimatums, or any explanation for why victims were targeted.

     That vacuum has been filled only by statements from Isis and al-Qaida, claiming responsibility for killings thousands of miles from their nearest known base, and made in Arabic, a language not widely spoken in Bangladesh except by religious scholars. A recent Isis propaganda magazine boasted an interview with a man whom they claimed was head of operations in Bangladesh.

     Analysts say it is extremely unlikely that Isis has set up a cell in Bangladesh. “It’s physically impossible for an organisation that is Iraq- or Syria-based to go somewhere so far away and launch operations,” said Kamran Bokhari, a fellow at George Washington University’s programme on extremism and an expert on South Asia.

     But the consistency and speed of the statements suggest there is an Isis link with killers in Bangladesh, perhaps through a member of the diaspora, turning the attacks into a propaganda tool for both parties.

     For local organisations, even a basic link-up with Isis brings extra publicity and possibly recruits, as well as the potential of hard cash. “You go from relative obscurity to an influx of tradecraft, maybe cash.”

     Such a connection may be deepened if the government cannot stop the attacks, as local groups gain a reputation and improve their operational skills. “If this cell doesn’t die down, how long are they just going to use machetes? They are going to get more confident, more emboldened,” Bokhari said.

     Hasina, who has insisted that the killings are part of a political campaign by local terror groups and fiercely rejects the possibility that al-Qaida or Isis have a foothold in Bangladesh, promised a stronger response after the latest attack.

     The man charged with responding will be police commissioner Monirul Islam, who broke up the cell behind some of the earliest attacks on bloggers and now heads a 600-man counter-terror police unit and says he is chasing two groups. The first is a sophisticated and well-financed operation that targets bloggers and secular activists in carefully planned attacks – a group once known as Ansarullah Bangla Team but recently renamed Ansar al Islam.

     Members arrested in connection with attacks include the son of a top banking executive, the nephew of a deputy minister, and a man who worked for multinationals including Coca-Cola. Commissioner Islam believes the group is still dangerous, and considers cracking it one of his biggest tasks. “They are the real extremist group: they follow the ideology of some global outfit, like al-Qaida, though they don’t have direct connections with them,” he said.

     The second network is responsible for most of the recent killings, Islam believes. A re-formed wing of local terror group Jaamat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), which set off bombs around Bangladesh a decade ago before being largely dismantled, it is now targeting Hindus, Christans, foreigners and Buddhists to send a political message.

     They are less sophisticated and less well-financed than the group pursuing bloggers, Islam says, which should make the killings easier to stop. At present, he believes, the group has just a few dozen members, and many have been rounded up already, or are on a “most-wanted” list.

     Among them are the men behind Professor Siddiquee’s murder, former students frustrated by classes on literature which they considered transgressive.

     “Two of his students were involved in this killing, former honours students,” said Islam. “One was very vocal in class, sometimes used to oppose the professor’s views, particularly during discussions on fiction and non-fiction. Eventually, he dropped out.”

     Even those most desperate for police to find the killers are unsure if the people they are arresting are the right ones. Siddiquee’s family and former colleagues say they want real justice, not simply detentions with few details and a legal process so glacially slow that the men accused of killing another professor in 2004 only came to trial this year.

     Analysts say there is a risk that police, who were criticised for brutality in the past, and who are relatively unfamiliar with tackling extremist cells, could resort to indiscriminate tactics. “They go around shopping people, beating people up – and they create further resentment in society by targeting the wrong people – there are lots of ideological extremists who aren’t terrorists,” said Bokhari.

     There is already concern about the death of a young student in custody, after he was arrested in connection with Siddiquee’s murder. Shortly after the killing, officers swooped on a working-class home near the murder site and picked up Mohammad Hafizur Rahman. He died in jail a few weeks later, and the family is still waiting for his death certificate.

     The first person in his family to go to university, Rahman was a second-year student in public administration, whose parents say he was devout but not militant. “He was the big hope of our family,” said Halima Begum, his mother, as she leafed tearfully through his graduation certificates from schools and madrassas, all boasting top grades.

     They believe that neighbours falsely accused him of a role in the killing as part of a feud, and they say Rahman was ready to wait out a process which he assured them would end with his innocence being vindicated.

    He suffered from the blood disorder thalassaemia, and police said he died from natural causes, although officers struggled to explain the lack of a death certificate.

     “It’s not what people say, a death in police custody; he was well taken care of by the doctors in the jail hospital,” said local police chief Sardar Tamizuddin Ahmed, who added that Rahman had not been a key suspect. “It’s not that he was involved, but there are sometimes many sorts of information that help investigating the case.”

     His relatives are careful to say that they do not blame the police for his death,    but they insist he had all the medicines he needed for his condition. They also say there were large unexplained welts on his waist when his body was returned to the family, and they question why they are still waiting for a death certificate.

     “Each day we ask for it and they give us a different reason not to issue it. They know my brother is innocent, he has no crimes committed, that’s why they are delaying,” said Habib Rahman. In an indication of official attitudes to police brutality, minister Alam said he had no concerns about either the death, or the potential loss of a key witness.

     Tensions are now so high in Rajshahi that police wait at the airport to offer permanent armed escorts to any foreigners flying into town.

     On a sunset stroll beside the river Padma, Rajashi hardly seems a threatening place: friends, families and couples gather to gossip and take endless selfies, watching river dolphins tumble through the muddy waters and snacking on fruit.

     But barely a kilometre away, the blood stains in the alley where Professor Siddiquee was murdered are testament to a much darker side of the city – and a disturbing history of extremism – that authorities have been unable or unwilling to tackle.

     Its activists are so committed, according to police and other officials, that decades ago they ensured that they married into families based near the university to secure a long-term base.

     Such historical allegations are difficult to verify, but one of the many unsettling facts about Siddiquee’s death is that it was not the first such killing: he was the fourth faculty member of Rajshahi university, one of the most prestigious in Bangladesh, to be murdered by extremists within a decade. In at least two other cases, student suspects were caught.

     “When they choose a victim, they choose always a person who is involved in a large community, [who is] educated and has a strong conscience,” said Ahmed, the Rajshahi police commissioner. “A teacher is an easy target for them, and when a teacher is killed there is a very big outcry.”

     Although individual terror raids or mass shootings have claimed more lives at schools and colleges in other countries over that period, and universities often become battlegrounds when nations go to war, for a country at peace, the rate of extremist assassinations – and authorities’ failure to stop them – is staggering.

     However, at the university there is widespread denial about the networks of radicalisation woven into campus life. Several professors insisted to the Observer that some of the earlier killings had been about personal and professional disputes, even as they admitted that they had altered their own behaviour and routines to guard against becoming a target.

    It is a form of self-protection for more than 1,000 lecturers who face an almost unimaginable risk but have received little support from security forces beyond a warning to be careful.

     Instead, they are watching their words even more closely than usual, and fear that fanatics who consider the education they offer to be too broad have made the first steps towards curtailing it.

     “I have become much more self-conscious in our classes, being sure not to offend any groups, and all the time repressing myself, my own free will,” said a second colleague of Siddiquee’s, who asked not to be named. “I take care again and again not to identify myself with the views in class, saying that this is the author’s view, not mine.”

     That creeping sense of oppression bothers most in the faculty even more than the threats to their lives. In response, they are demanding not greater security for academics, but greater police efforts to catch Siddiquee’s killers and dismantle the radical networks that fostered them.

     The roads through the university have been painted with demands for justice in English and Bengali, a giant noose because students and colleagues alike want the perpetrators hanged, and clenched fists of those who have vowed to fight for Siddiquee.

     The nervous university has banned his colleagues from setting up a platform in the gardens outside, which they hoped would serve as a memorial and focal point for weekly protests they plan to hold until his killers are found and brought to trial.

     However, authorities fear this would set a precedent. Too many professors have been killed for all of them to be given a rallying point.”

      As written by Saad Mamadi in The Guardian, in an article entitled Anyone could become a target: wave of Islamist killings hits Bangladesh. Spate of attacks on country’s prominent atheist and gay activists, bloggers and academics engulfs Dhaka; “There is an eerie feeling out on the streets of Bangladesh. To some of the city’s academics, activists and gay community, Dhaka now feels more dangerous than a war zone, after a spate of machete attacks by Islamist groups, including the murder last week of the founder of Bangladesh’s first magazine for the gay community.

     At least 16 people have died in such attacks in the past three years, among them six secular bloggers, two university professors, an Italian priest, two other foreigners working in the development sector, and a prominent gay activist.

     On Saturday a Hindu man, Nikhil Joarder, was hacked to death in the district of Tangail, central Bangladesh, with police suggesting his killing might be connected to a 2012 complaint claiming that he had made comments against the prophet Muhammad.

     Other targets have included high-profile cultural and intellectual figures, but also very private individuals, apparently murdered simply because Islamists objected to their lifestyle. The diversity of the victims, and the authorities’ sluggish response to the killing spree, have spread fear among anyone who identifies with those who have been killed.

     “I am more worried now here than I ever was in Afghanistan, where the threats were more of an existential nature,” says a gay American who has spent time in the war-torn country and now lives in Bangladesh. He asked not to be named.

     Among his friends to have died were Xulhaz Mannan, a prominent activist – founder of Roopbaan, the country’s only magazine for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community – and Mannan’s friend, Mahbub Rabbi Tonoy. Six to seven assailants pretending to be from a courier company forced their way into Mannan’s apartment and hacked the two men to death last week.

     Homosexuality is illegal in Bangladesh and many members of the gay community were already living in fear of being identified. Now they also have to fear for their lives – and the murders have in effect outed many young people by forcing them to change their daily routine.

     “The news of Xulhaz and Tonoy’s deaths has exposed many young gays and lesbians to their families before they were ready,” says a close friend of Mannan’s, who lives in the US and also did not want to be named. “I know of people not going to work for seven days, who have no hope of going back now.”

     Shockwaves from the killings went far beyond the gay or activist communities, reaching diplomatic and development workers. Mannan was a former employee of the US embassy and before his death worked at the US government’s development agency USAid.

     “They [militants] are really trying to get attention by striking against the people whose deaths would get [wide publicity],” says another US expatriate from within the gay community. “It makes me think twice about certain things,” he told the Observer.The attackers are also striking at Bangladeshi cultural and intellectual life far beyond the capital. Two days before Mannan and Tonoy were killed, two men on a motorbike drew up to a bus stop in the northwestern city of Rajshahi and hacked Rezaul Karim Siddique to death. Islamic State said that he had been killed for “calling to atheism”.

     Siddique was an English professor at Rajshahi University, a musician and a devout Muslim who had no political affiliation. An aficionado of the sitar, he donated to the mosque in his home village and had helped students at its madrasa, or religious school, according to Muhammad Shahiduzzaman, a professor of international relations at the University of Dhaka.

     “Anybody could become a target,” Shahiduzzaman says.

     Many of those now living in fear think that this was exactly the intention of the killers. Five grisly murders within a month have had a chilling effect across Bangladeshi society. “I have had to cut down on my presence in the civil liberty protests. It was not this frightening even a few days ago,” says Imran H Sarkar, the leader of secular activist group Ganajagaran Mancha.

     Responsibility for all of the attacks has been claimed either by Islamic State or Ansar al-Islam, a chapter of al-Qaida in the subcontinent, but Bangladeshi authorities have denied the existence of international jihadi groups in the country. They say the attacks are being carried out by homegrown militants with links to the main opposition party, who are seeking to destabilise the government.

     Regardless of who is behind the killings, they are a worrying sign of weakening political and security institutions, in a country of 160 million that until now has proved relatively successful in battling extremism.

     Bangladesh’s majority Bengali Muslim population has historically had relatively liberal values, says Afsan Chowdhury, a political analyst, but those traditions are now under threat. “Islamic militancy has been growing for the last 10 to 15 years as political institutions have weakened,” he adds.

     After the prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, held on to power in a 2014 election boycotted by the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist party and its allies, authorities arrested senior opposition leaders on charges of instigating violence.

     “The government has very effectively punished the opposition to the point they are not really a political force any more,” says Chowdhury. The vacuum of a strong opposition has made the atmosphere unpredictable.

     The spate of killings started in February 2013 after activists demanded that the government hang everyone convicted of collaborating with the Pakistan army during the country’s war of independence from Pakistan in 1971.

      Many of those brought to trial, in proceedings widely criticised by human rights groups for not meeting international standards, were linked to the opposition and its Islamist allies. One Islamist group, Hefazat-e-Islam, responded by drawing up a list of 84 atheist bloggers and demanding that the government take action against them for publishing blasphemous content online. At least five of the victims since 2013 were named on that list.

     But there has been little official support for others who appear on it, and families of victims and those at risk fear police investigations are too slow and ineffective. So far at least 46 people have been arrested, but only two have been found guilty; they were given the death penalty for their role in the killing of the blogger Ahmed Rajib Haider.

     “An arrest is not an assurance of justice,” said Sarkar, the secular campaigner.

     There is also frustration that some killers of Avijit Roy, a murdered American blogger of Bangladeshi origin, have been able to escape the country.

     Concerns about security are mounting from international quarters after the killing of Mannan. “The government will try to hunt down possible suspects [in Mannan’s killing] but whether they can really get at the actual culprit, there is a great deal of doubt,” Shahiduzzaman told the Observer.

     Survivors feel forgotten. Asha Mone’s husband, the blogger Niladry Chattopadhya, was hacked to death in front of her, but police have not contacted her in five months, she told the Observer. Officers said they had arrested five suspects in relation to the case.

     Many are also concerned that authorities who should be chasing the killers are instead blaming the victims. They point to a statement by Bangladesh’s police chief after the killing of Mannan, asking citizens to be aware of their security, and other comments by officials blaming blogger victims for writing about religion. “What upsets me most is how [the] government is now going out of their way to find other motives behind the murder,” says Mannan’s friend who lives in the US.

     Even if the authorities do step up efforts to find and prosecute the killers, the fear that has been created will linger.

     “I walk in the park every morning, and today a man came towards me carrying a knife. When he walked past me, I turned my head so I could check he was walking away,” says a gay expatriate living in the diplomats’ area of Dhaka.

     He could not shake off his fear, even when he later found out that the man was there to cut the grass.’

    And all of this sectarian religious terror and state terror is shadowed by the pathos of the Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, twice victimized; both driven from their homes in a wave of ruthless ethnic cleaning and anti-Islamic hysteria by the Buddhist fascist military junta of Myanmar, then exploited by criminal syndicates protected by the government of Bangladesh to whom they had fled for safety and the solidarity of Islamic peoples under threat from intrusive and reactionary forces who do not consider them fellow human beings. The horrific example of the Rohingya are a push force driving both radicalization and the centralization of power to a carceral state in Bangladesh.

     As written by Ruma Paul, Sudipto Ganguly and Krishna N. Das in The International Business Times, in an article entitled Surging Crime, Bleak Future Push Rohingya In Bangladesh To Risk Lives At Sea; “Mohammed Ismail says four of his relatives were killed by gunmen at the Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh between April and October last year. He recalls the September night when, he says, he almost met the same fate: masked men kidnapped him, cut off parts of his left arm and leg and dumped him in a canal.

     “They repeatedly asked me why I gave their personal details to the police,” Ismail, seated on a plastic mat with his left limbs covered in white bandage and cloth, told Reuters at the Kutupalong refugee camp. “I kept telling them I didn’t know anything about them and had not provided any information.”

     About 730,000 Rohingya, a mostly Muslim minority present in Myanmar for centuries but denied citizenship in the Buddhist-majority nation since 1982, fled to Bangladesh in 2017 to escape a military crackdown. Including others who migrated in prior waves, nearly 1 million live near the border in tens of thousands of huts made of bamboo and thin plastic sheets.

     An increasing number of Rohingya are now leaving Bangladesh for countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia via perilous boat journeys, as rising crime in the camps adds to longstanding troubles like a lack of educational and work opportunities and bleak prospects of returning to military-ruled Myanmar.

    Crimes recorded in the camps – including murder, kidnapping, rape, robbery, human trafficking and narcotics trade – have soared in recent years, according to data that Bangladesh police shared exclusively with Reuters. Murders rose to 31 in 2022, the highest in at least five years.

     “A series of murders of Rohingya men, including some leaders, at the camps have sparked fear and concern about militant groups gaining power, and local authorities failing to curb increasing violence,” said Dil Mohammed, a Rohingya community leader in the camps.

     “That’s one of the main reasons behind the surge in Rohingya undertaking dangerous sea voyages.”

    Police declined to comment on questions about Ismail or the issues at the camps beyond the data they shared.

     Data from UNHCR, the U.N. refugee agency, show that about 348 Rohingya are thought to have died at sea in 2022, including in the possible sinking late last year of a boat carrying 180 people, making it one of the deadliest years since 2014. Some 3,545 Rohingya made or attempted the crossing of the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea to Southeast Asian countries last year, up from about 700 in 2021, the UNHCR said.

     Ismail, 23, said he believes insurgents targeted him and his relatives, who were aged between 26 and 40, after his cousins rejected repeated approaches over the preceding three or four years to join a militant outfit, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA). The group has fought against Myanmar’s security forces and some Rohingya say it has been recruiting fighters, often through coercion, in the Bangladesh camps.

     In letters to the UNHCR in November and this month seen by Reuters, Ismail said he witnessed the killings of two of his cousins on Oct. 27.

     Reuters could not independently verify the deaths of Ismail’s relatives, but his account was corroborated by his brother, Mohammed Arif Ullah, 18. The UNHCR declined to comment on Ismail’s case, citing safety and privacy risks.

     About a dozen Rohingya men in the camps, who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal, said that ARSA militants, whose stated goal is to fight for and restore the rights and freedom of the Rohingya in their ancestral homeland, were involved in criminal activities in the camps, including human and drug trafficking.

     An ARSA spokesperson did not respond to questions Reuters sent by email and Twitter about the fates of Ismail and his family, and its alleged involvement in trafficking and attempts to recruit fighters in the camps. The group said on Twitter in December that its activities were confined to Myanmar.

     “Any crimes and incidents happening in the camps… in all such happenings, most of the time innocent Rohingya refugees from the camps are labelled as ARSA members and extra-judicially arrested by the authorities,” it said.

    The UNHCR acknowledged concerns about crime in the camps, saying it had increased its presence so that refugees could access protection and support.

     “Among the serious protection incidents reported to UNHCR are abductions, disappearances, threats or physical attacks by armed groups and criminal gangs involved in illegal activities,” said Regina de la Portilla, the agency’s communications officer in Bangladesh.

     Reuters could not independently obtain evidence of drug trafficking by ARSA, though previous Reuters reporting described how refugees had been drawn into the trade out of desperation.

     Accounts of violent crime in the overcrowded refugee settlements are adding to pressure on densely populated Bangladesh, which has struggled to support the Rohingya and has called for Myanmar to take them back.

     Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, Bangladesh’s Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commissioner based in Cox’s Bazar, said the government was trying to control crime, including through a separate police battalion posted to the camps, but that “criminals just flee across borders when we run an operation”.

     “For me, ARSA are thugs, hoodlums, hopeless people who now depend on drug peddling and extortion,” he said. “They don’t have a country, society, and nobody recognises them. That is why they are involved in crimes and life is meaningless to them.”

      Human Rights Watch said this month, in a report based on interviews with more than 40 refugees, that Bangladesh police’s Armed Police Battalion, which took over security in the camps in 2020, was committing extortion, arbitrary arrests, and harassment of Rohingya refugees. The battalion did not respond to emails seeking comment.

     Rahman said returning the Rohingya to Myanmar was the “only solution” to their problems. But Myanmar’s military junta, which took power in a coup two years ago, has shown little inclination to take them back. A Myanmar government spokesman could not be reached for comment.

     Ismail, who lives with his parents, wife and brother, says he fears for his life and understands why some Rohingya are fleeing Bangladesh.

     “It’s better to die at sea than being killed by terrorists or dying every day living in fear,” he said.

     The police data show that crimes in the camps and the number of Rohingya arrested in Bangladesh last year were 16 times the levels of 2017 – a significant jump even after accounting for the influx of refugees. Police arrested 2,531 Rohingya and registered 1,220 cases last year, up from 1,628 arrests and 666 cases in 2021.

     About 90% of cases last year, and a similar proportion of arrests, involved murder, illegal use of weapons, trade in narcotics, robbery, rape, kidnapping, attacks on police and human trafficking. Reuters could not determine how many of these resulted in convictions.

     The murders of 31 Rohingya marked an increase from a previous high of 27 in 2021. Related arrests reached 290, from 97 a year earlier. Drug-related cases and arrests also soared.

     Khair Ullah, a senior Burmese language instructor at the Development Research and Action Group, an NGO, said that besides concern about crime, the refugees were frustrated because about 90% of them had no education or employment.

     “They are worried about their future. They can’t support their old parents,” said Ullah, 25, who is Rohingya and lives in the camps. “What will happen when they have kids? The other big issue is that there’s no hope of repatriation from here, so they’re trying to leave the camps illegally.”

     Reuters spoke with several refugees who returned to the Bangladesh camps after abandoning journeys to Malaysia, via Myanmar, out of trepidation.

     Enayet Ullah, 20, who is not related to Khair Ullah, arrived in Bangladesh in 2017 with his family. In December, he said, he saw the bodies of two Rohingya men who had been killed in the area of the camps where he lives.

     “When I saw their bodies, I was traumatised,” he said. “I thought I could have died this way. Then I decided to leave the camp for Malaysia.”

     Taking a boat from Teknaf in Bangladesh with nine others on the night of Dec. 13, Ullah said he reached the Myanmar town of Sittwe the next day. He had arranged for traffickers to take him to Malaysia for 450,000 taka (about $4,300).

     “More Rohingya were supposed to join us and then a bigger boat would sail for Malaysia,” Ullah said. “They were waiting for a green signal to start the voyage. But my gut feeling was that the journey wouldn’t be safe.”

     He got cold feet and asked the traffickers to send him back to Bangladesh for 100,000 taka.

     Ullah laments that after more than five years in the camps, his homeland seems as far away as ever.

     “No education, no jobs. The situation will only deteriorate as time passes by,” he said.

     Those who reach Malaysia – where there are about 100,000 Rohingya – often find their situation similarly dire. Deemed illegal immigrants, many are jobless and complain of harassment by police. And the deteriorating political situation in Myanmar since the coup has dashed any hopes of repatriation in the near term.

     Mohammed Aziz, 21, said he pulled out of a sea trip to Southeast Asia after he saw pictures of boats that traffickers were using, and felt they were too small. He said he had to pay 80,000 taka for the trip to the Myanmar coast from Bangladesh and back.

     “People are risking their lives on sea journeys as there is no future here and criminal activities are rising,” Aziz said. “But I’ll beg them not to take this dangerous sea route. You can end up dying at sea.”

Walk Through the Fire, song from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, episode Once More With Feeling

A Crow Confronts His Image

Ring of Power: Symbols and Themes Love Vs. Power in Wagner’s Ring Circle and in Us: A Jungian-Feminist Perspective, Jean Shinoda Bolen

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/451808.Ring_of_Power?ref=nav_sb_ss_2_13

Powers of Horror: an Essay on Abjection, Julia Kristeva

http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/touchyfeelingsmaliciousobjects/Kristevapowersofhorrorabjection.pdf

Miracle of the Rose, Jean Genet

One of Us scene in the 1932 film Freaks

The American Trilogy, William S. Burroughs

https://www.goodreads.com/series/65214-the-red-night-trilogy

The Dice Man, Luke Rhinehart

Bangladesh’s top court cuts job quotas that led to deadly student-led protests

Court overturns ruling reserving 30% of government jobs for independence war veterans and their relatives

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/21/bangladesh-court-scraps-job-quotas-student-led-protests

National curfew imposed in Bangladesh after student protesters storm prison:

Army to be deployed to keep order after demonstrators free hundreds of prisoners and country is hit by serious unrest

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/19/bangladesh-imposes-communications-blackout-as-protest-violence-continues

Bangladesh police given ‘shoot-on-sight’ orders amid national curfew

Two die and thousands hurt in crackdown on Bangladesh student protests

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/16/two-dead-and-thousands-injured-as-bangladesh-police-crack-down-on-anti-quota-protests

One of Us scene in the 1932 film Freaks

The American Trilogy, William S. Burroughs

https://www.goodreads.com/series/65214-the-red-night-trilogy

The Dice Man, Luke Rhinehart

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/thousands-protest-in-bangladesh-against-the-ruling-party/ar-AA157yUk

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/22/bangladesh-opposition-crackdown-thousands-arrested

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/11/bangladesh-murders-bloggers-foreigners-religion

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/30/bangladesh-islamist-attacks-murder-gay-atheist-activists-dhaka

https://www.ibtimes.com/surging-crime-bleak-future-push-rohingya-bangladesh-risk-lives-sea-3660196

July 20 2024 No Pasaran! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Calls Out the Supreme Court and Draws a Line Against the Fascist Capture of the State and the Capture of Our Future By Our Past: the Indictments of Alito and Thomas

      Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez once again speaks truth to power in calling out the politization and kleptocratic graft of our Supreme Court in the indictments of Alito and Thomas, respectively a theocratic-fascist apologist whose mission is the subversion of democracy and the rule of law and the second an amoral grifter who sold himself and his nation to a Nazi plutocrat, overseer of the carceral state as embodied white supremacist and theocratic-patriarchal sexual terror.

     No Pasaran! A battle cry of freedom from the Spanish Civil War with which the historical counterpart of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez led the Resistance to fascism, as AOC calls out the Supreme Court and draws a line against the fascist capture of the state and the capture of our future by our past.

     This is not the first time she has done this, and we must support her in her Quixotic quest to route the windmills that might be giants in our imperiled Restoration of Democracy and in her sacred calling in pursuit of truth, for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has placed her life in the balance with ours and with those of the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, all whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth, and I ask now of all of you to join me in placing our lives in the balance with hers.

     In Solidarity of action and as a United Humankind, I will bet my life against any power on earth, any system of oppression, any means of force and control by those who would enslave us. This I say as a survivor of Last Stands at Al Quds, Rafah, and Beirut, in the victorious Red Sea Campaign counter blockade of the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid in the face of Biden’s savage and horrific drone bombardments, Mariupol, Panjshir against the Taliban after the Fall of Kabul, Sarajevo, the liberation of Srinagar during the 1990-1993 Indian Invasion of Kashmir, actions during the glorious Nepal Revolution, the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale which broke the Apartheid regime of South Africa, Guatemala during the Mayan Genocide, and countless others across over forty years of liberation struggle.

     United in Solidarity we can find the will to claw our way out of the ruins and make yet another Last Stand, beyond hope of victory or even survival.

     Nothing can stand against us if we but stand together; the great secret of power is that it is hollow and brittle, and finds its limit at the point of disobedience. 

      In the shadow of looming capture of the state by the Fourth Reich in our next election, possibly the last time any of us will have a meaningful vote if we allow division and ideological fracture to remove us as a blocking force for the rise of fascism as it did the IWW in America and the Democratic Socialists in Germany a century ago, let us demonstrate once again the principle of Solidarity as did Benjamin Franklin in reference to the legendary words of the Great Peacemaker Dekanawida who united the Iroquois before European contact; “One arrow is easily broken, but many arrows together are unbreakable.”

     Who refuses to submit to Authority becomes Unconquered and is free. This is the primary act of Becoming Human, defiance which confers autonomy, and like Dorothy’s Magic Ruby Slippers has the power to reveal our truths and cannot be taken from us.

      For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.

     As written by Amanda Marcotte in Salon, in an article entitled AOC understands the stakes: The “high crimes” of Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito must be prosecuted; “Corruption is one of those issues that tends to rile up political professionals and journalists, but not so much ordinary voters. Sure, everyday people don’t like it when politicians and other public officials have their hands in the cookie jar, but it can be hard to see how bribe-taking and favor-trading have a meaningful impact on the much-ballyhooed “kitchen table” issues. During focus groups, such as those shared on Sarah Longwell’s often-infuriating-but-always-illuminating podcast, voters often assume “everyone” in politics is corrupt. It doesn’t shape partisan preferences as much as one would hope. (Though there is evidence that corruption can suppress voter turnout over time.)

     In the past couple of years, there have been two dominant stories driving down the public’s respect for the Supreme Court: bad rulings and outright corruption. The latter has been a big deal in the press, because it provides all the aspects that make for exciting journalism: uncovering secrets, cataloging damning facts and, of course, exposing colorful details that make a story “pop.” Even if the dollar amount of gifts granted to Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are hard to remember, no one can forget those photos of Alito gloating over the fish he caught on his free luxury Alaska vacation or the original painting that was commissioned of Thomas hanging out with Harlan Crow, his billionaire benefactor.

     However, polling data suggests the soaring disapproval ratings of the Supreme Court owe more to their bad decisions, though stories about corruption are not helping. The public’s trust in the court started to tank especially hard after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the case that overturned five decades of abortion rights. That was a full year before the public learned that Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society had been introducing the justices to far-right billionaires, who would lavish them with gifts. But the loss of abortion rights, which directly affects the lives of countless Americans, has always been a parallel story to the Supreme Court’s corruption, without much effort by politicians or journalists to link the two stories together.

     In fact, the court’s corruption is deeply intertwined with the bad decisions that are inflicting harm on millions of people. This is why I was pleased to see Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. file articles of impeachment against Thomas and Alito this week, accusing them of “high crimes and misdemeanors” for hiding the millions of dollars of gifts received from billionaires. She’s also charged them for not recusing from election-related cases, despite substantial evidence that they and their wives have insurrectionist sympathies. Despite her strong social media presence and lefty credentials, Ocasio-Cortez has earned a reputation as a serious leader and not one prone to cheap political stunts. She wouldn’t be doing this if she weren’t serious, even though she fully admits it will go nowhere in a GOP-dominated House.

     It’s also a big deal, because Ocasio-Cortez is known for being a nuts-and-bolts politician. While she is conversant in more abstract topics, she’s celebrated for her skill at explaining, in an accessible way, how economic and health care policy impacts people’s lives. She has been one of the most effective elected officials speaking out against Dobbs, for instance. This is precisely why she’s the perfect person to take the lead in keeping the corruption story alive. She’s well-positioned to explain how elite corruption is a big reason why the Supreme Court keeps issuing dangerous opinions that hurt ordinary people.

     In her speech introducing the articles, Ocasio-Cortez drew a direct line between the corruption of Thomas and Alito and “the suffering of the American people.” She argued that we cannot “pretend that this corruption is wholly unrelated to the pregnant Americans now suffering and bleeding out in emergency rooms” because of the Dobbs decision penned by Alito. After all, Ocasio-Cortez noted, banning abortion was a “key political priority of these undisclosed benefactors and shadow organizations surrounding Alito and Thomas’s misconduct.”

     It’s likely easier for journalists and voters to see the direct link between the bribery-shaped behavior of Thomas and Alito and decisions that benefit businesses at the public expense. This term had many such decisions, most notably Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, in which the six conservative justices hamstrung the ability of bureaucracies like the Environmental Protection Agency to pass regulations. With so-called “social” issues like abortion rights, however, mainstream journalists still tend to act as if the justices aren’t being influenced by money and power to rule against human rights. For instance, Michel Martin of NPR recently asked Ocasio-Cortez if it’s possible billionaires are “giving them these gifts because they know [how] they’re going to vote on” issues like abortion rights, not as a way to influence their vote. As if a thank-you gift is somehow functionally different from a bribe.

     Ocasio-Cortez has a talent, however, for framing these issues in terms of class warfare that cuts through this kind of noise. In 2022, she had a memorable response to complaints that Justice Brett Kavanaugh had a fancy dinner at a steakhouse interrupted by protesters. She mocked him on Twitter with, “let him eat cake.”

     She has an intuitive grasp on the theme that ties all these various Supreme Court stories together: the right’s desire to replace equality under the law with an authoritarian two-tiered system. People like them get all the privileges and goodies, while the rest of us are left choking on air pollution and dying of lack of medical care. Members of the Republican elite, especially Donald Trump, are allowed to commit whatever crime they wish and get “immunity,” while the rest of us are criminalized for basic body functions like pregnancy or needing to sleep. The rest of us risk death from mass shootings because selling bump stocks makes Thomas’s rich buddies a little richer.

    Stated plainly, these links seem obvious, but it’s generally true that the material impacts of court corruption often fall by the wayside in these discussions. Earlier this month, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore. requested that the Justice Department open a criminal investigation into Thomas, out of concerns he’s committed tax fraud by taking millions in undisclosed gifts. A serious crime, but one that tends to read as “victimless” to most Americans. Both Whitehouse and Wyden are outspoken critics of the Dobbs decision, but they rarely link their concerns about corruption directly to abortion bans.

     The connection, however, is right there, if anyone wishes to look into it. Leo, the former Federalist Society head who has spent so much time setting up benefactor relationships between billionaires and the justices, also happens to be motivated by a frankly unhinged obsession with banning abortion. Reporting after the Dobbs decision shows that some of the conservative justices had been skittish about ending Roe v. Wade, but caved to pressure from Alito and Thomas to go as radical as possible. That level of conviction to strip basic rights from millions of women is a lot easier to maintain if your rich friends are telling you to stick it out, in between rounds of free caviar and another glass of outrageously expensive wine. Perhaps more than anyone else in Congress, Ocasio-Cortez gets that connection.”

      As I wrote in my post of July 2 2022, A Last Firewall Against Tyranny Or Its Trojan Horse: the Supreme  Court; We are confronted in this moment of the end of the right of bodily autonomy of women and the judgement of the Supreme Court that women’s bodies are property of the state, which steals from our citizens a whole nexus of interdependent rights, those of privacy, equality, autonomy, the meaning of citizenship, and the right to life as access to health care is a precondition, on the basis of law derived from the Salem Witch Trials and the weaponization of faith in service to patriarchal power and privilege, along with the sabotage of our right to life in ruling against gun control and environmental protections, an assault on our rights of judicial process in a blow against Miranda which threatens us with a carceral state in which purges and political crimes become a tool of repression of dissent, and the de facto end of the principle of separation of church and state in which our courts may now arbitrate personal faith.

     In all of this madness and sabotage of our democracy and its institutions, values, and ideals, one thing is clear; we must seize our justice system from capture by those who would enslave us. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has called it a judicial coup, and I believe this is the latest and most terrible existential threat of the Fourth Reich in its many attempts to engineer the Fall of America.

      And this we must resist. Let us give to fascist tyranny the only reply it merits; Never Again!

     Reform of the Supreme Court and of our whole system of justice has now become a matter of our survival as a nation, a free society of equals, and a beacon of hope to the world as a guarantor of democracy and our universal human rights.

     As written by Sharon Zhang in Truthout; “As the Supreme Court prepares to hear a case that could fundamentally change how elections are run in the U.S., Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) is sounding the alarm about extremist justices’ apparent intentions to stage a “judicial coup.”

     On Thursday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Moore v. Harper, a case in which right-wing plaintiffs argue that the North Carolina Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction to strike down gerrymandered maps that gave the GOP undue advantage in state elections. If the Supreme Court rules for the plaintiff, it could completely undermine the democratic process and empower politicians to draw gerrymandered election maps nearly unilaterally.

     In response to news of the Moore case, Ocasio-Cortez said that it is time for political leaders to take decisive actions to stop the far right Supreme Court from further eroding Americans’ rights.

     “We are witnessing a judicial coup in process,” she wrote. “If the President and Congress do not restrain the Court now, the Court is signaling they will come for the Presidential election next. All our leaders – regardless of party — must recognize this Constitutional crisis for what it is.”

     “At this point we should be well beyond partisanship,” continued Ocasio-Cortez. “Members of Congress have sworn an oath to the Constitution. It is our duty to check the Court’s gross overreach of power in violating people’s inalienable rights and seizing for itself the powers of Congress and the President.”

     In the wake of the most consequential and extremist SCOTUS term in modern history, Ocasio-Cortez has continually called for Democratic leaders to fight back against extremist Supreme Court justices with actions that meet the severity of decisions like the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

     Just in the past eight days, the Supreme Court has ruled to: (1) limit the enforcement of Americans’ Miranda rights; (2) shoot down a New York law that restricted the ability to carry concealed guns in public; (3) wrench bodily autonomy from millions of Americans who can get pregnant; (4) allow public school employees to lead students in prayer; and (5) severely limit the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ability to regulate greenhouse gasses.

     With the Moore case on the docket and extremist justices demonstrating their willingness to overturn long-held Court precedents, the Supreme Court’s next session starting in October is shaping up to be equally severe. Right-wing politicians have begun fantasizing about which rights they can target next since Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the Dobbs v. Jackson decision to overturn Roe that gay marriage and contraception should also be reconsidered in the wake of the decision on abortion rights.

     In response to these rulings, Ocasio-Cortez has called for Supreme Court justices to be impeached. Lawmakers have accused at least three justices of lying in their confirmation proceedings; Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett all said that they would be willing to uphold precedents like Roe. Lawmakers say those three justices essentially lied under oath in order to secure their spot on the Supreme Court. Ocasio-Cortez has also called for Thomas to be impeached over his wife Ginni Thomas’s ties to the January 6 attempted coup.

     “Catastrophic,” the New York progressive said in response to the Court’s EPA decision. “A filibuster carveout is not enough. We need to reform or do away with the whole thing, for the sake of the planet.”

     As written by Jonathan Cohn in Huffpost, in an article entitled It Took The Supreme Court Just 10 Days To Change America As We Know It,

     “The conservative majority seems out of step with the public’s values, in a way we haven’t seen in decades.; “The Supreme Court is allegedly the most passive, slowest-moving branch of government. But in a little more than one week’s time, the court has arguably rewritten as much American law as any Congress or presidency in recent memory.

     Just consider what the court has done since last Tuesday:

     ― It has invalidated gun restrictions in states that hold about one-fourth of the population and created a new constitutional standard for firearm restrictions that will make defending other limits (including parts of a new law that President Joe Biden signed last week) even more difficult.

     ― It has forced publicly funded school voucher programs to include religious establishments and required districts to allow coach-led, post-game prayers on the field, and in the process dispensed with a decades-old legal test designed to prevent official government endorsements of faith.

     ― It has ended the right to an abortion, effectively allowing the procedure to be illegal or nearly illegal across a broad swath of the country, while also rejecting the constitutional foundation of privacy rights that protect same-sex marriage and use of contraception.

     To put things a bit differently, the court has gutted limits on gun possession, severely weakened the wall between church and state, and taken away a right that has existed for nearly 50 years ― reinterpreting the First, Second, Fifth, Ninth and 14th Amendments in the process.

     And that was all before Thursday, when it finished the term by preemptively striking down new carbon emissions standards, thereby limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to slow climate change, on the basis of a principle that could dramatically reduce the government’s power to regulate everything from product safety to health care.

     About the only major issue on which the court hasn’t written new doctrine this year is race. And that will likely happen next year, when the justices take up cases that could end affirmative action and eviscerate what’s left of the Voting Rights Act.

     How you feel about these changes depends, obviously, on where you come down on issues like abortion, guns and school prayer. But it also depends on what role you think the Supreme Court should play in governing ― and more specifically, when it ought to be making the kind of sweeping changes it just unleashed.

     To answer that question, it helps to think about some key episodes in history and how they compare.

     In The 1930s and ’40s ― A New Understanding Of Economics

     One is the 1930s, when Franklin Roosevelt was trying to get the country through the Great Depression and an aging conservative majority on the Supreme Court was striking down key parts of the New Deal. They’d been ruling that way since the early 20th century, when they were invalidating economic regulations from the Progressive Era ― most famously, in a case called Lochner v. New York that struck down a state limit on the number of hours a baker could work in a week.

     The Lochner Court, as it came to be known, believed the right of private parties to make contracts was sacrosanct and interpreted the federal power to regulate commerce in the narrowest possible way. When FDR became president, the conservatives started throwing out elements of his agenda with the same fervor they had struck down reforms from when his distant cousin Teddy was president.

     The individual elements of the New Deal weren’t all popular ― or successful. But FDR had deep reservoirs of support with the voters, who were desperate for muscular government action in the face of an unprecedented economic crisis, and that support extended to his anger with the Court, according to Jeff Shesol, a former White House speechwriter and author of “Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt v. The Supreme Court.”

     “Roosevelt very much had the public on the side, whatever they might have thought about the [National Recovery Act] or whatever they might have thought about the [Agricultural Adjustment Act],” Shesol told HuffPost. “There was a mounting sense of crisis, and that the crisis was being created by the Supreme Court.”

     FDR was so frustrated he eventually proposed adding new justices to the Court, in what became known as his “court-packing” plan. Congress rejected the proposal resoundingly, but around the same time ― thanks to a change in sentiment by some justices and later some vacancies on the bench ― the court flipped and began recognizing much greater government authority to regulate the economy.

     In doing so, it was updating doctrine in a way that accommodated changing real-world conditions and brought old ideas into line with new public values.

     In The 1950s and ’60s ― A New Understanding Of Rights

     Something similar was happening in the 1950s and 1960s, when Earl Warren was the chief justice, and the Supreme Court began aggressively interpreting the Bill of Rights and Civil War amendments as providing guarantees of equality and liberty that previous courts had not recognized.

     The landmark ruling of that era, Brown v. Board of Education, prohibited racial discrimination in schools and was the first step towards fulfilling the century-old promise of equal protection for people of all races. It also had the support of a majority of voters from the get-go, according to Gallup’s polling.

     The revolution in judicial thinking continued into the 1970s, a period that included Roe v. Wade, the decision recognizing a right to abortion. The polling on Roe and abortion more generally has always been complex, but the best evidence suggests most Americans thought then that abortion should be legal at least some of the time, which is what Roe allowed.

     “The Supreme Court has not been this out of step with public opinion since the New Deal Court-packing fight in 1937.”- Barry Friedman, New York University Law School

     Whatever the specifics of the polling, the later 20th century rulings were another example of the Court rulings tracking broader, society-wide change in values ― in this case, growing recognition of racial minorities and women as deserving of the kind of fair treatment they hadn’t gotten before. And this is how most scholars have long understood the Supreme Court to operate ― by gradually, if haltingly, moving in tandem with changing public expectations.

     But the decisions this past week don’t fit that model.

     The decision on guns comes at a time when solid, consistent majorities want the government to do more to regulate firearms. The decision on abortion comes amid polling showing that large majorities wanted Roe to stay in place ― and who, if anything, are more supportive of abortion than they were 10 or 20 years ago.

     “The Supreme Court has not been this out of step with public opinion since the New Deal Court-packing fight in 1937,” Barry Friedman, a New York University law professor and author of a widely cited book on the subject, told HuffPost this week.

     In a key passage of the majority opinion overruling Roe, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that “we cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work” ― that the court’s job is to interpret the Constitution’s meaning, based on text and original meaning.

     In one sense, that claim is uncontroversial. The whole point of the judiciary’s structure is to let justices interpret the Constitution as they think best, especially when it comes to questions of individual rights, even if that defies what the majority of voters want. That’s why justices (and all federal judges) have lifetime tenures.

     But because interpreting the Constitution is so inherently subjective, the choice of justices is supposed to reflect the broader political currents of their eras. This is what was happening in the 1930s and 1940s, and again in the 1950s and 1960s.

      “All these cases are designed with a goal of rolling back legal developments that reflected cultural changes, societal changes over the last 50 to 100 years.”

  ​​     Five of the six justices who make up the conservative majority are there because of presidents who first got to the White House despite losing the popular vote. The recent ones are products of a Senate where the small-state bias gives conservatives disproportionate power. And that’s to say nothing of the way that the GOP Senate leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, broke with long-standing norms ― blocking President Barack Obama’s final appointment and then rushing through the last one of President Donald Trump’s term.

     “This is not business as usual,” Shesol said. “When that pattern is broken because of this act of legislative gamesmanship, and you have an unrepresentative branch of government ― the United States Senate ― confirming an appointment by a president who lost the popular vote, the court doesn’t end up reflecting the values it’s supposed to reflect.”

     Change any of those key events ― the presidential elections of 2000 or 2016, the blocking of Obama’s Merrick Garland nomination or confirmation of Trump’s appointment of Amy Coney Barrett ― and the legal landscape looks rather different today. Those state gun laws might still be on the books, the separation of church and state might look like it did before, and Roe v. Wade might remain the law of the land.

     “Our political system is rife with dysfunction, by not allowing the majority to have its way,” Friedman said. “And the appointments process is hugely broken, not distributing the ability to fill seats evenly among elected presidents.”

     In The Future ― A Court Of Uncertain Legitimacy

     If, like Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas and all of their supporters, you think the Constitution’s meaning clearly lines up with these recent rulings ― if you think there’s no right to privacy, and that the Second Amendment includes an individual’s right to carry firearms in public, and that the Constitution doesn’t empower federal agencies to regulate aggressively ― then the political conditions that created today’s conservative majority may not seem especially relevant.

     In fact, one way of looking at this string of cases is that they are an effort to tether constitutional law to a much older way of thinking ― one that prevailed when the public thought very differently about, say, the rights of women. “All these cases are designed with a goal of rolling back legal developments that reflected cultural changes, societal changes over the last 50 to 100 years,” Leah Litman, a University of Michigan law professor and co-host of the Strict Scrutiny podcast, told HuffPost earlier this week.

     But the Supreme Court’s legitimacy is fragile and relies on the public’s perception that it is fair and roughly in line with its values. Gallup last week found that only one in four Americans have a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the Supreme Court, the lowest it had measured in half a century.

     That was before the abortion ruling. It’s hard to imagine approval climbing now ― and easy to imagine it sinking even lower.”

     As I wrote in my post of December 9 2021, A Last Firewall Against Tyranny: the Supreme Court; Our last firewall against tyranny is our ideal of impartial justice and the right of a citizen to test the justice of a law in court, as embodied in our Supreme Court.

     How best can we guarantee our ideals and rights against the politization of justice?

     As this is now a political institution, why not limit terms to that of the appointing President? Because of the danger that the justice system can no longer check and balance the other two branches of government. We must find a way to keep that system to avoid the courts becoming a rubber stamp of policy, for the main way to test the justice of a law is by breaking it, to bring it to trial. Lose that, and we have show trials by phone call to authority, with no transparency, oversight, due process, or public control. The worst kind of power is secret power; ask any survivor of abuse.

     What can we do to salvage our justice system from becoming an instrument of tyranny?

     First, we could abolish the Supreme Court as an inherently undemocratic institution. We do have transitional options; change how the Justices are chosen, limit terms, and increase their number. 

     Change the method of selecting the Justices from Presidential appointment with Congressional confirmation to a simple plebiscite; one citizen, one vote. Why leave important decisions in the hands of authorities whom we know are untrustworthy and often owned by special interests?

     Actually, I think we should change Congress to a single legislative body elected by a simple proportional representation, one legislator for every one million voters representing districts drawn without regard to party, with messaging limited to free public air and internet time and no private funding. It would hand control of the government back to its citizens and protect us from special interests and corporate influence, and prevent hegemonic elites of white supremacist terror and patriarchal sexual terror from vote theft, forms of enslavement, and dictating to the nation from protected enclaves of wealth, power, and privilege. Our immediate goals in the revision of our system should include getting money out of politics and combatting racist vote suppression.

     We now have too few Justices who serve for too long; a life appointment is absurd. A decade is an enormous span of time today, in which much may change. We need reasonable term limits or we risk devolving into a government not of laws but of persons, wherein charismatic personalities may define the fate of the nation.

     And we must be wary of being trapped in amber as ossified forms unable to change and adapt to new threats and conditions, for agility is a key survival trait in both natural and political systems.

     We must also take proactive measures to ensure our ideals against subversion by the enemies of democracy, and federally enact into law any implied rights which are constantly under threat such as abortion and bodily autonomy.

     For action and further study of the problem, I refer you to the excellent Fix the Court site. Here are some of their ideas:

     “On transparency and media and public access; Supreme Court justices should continue livestreaming argument audio and include video, and end their demonstration ban on the front plaza. Access to federal court filings should be free.

     On term limits, Supreme Court justices should serve no longer than 18 years (this I would amend to six or eight years), after which they’d serve on lower courts and/or fill in on SCOTUS when there’s an unexpected vacancy. When the founders were drafting the Constitution, a primary goal was to shield the judiciary from the political pressures of the day. English monarchs throughout the 18th century were firing judges without cause, and the founders were hoping to guarantee some level of judicial independence from the executive.

     Today’s Supreme Court is not only highly political, it’s also polarized along partisan lines in a way that mirrors other broken political institutions. Our freedoms sit on a razor’s edge, with the percentage of 5-4 rulings under Chief Justice Roberts near an all-time high. A single justice’s vote holds the key on health care, voting, civil rights and religious freedom. (Here I suggest a consensus  model of decision making; all justices must agree unanimously.)

     With lifetime appointments, justices are free to push their personal, ideological agendas for decades with almost no accountability. So how can we move the court away from partisanship and closer to the founders’ intent? (My first choice is to change the absurd and overtly political method of Presidential appointment of justices to a general election.)

     One compelling answer is term limits, which would solve critical problems:

     Supreme Court justices now serve on average longer than at any point in American history (28 years) and are gaming their retirements. Life tenure gives justices the perverse incentive to stay on the court until a President with whom they tend to agree sits in the Oval Office, meaning some hold onto their seats past their intellectual primes and wait until the “right” person is elected to the White House to retire.

     Life tenure has turned nominations into a political circus. It’s no longer a priority to find the best candidate for the job who will serve with integrity and who has broad life experience. Instead, the party in charge scrambles to find the youngest, often most ideological nominee (who, at the same time, knows the right things to say at a confirmation hearing) in order to control the seat for decades to come.

     A single, standard 18 year term at the high court would restore limits to the most powerful, least accountable branch of American government. Each new justice would be added every other year, and since 9 (justices) x 2 (years) = 18, it’d take 18 years to reach the end of the cycle, hence 18-year terms. Appointments would become predictable exercises, not embarrassing partisan spectacles. (For myself, still vastly too long, an entire generation. Ten years is far too long. Why not simply rotate judges every two years by lottery or seniority and give our finest legal scholars a chance at the big game, then back to their usual court with the experience? It would build expertise.)

     On the question of a Code of Ethics; Supreme Court justices should be bound by the same code of ethics that all other federal judges are required to follow.

     On conflicts of interest, Supreme Court justices should not own individual stocks and should generally be more thoughtful about potential conflicts of interest.

     On transparency and financial disclosures, Supreme Court justices should submit consistent, detailed financial disclosure reports each year and publish them online like top government officials in the other two branches.

      On acting as agents of influence and use of authority in the public interest, Supreme Court justices should advise the public of their appearances outside of the court and allow media coverage for most of them.”

     As written in Business Insider; “The commission tasked by President Joe Biden with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court has released its final draft report, a cautious take on proposals for expanding the court and setting possible term limits.

     The 36-member bipartisan commission was not charged with making recommendations under the White House order that created it. As a result, much of the final report from the group, largely composed of academics who have been studying court reform and holding hearings, is context and history that may be used going forward in proposals to introduce changes.

     The panel, led by Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel for former President Barack Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a Yale Law School professor who served in the Office of Legal Counsel for Obama, cautioned that excessive change could potentially erode democracy further down the line.

     “Indeed, in recent years, we have seen democratic governments ‘regress’ or ‘backslide’ with respect to judicial independence,” the court wrote in its report released Monday. “This has come about through electoral majorities using their power to restructure previously independent institutions, including courts, to favor the political agendas of those governments.”

     The makeup of the Supreme Court has come into even sharper focus following a ban on abortions after six weeks in Texas and arguments last week on a Mississippi case in which the 6-3 conservative-leaning court signaled a willingness either to overturn or substantially roll back abortion rights enshrined in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision and its 1992 ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed Roe. A decision isn’t expected for months.

     The commission’s review was a campaign promise Biden made in response to pressure from activists and Democrats after the court’s composition tilted sharply to the right during former President Donald Trump’s term. He’s largely avoided the topic since.

     During the presidential campaign Biden repeatedly sidestepped questions on expanding the court, and he hasn’t said if he supports adding seats or making other changes, including imposing term limits. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday she had no timeline for how long it would take for Biden to review the report or what happens next.

     “It’s not recommendations that he either accepts or denies,” she said. “He asked this diverse group of experts from a range — from across the political spectrum, from across the viewpoint spectrum — to look at and assess a range of issues that have long been discussed and debated by court experts.”

     Trump nominated three justices to the high court, giving it the 6-3 conservative majority. Democrats were especially frustrated that the Republican-led Senate kept Obama from filling the seat left empty by the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016. Then, with Trump in office, the Senate pushed to confirm Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the court following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September 2020, weeks before the election.

     That led to calls by some progressives for changes, including adding seats to the court or setting term limits. Congress originally set the number of justices at six. The number has been nine since 1869.

     An earlier report by the panel spoke positively of the potential for term limits for justices. The final report builds on this, devoting a section to exploring the potential avenues to set term limits, discussing the possibility of justices retiring and also of allowing them a significant term before returning to their lower court.

     “Mirroring the broader public debate, there is profound disagreement among commissioners on these issues. We present the arguments in order to fulfill our charge to provide a complete account of the contemporary court reform debate,” the report says.

     It also substantially discusses the court’s role in the constitutional system, judicial ethics and whether the court should change its operations to be more public friendly. It specifically addresses the use of audio or video

streaming of oral arguments, acknowledging while justices are largely opposed to video, audio streaming that began during the coronavirus pandemic could be a way to enable the public to better follow how it operates.

     “The commission does not purport to offer a consensus history of the last decades of conflict over the Supreme Court,” according to the report. “Nor does it come to a conclusion about whether the court has suffered a loss or crisis of legitimacy. Commissioners hold very different views on these matters.”

     But there’s a growing urgency from some Democratic groups to make substantial changes.

     “The court has slipped irretrievably into partisanship, and there is only one solution to that problem: Congress must add additional justices to the bench to restore faith in the institution,” said Meagan-Hatcher Mays, director of Democracy Policy at Indivisible.

     She criticized the lack of recommendations. “The American people deserve better than this long-awaited yet deeply unhelpful pros and cons list.”

     Fix the Court, another group closely watching the commission, released its own blueprint, which lays out what it says are clear changes the public has said it wants.

     “The path to a more open, more responsive Supreme Court is clear as day,” FTC’s Gabe Roth said. “Term limits and accountability reforms are already extremely popular and have broad support among liberals and conservatives. We just need our leaders to lead in order to implement them.”

     As I wrote in my post of October 13 2020, One Elite To Rule Them All: On the Supreme Court;  We now are witnesses to a political sideshow which threatens to capture and derail the electoral process of America and has become the deciding issue which will determine whether or not democracy survives the criminal fascist regime of Trump; the confirmation hearings of a lunatic cult member whose mission is to invalidate the election if Trump should lose and to deliver to patriarchal state control the bodily autonomy of women.

    Amy Barrett is a vile piece of work shaped by her grooming as a Handmaiden of the Children of God cult, a title filled with all the existential sexual terror and warning for our future of Margaret Atwood’s visionary and classic novel, and densely programmed with the apologetics of state force and control as a protégé of the sinister theorist of absolutism Justice Scalia. She is the Fourth Reich’s chosen instrument of subversion of democracy and the negation of the equality of all human beings, and we must place her power in check; but we must also resist the misdirection of her confirmation hearings from the true source and precondition of the threat to our liberty which she represents, the power of the Supreme Court as the ultimate rulers of our nation.

     An antidemocratic and elitist institution which has evolved from its beginning with the growth of plutocratic and corporate power and the tyranny of the carceral state, we now live in a nation in which we are no longer co-owners of our government, but subjects of a few elders who like Plato’s philosopher-kings are the arbiters of all our decisions.

     We must restore the balance of power to our system of government; first by recognizing the inherently political nature of the Supreme Court and the judicial system as historically constructed, second by abolishing its power of judicial review and possibly the Supreme Court itself, or if permitted to continue to exist by changing its nature as a political asset of the President through changing the method of selection of its members from appointment to one of open election by a simple majority of the people or by rotation by lottery or seniority, and by limiting the terms of service to four or six years.

     In many ways our thinking about the justice system as a whole has been informed and motivated by the career of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, possibly the greatest judge in human history and an intellectual force equal to that of Francis Bacon, and as a lawyer the equal of Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. But her work to forge a free society of equals remains for us and for future generations to carry forward. Perhaps the best place to begin as a tribute to her legacy is the transformation of the role she played in our society as an iconic figure, democratizing and equalizing the power asymmetries of the Justices of the Supreme Court.

     This thing has fangs, and the time has come to pull them.

     As I wrote in my post of May 14 2020, Trump Orders Supreme Court to Grant Him Autocratic Powers; Traitor Trump’s subversion of democracy has now become a direct challenge to the rule of law, as he has de facto ordered the Supreme Court to grant him autocratic powers.

     If allowed to go unchallenged, his actions in this regard will allow him to suspend the Constitution and rule by decree, effectively ending two hundred and more years of democracy in our nation and our best hope for the survival of liberty in the future.

    Truth, Justice, and the American Way; should these principles become hollowed out and empty of meaning and force of law, should America fall to foreign manipulation, plutocratic corruption and greed, and the forces of atavistic barbarism in the twin forms of patriarchal Gideonite theocratic fundamentalism and fascist white supremacist terror, we shall have lost all that raises us above the level of beasts.

     We must not allow civilization to fall once again, for should it do so under these circumstances, a tyranny of force and darkness where state terror and control is absolute, it may never arise again.

     On the previous occasion of such a fall, when the log of a sentry of the Roman Empire recorded, “Today the mail did not arrive,” and thereafter a scouting party discovered they had been overrun by barbarian hordes and were alone, lost in a vast wilderness with civilization fallen, it took a thousand years for us to rediscover ideas of liberty and equality, that human relations can be something other than that of master and slave, and hundreds of years of wars and revolutions after that to reforge a free society of equals as founded in the Forum of Athens at the dawn of our history.

    Let us refuse to cast away all that we have won at great peril and cost in blood and treasure; let us hold to who we are as human beings and to the best of our values and traditions, to freedom, equality, truth, and justice, to our universal human rights, and to our co ownership of our government as citizens.    

     Let us not abandon our faith in one another nor our hope for the future, and forever remain Unconquered.

                        References

AOC launches effort to impeach Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito

Impeachment articles filed against Supreme Court justices

AOC understands the stakes: The “high crimes” of Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito must be prosecuted/ Salon

How the US supreme court shredded the Constitution and what can be done to repair it, Laurence H Tribe

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/08/us-supreme-court-presidential-immunity

The Guardian view on Trump and presidential immunity: the return of the king

Editorial

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/03/the-guardian-view-on-trump-and-presidential-immunity-the-return-of-the-king

The supreme court’s presidential immunity ruling mocks the rule of law

Corey Brettschneider

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/03/supreme-court-trump-immunity-authoritarian

https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-supreme-court-commission-releases-final-report-2021-12

https://www.washingtonpost.com//world/2020/09/28/trumps-supreme-court-move-deepens-fears-an-authoritarian-power-play/?utm_campaign=wp_todays_worldview&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_todayworld&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F2bcd0fc%2F5f715d9b9d2fda0efb372825%2F5a60d667ae7e8a0f035f4c5a%2F13%2F79%2F97e24584556eb58692899fdf928e2a67

https://jacobinmag.com/2018/10/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-partisan-jurisprudence

      On the battle cry of the Spanish Civil War and AOC’s counterpart La Pasionaria

La Pasionaria, Heroine of the Spanish Civil War

https://jacobin.com/2020/12/la-pasionaria-heroine-maternal-symbol-spanish-civil-war?sfnsn=mo

The Passions and the Interests: An effective left politics can’t just speak to workers’ material interests. It also has to construct myths that speak to people’s sense of dignity and humanity.

            On the Supreme Court; a retrospective of my essays

March 4 2024 Supreme Court Puts Trump, An Insurrectionist Who Conspired In the Murders of Police Officers and Attempted Hanging and Guillotining of Members of Congress, On Our Election Ballots

May 6 2022 There Is No Freedom Without That of Bodily Autonomy: On the Patriarchal Enslavement and Dehumanization of Women in the State Capture of Liberty and Equality in the Supreme Court’s Revocation of the Right to Abortion

February 13 2020 Trump Subverts and Weaponizes the Justice Department

October 13 2020 One Elite To Rule Them All: On the Supreme Court

July 19 2024 Victory Britain: In the Electoral Triumph of Labour Over the Tories, Of Love Over Hate and of Hope Over Fear, Britain Reclaims Her Heart

     Inconvenient truths are easier to interrogate in fiction than in history, if only because framing realities in symbolic terms lets them fly free of censorship and the authorized identities dangled before us by those who would enslave us. But this also lets our stories become larger than we are, universalizes new truths, and grants them power to overwrite ourselves with stories we have chosen as our own.

     As I have often written, this is the first revolution we all of us must fight, the struggle for ownership of ourselves; and it also grants us seizures of power as liminal agents of change, for self ownership, autonomy, and self creation make each of us gods of our own human being, meaning, and value.

     So it is nothing unusual that I imagine Britain in terms of its fictional history in George R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones, as did its former Queen and as do many of its citizens now.

     Are we not the stories we tell about ourselves, to ourselves and to others?

      As such I share the joy of the British peoples in their electoral victory of Labour over the Tories, of love over hate and of hope over fear, as Britain reclaims her heart.

     As written by Zadie Smith in The Guardian, in an article entitled ‘Here comes the sun’: Zadie Smith on hope, trepidation and rebirth after 14 years of the Tories; “Twenty-four years ago, when I was 24, I did my first reading in an American bookshop. At the end, in the question-and-answer bit, a middle-aged lady with a disgruntled look on her face put her hand up: “Yeah, I don’t get it.”

     I asked her what she didn’t get.

     “It just doesn’t add up. I mean, if you didn’t have any money – then how’d you go to that fancy university?”

     Now it was my turn to be confused: “Um … well, it was free.”

      “Whaddya mean? Like a scholarship?”

     “No. It was just free for everybody. Our taxes pay for it.”

     I will never forget the gasp that went around that Barnes & Noble. So I kept going: “And I didn’t pay for accommodation, either – we couldn’t afford it, so Brent council gave me a full grant. Oh, and then my little brother got run over by a truck during my first year and the NHS rebuilt his entire right hand – for free!” More gasping. I genuinely thought some of the older members of the crowd were about to have a heart attack, which would of course have been a pretty expensive affair – for them.

     Oh, I used to have a lot of fun with my American audiences back in the day. Telling my quirky tales of functional healthcare and education systems free at the point of use … But then came the moment when those stories came to feel not just outdated, but like ancient history. Or, more specifically, like a fairytale about a lost world, the postwar world, in which even a Tory like Churchill saw the need for a government that supports its citizens “from the cradle to the grave”. A world that – though very far from ever being perfected – remains the closest my country has ever come to anything resembling social equity.

     As the years passed, I began to feel that the whole matter of the past was becoming unmentionable, particularly in front of the young. It sounded like the kind of generational taunting I remember despising when I had to take it from the 60s crowd: hitchhiking in the Himalayas on a £20 budget, practising “free love” minus the shadow of Aids, etc.

     Who wants to hear this stuff? Who wants to hear about decent social housing, free education and world-class medical care when you can’t pay the rent, the neighbourhood school is failing and you haven’t seen a dentist for four years? I kept my fond memories of a functioning country to myself.

     We must remind ourselves that a more just society is possible

     But these days I think that historical nostalgia should not be the sole preserve of the right. The left can also make use of it. We can remind ourselves that a more just society is possible, if only because a few of the necessary conditions have at various moments actually existed upon this Earth, and in the not-so-distant past. With this in mind, I have begun thinking of the circumstances of my youth not as a fairytale or as an impossible fantasy, but as a real-life thing that did happen and might happen again, under the direction of a Labour party committed to the radical principles upon which it was founded.

     You should think of yourself (I said to myself) as something like the Ancient Mariner, just repeating over and over your tale of woe, in the hope that the next time the big bright bird of potential equity flies past the ship of state, we might remember what it looks like, and what it can do, and not let any Tories or neoliberals rush up on to the deck to shoot it down.

     This Ancient Mariner metaphor stood me in pretty good stead until I settled in the US, around 2010, returning 10 years later to a Britain I barely recognised. At this point, I became Rip Van Winkle. The list of things that have boggled my mind in the past four years is too long to recount here, but the final straw came just a few weeks ago, while I was washing up. The radio was on. A government spokesperson was extolling the virtues of conscription. Where else (asked the spokesperson) can people of different classes and races and genders meet each other on a more or less equal footing and pursue a common goal? Where else in modern-day Britain can community be fostered and encouraged, and people allowed a space in which their human capacities, whatever they may be, can flourish? Where else, I ask you, where else?

     I couldn’t work out if this spokesperson was so dense that he truly couldn’t think of an alternative answer to his own query, or if this was one of those very unfunny comedy skits you sometimes find yourself listening to when your hands are otherwise occupied with soap suds. But no: he was 100% serious. The thought that a well-funded state school would provide all of the above had truly never occurred to him. And then I realised: oh Jesus, if things carry on as they are, one day he’ll be right.

     Given what his party has been doing to the schools, the hospitals, the public services, the libraries and public housing, one day the army will be the only place where Britons of different classes will ever experience each other and the possibility of human flourishing. This guy wasn’t describing a policy he wanted enacted, not really. No, he was describing a dystopian reality that may yet come to pass.

     Going about the place giving readings, I meet a lot of young people and a lot of old people. A lot of black people and a lot of white people and a lot of brown people. A lot of straight people and a lot of queer people. Just a lot of everybody, in fact. It makes me happy that my books attract such a cross-section of people, and I love talking to them. Of course, conversation is by its nature anecdotal – and a novelist is not a pollster – but it is my very strong sense that, nationally speaking, the end of a tether has been collectively and definitively reached. And at the end of that frayed tether, I don’t hear culture war debates or fears that billionaires are going to leave the country if business taxes go up.

     These people are sheer ruination. They have bankrupted whole cities

Housing. Education. Healthcare. That’s what people talk about. Young people who have to pack up all their stuff every few months to move from one overpriced fleapit to another. Desperate, frazzled, working-class parents stunned to realise their rich counterparts now think it reasonable to “game the state system for a year or two” so it looks better on their kids’ university applications. People who know people who have died waiting for ambulances. People whose relatives died of Covid while Boris Johnson was partying. People queueing for my own local food bank, whom I recognise, whom I went to school with. Adults moving back into their childhood bedrooms, or out of town, or on to the streets.

     As far as I can tell, the people I meet when I’m out and about span the political spectrum from radical leftists to small-C conservatives. But whether they want to burn it all down or try to preserve and improve Britain’s rich cultural and institutional history, not one of them cares to live another month being “governed” (in this context, scare quotes are essential) by this particular group of high-rolling chancers, who do not seem to have a thought in their heads besides their own and their donors’ enrichment.

     Everybody is so, so tired. They’ve seen Conservative parties come and go, but these Conservatives are something else, as the centrist Tory Rory Stewart discovered when he tried to bring his conserving ideals to a party that barely understands the meaning of the word. These are not your 18th-century Tories. They’re not even your 20th-century Tories. These people are sheer ruination. They have bankrupted whole cities with their austerity measures, most notoriously Birmingham, slashing its budget by hundreds of millions since 2010. Low wages have plunged 900,000 British children into poverty.

     This is the party that first plotted the piecemeal privatisation and hollowing out of the NHS and this is also the party that has accelerated its dismantling to such a frightening degree that it appears to have spooked itself. After all, people dying on waiting lists is very bad optics indeed and, pragmatically speaking, will probably lead to a trouncing at the general election. And just when they were so close to the finish line! When the long-awaited, unimaginably lucrative windfall of a privatised service was about to fall into the laps of all their good friends in the private healthcare companies, turning millionaires into billionaires!

     Making Millionaires Billionaires. That’s really the slogan these guys should be running on. In a very real sense, it’s their only legacy. First, they succeeded in normalising the idea of a multimillionaire prime minister. Then they tried to make the argument that calling any attention to those multimillions amounted only to “the politics of envy”. Though perhaps they’re right. Certainly, anyone who has to deal with exploding energy bills, crumbling schools, food insecurity, poisoned water, hospital waiting lists and rapacious landlords is pretty envious at this point of the class of people for whom these problems will always remain mere newspaper headlines: a permanent oligarchical class, presently represented at the highest level of government, who live in an entirely different world.

     During my tenure in this self-appointed role of Ancient Mariner, sometimes I’d ask myself if I was irrationally attached to a nostalgic politics more suited to the past than the present. It’s true enough that I believe there are many things in Sidney Webb’s Labour party that are worth revisiting and reviving, but I feel I am, in my nostalgia, at least relatively clear-eyed about what it is I miss.

     Over the past 14 years, by contrast, we have been afflicted with a Tory party that claims to be nostalgic about the Thatcherite 80s, but in reality seems to want to return us all to a medieval feudal state. And the problem with a radically unequal country is not that it sparks a politics of envy, but that it doesn’t even work on its own terms. Inequality on this scale is not especially good for business – or rather it is good for so few businesses that its effects are practically invisible to 99% of the population.

     Inequality has also proved ruinous for culture, universities, the cities, the country, farmers, teachers, doctors, the police, the working classes, the lower middle classes and, at this point, even a fair whack of the rich middle class, who find themselves obsessing over their video doorbells, imploring their neighbours to chip in for private security on nextdoor.com and sounding deranged as they complain about being potentially priced out of a private school system that more than 90% of people will never attend.

     That’s the dark secret about this version of Conservatism: it doesn’t even work. That’s the joke of it all. What we have at this point is an unstable and dangerous mix of Thatcherite ideologues – determined to finish the job of dismantling a postwar social compact they despised from its inception – and shysters whose short-term thinking is so profound that they haven’t even the political will or energy to turn Britain into that fabled, deregulated paradise-for-some: “Singapore-on-Thames”. No, they’re too busy having lockdown parties or making secret millions off PPE contracts or betting on the date of the general election. They’re a whole new breed – and the good thing about that is their old defence tactics no longer work.

     I’m afraid the papers aren’t going to swing it for you this time, guys. People have eyes. People have children. People pay rent. People go to the shops. People get sick. People go to work. The damage you have done is everywhere and in plain sight. All you have succeeded in achieving this time round is keeping the environment off the agenda entirely, a truly shameful elision in which both of the main parties have colluded.

     But look outside: here comes the sun. The very intense sun. And come October (after the fires but just before the floods), perhaps it will be time for the party of the people to revisit its £28bn green deal. “But who will fund it?” cry the papers. And for my next sentence I will now type the startling fact that an estimated £570bn is being held by British residents in overseas tax havens.

     Why am I writing all this? Even the dogs in the street know all this. I am writing it because in my imprecise novelist way I sense a strange, nervy mating ritual going on between the country and the Labour party, strongly reminiscent of the circle-jerk of contemporary dating, and in the spirit of radical openness I want to bring it out of the shadows and into the open air.

     We keep anxiously checking our phones. Is this Labour party playing it cool? Or are we coming on too strong? Will it perhaps express its true feelings later? When it says “business”, does it really mean “renationalise the trains”? Or does it truly believe we’ll only vote for it if it keeps whispering sweet nothings to us about national security? Doesn’t it get how openly desperate we are? Oh, you can drive yourself crazy trying to project yourself into the minds of Labour MPs. One actually said to me recently: “But Zadie, we don’t want to get people’s hopes up …” Sorry, mate: my hopes are up. Because, unlike the many millions of despairing young people who have lived their whole adult lives in this state of ruination, I am the Ancient Mariner, and I know this is not the way things have to be or have always been.

     Of course, like everyone, I am trepidatious. Maybe the Labour party threw that flirty word “change” into its manifesto in a casual, teasing way, like when someone texts: “U up?” Well, Labour party, I’m not even playing it cool. My answer is: “YEP V MUCH AWAKE LET’S DO THIS.” (If I’d had a phone and been alive in 1945, this is what I would have texted Clement Attlee.)

     ‘Nothing will change after 5 July!’ You hear that a lot but I can’t agree

Now, some on the right will tell you that the big differences between 2024 and 1945 are thorny matters like “the economic realities of a globalised world” or “mass migration” or the 2008 financial crash or even (when they’re feeling honest) the own-goal of Brexit. Meanwhile, some on the left will sigh and explain that what happened post-1945 represents the kind of radical change that is only really possible after a ruinous world war. Well, 14 years of this government have created a situation impressively close to the aftermath of war: the immiseration of millions. Of course, nobody has all the answers to our thorny problems, but before we can deal properly with any of them, we will first need a government that at least identifies the purpose of government as being in the service of the people.

     “But nothing will change after 5 July!” You hear that one a lot. I can’t agree. The crucial difference will be the presence, however faint, of something that has been largely absent these past 14 years: governance itself. Because that really is the weirdest tale of them all: the one about the little sea-faring country that found itself being run by a bizarre subset of people who do not actually believe that government should serve the people – yet still insisted on forming one. Who felt virtually no responsibility towards the people they “governed”. Who treated their government posts as mere stepping stones to more remunerative work in the private sector.

    I know it all sounds like experimental fiction, but all of this actually happened! Here! They really did take over the ship of state, shoot down the albatross and then sail out upon wild and unregulated seas, during which harrowing journey we all got a horrifying glimpse of the prospect of “Singapore-on-Thames”. But nobody on this island wants to go any further in that direction. No sir. Not one of us. At least, nobody who doesn’t have a green card, many other passports and an offshore account. Roll on 4 July!”

    Here follow my previous essays on Britain; as Britain only has importance for me in terms of bringing down the monarchy and ending the Occupation of Northern Ireland, with some historical echoes and reflections in global anticolonial struggle in her former imperial subjects including America, these include two works on the monarchy, always public enemy number one, and two on the vile partners of the loathsome Traitor Trump in the sabotage of democracy known as Brexit.

     A Britain which is not a member of the EU has no further meaning for human history or global importance now, something I hope its new government can change. If you wish to be great again, O Britain, you must become part of something greater.

     As Lawrence of Arabia says to Faisal in the magnificent film; ”Time to be great again.”

     As I wrote in my post of May 6 2023, Britain’s Rituals of Subjugation to King Charles Visited By the Grim Reaper, Foretelling Doom to the Monarchy At the Heart of a Diseased and Leprous Empire; Like the Masque of the Red Death, Britain’s rituals of subjugation to King Charles were visited today by the Grim Reaper, foretelling doom to the monarchy at the heart of a diseased and leprous empire.

     On the throne of blood and gold the hollow shell of a zombie-fied and hideous desiccated corpse of imperial grandeur and symbolic hegemony and dominion of humankind, robbed of its meaning yet still bearing centuries of exploitation and oppression with its crown of stolen treasures and attended by sycophants of the elite who with this carnivalesque mummery enforce their own authority and power, swollen like ticks with the blood and wealth of the peoples and nations they have conquered and enslaved, this thing of terror and pathetic vacuous ravening illusions of superiority to all others claims us all as its dogs and vassals to the litanies of adulation and masochistic servile abasement of the mob, this Charles the Disloyal who betrayed the saintly Diana to her abandonment and death, this figure of the despicable British Empire.

    Of this grotesque event which confirms Britain’s subjugation to a monarchy and to imperial dominion, a performance of national identity intended to reinforce elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, my first response, upon realizing this means that those who hold power wish to portray and shape the whole of the British nation as a people united in the ecstasy of submission who wish to grovel before the feet of Queen Camilla as well as King Charles, was to mock; Britain’s Eva Braun becomes Queen. No, wait, actually Eva Braun wasn’t a homewrecker. Wonder how it feels to submit to the king’s whore?  No wait, that makes it sound fun.

     And at that moment I also realized that this adulation of inherent inequality and caste as monarchy by those gladly embracing their status as not fully human as well as social inferiors is a form of sadomasochistic submission to authority as well as a cult and a form of imperial power and identitarian politics. No wonder monarchy is persistent far beyond its purpose as intermediary for the Infinite for whom the king speaks his laws and commands their enforcement by armies and police who keep the slaves at their labor which crates the wealth and power for their betters; it is a Gordian Knot of recursive systems and forces of control which addict the slaves to their status and obedience to the Big Boss, and offers loaned power to its enforcers, apologists, and factotums. In pre-democratic and traditional authoritarian societies, there is an apex predator who serves as a top, and a vast population of bottoms who police each other in his name.

      Britain’s coronation of King Charles, named for a man so vile the people of England beheaded him in 1649 and among the last figures of a horror from the dark ages called the divine right of kings, is a kind of black mass of systemic unequal power and its consequences as falsification, commodification, and dehumanization, a curtain of illusions behind which corrupt and rapacious forces work with secrecy and impunity to enslave us and steal our souls.

     Always look behind the curtain. As Dorothy says to the Wizard; “You’re just an old humbug.”

      Who do we want to be, we human beings; masters and slaves, or a free society of equals?

       Herein let us look for guidance and models of seizure of power in revolutionary struggle to history; what happened the one and only time England was free, during the English Revolution and Cromwell’s Protectorate?

      Give me a Republic born of the guillotine, and not a kingdom born of the lash.  

     As I wrote in my post of September 8 2022, Apex Predator of the British Empire Dies; Where are the Celebrations, the Fireworks, the Dancing in the Streets?; A hideous ancient villainess and criminal perpetrator of systemic inequalities as an embodiment of historical imperialism, colonialism, and slavery which created the British Empire as an elite hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege, one to this day in existence in Occupied Northern Ireland, has died, yet the monarchy has not yet died with her.

    Where are the celebrations, the fireworks, the dancing in the streets? 

    There are events which remind me that England is an utterly alien nation, whose motives are mysterious and inexplicable as those of her citizens, one which my own nation of America was founded in anticolonial revolutionary struggle against. The British Empire is a dominion of imperial conquest and aristocratic elite wealth, power, and privilege, unchanged to this day from our glorious victory of Independence declared in 1776; the American Revolution was founded in democracy as an embodiment of the ideals of the Enlightenment, but also in social equality and the idea that no one is better than any other by reason or condition of birth inclusive of race and gender.

     The apex predator of the British Empire can bare her fangs no more, being the last of her kind who can say to her subjects “I am better than you” with an army to back it up, yet the citizens of the Empire hold no mass celebrations, nor purge their predators from among them.

    Centuries of abjection and learned helplessness may have stolen the souls of the peoples who claim membership and citizenship in the British Empire; yet I cannot believe this dehumanization is absolute. Among the vast precariat and invisible castes of the Empire are those who hunger to be free.

    Anyone with an inherited title or one he didn’t earn like Doctor or Captain is not only an enemy who does not recognize you as a fellow human being, but one whose existence is a crime against humanity regardless of his personal qualities, and who merits nothing but a Reckoning and war to the knife.

     As the line in the Gettysburg goes; “I damn all lords!”

    Now is the time, my friends, to seize your power and declare, no one is better than any other by reason of blood.

     As I wrote in my post of December 13 2019, Brexit is happening: Boris Johnson wins rulership of Britain in a massive electoral avalanche and conservative victory; The heartland of British liberalism and the Labour Party was snatched away by the lure of British independence from Europe in a massive avalanche of conservative votes, and has handed Boris Johnson a victory which recalls the tidal wave of Democrats abandoning their own candidate to vote for Donald Trump in 2016. Comparisons between them are inevitable; so with misguided efforts to frame them as parallel events.

     Two important differences disambiguate the Brexit 2019 and Trump 2016 elections; the first of these being that the Stolen Election of 2016 in America was a direct result of election rigging by Russia in conspiracy with Traitor Trump and the Party of Treason, whereas yesterday’s vote in Britain was a fair election which reveals pervasive and endemic flaws in the topology of British social and economic conditions; fears of threats to identity, which are always powerfully compelling, and the real hardships of a failing capitalist economy, which were also motives for those voting for Trump.

     A second difference speaks to the motives of voters; the British election hinged on a key issue which like a maelstrom has captured everything else in its tidal pull, whereas the American election focused on and was driven by cults of personality and their divisive effects, and was decided by the degree to which the candidates were able to win or alienate the constituencies of their own parties.

     I suspect our next election will be decided by this same second factor; will the Republicans disavow Trump’s monstrous and criminal regime? Will the Democrats run a candidate who is more liked than reviled by their own electorate? In this game the policies and issues matter little, and the glamour and stardom of candidates as celebrities matter greatly.

    We Americans concern ourselves generally with surfaces, images, outward forms; this is why we are so easy to bamboozle and deceive. The British and Europeans are generally our reverse in this; they vote for the issue which best reflects their own personal needs, regardless of the figurehead who touts it.

     Image isn’t everything with us, but its hugely impactful and the crucial factor in our decisions. If Hillary Clinton had worn a Doris Day wig during the campaign, she’d be our President now. Though my partner, a Hillary partisan of pugilistic inclination where ideology is concerned, was aghast and infuriated when I suggested it in 2016, Hillary needed to soften her image; Margaret Thatcher was a master of this and kept her own archconservative patriarchs in line by treating them as a governess would  naughty schoolboys, which they adored.

      Regarding political science as a discipline of aesthetics, as Spock says in the Star Trek episode Is There in Truth No Beauty?, describing “our last prejudice” as the “outmoded notion promulgated by your ancient Greeks that what is good must also be beautiful.” For further study I suggest the magnificent and insightful works of Umberto Eco, The History of Beauty and On Ugliness.

      Between the bounded realms of a thing and its image lies an interface with vast possibilities for authenticity, idealization, or misrepresentation and disconnectedness, misdirection, falsification, propaganda, strategies of influence and seizures of power. This is the master science which gives some of us power over others; the Art of Dominion. It is also a game each of us play continually in the performance of our identity.

     As I wrote in my post of June 3 2019, Glorifying Fascism: Trump Visits Britain; Britain glorifies the fascism they once defied heroically as the figurehead of the global Fourth Reich conspiracy against freedom and equality deigns to parade about a nation he so obviously despises, hoping to influence the campaign of his proxies Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage to seize power over the fragile democracy of these islands. Sadly, Britain seems to have lost the will to fight them on the beaches.

     The capture of Britain by a tyranny would tip the balance of history toward a total collapse of western civilization; in the meanwhile Trump can gain temporary leverage by insulting its leaders and institutions, damaging its prestige, monkeywrenching the traditional Anglo-American Alliance, cheerleading racism and misogyny, and otherwise furthering the goal of crippling Europe economically and politically through factionalization and de-unification.

     In the words of the courageous standard bearer of Liberty and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan in the Observer: “Praising the “very fine people on both sides” when torch-wielding white supremacists and antisemites marched through the streets clashing with anti-racist campaigners. Threatening to veto a ban on the use of rape as a weapon of war. Setting an immigration policy that forcefully separates young children from their parents at the border. The deliberate use of xenophobia, racism and “otherness” as an electoral tactic. Introducing a travel ban to a number of predominately Muslim countries. Lying deliberately and repeatedly to the public.

     No, these are not the actions of European dictators of the 1930s and 40s. Nor the military juntas of the 1970s and 80s. I’m not talking about Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong-un. These are the actions of the leader of our closest ally, the president of the United States of America. This is a man who tried to exploit Londoners’ fears following a horrific terrorist attack on our city, amplified the tweets of a British far-right racist group, denounced as fake news robust scientific evidence warning of the dangers of climate change, and is now trying to interfere shamelessly in the Conservative party leadership race by backing Boris Johnson because he believes it would enable him to gain an ally in Number 10 for his divisive agenda.

     Donald Trump is just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat. The far right is on the rise around the world, threatening our hard-won rights and freedoms and the values that have defined our liberal, democratic societies for more than seventy years. Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Matteo Salvini in Italy, Marine Le Pen in France and Nigel Farage here in the UK are using the same divisive tropes of the fascists of the 20th century to garner support, but are using new sinister methods to deliver their message. And they are gaining ground and winning power and influence in places that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.”

The Enchanted Glass: Britain and its Monarchy, Tom Nairn

‘Here comes the sun’: Zadie Smith on hope, trepidation and rebirth after 14 years of the Tories

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/03/zadie-smith-on-hope-trepidation-and-rebirth-after-14-years-of-the-tories?CMP

Prepare for the toppling of private school politics – and a cultural change within Westminster | John Harris

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/30/private-school-politics-tories-labour?CMP=share_btn_url

This election has upended British politics. A strange new landscape is revealed | Rafael Behr

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/05/election-results-labour-conservatives-upended-british-politics?CMP=share_btn_url

A History of the British Empire In Fiction: Game of Thrones

Season One Recap

Official Season 2 Recap Trailer (HBO)

Official Season 3 Recap Trailer (HBO)

Official Season 4 Recap Trailer (HBO)

Official Season 5 Recap Trailer (HBO)

Official Season 6 Recap Trailer (HBO)

Season 7: Official Trailer (HBO)

Season 8 | Official Trailer (HBO)

A Song of Ice and Fire #1-5, George R.R. Martin

The World of Ice & Fire: The Untold History of Westeros and the Game of Thrones, George R.R. Martin, Elio M. García Jr., Linda Antonsson

Winter Is Coming: The Medieval World of Game of Thrones, Carolyne Larrington

Race for the Iron Throne: Political and Historical Analysis of “A Game of Thrones”, Steven Attewell

Fire Cannot Kill a Dragon: Game of Thrones and the Official Untold Story of the Epic Series, James Hibberd

    What Happened the one and only time England was free; a reading list on the English Revolution and Cromwell’s Protectorate

 Revolution: The Great Crisis of the British Monarchy 1685 – 1720, Tim Harris                   

Providence Lost: The Rise and Fall of Cromwell’s Protectorate, Paul Lay

Commonwealth Principles: Republican Writing of the English Revolution,

Jonathan Scott

Milton and the English Revolution, Christopher Hill

Ehud’s Dagger: Class Struggle in the English Revolution, James Holstun

Liberty Against the Law: Some Seventeenth-Century Controversies,

Christopher Hill

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/189335.Liberty_Against_the_Law

Oliver Cromwell: Politics and Religion in the English Revolution 1640 – 1658,

David L. Smith

The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution,

Christopher Hill

A History of Political Thought in the English Revolution, Perez Zagorin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5299306-a-history-of-political-thought-in-the-english-revolution

The English Revolution and the Wars in the Three Kingdoms, 1638-1652,

Ian Gentles

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1593498.The_English_Revolution_and_the_Wars_in_the_Three_Kingdoms_1638_1652

Oliver Cromwell: God’s Warrior and the English Revolution, Ian Gentles

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12030821-oliver-cromwell

The White King: Charles I, Traitor, Murderer, Martyr, Leanda de Lisle

Thomas Cromwell Series, Hilary Mantelhttps://www.goodreads.com/series/75450-thomas-cromwell

July 18 2024 A Crusade Begins: On the Reimagination of the Failed Assassination as Divine Intervention and the Anointing of a King, and Theocracy As the Idolatry of Trump Cast In the Role of Cyrus the Great In A New Myth of Exile

     During the coronation ceremonies at today’s Party of Treason festivities, we are confronted by a cultlike homage to the Fuhrer of rows upon rows of fake ear bandages, signs of submission and of the reimagination of the failed assassination of Our Clown of Terror as divine intervention and the anointing of a king, and of Gideonite Theocracy as the idolatry of Traitor Trump cast in the role of Cyrus the Great in a new myth of exile.

     QAnon has been instrumental in laying the groundwork for the Age of Tyrants to come, as has the network of Pentecostal, charismatic, and other fundamentalist churches which operate as a Christian Identity-Fourth Reich propaganda insurgency. The story of the subversion of our secular democracy as a theocratic tyranny in America begins in 1980 with the capture of the Republican Party by Christian Identity fundamentalists under Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority, which put Reagan in the White House, though it drew on pre existing Confederate and Nazi elements and ideologies.

     And all of this draws on far more ancient sources, from the Crusades and the Inquisition, and so we may interrogate with great precision what we are witnessing in this historical moment in the birth of a terrible new faith, and act to save each other from its consequences.

     What Trump and the Party of Treason are attempting to launch here is not limited to the goals of a re-election campaign; it is nothing less than a crusade.

     As written by Adam Gabbatt and Alice Herman in The Guardian, in an article entitled Christian right see God’s hand in Trump rally shooting: ‘The world saw a miracle’: Attempted assassination bolsters Trump’s support in a key part of the Republican base – conservative evangelicals; “Rocío Cleveland was at a wedding on Saturday when she heard the news that something had happened to Donald Trump. He had fallen, clutching his ear, while giving remarks at a rally and it wasn’t yet clear if he was injured or even dead.

     “It took a little bit for it to sink in,” said Cleveland, a conservative activist from Illinois who attended the Republican national convention this week. “I was speechless, I was crying, I was in tears.”

     Trump had been tackled to the ground by a Secret Service detail after a gunman, perched on a nearby roof, opened fire on the crowd at a Trump rally. When the former US president rose, shaking his fist, blood dripping down his face – apparently only grazed by the would-be assassin’s bullet – the moment, for Cleveland, was euphoric.

     “I think this tragic event that happened to President Trump, I think it will restore the faith in our country, as horrible as it may sound,” Cleveland said. “The world saw a miracle before their eyes.”

     Cleveland’s perspective – that Trump’s survival was more than just luck – is shared widely by Christian believers in the Maga (Make America great again) movement who have seen the hand of God in Trump’s recent escape from serious harm at the hands of a gun-wielding 20-year-old shooter with no easily discernible motive.

     It also bolsters Trump’s support in a key part of the Republican base – conservative evangelicals – that he and his team have been seeking to woo be deploying Christian imagery throughout his 2024 campaign.

     The religious feeling, that Trump was saved in an act of divine intervention, quickly took hold in the Republican party after the shooting, with grassroots activists, internet personalities and powerful Republican lawmakers offering religious explanations for the near-miss.

     “I have no doubt that God lowered a shield of protection over Donald Trump,” Ben Carson, Trump’s former secretary of housing and urban development, told the crowd on Tuesday night.

     Carson said he had “watched with horror” as Trump was shot.

     “And my thoughts immediately turned to the book of Isiah,” Carson said. “That says no weapon formed against you shall prosper.”

     Others have also suggested divine intervention. One viral image that circulated on X in the days after the shooting showed how close the bullet came to striking Trump in the brain, rather than grazing his ear.

     “God intervened,” a caption on the photo read. The image has been viewed almost 800,000 times.

     Trump has not always been a favourite of the Christian right. A thrice-married man who has referred to the Eucharist as a “little cracker”, who was reportedly unable to name a single Bible verse and says he has never asked God for forgiveness, seemed an unlikely hero when he first ran for president.

     But Trump’s selection of the pious Mike Pence as his running mate allayed concerns in 2016, and his nomination of conservative justices to the supreme court paved the way for the overturning of Roe v Wade – a huge victory for conservative Christians and one that appears to have sealed the bond between them and Trump.

     While religious Trump supporters at the grassroots level seized on to a biblical interpretation of the shooting, influential figures in the Christian right have amplified it.

     In a podcast episode titled Prophecy or Coincidence, Lance Wallnau, an influential pastor and self-described prophet, said that prayers for Trump had “worked” in saving the former president, and speculated that the shooter had been motivated by the left to commit an act of spiritual warfare.

     In the episode, Wallnau referred to an apparent authority on the subject: Trump, who in the wake of the shooting, claimed on Truth Social that it was “God alone who prevented the unthinkable from happening”

     “We will FEAR NOT, but instead remain resilient in our Faith and Defiant in the face of Wickedness,” Trump wrote.

     Again and again at the Republican national convention, prominent attendees and speakers echoed the sentiment.

     “Let me start by giving thanks to God almighty for protecting president Trump, and for turning his head on Saturday as the shot was fired,” Ted Cruz, the Texas senator, said in his speech.

     “Together we lift up in prayer all of our leaders for protection.”

     Mike Lindell, the pillow salesman turned election conspiracy theorist and Trump ally, said during a podcast interview staged outside the convention center on Monday that an image of Trump on the ground, alive after the shooting, inspired in him a sense of religious awe.

     “It’s like right there, you could feel the presence of God talking to us,” said Lindell, his voice wavering. “It’s gonna be OK. It’s gonna be OK.”

     Others invoked darker forces. In his speech Tim Scott, the senator from South Carolina, claimed “the devil came to Pennsylvania holding a rifle”, while Marjorie Taylor Greene, the divisive Florida congresswoman, said “evil came for the man we admire and love so much”.

     For Marlene Stuck, who traveled with congregants from her church in Stillwater, Oklahoma, to Milwaukee for the Republican national convention, the shooting was evidence of a fundamental spiritual truth.

     “The word of God works,” said Stuck. “It saved his life.”

     As written by Sidney Blumenthal in The Guardian, in an article entitled To his supporters, Trump is a martyred messiah, resurrected after crucifixion; “The attempted assassination of Donald Trump has transformed the theology of Trump. He has long portrayed himself as an innocent lamb falsely accused, the target of slings and arrows to bear the suffering of believers. Now the bullet and the blood of Butler, Pennsylvania, have sanctified him for the faithful and brought forth a new gospel.

     Earlier this month, the Republican National Committee endorsed the party platform, a document that contained a plank pledging to create a new federal agency to defend Christian nationalism: “To protect Religious Liberty, Republicans support a new Federal Task Force on Fighting Anti-Christian Bias that will investigate all forms of illegal discrimination, harassment, and persecution against Christians in America.” The document casts Christians as though they are a sect still persecuted by the Romans, about to be dragged into the Colosseum to face ferocious beasts.

     But after the shooting, there was no mention of a platform. There was no reference to the political party. Trump had not simply survived crucifixion. He was not only resurrected. He became his own second coming. He was washed in his own blood. Divine intervention proved he was destined to return. All that is required from followers are declarations of faith. The return is a restoration of the grand course of events that was unjustly detoured by a stolen election. Trump is now a martyr, resurrected and the second coming all at once. All power is invested in the messiah on day one.

     “The doctor at the hospital said he never saw anything like this, he called it a miracle,” Trump explained. “I’m not supposed to be here, I’m supposed to be dead. By luck or by God, many people are saying it’s by God I’m still here.” He was reborn.

     His sanctification has produced a new narrative by those who wish to be seen as his most fervent apostles. They compete to proclaim the new gospel. “GOD protected President Trump yesterday,” tweeted House speaker Mike Johnson. “God’s hand of protection” held Trump safe, the Rev Franklin Graham told Fox News. “The devil came to Pennsylvania holding a rifle,” said Senator Tim Scott, Republican of South Carolina. “Listen, if you didn’t believe in miracles before Saturday, you better be believing right now.” They are the chosen messengers of the chosen one. The fervor with which they tell the story reveals more than their faith, but also establishes their seat at the table of the apostles.

     The most important revelation was written within hours of the shooting by Senator JD Vance, now Trump’s running mate. His was not a gospel of peace, but of wrath. “Today is not just some isolated incident,” Vance wrote. “The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to President Trump’s attempted assassination.”

     Pointing his spear at the enemy, Vance settled the apostolic succession. He is a changeling, who once compared Trump to “heroin” and “Hitler”, but his conversion into Trump’s warrior has vaulted him to become the anointed disciple and chief of the praetorian guard of the living godhead.

     Before the assassination attempt, the Christian nationalists’ narrative awkwardly tried to fit the licentious, sinful and predatory Trump into a framework in which his apparent absence of virtue and religious faith served virtue and faith. They commonly referred to him as King Cyrus, after the Persian ruler, who did not “recognize” God but was described in Isaiah 45 as “anointed” by the Lord to free the exiled Jews in Babylon.

     Trump’s origin story as the son of the brutish real estate operator Fred Trump and the pupil of the nefarious fixer and Mafia lawyer Roy Cohn was always problematic. None of his followers ever acknowledge it, except perhaps for Cohn’s protege Roger Stone, who was handed Trump to run as a client when Cohn was dying of Aids. That true crime story remains dangerous to the Trump mythology.

     A movie about Trump’s relationship with Cohn, The Apprentice, which premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, has not yet found an American distributor. Media companies have been intimidated at the possibility of Trump’s vengeance. “If you do not immediately cease all publication and marketing of the movie, President Trump will pursue every appropriate legal means to hold you accountable for this gross violation of President Trump and the American people’s rights,” Trump’s lawyer wrote the producers of the film.

     So, as in Isaiah 45, the 45th president was the king whose “right hand” was invisibly guided from above. “He, like King Cyrus before him, fulfilled the biblical prophecy of the gods worshiped by Jews,” proclaimed Jeanine Pirro, a Fox News host. The Trump Prophecy, a film hailing his presidency as divinely ordained, produced with faculty and students from Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University, also cast him as King Cyrus. An evangelical preacher, Paula White, whom Trump invited to speak at his 2017 inauguration ceremony and welcomed to the White House to bless him for nominating Neil Gorsuch to the supreme court, declared: “Because God says that he raises up and places all people in places of authority, it is God who raises up a king.”

     After Trump’s multiple indictments and felony conviction, he intensified his image-making as a martyr, the victim of conspiratorial forces, of the “Deep State”, “radical left Democrats” and “globalist elites”. He presented himself as selflessly absorbing the blows that were really meant for his supporters, whom he was shielding from “poisoning of the blood” from immigrants. But he instantly translated his supposed self-sacrifice into cries of revenge.

     On 4 August 2023, the day after he was formally charged in the January 6 case, Trump posted on Truth Social: “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” By April of this year, Trump had made numerous threats against the judges, court staff and witnesses in all of his cases, who have received death threats and are under the protection of security details, including the US marshals. Trump’s courtroom outbursts forced judges to issue 14 gag orders. In the New York hush-money case, he violated 10 gag orders, which may be pertinent in his sentencing on 18 September. In that case, after Trump attacked Judge Juan Merchan’s daughter, Merchan said, in issuing one of the gag orders: “The threat is very real.”

     On 4 June, after his conviction on 34 felonies in the New York hush-money case, Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News: “Look, when this election is over, based on what they’ve done, I would have every right to go after them. And it’s easy because it’s Joe Biden and you see all the criminality.” Biden, of course, had nothing to do with the New York case.

     Two weeks earlier, Trump had appeared before the National Rifle Association convention to warn: “If the Biden regime gets four more years, they are coming for your guns, 100% certain.” He conflated gun control with his trials: “No, they want to take away your rights. Well, I know that better than anybody. They want to take away my rights better than anybody, worse than Alphonse Capone.” He returned to guns. “We have to have a gun,” he said. “If we don’t have a gun, we’re dead people.”

     On 6 January 2024, a week before the Republican Iowa caucuses, 17-year-old Dylan Butler entered his school in a small town in Perry, north of Des Moines, killed one student and wounded seven more people before he shot himself. He also had an explosive device. “Two friends and their mother who spoke with the AP said Butler was a quiet person who had been bullied relentlessly since elementary school,” the Associated Press reported. After 36 hours of silence, Trump called the incident “very terrible”, adding: “But we have to get over it, we have to move forward.”

      Back in 2015, after Trump announced his first candidacy, he gave an interview to a gun blog called Ammoland. He had previously supported the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, passed in 1994 under the Clinton administration, which a research team at New York University’s Langone Medical Center for the National Institute of Health calculated reduced mass shootings by 70%. That ban was allowed to lapse in 2004 under the George W Bush administration.

     Trump wanted to reassure the gun lobby that he was emphatically against gun control. “To the left, every gun is an assault weapon,” he said. “I certainly stand by my opposition to gun control when it comes to taking guns from law-abiding citizens. You mention that the media describes the AR-15 as an ‘assault rifle,’ which is one example of the many distortions they use to sell their agenda. However, the AR-15 does not fall under this category. Gun-banners are unfortunately preoccupied with the AR-15, magazine capacity, grips and other aesthetics, precisely because of its popularity.”

     On 9 August 2016, Trump delivered a stemwinding speech against gun control and threatened the assassination of Hillary Clinton, his Democratic opponent. He ridiculed the idea of “gun-free zones” and hypothesized being shot by a gunman from the side, saying: “Do you know what a gun-free zone is? That’s like – they study where the gun-free zones – if they would have known you had guns, if they would have known that they were going to be shot at from the other side, it would have been a whole different story. Maybe it wouldn’t have even happened in the first place.”

     Then, he incited the crowd against Hillary Clinton. “If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Trump said. “Although the second amendment, people – maybe there is, I don’t know.”

     Four years later, Hillary Clinton still appeared as a target for Donald Trump Jr, who posted a picture of himself on Instagram on 4 January 2020, holding an AR-15 etched with a Crusader’s Cross, a far-right symbol, and Hillary Clinton’s image behind bars on the magazine. “Nice day at the range. @rarebreedfirearms and @spikes_tactical adding a little extra awesome to my AR and that mag,” he wrote.

    On January 6, according to testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to the White House chief of staff, when Trump was informed that thousands in the crowd on the Ellipse whom he urged on to the Capitol refused to be screened for weapons at the magnetometers set by the Secret Service, he shouted: “I don’t fucking care that they have weapons! They’re not here to hurt me. They can march to the Capitol from here.”

     Among the banners carried by the mob assaulting the Capitol was a large Confederate flag adorned with an AR-15 and the inscription “Come and Take It”. Other flags depicted Trump carrying an assault rifle. One of the rightwing militias staging the attack, the Oath Keepers, stashed a small armory of AR-15s and other weapons at the ready in a suburban Virginia motel.

     On 13 July, earlier this month, Trump stepped onto the stage in Butler county, Pennsylvania, where he began by denouncing “the fake news” for not reporting the size of this “big, big, beautiful crowd”. He falsely claimed that Joe Biden had lied about his own crowd sizes, and said: “And we got to bring our country back to health, because our country is going to hell, if you haven’t noticed. Millions and millions of people are pouring in from prisons and from mental institutions.” Trump ripped into “Crooked Joe Biden and laughing Kamala Harris”. He said: “Our country’s been stolen from us … one of the greatest crimes is what they’ve done over four years and hiding what the obvious facts are … .”

     He was referring to the election of 2020: “I tell you what, we did fantastically in 2016. We did much better in 2020. You know we did much better, and it was rigged. It was a rigged deal.”

     He turned to talking about people crossing the southern border: “Criminals, we have criminals. We have drug dealers. We have people who should not be here.” On a large screen to the right of his stage, a chart showed how immigration had increased under Biden, though not its recently rapid decrease; he said: “The worst president in the history of our country took over, and look what happened to our country.” Trump turned his head slightly to look at the chart, and said: “And if you, uh, want to really see something that’s sad, take a look at what happened … .” Then the bullet clipped his ear. The shooter with a semi-automatic rifle killed a bystander and critically injured two others.

     The reborn Trump announced that he would rewrite his acceptance speech to the Republican convention. “It is a chance to bring the country together. I was given that chance,” he said. On the first day of the convention, a Trump-appointed judge, Aileen Cannon, issued a ruling in the national security documents and obstruction case stating that the special prosecutor was illegal, and dismissed the entire case against Trump – a ruling nearly all legal experts regarded as bizarre, partial and likely to be overturned.

     Trump’s continuing streak of remarkable luck inspired him to descend from his heavenly state into his usual pit of grievance. His idea of bringing the country together is a lengthy self-interested checklist of settling scores. Uneasy rests the crown of thorns. On 15 July, he posted:

     As we move forward in Uniting our Nation after the horrific events on Saturday, this dismissal of the Lawless Indictment in Florida should be just the first step, followed quickly by the dismissal of ALL the Witch Hunts – The January 6th Hoax in Washington, D.C., the Manhattan D.A.’s Zombie Case, the New York A.G. Scam, Fake Claims about a woman I never met (a decades old photo in a line with her then husband does not count), and the Georgia “Perfect” Phone Call charges. The Democrat Justice Department coordinated ALL of these Political Attacks, which are an Election Interference conspiracy against Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME. Let us come together to END all Weaponization of our Justice System, and Make America Great Again!

     The motive of the 20-year-old shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, remains obscure. From the accounts of those who knew him, he was a quiet boy, awarded a $500 high school prize for his talent at math, who spent two years at a local community college studying engineering, worked as a dietary aide at a nursing home and lived at home. He once gave $15 to a liberal organization, but was a registered Republican. Fellow students remember him as always being a conservative.

     “He definitely was conservative,” one former classmate told the Philadelphia Inquirer. “It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate.” In a school mock debate, the classmate said: “Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side. That’s still the picture I have of him. Just standing alone on one side while the rest of the class was on the other.”

     Another student recalled that others “tormented Crooks ‘almost every day’ and that he often wore ‘hunting’ outfits to class”. Crooks seems to have recently spent time down the rabbit hole of a pro-gun YouTube channel called Demolition Ranch; when he shot Trump, he was wearing one of its T-shirts, with the slogan “What The Hell”. He had parked his car nearby filled with explosives. Perhaps he intended to ram it into the crowd in a spectacular suicide.

     Crooks left no letter, no manifesto and no clues on social media. His premeditation did not involve making known his personal motive. He wrote no political statement. Trump’s appearance near his home suddenly gave him an opportunity to strike back. He was a bullied boy.”

     Dreadful, all of this, but there is nothing new in the weaponization of faith in service to power. We have seen it all before, in many forms throughout human history, and I can tell you one thing with absolute clarity and truth; no matter where you begin with divisions and hierarchies of belonging and exclusionary otherness, with fascisms of faith, race, and nation, you always end up at the gates of Auschwitz.

     As I wrote in my post of August 9 2023, Qanon Propaganda Film Sound of Freedom Designed to Rally Trump’s Faithful As Lawsuits and Indictments Begin to Hold Him Accountable For His Crimes; Qanon comes courting America dressed in all its finery and fascist splendor in the propaganda film Sound of Freedom, winning masses to its ideology of victimhood, the myth of a Shadow State, and the subversion of truth which is the true goal of any conspiracy theory.

      “When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross”, as the saying goes, which originates in a 1917 speech by Eugene V. Debs as published in The Muncie Sunday Star newspaper of Indiana. Here is the quote; “Every robber or oppressor in history has wrapped himself in a cloak of patriotism or religion, or both.” A year later he rephrased it in another speech as; “In every age it has been the tyrant, who has wrapped himself in the cloak of patriotism, or religion, or both.”

      With the unmasking of the Republican Party as an organization of fascist terror and the Stolen Election of 2016 in which a Russian agent and figurehead of the Fourth Reich captured the state, a new faith emerged to legitimize his regime and the infiltration and subversion of the ideals and institutions of democracy, Qanon. And this summer a film which advances its agenda is released, to enormous profits and success.

       Why now? Because it is timed to divert attention from the lawsuits and indictments which with glacial slowness begin to hold Trump accountable for his crimes, and to rally the faithful of America’s obscene and lurid new religion which is in the process of replacing the Pentecostal-fundamentalist network of churches which once catapulted the Fourth Reich into power with its capture of the Republican Party in 1980 and the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, and now serves his successor and Russian agent Traitor Trump.

      Yes, this QAnon propaganda film comes to theatres and homes direct from a child trafficking ring. Who funded it? Who distributes it? Who promotes it? I found an advertisement for this film in my FB feed the other day and removed it; does FB know what it sells, or is it all just money to them?

       Of course there are real human trafficking rings committing the most horrific of crimes against humanity everywhere, and there can be no more terrible fear than that of losing a child to such atrocities. I once estimated that a third of the world’s wealth is created by slave labor, and it may be nearer to two thirds, depending what you count as slavery. Child abduction represents a fraction of a percent of this, but its horror cannot be overstated. Such criminals define the limits of the human and must be purged from among us; but this kind of fear can be very useful to those who wish to shape our fear in service to their power.

     And this, friends, this weaponization of fear by authority, whether against others as external threats as in racist violence, vote suppression and theft of citizenship, the re-enslavement of Black people as prison labor, and genocidal policies of immigration, or the depravity of a mythic shadow state as an internal threat, must also be resisted equally to the threats authority claims to protect us from as it manufactures legitimacy and consent to be governed as the subjugation of its citizens.

     Effective propaganda is not merely a lie; it is a lie plus a truth, a truth which authorizes the lie at the same time as the lie changes the meaning of the truth in recursive process. The true danger of propaganda like Sound of Freedom is that as soon as you create the idea of a Shadow State and that everything you know is a lie, whether it is called the Deep State or the Jewish Conspiracy, you have created the preconditions of fascism and tyranny as the delegitimation and subversion of democracy.

      As written by Voltaire in his 1765 essay Questions sur les Miracles; “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

     As written by Shira Li Bartov in The Times of Israel, in an article entitled Surprise blockbuster ‘Sound of Freedom’ echoes antisemitic QAnon conspiracies: Thriller’s ideology draws on blood libel canard, expert says, and star Jim Caviezel has floated anti-Jewish conspiracy theories while promoting the film; “While “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer” have hogged the Hollywood headlines, a more unlikely blockbuster swept the box office this month: “Sound of Freedom,” a thriller lauded by QAnon conspiracy theorists and high-profile Republicans.

     It also draws from a conspiratorial well that includes a number of anti-Jewish canards, including the “blood libel” accusation, while its star, actor Jim Caviezel, has floated antisemitic theories in interviews promoting the film.

Despite the film’s low budget and independent distributor, “Sound of Freedom” has made over $100 million in its first few weeks, going toe-to-toe with “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” since it opened on July 4. The release date aligned with its patriotic Christian undertones, captured by the protagonist’s solemn line, “God’s children are not for sale.”

     Caviezel plays a federal agent rescuing children from sex traffickers, and in real life, has openly embraced QAnon. Caviezel’s character is based on Tim Ballard, who worked in the US Department of Homeland Security before founding the anti-trafficking group Operation Underground Railroad.

     Caviezel is best known for playing Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s “Passion of the Christ,” which stirred accusations of antisemitism when it was released in 2004 — a controversy compounded by Gibson’s antisemitic tirades following its release.

     The QAnon movement is largely based on a conspiracy theory that a cabal of progressive elites controls world events and runs a child trafficking ring, harvesting the hormone adrenochrome from children. According to QAnon lore, former US president Donald Trump sought to defeat this operation.

     “Sound of Freedom” was filmed in 2018, before QAnon gained widespread momentum, and the film never mentions the movement. The story’s traffickers are common criminals, seemingly not part of a shadowy global cabal. Nonetheless, the movie has been celebrated in QAnon message boards for awakening “normies” to the conspiracy.

     “The movie is for normies. Done in a way not to be revolting and push newbies away,” said one member of a message board called Great Awakening.

     Mike Rothschild, an expert who researches QAnon, said he was not surprised that the film took off with QAnon supporters, who see a global cabal of child snatchers as funded by Jewish money.

     “It plays on the same fears and conspiracy theories embraced by that community — that child trafficking is rampant and massively underreported, that the traffickers have connections to high-level people, and that only a few brave patriots are willing to stand up to it,” Rothschild, author of “The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything,” told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

     Caviezel attended a QAnon-affiliated conference in 2021. During the event, he said that Ballard could not join because he was “saving children as we speak, because they’re pulling kids out of the darkest recesses of hell right now, in dumps and all kinds of places. The adrenochrome-ing of children.”

     The adrenochrome theory has roots in a blood libel canard leveled at Jews since the Middle Ages, said Rothschild. The myth that Jews use the blood of Christian children in rituals was used to justify the torture, imprisonment and murder of Jews for centuries, even taking a role in Nazi propaganda, before it was adopted by QAnon.

     Caviezel has also appeared on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast several times, calling QAnon a “good thing” and indulging in antisemitic conspiracies while promoting the film.

     In one circuitous interview with Bannon, he said, “It’s like an octopus with arms, many many arms, but you got to go after the head of the octopus. Who is it? The central banks, the [International Monetary Fund], the [European Central Bank], the Rothschild banks? We have a Rothschild pope.”

     Rothschild, who is unrelated to the Jewish banking family, said these claims line up with QAnon conspiracies that posit that the Rothschild family owns all of the world’s central banks and controls the Vatican.

     “These are conspiracy theories based on centuries of myths and hoaxes about the Rothschilds, which have been shared by some of the most prominent thinkers in the right-wing conspiracy world,” he said.

     Ballard, who abruptly exited Operation Underground Railroad shortly after “Sound of Freedom” premiered, has also been scrutinized for his organization’s claims and practices. In 2020, a Vice News investigation found a gap between OUR’s operations and claimed successes, reporting “a pattern of image-burnishing and mythology-building, a series of exaggerations that are, in the aggregate, quite misleading.” According to a Foreign Policy report, after a 2014 OUR sting operation in the Dominican Republic, 26 rescued girls did not receive aftercare and were released in less than a week.

     In Utah, the organization was investigated by the Davis County Attorney’s Office for alleged communications fraud, witness tampering and retaliation against a witness, victim or informant, according to Deseret News. The two-year investigation was closed without charges in March.

     Ballard has also flirted with conspiracy theories, once entertaining the false viral notion that children were being trafficked through Wayfair, an online furniture retailer.

     “I want to tell you this: children are sold that way,” he said in a 2020 video.

     Regardless of these controversies, “Sound of Freedom” has found no shortage of high-profile promoters. Trump shared its trailer on his Truth Social platform and hosted a screening of the film on Wednesday. South Carolina Senator Tim Scott and Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has pushed QAnon rhetoric online, both praised the movie. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said on Twitter, “Wow. Wow. Wow. GO SEE #SoundOfFreedom.”

     Twitter owner Elon Musk encouraged the film’s free promotion on his website, tweeting at its distributor: “I recommend putting it on this platform for free for a brief period or just asking people to subscribe to support (we would not keep any funds).”

     What kind of people endorse and promote conspiracy theories which authorize genocide? People who want us to look the other direction, as the humbug wizard tells Dorothy; “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

      Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain.

     As written by Aleks Phillips in Newsweek, in an article entitled ‘Sound of Freedom’ Funder Fabian Marta Arrested For Child Kidnapping; “Fabian Marta, one of thousands of patrons of the crowdfunded anti-child trafficking film Sound of Freedom, was arrested and charged with accessory to child kidnapping, according to a Missouri court filing. The Class A felony carries a penalty of ten to thirty years in prison, or life imprisonment.

     Since-removed Facebook posts appear to show the same person revealing their pride in funding the film. Marta’s name appears in the movie’s credits among the “investors [who] helped bring Sound of Freedom to theaters.”

     Sound of Freedom dramatizes the story of anti-child sex-trafficking organization Operation Underground Railroad and its founder, Tim Ballard, who is played in the movie by Jim Caviezel.

    St. Louis Metropolitan Police confirmed to Newsweek that Marta, 51, from Chesterfield, Missouri, was charged on July 23 following an incident reported on July 21. Newsweek approached Marta via Facebook direct message for comment on Friday.

     Police also provided a booking photo of Marta, which appears to show the same person pictured on a Facebook account of the same name. Screenshots of since-removed posts from multiple online sources, seen by Newsweek but which could not be independently verified, show Marta speaking about his involvement with the film.

     “The Sound of Freedom movie tackles a very tough subject, and took extraordinary effort to bring it to movie theaters,” one of the screenshotted posts said. “I’m proud to have been a small part of it. If you see the movie look for ‘Fabian Marta and Family’ at the very end of the credits.”

     “Fabian Marta & Family” appears on a list of funding contributors in the film’s credits at around 129 minutes and 30 seconds into its run time.

     Marta’s next court date is listed in records as August 28. Court records do not yet list his legal counsel in the case.

     His bail was set at $15,000 but he was released on personal recognizance following an initial appearance on July 24. The nature of the incident the criminal case relates to is not clear.

     Newsweek approached both Steven Capizzi, the Missouri state attorney prosecuting the case, via email for comment on Friday.

     Sound of Freedom’s release was initially delayed after being “bounced around” by studios and the coronavirus pandemic leaving many productions shelved, makers Angel Studios said, before nearly $5 million was crowdfunded for its theatrical release.

     The production has since shocked industry insiders by competing with—and occasionally beating—the likes of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny and Mission: Impossible Dead Reckoning Part One at the domestic box office in July.

     The film has attracted the support of individuals from both sides of the political spectrum for its portrayal of the issue, but has also faced criticism for starring Caviezel, who has espoused QAnon conspiracy theories, in the lead role.

     In a statement, Neal Harmon, CEO of Angel Studios, said the company “adhered to the requirements of federal and state laws and regulations in allowing 6,678 people to invest an average of $501 each into the launch of Sound of Freedom.

     “Just as anyone can invest in the stock market, everyone who meets the legal criteria can invest in Angel Studios projects. One of the perks of investing was the ability to be listed in the credits.”

     Why has a lunatic conspiracy theory like Qanon been able to leverage political division in America, and become so powerful that it now has a thinly veiled propaganda film which has outsold major action films, as well as being our new and uniquely American emerging faith? What is the role of fear, especially overwhelming and generalized fear shaped by authority in service to power, in the history of civilization and the metastasized carceral state of force and control as embodied violence and theft of the soul?

     As written by David Smith in The Guardian, in an article entitled ‘It happens again and again’: why Americans are obsessed with secret societies: From the Salem witch trials to QAnon, people have remained fixated on the idea that dark forces are controlling society, explored in a revealing new book; “US congressional hearings can be dry affairs but not of late. First there was Robert Kennedy Jr, purveyor of disinformation about vaccines and much else, testifying about big tech censorship. Then David Grusch, a former intelligence officer, claiming that the government knows more than it admits about UFOs: “Non-human biologics had been recovered at crash sites.”

     The fact that both captured the public imagination is not so surprising. In a new book, Under the Eye of Power, cultural historian Colin Dickey argues that our hunger for conspiracy theories is less fringe and more mainstream than we like to admit. Fearmongering about secret groups pulling levers of power behind the scenes, “conspiring to pervert the will of the people and the rule of law”, is older than America itself. 

     From the 1692 Salem witch trials to the American Revolution (thought by some to be a conspiracy organised by the French), from the satanic panic to the Illuminati and QAnon, it has been tempting to dismiss conspiracy theories as an aberration, resonating with a small and marginal segment of the population. But Dickey, 45, came to understand them as hardwired into how many people process democracy.

     He says via Zoom from a book-lined room in Brooklyn, New York: “When I was a child I was taught that the Salem witch trials and McCarthy hearings – which I think were taught primarily because Arthur Miller’s The Crucible yokes these two instances together – were the outliers, the standouts in American history when things just got out of hand but we’re mostly very sane and rational, the rest of the justice system works and you don’t have to worry too much.

     “But what I found is that those in fact aren’t outliers. I began to see a pattern emerge whereby there’s almost a template for fears of secret societies, of this invisible, undetectable group that is nonetheless doing terrible things behind the scenes.

     “It happens again and again; the names change. Sometimes it’s the Catholics, sometimes it’s the Jews, sometimes it’s the satanists, sometimes it’s the socialists or the anarchists. But it recurs with enough frequency that I began to see it as something that gets deployed almost on cue when certain moments arise in American history.”

     An early example was Freemasonry, the leading fraternal organisation of the 18th century with members including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, James Otis and Paul Revere. What began as a teacher of moral, intellectual and spiritual values came to be regarded with hostility and suspicion.

     Dickey explains: “Freemasonry went from being a positive social philanthropic fraternal organisation that people like Ben Franklin and Washington were proud to be associated with to increasingly being seen as this parallel shadow government that had infiltrated the country and that people were less and less sanguine about having in their midst. They began to fear this idea of a secret society that didn’t seem beholden to the democratic lawmakers of the country.”

    The author also sheds light on attacks on Catholics in the 19th century, driven by a prejudice among Protestants that they were beholden only to a foreign pope and could not act as fully enlightened American citizens.

     “Outside Boston, a convent in 1834 was burned to the ground by people who assumed that the priests were using the confessional as some sort of half blackmail, half mind control device to imprison and sexually enslave women against their will, that there were babies being produced that were then being murdered and buried in the catacombs beneath the ground,” he says.

     “It’s basically very structurally similar to the contemporary conspiracy theory around Pizzagate or the movie that just came out, Sound of Freedom [popular with QAnon followers]. This idea of the cabal of sexual abusers, which was being used against Catholics in the 1830s, with just a few of the key details changed but more or less the same narrative.”

     But something important did shift in the 20th century. Until then most conspiracy theories posited foreign infiltrators trying to harm the American government. If you believed that the US has perfected democracy, it was easier to blame outside saboteurs for anything that went wrong.

     “After world war two and the sixties, that gradually but irrevocably changes to the point where now most Americans take it on an article of faith that the government is out to do them harm on some level or another. Conspiracy theories are often marshalled around this idea that people in the government know more and what’s happening here is the result of government actors,” Dickey says.

     “You see that with 9/11 conspiracy theories and you see it with the JFK assassination. The idea that the head of state was assassinated and yet, for a large part of the population, the only explanation was that the government itself in some form or another was responsible for this is representative of that sea change.”

     There is no doubt that the internet is an important part of the story. Human rights groups blamed anti-Rohingya propaganda on Facebook for inciting a genocide in Myanmar. But the author resists any attempt to shift moral responsibility to social media. It exacerbates some of our latent tendencies, he argues, but those tendencies are there no matter what.

     Dickey sees in QAnon both classic strains of conspiracy theory and some new mutations. “There’s this idea of the government insider who is leaking secret information, which we’ve had historically with something like Watergate and Deep Throat, but also the figure who claims that he has been shown classified information and is sharing them is something you hear in UFO conspiracies time and time again. So that felt very classical.

     “What does seem new is that QAnon is this weird hybrid of a very dangerous, quite racist and homo- and transphobic conspiracy theory mixed with an online multilevel marketing scheme and also a community forum for puzzle solvers,” he says.

     “It is a real blend and synthesis of a bunch of different things that all appeal to slightly different personalities. It’s spread a little wider because it’s able to bring in people who might be otherwise disparate and unconnected and yokes them all under this banner by being vague and nebulous and not attached to too many specific beliefs or practices.”

     Then there is the “great replacement” theory, pushed by rightwing figures such as Tucker Carlson, which describes a supposed elite conspiracy to change the demographics of the US by replacing white people with people of colour, immigrants and Muslims. Dickey notes that such conspiracy theories tend to flare up most predictably when there is significant demographic change or previously marginalised groups push for visibility and equality.

     “Both with the increased visibility of the LGBTQ community and trans men and women demanding rights and equality, alongside the racial and ethnic identity of America changing, as it always has, these things are combining to create a terror among some people who see this change as too rapid, too inexplicable, too destabilising. Rather than admit that America is constantly in flux, they are seizing upon the idea that this is in fact an artificial change brought about by secret elites who are working behind the scenes to undermine what ‘America’ actually is.”

    The phrase “conspiracy theory” was coined by philosopher Karl Popper. In his 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies, he discusses the “conspiracy theory of society”: the idea that major events are the “result of direct design by some powerful individuals and groups”.

     Dickey explains: “The conspiracy theory of society happens when you get rid of God and ask what’s in his place. What I found in writing the book and thinking through my other research in conspiracy theories is what they do is offer an explanatory mechanism for chaos and disorder and randomness, almost to the point of a quasi-theological explanation.

     “Anything that is happening today can be, if you so choose, understood to be part of the incredibly byzantine and hidden plan of the Illuminati that may seem confusing to us on the surface but you can trust as an article of faith that is part of their grand plan. They are both omniscient and omnipotent (unlike God they’re not benevolent) but they are working behind the scenes and that explains the world.

     “Even though that’s a malicious and terrible view of the world, for a segment of the population that is more reassuring than a world of pure chaos and disorder. People will cling to this idea that, yes, well, at least we know that this is part of this malevolent world order, even if it’s evil and out to get us.”

     What makes an enduring conspiracy theory? One element is that they start with a kernel of truth and grounds for doubt. Dickey acknowledges that scepticism is healthy and the impulse that leads to a conspiracy theory is a fine one. Citizens are not obliged to accept everything they are told at face value.

     He says: “Almost any conspiracy theory starts with a legitimate question that I would agree: yeah, let’s look into that, let’s see what we can find. It’s the refusal to accept evidence when the evidence doesn’t pan out in the way that you want it to that leads to problems because then what you have to do is construct an increasingly elaborate conspiratorial framework to explain why you’re not finding the evidence you were hoping for. That’s where you get completely lost in the weeds.”

     From MMR to Covid-19, vaccines have been a prime example of how initially reasonable concerns over possible side-effects can career into an insidious irrationality.

     “I understand that people might be hesitant and have questions, and yet from a legitimate curiosity or understandable hesitation people then spin out to wildly improbable, indefensible and dangerous conspiracy theories. Time and time again the most virulent conspiracy theories often have some kernel of truth which is then being spun in dramatic and horrible directions,” Dickey says.

     Secondly, there is humans’ notoriously short attention span. Dickey writes that conspiracy theories feed on historical amnesia and depend on the belief that what is happening now has never happened before. Many people have therefore been taken aback by former president Donald Trump’s “big lie” of a stolen election and by QAnon, whose followers perceive Democrats are a cabal of Satan worshippers and sex traffickers.

     Dickey says: “A lot of Americans were sort of, ‘Well, how could people possibly believe this nonsense? No one has ever thought something this absurd.’ As a result a lot of us were caught flat-footed and didn’t take these things seriously, didn’t respond fast enough until things were already out of control.

     “What I wanted to do with this book is to lay out that this is almost like a playbook that gets run and that one step to defeating it is being aware that it’s used like this. When the next one comes along – because there will be a next one – maybe we’ll be able to get out ahead of it a little bit faster.”

     Yet acolytes of Trump and QAnon seem impervious to reason. Facts and evidence that contradict their view are attributed to the conspiracy and seen as cause to dig in heels further. Dickey hopes readers of his book will come away with a better understanding of what causes normal, rational and educated people to embrace certain conspiracy theories – and start to think about what they can do to push back on them.

     “What almost never works is barking facts and truth at them because people subscribe to these things because they fulfil an existential or emotional need,” he says. “If I was given the keys to the kingdom and asked what to do about it, I would want to start with addressing people’s emotional concerns there.

     “What is the underlying existential conflict, the cognitive dissonance? What is the thing that is freaking them out, that is leading them to be susceptible to conspiracy theories, and what can we do as a culture and as a nation to address those existential concerns? You don’t debunk the theories unless you first lay the groundwork for an off-ramp for whatever that emotional need is that led them to embrace the theory in the first place.”

      What is the nature and designed purpose of this particular conspiracy theory, Qanon, now poisoning the hearts of America through its mask in the film Sound of Freedom, so indirect and insidious as to foreground all of its moral outrage sugarcoating the pill of fascism with none of its absurd tropes of cannibal diabolism repackaged from those once leveled against the Jews by the Nazis and the Inquisition, and how does its unique history shape it now?

     As I wrote in my post of November 22 2022, Faith Weaponized in Service to Power: a Mad Tyrant Dreams of Return in the Shadows of Thanksgiving and QAnon as Instruments of Authorized National Identity; An amoral plutocrat has handed a global stage to the Fourth Reich and its figurehead Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, now free to make his play for the recapture of America’s Presidency on Elon Musk’s Twitter.

      And in the cause of our division and subjugation the fascists have a powerful weapon of propaganda and falsification, lies and delusions, rewritten history, conspiracy theories and alternate realities of authorized identities of gender, race, faith, and nation; America’s lurid and strange new religion, QAnon.

       As the Pilgrims had Puritanism, the Fourth Reich has QAnon. Only time will tell which is more terrible in its consequences of dehumanization, division, subjugation, the centralization of power to carceral states of force and control, the tyranny and terror of patriarchy, racism, and theocracy, elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.

     As I wrote in my post  of February 28 2022, Origins of the Fourth Reich Part 3: Faith and Madness as Submission to Authority in America’s Lunatic New Religion QAnon; As Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov repeats Putin’s bizarre and preposterous lies and claims of neo-nazism in Ukraine as a casus belli for his invasion and brutal war crimes in a recent speech to the United Nations, what catches my attention is how similar this is to the QAnon conspiracy which repurposes the Nazi propaganda against the Jews used to legitimize the Holocaust; both propaganda campaigns weaponize faith in service to power. Herein the subversion of truth and the degradation of faith combine as submission to authority, falsification of identity, and theft of the soul.

    Who stands between any of us and the Infinite serves neither.

    And as Voltaire teaches us in his 1765 essay Questions sur les miracles; “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

    As written by Pjotr Sauer in The Guardian; “Turn on Russian state television on Friday afternoon and you will see little sign that the country’s missiles are pounding the Ukrainian capital.

     Instead, the full force of the state propaganda machine has been mobilised to portray Moscow’s invasion as a defensive campaign to “liberate” Ukraine, focusing much of its coverage on the alleged protection of the Donbas, supposedly under attack by Kyiv.

     The Russian state news mostly follows Vladimir Putin’s narrative on the war, which he laid out in his address to the nation early on Thursday morning when he announced a limited “special military operation” to “demilitarise” Ukraine and protect citizens in the Donbas from what he claimed was a Ukrainian “genocide”.

     Commenting on a recent statement by the Kremlin official Valentina Matviyenko, who defended the invasion by saying it “ is the only option to stop a brotherly war”, the Telegram user Stalingulag wrote to his 300,000 followers: “This is pure Orwell, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery.”

     So the Russian state is selling its conquest of Ukraine to overthrow a government whose President is Jewish to the Russian people as de-Nazification in defense of its puppet regimes of Donbas and Luhansk. 

     How has this strategy of disinformation played out in the American political context?

     As believers throughout Europe gathered to await the return of Christ at the first millennium and burned all their worldly possessions in public bonfires, the faithful of America’s lunatic new religion QAnon, having failed to consign democracy, America, and western civilization to a Bonfire of the Vanities in the January 6 Insurrection, gathered in Dallas on the anniversary of JFK’s assassination in November of 2021 to await the resurrection of JFK as Trump’s herald who will restore him to glory like British imperialists awaiting the return of King Arthur as the Once and Future King.

    In the protean and mass media created myth of QAnon, originally a diversionary smokescreen for actual child traffickers on 4Chan where it was born which was quickly appropriated by the Fourth Reich and shaped into a modern version of the antisemitic propaganda in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, we can study in real time the genesis of religion as madness in submission to authority.

      As designed by the lies and false histories of those who would enslave us, QAnon weaponizes generalized and overwhelming fear in service to power and connects and enables the messaging widely distributed within the Pentecostal and Gideonite fundamentalist churches and communities which recasts Trump as Cyrus the Great in a new myth of Exile and renders his personal wickedness and depravities irrelevant, for an evil tyrant who gives you what you want can be useful.

      This was the principal lie which won Trump the election of 2016, for which that network of Fascist-Patriarchal churches is equally to blame with Russian sabotage of our elections and the subversion of our democracy through social media and the assault on truth and on journalism, science, and our justice system as sacred callings to pursue verifiable objective truth.

     As in Samuel Beckett’s iconic play, Godot never arrived in the street theatre of submission to authority in Dallas, but we cannot hope that the faithful will realize they have been abandoned by false idols and turn on their masters in rage and vengeance.

     Not without our help to free them from the lies which have captured them.

     We must be truthtellers, and say with Dorothy as she says to the Wizard; “You’re just an old humbug.”

     As I wrote in my post of September 16 2020, A Wilderness of Mirrors: Lies, Illusions, and the Theft of the Soul; As truth becomes uncertain and malleable through the instruments of media and reduces everything to identitarian partisanship, as reality becomes a social consensus model authorized for us by others, as we wander in a wilderness of mirrors, distorted images as if in a funhouse which falsify and abstract us from ourselves in infinite reflections, of misdirects, lies, and illusions, we become colonized by these falsehoods and shaped to the uses of their puppetmasters and those who would enslave us. Thus do we become puppets of the thieves of souls.

     And somewhere in the funhouse, Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, laughs.

      Among the most successful propaganda campaigns of this election season is the QAnon conspiracy narrative, a modern reformulation of the charges against the Jews during the Inquisition which were later repurposed by the Nazis. Of the many great works on this subject, I recommend beginning with a novel by Umberto Eco, The Prague Cemetery; you can read reviews about it on Goodreads in the link which follows.

      “Life imitates Art far more than Art imitates Life”; so argues Oscar Wilde in his 1889 essay The Decay of Lying, a Socratic dialogue in which he deconstructs Aristotle’s theory of mimesis, memory as the basis of identity, and also a critique of Marx’s historical determinism. In this he expanded Keat’s Idealism, “What the imagination seizes as Beauty must be truth—whether it existed before or not”, into an anarchist humanism embracing both political and personal spheres, in which self-creating autonomous individuals are the origin of all meaning and value.

     As such Wilde prefigures Sartre and forms a link between Romantic Idealism and Existentialism; I digress to point this out because Wilde’s breaking of the Great Chain of Being and causality, from the Infinite to kings and priests and then to their subjects, levels hierarchy and social station, interrogates authorized truth, democratizes the ownership of ourselves, and seizes and reclaims our power of choice regarding bodily autonomy and identities of sex and gender.

     In Oscar Wilde’s solution to Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, reality and its imitation shape each other as a recursive process, circular and infinite; and between these mutual negative spaces which create one another like Escher’s Drawing Hands is a liminal interface, full of possibilities and transformative power. The nature and relativity of time, order as an emergent function of chaos, the polymorphism of identity, and the necessity of rebellion against authority which interposes itself between the free conscience and ideas of autonomous individuals and our direct relationship with the Infinite in order to enslave us; all these are major themes of Oscar Wilde; but what is important to us in the context of designed lies and illusions by authority in a political context is that he signals a way out of the maze of propaganda and control which enforces falsification and dehumanization, or simply put the theft of the soul by those who would enslave us.

     If fictions can enslave us to the ideas of other people, our own fictions can also liberate us from them.

     At its best, true art allows us to transcend the limits which ensnare and diminish us; to rise above the troughs of our social position and of exclusionary categories of otherness and divisions from each other and to see the true shape of our possibilities and the seas in which we must swim from the crests of its waves.

    Art is revolutionary struggle which reconnects us and transforms human relationships, reveals new possibilities of becoming human together as yet undreamed, and with these functions of vision, self-ownership, transformation, and seizure of power becomes an instrument and process of Liberty.

     Let us forge an art of being human which returns to us our true selves.

     As I wrote in my post of December 8 2020, A Legacy of Shame and Ruin: Trump’s Fourth Reich Has Failed, But Achieved Its Mission of Subversion of Democracy and the Fall of America as a Guarantor of Liberty and Our Universal Human Rights;  We Americans have wandered in a labyrinth of illusions, lies, and falsifications of ourselves for four years; the question now is whether we can emerge not ruined but renewed and transformed, not dehumanized and subjugated by a malign authority but reforged in solidarity and a compassion for others born of our common human flaws and exalted through our embrace of diversity and inclusion.

     Living at the possible birth of a new humankind as we do, and the dawn of an age of liberty, rebellion against authority, and revolution against systemic and structural inequalities of power and hierarchies of identitarian exclusionary otherness, we must seize the opportunities offered by our current situation.

     Trump’s Fourth Reich has failed, but achieved its mission of subversion of democracy and the Fall of America as a guarantor of liberty and our universal human rights.

     Fascism has done this as it always must, through the assault on truth, and it is the restoration of truth as the basis of trust in all human relationships, and to our interdependence, to which we must now direct our efforts in reversing the tide of tyranny and terror bequeathed to us by the Republicans.

     As Peter Wehner writes in The Atlantic; “We are entering into an epistemological crisis,” Barack Obama recently told my colleague Jeffrey Goldberg.

     The crisis didn’t begin with the Trump presidency, but it rapidly accelerated over the course of its term—and the situation has, if anything, grown worse in the aftermath of the presidential election.

     According to one poll, 70 percent of Republicans say they don’t believe that the 2020 election was free and fair. According to another, 77 percent of Trump backers say President-elect Joe Biden won because of fraud. And a Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 68 percent of Republicans said they were concerned that the 2020 election was “rigged,” and that only 29 percent believed that Biden had “rightfully won.” More than half of Republicans said Trump “rightfully won” but the election was stolen from him because of widespread voter fraud that favored Biden, claims that are hallucinatory.

     This may be Donald Trump’s most enduring legacy—a nihilistic political culture, one that is tribalistic, distrustful, and sometimes delusional, swimming in conspiracy theories. The result is that Americans are disoriented and frustrated, fearful of and often enraged at one another.

     Donald Trump didn’t invent misinformation and disinformation; they have been around for much of human history. But Trump—by virtue of his considerable skills in this area, aided by social media and capitalizing on “truth decay” and diminishing trust in sources of factual information—exploited them more effectively than anyone else has in American history.

    “It was unthinkable before Trump for anyone to run this kind of disinformation campaign from the White House against the American public,” according to Jonathan Rauch, the author of the forthcoming book The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth. As a result, we live in an era defined by epistemic chaos and noetic disarray, one in which a large portion of the population embraces falsehoods and fairy tales and thinks of them as “alternative facts.”

     The deceit being dispensed by Trump & Company is hardly universal, but it is extensive, which is why defeating Trump was essential if we’re going to move away from perspectivism as the interpretive theory in our politics. But objective reality as a concept—truth as something that exists independent of affect, independent of subjective narratives, independent of whatever a partisan information silo claims is true—has been badly damaged. Among the most urgent tasks facing America, then, is to strengthen our regard for what Plato called episteme over doxa, true knowledge over opinion, reality over fantasy.

     Disinformation flourishes in a profoundly polarized society, which America most certainly is. How to depolarize our society is its own challenge, of course, especially when Americans have been subject to Trump’s relentless disinformation campaign for the past half decade.”

     “But not having a president who wakes up every morning thinking of ways to divide Americans by race, region, and religion, by class and party, will be a move in the right direction.”

     “But there is another side as well, which is that, in the words of John Keats, “Beauty is truth, truth beauty.” The line’s meaning is elusive, but Keats seemed to be saying, at least according to some of his interpreters, that truth is not just a philosophical concept; it has an aesthetic quality as well. And beauty itself is tied to truth, to transcendence, to the way things really and truly are. To live one’s life aligned with truth—especially when standing for truth has a cost—is to live a life of integrity and honor. But is that something we even talk about these days?

     Maybe the road out of the epistemic crisis that Barack Obama correctly identified runs not simply, or even primarily, through the realm of politics or social-media reforms, as important as they are. Perhaps the path requires us to order our lives well, remind ourselves and others to love what is worthy of our love, and affirm that “one word of truth shall outweigh the whole world.” We won’t get there tomorrow. But each of us can begin to take steps on the journey tomorrow, a journey out of mist and shadows toward the sunlit uplands.”

     Beyond its many political consequences, Trump’s compulsive lying and inability to distinguish fantasy from reality endangered the lives of his followers when he commanded them to ingest bleach as a cure for covid.

     As I wrote in my post of April 28 2024, Selling Poison: Anniversary of Trump’s Deadly Fake Covid Cure Loyalty Test; Here the deadly loyalty test of a cult leader combines with science denialism as a form of conspiracy theory, and of theocratic terror and subversion of democracy as America’s horrific new religion, QAnon.

     Thus far Traitor Trump has escaped trial for his attempted mass murder of his followers, just as he has not yet been bought a Reckoning for leading an armed insurrection against America, nor for the campaign of arson, looting, and violence by Homeland Security and their deniable assets to disrupt the Black Lives Matter protests as a just cause of war to occupy democratic cities with federal troops, nor for his actions as a Russian spy to clear the way for the invasion of Ukraine by his puppetmaster, nor for the subversion of democracy and the sabotage of our institutions, nor for theocratic patriarchal sexual terror nor white supremacist terror.

     The treasonous and dishonorable crimes against America and all humankind of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, most destructive of all foreign agents who have ever attacked our nation even including 911 and Pearl Harbor, have tested but also exposed the flaws and systems failures of our society and our democracy, and revealed what remains to be done if we are to become a true free society of equals.

     America is now a Wilderness of Mirrors and our democracy performative, a theatre of lies and illusions owned by those who would enslave us, but we see now the man behind the curtain for the humbug that he is, and this is a genie which cannot be put back in its bottle.

     Thanks for showing us all what’s under your masks, Republicans; Treason, Racism, Untruth, Misogyny, Predator.

     And now that the true nature of the enemy stands exposed before history and the stage of the world, our liberation is only a matter of time.

     For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future. 

     As I wrote in my post of April 28 2022, Science Denialism: the Seduction of Magical Thinking; This week marks the anniversary of one of the most bizarre and nonsensical performances Trump ever delivered as our Clown In Chief; his advocacy of injecting bleach and getting a “light inside the body” as a cure for the Pandemic. And fully a year later, a bogus church selling bleach as a miracle cure, which the FDA says causes “severe vomiting, severe diarrhea, life-threatening low blood pressure caused by dehydration and acute liver failure after drinking these products”, was finally shut down and its leaders indicted on federal charges.

    A few days ago my partner Theresa attended a funeral for a cousin who committed suicide by drinking bleach, which destroyed her internal organs within days of agony, after years of crippling pain and total disability dying slowly and even more horrifically from lupus. This is the fate to which Trump condemned his followers as a loyalty test; with the example of Jim Jones before us, one would think we’d have all learned not to drink the Kool Aid.

     Authority serves only its own power, and there is no just authority.

     As an example of science denialism, the bleach episode typifies how authority weaponizes faith to subjugate followers, and the nature of science denialism as conspiracy theory, magical thinking, and an alternate reality of submission to an authority.

    As I wrote in my post of April 24 2020, Absurd Clown of Terror Touts Deadly Snakeoil Cures; Our absurd Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, lets his mask slip and unleashes pandemonium when he touts deadly snake oil cures of injecting or swallowing bleach and “getting light into the body”, the most likely results of which are severe illness and moreover do nothing to cure or prevent viruses.

     Repeating the lunatic claims of cult leader and profiteer of death Mark Grenon, and his promoter, television personality Alan Keyes, Trump rambles witlessly before the world once again, displaying his freakish monstrosity as an idiot madman of delusions and perversions. For beneath the mask lies the demon whom he worships and to whom he would sacrifice America and us all; Moloch the Seducer, Fount of Lies.

     For an excellent interrogation of how tyranny operates through falsification, lies, illusions, rewritten histories, alternate realities, and conspiracy theories in our subjugation, enslavement, and the theft of the soul, see Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season one, episode 8; I, Robot…You, Jane. Crucial to the understanding of conspiracy theories is that Moloch, whose name means King, is claimed as the Big Bad of QAnon; the first principle of propaganda is deflection or to claim your enemies are doing whatever you actually are. The second is to assault the idea of truth itself by exaggerating claims to the point where belief becomes an act of perverted faith and a loyalty test.

    For a brilliant fictionalization of how conspiracy theories work as falsification in the context of QAnon’s previous iteration, the Nazi blood libel against the Jews, read Umberto Eco’s magisterial novel The Prague Cemetery.

Trump’s God: Moloch the Deceiver, Demon of Lies

Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 1 episode 8,  I Robot You Jane

           On the historical Moloch

https://mythologyexplained.com/the-demon-moloch-in-the-bible

          On the reimagination of the assassination attempt as divine intervention and the anointing of a king

To his supporters, Trump is a martyred messiah, resurrected after crucifixion | Sidney Blumenthal

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/18/to-his-supporters-trump-is-a-martyred-messiah-resurrected-after-crucifixion?CMP=share_btn_url

Christian right see God’s hand in Trump rally shooting: ‘The world saw a miracle

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/18/trump-rally-shooting-religious-right?CMP=share_btn_url

      On QAnon as America’s New Fascist Religion and Myth of Exile

Surprise blockbuster ‘Sound of Freedom’ echoes antisemitic QAnon conspiracies/ The Times of Israel

https://www.timesofisrael.com/surprise-blockbuster-sound-of-freedom-echoes-antisemitic-qanon-conspiracies/

‘Sound of Freedom’ Funder Fabian Marta Arrested For Child Kidnapping

https://www.newsweek.com/sound-freedom-funder-fabian-marta-arrest-child-kidnapping-1817498?fbclid=IwAR3kJz_8JyXCBf4txMpNUAwBSbSNqGUafHxmyilcjS3AgVQIJkg-gb8y7R0

The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything, by Mike Rothschild

A Close Reading of the QAnon Shaman Manifesto

‘It happens again and again’: why Americans are obsessed with secret societies

Under the Eye of Power: How Fear of Secret Societies Shapes American Democracy, Colin Dickey

The Prague Cemetery, by Umberto Eco

Caliban and the Witch, by Silvia Federici

                  The Return of the King:  JFK and Trump

Hardcore QAnon Believers, Regular Old JFK Conspiracy Theorists Converge in Dallas

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/trumps-most-malicious-legacy/617319/

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/dangerous-qanon-fringe-seen-creating-a-religion-in-real-time-at-gathering-awaiting-jfk-jr-125340741510

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/qanon-jfk-jr-conspiracy-theorist-convention-dallas-dealey-plaza-1261278/

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2021/11/18/qanon-algorithms-factionalism-jfk-silos-241871

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2021/11/22/why-are-some-qanon-factions-obsessed-with-dallas-and-the-kennedys/

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2021/11/05/arizona-republican-lawmakers-link-qanon-jfk-trump-dallas/6294845001/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10195875/Ex-member-QAnons-JFK-cult-lifts-lid-fraudulent-Dallas-resurrection-Michael-Protzman.html

           On the Fascist Assault on Truth

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-is-testing-the-ways-he-can-distort-reality-online_n_5f57f0dec5b67602f5fd6e8d?ncid=newsltushpmgtrackhate

The Open Society and Its Enemies, Karl Popper

The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth

by Jonathan Rauch

 The Decay of Lying and Other Essays, by Oscar Wilde

              On Science Denialism as a Form of Conspiracy Theory

The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience, by Lee McIntyre

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42068882-the-scientific-attitude

Science Denial: Why It Happens and What to Do about It, by Gale M. Sinatra, Barbara K Hofer (Contributor)

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters, by Steven Pinker

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56224080-rationality

The Enigma of Reason, by Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/32336635-the-enigma-of-reason

All Science Denialism is a Form of Conspiracy Theory

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/03/denialism-what-drives-people-to-reject-the-truth

https://skepticalscience.com/5-characteristics-of-scientific-denialism.html

https://elemental.medium.com/how-identity-not-ignorance-leads-to-science-denial-533686e718fa

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/07/climate-change-denial-scepticism-cynicism-politics

             On Trump’s deadly bleach loyalty test and science denialism

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/25/trump-covid-disinfectant-deborah-birx-book?CMP=share_btn_link

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3095096/aliens-and-reptilians-odd-beliefs-dr-stella

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-fox-news_n_5ebaffdbc5b65b5fd63dac80

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/15/donald-trump-coronavirus-response-world-leaders

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/25/donald-trump-coronavirus-disinfectant-sarcastic-tipping-point

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/24/revealed-leader-group-peddling-bleach-cure-lobbied-trump-coronavirus

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-task-force-disinfectant-briefing_n_6083b866e4b0ee126f66b399?ncid

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bleach-cure-covid-mms-florida-grenon_n_60842357e4b02e74d21a108e?ncid

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/trumps-most-malicious-legacy/617319

              On Russian Propaganda Against Ukraine Which References Hitler’s Reformulation of the Inquisition’s Anti Jewish Propaganda

https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2022/03/01/lavrov-speech-united-nations-russia-ldn-intl-vpx.cnn

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/25/pure-orwell-how-russian-state-media-spins-ukraine-invasion-as-liberation

           On the child witch hunts in Nigeria

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/dec/09/tracymcveigh.theobserver

https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/how-nigerias-fear-child-witchcraft-ruins-young-lives

     Personally I think the Bible was written by madmen and toadies of kings to justify their power, and is nothing but lies and weirdo fantasies. But if you are dialoging with believers, here are some useful authorizations to cite against Traitor Trump in his role as Cyrus the Great in the myth of Exile the enemy’s propaganda network called the Pentecostal Church and other fundamentalists are advocating. And they are claiming divine intervention in the failure of the assassination attempt.

July 17 2024 Traitor Trump Chooses His Successor

     Voldemort, I mean Trump, chooses his successor in the dark reflection of America that is J.D. Vance.

     He does bring something new to the stage that Trump does not have; a beard.

     In fact the political symbolism of the beard may be the most important and most real thing about Vance. To display a beard is to signal a strange and dissonant confluence of the Wild Man archetype and the figure of the Biblical Patriarch, one associated with hippies, anarchists, outlaw bikers, the other with theocratic terrorists and autocratic villains of The Handmaid’s Tale. It is an interesting set of signs to bring into the national political arena, rugged individualism fused with the brutal and grim Old Time Religion of witch hunters and self-righteous enforcers of virtue.

     In America the bearded young hooligans who adopt the iconography of the outcasts and underclass do so as intimidation toward others and as in-group signaling among themselves as members of the white male Christian elite which they imagine as a warrior elect; the ideal recruitment target of the Republican Party. They will not see J.D. Vance as a Yale lawyer and venture capitalist who learned his dark arts at the feet of Peter Thiel, but as one of their own.   

     As written by Eleanor Rycroft in Time, in an article entitled What the History of Beards Reveals About the Changing Meaning of Masculinity; “The stereotypical image of a Renaissance man wears a ruff, a doublet and hose perhaps, and, very probably, a beard. And with good reason. The 16th and early 17th centuries saw a remarkable and ubiquitous fashion for facial hair among men. Physicians wrote about them, Protestant reformers grew them, poets satirized them and playwrights, from Shakespeare to Jonson, Middleton, Fletcher and beyond, repeatedly used them to demonstrate masculinity to their audiences. Benedick shaves back his to impress Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing, while the “Seven Ages of Man” speech in As You Like It includes a soldier “bearded like the pard” and a “Justice” with “beard of formal cut.” Indeed, of the plays in the 1623 Folio, only four do not mention beards. Shakespeare was heavily invested in the language of beards when he imagined his male characters.

     Why did beards suddenly become important? The question proves difficult to answer because moments of mass-beardedness in history occur randomly and involve different models of masculinity, causes, effects and durations. The historian Christopher Oldstone-Moore identifies “four great beard movements” that punctuate the history of masculinity — the second century, the High Middle Ages, the Renaissance and the latter half of the 19th century. Arguably we are currently at the beginning of a fifth age, though time will tell whether this is merely a moment of fashion or something more. Certainly beards have been current and widespread for the last 20 years and the term “hipster beard” is idiomatic.

     While there are no universal triggers for “great beard movements,” we might venture that the early modern period was a time of enormous change — religious, economic, political, cultural and medical. Old systems of thought came under pressure as feudalism gave way to proto-capitalism and Catholicism to Protestantism, and the political system moved towards modern democracy. During such upheaval, it is unsurprising that ideas of gender come under scrutiny, too. Here the one-sex model of gender is important — an inheritance of classical antiquity enshrined in the works of Aristotle and Galen, which saw women as simply “imperfect” men who lacked the requisite humoural heat to eject their inverted penises from their bodies. Facial hair functioned as evidence of the male capacity to produce semen, puberty providing the necessary testicular heat for a boy to become a man, but also for “smoke” to rise in the body and push out hair in the face. As much as menstruation signaled a girl’s capacity to reproduce, the beard did the same for a boy.

    The beard was the boundary that separated men from boys in early modern thought and we can assume that, whenever the term “boy” was used, its object was a beardless or incompletely bearded male. In the latter instance it was usually an insult, an impugning of the youth’s unfinished manliness, as in William Cartwright’s The Ordinary (1635), when Credulous asserts his authority over Meanwell by saying: “You’re a beardless boy / I’m the father of children.” Puberty is known to have occurred later in the early modern era so men may have been seen as boys well into their late teens or early 20s. This has important implications for the so-called “all male stage” of the Renaissance. Boys might have played women for much longer than we expect and the phase of beard-growth was almost certainly used by playwrights when constructing characters. The portrayal of teenagers onstage and their frequent association with trickery and deception — from the cheeky servants of citizen comedy through to the outright criminality of Hal and his fellows in the Henry IV plays — suggests that the ambiguity represented by imperfectly bearded youths was viewed as a threat by wider society.

      The unusual emphasis placed on the beard to determine manliness made it a powerful symbol in the theater. While it is likely that actors would have used their own facial hair when performing, there is plenty of evidence from the records of local amateur drama, university inventories, as well as the accounts of the Royal Wardrobe, that false beards were a key feature of early modern dramaturgy. Tied on with strings or attached with glue, prosthetic beards were a crucial part of theatrical costume. In addition, false beards were a frequent and recurring feature in the many disguise plots of early modern drama. The idea is clearly articulated by Longaville in Beaumont and Fletcher’s The Honest Man’s Fortune (1613) when he says that “disguises must wear beards.” Given the onus placed on beards in the early modern conception of manhood, this raises interesting questions about the mutability of manhood itself. False beards destabilized the very stability of the sign that they exploited.

     The early modern stage teems with differently colored beards – red, black, brown, grey, even blue, purple and yellow – all cut into various forms – the spade, the pique-devant, the cathedral, the swallow-tail – each representing its own slice of masculinity which an audience was expected to decode. A pique-devant, or pointy beard, became a courtier, while a spade beard suggested a soldier. “Greybeard,” meanwhile, was an omnipresent term used to denote ageing men. Paradoxically the greybeard invoked both wisdom and good counsel on the one hand and folly and declining faculties on the other. Depictions of the greybeard show that the benefits of patriarchy such as economic power and social status were limited, extended only to those in the prime of manhood.

     Indeed, the stage reveals that manliness was inherently unstable. Men were often pitted against each other in competition for authority, a process that sometimes literally involved “bearding” – or the pulling or tweaking of another man’s facial hair during conflict as a way of diminishing his manhood. This is what Hamlet means when he asks a newly bearded player arrived at court, “com’st thou to beard me in Denmark?”

     The dramatic uses of the sign of Renaissance masculinity par excellence — the beard — reveal how precarious, provisional and potentially groundless the ideology of early modern masculinity was, the very ideology upon which the sign-system of the stage relied. As we look at today’s hipsters — beards, man-buns and tattoos aplenty — we may also wonder what lies beneath the surface of the identities that they construct.”

     So for the semiotics of the forces of conservatism and the Republican Party as it seeks a new image of masculinity as a rallying point for its target audience of alienated and disenfranchised youth seething with rage to be directed in service to power.

     The true design and purpose of the Republican Party now is to perpetuate and enforce patriarchal-theocratic and white supremacist elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege by offering young men membership, which secures the dominion of the older men who control it.

     Vance’s wife is another kind of beard, a nonwhite Hindu Indian and fellow Yale lawyer who shields him from being tainted by the regressive social policies of his chosen Party and its white supremacist and Christian Identity ideologies through political blackface.

     Who is the real J.D. Vance?    

      As written by Zack Beauchamp in Vox, in an article entitled What J.D. Vance really believes: The dark worldview of Trump’s choice for vice president, explained; “I met Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH), Donald Trump’s new choice for vice president, in the summer of 2022. I was covering a conservative conference in Israel, and Vance was the surprise VIP attraction. We chatted for a bit about the connections between right-wing movements across the world, and what American conservatives could learn from foreign peers. He was friendly, thoughtful, and smart — much smarter than the average politician I’ve interviewed.

     Yet his worldview is fundamentally incompatible with the basic principles of American democracy.

     Vance has said that, had he been vice president in 2020, he would have carried out Trump’s scheme for the vice president to overturn the election results. He has fundraised for January 6 rioters. He once called on the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into a Washington Post columnist who penned a critical piece about Trump. After last week’s assassination attempt on Trump, he attempted to whitewash his radicalism by blaming the shooting on Democrats’ rhetoric about democracy without an iota of evidence.

     This worldview translates into a very aggressive agenda for a second Trump presidency. In a podcast interview, Vance said that Trump should “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat” in the US government and “replace them with our people.” If the courts attempt to stop this, Vance says, Trump should simply ignore the law.

     “You stand before the country, like Andrew Jackson did, and say the chief justice has made his ruling, now let him enforce it,” he declares.

     The President Jackson quote is likely apocryphal, but the history is real. Vance is referring to an 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the US government needed to respect Native legal rights to land ownership. Jackson ignored the ruling, and continued a policy of allowing whites to take what belonged to Natives. The end result was the ethnic cleansing of about 60,000 Natives — an event we now call the Trail of Tears.

     For most Americans, this history is a deep source of shame: an authoritarian president trampling on the rule of law to commit atrocities. For Vance, it is a well of inspiration.

     J.D. Vance is a man who believes that the current government is so corrupt that radical, even authoritarian steps, are justified in response. He sees himself as the avatar of America’s virtuous people, whose political enemies are interlopers scarcely worthy of respect. He is a man of the law who believes the president is above it.

     The authoritarian wing of the authoritarian party

J.D. Vance wasn’t always like this.

     He grew up poor in Middletown, Ohio — escaping a difficult childhood to make it to Yale Law and, subsequently, to the lucrative world of venture capital. This narrative served as the backbone of his 2016 book, Hillbilly Elegy, that turned into a mega-bestseller: a book that seemed to explain Trump’s appeal to America’s downtrodden. It put Vance on the national map.

     The Vance of Hillbilly Elegy was very different politically. Back then, he took a conventional conservative line on poverty, describing the working class as beset by a cultural pathology encouraged by federal handouts and the welfare state.

    2016 Vance was also an ardent Trump foe. He wrote a New York Times op-ed titled “Mr. Trump Is Unfit For Our Nation’s Highest Office,” and wrote a text to his law school roommate warning that Trump might be “America’s Hitler.”

     Eight years later, Vance has metamorphosed into something else entirely. Today, he pitches himself as an economic populist and cosponsors legislation with Sen. Elizabeth Warren curtailing pay for failed bankers. In an even more extreme shift, he has morphed into one of Trump’s leading champions in the Senate — backing the former president to the hilt and even, at times, outpacing him in anti-democratic fervor.

     When I spoke to Georgia state Sen. Josh McLaurin (D) — the former law school roommate who had received Vance’s “America’s Hitler” text — I asked him how the Vance he knew evolved into the Vance we see today.

     “The through line between former J.D. and current J.D. is anger,” McLaurin told me. “The Trump turn can be understood as a lock-in on contempt as the answer to anger” — specifically, contempt directed at Vance’s political enemies.

     McLaurin’s comments suggest that Vance’s conversion to Trumpism is genuine. I’m inclined to agree, though the timing of his MAGA conversion surely is convenient: He converted to right-wing populism just in time to run for a vacant seat in Trumpy Ohio.

    Ultimately, whether Vance truly believes what he’s saying is secondary to the public persona he’s chosen to adopt. Politicians are not defined by their inner lives, but the decisions that they make in public — the ones that actually affect law and policy. Those choices are deeply shaped by the constituencies they depend on and the allies they court.

     And it is clear that Vance is deeply ensconced in the GOP’s growing “national conservative” faction, which pairs an inconsistent economic populism with an authoritarian commitment to crushing liberals in the culture war.

     Vance has cited Curtis Yarvin, a Silicon Valley monarchist blogger, as the source of his ideas about firing bureaucrats and defying the Supreme Court. His Senate campaign was funded by Vance’s former employer, Peter Thiel, a billionaire who once wrote that “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

     He’s a big fan of Patrick Deneen, a Notre Dame professor who recently wrote a book calling for “regime change” in America. Vance spoke at an event for Deneen’s book in Washington, describing himself as a member of the “postliberal right” who sees his job in Congress as taking an “explicitly anti-regime” stance.

     Vance is also an open admirer of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, a right-wing politician who has systematically torn his country’s democracy apart. Vance praised Orbán’s approach to higher education in particular, saying he “made some smart decisions there that we could learn from in the United States.” The policies in question involve using national dollars to impose state controls over universities, turning them into vehicles for disseminating the government line.

     In a profile of Vance, Politico reporter Ian Ward quotes multiple leading Republican figures — specifically, the leaders of the faction trying to turn these postliberal ideas into practice — saying that they see Vance as a leading advocate for their cause.

     Top Trump advisor (and current federal inmate) Steve Bannon told Ward that Vance is “at the nerve center of this movement.” Kevin Roberts, the president of the right-wing Heritage Foundation and the driving force behind Project 2025, told Ward that “he is absolutely going to be one of the leaders — if not the leader — of our movement.”

     Enacting Trump’s dark ambitions

     There is little doubt that Vance will continue in this role if elected vice president. He would enable all of Trump’s worst instincts, and put a brake on none — deploying his considerable intellectual and intrapersonal gifts toward bending the government to Trump’s will.

     In Trump’s first term, he faced considerable opposition from inside his own administration. People like Defense Secretary James Mattis and Vice President Mike Pence served as brakes on Trump’s most radical impulses, challenging or even refusing to implement his (illegal) directives.

     Vance’s ascendance represents the death of this “adults in the room” model. Backed by people drawn from the lists of loyal staffers being prepared by places like Heritage, Vance would not only support Trump’s radical impulses but seems likely to spearhead efforts to implement them.

     He would be a direct conduit from the shadowy world of far-right influencers, where Curtis Yarvin is a respected voice and Viktor Orbán a role model, straight to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

     In 2004, Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean described himself as hailing from “the Democratic wing of the Democratic party.” If the GOP under Trump has indeed evolved into an authoritarian party, then Vance hails from its authoritarian wing.”

     Who stands with Trump? Who among us claims a Russian agent whose mission is the end of democracy and the dawn of a theocratic Fourth Reich of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror?

     His Vice Presidential nominee and chosen successor for one, at least for the moment and in public, a fake hillbilly who despises him, a choice which allows Trump to co-opt his internal opposition.

     It is now official; we are become a nation of Jethros.

      By this I do not intend to disparage the comedy of The Beverly Hillbillies; indeed I regard Jed as a hero because he does not allow his circumstances to define or change him, and rewatch the show now and then which tries the patience of my partner Theresa whose taste runs to dreadful English mysteries. But as a figure of a performative false Common Man like the Yale lawyer and venture capitalist J.D. Vance and many elite hegemons who create and enforce their own wealth, power, and privilege through deception and the lies and illusions of identity politics, Jethro as a character works very well.

     This also tells us precisely what the Republican Party thinks of its voters; what their base and the electorate at large think of them remains to be seen.

A Portrait of J.D. Vance:

Best of Jethro | #TheBeverlyHillbillies

A Portrait of Trump:

The Magicians: Fear, Power, Force, and the Origins of Evil

JD Vance: six takeaways from Trump’s pick of the Ohio senator as running mate

What J.D. Vance really believes

The dark worldview of Trump’s choice for vice president, explained.

https://www.vox.com/politics/360283/jd-vance-trump-vp-vice-president-authoritarian?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR10gkDo2R9oXaksJDDAIU3nxOWGZI75NttcPSUVwePzbWGBoHiU_EG3kDA_aem_2QdFVF5uQdiBzTpOsx9P7Q

Never doubt the instincts of Donald Trump, who just appointed ‘never Trump guy’ as his running mate/ Marina Hyde

From anti-Trump to vice-president nominee: JD Vance in his own words

JD Vance once worried Trump was ‘America’s Hitler’. Now his own authoritarian leanings come into view

Vice-presidential pick has said he would have blocked certification of 2020 results in key states won by Biden

Who is Usha Vance, the Indian American lawyer married to JD Vance?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/17/who-is-usha-vance-jd-vance-wife?CMP=share_btn_url

What the History of Beards Reveals About the Changing Meaning of Masculinity

https://time.com/5669816/beard-history/

Lincoln Had One. So Did Uncle Sam.

Why don’t politicians today grow beards?

https://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/04/beards_in_politics_there_hasn_t_been_a_bearded_major_party_presidential_nominee_in_almost_100_years_why_.html

Hillbilly: A Cultural History of an American Icon, by Anthony Harkins

Hillbilly Elegy Review, Jacobin

https://jacobin.com/2016/10/hillbilly-elegy-review-jd-vance-national-review-white-working-class-appalachia?sfnsn=mo

I’m from Appalachia. JD Vance doesn’t represent us – he only represents himself

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/16/jd-vance-hillbilly-elegy-appalachia?CMP=share_btn_url

July 16 2024 Party of Treason Show Day One: Theft of Public Wealth Through Deregulation, Privatization, and Austerity As the Neoliberal Order Collapses in the Death Spiral of Capitalism

     On this first day of the Party of Treason show, wherein the Daddy Warbucks of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege and their apologists, power brokers, and bottom feeding grifters spin lies and illusions to subjugate the treasonous and dishonorable minions of their base and anoint Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump as their idolatrous dark god and king, they have chosen the theme of wealth; which means theft of public wealth through privatization, deregulation which means theft of the rights of citizens and of the laborers who create the wealth for those who would enslave us, and a tax structure which centralizes wealth and power and transforms terminal stage capitalism from corporate to oligarchic or inherited wealth as subversion of democracy and the re-emergence of an aristocratic elite.

     As capitalism and the Neoliberal Order embraced by both Democrats and Republicans begins to collapse from the mechanical failures of its internal contradictions, the Party of Treason offers the plutocrat class theft of public wealth as the emergence of a quasi-aristocracy and the subversion of democracy to a monarchy like tyranny.  

      Who stands with Trump? Who among us claims a Russian agent whose mission is the end of democracy and the dawn of a theocratic Fourth Reich of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror?

     Those who wish permission to commit such crimes of terror against their fellow citizens and human beings, and to enforce and institutionalize systems of unequal power and oppression.

     His Vice Presidential nominee and chosen successor for one, at least for the moment and in public, a fake hillbilly who despises him, a choice which allows Trump to co-opt his internal opposition. It is now official; we are become a nation of Jethros.

       But it is not the bizarre clowns and freaks who lead the Party of Treason who worry me truly; it is the grey eminences and faceless men who service and control the great machine of our commodification, falsification, and dehumanization and its systems of oppression of whom I now write, because the first theme of this coronation, wealth and its disparity as unequal power and elite membership as identity politics, is also a central issue of tyranny versus liberty and of the futures of America and humankind which we must now choose between.

      For all of this has been tried before, by Milton Friedman and his Chicago Boys in Chile as a laboratory and in America and elsewhere since Reagan, and it has failed. Austerity, privatization, deregulation, and a tax free plutocrat class are both symptoms and causes of our civilizational economic and political collapse.

      And such policies will fail us now and always, as democracies become tyrannies and our world dies.

        This we must resist, and unite in rage against the dying of the light.

        In preface to any interrogations of the Republican Party, we must center our idea and discourse of it in the one inescapable and defining fact of the January 6 Insurrection.

        As I wrote in my post of February 11 2021, Profiles in Treason and Terror; The dishonorable and the mad, the delusional and the sadistic epicures of brutality and perversions, the feral predators hooting and champing before the gallows and guillotines they have brought to murder members of congress with and their partners in uniform unleashing racist terror and gun violence in the streets, and the amoral and predatory grifters and puppetmasters of fascism who have subjugated and enslaved them and stolen their honor and their souls; these are among the idolators of Traitor Trump who conspired, enabled, and collaborated in his plot to subvert democracy and overthrow America in the January 6 Insurrection which attempted to seize Congress and execute its members, which like Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch on which it was modeled was intended to decapitate the government of the people in a single stroke.

     As details emerge of the internal operations and massive scale of the plot against America, in terms of its central coordination and logistics under direct operational command of Trump and his cabal of conspirators, we are offered not only the spectacle of his aberrance and monstrosity as a mad idiot Clown of Terror drooling and gloating in bestial depravity at the destruction of our values and institutions, the violation of our ideals and the endless suffering he has caused, but of those of his freakish and degenerate followers as well.

        As I wrote in my post of August 25 2020, Welcome to Bizarro World, Where Truth and Lies Change Places and All Our Values Are Reversed; The Republican Party held up a mirror to America in the figure of Trump at last night’s National Convention, and I’m hoping most of us didn’t like what we saw.

      A funhouse mirror, filled with distorted images, a thing of surfaces without substance offering a mirage of illusions, lies, and reflections into infinite regress of our atavisms of fear and hate, shadows which we drag behind us in our wake like an invisible reptilian tail, and which like the picture of Dorian Grey reveal our disfigured souls and our failures as Americans and as human beings.

     It is an image designed to terrorize us into submission, and to steal our souls.

      Among the freaks and monsters, the litanies of victimhood and retribution, of dominion, white supremacy, patriarchy, and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil sung by the barkers and screaming johnnies who warmed up the main show, among all these and reigning over them like a ringmaster was the tyrant himself, Traitor Trump, spewing abominations and depravities as the puppet of the demons he worships, the lies of those who would enslave us.

     Thanks for showing us what’s under your masks, Republicans; Treason, Racism, Untruth, Misogyny, Predator.

     So for the nature and character of the Republicans and their Party of Treason; next for the centrality of the theft of public wealth to fascism as amorality and dehumanization.

     As I wrote in my post of February 26 2022, Origins of the Fourth Reich Part Two: Ayn Rand, Philosopher of American Fascism and the Republican Party of Kleptocracy, Deregulation, and Privatization; As the fourth day of the invasion of Ukraine dawns, with it dawns a hope that it may be faltering; little girl scouts and grandparents and everyone in between are taking their places in the line of battle, grinning as they prepare to match rifles against tanks, artillery, and unquestionable airspace control, Polish and other Allied soldiers are fighting alongside the Ukrainian army, major arms shipments are getting through the Russian sea blockade, President Zelensky has become a national hero for patrolling the streets of Kyiv with his soldiers, and the SWIFT banking system boycott has frozen the banks of the Russian state.

    Most important of all, ordinary citizens are confronting tanks, and the tanks are stopping. Besides all of the triumph and tragedy of the Allied side, the solidarity of the Russian people has been magnificent; sustained peace protests continue despite brutal repression and media blackout, Putin’s stronghold of St Petersburg is now in open revolt against his regime, and both spontaneous mutinies and desertions by Russian soldiers and a stunning peace movement within the armed forces, which recalls the one in America that stopped the Vietnam War, have brought the invasion to a standstill in coordination with suicidal last stands by the Ukrainians.

      Solidarity between the peoples of Russia and Ukraine may bring peace and freedom to both nations.

     This new possibility, longshot though it may be, returns me to the central question of the invasion; why is this happening? Who benefits?

     Part of the spectacle of our civilization once again collapsing due to its internal contradictions as mechanical failure which we are witnessing in the conquest of the Ukraine by Russia’s imperial oligarchic kleptocracy is nothing more or less than capital trying to free itself from its host political systems.

     This is why sanctions directly against Russia’s oligarchs as ruling clan chieftains, which has cost them nearly 40 billion dollars in three days, strikes at the heart of an unequal system which now threatens to consume not only Ukraine, but the Baltic states and much of Europe, and why the armed forces of Poland and other allied nations are at this moment fighting Russia’s invasion forces in Ukraine.

    But oligarchy, plutocracy, and stateless corporatism is common throughout the world, and as a key component, sponsor, and driving force of fascist tyranny which has instrumentalized fear in service to power through divisions of patriarchal, racial, and sectarian violence and national identity, capital as elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege has captured many nations as a global Fourth Reich, among them America during the Trump puppet regime as a fief and colony of Russia.

    How did the Fourth Reich seize America, beyond Putin and Trump?   

    We inherit the consequences of three major trigger events which caused this condition; the capture of the Republican Party by Gideonite fundamentalists in 1980, the emergence of an Imperial militarized state of secret power and surveillance and the counterinsurgency model of policing after 911, and the massive transfer of public wealth to a handful of plutocrats and oligarchs through privatization and the co-optation of our government by corporate ownership which began with the broad adoption of Ayn Rand’s amoral and nihilistic philosophy of power by major business schools and its implementation as national economic policy by her acolyte Milton Friedman, abetted by the Koch brothers creation of an academic and political support structure, and coming to terrible fruition in Citizens United and the institutionalization of corruption and de facto corporate rule.

     Ayn Rand is an apologist for amoral nihilism, who based her twisted ideas on Molotov’s anarchism of violence. If Hannibal Lecter had written a literary justification for eating people as a natural right because he’s superior to everyone else and no one can stop him, it would sound like Ayn Rand saying rape is okay because the natural order is one of predator and prey, and only power is real and has meaning, as she declares with the infamous words of her amoral and disgusting protagonist in The Fountainhead; “The question isn’t who is going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me.”

    There is a line spoken by the villain in the series The Magicians, possibly the finest portrayal of Donald Trump as an archetypal figure of psychopaths and tyrants in fiction, a survivor of childhood abuse named The Beast for his horrific crimes, once the powerless and terrified Martin Chatwin and now like Saturn a monstrous cannibal god; “You know, when I was a boy, a man who was meant to care for me bent me over his desk and had me over and over every time I was alone with him. It helps me understand a truth. You’re powerful or you’re weak.”

      Here is the original lie of the tyrant and the fascist in the apologetics and self-justification of power; the lie that only power has meaning, that there is no good or evil. How we use power is of equal importance as who holds it.

      Fear and power are a primary means of human exchange, but not the only means; love, interdependence, membership, and belonging are as important.

     The great question which democracy attempts to answer is how to balance the rights and needs of individuals so that none may infringe upon another’s; and this is precisely the relationship which tyranny seeks to disrupt and imbalance as unequal power.

      The harnessing of weaponized faith to the amoral nihilism of Ayn Rand’s philosophy of terror, rapine, and plunder, which she developed from Stalin’s propagandist Molotov and Hitler’s theoretician Julius Streicher, and was distributed pervasively throughout our economics and business schools and came to direct national policy under her acolyte Milton Freidman, formed the ideological basis for our descent into fascism, which adds plutocratic capitalism to authoritarian tyranny under the fig leaf of Gideonite fundamentalist patriarchy and sexual terror, and is driven and typified by divisions of exclusionary otherness, hierarchies of belonging, and fascisms of blood as racist terror, faith as sectarian terror, and soil as nationalism and identity politics.

     How does this play out as economic policy and its political consequences? To see where such policies inevitably lead, we need look no further than our sister state, Chile.

     Chile, a nation with a middle class who scavenges garbage mounds amidst fantastic wealth, provides a case study of the effects of privatization and deregulation; for it is American policies which have failed here, ones we have embraced ourselves. The Chicago Boys, economists whom the tyrant Pinochet installed in 1973 to create a firewall against socialism, had been students of Milton Friedman, a devotee of Ayn Rand’s fascist and nihilistic philosophy of might makes right, who oversaw the remaking of America through an assault on our institutions of social justice and the theft of public wealth through privatization.

     As for Ayn Rand, and her sources and references Julius Streicher and Vyacheslav Molotov; her work is for fascist predators and psychopaths only, and if applied to society at large as the Trump Republicans and aligned extremists would have us, would result in a society in which the most ruthless criminal rules.

     If anyone mentions her favorably, don’t walk, run. Because you are in the presence of a monster.

     As I wrote in my post of July 29 2019, Why Do Plutocrats Fund Nationalist Tyrants; The death spiral of capitalism in its final phase, in which wealth concentrates in the hands of a few plutocratic oligarchs and like a parasite in nature dies as it kills its host, need not end with the total collapse of the global economy. Make the rich pay, says George Monbiot in The Guardian, and through taxation of unearned income we can break “the spiral of patrimonial wealth accumulation”.

     His analysis of the rise of tyranny as driven by the changing nature of capitalism is insightful and clear; “everywhere the killer clowns are taking over. Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage, Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Jair Bolsonaro, Scott Morrison, Rodrigo Duterte, Matteo Salvini, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Viktor Orbán and a host of other ludicrous strongmen.

   The question is why? Why are the technocrats who held sway almost everywhere a few years ago giving way to extravagant buffoons?

    Social media, an incubator of absurdity, is certainly part of the story. But while there has been plenty of good work investigating the means, there has been surprisingly little thinking about the ends. Why are the ultra-rich, who until recently used their money and newspapers to promote charisma-free politicians, now funding this circus? Why would capital wish to be represented by middle managers one moment and jesters the next?

   The reason, I believe, is that the nature of capitalism has changed. The dominant force of the 1990s and early 2000s – corporate power – demanded technocratic government. It wanted people who could simultaneously run a competent, secure state and protect profits from democratic change.

    The policies that were supposed to promote enterprise – slashing taxes for the rich, ripping down public protections, destroying trade unions – instead stimulated a powerful spiral of patrimonial wealth accumulation. The largest fortunes are now made not through entrepreneurial brilliance but through inheritance, monopoly and rent-seeking: securing exclusive control of crucial assets such as land and buildings privatised utilities and intellectual property, and assembling service monopolies such as trading hubs, software and social media platforms, then charging user fees far higher than the costs of production and delivery. In Russia, people who enrich themselves this way are called oligarchs. But this is a global phenomenon. Today corporate power is overlain by – and mutating into – oligarchic power.

     What the oligarchs want is not the same as what the old corporations wanted. In the words of their favoured theorist, Steve Bannon, they seek the “deconstruction of the administrative state”. Chaos is the profit multiplier for the disaster capitalism on which the new billionaires thrive. Every rupture is used to seize more of the assets on which our lives depend. The chaos of an undeliverable Brexit, the repeated meltdowns and shutdowns of government under Trump: these are the kind of deconstructions Bannon foresaw. As institutions, rules and democratic oversight implode, the oligarchs extend their wealth and power at our expense.

     The killer clowns offer the oligarchs something else too: distraction and deflection. While the kleptocrats fleece us, we are urged to look elsewhere. We are mesmerised by buffoons who encourage us to channel the anger that should be reserved for billionaires towards immigrants, women, Jews, Muslims, people of colour and other imaginary enemies and customary scapegoats. Just as it was in the 1930s, the new demagoguery is a con, a revolt against the impacts of capital, financed by capitalists.

    The oligarch’s interests always lie offshore: in tax havens and secrecy regimes. Paradoxically, these interests are best promoted by nationalists and nativists. The politicians who most loudly proclaim their patriotism and defence of sovereignty are always the first to sell their nations down the river. It is no coincidence that most of the newspapers promoting the nativist agenda, whipping up hatred against immigrants and thundering about sovereignty, are owned by billionaire tax exiles, living offshore.

     As economic life has been offshored, so has political life. The political rules that are supposed to prevent foreign money from funding domestic politics have collapsed. The main beneficiaries are the self-proclaimed defenders of sovereignty who rise to power with the help of social media ads bought by persons unknown, and thinktanks and lobbyists that refuse to reveal their funders. A recent essay by the academics Reijer Hendrikse and Rodrigo Fernandez argues that offshore finance involves “the rampant unbundling and commercialisation of state sovereignty” and the shifting of power into a secretive, extraterritorial legal space, beyond the control of any state. In this offshore world, they contend, “financialised and hypermobile global capital effectively is the state. 

    Today’s billionaires are the real citizens of nowhere. They fantasise, like the plutocrats in Ayn Rand’s terrible novel Atlas Shrugged, about further escape.

To them, the nation state is both facilitator and encumbrance, source of wealth and imposer of tax, pool of cheap labour and seething mass of ungrateful plebs, from whom they must flee.

     Defending ourselves from oligarchy means taxing it to oblivion. It’s easy to get hooked up on discussions about what tax level maximises the generation of revenue. There are endless arguments about the Laffer curve, which purports to show where this level lies. But these discussions overlook something crucial: raising revenue is only one of the purposes of tax. Another is breaking the spiral of patrimonial wealth accumulation.

     Breaking this spiral is a democratic necessity: otherwise the oligarchs, as we have seen, come to dominate national and international life. The steepest taxes would be better aimed at accumulated unearned wealth.” 

Inside the Republican National Convention

(Sideshow | Official Trailer)

Keynote Speech at the Republican National Convention

(General Ursus, speech from Beneath The planet of the Apes)

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/13/why-is-inequality-booming-in-chile-blame-the-chicago-boys

https://aeon.co/ideas/philosophy-shrugged-ignoring-ayn-rand-wont-make-her-go-away

May 5 2024 Let us Dream a New Post-Capitalist Society: Karl Marx, on his birthday

April 2 2024 How American Imperialism Created Our Humanitarian Crisis at the Border: Consequences of Operation Condor

May 1 2024 A Festival in Red and Green, As the World Burns: May Day

                Diagnosing Failures, a reading list

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Naomi Klein

Reality Ignored: How Milton Friedman and Chicago Economics Undermined American Institutions and Endangered the Global Economy,Kenneth M. Davidson

Chile: The Pinochet Decade: The Rise and Fall of the Chicago Boys, Phil O’Brien,

Jackie Roddick

Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, Mark Blyth

Austerity: The Demolition of the Welfare State and the Rise of the Zombie Economy, Kerry-Anne Mendoza

The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism, Clara E. Mattei

And the Weak Suffer What They Must?: Europe, Austerity and the Threat to Global Stability, Yanis Varoufakis

Contours of Descent: U.S. Economic Fractures and the Landscape of Global Austerity, Robert Pollin

Welfare State: Privatisation, Deregulation and Commercialisation of Public Services, Dexter Whitfield

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6079069-welfare-state

                   Finding Solutions, a reading list

The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality, by Bhaskar Sunkara

On Fire: The Case for the Green New Deal, Naomi Klein

American Democratic Socialism: History, Politics, Religion, and Theory,

Gary Dorrien

Beyond Capital: Toward a Theory of Transition, István Mészáros

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/189698.Beyond_Capital

Beyond Leviathan: Critique of the State, István Mészáros, John Bellamy Foster

 (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58291950-beyond-leviathan

The Communist Manifesto: with an introduction by Yanis Varoufakis

by Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx, David Aaronovitch (Introduction)

The Relevance of the Communist Manifesto, by Slavoj Žižek

Uncle Bernie’s speech to students at George Washington University in June of 2019

““What I believe is that the American people deserve freedom – true freedom. Freedom is an often used word but it’s time we took a hard look at what that word actually means. Ask yourself: what does it actually mean to be free?

Are you truly free if you are unable to go to a doctor when you are sick, or face financial bankruptcy when you leave the hospital?

Are you truly free if you cannot afford the prescription drug you need to stay alive?

Are you truly free when you spend half of your limited income on housing, and are forced to borrow money from a payday lender at 200% interest rates.

Are you truly free if you are 70 years old and forced to work because you lack a pension or enough money to retire?

Are you truly free if you are unable to go to attend college or a trade school because your family lacks the income?

Are you truly free if you are forced to work 60 or 80 hours a week because you can’t find a job that pays a living wage?

Are you truly free if you are a mother or father with a new born baby but you are forced to go back to work immediately after the birth because you lack paid family leave?

Are you truly free if you are a small business owner or family farmer who is driven out by the monopolistic practices of big business?

Are you truly free if you are a veteran, who put your life on the line to defend this country, and now sleep out on the streets?

To me, the answer to those questions, in the wealthiest nation on earth, is no, you are not free.

While the Bill of Rights protects us from the tyranny of an oppressive government, many in the establishment would like the American people to submit to the tyranny of oligarchs, multinational corporations, Wall Street banks, and billionaires.

It is time for the American people to stand up and fight for their right to freedom, human dignity and security. This is the core of what my politics is all about.

In 1944, FDR proposed an economic bill of rights but died a year later and was never able to fulfill that vision. Our job, 75 years later, is to complete what Roosevelt started.

That is why today, I am proposing a 21st Century Economic Bill of Rights.

A Bill of Rights that establishes once and for all that every American, regardless of his or her income is entitled to:

* The right to a decent job that pays a living wage

* The right to quality health care

* The right to a complete education

* The right to affordable housing

* The right to a clean environment

* The right to a secure retirement”

July 15 2024 Thoughts and Prayers, Just None of Them Benign

      A dramatic performance before the stage of the world, the wounded hero who refuses to be silenced hurling defiance to his assassin, marked like a hunter riding to hounds on his first kill, a living bloody flag with which to rally the masses; this was Our Clown of Terror’s greatest performance, and one designed to hand him the Presidency.

     An ear nicked by a glass shard or fragment of a bullet, fired by a fellow Republican who has unrestricted access to his sniper position, citizen reports of his doing so ignored by police, Secret Service, and campaign security.

    How likely, how believable, is this scene had we been offered it in a work of fiction?

     My partner Theresa’s immediate reaction was; “This is fake. It’s a show.” Mine was that the Republican Party has decided to free itself from capture by the Fourth Reich and its figurehead Traitor Trump, and that it was funded by Republican power brokers and opportunity created by intelligence provided from within Trump’s inner circle and in collusion with his many layers of public and private security.

     I suspect these two reactions will be typical among our electorate, who by now have internalized the motto of X Files; “Trust No One.”

     This is the nation we live in now, where no one trusts the state or each other, wherein we are divided and our solidarity is a broken and antique thing, and we are no longer co-owners of the state as a democracy, but an audience for performances of democracy which no longer have any meaning.

       We wander lost in a Wilderness of Mirrors, falsifications, lies and illusions, rewritten histories and alternate realities chosen by those who would enslave us. And most of us no longer know the difference, for truth is the first casualty of tyranny.

     President Biden has made kiss the booboo noises with his iron jaws like a Tin Woodsman short of oil, “Politics must never be a literal battlefield or, god forbid, a literal killing field,” he said in his address to the nation. Biden called for “national unity” and proclaimed “We can’t allow this violence to be normalized.” Fine words, with which I would agree in normal times. But normal doesn’t live here anymore.

     Calls to unity and the rule of law are fine when we have a functioning democracy, or one which is salvageable; but Biden’s Restoration of Democracy has failed, and with it the rule of law and our unity as a nation who hold some truths self evident.

     Absolutely democracy is constituted by political violence, and all liberty is created through resistance, seizures of power, and liberation struggle. Here Obama speaks of the internal operations of viable and functioning systems of liberty; but when liberty fails, is sabotaged or subverted, or is yet to be won, democracy must be established by the use of social force and violence beyond the boundaries of its Law. How else can we bring change to systems of oppression?

      Law serves power, order appropriates, and there is no just authority.

      All Resistance is War to the Knife.

      To Traitor Trump, most dangerous enemy spy to have ever tried to bring America down, Russian agent and Nazi fanatic who wants to make of us a white supremacist terrorist state, who conspired in the deaths of policemen and the attempted mass murders of members of Congress in the January 6 Insurrection, rapist who wants to make us a Gideonite theocracy of patriarchal sexual terror, a reality television star who wants to be our king, I send thoughts and prayers; just none of them benign.

     As I wrote of Traitor Trump’s puppetmaster in my post of March 6 2022, How if Vladimir Putin Should Be Assassinated? An Interrogation of the Origins of Evil and the Social Use of Force, and of the State as Embodied Psychopathy and Violence; There is a line in Stephen R. Donaldson’s The Power That Preserves, third novel of The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, spoken of a hero who refuses to be summoned to the rescue because in his other world, our own, a child has been bitten by a snake and must be saved; “Could I damn a world to save the life of one child? I’m not sure I could make that choice.”

    Today we contemplate its opposite; I’m not sure I could make the decision to let the world burn and trigger the extinction of humankind to save the life of one man, Vladimir Putin, whose mad imperial conquest of Ukraine now threatens the future of us all.

    The life of one war criminal versus the incalculable horrors he will bring; I could not choose to save a monster who may destroy us all over saving humankind and our world.

     The violence of the slaver cannot be compared to the violence used by a slave to break his chains., as Trotsky in Their Morals and Ours teaches us.

    A senator with whom I am not usually aligned made an entirely reasonable suggestion recently, for which he has been denounced in the media by friend and foe alike, even AOC for whom I have already declared in the next Presidential election, regardless of whether or not she is on the ballot.

      I am having difficulty understanding why this suggestion was not embraced with great bipartisan enthusiasm, given our history. After all, assassination and overthrowing inconvenient governments is something we do all the time. We even manufacture or capitalize on unforgiveable just causes of war like Russia’s firebombing of a nuclear site this week to launch imperial conquests of our own; the terror attack on the Twin Towers provided a pretext to seize the heroin fields of Afghanistan and the oil fields of Iraq, sacrifices to our shared rituals of public grieving and need for vengeance, and Hearst’s fictions regarding the 1898 sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor gave us the Spanish-American War, Cuba, the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Hawaiian Islands which we stole simply because we could, and later the Presidency of the war’s hero, Teddy Roosevelt.

     Go us? We normally seize such chances with great avarice.

     Perhaps we are growing up, we humans, and abandoning the use of force and violence. The question is whether we can survive to reach the stage of childhood’s end; and this is the inherent dilemma of force and power, for such forces are dichotomous, bidirectional, and have unintended consequences.

     As written by Joan E Greve and Vivian Ho in The Guardian; “Lindsey Graham has attracted widespread condemnation after the South Carolina senator suggested Vladimir Putin should be assassinated in order to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

     Graham first made the suggestion in an appearance on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s show on Thursday evening, and he then repeated the idea in a tweet that quickly went viral.

     “Is there a Brutus in Russia? Is there a more successful Colonel Stauffenberg in the Russian military? The only way this ends is for somebody in Russia to take this guy out,” Graham said on Twitter. “You would be doing your country – and the world – a great service.”

     Brutus refers to one of the assassins of the Roman emperor Julius Caesar, and Stauffenberg was a German army officer who was executed for attempting to kill Adolf Hitler in 1944.

     Graham added in a separate tweet: “The only people who can fix this are the Russian people. Easy to say, hard to do. Unless you want to live in darkness for the rest of your life, be isolated from the rest of the world in abject poverty, and live in darkness you need to step up to the plate.”

     Despite immediate criticism of Graham’s comments from left and right in the US, he doubled down on the idea in a Friday morning interview with Fox & Friends. “I’m hoping somebody in Russia will understand that he is destroying Russia, and you need to take this guy out by any means possible,” Graham said.

    American lawmakers of both parties responded to Graham’s comments with shock, dismay and outrage, pointing out the danger in demanding the assassination of a leader whose troops are currently engaged in shelling nuclear plants.

     “I really wish our members of Congress would cool it and regulate their remarks as the administration works to avoid [a third world war],” the progressive congresswoman Ilhan Omar said in a tweet.

    Republican members of Congress were no less critical, as Senator Ted Cruz derided Graham’s suggestion as “an exceptionally bad idea”. “Use massive economic sanctions; BOYCOTT Russian oil [and] gas; and provide military aid so the Ukrainians can defend themselves,” Cruz said. “But we should not be calling for the assassination of heads of state.”

     Even Marjorie Taylor Greene – the extremist congresswoman who has sparked outrage for, among other things, comparing coronavirus-related restrictions to the treatment of Jewish people during the Holocaust – chimed in from the right with criticism of Graham.

     “While we are all praying for peace [and] for the people of Ukraine, this is irresponsible, dangerous [and] unhinged. We need leaders with calm minds [and] steady wisdom,” Greene said on Twitter. “Not blood thirsty warmongering politicians trying to tweet tough by demanding assassinations. Americans don’t want war.”

    White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, said: “We are not advocating for killing the leader of a foreign country or regime change. That is not the policy of the United States.”

    Really? When has this not been precisely our national policy? President Biden ordered the assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, a man in Syria whom our state claimed without any evidence was the new leader of ISIS, who if the charge was true was a danger only to our common enemies al Qaeda and the Assad regime, mass murdering his entire family merely to divert attention from his many failures, just as Trump had done the year before with his supposed predecessor Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

     Did America not assassinate Salvador Allende and attempt countless times to assassinate Fidel Castro, both heroes as great as any American President?

     Did we not kill in massive and horrific numbers to win our freedom from the British Empire in the Revolutionary War, from slavery in the Civil War, and from fascism in the Second World War?

     We are a nation founded in death and terror through the words with which George Washington sent twelve thousand soldiers to put down the Whisky Rebellion of 1792 and demonstrate the power of the new federal government to enforce taxes; “Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. Government is force; like fire it is a dangerous servant — and a fearful master.”

     Do not speak to me of the moral superiority of America.

     O my brothers, sisters, and others who walk with me through this age of fire, wherein liberty and tyranny hang in the balance and possibly the survival or extinction of humankind, I thank you for the time we have spent together in conversation here, which I cherish as a refuge from the world, as a theatre in which I may process my reactions to the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, and as a forge of action in the performance of my chosen roles as a truthteller, a maker of mischief for tyrants, and in becoming a fulcrum of change.

     Ours is a universe of Chaos, irrational and uncontrollable, and circumstances beyond the scope of our volition may visit disaster and life disruptive events upon us at any moment, for any reasons or none at all, and if by chance this is the last thing I have the opportunity to write, I want you and everyone who has been part of my life to know that you have helped me find balance for the terror of our nothingness in the joy of our freedom and the beauty of the world, healing in the redemptive power of love, and hope for our future possibilities of becoming human in poetic vision and the reimagination and transformation of humankind.

     If by chance you knew our time here in which to do and be the things that bring meaning and value to our lives may number not millennia but hours and days, what would you do and be? Do and be that now, and never stop; for as Kurt Vonnegut teaches us in Mother Night, we become what we pretend to be. What matters here is that our performances of ourselves are chosen and owned by us, and that we own the stories in which we live.

     The most important question to ask of a story is; whose story is this?

     Always there remains the struggle between the masks others make for us and those we make for ourselves. This is the first revolution in which we all must fight; the struggle for ownership of ourselves.

     We are about to pass through a Rashomon Gate event, of fracture, relativization, the bifurcation of timelines and propagation of alternate futures and realities, and all bets are off as to what awaits us on the other side.

     And all of this because a mad tyrant cowers and rages in his warrens of darkness, fragmented and torn apart by the demons which inhabit him as his dreams of empire and dominion fall apart and in accord with Newton’s Third Law create the forces of their own destruction, much as with his predecessor Adolf Hitler at the end, with one crucial difference; beneath his finger lies the button which will launch nuclear annihilation, and it calls to him, whispering; ”Set me free, and I’ll make you powerful.”

     So, as Alfred Doolittle said to Higgins in My Fair Lady, “I put it to you; and I leave it to you”; do we save one life and damn the world?

     As I wrote in my post of February 22 2022, Anniversary of the Martyrdom of Malcolm X; We are shaped by our histories as narratives in which we play our parts; and we also change and seize ownership of our histories and our stories as we perform and enact them.

     This brings us back to issues of unequal power, identity, and the social use of force and violence, issues which the life and works of Malcolm X center and bring into terrible and wonderful focus.

     His principle of action, By Any Means Necessary, is like a riddle challenge uttered by a Zen master, for which there is no single interpretation, and to which no words but only deeds may give answer. It is a principle which helped set us free from history, and which in the end rebounded on him and killed him.

     A dangerous idea, for the use of force obeys Newton’s Third Law and always acts in both directions, action and reaction, unpredictable and slippery in one’s grasp. Yet an idea must be dangerous if it is to be useful in the struggle for liberation.

      The violence used by a slavemaster cannot be compared to the violence used by a slave to break his chains, as Trotsky in Their Morals and Ours has been paraphrased, an extension of Nietzsche’s dichotomy of master versus slave morality. This dictum has its reverse; the state has no legitimate authority to use death, violence, force, or control in the repression of dissent, theft of citizenship or violations of our universal human rights, or authorization of identities. This got Trotsky killed by Stalin, as he rightly called out tyranny and terror as tyranny and terror regardless of what those who would enslave us call themselves.

     Revolutionary struggle, protest movements, and wars of liberation use force and violence to achieve a society free of inequality when there are no other means possible, due to the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle when the tyranny and terror of authority, state force and control, and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege answer dissent with repression because they are without legitimacy and have only fear to keep the slaves at their work. Those who would enslave us refuse to negotiate because they see only themselves as human, and without debate we are left only the sword.

     Any who stand between the tyranny and state terror of conquest, enslavement, and death, and the lives of innocents are heroes and champions of our humanity. The particulars are irrelevant.

      How do such terrible things arise and seize hold of us, shaping us to their uses?

     As I wrote in my post of October 24 2021, Embracing Our Monstrosity: Hierosgamos in Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights; Our monsters, ourselves; genius, madness, inspiration, the quest to become as gods; who among us has not longed to steal the divine fire, to look beyond ourselves, to defy all limits and laws? To be, even for a moment, the unconquered Victor Frankenstein?

     Yet as Prospero said of Caliban, we must also say of Frankenstein’s monster; “This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine.”

     As I have written of Vander Meer’s retelling of Frankenstein in the novel Borne; Mary Shelly’s glorious novel was also about the abandonment of a child who is no longer perfect, among a number of other themes, including the origins of violence.

     A major theme of the novel Frankenstein is the monstrosity of God, who like Victor creates and then abandons his child when it is imperfect and no longer a reflection of his, when we become our own free and independent beings. Yes, Victor wants to become a god, which is why the story resonates with everyone, and is an allegory of the failure of science to realize Idealist visions of humanity, the novel being both a codification and critique of Romantic Idealism.

     But in his quest to become a god, Victor also desires to be worshipped and obeyed; he wants to free himself from subjugation by authority, but not to liberate others. Instead of changing the nature of power, force, and control in casting down from his throne a tyrant god who bound us to his laws and then abandoned us through the abolition of the Law and of the social use of force and the centralization of power and authority to an elite as would a true revolutionary, Victor’s tragic flaw of pride compels him to become the next tyrant and enact the role of his former nemesis.

     It is a cycle of substitutive tyranny which as Vladimir Nabokov pointed out in his novel Lolita, a brilliant critique of the failure of Idealism which led to his father’s execution in the Russian Revolution as an aristocrat, has been recapitulated throughout the world in revolutions which become tyrannies, especially under the imposed conditions of anticolonial struggle.

     There is a line spoken by the villain in the series The Magicians, a survivor of childhood abuse and tyrant known as The Beast for his horrific crimes, once the powerless and terrified Martin Chatwin and now like Saturn a monstrous cannibal god; “You know, when I was a boy, a man who was meant to care for me bent me over his desk and had me over and over every time I was alone with him. It helps me understand a truth. You’re powerful or you’re weak. “

      Here is the original lie of the tyrant and the fascist in the apologetics and self-justification of power; the lie that only power has meaning, that there is no good or evil. How we use power is of equal importance as who holds it. Fear and force are a primary means of human exchange, but not the only means; love, membership, and belonging are as important. The great question which democracy attempts to answer is how to balance the rights and needs of individuals so that none may infringe upon another’s.  

      It’s a line which captures perfectly the inherent contradictions of the  Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force as an origin of evil; for the use of social force is subversive of its own values. Yet the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle often require violence, and until the gods of law and order have been cast down from their thrones I must agree with the famous dictum of Sartre in his 1948 play Dirty Hands, quoted by Frantz Fanon in his 1960 speech Why We Use Violence, and made immortal by Malcolm X; “by any means necessary.”

     As written by Walter Rodney in The Groundings with my Brothers; “We were told that violence in itself is evil, and that, whatever the cause, it is unjustified morally. By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master? By what standards can we equate the violence of blacks who have been oppressed, suppressed, depressed and repressed for four centuries with the violence of white fascists? Violence aimed at the recovery of human dignity and at equality cannot be judged by the same yardstick as violence aimed at maintenance of discrimination and oppression.”

     And here is the passage he references from Leon Trotsky in Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice; “A slave-owner who through cunning and violence shackles a slave in chains, and a slave who through cunning or violence breaks the chains – let not the contemptible eunuchs tell us that they are equals before a court of morality!”

    I have no use for anything that limits our power to resist evil; the boundaries of the Forbidden, the tyranny of normality and other people’s ideas of virtue, or the limits of our humanity.

     Yet in reflection I think of those great figures who have been both heroes of liberation and villains of tyranny; Napoleon, Washington, Stalin, Mao, the list is a near endless litany of woes and failures of vision wherein Brave New Worlds became hells and carceral states. In evidence I offer the French and American Revolutions and their imperial successor states, those of the Soviet Union and the Chinese Communist Party, and above all the state of Israel, a dream of refuge forged in the terror of the Holocaust whose victims learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis and assumed their role in the Occupation of Palestine. The dangers of Idealism as taught to us by Vladimir Nabokov in Lolita and by his model Thomas Mann in Death in Venice are very real; but so are the dangers of submission to authority and the complicity of silence in the face of evil. 

     How does a revolution seize power without becoming a tyranny? How shall we gather the force and will to resist unjust authority, without enforcing our own notions of the good on others in our turn?

     This is the dilemma of power; that we must wield force to take it from our oppressors, and that we must relinquish it when it is ours and refuse to shape our fellows to our will.

     We must refuse to submit to authority if we are to seize our liberty; and we must refuse to subjugate others that they may do the same if we are to avoid becoming the monsters we hunt.

     I like and empathize with the character of Victor in Mary Shelly’s allegory of the origins of evil, and have used variants of this name as aliases because he is a figure of Milton’s rebel angel, but also I admire the monster in all his magnificence, a figure of the Shadow based on Caliban in The Tempest. The story is about their relationship as parent and abandoned and damaged child, about the interplay of these selves in the growth of the psyche and processes of becoming human, and about the political consequences of otherness and monstrosity.

     If we cannot embrace our monstrosity and our shadows, how can we bring change to systems of oppression?

      Frankenstein addresses themes of science versus nature, reason versus passion, and both of these within a Promethean rebellion against God, authority, and universal Law as a form of Idealism; this from the perspective of the monster’s creator.

     From the monster’s view, the novel portrays the disfigurement of the soul through abandonment by a parent who also functions as a figure of a creator-god and of Authority, known as the problem of the Deus Absconditus which refers to the god who bound us to his despicable Laws and then ran away before he was caught, and who drives the child to achievement and supremacy as his proxy of dominion and vindication before the world rather than empowering the child’s own agency to discover and follow a unique bliss and personhood- what the Greeks called Arete or Virtue but also denoting superiority as with the apex predator and ideal of patriarchal masculinity Achilles in the Iliad, one of  Mary Shelly’s sources- in a chosen arena but who like Alberich in Wagner’s Ring must renounce love to win supremacy and power, rendering all victory meaningless and hollow, dehumanizing the child and shaping a vessel of rage and vengeance, a tyrant forged in the violence of the struggle to free himself from enslavement, with the iron self discipline and will to enact subjugation of others in their turn, terrible and pathetic and with the grandeur of a tortured defiant beast trapped in the same flesh as the innocent who needs to be loved and cannot understand why he seems monstrous to others. It is about birthing monsters, and the chaotic plasticity of identity and relationships.

     As written by Octave Mirbeau in The Torture Garden; “Monsters, monsters! But there are no monsters! What you call monsters are superior forms, or forms beyond your understanding. Aren’t the gods monsters? Isn’t a man of genius a monster, like a tiger or a spider, like all individuals who live beyond social lies, in the dazzling and divine immortality of things? Why, I too then-am a monster!”

     A story which is at once Greek tragedy and Freudian study of the processes and relations between the id, ego, and superego, with a third parallel storyline relating a Romantic reimagination of Biblical Genesis like that of Blake, it is both the apotheosis of Romantic Idealism and its first criticism, exegesis and classical myth, dialectic on responsibility and discourse on Aristotle’s categories of being, critique of Rousseau’s natural man and of Nietzsche’s Superman which it also inspired in a recursive loop of influence across the seas of time. Its author was a Pythian visionary whose insight reached centuries into the future, and whose immense scholarship reimagined some of the greatest works of our historical civilization.

     Mary Shelly’s influence echoes through time, multiplies, and reshapes the contexts of its polymorphous meanings. One cannot think of Kafka’s Gregor Samsa without thinking of his original, the dual-aspected monster-child created to bind our nature with reason, nor read her sources and references in the prophecies of William Blake and Milton’s Paradise Lost without reevaluating them in terms of Mary Shelly’s novel; her work resonates through past and future, and what touches, it changes.

      Who can read the work of Emily Bronte without the meaning of her great novel Wuthering Heights changing with our awareness that its author thought of herself as Victor Frankenstein and as the titan Prometheus cast out of heaven like Milton’s rebel angel? That Heathcliff is her monster, a demon to be united with in an exalted Nietzschean rapture of transformative rebirth? And does this not change one’s reading of her source Frankenstein?

     A nested set of puzzle box themes and contexts, multiple narrative threads which create paradoxes of meaning, role reversals and inversions of identities, and the questioning of the mission of civilization and the morality of progress; Mary Shelly created the modern world with her great book Frankenstein.

     It is a modernity which can unfold limitless possibilities of becoming human, or like Pandora’s Box and the Lament Configuration of the toymaker LeMarchand in Clive Barker’s Hellraiser mythos unleash horrors beyond our imagination, as Putin now threatens to do with nuclear war and annihilation.

    With Putin like Dr Strangelove hypnotized by the siren call of his missiles and their promise of ultimate power, the power of total destruction and the end of humankind, chanting Oppenheimer’s ritual invocation; “Behold! I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds!”, the question before us all changes.

     Nuclear annihilation whispers from the darkness, unleash me, and I’ll make you powerful. But this is a lie, for such power will also consume us and steal our souls.

     The great question to which we must now find answer is no longer when is it good to be bad, but how much of our humanity we are willing to sacrifice for our survival as a species.

      As I wrote in my post of February 5 2020, Democracy Falls in America: the Acquittal of Traitor Trump; At the end I am driven finally to reconsider the position of the great, flawed idol of my youth Malcolm X; by any means necessary.

      By any means necessary; this is a horrible, terrible principle of action, one fraught with endless possibilities of inhumanity and malign power, yet if we are forced to a resistance of survival as was Camus, who wrote for those who must claw their way out of the ruins of lost positions and face yet another Last Stand, beyond hope of victory or even survival, how else may we combat our dehumanization?

     We must never surrender hope, for our resistance can triumph over anything but the loss of our faith in ourselves and one another. So long as one of us remembers the dream of freedom, we may yet redeem our humanity.

      My answer to the Republican subversion of democracy remains NO!

     Yet beyond this, we must fight not merely against fascism but also for democracy and the universal rights of man. As we resist fascism to defend equality and freedom as our common human rights, so we must use force and violence against social and institutional systems, structures, and ideologies and not persons, for we may seek truth together nonviolently with those with whom we disagree as the signal virtue of democracy and humanism, even with our enemies as brother warriors.

     Resisting evil means resisting that of others against our universal humanity, but it also means resisting the seduction of evil and power and of our own use of force to compel others.

     Power is the evil impulse which births monsters.

     So often in history those who commit true atrocities are utterly convinced of the justice of their cause, Gott Mitt Uns, are informed and motivated by narratives of victimhood and have abandoned the self-questioning which is the fulcrum of a free society of equals. This, too, we must resist.

     For this is why revolutions, once power has been seized and tyranny overthrown, may become themselves tyrannies, and why I prefer to let others run amok and be ungovernable to the specter of authoritarian social control.

     Let us send no armies to enforce virtue.

     And remember always Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

     Further illumination may be found in Anthony Burgess’ masterpiece Napoleon Symphony, a tragedy of Napoleon and Beethoven’s Eroica and a novel whose discovery was a defining moment of my fourteenth year and has remained with me ever since, despite my teenage adoration of Napoleon as a hero of revolution and liberation, a universal genius and ideal of human being.

      Here is the ground of struggle between tyranny and resistance under imposed conditions of systemic unequal power in the use of social force and violence, and between seizures of power as ownership of identity versus the falsification of authorized identities in the struggle between the stories we tell about ourselves and those told about us by others; history, memory, identity.

     Read it as I did beneath a print of Klimt’s Beethoven Frieze, depicting a Shadow pantheon with the wonderful image of the rebel Titan Typhoeus as a chthonic ape and his three gorgon daughters to his left under signifying masks of Death, Madness, and Desire (I found Disease redundant and renamed her Desire as a better balance of forces, plus she is depicted as a three aspected goddess to the right as Lasciviousness, Wantonness, and Intemperance); really, what more could a boy ask for?

     And here is the dynamism of our relationship with our shadow self and all that we fear and experience as disgust and revulsion, fear of nature and of our instinctive selves externalized and projected as fear of otherness, loss of self and of control, and degradation to an animal state which drive identity politics and social constructions of race, gender, and class or caste which includes nationalism and sectarian faith, especially when overwhelming and pervasive fear and real existential threats are weaponized by authority in service to power, as Malcolm X was falsified by Elijah Muhammed’s Black Muslim separatist nationalism as his herald, in reaction against the greater historical and systemic evils and multigenerational trauma and inequality of white supremacist terror and the legacies of slavery.

    Processes of transformational change and social adaptation are chaotic and interdependent, and their causes are circular or more complex as we can see in the case of Malcolm X and liberation struggle, and in all such histories. This is one lesson we can learn from Malcolm X; there is no just authority. And those who claim to speak for you often do so as a primary strategy of fascisms of blood, faith, and soil and in your subjugation to tyranny.

    A second such lesson is that racism in general, and all divisions and social hierarchies of elite membership and exclusionary otherness, compel submission to authority through the weaponization of fear as an arbiter of our most important relationship, that of the conscious and unconscious or shadow self, which can be read in how we feel and think about nature and those truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh.

     We define ourselves through figures of otherness who represent unintegrated parts of ourselves and define the limits of the human; freaks, monsters, and all those beyond the boundaries of the Forbidden and that which we claim as ours.

     For this fear of nature as the origin of racism I have a simple solution; let us embrace our monstrosity, and perform violations of normality and transgressions of the Forbidden as sacred acts of Chaos in pursuit of truth.

    The third gift of Malcolm X to our limitless future possibilities of becoming human is a life lived in revolutionary struggle and resistance against systems, structures, and institutions of unequal power as direct interrogation and engagement with the state as embodied violence, and with the consequences of the use of social force.

     He died for our chance to learn these three things, how authority falsifies and subjugates us as a primary historical process, how racism and other inequalities of power are born of fear of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves, and the dichotomous and bidirectional nature of violence and the dialectical processes of the use of social force in tyranny and terror and in resistance and revolution, and as a martyr and teacher of wisdom Malcolm X is a figure of liberation who belongs to all humankind.

      How can we disambiguate the violence of the “slave-owner who through cunning and violence shackles a slave in chains, and a slave who through cunning or violence breaks the chains” as Trotsky phrased it, of tyranny and carceral states from revolutionary struggle and liberation, of action in accord with our duty of care for others and our interdependence and solidarity from the enforcement of virtue and imperialism?

     As I wrote in my post of February 4 2022, A Stain of Cruelty: the Assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi ; To paraphrase the line from Hamlet and Star Trek in season one, episode 13, The Conscience of the King; There’s a stain of cruelty on your armor, President Biden.

    We have answered terror and death with terror and death, and this is both tragic and shameful. Force cannot answer force, nor heal the flaws of our humanity.

     As written for CNN by Barbara Starr, Oren Liebermann, Jeremy Herb and Eyad Kourdi; “It was the biggest US raid in the country since the 2019 operation that killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

     Biden spoke from the White House Thursday morning to announce that the operation had taken “a major terrorist leader off the battlefield.”

     “Thanks to the bravery of our troops, this horrible terrorist leader is no more,” Biden said from the Roosevelt Room. “Knowing that terrorist had chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a Special Forces raid at a much a greater risk to our own people rather than targeting him with an airstrike.”

    Now and then Biden reminds us all that he was among the principal collaborators in Bush’s invasion of Iraq as imperial conquest and colonial plunder to seize the strategic resource of oil by which America maintains a global hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege, an addiction which will result in the extinction of humankind as a species, and in the authorization through the Patriot Act of a carceral state of brutal force and pervasive surveillance and thought control exceeded only by Xin Jinping’s holocaust of the Uighurs of Xinjiang, which has enabled the most massive theft of our freedoms in our history, including the McCarthy era, and the most bizarre and reprehensible regime of torture, most infamous in the crimes against humanity perpetrated at Guantanamo and other secret prisons for political enemies of the regime and its oligarchic, plutocratic, and corporate robber baron paymasters, including even the grisly hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials.

    Once again our heroes and champions are proven to have feet of clay, and I mourn the failure of moral vision and addiction to power and the use of force and violence of President Biden, our government, and America as a guarantor of universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

    On this day and all too often, the Promethean Fire of the Torch of Liberty which illuminates the gates of our nation in New York Harbor did not reach across the wild seas to foreign shores. This is a great tragedy, and it is a tragedy which is ours and for which we must answer.

     The deaths of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi and his family as a consequence of America’s raid on his home, not an arrest for crimes provable in a court of law but political assassinations, are rightly being compared in the media to the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi by Trump. This situates Biden and Trump on an equal level of criminal amorality and state terror.

    Before the stage of the world and history, it also generates moral equivalence between ISIS and America, as our enemies intend by their provocations as a strategy of delegitimation of a regime. I use this myself as a democracy activist, for the art of revolution is about claiming the moral high ground and the delegitimation of authority and seizing control of the narrative.

    Sending armies and police to enforce virtue through violence and repression is not only evil, it is also stupid; for it plays into the hands of the enemy. As Shakespeare teaches us in Henry V; “When lenity and cruelty play for kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.”

    There are still notable differences between Biden and Trump, and between the goals, values, and ideals of Democrats and Republicans, madness and treason among them. But today those differences became suddenly and horrifically more narrow, and I fear we will need more than the eye of a needle as a window to a better future.

    As written in my post of October 28 2019, Trump and al-Baghdadi: Parallel Lives and Reflections; The personal and historical forces which create tyrants and monsters among us have been a lifelong study of mine, aspects of a curiosity regarding the origins and nature of evil born of primary childhood traumas in the Bloody Thursday massacre ordered by Ronald Reagan against a student peace protest in Berkeley 1969 when I was nine and my near execution in Brazil at the age of fourteen defending street children from police bounty hunters, which echoes those of Maurice Blanchot in June 1944 by the Nazis and Dostoevsky’s in 1849 by Czarist police, informed by Jerzy Kosinski’s novel The Painted Bird and focused by the classic study of Adolf Hitler from his speeches and writings, The Psychopathic God by Robert G. L. Waite, both of which I read during high school. Thus I became fascinated by the intersections of literature, philosophy, history, and psychology, and chose the origins of evil as my lifelong field of study.

    As the world celebrates the death of al-Baghdadi, both tyrant and monster, and Trump claims credit in this the sole victory of his administration, as if for the trophy head of some dangerous beast shot by a guide while enjoying cocktails at the hunting camp, it may be interesting to compare the parallel lives, methods, and goals of Trump and al-Baghdadi.

      A full psychological and historical study of Trump and al-Baghdadi as figures of fascist terror and madness on a global political scale in the context of civilizational conflicts would require a book of Biblical proportions and thesis-level scholarship such as Waite’s brilliant work on Hitler. Here I note only some of the obvious alignments and congruences; both Trump and al-Baghdadi are megalomaniacs and psychopaths who seized power through manipulation of those who perceived themselves as victims and readily dehumanized others to change their status, using disruption of norms and a reimagination of reality through lies and misdirects to shape history, and enacted regimes of state terror and campaigns of religious and ethnic cleansing and of patriarchal misogyny and sexual violence against women.

     Of Trump we have a cornucopia of information; Dr Justin Frank’s book Trump on the Couch and The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President by Bandy X. Lee are excellent resources, particularly illuminating on Trump’s erotic relationship with his daughter, the fantasies of violence and power which are rooted in his childhood relationship with his tyrannical and abusive father, and his inability to love or empathize with others as a result of his abandonment by his mother.

      Pathological lies, poor impulse control, and grandiose fantasies and delusions complete the picture of a narcissistic personality and psychopathic predator. Trump cannot distinguish truth from lies and delusions; his madness and childlike feeble mindedness, the tantrums and psychotic rages, the bullying and narcissism of a spoiled brat, does not however absolve him of responsibility for his actions, or those of the treasonous cabal of sex predators and fascists he has gathered around him.

     How Trump’s particular madness is expressed in our national policy is a horror which can described with precision; his fear of contamination and faecal fixation translate into his signature campaign against nonwhite others and a policy of ethnic cleansing and racist state terror, his misogyny into a patriarchal wave of legal disempowerment of women’s reproductive rights, his fragile ego,  identity confusion, and need for attention into a governance of Nuremberg-like rallies, the cultivation of despicable autocrats, and the obsessive vengeance against anyone who refuses to offer adoration and submission.

     Above all what unites Trump and his puppetmaster Putin, his model Hitler, and his mirror image al-Baghdadi, as monsters and tyrants who reflect one another and as parallel figures and historical forces is the theory of politics as theatre of cruelty, the state as embodied psychopathy and violence, and government as performance art.  

     For their performances of leadership as clowns of terror and madness provide mirror opposite images of the reign of the Roman Emperor described with wit and guile by Antonin Artaud in his great novel Heliogabalus; or, the Crowned Anarchist, a figure who disrupted norms as an agent of change and chaos to transform an inert and ossified society, whereas Trump and al-Baghdadi have acted as partners in reaction to disrupt civilization itself and return us to a pre-democratic barbarian tyranny.

     Trump claims to have killed his dark reflection and shadow self by his spurious arrogation of a victory won by our intelligence and military services; but history will always see this second face behind his mask, a secret twin he bears into eternity, a face of power and twisted desires unrestrained by the laws and values of a democratic civilization and a free society of equals: the face of Trump’s heart of darkness, al-Baghdadi.

    So I wrote on October 28 2019; and so I must write now of Biden’s secret face and heart of darkness, Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, linked now for eternity as figures of terror, murderous retribution, and cruelty.

    State terror and imperialism has met sectarian and patriarchal terror as tyranny and organizations of institutionalized violence and power; we can only hope now that they will recognize their twin image in the mirror of death which war and acts of force and violence confront us with, and walk away from the precipice which threatens to consume us all.

    As Ken Kesey said in his historic speech to a peace protest against the war in Vietnam recorded in Tom Wolfe’s novel The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test; “The way to end war is just walk away and say fuck it. Just walk away and say fuck it.”

     Every word of this remains true, in these and all cases of tyranny and the institutional terror of carceral states of force and control, of authorized identities and falsification by propaganda and rewritten histories, of imperial conquest and dominion and colonial exploitation and enslavement. It is also true now of Russia in the invasion of Ukraine.

    As I wrote here of Trump we may also say of his master Putin; for Traitor Trump is but a negative space and shadow cast by his original type, and both are atavisms of fear and force, chasms of emptiness which nothing can fill, no amount of dominion and control of others, displays of wealth and power  or vainglorious strutting, to which no sacrifices of things loved by others or the terror and pain of their victims can suffice, for such is the nature of psychopathy and of politics as a theatre of cruelty.

     What does this mean?

     For us in this moment and in the context of the question of violence and the social use of force, it means that in the unequal balance of power between Russia and Ukraine, wherein real people are dying because someone has the power to steal what they have, a predator for whom nothing is real or has meaning but force and power, we must find answer to the declaration of Ayn Rand’s monstrous protagonist Howard Roark in The Fountainhead as he commits rape; “The question isn’t who is going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me.”

     Who will stop Putin’s conquest of Ukraine?

    If they come for one of us, let them be met with all of us; not divided by hierarchies of elite belonging and exclusionary otherness, nor defeated by learned helplessness and terror, but united in solidarity and refusal to submit as one unconquerable and united humankind.

     I am a hunter of fascists, and mine is a hunter’s morality. There is a simple test for the use of force; who holds power?

    For me, this is simple; the nation invading another is in the wrong. This is no different from chancing to discover a policeman kneeling on someone’s neck, in which case our duty of care for others requires us to save the life of the person who is being murdered right in front of us, regardless of any irrelevant details like which of them has the badge and the gun, the authority and the power, by any means necessary.

    Law serves power, and there is no just authority.

    Even if neither nation is a democracy, and victims of unequal power have no inherent moral burden of virtue as Shaw teaches us with the figure of Arthur Doolittle in My Fair Lady, one of them stealing the lives and freedom of the other as the right of sovereignty, self-determination, autonomy, and independence cannot be just, and must be opposed.

      By any means necessary.

      While the political origins of conflict are often ambiguous, its consequences for the people in the path of a conquest are not. As my long term goals remain a united humankind and a stateless society which has abandoned the social use of force and control and with it all laws, authorized identities, and the tyranny of other peoples ideas of virtue, and the emergence of a free society of equals from divisions of exclusionary otherness, elite hegemonies of wealth,  power, and privilege, and from fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, I stand with Ukraine and with any liberation movement of sovereignty and independence anywhere, and with the people of Russia against the oligarchy and Putin and for all democracy movements against tyranny.

     Let us stand in solidarity as a band of brothers, wherever men hunger to be free.

     Our duty of care for others sometimes requires us to place our lives in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon called the Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased. I am only one man, and not extraordinary, with nothing but my witness of history and my vision of our future possibilities of becoming human to hurl against the chasms of darkness and the terror of our nothingness in the face of overwhelming force and amoral imperial and carceral states.

     But I cannot be complicit in silence with these crimes against humanity, to which as with fascism there can be but one reply: Never Again! A rallying cry complicated by its popularization in the title of founder of the Jewish Defense League Meir Kahane’s book “Never Again!: A Program for Survival, its origin is in Isaac Lambdan’s 1926 poem Masada; “Never shall Masada fall again”; it first appeared  in its current form on signs written by the prisoners of Buchenwald after its liberation.

     Elie Wiesel defines the phrase in his novel Hostage; “Never again” becomes more than a slogan: It’s a prayer, a promise, a vow. There will never again be hatred, people say. Never again jail and torture. Never again the suffering of innocent people, or the shooting of starving, frightened, terrified children. And never again the glorification of base, ugly, dark violence. It’s a prayer.”

     Here I would declare Sic Semper Tyrannis, but this is a phrase from the shadows and legacies of our history from which we must emerge, and includes the assassinations of Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln, whose killers I despise and would not align myself with.

      I do not trust certainties or those who act in their name, Gott Mitt Uns bearing a history of atrocities and terror which has no equals, and includes the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Thirty Year’s War, and the Holocaust. As Voltaire wrote in his 1765 essay Questions sur les miracles; “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

   Instead I will say with the magnificent Lt. Aldo Raine in Inglorious Basterds, and I hope in a way which preserves and reflects the moral ambiguity, contingency, and relativity of the original in the film; “Now that I can’t abide. How ’bout you, can you abide it?”

               Refences on the Failed Assassination of Trump

Biden urges US to reject ‘extremism and fury’ after Trump assassination attempt: In Oval Office TV address, president forcefully condemns political violence and says country must strive for unity

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/14/biden-trump-rally-shooting-oval-office

The Trump shooting is a reminder: we live in a grim new era of political violence

Moira Donegan

The Guardian view on Trump’s shooting: America’s future must be set by voters, not the gun/ Editorial

Monday briefing: Will the attempt on Donald Trump’s life be a watershed moment – or a new source of division?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/15/monday-briefing-donald-trump-shooting

Did Donald Trump just win the election? Arwa Mahdawi

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/15/did-donald-trump-just-win-the-election

‘Is this what a second Trump presidency will be like?’ – our art critic on the chilling shooting image

Interview

‘Rule of the lawless’: what does the authoritarian playbook look like?

Alice Herman

What is Project 2025 and what is Trump’s involvement?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/26/what-is-project-2025-trump

     Here are the references from my essay; first among them my theme song for Last Stands, which I posted on August 24 2021 as I joined the defense of Afghanistan after its fall at Panjshir, and as I prepared to join the defense of Ukraine in Mariupol with the Abraham Lincoln Brigade on March 22 2022.

     My hope for us all now is that we may never need to make such Last Stands here in America against a state captured by the Fourth Reich.

     Vote this November, friends; I have seen both, and voting is always better than shooting. 

Inglourious Basterds: Shoshanna Prepares for German Night

The Undeserving: Alfred P. Doolittle’s Speech in My Fair Lady

The Conscience of the King: Star Trek Season 1, episode 13

By Any Means Necessary speech by Malcolm X

Mother Night by Kurt Vonnegut film

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117093/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk

Kenneth Branagh’s Henry V: St. Crispin’s Day Speech

The Magicians: Fear, Power, Force, and the Origins of Evil

Dr. Strangelove trailer

Oppenheimer Quotes the Bhagavad Gita 11.32.; I am become Death

Translations of the passage

Klimt’s Beethoven Frieze, detail of Typhoeus and his daughters

Rashomon Effects: Kurosawa, Rashomon and Their Legacies

by Blair Davis (Editor), Robert Anderson (Editor), Jan Walls (Editor)

Napoleon Symphony: A Novel in Four Movements, by Anthony Burgess

Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice

by Leon Trotsky, John Dewey, George Novack, David Salner

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/184450.Their_Morals_and_Ours

The Groundings with My Brothers, by Walter Rodney

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1205543.The_Groundings_with_My_Brothers

Never Again! A Program for Survival, by Meir Kahane

Hostage, by Elie Wiesel

The Wretched of the Earth, by Frantz Fanon, Jean-Paul Sartre (Preface),

Dirty Hands, by Jean-Paul Sartre

The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, by Tom Wolfe

Heliogabalus; or, the Crowned Anarchist, by Antonin Artaud

The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President, by Bandy X. Lee

Trump on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President, by Justin A. Frank

The Psychopathic God, by Robert G.L. Waite

The Painted Bird, by Jerzy Kosiński

The Torture Garden, by Octave Mirbeau

The Idiot, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anna Brailovsky (Translator)

The Instant of My Death / Demeure: Fiction and Testimony, by Maurice Blanchot, Jacques Derrida

Henry V, Folger Shakespeare Library, by William Shakespeare, Barbara A. Mowat (Editor), Paul Werstine (Editor), Michael Neill (Essay)

Beyond Good and Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche

The New Annotated Frankenstein, by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, Leslie S. Klinger (Goodreads Author) (Editor), Guillermo del Toro (Introduction), Anne K. Mellor (Afterword)

Borne, by Jeff VanderMeer

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/31451186-borne

Wuthering Heights, by Emily Brontë, Richard J. Dunn (Editor), Charlotte Brontë (Commentary), Robert Heindel (Illustrator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6185.Wuthering_Heights

Death in Venice, by Thomas Mann, Michael Cunningham (Goodreads Author) (Introduction), Michael Henry Heim (Translator)

Lolita, by Vladimir Nabokov

Ring of Power: Symbols and Themes Love Vs. Power in Wagner’s Ring Circle and in Us : A Jungian-Feminist Perspective, by Jean Shinoda Bolen

Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained, by John Milton, Christopher Ricks (Annotations)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/336518.Paradise_Lost_and_Paradise_Regained

The Tempest, Folger Shakespeare Library, by William Shakespeare, Paul Werstine (Editor), David Lindley (Editor), Israel Gollancz (Preface & Glossary), Barbara A. Mowat (Editor)

The Power That Preserves (The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever #3), by Stephen R. Donaldson

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/04/lindsey-graham-suggests-putin-assassination-russia-ukraine?fbclid=IwAR3lDpoQX0wxnz28B30Vq50rBpl9qa2wRbJECd5Iu8rhet6V5FeoY7mDus0

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/04/nato-chief-warns-of-worse-suffering-in-ukraine-and-russian-attacks-elsewher

e

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ukraine-evacuation-halted-cease-fire_n_62234cf7e4b012a2628b24d8

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/04/russia-appears-to-have-no-way-out-as-putin-goes-all-in-ukraine

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/04/russia-ukraine-how-the-west-woke-up-to-vladimir-putin

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/04/putin-wants-to-kill-us-totally-ukrainians-hold-firm-under-bombardment

   How does one read such a manifesto?

    Herein I write a manifesto of action as Socratic dialog and Swiftian satire, which as stated in the title questions “the Origins of Evil and the Social Use of Force, and of the State as Embodied Psychopathy and Violence”.

    As the motto of my publication Torch of Liberty declares, my intent is “to incite, provoke, and disturb.” 

    Consider also that I claim the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen as Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority, and that I do these things in performance as what Foucault called a truth teller, in the pursuit of truth as a sacred calling.

    In this essay I interrogate a set of interdependent problems which I believe are central to the project of becoming human we all share, and the consequences of the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force posed to us by the situation we face in this moment, and here I use the term moment in the ways that Jacques Derrida and Alain Badiou did, wherein a monstrous tyrant threatens nuclear war and the extermination of all humankind on a whim of infantile tantrum, and we must choose one or the other.

     It is a dilemma which like all use of social force makes us complicit in evil, a primary strategy of fascism in our subjugation, and which reproduces the conditions from which states arise as embodied psychopathy and violence, elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.

    Badiou claims events are fundamentally indeterminate and structured by the dialectics of possibility and impossibility, maybe-maybe not as my mother used to say to students who asked her for positional declarations, judgements, authorized versions, singing the words and bouncing her hands from side to side.

     For Derrida, as my friend Rene Troy Tun has described, “the event in its absolute singularity is thus resistant to cognitive description, critical objectification, interpretive reduction, and theoretical elaboration.”

    Here with this primary existential question of human being, meaning, and value I struggle to find synthesis; like the performance of our identities, this process need not be determinative or prescriptive, but a space of free creative play.

     If we have no answers, we must learn to ask better questions.

     In this tilting at windmills I use Milorad Pavić’s Dictionary of the Khazars as my model, a magisterial work which comes in male and female versions and whose meaning changes with a difference of seventeen lines between them.

    How if Vladimir Putin Should Be Assassinated? Do we save one life, that of a mad tyrant who will destroy us, and damn the world? 

    Such is my witness and confession.

 Dictionary of the Khazars, by Milorad Pavić

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/321566.Dictionary_of_the_Khazars

Works of Jacques Derrida

Works of Alain Badiou

July 14 2024 A Legacy of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity for All Humankind: Bastille Day

     We celebrate today a legacy of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity for all humankind, bequeathed to us by the Revolution on this day in 1789 with the storming of the Bastille.

      I find it immensely hopeful for the future of humankind that France, a nation where protest historically is seen as a patriotic act with the bizarre exceptions of de Gaulle’s repression of the May 1968 protests and of Macron’s repression of last year’s wave originating in Marseille as a parallel of America’s Black Lives Matter protests of the Summer of Fire 2020, symptoms of systemic racism and unequal power which echoes the era of colonial Algeria and of the incipient collapse of our democracy and global civilization, celebrates as its founding event the seizure of a prison, and one which in part was intended as the jailbreak for the poet laureate of the Revolution, the Marquis de Sade. He had been yelling to the crowd from his cell window that the jailers were executing prisoners; he was unfortunately spirited away to the madhouse at Charenton before he could be liberated, an episode immortalized by Peter Weiss in Marat/Sade. Freed by the Revolution, de Sade became a leader of the radical wing of the Jacobins, until his beautiful elegy for Marat ran afoul of Robespierre’s designs and landed him yet again in prison.

     When I describe and think of myself as a Jacobin in terms of political identity, I am thinking of the relationship between Marat and de Sade as negative spaces of each other and of systemic unequal power as the origin of evil and the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force which subverts revolutionary seizures of power as tyranny.

     During his time in the Bastille he wrote one of the most brilliant and transgressive interrogations of the origins of evil in unequal power and  the Church and State as embodied violence, 120 Days of Sodom. Every word of it is still true, and applies to all tyrannies of force and control, totalitarian and authoritarian states of all kinds and to my thinking fascism especially, as interpreted by the great Pasolini in film, as symptoms of the disease of fear, power, and force. Read it together with its companion work, The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt.

     As Pasolini says in his interview during the filming of ‘Salò or the 120 Days of Sodom’;

“PASOLINI: I simply plan to replace the word “God,” as de Sade uses it, with the word “power.” The sadists are always the powerful ones. These four gentlemen in the story are a banker, a duke, a bishop, and a judge. They represent the constituted might. The analogy is obvious, and I didn’t invent it. I am only adding something of my own and am complicating it by bringing it up to date.

BACHMANN: What is the remaining, continuing significance of de Sade s work?

PASOLINI: The fact that the body becomes merchandise. My film is planned as a sexual metaphor, which symbolizes, in a visionary way, the relationship between exploiter and exploited. In sadism and in power politics human beings become objects. That similarity is the ideological basis of the film.”

     For further study of de Sade as a pivotal figure of the Revolution, I refer you to Angela Carter’s The Sadeian Woman and the Ideology of Pornography, a feminist interpretation which informs all her work, The Fan-Maker’s Inquisition: A Novel of the Marquis de Sade by Rikki Ducornet, and The Marquis de Sade: A Life, by Neil Schaeffer.

      My reading list on the French Revolution includes Citizens by Simon Schama, The Days of the French Revolution by Christopher Hibbert, and A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel.

      As causal sources of global revolution against the system of aristocratic monarchy and state religion, the American and French Revolutions are a tide of democracy and universal human rights which radically reimagined human social and political relations, being, meaning, and value, and continue to propagate throughout the world. It found echoes in the Russian Revolution, and as anticolonial struggle in India, South Africa, and nearly everywhere on earth as humankind awakened from its long darkness as tyrannies of masters and slaves.

      Today its values and ideals manifest in revolutions and liberation movements throughout the world, in Hong Kong, Palestine, and Ukraine, among those places to which I have traveled in solidarity with the struggles of their peoples, those whom Franz Fanon called “The Wretched of the Earth”, and whom our Statue of Liberty proclaims the “huddled masses yearning to be free”.    

      What does Liberty mean for us today?

      Memory, history, and identity; a process of becoming human and a ground of struggle between our anchorages and our aspirations, and one in constant motion and a state of change; impermanent, ephemeral, protean, shaped by the dynamism between authenticity and falsification as we wander in a wilderness of mirrors, lies and illusions of authority which seek to capture, distort, and subjugate us, to enslave us and steal our souls.

     This is the primary revolution of all humankind; the struggle to create ourselves as autonomous beings, free of authorized identities and the tyranny of other people’s ideas of virtue, against the forces of dehumanization and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, divisions of exclusionary otherness and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, and the inequalities and injustices of state terror, repression of dissent, institutional violence, force, and control.

     To become ourselves is the first revolution in which we all must fight, of which other forms of revolutionary struggle are echoes and reflections, and they are united in the struggle for ownership and control of our identity as aspects of a common emergence of human being, meaning, and value.

     To refuse to submit is the primary human act which confers freedom, for who cannot be controlled is free. In this moment of Resistance to authority and tyranny we become Unconquered, each if us Living Autonomous Zones and agents of Chaos, Liberty, and the reimagination and transformation of humankind.

     Let us throw open the gates of our prisons, and be free.

     On Bastille Day last year protestors booed their President during his parade,  set fire to his favorite restaurant, and skirmished with police in Paris, not yet a true revolution as he was not in it at the time; this is the identical tipping point faced by Louis XVI on 5 October 1789 when the people besieged Versailles and demanded he return to Paris. All is not yet lost; the Republic can still be saved.

     For now the tides of history have changed, and in the election a few days ago which was a referendum on Le Pen’s Nazi revivalists as well as the Macron Presidency, the Left has emerged victorious and France has renounced utterly both fascism and tyranny.

     As Guillermo del Toro teaches us in Carnival Row; “Chaos is the great hope of the powerless”. Let us seize our moment and bring change to systems of oppression and unequal power.

     In this moment of decision, I say to you Macron and to all who meet protest not with redress of grievances but with brutal repression as a carceral state of force and control, both at home and in former colonies and emerging nations which include New Caledonia/Kanaky; in a free society of equals one must lead from the front of the masses as their champion, and not behind the walls of your palace as their tyrant.

    In this moment when state tyranny and terror lies with its throat exposed, let us bring the Chaos. 

    Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort!

French

14 juillet 2024 Un héritage de liberté, d’égalité et de fraternité pour toute l’humanité : 14 juillet 2024

      Nous célébrons aujourd’hui un héritage de Liberté, d’Egalité et de Fraternité pour toute l’humanité, légué par la Révolution en ce jour de 1789 par la prise de la Bastille.

     Je trouve immensément prometteur pour l’avenir de l’humanité que la France, une nation où la protestation est historiquement considérée comme un acte patriotique à l’exception bizarre de la répression par de Gaulle des manifestations de mai 1968 et de la répression par Macron de la vague actuelle provenant de Marseille comme un parallèle des protestations américaines Black Lives Matter du Summer of Fire 2020, symptôme du racisme systémique et de l’inégalité des pouvoirs qui fait écho à l’ère de l’Algérie coloniale et de l’effondrement naissant de notre démocratie et de la civilisation mondiale, célèbre comme événement fondateur la prise d’une prison , et une qui était en partie destinée à servir d’évasion au poète lauréat de la Révolution, le marquis de Sade. Il avait crié à la foule depuis la fenêtre de sa cellule que les geôliers exécutaient des prisonniers ; il fut malheureusement emmené à l’asile de fous de Charenton avant d’être libéré, épisode immortalisé par Peter Weiss dans Marat/Sade. Libéré par la Révolution, de Sade est devenu un chef de file de l’aile radicale des Jacobins, jusqu’à ce que sa belle élégie pour Marat se heurte aux desseins de Robespierre et le conduise à nouveau en prison.

      Quand je me décris et me considère comme un Jacobin en termes d’identité politique, je pense à la relation entre Marat et de Sade comme espaces négatifs l’un de l’autre et à l’inégalité systémique du pouvoir comme origine du mal et l’anneau wagnérien de la peur, le pouvoir et la force qui renversent les prises de pouvoir révolutionnaires en tant que tyrannie.

      Pendant son séjour à la Bastille, il a écrit l’une des interrogations les plus brillantes et les plus transgressives sur les origines du mal dans un pouvoir inégal dans sa violence incarnée en tant qu’Église et État, 120 jours de Sodome. Chaque mot en est toujours vrai et s’applique à toutes les tyrannies de la force et du contrôle, aux États totalitaires et autoritaires de toutes sortes et à ma pensée fascisme en particulier, telle qu’elle est interprétée par le grand Pasolini dans le film, comme symptômes de la maladie de la peur, du pouvoir , et forcer. Lisez-le avec son ouvrage complémentaire, Les origines du totalitarisme par Hannah Arendt.

“PASOLINI : Je prévois simplement de remplacer le mot “Dieu”, tel que de Sade l’utilise, par le mot “pouvoir”. Les sadiques sont toujours les puissants. Ces quatre messieurs de l’histoire sont un banquier, un duc, un évêque et un juge. Ils représentent la puissance constituée. L’analogie est évidente, et je ne l’ai pas inventée. Je ne fais qu’ajouter quelque chose qui m’appartient et je le complique en le mettant à jour.

BACHMANN : Quelle est la signification restante et continue du travail de de Sade ?

PASOLINI : Le fait que le corps devienne une marchandise. Mon film est conçu comme une métaphore sexuelle, qui symbolise, de manière visionnaire, la relation entre exploiteur et exploité. Dans le sadisme et dans la politique du pouvoir, les êtres humains deviennent des objets. Cette similitude est la base idéologique du film.

      Pour une étude plus approfondie de de Sade en tant que figure centrale de la Révolution, je vous renvoie à The Sadeian Woman and the Ideology of Pornography d’Angela Carter, une interprétation féministe qui informe tout son travail, The Fan-Maker’s Inquisition: A Novel of the Marquis de Sade de Rikki Ducornet et Le marquis de Sade : une vie de Neil Schaeffer.

       Ma liste de lecture sur la Révolution française comprend Citizens de Simon Schama, The Days of the French Revolution de Christopher Hibbert et A Place of Greater Safety de Hilary Mantel.

       En tant que sources causales de la révolution mondiale contre le système de la monarchie aristocratique et de la religion d’État, les révolutions américaine et française sont une vague de démocratie et de droits humains universels qui ont radicalement réinventé les relations sociales humaines, l’être, le sens et la valeur, et continuent de se propager à travers le monde. monde. Il a trouvé des échos dans la révolution russe et dans la lutte anticoloniale en Inde et presque partout sur terre alors que l’humanité se réveillait de sa longue obscurité en tant que tyrannies de maîtres et d’esclaves.

       Aujourd’hui, ses valeurs et ses idéaux se manifestent dans les révolutions et les mouvements de libération à travers le monde, à Hong Kong, en Palestine et en Ukraine, parmi ces lieux où j’ai voyagé en solidarité avec les luttes de leurs peuples, ceux que Franz Fanon appelait “Les damnés du Terre », et que notre Statue de la Liberté proclame les « masses entassées aspirant à être libres ».

       Que signifie la Liberté pour nous aujourd’hui ?

       Mémoire, histoire et identité ; un processus de devenir humain et un terrain de lutte entre nos ancrages et nos aspirations, et un en mouvement constant et un état de changement ; impermanent, éphémère, protéiforme, façonné par le dynamisme entre authenticité et falsification alors que nous errons dans un désert de miroirs, de mensonges et d’illusions d’autorité qui cherchent à nous capturer, à nous déformer et à nous subjuguer, à nous asservir et à voler nos âmes.

    C est la première révolution de toute l’humanité ; la lutte pour nous créer en tant qu’êtres autonomes, libres des identités autorisées et de la tyrannie des idées de vertu des autres, contre les forces de déshumanisation et les hégémonies élitaires de la richesse, du pouvoir et des privilèges, les divisions de l’altérité exclusive et les fascismes du sang, de la foi, et le sol, et les inégalités et les injustices de la terreur d’État, la répression de la dissidence, la violence institutionnelle, la force et le contrôle.

      Devenir nous-mêmes est la première révolution dans laquelle nous devons tous lutter, dont d’autres formes de lutte révolutionnaire sont des échos et des reflets, et elles sont unies dans la lutte pour la propriété et le contrôle de notre identité en tant qu’aspects d’une émergence commune de l’être humain, sens, et valeur.

      Refuser de se soumettre est le premier acte humain qui confère la liberté, car celui qui ne peut être contrôlé est libre. En ce moment de résistance à l’autorité et à la tyrannie, nous devenons invaincus, chacun si nous sommes des zones autonomes vivantes et des agents du chaos, de la liberté, de la réimagination et de la transformation de l’humanité.

      Ouvrons les portes de nos prisons et soyons libres.

    En ce 14 juillet, des manifestants ont hué leur président lors de son défilé, incendié son restaurant préféré et escarmouche avec la police à Paris, pas encore une vraie révolution puisqu’il n’y était pas à l’époque ; c’est le même point de bascule auquel Louis XVI a été confronté le 5 octobre 1789 lorsque le peuple a assiégé Versailles et exigé son retour à Paris. Tout n’est pas encore perdu ; la République peut encore être sauvée.

      En ce moment de décision, je vous dis Macron et à tous ceux qui rencontrent la protestation non pas avec la réparation des griefs mais avec la répression brutale comme un état carcéral de force et de contrôle ; dans une société libre d’égaux, il faut diriger devant les masses comme leur champion, et non derrière les murs de votre palais comme leur tyran.

      Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort!     

Les Misérables – Do You Hear The People Sing?

I Dreamed a Dream -film trailer

Valjean’s death

Les Misérables   full soundtrack

Marat/Sade film

Quills film trailer

Javert, I mean Emmanuel Macron, booed during Bastille Day parade in Paris

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2023/jul/14/emmanuel-macron-is-booed-bastille-day-parade-paris-video

Protesters set fire to a restaurant favoured by Macron and clash with police in Paris, not yet a true revolution as he was not in it at the time; this is the identical tipping point faced by Louis XVI on 5 October 1789 when the people besieged Versailles and demanded he return to Paris. All is not yet lost; the Republic can still be saved.

     In this moment of decision, I say to you Macron and to all who meet protest not with redress of grievances but with brutal repression as a carceral state of force and control; in a free society of equals one must lead from the front of the masses as their champion, and not behind the walls of your palace as their tyrant. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2023/apr/06/france-protesters-set-fire-restaurant-macron-clash-police-paris-video

Fireworks at the Eiffel Tower tonight, beautiful but not so beautiful as the fires of liberty which continue to burn throughout France

The Wretched of the Earth, by Frantz Fanon, Jean-Paul Sartre (Preface)

The Origins of Totalitarianism, by Hannah Arendt

                The French Revolution, a reading list

Citizens, by Simon Schama

The Days of the French Revolution, by Christopher Hibbert

A Place of Greater Safety, by Hilary Mantel

City of Darkness, City of Light, by Marge Piercy

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/862108.City_of_Darkness_City_of_Light

A New World Begins: The History of the French Revolution, by Jeremy D. Popkin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/45031867-a-new-world-begins

The Coming of the French Revolution, by Georges Lefebvre, R.R. Palmer (Translator), Timothy Tackett (Introduction)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/189555.The_Coming_of_the_French_Revolution

Liberty or Death: The French Revolution, by Peter McPhee

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26876327-liberty-or-death

A People’s History of the French Revolution, by Eric Hazan

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20177066-a-people-s-history-of-the-french-revolution

Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution, by Lynn Hunt

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/381792.Politics_Culture_and_Class_in_the_French_Revolution

Revolutionary Ideas: An Intellectual History of the French Revolution from The Rights of Man to Robespierre, by Jonathan I. Israel

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18118675-revolutionary-ideas

Twelve Who Ruled: The Year of the Terror in the French Revolution, by R.R. Palmer

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/196977.Twelve_Who_Ruled

Liberty: The Lives and Times of Six Women in Revolutionary France,

by Lucy Moore

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/135019.Liberty

Virtue and Terror, by Maximilien Robespierre, Slavoj Žižek (Introduction)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/90565.Virtue_and_Terror

Fatal Purity: Robespierre and the French Revolution, by Ruth Scurr

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/626414.Fatal_Purity

Choosing Terror: Virtue, Friendship, and Authenticity in the French Revolution,

by Marisa Linton

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18263288-choosing-terror

Les Misérables, by Victor Hugo, Norman Denny (Translator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33175.Les_Mis_rables

Diderot and the Art of Thinking Freely, Andrew S. Curran

Encyclopedic Liberty: Political Articles in the Dictionary of Diderot and D’Alembert, Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d’Alembert, Henry C. Clark (Editor)

The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness 1680-1790, Ritchie Robertson

                       de Sade, a reading list

The Fan-Maker’s Inquisition: A Novel of the Marquis de Sade, by Rikki Ducornet

The Marquis de Sade: A Life, by Neil Schaeffer

The Sadeian Woman: And the Ideology of Pornography, by Angela Carter

The Marquis de Sade and the Avant-Garde, by Alyce Mahon

Literature and Evil, by Georges Bataille

Pasolini on de Sade: An Interview during the Filming of ‘Salò or the 120 Days of Sodom’, by Gideon Bachmann

The Marquis de Sade: An Essay by Simone de Beauvoir

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/141422.The_Marquis_de_Sade

July 13 2024 The Flag of My Skin

    Here is a poem which I originally wrote in French for a publisher in Switzerland, a nation with four official languages including German, Italian, and Romansh, and where place name conventions and other government business is conducted in Latin. I have often used its title, a phrase of my own invention, to refer to identity politics and the construction of ideas of race and nationality as authorized identities and an imposed condition of struggle, divisions of belonging and exclusionary otherness, and fascisms of blood and soil.

     In my journals I refer to this idea in terms of the redemptive power of love, an interrogation of what is human, and how we may reply to death. I find it bears a definition in context; here then is my poem, and may it serve you as a Rashomon Gate event of transformation and liberation.

    On one face of this coin, the tyrant Janus; the terror of our nothingness, commodification, falsification, dehumanization, abjection, and theft of the soul. On its reverse the liberator Janus; the joy of total freedom, seizure of power, self ownership, love which exalts us beyond the limits of our flesh and the discovery of our best selves as truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh.

     A maker of mischief, I; named for the god of Chaos, Jay being a form of Janus, Roman god of doors and Guardian of the Gates, change, fate, beginnings and endings, who faces both directions of time and being at once. My mother said her immediate inspiration was Dr. Seuss’ figure of anarchy as a Trickster god in his iconic 1957 book The Cat in the Hat, and at times introduced me as Thing One and Thing Two, dyadic beings or a being with two forms who always do the opposite of what they are told, characters which reference Lewis Carroll’s court jesters as agents of subversion Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

     Non Serviam, I Will Not Serve, the declaration with which Milton’s great hero  launches his rebellion in Paradise Lost, a legacy of freedom given to me by my mother as an informing, motivating, and shaping force enfolded into my name.

     Becoming human as a process of identity formation, self-construal or personae which is the word for a character mask which actors speak through in classical Greek theatre and which I believe describes identity as a performance and a narrative structure with precision, clarity, and great explanatory power, remains fluid, ambiguous, relative, ephemeral, and a primary ground of struggle.

     Who chooses how we are to be defined, the boundaries between our limits and the possibilities of what we may become?

     This is the first question to ask of any story; whose story is this? 

     To make an idea about a kind of people is an act of violence.       

      Let us abandon this claiming and naming, taxonomies of identification and hierarchies of belonging and exclusionary otherness, this use of social force as ideas of virtue, beauty, normality, membership, nation, of the violence of us and them. For until our boundaries become interfaces, the leading edges of such identities draw blood.

     When we have escaped the legacies of our history and created ourselves anew as autonomous beings bound by nothing but our own visions and desires, what have we become, and who are we then?

     Whoever we wish to be.

                     The Flag of My Skin

Time, memory, history, identity, and the revolution of becoming ourselves;

the skin I have escaped in serpentine transformation has become a flag,

but of what nation?

Who owns this kingdom of flesh that we share?

This realm of the senses is both a boundary we must transgress

to discover ourselves and seize ownership of our freedom and being,

and an interface by which we shape each other, a propulsive and generative force of the human sublime, of truths written in our skin.

We are interdependent, vast and oceanic beings, exalted by our passion beyond the limits of our form but also autonomous individuals who create ourselves and one another over enormous gulfs of time, limitless in our possibilities of becoming human but also forms described as negative spaces of each other.

Being is a dance of myriad partnerships, transforms of messages and principles of organization and growth which are recursive, chaotic, a beauty of strangeness and the bizarre, a realm of Medusa, goddess and monster.

There is but one rule in nature; anything goes.

Who authorizes and validates the possibilities and performances of our identity?

Shall we not dethrone, mock, and challenge such tyrannies of normality?

Let us forge an art of fire by which to liberate us from the shells of our history, a poetics of revolution by which to incite, provoke, and disturb.

There are no maps of the unknown; only of the history written in our form of how we solved problems of adaptation, assigned values, interpreted meanings, and created ourselves through our anchorages of civilization, a prochronism whose purpose is to buffer the shock of change and shield identity from loss.

Yet it is this history and memory we must escape to create ourselves anew as we wander this wilderness of mirrors and of echoes, a labyrinth of shifting paths which leads both inward to our true selves and outward to other peoples and to their different truths and possibilities of becoming human.

Our senses are transducers through which we change energy into messages and topologies of reality; it is this logosphere within which we live and from which we arise and recreate ourselves continually, transcendent and surreal.

Humans are a system for transforming things into ideas.

So also do we transform our world and each other by our ideas, the real and the ideal reflecting and shaping each other in recursion. And this revolutionary and ongoing coevolution and process of becoming human is the central creative force of existence and of humankind.

The struggle for ownership of identity between the masks that others make for us and those we make for ourselves is the first revolution in which we all must fight.  And what of the flag of our skin, of our history which we have unwound from ourselves as an endless scroll of signs, as a shroud, a chrysalis?

This I leave to you, to those we claim and who in turn claim us, to others who are different as well as those alike, and to us all.

We may belong to our past, but the future belongs to us.

It is yours and ours, the undiscovered country; use it wisely.

Prolouge

7 juillet 2024 Le drapeau de ma peau

 Voici un poème que j’ai écrit à l’origine en français pour un éditeur en Suisse, un pays avec quatre langues officielles dont l’allemand, l’italien et le romanche, et où les conventions de toponymie et autres affaires gouvernementales se déroulent en latin. J’ai souvent utilisé son titre, une expression de ma propre invention, pour faire référence aux politiques identitaires et à la construction d’idées de race et de nationalité en tant qu’identités autorisées et conditions de lutte imposées, aux divisions d’appartenance et à l’altérité d’exclusion, et aux fascismes du sang et du sang. sol.

 Dans mes journaux, j’évoque cette idée en termes de pouvoir rédempteur de l’amour, d’interrogation sur ce qui est humain et sur la façon dont nous pouvons répondre à la mort. Je trouve qu’il porte une définition dans son contexte ; voici donc mon poème, et puisse-t-il vous servir d’événement de transformation et de libération de la Porte Rashomon.

 Sur une face de cette pièce, le tyran Janus ; la terreur de notre néant, la marchandisation, la falsification, la déshumanisation, l’abjection et le vol de l’âme. Sur son revers le libérateur Janus ; la joie de la liberté totale, la prise du pouvoir, la propriété de soi, l’amour qui nous exalte au-delà des limites de notre chair et la découverte du meilleur de nous-mêmes comme vérités immanentes à la nature et inscrites dans notre chair.

 Je suis un faiseur de mal ; nommé d’après le dieu du Chaos, Jay étant une forme de Janus, dieu romain des portes et gardien des portes, du changement, du destin, des débuts et des fins, qui fait face aux deux directions du temps et de l’être à la fois. Ma mère a dit que son inspiration immédiate était la figure de l’anarchie du Dr Seuss en tant que dieu filou dans son livre emblématique de 1957, Le chat au chapeau, et m’a parfois présenté comme Thing One et Thing Two, des êtres dyadiques ou un être à deux formes qui font toujours le contraire de ce qu’on leur dit, des personnages qui font référence aux bouffons de la cour de Lewis Carroll comme des agents de subversion Tweedledum et Tweedledee.

 Non Serviam, I Will Not Serve, la déclaration par laquelle le grand héros de Milton lance sa rébellion dans Paradise Lost, un héritage de liberté que ma mère m’a donné comme force d’information, de motivation et de modelage enfermée dans mon nom.

 Devenir humain en tant que processus de formation d’identité, de construction de soi ou de personae, qui est le mot désignant un masque de personnage à travers lequel les acteurs parlent dans le théâtre grec classique et qui, je crois, décrit l’identité comme une performance et une structure narrative avec précision, clarté et grande pouvoir explicatif, reste fluide, ambigu, relatif, éphémère et un terrain de lutte primordial.

 Qui choisit la manière dont nous devons être définis, les frontières entre nos limites et les possibilités de ce que nous pouvons devenir ?

 C’est la première question à poser à propos de toute histoire ; à qui est cette histoire ?

 Se faire une idée sur un type de personnes est un acte de violence.

 Abandonnons cette revendication et cette nomination, les taxonomies d’identification et les hiérarchies d’appartenance et d’altérité d’exclusion, cette utilisation de la force sociale comme idées de vertu, de beauté, de normalité, d’appartenance, de nation, de violence de nous et d’eux. Car jusqu’à ce que nos frontières deviennent des interfaces, les contours de ces identités font couler le sang.

 Lorsque nous avons échappé aux héritages de notre histoire et nous sommes recréés en tant qu’êtres autonomes liés par rien d’autre que nos propres visions et désirs, que sommes-nous devenus et qui sommes-nous alors ?

 Celui que nous souhaitons être.

Le drapeau de ma peau

Le temps, la mémoire, l’histoire, l’identité et la révolution de devenir nous-mêmes;

la peau que j’ai échappée dans la transformation serpentine est devenue un drapeau,

mais de quelle nation?

À qui appartient ce royaume de chair que nous partageons?

Ce royaume des sens est à la fois une frontière que nous devons transgresser

de se découvrir et de s’approprier notre liberté et notre être,

et une interface par laquelle nous nous façonnons, force propulsive et génératrice du sublime humain, de vérités écrites dans notre peau.

Nous sommes des êtres interdépendants, vastes et océaniques, exaltés par notre passion au-delà des limites de notre forme mais aussi des individus autonomes qui se créent et se créent au-dessus d’énormes gouffres de temps, sans limites dans nos possibilités de devenir humain mais aussi des formes décrites comme des espaces négatifs de L’une et l’autre.

L’être est une danse de myriades de partenariats, de transformations de messages et de principes d’organisation et de croissance qui sont récursifs, chaotiques, une beauté d’étrangeté et de bizarre, un royaume de Méduse, déesse et monstre.

Il n’y a qu’une seule règle dans la nature; tout va.

Qui autorise et valide les possibilités et les performances de notre identité?

Ne détrônerons-nous pas, ne nous moquerons-nous pas de ces tyrannies de la normalité?

Forgeons un art du feu pour nous libérer des coquilles de notre histoire, une poétique de la révolution pour inciter, provoquer et troubler.

Il n’y a pas de cartes de l’inconnu; seulement de l’histoire écrite sous notre forme de la façon dont nous avons résolu les problèmes d’adaptation, assigné des valeurs, interprété des significations, et nous nous sommes créés à travers nos ancrages de civilisation, un prochronisme dont le but est d’amortir le choc du changement et de protéger l’identité de la perte.

Pourtant, c’est à cette histoire et à cette mémoire que nous devons échapper pour nous recréer en nous promenant dans ce désert de miroirs et d’échos, un labyrinthe de chemins changeants qui mène à la fois vers nous-mêmes et vers d’autres peuples et vers leurs différentes vérités et possibilités. de devenir humain.

Nos sens sont des transducteurs par lesquels nous transformons l’énergie en messages et en topologies de réalité; c’est cette logosphère à l’intérieur de laquelle nous vivons et dont nous surgissons et nous recréons continuellement, transcendante et surréaliste.

Les humains sont un système pour transformer les choses en idées.

De même, nous transformons notre monde et les uns les autres par nos idées, le réel et l’idéal se reflétant et se façonnant mutuellement en récursivité. Et cette coévolution et ce processus révolutionnaires et continus de devenir humain sont la force créatrice centrale de l’existence et de l’humanité.

La lutte pour la propriété de l’identité entre les masques que les autres fabriquent pour nous et ceux que nous fabriquons pour nous-mêmes est la première révolution dans laquelle nous devons tous lutter. Et qu’en est-il du drapeau de notre peau, de notre histoire que nous avons déroulée de nous-mêmes comme un rouleau de signes sans fin, comme un linceul, une chrysalide?

Je vous laisse ceci, à ceux que nous revendiquons et qui à notre tour nous réclament, à ceux qui sont différents ainsi qu’à ceux qui nous ressemblent, et à nous tous.

Nous pouvons appartenir à notre passé, mais l’avenir nous appartient.

C’est le vôtre et le nôtre, le pays inconnu; fais-en bon usage.

      And here is my celebration of Chaos:                   

January 2 2023 Begin We the Festival of Janus

      Janus represents the principles of change, duality, transformation, and the interfaces between bounded realms, though we know him now mainly as a god of Chaos through his portrayal in Halloween, episode six of season two, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

      He is called the Gatekeeper, a guardian and guide of the soul on our journeys through the myriad possibilities of the multiverse and its limitless futures, roles primary to dreamwork, ecstatic trance, and poetic vision, aligned with the mysteries of Orpheus, Asclepius, and Dionysius, whose role as god of beginnings and endings echoes the primary role of Ganesha as opener of the ways. Janus shares with Saturn or Chronos his role as Old Father Time. 

     Plutarch describes Janus in his Life of Numa; “For this Janus, in remote antiquity, whether he was a demi-god or a king, was a patron of civil and social order, and is said to have lifted human life out of its bestial and savage state. For this reason he is represented with two faces, implying that he brought men’s lives out of one sort and condition into another.”

     Ovid writes of Janus in his Fasti; “But what god am I to say thou art, Janus of double-shape? for Greece hath no divinity like thee. The reason, too, unfold why alone of all the heavenly ones thou doest see both back and front.”

    My name, Jay, is a form of the name Janus, though also derived from the Latin name Gaius, “to be joyful”; if we are an unfolding of our ancestor’s actions, intentions, dreams, visions, and wishes, part of the history which possesses us as DNA and inhabits us as stories, I imagine being named for the god of Chaos, time, and poetic vision, a name which also suggests states of rapture and exaltation, may have been a shaping force in becoming who I am, a kind of spell cast by my mother who named me so.

     Who did my parents want me to become? When as a child I asked my mother why she named me Jay, she said; “It means new beginnings. I wanted you to know you can do anything, be whomever you choose, right now, every moment, every time you hear your name. And whatever uniqueness and truth you create will be just as right and true as anyone else’s.” She said her immediate inspiration was Dr. Seuss’ figure of anarchy as a Trickster god in The Cat in the Hat, and at times introduced me as Thing One and Thing Two.

     When I asked my father as a teenager, he said; “Who is Jay? You tell me.”

     Of myself in my chosen role as a Bringer of Chaos, transgressions of the Forbidden, violations of normality, and liberation from the tyranny of other peoples ideas of virtue I have written often, also of Chaos as the adaptive range of systems and both destructive and creative forces of nature, of fracture, disruption, delegitimation, and the collapse of order, law, and authority as revolutionary struggle. In the context of the Festival of Janus I mention here that it can also become, as Foucault described,  a sacred calling in pursuit of truth.

    His startling image of wholeness as a dyadic figure with two faces which may be assigned to any oppositional forces, masks of comedy and tragedy from which developed theatre and the idea of the soul or individual personal self as personae, roles we play, from ritual performances in times of great peril and threat to discover and create paths forward into the future, but is also an image of the masculine and feminine sides of a whole person. In Janus we have at the origin and heart of our civilization a figure and festival of counternarrative and subversion of patriarchy and authorized identities of sex and gender, and a celebration of idealizations of masculine and feminine beauty which also interrogates them. Go ahead, frighten the horses.

     Herein we may perform those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh, and create and discover our own truths through performance of our best selves.

      To begin our Festival of Janus at the birth of the new year, I invite you to play a game with me; a Game of Possible Selves. Choose six characters you would like to perform, traditionally in the Roman Festival of Janus three male and three female though any will do, as nature has but one rule; anything goes. If nothing else, randomizing identities as theatre and creative play will tell you what you value, and who you should be looking for in partners as instruments through whom we create ourselves. Write them down, cast a six sided dice, and let the dice decide who you will be today. No matter who you perform, you will still have five identities in reserve, and tomorrow is another day.

     That one twelfth of our year is dedicated to Janus as January, figure of the new year, should tell us of his importance in our civilization, and the centrality of Chaos, transformation, rebirth, and change to our historical constructions of identity and its legacies which we drag behind us as shadow selves, like an invisible reptilian tail.

     Here I think of patriarchy and sexual terror, white supremacist terror and the epigenetic trauma of slavery and the Holocaust, divisions of exclusionary otherness and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.

     And in the context of the shadows of historical and systemic inequalities and injustices, atavisms of instinct and fear weaponized in service to power and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, the liminal time of the new year during the month of January, sacred to change and the emergence of the new like a serpent sloughing off its old skin, is a gate of entrance into the world for hope, that final curse or gift of Pandora, in the midst of our public trauma and grieving since the capture of America by the Fourth Reich in the Stolen Election of 2016 and the final act of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump in the January 6 Insurrection, and the endless chasms of darkness, subversions of our democracy, perversions of our values, and violations of our ideals we have all endured since.

     For the principle of change offers us a transformational moment of decision in which all things are possible, and we may escape the consequences of our histories in creating ourselves anew.

      Who then shall we become? Asks our self of surfaces, images, and masks which each moment negotiates our boundaries with others. 

     To which our secret self, the self of darkness and of passion, the self that lives beyond the mirror and knows no limits, unbound by time and space and infinite in possibilities, replies; Who do you want to become? 

     Here follow excerpts from some of the people who have written beautifully of Janus.

     As written on the Anderson Lock website; “The ancient Romans had a specific god who held the key, so to speak, to the metaphorical doors or gateways between what was and what is to come—the liminal space of transitioning out of one period of time and into something new.

     In Roman mythology, Janus was the god of doors, gates, and transitions. Janus represented the middle ground between both concrete and abstract dualities such as life/death, beginning/end, youth/adulthood, rural/urban, war/peace, and barbarism/civilization.

     Janus was known as the initiator of human life, transformations between stages of life, and shifts from one historical era to another. Ancient Romans believed Janus ruled over life events such as weddings, births, and deaths. He oversaw seasonal events such as planting, harvests, seasonal changes, and the new year.

     According to Roman mythology, Janus was present at the beginning of the world. As the god of gates, Janus guarded the gates of heaven and held access to heaven and other gods. For this reason, Janus was often invoked first in ancient Roman religious ceremonies, and during public sacrifices, offerings were given to Janus before any other deity. In fact, there is evidence that Janus was worshipped long before many of the other Roman gods, dating all the way back to the time of Romulus (the founder and first ruler of Rome).

     And if you’ve ever wondered how the month of January got its name, you have Janus to thank. As the Roman god of beginnings and transitions, Janus is the namesake of January, the first month of a new year.

     Why does Janus have two faces? What is unusual about the god Janus is his iconic image. As the god of transitions and dualities, Janus is portrayed with two faces—one facing the past, and one facing the future. He also holds a key in his right hand, which symbolizes his protection of doors, gates, thresholds, and other separations or openings between spatial boundaries. In ancient Rome, the symbol of the key also signified that a traveler has come to find safe harbor or trade goods in peace.”

     As written by Caillan Davenport in The Conversation; “January 1 can be a day of regret and reflection – did I really need that fifth glass of bubbly last night? – mixed with hope and optimism for the future, as we make plans to renew gym memberships or finally sort out our tax files. This January ritual of looking forward and backward is fitting for the first day of a month named after Janus, the Roman god of beginnings and endings.

     Doorkeeper of the heavens

     In Roman mythology, Janus was a king of Latium (a region of central Italy), who had his palace on the Janiculum hill, on the western bank of the River Tiber. According to the Roman intellectual Macrobius, Janus was given divine honours on account of his own religious devotion, as he set a pious example for all his people.

     Janus was proudly venerated as a uniquely Roman god, rather than one adopted from the Greek pantheon. All forms of transition came within his purview – beginnings and endings, entrances, exits, and passageways. The name Janus (Ianus in Latin, as the alphabet had no j) is etymologically related to ianua, the Latin word for door. Janus himself was the ianitor, or doorkeeper, of the heavens.

    The cult statue of Janus depicted the god bearded with two heads. This meant that he could see forwards and backwards and inside and outside simultaneously without turning around. Janus held a staff in his right hand, in order to guide travellers along the correct route, and a key in his left to open gates.

     War and Peace

     Janus is famously associated with the transition between peace and war. Numa, the legendary second king of Rome, who was famed for his religious piety, is said to have founded a shrine to Janus Geminus (“two-fold”) in the Roman Forum, close to the Senate House. It was located in the place where Janus had bubbled up a spring of hot boiling water in order to thwart an attack on Rome by the Sabines.

     The shrine was an enclosure formed by two arched gates at each end, joined together by walls to form a passageway. A bronze statue of Janus stood in the middle, with one head facing towards each gate. According to the historian Livy, Numa intended the shrine; “as an index of peace and war, that when open it might signify that the nation was in arms, when closed that all the peoples round about were pacified.”

     The gates of Janus are said to have stayed closed for 43 years under Numa, but rarely remained so thereafter, although the first emperor Augustus boasted that he closed the shrine three times. Nero later celebrated his conclusion of peace with Parthia by minting coins showing the gates of Janus firmly shut.

Happy New Year

     Romans believed that the month of January was added to the calendar by Numa. The association between Janus and the calendar was cemented by the construction of 12 altars, one for each month of the year, in Janus’s temple in the Forum Holitorium (the vegetable market). The poet Martial thus described Janus as “the progenitor and father of the years”.

     From 153 BC onwards, the consuls (the chief magistrates of the Republic) took office on the first day of January (which the Romans called the Kalends). The new consuls offered prayers to Janus, and priests dedicated spelt mixed with salt and a traditional barley cake, known as the ianual, to the god. Romans distributed New Year’s gifts of dates, figs, and honey to their friends, in the hope that the year ahead would turn out to be sweet, as well as coins – a sign of hoped-for prosperity.

     Janus assumed a key role in all Roman public sacrifices, receiving incense and wine first before other deities. This was because, as the doorkeeper of the heavens, Janus was the route through which one reached the other gods, even Jupiter himself. The text On Agriculture, written by Cato the Elder, describes how offerings would be made to Janus, Jupiter, and Juno as part of the pre-harvest sacrifice to ensure a good crop.

     So if you’re feeling caught between two worlds this January 1, why not head outside and celebrate Roman-style?”

     As written by Michael Shanks of the Janus Initiative, which he defines as “archaeological perspectives on understanding and managing change and innovation”; “Our case is that being mindful of the past, hindsight, is essential to being able to act for the future. Looking back, researching and exploring, that we might be better prepared for uncertain futures.

     This is not about history – knowing what happened in the past. JANUS is about an archaeological sensibility – connecting (what remains of) the past with the future through our experiences and actions now.

     Janus? Janus was the Roman divinity associated with transition, passages from pasts through to futures, windows, doorways and thresholds.

     Simultaneously looking back and forward, Janus connects pasts and futures, gaining perspective with hindsight and foresight, finding orientation now, not by telling the story of the past, not by predicting what is to come, but by seeking relationships, passages, flows from the past, ways the past lingers to haunt, hinder, and inspire the building of the future.

      The scene offers insights into relationships between temporality and agency – our capacity to matter, to make things happen – exactly the themes we are foregrounding in our initiative.”

     The power of story: A quick recap of the story in needed to understand the connections.

     Cronos (Kronos, Cronus) was the youngest of the first generation of Titans, giant offspring of primordial Ouranos (Heaven) and Gaia (Earth). Ouranos offended Gaia by imprisoning some of their younger offspring and she sought revenge by persuading Cronos to move against his father. With a stone sickle, gift from Gaia, Cronos castrated Ouranos and threw the bloody parts into the ocean, from which Venus (Aphrodite) emerged.

     His actions haunted Cronos. Fearing that one of his own offspring would turn against him, he ate them all as they were born, devouring a threatening future. His wife Rhea eventually put a stop to this when she hid Zeus and tricked Cronos to swallow a stone instead, wrapped as a new-born. Zeus returned in his maturity, poisoned Cronos, and defeated him and his Titans with the help of his brother and sister gods, vomited up alive because of the poison emetic.

     Cronos was regularly been associated with Chronos, a divine personification of time. He cut and severed Ouranos, marking the rift between heaven and earth, a gash in eternity. The scythe or sickle has become symbol of the grim reaper harvesting mortal lives.

     Dramatis Personae

     Romano draws Chronos holding an Ouroboros. Serpent devouring its own tail, a symbol since at least antiquity of eternal return, rebirth, reincarnation. The divinity is Aion, cyclical time, unbounded, the circuit of the heavens represented by the Zodiac, the seasons, in contrast to the divisible, empirical and sequential time of Cronus, cut into past, present, and future. Aion is a god of the ages, of saecula, circling generations of life.

     Aion, god of the ages, is within the circuit of the Zodiac, (an eternal mobius strip) between a summer and winter tree. In front is Gaia, Mother Earth, with four children, the four seasons.

     The winged figure is usually taken to be Nike, Victoria, holding out the winner’s crown at the moment of success. But another interpretation is possible.

     This is a scene from the great conflicts between the Titans and the Gods. With Gaia’s help Cronos has seized the opportunity and cut open the heavens. He too will fall when Zeus in turn seizes his opportunity, poisons Cronos and releases the Olympians to overthrow the Titans. Son of Cronos, or perhaps brother, the god of seizing an opportunity to act is Kairos. And Kairos is usually depicted as a winged youth, and as weighing opportunities in a scale balanced on a knife edge.

     Kairos is time to act, or not. A central principle of rhetoric, the art of persuasion, Kairos is a passing instant when an opening appears to be driven through (there are links with shooting an arrow and passing a weaving shuttle through warp and weft). The key to agency, one’s capacity to achieve, to realize potential, is the ability to adapt to and take advantage of changing, complex and contingent circumstances. This is Kairos.

    Janus stands by, a horrified witness. Romano has modeled the god(dess) on Aphrodite, who had been born of the castrated heavens, Cronos cutting eternity. Janus is involved, part of the many stories woven in and through this group of four characters or principles, seeing the interconnections between eternity and event, birth and mortality, persuasion and action, planning and opportunity, the return of the past to take vengeance.

     Time, decision-making, persuasion, opportunity, action.

     This cast of characters and principles, this dramatis personae, takes us into an allegorical world of time eternal, cyclical, and eventful, of perception, persuasion, decision and action.

     Connections of past through to future potential, the intermingling of hindsight, insight, foresight: these are also the core of an archaeological sensibility and imagination.

     Imagine a person from another time in human history, from any region, race, gender, or religion. No matter the place, time, or status, you will find differences from your present situation. However, one thing remains unchanged: the need to begin again, to follow new paths and to move forward.

     If we look at it through the beliefs of ancient times, we realize that the concept of new beginnings is present throughout the history of human beings. For this reason, I explain the relationship between new beginnings and mythology. Because by looking at the past we can better understand the future.

     In the ancient Rome, they did not escape this need either. They had their own god to whom they used to pray to give them hope and protect their efforts to start afresh.”  

Ritual of Janus as a god of Chaos in “Halloween”, the sixth episode of the second season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer; note the ritual use of masks of our true or possible selves in Halloween trick or treating in connection with Chaos as a sacred path in pursuit of the truth of ourselves

https://buffy.fandom.com/wiki/Halloween

Peter Gabriel – Games Without Frontiers

https://theconversation.com/who-was-janus-the-roman-god-of-beginnings-and-endings-86853

https://scribalo.com/en/scribablog/new-beginnings-and-mythology-janus-the-romans-god/

https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/janus-words-sanction-and-cleave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus

https://www.lionsroar.com/the-wisdom-in-the-dark-emotions/

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started