A crow confronts his image in a pool of water, and as Nietzsche warned the darkness looks back. Of this I have written a paragraph on the Nietzschean idea of the Abyss, and of tragedy as failure to embrace our monstrosity and those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh; the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves.
Here also is a fable for Memorial Day and the sacred dead of war, at whose table I have eaten many times now.
As Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil goes; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”
It is also an origin of evil as the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; written in the tyrannies and systems of unequal power which hold humankind in their iron grip of force and control as Kristevan abjection, despair, and learned helplessness, and the ecological catastrophe which threatens our species extinction as disconnection from nature, control of nature as capitalist exploitation of resources and theft of the commons, carceral states of force and control as embodied violence, and our falsification, commodification, and dehumanization through the Wilderness of Mirrors.
All of this requires the renouncement of love, as Wagner’s figure of tyranny Alberich the Dwarf must do to seize the Ring of power and dominion, a story more familiar to us as Tolkien’s retelling of the Nibelungenlied in his trilogy of novels which recast World War Two as an allegory of the abandonment of addiction to power. This has a corollary; the redemptive power of love, like the power of poetic vision to reimagine and transform ourselves, can free us from the Ring of Power and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.
As written by Jean Genet in Miracle of the Rose; “A man must dream a long time in order to act with grandeur, and dreaming is nursed in darkness.”
Here follows the paragraph of my thoughts on seeing this image, which if considered as a poem I now think of as the True and False Crows: a fable.
Who is this imposter? If he is me, where now am I? Avaunt, my nemesis, for I shall pursue retribution for this theft of myself beyond all wrath now remembered, through death and hell and the terrors of our nightmares. Come and let us grapple for the truth of ourselves in this place where angels fear, and end not in silence but in exaltation and fire, with roars of defiance hurled against the chasms of our nothingness, supernal and magnificent as the Morningstar, and illuminate for all humankind the path of escape from this prison of illusions and lies.
To this my sister replied, Such poetry!
This is as direct as I can be, O my sister. Should I merit some kind of monument one day, an absurd fantasy as I mean nothing to history and will vanish from the world without a trace, and nothing to anyone beyond yourself as the remnants of family, Dolly as my partner, and those few friends and allies who know my true story and identity which I have tried to leave a record of here in my journal Torch of Liberty, inscribe this therein.
I have tried to salvage something of our humanity and to become a fulcrum and change the balance of power in the world these past forty years since I was sworn to the oath of the Resistance by Jean Genet, and often failed, but this is not what is important.
What is important is to refuse to submit.
And one thing more; to act with solidarity in revolutionary struggle. As the Oath of the Resistance created in Paris 1940 by Jean Genet from the oath of the Foreign Legion in which he once served, and given to me in Beirut 1982 in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a Last Stand beyond hope of victory or survival, and which I offer to all of you as a tradition to bear forward into the future; “We swear ourselves to each other, to resist and cease not, and abandon not our fellows.”
In this my chosen life mission I have held true, for if each and every one of us stands in solidarity with others regardless of how different they may be from ourselves, we will become liberators and guarantors of each other’s uniqueness, and in refusal to submit will be victorious and free.
He said it was the finest thing he ever stole, the Oath of the Resistance, but I often think of this in terms of a definition of the beauty of human beings; to become Unconquered and free as self created beings in refusal to submit to authority and its instruments of violence, force and control, and the repression of dissent, to refuse our dehumanization and the theft of our souls and autonomy and to do all of this in solidarity and absolute loyalty to each other.
As he once said to me; “Is this not the beauty of men, to resist and never yield, to cede nothing to the enemy, not love nor hope, not our history nor the chance for a future of our own choosing, neither our monstrosity nor our grandeur, nothing of our humanity nor of any human being whose life is in our power to harm or help, to live beyond all limits and all laws and to risk everything to do this for each other?”
Here is our Beauty as Keats defined it in his famous quote; “
I dream of a future something like the future envisioned by Gene Roddenberry in Star Trek. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations; the idea first put forth in the episode Is There In Truth No Beauty?, described in the first issue of the fanzine Inside Star Trek as; “that beauty, growth, progress — all result from the union of the unlike. Concord, as much as discord, requires the presence of at least two different notes. The brotherhood of man is an ideal based on learning to delight in our essential differences, as well as learning to recognize our similarities.” As stated in the episode The Savage Curtain; “I am pleased to see that we have differences. May we together become greater than the sum of both of us.”
Liberty as freedom from authorized identities and truths, and equality and its corollary solidarity; these are the personal and social preconditions of democracy as a free society of equals.
With all of the horrors I have witnessed in a life lived in the unknown spaces of our maps of becoming human marked Here Be Dragons, beyond the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden, through wars and revolutions as a maker of mischief for tyrants and a monster who hunts other monsters for the chance to salvage something of our humanity, though in this I often fail as I did in Mariupol and in the year of the fall of Afghanistan, regardless of the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, something in us refuses to submit to the abjection and learned helplessness of authoritarian systems and reaches toward exaltation and freedom. Whether such hope is a gift or a curse remains for each of us to discover in how we live our lives.
In this I speak to you of truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh; we must embrace our darkness and claim our truths, and celebrate what Walt Whitman called the songs of ourselves as victorious seizures of power, freedom, and joy.
Love and desire are innate capacities of reimagination and transformative rebirth, which like Dorothy’s magic ruby slippers cannot be taken from us and bear the power to send us home to our heart’s desire, to restore to us the self which is truly ours.
My flesh is a map of private holocausts, written with silent screams, nameless loves, causes lost and won, ephemeral signs of our secret histories and the lies and illusions which capture and distort our images in a wilderness of mirrors and the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.
We have but one escape from the limits of our flesh and the flags of our skin; and this is love. In love we transcend ourselves and become exalted; through the redemptive power of love we may heal the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.
Love is crucial both to poetic vision and as solidarity in action as processes of self-construal and becoming human; Siegfried walks through the fire and becomes human. There’s a good retelling of it in Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s musical episode, Once More With Feeling.
Let us always take the risks of our humanity, and place our lives in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.
In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.
Send me out in flames, for this is how I have lived
Not silent but incandescent in the night
An agent of change and illumination, like fire itself
In Celebration of Friedrich Nietzsche
Nietzsche who awakens, Nietzsche who challenges, Nietzsche who illuminates and inspires; these are the three Nietzsche’s who have been my companions throughout life, my guides and muses, and whom I offer you as a Song of Orpheus and Ariadne’s Thread whereby to find your way through the labyrinth of life.
Protean in his forms, he may take whatever shape is needed in your quest; and will play his roles as befitting at different stages of the journey. There are many Nietzsche’s, who like an endless series of dancing Schrodinger’s Cats offer possibilities which echo and reflect those of his readers as an inkblot test. Who is Nietzsche to me?
Friedrich Nietzsche occupies a space in my life and imagination like no other shaping, motivating, and informing source, because my discovery of him in the year before I began high school first broke the Great Chain of Being which bound me to the will of authority and my fellow schoolmates ideas of virtue, truth, and beauty in a theocratic, patriarchal, and racist society aligned with the Apartheid regime of South Africa, and set me free to create myself in a universe without imposed meaning or value; then helped me to process a primary trauma which became a Defining Moment as I joined the liberation struggle of a foreign land whose glittering citadels of splendor concealed horrible truths.
Nietzsche it was who helped me to balance the terror of our nothingness with the joy of total freedom.
When I speak of the enforcement of normality as an evil to be resisted, it is with the voice of the old woman burned alive in her home as a witch by a mob which included fellow children I grew up with. To fully understand Nietzsche, you must inhabit the historical space of liberation from systemic tyranny which his anti-authoritarian iconoclasm represents.
I grew up in such a world, a premodern world bound to the laws of a cruel and implacable Authority of alien and unknowable motives and those who would enslave us and claim to speak in his name as a tyranny of the Elect, whose hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege rely on our commodification as weaponized disparity and theft of the commons, falsification through lies and illusions, subjugation through learned helplessness and divisions of exclusionary otherness, fear as an instrument of the centralization of power by carceral states of force and control through fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, and faith weaponized in service to power as theft of the soul.
Such atavisms of barbarism hold dominion still over much of humankind and possess us as legacies of our history, bound by embedded tyrannies of many kinds, a world America was founded to replace as a free society of equals. Ours is a very fragile civilization, threatened always by chasms of darkness which surround us and with relentless, pervasive, and systemic enemies in fascist tyranny, patriarchal sexual terror, white supremacist terror, the fetishism of death and violence in identitarian nationalism and its police states and imperial militarism, and dehumanization. This we must resist, and I read Thus Spake Zarathustra as a luminous song of resistance.
Among the great loves of my literary life, I first discovered him after reading through all the works of Herman Hesse in seventh grade, in whom I found resonance with the Taoist poetry and Zen riddles which were among my subjects of formal study, then abandoning fiction after the nightmare of Kawabata’s House of the Sleeping Beauties and its implied erotic horror, which I had chosen after reading his stunning novel of my favorite game after chess, The Master of Go, and turned thereafter to Plato whom I adored, and read voraciously all his works throughout my eighth grade year. The Trial of Socrates founded our civilization as a self-questioning system of being human together, and in the dialectics of Socratic method offered me tools of self-construal and reinvention which became central to my identity.
My father, who was a theatre director as well as my English, Drama, and Forensics teacher, Debate Team coach, and my Fencing Club coach throughout high school, and who taught me fencing and chess from the age of nine, suggested I might like the discussion of the Apollonian and the Dionysian in Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy; Nietzsche’s vision of civilization as a struggle between passion and reason, chaos and order, conserving and revolutionary forces, which interlinks with that of Kawabata and of Herman Hesse in The Glass Bead Game to form a unitary vision of a process of becoming human, and informs my reading of literature, politics, and all human activity, to this day.
So it was that during the summer of my fourteenth year before I began high school I discovered with unforgettable joy and recognition a book written by someone who spoke for me, Thus Spake Zarathustra. Wedded in my imagination to the context of my encounter with his work was the grand adventure and disruptive trauma of my first solo foreign travel, to Brazil to train for the Pan American Games with fellow fencers.
Let me place this in context; Brazil was my first solo foreign travel experience, flying to Sao Paulo when I was fourteen to train with a group of fencers for the Pan American Games which were planned to be held there; I was the San Francisco Bay Area champion in saber and foil in my age division. I had some newly learned conversational Portuguese, an invitation to stay at the home of a boy I knew from the fencing tournament circuit with whom I could discover the local mischief, and visions of beach parties.
So it was that I entered a world of courtly manners and white-gloved servants, gracious and brilliant hosts who were local luminaries and threw a magnificent formal ball to introduce me, and a friend with whom I shared a mad passion for martial arts and sports, but also a world of high walls and armed guards.
My first view beyond this illusion came with the sounds of rifle fire from the guards; when I looked from my balcony to see who was attacking the front gate I discovered the guards were firing into a crowd of beggars, mostly children, who had mobbed a truck carrying the weekly food supplies. That day I made my first secret excursion beyond the walls.
Remembering this Defining Moment now, the day I looked beyond my limits and transgressed the boundaries of the Forbidden to discover and question the basis of my own privilege and reach across divisions of authorized identities of class and race in solidarity with those who do the hard and dirty work for the rest of us and create our wealth, to whom we have exported the true costs of production and excluded from its benefits as our de facto slaves, what fixes my imagination is that I lived an allegory of awakening which recapitulates the story of the Buddha and has become a world myth as the Prince in the Golden Cage. I had no charioteer to answer my questions and create order and meaning from my trauma of witness; I had a whole tribe of them, the Matadors. We’ll get to that part shortly.
What truths are hidden by the walls of our palaces, beyond which it is Forbidden to look? It is easy to believe the lies of authority when one is a member of the elite in whose interest they claim to wield power, and to fail to question one’s own motives and position of privilege. Terrifyingly easy to believe lies when we are the beneficiaries of hierarchies of exclusionary otherness, of wealth and power disparity and inequalities systemically manufactured and weaponized in service to power, and of genocide, slavery, conquest, and imperialism.
Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain. For there is no just authority, and as Dorothy says in the Wizard of Oz, he’s “just an old humbug”, and his lies and illusions, force and control, serve no interests but his own.
Being a naïve American boy, I felt it was my duty to report the incident; but at the police station I had difficulty making myself understood. They thought I was there to place a bet on my guard in an ongoing monthly contest for which police officer bagged the most street children; there was a chalkboard on the station wall for this, and a jar of tagged ears. Another betting game called “the Big One”, was for which policeman kicked the most pregnant girls in the stomach and ranked among the top ten causes of death in Brazil for teenage girls, invariably living within slum zones containing the most impoverished and most Black of citizens; this in a city founded by escaped African slaves as a free republic.
I learned much in the weeks that followed; that fully ten percent of Brazilians were abandoned and orphaned street children on whom bounties had been placed as a solution, that a quarter of the population lived in shantytowns, that life expectancy for 80% of the people was 35 years, that 350,000 children died before the age of five each year and only 13% finished primary school, that nearly half the people were illiterate.
And yet it was a rich nation; the Brazilian gold boom of the 1700’s created Europe’s industrial revolution, and at this same time of pervasive and systemic poverty and racism Brazil was the worlds number one coffee, sugar, orange, and gasohol producer, #2 cocoa, and #3 timber and beef producer. But over half of the wealth was owned by less than two percent of its people, like the family who were my gracious hosts.
Above all I learned who is responsible for these inequalities; we are, if we buy the products of an unjust system, remain silent as witnesses of history to injustices, or abandon our duty of care toward others when evil unfolds before us and by a mission of action we may safeguard others from harm. This is the true mission of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege; to disrupt our interdependence and the solidarity of our universal brotherhood as a precondition of unequal power.
During the nights of my adventures beyond the walls and actions to help the bands of child beggars and obstruct the police bounty hunts I had a second near death experience, this time similar though not as formal as those of Maurice Blanchot’s mock execution by the Nazis in 1944 and Fyodor Dostoevsky’s by the Czar’s secret police in 1849; fleeing pursuit through a warren of tunnels with an injured child among others and trapped in the open by two police riflemen who took flanking positions and aimed at us while the leader called for surrender beyond the curve of a tunnel. I stood in front of a boy with a twisted leg who could not run while the others scattered and escaped or found hiding places, and refused to stand aside when ordered to do so. This was my Ring of Fire and the first of more Last Stands than I can now clearly remember, and I find hope for us all in the instinctive duty of care of the young boy I once was to whom it never occurred to run, to surrender, or to abandon a stranger to harm, and like Wagner’s great hero Siegfried chose instead the fire.
With all of the horrors I have witnessed in a life lived in the unknown spaces of our maps of becoming human marked Here Be Dragons, beyond the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden, through wars and revolutions as a maker of mischief for tyrants and a monster who hunts other monsters for the chance to salvage something of our humanity, though in this I often fail as I did this spring in Mariupol and last year in Afghanistan, regardless of the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, something in us refuses to submit to the abjection and learned helplessness of authoritarian systems and reaches toward exaltation and freedom. Whether such hope is a gift or a curse remains for each of us to discover in how we live our lives.
In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.
Siegfried walks through the fire and becomes human. There’s a good retelling of it in Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s musical episode, Once More With Feeling.
When the disembodied voice of my executioner reached out from the darkness of the purgatorial labyrinth in which we were trapped to order my surrender, with the life of a stranger in the balance, I asked how much to let us walk away, and he ordered his men to fire. But there was only one shot instead of a demonstration of crossfire, and that a wide miss; he had time to ask “What?” before falling to the ground.
And then our rescuers revealed themselves, having crept up on the police from behind; the Matadors, who might be described as vigilantes, a criminal gang, a revolutionary group, or all three, founded by Brazil’s notorious vigilante and criminal Pedro Rodrigues Filho, who had been arrested the previous year. Into this fearsome brotherhood I was welcomed, and in the streets of Sao Paulo that summer I never again stood alone.
From the moment I saw the guards of the aristocratic family with whom I was a guest firing on the crowd of homeless children and beggars swarming the food supply truck at the manor gate, naked and skeletal in starvation, scarred and crippled and misshapen with diseases unknown to any people for whom healthcare and basic nutrition are free and guaranteed preconditions of the universal right to life, desperate for a handful of food which could mean one more day of survival; in that moment I chose my side, and my people are the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.
As one of my rescuers phrased it; “Come with us. You are one of us. We can’t save everyone, but we can avenge.”
May we all be granted the gift of vision of our interdependence and the universality of our humanity, and wounds which open us to the pain of others.
Throughout all of this, Nietzsche’s great song of liberation pulled me into its heart and ignited in me a will and vision to transgress beyond our boundaries into the unknown places marked Here Be Dragons.
I thereafter read all his works, though Thus Spake Zarathustra remained a kind of sacred text to me; I used to quote it in refutation to my fellow students who quoted the Bible to me as an instrument of subjugation to authority.
Redolent with the cadences of poetic oratory and a phraseology which echoes that of the beautiful King James Bible, pervasive in my town of Reformed Church stalwarts whose mouths were full of thee’s and thou’s, it was both familiar and utterly strange, an empowering work of liberation proclaiming the death of Authority and the limits of the Forbidden. How I cherished it, this treasure and marvel; by summer’s end I could recite it entirely by memory so many times had I read it.
May we all find such books, which illuminate our imagination and offer to us the Promethean fire.
Read therefore the immortal classics of Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra, The Birth of Tragedy, The Gay Science, Beyond Good and Evil, On the Geneology of Morality, The Case of Wagner, The AntiChrist, Twilight of the Gods, and Ecce Homo.
American Nietzsche: A History of an Icon and his Ideas, by Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen provides an insightful overview.
Maurice Blanchot’s lifelong engagement with Nietzsche can be illuminating and wonderful; The Step Not Beyond, a reply to Klossowski’s Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle which references Deleuze, The Writing of the Disaster, and The Infinite Conversation all center on his reinterpretation of Nietzsche’s Eternal Return as an Existentialist principle in which the negation of presence is a path of total freedom. In the pivotal 1945 essay On Nietzsche’s Side, Blanchot reimagines Karl Jaspers’ seminal thesis on Nietzsche; thereafter his works interrogate Nietzschean themes including the Will to Power, the nature of time, ecstatic vision and the Dionysian principle, the Death of God as symbol and metaphor of the emptiness of tyranny and the illusion of authority, and the relativity of meaning and value.
A student of the philosopher Henri Bergson, Nikos Kazantzakis’ thesis “Friedrich Nietzsche on the Philosophy of Right and the State” interrogates the reimagined doctrine of Original Sin as the innate Depravity of Man, which is the basis of all our law and an apologetics of authoritarian power which both Nietzsche and Kazantzakis made a life mission of overthrowing, a theme which continued to inform Kazantzakis throughout his life and is central to understanding his unique brand of Existentialism. In large part his works explore the implications of the Nietzschean conflict between the Apollonian and the Dionysian as personal and social struggle.
Do read also C.G. Jung’s work Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, notes from the 86 seminars he chaired over 11 university terms exploring the great epic poem which seized and shook me awake. An engagement with Thus Spake Zarathustra as a counter-gospel and Zarathustra as a figure of Liberation like Milton’s rebel angel, as for both Jung and myself, will lead you as it did me to the works of William Blake and his rebel figure Los; Milton, Nietzsche, and Blake form a line of transmission which unfolds gloriously in Jung’s Red Book.
Last of all I must cite the influence which prefigured and later reinterpreted the meaning of Nietzsche for me, the great storyteller of my childhood William S. Burroughs, whose own ideology was shaped by his friend Georges Bataille’s cult of Nietzsche. Bataille’s On Nietzsche brilliantly interrogates the problem of the Deus Absconditus, the god who bound us to his laws and abandoned us to free ourselves from them, in a fearless reimagination of the will to power as a will to transgress. The Sacred Conspiracy: The Internal Papers of the Secret Society of Acéphale and Lectures to the College of Sociology, compiles the secret documents of his occult circle, disciples of Nietzsche who attempted to reimagine civilization and whose ritual transgressions echo de Sade and Jean Genet.
The influence of Bataille on William S. Burroughs cannot be overstated. Burroughs derived his Anarchist Trilogy, The Wild Boys, The Cat Inside, and the Revised Boy Scout Manual, from Bataille’s synthesis of Nietzsche, de Sade, and Freud, though its central premise, The Algebra of Need, references Marx.
This is the Burroughs with whom I found connection as a teenager; the anarchist philosopher for whom the Wolfman was a figure of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves, whose novel on the subject, The Wild Boys, was written during the period of his visits at our home and possibly influenced by my father’s tales of our family history.
For Burroughs, writing was conjuration; an act of chaos magic and liberation struggle in which the tyranny of authorized identities and orders of human being, meaning, and value can be destabilized as fracture, disruption, and delegitimation, and created anew through poetic vision.
In this mission William S. Burroughs was the successor and reinterpreter of of Bataille and of their shared model Nietzsche, as ritual transgression, the delegitimation of authority and seizures of power as liberation struggle, poetic vision and ecstatic trance as the reimagination and transformation of our limitless possibilities of becoming human.
Burroughs also believed himself to be the literal successor of Nietzsche as the possessed avatar of a chthonic underworld god, a Shadow figure in Jungian terms which represents his animal nature and inchoate desires as a beast with a beast’s soul, unconquerable and free, in reference to the Toad Nietzsche feared he must swallow and that Burroughs’ nanny had cursed him with as a child. A powerful guardian spirit and otherworld guide to be offered, as was I in reciting together the line with which Burrough’s often ended his bizarre versions of Grimm’s fairytales, a line written by Shakespeare in The Tempest for Prospero, who says of Caliban; “This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine.”
So the circle of meaning returns to swallow its own tail like an Ouroboros or an infinite Mobius Loop in the embrace of our darkness as the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves, of truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh, and of the balance we must find for the terror of our nothingness in the joy of total freedom in a universe without imposed meaning, wherein the only being, meaning, and value that exists are those we create for ourselves, even if we must seize them from those who would enslave us.
Walk Through the Fire, song from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, episode Once More With Feeling
Friedrich Nietzsche, a reading list
Nietzsche in Turin: An Intimate Biography, by Lesley Chamberlain
Friedrich Nietzsche, zu seinem Geburtstag 15.10.2022 Revision
Nietzsche, der erwacht, Nietzsche, der herausfordert, Nietzsche, der erleuchtet und inspiriert; das sind die drei Nietzsches, die meine Lebensgefährten waren, meine Führer und Musen, und die ich Ihnen als Lied des Orpheus und Ariadne-Faden anbiete, um Ihren Weg durch das Labyrinth des Lebens zu finden.
Veränderlich in seinen Formen, kann er jede Form annehmen, die für Ihre Suche benötigt wird; und wird seine Rollen in den verschiedenen Phasen der Reise so spielen, wie es sich gehört. Es gibt viele Nietzsches, die wie eine endlose Reihe tanzender Schrödinger-Katzen Möglichkeiten bieten, die die seiner Leser als Tintenkleckstest widerspiegeln und widerspiegeln. Wer ist Nietzsche für mich?
Wie keine andere prägende, motivierende und informierende Quelle nimmt Friedrich Nietzsche einen Platz in meinem Leben und meiner Vorstellungskraft ein, weil meine Entdeckung im Jahr vor meinem Abitur erstmals die große Kette des Seins durchbrochen hat, die mich an den Willen der Autorität gebunden hat und die Vorstellungen meiner Mitschüler von Tugend, Wahrheit und Schönheit in einer theokratischen, patriarchalischen und rassistischen Gesellschaft, die mit dem Apartheidregime in Südafrika in Einklang steht, und die mir die Freiheit gegeben haben, mich in einem Universum ohne auferlegte Bedeutung oder Wert zu erschaffen; hat mir dann geholfen, ein primäres Trauma zu verarbeiten, das zu einem entscheidenden Moment wurde, als ich mich dem Befreiungskampf eines fremden Landes anschloss, dessen glitzernde Zitadellen der Pracht schreckliche Wahrheiten verbargen.
Nietzsche war es, der mir half, den Schrecken unseres Nichts mit der Freude der totalen Freiheit in Einklang zu bringen.
Wenn ich von der Durchsetzung der Normalität als einem Übel spreche, gegen das man sich wehren muss, dann mit der Stimme der alten Frau, die in ihrem Haus als Hexe von einem Mob lebendig verbrannt wurde, zu dem auch andere Kinder gehörten, mit denen ich aufgewachsen bin. Um Nietzsche vollständig zu verstehen, müssen Sie den historischen Raum der Befreiung von der systemischen Tyrannei bewohnen, den sein antiautoritärer Bildersturm darstellt.
Ich bin in einer solchen Welt aufgewachsen, einer vormodernen Welt, die an die Gesetze einer grausamen und unerbittlichen Autorität aus fremden und unergründlichen Motiven und jenen gebunden ist, die uns versklaven und behaupten würden, in seinem Namen als Tyrannei der Auserwählten zu sprechen, deren Hegemonien des Reichtums , Macht und Privilegien stützen sich auf unsere Kommodifizierung als bewaffnete Disparität und Diebstahl der Gemeingüter, Fälschung durch Lügen und Illusionen, Unterwerfung durch erlernte Hilflosigkeit und Spaltung des ausschließenden Andersseins, Angst als Instrument der Machtzentralisierung durch gefängnisbedingte Macht- und Kontrollstaaten durch Faschismen des Blutes, des Glaubens und des Bodens und durch Glauben, der im Dienst an der Macht als Diebstahl der Seele bewaffnet wird.
Solche Atavismen der Barbarei beherrschen immer noch einen Großteil der Menschheit und besitzen uns als Vermächtnis unserer Geschichte, gebunden durch eingebettete Tyranneien vieler Art, einer Welt, die Amerika als eine freie Gesellschaft von Gleichen ersetzen sollte. Unsere Zivilisation ist sehr zerbrechlich, ständig bedroht von Abgründen der Dunkelheit, die uns umgeben, und von unerbittlichen, allgegenwärtigen und systemischen Feinden in faschistischer Tyrannei, patriarchalischem Sexualterror, weißem rassistischem Terror, dem Fetischismus des Todes und der Gewalt im identitären Nationalismus und seinen Polizeistaaten und imperialer Militarismus und Entmenschlichung. Dem müssen wir widerstehen, und ich lese Also sprach Zarathustra als ein leuchtendes Widerstandslied.
Unter den großen Lieben meines literarischen Lebens entdeckte ich ihn zuerst, nachdem ich in der siebten Klasse alle Werke von Herman Hesse gelesen hatte, in dem ich eine Resonanz mit der taoistischen Poesie und den Zen-Rätseln fand, die zu meinen formalen Studienfächern gehörten, und dann die Fiktion aufgab nach dem Albtraum von Kawabatas Haus der schlafenden Schönheiten und seinem impliziten erotischen Horror, den ich ausgewählt hatte, nachdem ich seinen atemberaubenden Roman über mein Lieblingsspiel nach dem Schach, The Master of Go, gelesen hatte, und mich danach Platon zuwandte, den ich verehrte, und alles gierig las seine Werke während meines achten Schuljahres. Der Prozess des Sokrates begründete unsere Zivilisation als ein sich selbst hinterfragendes System des gemeinsamen Menschseins und bot mir in der Dialektik der sokratischen Methode Werkzeuge der Selbstkonstruktion und Neuerfindung, die für meine Identität zentral wurden.
Mein Vater, der Theaterregisseur, mein Englisch-, Schauspiel- und Forensiklehrer, Trainer des Debattierteams und Trainer meines Fechtklubs während der gesamten High School war und mir seit meinem neunten Lebensjahr Fechten und Schach beibrachte, schlug vor, dass ich vielleicht gefallen könnte die Diskussion des Apollinischen und des Dionysischen in Friedrich Nietzsches Die Geburt der Tragödie; Nietzsches Vision von Zivilisation als Kampf zwischen Leidenschaft und Vernunft, Chaos und Ordnung, bewahrenden und revolutionären Kräften, die sich mit der von Kawabata und Herman Hesse in Das Glasperlenspiel zu einer einheitlichen Vision eines Menschwerdungsprozesses verzahnt und informiert meine Lektüre von Literatur, Politik und allen menschlichen Aktivitäten bis heute.
So entdeckte ich im Sommer meines vierzehnten Jahres vor dem Abitur mit unvergeßlicher Freude und Anerkennung ein Buch, geschrieben von einem, der für mich sprach, Also sprach Zarathustra. In meiner Vorstellung mit dem Kontext meiner Begegnung mit seiner Arbeit verbunden war das große Abenteuer und das zerstörerische Trauma meiner ersten alleinigen Auslandsreise nach Brasilien, um mit anderen Fechtern für die Panamerikanischen Spiele zu trainieren.
We remember the valor and sacrifice of our sacred dead on this Memorial
Day, of those killed in action and all those who served in defense of our liberty and equality and in solidarity with that of others against the malign forces of racism and fascism, tyranny and terror, from the beginning of our day of recognition of the Union soldiers and Abolitionists who died in the Civil War fighting a human trafficking syndicate which had declared itself a nation answerable to no civilized law, and since its proclamation as a national holiday all those who died in our endless and terrible wars including the First and Second World Wars and thereafter to free the world of fascist imperialism, terror, and the darkness of organized violence, and all others who have died to achieve the dream of a free society of equals, whether in uniform or not, on the battlefields of civilizational conflicts or as victims of white supremacist terror, at Gettysburg 1863, Normandy 1944, Charlottesville 2017, the January 6 Insurrection 2021, Ukraine and Palestine ongoing now, and countless others.
In America and throughout the world, Confederate-Nazi revivalism and fascist tyranny once again emerges from the darkness to subjugate us, and this we must resist.
There is an iconic conversation between George Washington, about to be hanged, and Mick Rory who has come from the future to rescue him in Legends of Tomorrow, Season Two Episode 11 Turncoat; and in this historical moment wherein the fate of democracy and humankind hang in the balance, I answer now with the words of Mick, no one’s idea of a hero or even of a good man but my idea of a man like myself, of being an American as national identity, and of becoming human as a path of resistance to tyranny, seizure of power and freedom, and revolutionary struggle.
“ Washington: I’ve been a soldier since I was twenty years old. But our cause is the cause of all men. To be treated equally, regardless of hereditary privilege. We must prove to the world that you don’t need a title to be a gentleman. The British may be dishonorable, but I am not. By my death, I will prove to the Crown what it means to be an American.
Mick: You don’t know the first thing about being an American. We’re misfits. Outcasts. And we’re proud of it. If they attack in formation, we pop ’em off from the trees. If they challenge you to a duel, you raid their camp at night. And if they’re gonna hang you, then you fight dirty. And you never, ever, give up. That’s the American way.”
We live now in such a time of decision, in which tyranny and liberty play for the fate of humankind.
World War Three began its European theatre of operations with the conquest of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, much as the Second World War began with fascist conquests of Spain and Manchuria, and broadened with general invasion of Ukraine last year, as a development of the conflict between Turkey and Russia for imperial dominion of the Middle East and the Mediterranean with the Russian intervention in Syria and Libya in 2015 and in the Nagorno-Karabakh Civil War of 2020; Russia also began a campaign of colonialism in sub-Saharan Africa in 2016, operates Sudan and Belarus as client states, and invaded Kazakhstan to support a proxy tyrant with brutal repression during the revolt of January 2022. Here in America of course Russia’s star agent, Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, captured the state as its President during the Stolen Election of 2016, and began systematically attacking the values, ideals, systems, structures, and institutions of democracy.
We are winning in that we have exposed our enemies for what they are and delegitimized them, but the fight is not yet won, not in Ukraine and not in America.
Twenty four centuries ago Pericles of Athens said of the heroes of democracy; “Not only are they commemorated by columns and inscriptions, but there dwells also an unwritten memorial of them, graven not on stone but in the hearts of men.”
On this Memorial Day let us cherish and exalt the gift of liberty given to us by our fellows, elders, and ancestors, and by all those throughout history who have answered those who would enslave us with defiance and resistance.
Such is our legacy as a Band of Brothers, sisters, and others united by our refusal to submit to force and control, in our struggle for one another as Antifascists and antiracists, and as Americans but also as human beings who hold the universality of our condition above any divisions of otherness, and perform our uniqueness within the limitless diversity of our community of humankind.
As such it remains among our highest principles that we accord others those universal rights which we claim for ourselves, that each of us must possess the right to imagine and become human as a free choice in a community of autonomous individuals, and that we are committed to our common defense of those rights of ownership of identity, freedom of conscience in our faith, and of bodily autonomy which define what is human.
America was founded as an anti-theocratic, anti-imperialist, and anti-colonialist revolutionary experiment in forging a society free of the conceit of aristocratic feudalism that some of us are by nature better than others, and to redress injustices perpetrated against the many by the few.
While in the course of revolutionary struggle and the resistance to tyranny we may find just cause for action in our defense or the defense of others, there is never any justification for wars of imperialist aggression nor to secure strategic resources such as oil or any economic colonialist thievery, nor for wars of dominion or the conquest and assimilation of cultures different from our own. Different is neither better nor worse, merely an opportunity to learn new ways of being human together that we might become better than we were alone.
Let us send no armies to enforce virtue, but to liberate as a guarantor of our universal human rights and the principles of democracy as a free society of equals; freedom, equality, truth, and justice.
We now face near certain odds of six to eight centuries of total global war and nationalist tyranny, an age of civilizational collapse ending with the extinction of humankind. I calculate the chances of human survival among our possible futures as great as twelve and as few as two in one hundred, as of now, and we are on a countdown to a point of no return. Every moment of delay, appeasement, bargaining with our head in the lion’s mouth of the Fourth Reich, and failure to purge our destroyers from among us brings us nearer our doom.
What does our future look like? To this end I have assembled here my references in iconic films of war, with a word of caution; the wars of the Age of Terror and Tyranny will be fought with weapons unimaginable to us now and incomparably destructive as measured against those of the Second World War.
In America we have tracked and brought to justice the deniable assets of the Republican Party and the criminal and treasonous Trump regime in the January 6 Insurrection, but not its high command, nor its conspirators in Congress, nor its propagandists, nor the plutocrats and elites who fund and benefit from it all. Our institutions of Law have failed us, captured or subverted by the enemy as is the Supreme Court, and we must look beyond the law for a Reckoning and our survival.
Law serves power, order appropriates, and there is no just authority.
In Ukraine the free world hesitates to confront a Russian empire which uses terror, genocide, and threat of nuclear annihilation in its mad conquest, while in America, Europe, and throughout the world the guarantors of democracy are being destabilized and captured by fascist tyrannies. Here appeasement works as well as it did for Chamberlain in World War One, which is not at all, and when someone tells you as did Hitler in 1938 “This is my last territorial demand”, he who trusts the lie is about to become extinct. The first rule of Resistance is: everything the enemy says is a lie. Ukraine is a test of our solidarity and will, and like the 1939 invasion of Poland a gate to the conquest of Europe, and as in Gaza and the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians paid for by our taxes and granted permission by American complicity, a line from which there can be no retreat, if we are to salvage something of our humanity from the darkness.
To quote the lines of Winston Churchill in the magnificent film Darkest Hour, which the historical figure never said; “You cannot reason with a Tiger when your head is in its mouth.”
References
Churchill’s speech in Darkest Hour: You Cannot Reason With a Tiger When Your Head Is In Its Mouth
DC’s Legends of Tomorrow “Turncoat” Season 2 Episode 11
Our future, as echoes and reflections of the past:
How shall we see and understand images of war, death, pain, horror, and evil such as those of war films, which both glorify and authorize violence and the use of social force in the manufacture of virtue and national identity, and interrogate, subvert, and liberate us from such systems of control as stories which possess us and from which we must emerge?
How can we give answer to such darkness in our own lives?
The Second World War: A Complete History, Martin Gilbert
The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War, Andrew Roberts
The Battle of Britain: Five Months That Changed History, May-October 1940, Fortress Malta: An Island Under Siege 1940-43, Together We Stand: Turning the Tide in the West: North Africa, 1942-1943, Sicily ’43: The First Assault on Fortress Europe, Burma ’44: The Battle That Turned Britain’s War in the East, Normandy ’44: D-Day and the Epic 77-Day Battle for France, James Holland
Britain and Churchill
The Splendid and the Vile: A Saga of Churchill, Family, and Defiance During the Blitz, Erik Larson
Churchill: Walking with Destiny, Andrew Roberts
Churchill’s Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler’s Defeat, Giles Milton
The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill: Defender of the Realm, 1940-1965, William Manchester, Paul Reid
France
The Fall of France: The Nazi Invasion of 1940, France: The Dark Years 1940-1944, A Certain Idea of France: The Life of Charles de Gaulle, Julian T. Jackson
Paris at War: 1939-1944, David Drake
The Resistance: The French Fight Against the Nazis, Matthew Cobb
Outwitting the Gestapo, Lucie Aubrac
The Saboteur: The Aristocrat Who Became France’s Most Daring Anti-Nazi Commando, Paul Kix
Madame Fourcade’s Secret War: The Daring Young Woman Who Led France’s Largest Spy Network Against Hitler, Lynne Olson
The Liberation of Paris: How Eisenhower, de Gaulle, and von Choltitz Saved the City of Light, Jean Edward Smith
Italy
Mussolini Warlord: Failed Dreams of Empire, 1940-1943, H. James Burgwyn
The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944, Rick Atkinson
Bitter Victory: The Battle For Sicily, July August 1943, Carlo D’Este
Monte Cassino: Ten Armies in Hell, Peter Caddick-Adams
Anzio: Italy and the Battle for Rome 1944, Lloyd Clark
Naples ’44: A World War II Diary of Occupied Italy, Norman Lewis
Spain
Picasso’s War, Russell Martin
Homage to Catalonia, George Orwell
The Spanish Civil War, Hugh Thomas
The International Brigades: Fascism, Freedom and the Spanish Civil War, Giles Tremlett
Russia
Russia’s War: A History of the Soviet Effort: 1941-1945, Richard Overy
Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege, 1942–1943, Antony Beevor
Jewish Peoples
Night, Elie Wiesel
Witness: Lessons from Elie Wiesel’s Classroom, Ariel Burger
Maus: A Survivor’s Tale, Art Spiegelman
Survival in Auschwitz, Primo Levi
Primo Levi’s Resistance: Rebels and Collaborators in Occupied Italy, Sergio Luzzatto
The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness, Every Day Remembrance Day: A Chronicle of Jewish Martyrdom, The Murderers Among Us, Krystyna: The Tragedy of the Polish Resistance, Simon Wiesenthal
Flags Over the Warsaw Ghetto: The Untold Story of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, Moshe Arens
Auschwitz, Laurence Rees
Treblinka, Jean-François Steiner, Simone de Beauvoir (Preface), Terrence Des Pres (Introduction
The Origins of Totalitarianism, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arendt, Julia Kristeva
America and the Second World War in the Pacific
But Not in Shame: The Six Months After Pearl Harbor, The Rising Sun: The Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1936-1945, John Toland
Storm Clouds over the Pacific, 1931–41, Japan Runs Wild, 1942–1943, Asian Armageddon, 1944–45, Nanjing 1937: Battle for a Doomed City, Shanghai 1937: Stalingrad on the Yangtze, Peter Harmsen
The Eagle & the Rising Sun: The Japanese-American War 1941-43: Pearl Harbor through Guadalcanal, Alan Schom
Tomorrow is Memorial Day in America, a Rashomon Gate of relative truths, multiplicities of history from which conflicting and ambiguous narratives of identity can be forged, stories we live within and inhabit and those which possess and falsify us, both those we must claim and those from which we must emerge.
This holiday codifies national identity as veneration of the sacred dead who died to win our liberty, for myself primarily a celebration of antifascist struggle in World War Two and in the ongoing theatres of World War Three in Russia, America, Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Mali and the whole of sub Saharan Arica and the region of Lake Chad, Nagorno-Karabakh, Kazakhstan, Belarus, and now Gaza and the divided nation of Israel and Palestine, and should we fail to turn the tide of the Fourth Reich and its puppetmaster Putin’s mad dreams of empire and a conflict which will engulf the whole of Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East, in which case civilization collapses and the world begins an age of tyranny and total war which humankind will not survive.
A spectre of our doom made all too real and timely as one year ago this week Putin began positioning his nuclear arsenal in Belarus for the Final Solution to the Ukrainian problem, and then Moldova and Poland, then NATO and the EU. Here is bottled death, the death of cities, nations, peoples, our species, and it calls to him like an evil genie, whispering; “Set me free, and I’ll make you powerful.”
We must stop it here, this massive failure of our humanity which is the Russian conquest of Ukraine and the Israel genocide of the Palestinians, because from this point of no retreat history collapses and we become nothing.
History, memory, identity; our symbols and holidays are a ground of struggle, which open and close doors to possible futures.
Who do we want to become, we humans? This is the question which drives and organizes our interrogations of the past and the future possibilities of human being, meaning, and value; not our addiction to power and wealth which the family storyteller of my youth William S. Burroughs called the Algebra of Need in his reimagination of Marx nor the processes of dehumanization of capitalism, imperialism, and carceral states of force and control which my friend Jean Genet described as necrophilia in his famous 1970 May Day speech at Yale in support of the Black Panther Party. These too are crucial to understanding why we are rushing blindly to our extinction, as we are falsified, commodified, and dehumanized by the Wagnerian Ring of fear, force, and power.
In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.
Such questions illuminate the interdependence of our social and material systems, and the bidirectionality of forces of action and reaction. For our politics reflects and echoes our relationship not only with ourselves and each other, but with nature itself; our fear or embrace of the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves.
As I wrote in my post of September 7 2019, As the Amazon Dies in a Bonfire of Our Vanities, a Final Message From Its Indigenous Peoples; Vast tracts of priceless and irreplaceable resources are now burning to clear the land for cattle and palm oil monoculture, in the Amazon and Borneo, and so many other sacred places of the earth, its beautiful wildness and glorious marvels sacrificed to profit and greed.
Jean Genet was right to call capitalism a kind of necrophilia; capitalism is a pimp at a bus station, an ambush predator waiting to cut the vulnerable out of the herd and convert beauty into profit, life into dead money. And what is money but a belief system, the promise to pay of a government and its value nothing more than the faith of those who trade with it in the reliability of that promise?
It is insubstantial as the wind, its value shifting with the confidence of those who use it, while real things, a leopard, a hornbill, an orchid, a tribal people living in harmony with nature, have intrinsic value which relies on nothing beyond themselves.
Which kind of things shall we value and preserve, the illusionary or the real, the impermanent or the eternal, the living, transcendent, and ineffable or the dead, meaningless, and profitable?
As I wrote in my post of August 1 2022, Politics Is About Fear as the Basis of Human Exchange, the Origins of Evil In the Wagnerian Ring of Fear, Power, and Force, and the State As Embodied Violence, and Revolution is the Art of Freeing Ourselves From It; A friend whom I regard as wise has asked me the question which redeems the Fisher King in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight; are you all right?
Such questions become a moral compass which can reorient us when we are lost among the unknowns and nameless places of our topologies of human being, meaning, and value, for the bearers of questions as truthtellers perform the functions of the Just Humans in Jewish mythology who maintain the world and actualize its ongoing regeneration, an idea which references Maimonides’ principle of continual creation, that the universe is destroyed and recreated with each moment and must be remembered and renewed through tikkun olam or repair of the world lest we be consumed by the darkness of grief and despair, the loneliness of our modern pathology of disconnectedness, the guilt of survivorship, and our helplessness and meaninglessness before the unanswerable tidal forces of death.
Here is my reply; As the line in Hamlet goes, “The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to” remain with us always as an imposed condition of struggle; yet I shall resist and yield not, and abandon not my fellows in their hour of need, as I was sworn to do by Jean Genet, nor shall I go quietly into the night which beckons, but rage against the dying of the light, of the fall of civilization, and of the negation of our humanity.
It gladdens me to hear that you are well in the wholeness of your soul; I am not, for in Mariupol the darkness began to look back at me as Nietzsche warned us.
There I tried to claw back something of our humanity from the darkness, and failed. But as the Matadors said to me in Brazil the summer before high school when they welcomed me into their society, “We can’t save everyone, but we can avenge.”
The question for me now is whether this is enough to tip the scales of history toward democracy and away from fascism and tyranny, enough to salvage some fragment of my humanity as a balance against degeneration, to remain a man and not become a monster and a beast.
As with our myriad futures and limitless possibilities of becoming human, we begin the journey of each new day toward the discovery of ourselves, a grand and fearsome thing which requires the transgression of boundaries and the testing of unknowns. And so hope remains for us all, for the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.
Be well, my friend, and never let our duty of the repair of the world become a task of abjection and despair, for it is a labor of Sisyphus shared by all humankind.
Thank you for your question, Professor Levine. I am not okay, and neither is America nor humankind okay; but one day, if we keep asking questions, we will be.
As I wrote in my post of August 1 2021, Freedom and Revolution as an Art of Fear and Pain: “A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free,” so John Stuart Mill exhorts us in Principles of Political Economy, and I am thinking of this in terms of the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle and the primary strategic problem of how to delegitimize authority and demonstrate the meaninglessness of its power, how to seize power against impossible odds and in the face of twin threats of force and control, the brutal repression and massive military resources of state tyranny and terror and the pervasive surveillance and thought control of propaganda, lies and illusions which falsify us and steal our souls.
My father once said to me; ‘Never play someone else’s game. Whoever sets the terms and the rules of a game wins, so this is what you must seize first, and change the rules.” This wisdom was imparted as an observation of the differences between sports of personal combat, which have rules, and combat in war and revolution or anywhere beyond the boundaries of law or games with rules, which has none. In this it is like the distinction between politics and revolutionary struggle.
The Olympics playing out before us now offer us spectacles of excellence and the limits of human achievement, and I have been watching the fencing competition with great interest as performances which enact metaphors and tactical principles of struggle, a background against which a great theatre of shadow puppets is unfolding here in Brazil where mobilization for the re-election of Lula to the Presidency is coordinated with mass actions of the precariat underclass and workers unions, the resistance of indigenous peoples to genocide, and direct action against the institutions of state terror and tyranny.
As my father was a fencing coach, whose right arm was magnificently adorned with scars from actual sword duels, who taught both privately at our home and as a club at our high school where he also taught Forensics, English, and Drama, it was inevitable that I would have participated to some degree, but I loved saber and was reasonably good at it. How I came to discover this, and what it came to mean to me in time, is a story relevant to my understanding of freedom and the art of revolution as its praxis.
It was the Incident of the Bubble Gum which brought the disciplines of fencing and martial arts into my life, and changed how I was raised and who I became as a scholar and warrior.
As a nine year old I spent recess at elementary school either playing chess with the Principal in his office, reading in the library, or experimenting with the chemistry set in the lab, which doubtless seemed unfriendly and aloof to the other children whom I failed to play with. Someone retaliated by putting gum on my seat, which I found insulting, so during the next recess I poured some chemicals in bottles marked with a skull and crossbones down the spigot of the drinking faucet, reasoning that water pressure would let them pool in the u-tube just below so that everyone who went for a drink of water after playing would get a dose. That afternoon half a dozen kids were outside throwing up, and I felt not triumph but horror, because I realized I could have unintentionally killed everyone. I told my father about it that night.
To this my father replied; “You have discovered politics; this is about fear and power as the basis of human exchange and relationships. Most importantly, it is about the use of force.
Fear is a good servant and a terrible master; those who use it to subjugate others are motivated by fear themselves, and if you can show them you do not fear them they will be afraid of you, and you can use it as a lever to win dominance. Fear is a ground of struggle. Fear precedes power. So, whose instrument will it be?
Fear, power, and the use of social force are balanced with the need to belong. Membership, too, is a means of exchange. Sometimes its best to do what others do to fit in, but it isn’t always best, and it can be very wrong.
Best is to discover what’s best for you, no matter how different that is, and find belonging on your own terms and no one else’s. Even if you have to create that community yourself.
What you need now is a way to confront people directly when you’re upset with them that doesn’t cause more harm than it solves.”
So my father described to me Sartrean authenticity and freedom as an escape from the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force as a philosophy of total Resistance.
From this time I was engaged in the study of martial arts, fencing, and wilderness survival. Martial arts is a vast subject, and I trained in a number of fighting arts, but competitive saber fencing is a game with a very specific set of conditions which are directly relevant to actual combat, because like politics and war it is an Art of Pain and Fear.
Politics and how we choose to be human together, and the arts of revolution and war as seizures of power when we can no longer hear and speak to one another’s pain and dialog and negotiation finds its limit; these are arts of swallowing pain and metabolizing it as power and freedom.
To be clear, these are arts of power as intimidation, subjugation, and dominion through inflicting pain, and freedom won through discipline in embracing it. A fencing saber is a semi flexible steel whip with which we inflict pain to establish dominance; fencers run at each other and deliver punishing hits that feel like real cuts, a white hot searing pain so intense it can disrupt consciousness.
On the first pass I preferred trading hits or counterattack to any defense; why defend and be reactive and controlled when you can teach your enemy to fear you? On the second pass a weak opponent will hesitate, betrayed by his flesh and the fear of remembered pain it holds, and be lost. If he is without fear we meet as equals in the second and third engagements, and the game becomes one of chesslike multilayered strategies, diversion and surprise, timing, precision, and control through continuous assault and patterns of attack and entrapment which set up multi-staged openings by making the opponent react in defense to establish habits and expectations of action as norms and misdirection which one then violates with an unpredictable surprise. An art of politics, war, and revolution.
I love saber because it is primarily a contest of will and only secondarily of skill, in which ferocity in attack and willingness to accept pain to achieve victory are decisive, though guile, deception, concealment of intent, and an ability to think moves ahead of one’s opponent improvisationally in a time-compressed fluid and dynamic situation define greatness in this arena.
So also with the arts of revolution as both war and political struggle.
To be beyond control by pain and fear is to be free from the limits of our form and from subjugation by authority, for who cannot be compelled becomes Unconquered. As Jean Genet said to me when we were trapped by soldiers in a burning house, moments before we expected to be burned alive having refused to come out and surrender, “When there is no hope, we are free to do impossible things, glorious things.”
To once again tell the tale of how Genet set me on my life’s path with the Oath of the Resistance in Beirut during the summer of 1982:
Israeli soldiers had set fire to the houses on my street, and called for people to come out and surrender. They were blindfolding the children of those who did and using them as human shields.
We had no other weapon than the empty bottle of champagne we had just finished with our breakfast of strawberry crepes; I asked “Any ideas?”, at which he shrugged and said with an ironic smile; “Fix bayonets?”
And then he gave me a principle of action by which I have lived for thirty nine years now; “When there is no hope, one is free to do impossible things, glorious things.”
He asked me if I was going to surrender, and I said no; he smiled and replied, “Nor will I.” And so he swore me to the Oath he devised in 1940 in Paris at the beginning of the Occupation for such friends as he could gather, reworded from the oath he had taken as a Legionnaire. He said it was the finest thing he ever stole; “We swear our loyalty to each other, to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.” So it was that I became the bearer of a tradition now over eighty years old and forged in the most fearsome and terrible conflict the world has ever known, shortly before I expected to be burned alive in the first of many Last Stands.
This was the moment of my forging, this decision to choose death and pain over subjugation, and ever since being struck by it I have been a bell, ringing. And like the Liberty Bell, I am broken open to the suffering of others and to the flaws of our humanity. This has been the greatest gift I have ever been given, this empathy borne of a sacred wound, and I shall never cease the call to liberty, nor hesitate to answer as I am able the call for solidarity with others.
It is a principle of action I recommend to you all, for when we eliminate personal survival from our victory conditions, when we accept death and “the many ills to which the flesh is heir” as Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet, as imposed conditions of struggle against overwhelming force and power, authority, and state terror and tyranny, we free ourselves from the limits of our flesh and can turn pain and fear as the means of enslavement against the tyrants of our dehumanization as forces of liberation and seizure of power. Freud called this death transcendence, and it is a precondition of autonomy in revolutionary struggle as self ownership of identity.
As Max Stirner said, “Freedom cannot be granted; it must be seized”.
Let us resist authority whenever it claims us, by any means necessary, and become exalted beyond ourselves in a liberty which cannot be taken from us.
As I wrote in my post of July 26 2020, Explaining Badly What I Do, For Even I Am Not Altogether Certain: a Confession and Letter to a Suicide Squad; Sometimes my quest found only death and loss, sometimes triumph and illumination, but the struggle itself was always a seizure of power in which something human could be wrested back from the claws of our nothingness.
Among the prizes and exhibits of my memory palace are heroes and rogues, allies and enemies of whom only I, like Ishmael, live to tell the tale; others became legends. So also with the causes for which we fought.
What if we teachers told our students what life is really like, that its full of blood and horror and in the end means nothing at all except whatever meaning we can bring to it, and the best you can do is survive another day and maybe save someone from the darkness before it swallows us all? I’ve looked into the darkness since 1982 in Beirut, when Jean Genet swore me to the Oath of the Resistance before his capture and imprisonment by Israel, and as Nietzsche warned it has begun to look back at me.
Yet I will struggle with the darkness and cease not, and so remain unconquered in defiance of unjust authority and in refusal to submit, though I have sometimes forgotten why. At moments of doubt such as this I read again Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus, Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, Henley’s Invictus, I.F. Stone’s The Trial of Socrates; myths, stories, poetry, and history of the grandeur of resistance which confers freedom, beyond hope of victory or even survival.
Refusal to submit is the primary human act. We can be killed, tortured, starved and imprisoned; but we cannot be defeated so long as we refuse to obey. This is our victory, in which we seize ownership of ourselves and create ourselves anew, and nothing can take this from us. In our refusal to submit, disobedience, and defiance of authority we become unstoppable as the tides, for force fails at the point of disobedience and authority has no power which is not granted to it by those it claims, and once questioned, mocked, exposed, and challenged as illegitimate the illusions with which it seduces us vanish into the nothingness from which they came.
Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
Pandora’s Box bears a last gift which is also a curse; we cling to it when it is all we have, and because it cannot be taken from us. I have never been able to decide if this is a good thing or not. Why has this strange gift been given to us?
Maybe it’s only this; that so long as we get back to our feet for yet another Last Stand, there is hope.
And so I open the Forbidden Door to the unknown and step through as I have many times before, a nameless shadow among countless others who await in welcome all those who dare to transgress the limits unjustly imposed on us, a realm of shadows and of the Unconquered, and like lions we roar our defiance into the fathoms of emptiness beyond.
Such is the only possible response to the terror of our nothingness and its weaponization by those who would enslave us; the roar of defiance, as lions who are masterless and free.
To fascism there can be but one reply; Never Again. And to the tyranny and terror of those who would enslave us, let us give reply with the immortal words of Shakespeare in Julius Caesar, the play which Nelson Mandela used as a codex to unify resistance against Apartheid among the political prisoners of Robben Island; Sic Semper Tyrannis, Ever Thus to Tyrants.
Known as the Robben Island Bible, this copy of Shakespeare was passed around as the key to a book code for secret messages which referred to page and line; it was also underlined. On December 16th 1977, Nelson Mandela authorized direct action by underlining this passage from Julius Caesar;
“Cowards die many times before their deaths.
The valiant never taste of death but once.
Of all the wonders that I yet have heard,
It seems to me most strange that men should fear,
Seeing that death, a necessary end,
Will come when it will come.”
Tonight the shadows dance, wild and free, bound by no rules but our own; come and dance with us.
Notes on Letter to a Suicide Squad
I wrote this as guidance and general principles of Resistance to tyranny, Antifascist action, and Revolutionary struggle; but also as a letter to a suicide squad who had volunteered to hunt the hunters and rescue their victims, in the confusion of mass action during the Black Lives Matter protests of the Summer of Fire in 2020 which became a moving street fight in hundreds of cities with forces of repression, which the government of the United States of America used as concealment for Homeland Security death squads to abduct, torture, and assassinate innocent civilians at random as state terror to repress dissent through learned helplessness. A state which sacrifices its legitimacy for control has doomed itself; if its actions can be exposed and its fig leaf stolen. Such is a primary goal of revolutionary struggle; but the people must also be protected, and publicly witnessed to be so, by those who would liberate them. As Shakespeare’s Henry the Fifth says; “When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler hand is the surest winner.”
A fascinating essay by Cecil Bloom published in the Jerusalem Post, entitled The 36 Just Men Who Save the World, examines the mythic idea that existence is perpetuated not by the mighty, by Plato’s Philosopher-Kings or Hegel’s World Geniuses, not by Nietzschean Supermen or hegemonic elites, but by ordinary people through everyday acts of kindness toward others, as the movements of a butterflies’ wings may create whirlwinds.
This I call becoming Living Autonomous Zones rather than lamedvavnikim, and among the origins of the idea of mutualism and interdependence as the moral basis for society, one owned and originating in the unauthorized identities of the underclasses as a primary seizure of power from imposed ideas of virtue as submission to authority, the myth of Good Acts as the force which creates and maintains the material universe remains a compelling vision.
“There is an old Jewish legend that every generation has 36 saints (lamedvavnikim) on whose piety the fate of the world depends. The Book of Proverbs provides an early source for the belief that the just man is the basis of the existence of the world: “When the storm wind passes, the wicked is no more, but the righteous is an everlasting foundation” (10:25). That is to say, that the righteous man holds up and supports the world just as the foundations of a building support it. Another source for the legend is from the Mishnaic period (1st-2nd century): “When the righteous come to the world, good comes to the world and misfortune is removed but when the righteous pass away disaster comes and goodness leaves the world” (Tosefta, Sofa 10:1). The specific reference to this phenomenon is in the Babylonian Talmud, which attributes to a fourth-century Babylonian teacher, Abbaye, the statement: “There are not less than 36 righteous men in every generation who receive the Shechina (the Divine presence). It is written, happy are all they who wait for Himâ” (Sanhedrin 97b; Sukkot 45a).
The Hebrew for Himâ (lamed vav) also represents the number 36 in Hebrew numerology (Gematria) and this provides the basis for the number of saints. The number may also be derived from the verse “Happy are all they who hope for Himâ” (Isaiah 30:18), which has been interpreted to mean: Happy are all they who hope for the 36,†that is, who depend or rely on these 36 just men.
There is a less well-accepted belief that there are 72 saints. The Zohar points to Hosea 10:2, which reads: “Their heart is divided.” The gematria of their heart in Hebrew is 72, which some have interpreted as representing 36 saints in Eretz Israel and 36 in the Diaspora.
At first the Talmud viewed lamedvavnikim merely as being good individuals, but later they began to be seen as hidden saints and many legends then circulated about them. Unrecognized by their fellow men and unknown even to each other, they are said to pursue humble occupations such as artisans or water-carriers. They do not admit their identity to anyone and, if challenged, would deny their membership. The Almighty is said to replace a lamedvavnik immediately upon death. A just man is believed to emerge and use his hidden powers when a Jewish community is threatened and return to obscurity once his task has been completed. This belief has given rise to the suspicion that a stranger who suddenly appears and who seems mysterious may be a lamedvavnik. Several legends claim that one of the 36 is the Messiah, who will reveal himself when the time is ripe. Others contend that as soon as a hidden just man is revealed, he dies.
It has been argued that the number 36 derives from sources other than those discussed above. One is that it comes from ancient astrology where the 360 degrees of the heavenly circle are divided into 36 units of dean and these deans were looked upon as guardians of the universe. Another theory is that 36 is the square of six which is said to be the symbol of the created world in Alexandrian Jewish philosophy but both these theories are not convincing.
Little research, however, seems to have been carried out to conclusively identify the legend’s origin. The lamedvavnik tradition is an Ashkenazi belief Sephardim do not recognize it but it has been present in Kabbalistic literature from the 16th century and in hassidic legends from the late 18th century. There are two 18th-century kabbalistic books whose authors, Rabbi Neta of Szinawa and Rabbi Eisik, a shohet from Przemysl, have been described as being lamedvavnikim. Hassidim recognize two categories of saint: those who work in full view and the hidden ones who belong to a higher order of men. Tales of the lamedvavnikim are widespread, particularly in hassidic literature. The noted hassidic scholar, Martin Buber, also introduced the lamedvavnik into some of his writings. Some hassidic tales emphasize the role of the saint behind a boorish or uncouth facade, a theme also used in some stories of the Baâl Shem Tov. Apparently, this was to make people believe that a noble soul could live within every man and that one should not draw conclusions from appearances.
Prominent writers, from Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav in the 18th century to 20th-century writers of the stature of S.Y. Agnon and Elie Wiesel have been attracted to the subject. Rabbi Nachman’s The Prince who was made entirely of precious stones introduces us to two lamedvavnikim who, on different occasions, helped a king to beget a daughter and a son and also to save the son from disaster. In Agnon’s The Hidden Tzaddik, the lamedvavnik is a stovemaker who wants to be buried in a plot where the stillborn are buried and whose grave should not be marked with a tombstone. Agnon followed the tradition faithfully, but Rabbi Nachman’s tale indicated that others knew of the identity of the two lamedvavnikim because it was only when the king ordered the Jewish community to help him that the two saints were produced. Elie Wiesel’s One of the Just Men also abandons the idea that the identity of these men is hidden, but Albert Memmi keeps to the traditional view in his The Unrecognised Just Men.
One novel on the subject, Andre Schwartz-Bart’s The Last of the Just, achieved best-seller status in 1960. Ernie Levy, a descendant of the 12th-century R.Yom Tov Levy is depicted as being one of the Just Men, inheriting the honor through his family line. The story of the Levy family begins in York in 1185, covers the Inquisition and pogroms in Kiev and describes many other indignities. Ernie is the last of the line and he is destroyed in Hitler’s gas chambers. Schwartz-Bart’s interpretation of the legend is a controversial one because the honor of being a lamedvavnik is not handed down from father to son. Nevertheless, this novel that won the prestigious Prix Goncourt, France’s most important literary award, gave rise to much interest in the legend.”
Here is my witness of history regarding how I learned the principles of revolutionary struggle at the age of nine; I spent recess at school during fifth grade either playing chess with the Principal or experimenting with the chemistry set in the classroom, which doubtless seemed odd, unfriendly, and aloof to the other children whom I failed to play with. Someone retaliated by putting gum on my seat, which I found insulting, so during the next recess I poured some chemicals marked as poison with the skull and crossbones down the spigot of the drinking faucet, reasoning that water pressure would let them pool in the u-tube just below so that everyone who went for a drink of water after playing ball at recess would get a dose. That afternoon half a dozen kids were outside throwing up, and I felt not triumph but horror, because I realized I could have unintentionally killed everyone. I told my father about it that night.
To this my father replied; “You have discovered politics; this is about fear and power as the basis of human exchange and relationships. Most importantly, it is about the use of force.
Fear is a good servant and a terrible master; those who use it to subjugate others are motivated by fear themselves, and if you can show them you do not fear them they will be afraid of you, and fear becomes a lever you can use to seize power and win dominance. Fear is a ground of struggle. Fear precedes power. So, whose instrument will it be?”
On this anniversary of the police murder of George Floyd, a transformative moment in the Reckoning of our nation with institutional and systemic racism, a discredited and corrupt police state of white supremacist terror and brutal tyranny of force and control, and the legacies of historical inequalities and injustices as a national epigenetic illness of racism and power, we mourn the tragedy of his murder, one incident of racist cruelty and the arrogance of power among countless others, but we also celebrate the triumphant solidarity and refusal to submit of the Black Lives Matter movement which it triggered, and which may yet redeem us with transformative change and a reimagination of our possibilities of becoming human.
We meet the moment of this anniversary with all its inchoate multiplicities of meaning, shifting and relative truths, bidirectional forces of reaction and resistance, of despair at our powerlessness as victims of the carceral state, systemic racism, and the sacrifice of our nation’s children by the Republican Party on the altar of their power in refusal to confront an epidemic of gun violence and enact reasonable laws to keep weapons of terror, death, and mass destruction out of the hands of madmen and criminals in subservience to organizations of white supremacist terror like the NRA; in the midst of all of this and the epigenetic trauma and shared public grieving of the legacies of historical and systemic racism and the fetishization of violence and of guns as symbols of white male power and privilege, but also rage which may transform into action.
Look at the faces of the victims of gun violence and white supremacist terror. Why did they die?
They died for the power and wealth of elites for whom their lives are nothing. For this crime there can be no justice, as justice too is owned by those who would enslave us. For the dead we can do nothing; it is the living who must be avenged, and the systemic inequality of the business of empire which sacrifices children on the altar of imperial dominion and elite hegemonies of wealth and power wherein the carceral state requires an unchecked and limitless civilian gun market to keep arms manufacturers in business so we are always tooled up to fight vast wars of dominion and defend our markets and control of strategic resources like oil, regardless of the costs of randomly murdered civilians. Indeed this helps the state justify its police forces of occupation and repression of dissent; pervasive gun violence creates fear which the state weaponizes in service to power.
As Joe Biden said; “As a nation, we have to ask, when in God’s name are we going to stand up to the gun lobby? When in God’s name will we do what we all know in our gut needs to be done?”
Regarding solidarity and the total freedom conferred by the act of refusal to submit as Resistance, I have a story to tell you, and a gift to share with you; membership in a tradition of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. Here I offer you the Oath of the Resistance, as it was given to me by Jean Genet in Beirut in 1982.
During the summer before my senior year of university in San Francisco, I had set out on a culinary Grand Tour of the Mediterranean, learning to cook the food I loved, and was in Beirut when Israel invaded Lebanon and trapped me in a city under siege. Feral bands of soldiers were roaming the streets committing atrocities; one such unit of the Israeli Defense Forces set some children on fire, laughing and making bets on how far they could run screaming before they fell into pools of blackened ruin and their screams became silent. I found myself fighting them; others joined me, we joined whole networks of such groups already fighting, and more joined us; together we united in mass action with a vast and diverse resistance and liberation struggle. From that day forward I was part of the defense of Beirut against the siege.
A fabulous café that had the best strawberry crepes in the world lay on the far side of a sniper alley, which my friends and I made an extreme sport of dashing across to reach breakfast while the occasional bullet impacted the wall behind us. One day we arrived in our usual high spirits when an elegant gentleman sat at my table, and speaking in French began a conversation with, “I’m told you do this every day, race against death for breakfast.”
To which I replied, “Moments stolen from death belong to us, and set us free. This is all we truly own and which make us human, such defining moments; memories, stories, histories, identities. Against the terror of our nothingness we have only this with which to find a balance; the truths written in our flesh and the joy of total freedom to discover them. It is a poor man who loves nothing beyond reason and has no pleasures worth dying for.”
He smiled and said, “I agree”, and so began our conversations at breakfast in the last days before the Fall of Beirut, unforgettable days for this is where he set me on my life’s path.
There came a day when the barricades were overrun and our neighborhood along with it, one of our last days together. With the streets suddenly filled with Israeli soldiers in a sack of murder and other vileness of terror and inhumanity, ordering people into the streets to surrender and setting fires to burn alive in their homes anyone who refused, and the discovery of our only weapon being the bottle of champagne we had just finished with our strawberry crepes as the building we were in was set on fire, I asked my breakfast companion if he had any ideas. To this he replied with an apologetic shrug and another question, “Fix bayonets?”
We laughed, and he elaborated; “When all hope is lost, we are free to do impossible things, glorious things.” This advice I find necessary to recall from time to time, and which I recommend to you all.
Then he asked, “Will you surrender?’
To which I replied, “No.”
“Nor I,” he said, standing. “As I share with you now, pass to others at need; this is an oath I devised in 1940 from the one I took as a Legionnaire, for the resistance to the Nazi occupation which friends of mine were forming. It may be the finest thing I ever stole.”
And so I offer to all of you the Oath of the Resistance as it was given to me by the great Jean Genet in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a time of force and darkness, in a last stand and an act of defiance beyond hope of victory or survival; “We swear our loyalty to each other, who answer tyranny and fascism with Liberty and Equality; to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.”
To fascism and the idea that some of us are better than others by condition of our birth there can be but one reply; Never Again.
To all those who hunger to be free, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, whom Frantz Fanon named The Wretched of the Earth, this I say; you are not alone.
Let none stand alone who refuse to submit to the tyranny and terror of force and control, who speak truth to power and question, expose, mock, and challenge authority, who answer division with solidarity, control with disobedience, authorized identities, virtue, and normality with transgression, who run amok and are ungovernable.
Nor can our souls be stolen from us by either the brutal repression of fear nor the seduction of lies and illusions, we who call the enemy by his true names and stand united in the cause of our liberty, for who refuses to submit and cannot be compelled by force and control becomes Unconquered and free.
In Resistance we are all, each of us, Living Autonomous Zones. No one speaks or answers for us, nothing is beyond question, and all authority which claims us is without legitimacy or meaning.
When those who would enslave us come for one of us, let them be met with all of us; let the fascist tyrannies of blood, faith, and soil and the elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege find not a humankind broken by cruelty and state terror nor divided by hierarchies of exclusionary otherness, not hopeless and abject as products of a system of dehumanization, commodification, and falsification, not disempowered by learned helplessness nor conditioned to submit to authority and force, but a humankind united in resistance; an unconquerable and United Humankind.
For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.
As I wrote in my post of June 20 2022, Say Their Names: the Visual Iconography of the Black Lives Matter Movement for Racial Justice as Ritual Mourning; As I reflect on the visual iconography and witness of history in film and photography of our epochal reckoning of equality and racial justice, I am awed by the possibilities for civilizational transformation of this moment, by its tidal force as the people reclaim their power from governments throughout the world which have betrayed them in three successive waves of revolution; #metoo, Extinction Rebellion & Fridays for Future, and Black Lives Matter, all driving motives and informing sources which empower the global democracy revolution against fascism and tyranny. If we are to be free, we must begin by being equal.
The Hobgoblin’s fragmented mirror in Anderson’s The Snow Queen provides a metaphor of America’s historical memory and vision of ourselves; mirrors, cameras, things that reflect but also capture and distort. This image is shaped by the three primary forces of race, wealth, and gender which together act to subjugate, falsify, commodify, and dehumanize us. And this we must resist.
According to Henry Louis Gates Jr. as written in The Root; “In the history of the trans-Atlantic slave trade (1525-1866), 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. Of them, 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America. Only about 388,000 were transported directly from Africa to North America”.
If we count only the known victims of racial violence since Emancipation, we have a legacy of crimes against humanity in a nation founded on the principle that all persons are created equal which reveals this to be an Original Lie; racism is not a failure of our system, but a key element of its design. Now count all the Black people who lived and died as American slaves from the first landing in 1661 to Juneteenth.
The names of the victims of racism in our nation become an infinite loop of misery and despair, a lamentation of the brokenness of the world and of the human cost of a system which uses divisions of exclusionary otherness to change some of us into things to be used for the profit of a few oligarchic families of apex predators. Ideologies of white supremacy perpetuate inequality in our society today; the wolves are still among us, even if they must disguise themselves as sheep.
Among the most terrible instruments of those who would enslave us is this erasure and silencing of Black voices, of concealment of the scope and horror of the legacy of slavery in the power asymmetries and inequalities we are heir to. We have hundreds of years of lost lives and names to reclaim, and we can not lose a single one more.
Every one of those lost lives is an Unknown Soldier in the struggle for Liberty; let us honor them with our actions as songs of survival and revolution, and make of one another living monuments to our unconquered freedom in defiance of those who would enslave us.
Of the many insightful essays written of this moment in history and its transformative and revolutionary consequences for human meaning and being, few are as eloquent as Chaédria LaBouvier’s writing in The Cut, entitled
The Afterlife of George Floyd: A Portfolio by Photographer Eli Reed American iconography of a death, history, and a Black southern homecoming; “It is a beautiful symmetry to have Eli Reed’s photographs capture and canonize this American chapter and George Floyd’s funeral. Reed is one of the best living photographers and is walking history himself; he is the first Black photographer to join Magnum Photos and is a member of Kamoinge, the Black photography collective that has in its DNA Roy DeCarava, a founding father of black-and-white fine photography.
The images are something, as they say down South, perhaps even more so because George Floyd is so present and absent from them. Where is he? It’s just as well that Floyd be in absentia, in a sense, from a photo series about him. Find George Floyd, the human, the person who unsuspectingly became a symbol, the father, the man who called out for his mother as he lay dying. Reed’s photos aren’t the expected intimacy of a funeral’s mise-en-scène with the casket and Floyd’s family — like that of Medgar Evers and Martin Luther King — but it is hard to find a real reason why America would have deserved that kind of record for the ages anyway. In lieu of photographing Floyd, Reed’s camera tenderly captures the minutiae of people, in the middle of a pandemic, social collapse, and a revolution, willing themselves to bear witness.
The iconography of George Floyd’s death begins, in the modern sense, in the lynching postcards of the early 20th century. They are a perverse picture of Americana; they are souvenirs from the scenes of murders. Like the leather wallets and belts fashioned from human skin afterwards, these postcards were first and foremost evidence of many things — murder, the unhinged fantasies of White subconsciousness that have long been anchored in the idea of a Black chattel class and a belief in the unalienable right to act out that role play. That a reminder of that kind of unforgettable horror could even be necessary or even desired is an indication of what has long not been well with White America, and for quite some time; Lillian Smith, a Georgia native who framed White supremacy as a mental illness, wrote in Killers of the Dream, “These ceremonials in honor of white supremacy … slip from the conscious mind down deep into the muscles.” James Baldwin put it more explicitly: “And they have brought humanity to the edge of oblivion: because they think they are White.”
Video is not infinite, but it is the strongest contender in humankind’s constant quest to conquer the infinite in real time. In its cruel loopability and limitless excess, what is immortality if not an excess of everything? Everything becomes excessive on video: the length, the audience, the distribution, the distortion, the filters. America has met its match. America has found a medium capable of showing her to herself without tiring and with the matched coldness and unrelenting brutality with which America has always treated Black people.
Perhaps this helps explain why the last moments of Black life on video have found an audience and momentum to catalyze protest and people in our contemporary times. That objectivity and excess of video have distilled the core of the moment in a way few mediums can: The combination of free-range prerogative and unhinged fantasies of White people has long been at the center of these murders and subjugations. The person and the body may be Black, but they are not the subject. It’s what makes Emmett Till’s body so difficult to look at; it is not him, it is not Mamie’s child. It is the site of an imagination, deranged, it is the deadly narcissism of Whiteness’s desires as bluntly as the point can be made, and infinitely as need be. Watching Derek Chauvin kneel on George Floyd’s neck for eight minutes is truly unhinged, and we are watching him enact the same fantasy that his forefathers stood proudly for in photographs when Black bodies were swinging from poplar trees. Video does not tire, and as such on a cellular level, we know America and we know that we will see another Black person die on video again. And that has absolutely nothing to do with Black people.
And so, it is in this weird moment — between the slight beginnings of a White reckoning and the evermore Black activism that has always been this country’s moral North Star — that the afterlife of George Floyd begins.
He is a child of Texas, a son of Houston’s Third Ward, Cissy Floyd’s firstborn, and as the sun set on June 9, 2020, he returned to them. Watching the procession of Floyd’s horse drawn recalled Ossie Davis’s eulogy for Malcolm X: “and we will know him then for what he was and is — a prince.” Indeed, Floyd’s homecoming was fit for a king; this has always been the visual thesis of African-American funerary, especially when someone has been stolen from us. The horse-drawn carriage, the gold casket, the choir, the Appian Way procession of the last mile to his grave; George Floyd was given a state funeral by the people, his people.
For it is in the visuals and the iconography of the homecoming — so called by enslaved people because they believed, upon death, their soul would return to Africa — that the person, the human, the humanity reemerges. The last moments of Black life under the duress of unpoliced imaginations, to paraphrase Claudia Rankine, have very little to do with Black life. And if the afterlife is a journey that is filled with abundance, beauty, and absent of all the ignorant, cruel, and dull things that make this physical one at times unbearable, it would make sense that the beginnings of the Black afterlife have absolutely nothing to do with White people. And yet, it is also never not complicated and complex; the Houston Police Department escorted his cortege on its final journey. Make of that what you will.
The visual foundation of Floyd’s afterlife incorporates themes of majesty, splendor, and nobility that are a deeply historical call-and-response to Blackness in funerary and the afterlife across time. It recalls the ancient Egyptians, New Orleans’s jazz funerals, the funeral pageantry of West African tribes, Geechee and Lowcountry funerals, the work of photographer James Van Der Zee and the promised abundance of the “upper room” in works such as Alma Thomas’s painting “Resurrection.” Floyd returned home to the very specific African-Creole corridor of East Texas and Western Louisiana is worth considering. Here, his iconography and afterlife begins in one of the most stunning ancestral regions for African-Americans — and one of the most infamously racist. A place from which the most desperate domestic refugees fled and still, to this day, flee up North for a different type of racism. Floyd himself had fled up North, to Minneapolis, like Mamie Till went up to Chicago. Further east, Emmett Till’s afterlife had its beginnings in this corridor too in the Mississippi Delta — in the Tallahatchie River, to be exact.
Where is George Floyd? How do we find him? We have no clue how and where he will settle in history, art history, how his last moments will enter a canon of filmed death. What we are looking for, beyond the momentum of canonization and movement, is him. Those intimate, quotidian, and mundane things which begrudgingly and solemnly construct a life and one’s work in it. Who will replace his hello to the people who are used to seeing him every day? If he is that person in the neighborhood who takes out the trash for the elderly women who live alone on the block, who will take his place? Who will lead George Floyd’s Bible studies or be the gentle giant in the barbershop, on the block, and at the corner store? How do a community and a family replace what is irreplaceable? Reed’s photographs began looking for these unanswerable questions.
His images recall the tenderness and difficulty of a watercolor portrait. A watercolor portrait is a small miracle; a painter must work quickly, with sustained velocity and controlled chaos, to bend the fluidity of water and the subject’s essence to reveal something luminous, telling, and coherent. Maybe it is the same mastery of application at work here; Reed’s camera captures the uncapturable, what it meant to be in the sticky humidity of that Houston evening that smelled like grief, mosquito repellent, candle wax, and cedar wood. For those not there, Reed’s work acts as a bridge to translate the mourning, the prayer circles, the enormous and quotidian worries of those there — the traffic afterwards, if the chicken left in the sink had fully thawed by the time they got home, if something calamitous would happen on the way back, what would happen now to George’s family, now that he was in the ground and the real shattering, breaking, and healing (maybe) begins. The luminosity of the human experience is here in the artist’s offering to George Floyd, a lion in the winter of his years who has captured wars at home and abroad, still working, this time in the looming discontent of Juneteenth, a plague, and the knocking knees of an empire in collapse. Somewhere in there is a radical love, a belief that George is still owed more, that Black people are deserving of more and that they must have it, and they must have it yesterday, today, tomorrow, and forever. Like watercolors, the fervency of this simple truth is hard to capture. It is that love for, and of, and by Black people at the very root of it all which propels the people to the street, prepared to die if it should come down to it. And it is because, like Ossie Davis said of Malcolm, they love us so.
It is, as they say down South, truly something.”
How police killings are kept hidden: ‘We don’t know how many George Floyds there are’
One year on, how George Floyd’s murder has changed the world
This article is more than 3 years old
The killing of Floyd by a white officer reflected a common history of violence against Black people that united protesters in a renewed global movement
In the wake of the great Reckoning, what will a future Israel and Palestine become?
One clear and immediate result of this historic act by the ICC in calling for the arrest of Netanyahu and his collaborators in genocide is the recognition of the state of Palestine by Ireland, Spain, and Norway, which leaves American and Britain among the primary refuseniks of the world. Curious now I am; which Palestinian government will be receiving this splendid recognition?
No united nation of Palestine yet exists; we now have a nation divided into Apartheid model Bantustans by Israeli conquest and American complicity; Hamas is the legitimate state of Gaza which it captured not from Israel but from Fatah in 2007, and again from al Qaeda in the 2009 Battle of Rafah in which I fought, versus PLO-Fatah’s state of the West Bank and East Jerusalem under nominal control by its inheritor government the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, which is compromised by cooperation with Israel and its status as a Vichy state as well as unwillingness to confront Israeli aggression and defend its people militarily.
These rivals, Hamas and the PA, represent the de facto Palestinian states on the ground as of now, from which any legitimate united Palestine must be constructed, but the situation is far more complex, with many factions and the interests of foreign powers involved. Considering the assassination of Iran’s leader this week, so deft not even the shadow of his assassin was left upon the tides of history, the integration of Hezbollah into any new Palestine remains problematic.
We will be very lucky indeed if the status of the Gaza War as a theatre of World War Three and Russia’s imperial conquest and dominion of the Middle East and the Mediterranean, which is interdependent with her ally Iran’s conflict versus the Arab-American Alliance, does not consume us all.
The realization of a Palestine whose security is guaranteed by the UN from brigandage, kleptocratic land grabs, quasi enslavement, and imperial conquest and dominion by the outlaw state of Israel has some distance yet to go to be achieved; but true parity and equality between the two nations will be far more swift and certain if the people of Israel reimagine and transform their nation as an institution of secular democracy wherein Jews and Muslims are equal under the law and a guarantor of our universal human rights including those of Palestinians rather than a nightmare of theocratic and racist tyranny and state terror as it is now.
The best solution to this conflict now of over seventy years originating in one people divided by history in service to those who would enslave them remains simple; the peoples of Israel and Palestine refuse to kill each other and unite in solidarity against the authoritarian regimes which claim without legitimacy to act in their names.
Simple, yes; but sadly never easy.
As written by Peter Beaumont and Sam Jones in The Guardina, in an article entitled How significant is Spain, Norway and Ireland’s recognition of Palestinian state? Recognitions point to erosion of US ‘ownership’ of Israel-Palestine peace process and open route towards statehood; “What happened on Wednesday morning – and why?
In a carefully choreographed move that followed weeks of discussions, the Norwegian, Spanish and Irish governments have said they intend to recognise the state of Palestine.
Norway, which has played a pivotal role in Middle East diplomacy over the years, hosting Israeli-Palestinian peace talks at the beginning of the 1990s which led to the Oslo accords, said recognition was needed to support moderate voices amid the Gaza war.
“In the midst of a war, with tens of thousands killed and injured, we must keep alive the only alternative that offers a political solution for Israelis and Palestinians alike: two states, living side by side, in peace and security,” said Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre.
Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, accused Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, of carrying out a “massacre” in Gaza and jeopardising the two-state solution. “We have to use all the political resources at our disposal to say, loud and clear, that we’re not going to allow the possibility of the two-state solution to be destroyed by force because it’s the only just and sustainable solution to this terrible conflict.”
The Irish prime minister, Simon Harris, said he expected other countries to join Ireland, Spain and Norway in recognising a Palestinian state in the coming weeks. He said Ireland was unequivocal in fully recognising Israel and its right to exist “securely and in peace with its neighbours”, and he called for all the hostages in Gaza to be immediately returned.
Is there a timetable for the recognition?
Norway, Spain and Ireland have said they will formally recognise Palestine on 28 May.
Is the recognition of a Palestinian state a first for European countries?
Not at all. In 2014, Sweden became the first country to recognise Palestine while being an EU member state. Speaking at the time, Sweden’s foreign minister said: “It is an important step that confirms the Palestinians’ right to self-determination. We hope that this will show the way for others.” However, a number of European countries – including Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania – recognised Palestine in the late 1980s, well before they became EU members.
Meanwhile, around 140 of the 193 UN member states have recognised Palestinian statehood since 1988.
What does it mean for the peace process?
Scores of countries already recognise Palestine as an independent state, but the momentum towards recognition, particularly among European countries, will have important implications.
Perhaps most significant is how the new recognitions point to the erosion of US “ownership” of the Israel-Palestine peace process since the period of Oslo peace talks and agreement.
With the peace process long largely moribund, Palestinian officials have been working assiduously to canvass support in Europe for a process that accelerated in the Trump era as Palestinians were sidelined by the Abraham accords and Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, provoking a deep distrust of the US, which Palestinians feel has not been an honest broker.
Sweden, Norway, Ireland and Spain have long been seen as sympathetic to the Palestinians. The UK has also indicated it could consider recognising Palestine amid a deeper frustration over the long refusal of Israel – not least during the Netanyahu era – to advance towards a two-state solution, even as Israel has continued appropriating Palestinian land for settlement.
As Hugh Lovatt of the European Council on Foreign Relations says, it also opens a meaningful route towards statehood. “Recognition is a tangible step towards a viable political track leading to Palestinian self-determination.
“This is a pre-requisite for securing Arab engagement in support of a sustainable ceasefire in Gaza. As part of their ‘Arab vision’ plan to implement a two-state solution, states such as Saudi Arabia have called for US and European recognition of Palestine.”
Will it have a practical impact for Palestinians?
The momentum towards recognition may be a double-edged sword for Mahmoud Abbas’s unpopular, weak and corrupt Palestinian Authority, which governs in the occupied West Bank, where the ageing Abbas has not held legislative elections since 2006. Abbas himself has no popular mandate.
Any expectations that the latest recognitions will change the miserable conditions on the West Bank, where attacks by Israeli security forces and settlers have escalated, will almost certainly be premature, and more discontent could be directed at Abbas.
However, recognition implies a right to Palestinian self-determination, which could also help reinvigorate a Palestinian civil society that has been suffocated in the Abbas era. Perhaps most important for Palestinians is something less tangible: the acceptance that they have an explicit and fundamental right to self-determination that does not require Israel’s permission, a notion that has underpinned US mediation since Oslo.
What are the implications for Israel?
A cliche in Israel politics for more than a decade – and coined by the former prime minister Ehud Barak – is that Israel risks a diplomatic tsunami because of its policies. In recent weeks that tsunami has begun crashing down on Netanyahu. The recognition falls hard on the heels of Netanyahu and his defence minister, Yoav Gallant, being told that warrants are being sought against them for war crimes by the prosecutor at the international criminal court. Israel is being investigated at South Africa’s behest for alleged genocide at the international court of justice too.
The US, the UK and other countries have begun imposing a regime of sanctions against violent settlers and the far-right groups that support them. Now three important European states have unilaterally decided to recognise Palestinian statehood.
While there remains a profound disconnect in Israeli society over the international distaste for its right/far-right government and the way it has been conducting its campaign in Gaza, Israelis are also aware that their country is increasingly being treated as a pariah and becoming ever more diplomatically isolated. That has, in part, driven the increasing and the suddenly more visible fractures within Netanyahu’s own cabinet, raising serious questions over how long his government can survive.”
As written by Sophie Jeong, Zahid Mahmood, Al Goodman, Niamh Kennedy and Sana Noor Haq for CNN, in an article entitled Ireland, Spain and Norway say they will recognize a Palestinian state; “ Ireland, Spain and Norway have announced plans to formally recognize a Palestinian state next week, in a move that is likely to bolster the global Palestinian cause but further strain relations between Europe and Israel.
The three European nations say their landmark decision is the best way to achieve lasting peace in the Middle East, but it sparked swift condemnation from Israel, as its foreign minister ordered the immediate recall of its ambassadors from those countries.
Most of the world already recognizes Palestinian statehood. More than 140 out of 193 member states of the United Nations have made their recognition official. But only some nations in the 27-member European Union are among them.
Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris told a Wednesday news conference in Dublin: “Today, Ireland, Norway and Spain are announcing that we recognize the state of Palestine. Each of us will now undertake whatever national steps are necessary to give effect to that decision.”
“There is never a wrong time to do the right thing,” Harris later said, speaking to CNN’s Christiana Amanpour on Thursday.
“It was my government’s preferred position to recognize a two-state solution as part of a peace process to bring that about, but sadly, unfortunately, such a comprehensive peace settlement now seems, in many ways, further away than it has ever been,” Harris said.
“We believe you can’t say you’re in favor of a two-state solution and not recognize the very existence of two states,” he added.
The recognition will come into force in all three countries on May 28, according to Irish Foreign Minister Micheál Martin.
Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said that a Palestinian state was “a prerequisite for achieving peace in the Middle East.”
“There will be no peace in the Middle East without a two-state solution,” Støre said in a statement. “There can be no two-state solution without a Palestinian state.”
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez sought to characterize the decision as one that was not anti-Israel.
“This recognition is not against the people of Israel and certainly not against the Jewish people,” he said. “It’s not in favor of Hamas. It’s in favor of co-existence.”
The announcement was welcomed by Palestinian officials.
“This step reflects Spain’s keenness to support the Palestinian people and their inalienable and legitimate rights to their land and homeland,” the office of the president of the Palestinian Authority said in response to Madrid’s decision, as reported by Palestinian news agency Wafa.
Hamas, the militant group which governs Gaza, urged other countries to follow suit and “recognize our legitimate national rights, support the struggle of our people for liberation and independence, and end the Zionist occupation of our land.”
But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said recognizing a Palestinian state would be a “reward for terror.”
“This will be a terror state, which will attempt to perpetrate the onslaught of October 7 time and again, and to that we shall not agree,” Netanyahu said, adding, “this evil must not be given a state.”
As Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz ordered the immediate recall of its ambassadors to Spain, Norway and Ireland, he said, in a statement: “I am sending a clear message today — Israel will not hold back against those who undermine its sovereignty and endanger its security.”
“After the terrorist organization Hamas carried out the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, after it committed the most horrific sex crimes the world has seen, these countries chose to give a reward to Hamas and Iran and recognize a Palestinian state,” Katz added.
Israel launched its military offensive in Gaza on October 7 after militants led by Hamas killed at least 1,200 people and abducted more than 250 others.
Israel has come under fierce criticism for its war. Earlier this month, a panel of independent UN experts condemned “the continued and systematic onslaught of violence committed against Palestinians in Gaza.” The agency has repeatedly called for a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages taken by Hamas.
Israeli attacks in Gaza have since killed at least 35,647 Palestinians and injured another 79,852 people, according to the Ministry of Health there. CNN cannot independently confirm the figures.
Two-state solution
All three European leaders stressed the importance of having Palestinian statehood in reaching a two-state solution in the Middle East, a decades-long goal that the international community has failed to achieve.
Ireland’s Foreign Minister Martin said the decision came amid “growing impatience” with Israel’s lack of political will for a two-state solution.
“The integrity of that two-state solution has been undermined in recent years by the strategy of the Israeli government and, in particular, the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has declared opposition to it,” Martin told CNN’s Richard Quest during a live interview.
Meanwhile, Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide told CNN’s Becky Anderson that Israel was wrong to see recognizing Palestinian statehood as rewarding Hamas.
“We are sending the opposite signal. We are supporting the Palestine authorities which spring out of the PLO [Palestine Liberation Organization] who renounce violence and who many decades ago promised to leave the violent struggle behind and work for peaceful settlement with Israel — a promise they have kept by the way,” Eide said.
Senior officials in the United States, a close ally of Israel, have insisted the only way to bring peace and stability to the region is through the creation of a Palestinian state with guarantees for Israel’s security. Lawmakers in Israel have long rejected those calls.
Reacting to the news on Wednesday, a National Security Council spokesperson told CNN that US President Joe Biden “is a strong supporter” of a two-state solution. The spokesperson added, however: “He believes a Palestinian state should be realized through direct negotiations between the parties, not through unilateral recognition.”
France, meanwhile, said that now is not the “right time” for it to join its European neighbors in recognizing a Palestinian state. The country’s foreign minister, Stephane Séjourne, added that such a decision is not merely a “symbolic issue or a question of political positioning” but rather a “diplomatic tool” in the service of a two-state solution.
Germany, another one of Israel’s staunchest allies, also questioned the decision. Michael Roth, the chair of the parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, posted on X: “I’m not convinced that the recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state is an appropriate measure after the horrific massacres (by) Hamas (on) October 7 last year.”
Qatar, a key mediator in stalled ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas, said it hopes “for more countries to recognize the State of Palestine,” according to a statement from the foreign ministry. The foreign ministry of Saudi Arabia, another regional actor, called on “more countries to swiftly take the same stance.”
Ireland has a long history of being openly supportive of the Palestinian cause, consistently criticizing Israeli policies in the occupied West Bank and Gaza before Hamas’ October 7 attack in Israel. Since then, Israel’s war in response has shredded huge parts of the Gaza Strip and drained critical supplies, exposing the entire population of more than 2.2 million people to the risk of famine.
“I can say this to the people of Israel: we recognize the state of Israel. We recognize the state of Israel’s right to live in peace and security. That is their right. The people of Palestine also must have an equivalent right to peace and security,” Harris told Amanpour on Thursday.
“And let me also say this to the people of Israel: the Irish people know what it’s like to have their national identity hijacked by a terrorist organization. The IRA was never the people of Ireland and Hamas is not the people of Palestine.”
“We have been clear and unequivocal that we condemn Hamas, that we condemn the most horrific barbaric massacre that Israel experienced on the 7th of October. We call for the unconditional and immediate release of all hostages. But it is entirely possible to say what I have just said and also say the next bit which sadly some refuse to say: that what is happening in Palestine, what is happening in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe, that children are being starved, are being deprived of food and that there are children who will go to sleep in Gaza tonight not sure if they will wake in the morning,” he added.
A source familiar with the matter told CNN the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs is currently considering further diplomatic steps against the three countries.
Steps under consideration include cancelling visits of officials from these countries to Israel and revoking visas from diplomats, which will limit their ability to visit areas in the West Bank under control of the Palestinian Authority, the source said. Another step under consideration by Israel is to reach out to the US to seek diplomatic support in providing clarification from Norway, Ireland and Spain on their intended decision, and to ask the US to try and convince other countries to not follow suit.
Pressure on Israel
The planned recognition adds pressure on Israel after seven months of fighting, according to H.A. Hellyer, scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in London.
“For individual Palestinians on the ground in the Occupied Territories, it’s not going to mean anything at all in the short term, perhaps in the medium term,” Hellyer told CNN. “It is obviously political recognition by states that don’t have a presence on the ground.”
Hellyer added that Israel risks becoming an “international pariah” given that Western nations are now beginning to recognize a Palestinian state.
Israel captured Gaza from Egypt in the 1967 war, then withdrew its troops and settlers in 2005. The territory, home to some 2 million Palestinians, fell under Hamas’ rule in 2007.
After Hamas took control, Israel and Egypt imposed a strict siege on the territory, which is ongoing. Israel also maintains an air and naval blockade on Gaza. These severe restrictions have been fiercely criticized by international bodies, including Amnesty International, who say Israel has violated international law.
The vast majority of the population in Gaza are descendants of 700,000 Palestinians who fled or were forcibly expelled from their homes during what Palestinians call al-Nakba, or “the catastrophe,” of the 1948-49 war, in what is now Israel.”
Ireland, Spain and Norway say they will recognize a Palestinian state
A Palestinian political perspective on Gaza’s future
Analysis: Post-war planning has largely ignored Palestinian political parties, who have their own comprehensive vision for Gaza, and Palestine’s, future.
24 مايو 2024 في أعقاب الحساب الكبير على جرائم إسرائيل، فإن الاعتراف بسيادة فلسطين واستقلالها يطرح السؤال؛ فلسطين لمن؟ كيف ستصبح فلسطين وإسرائيل في المستقبل؟
في أعقاب الحساب العظيم، كيف سيكون مستقبل إسرائيل وفلسطين؟
إحدى النتائج الواضحة والمباشرة لهذا الإجراء التاريخي الذي اتخذته المحكمة الجنائية الدولية بدعوتها إلى اعتقال نتنياهو والمتعاونين معه في الإبادة الجماعية هو اعتراف أيرلندا وإسبانيا والنرويج بدولة فلسطين، الأمر الذي يترك أمريكا وبريطانيا من بين الرافضين الرئيسيين للقرار. العالم. أنا فضولي الآن؛ وأي حكومة فلسطينية ستحصل على هذا الاعتراف الرائع؟ لا توجد دولة موحدة لفلسطين حتى الآن؛ لدينا الآن أمة مقسمة إلى بانتوستانات نموذجية للفصل العنصري بسبب الغزو الإسرائيلي والتواطؤ الأمريكي؛ حماس هي دولة غزة الشرعية التي استولت عليها ليس من إسرائيل بل من القاعدة، وهو الصراع الذي حاربت فيه، ثم فزت في الانتخابات كحكومة لا جدال فيها، مقابل الضفة الغربية التابعة لمنظمة التحرير الفلسطينية والقدس الشرقية تحت السيطرة الاسمية لوريثها. دولة السلطة الفلسطينية في رام الله، التي يتعرض للخطر بسبب التعاون مع إسرائيل ووضعها كدولة فيشي، فضلا عن عدم الرغبة في مواجهة العدوان الإسرائيلي والدفاع عن شعبها عسكريا.
ويمثل هؤلاء المنافسون، حماس والسلطة الفلسطينية، الدولتين الفلسطينيتين بحكم الأمر الواقع على الأرض اعتبارًا من الآن، والتي يجب أن تُبنى منها أي دولة فلسطينية موحدة شرعية، لكن الوضع أكثر تعقيدًا بكثير، مع وجود العديد من الفصائل ومصالح القوى الأجنبية المعنية. ونظراً لاغتيال الزعيم الإيراني هذا الأسبوع، والذي لم يبق حتى ظل قاتله على مد التاريخ، فإن اندماج حزب الله في أي فلسطين جديدة يظل أمراً مثيراً للإشكالية. سنكون محظوظين للغاية بالفعل إذا تم تغيير وضع حرب غزة كمسرح للحرب العالمية الثالثة والغزو الإمبراطوري الروسي وهيمنته على الشرق الأوسط والبحر الأبيض المتوسط، والذي يعتمد بشكل متبادل على صراع حليفتها إيران ضد التحالف العربي الأمريكي. لا تستهلكنا جميعا.
إن تحقيق فلسطين التي تضمن الأمم المتحدة أمنها من قطع الطرق، والاستيلاء على الأراضي الكليبتوقراطية، وشبه الاستعباد، والغزو الإمبراطوري والسيطرة من قبل دولة إسرائيل الخارجة عن القانون، لا يزال أمامه بعض الطريق لتحقيقه؛ لكن التكافؤ الحقيقي والمساواة بين البلدين سيكونان أكثر سرعة وتأكيدًا إذا أعاد شعب إسرائيل تصور دولته وتحويلها كمؤسسة ديمقراطية وضامنة لحقوق الإنسان العالمية، بما في ذلك حقوق الفلسطينيين، بدلاً من كابوس الاستبداد والاستبداد. إرهاب الدولة كما هو الحال الآن.
إن أفضل حل لهذا الصراع المستمر منذ أكثر من سبعين عامًا والذي ينشأ بين شعب واحد قسمه التاريخ في خدمة أولئك الذين يريدون استعبادهم يظل بسيطًا؛ إن شعبي إسرائيل وفلسطين يرفضان قتل بعضهما البعض ويتحدان في التضامن ضد الأنظمة الاستبدادية التي تدعي دون شرعية التصرف باسمهما.
بسيط، نعم؛ ولكن للأسف ليس من السهل أبدا.
Hebrew
24 במאי 2024 בעקבות ההתחשבנות הגדולה לפשעי ישראל, ההכרה בריבונותה ובעצמאותה של פלסטין מעלה את השאלה; פלסטין של מי? מה תהיה עתיד פלסטין וישראל?
בעקבות החשבון הגדול, מה תהיינה עתידית ישראל ופלסטין?
אחת התוצאות הברורות והמיידיות של המעשה ההיסטורי הזה של ה-ICC בקריאה לעצור את נתניהו ומשתפי הפעולה שלו ברצח העם היא ההכרה במדינת פלסטין על ידי אירלנד, ספרד ונורבגיה, מה שמותיר את אמריקה ובריטניה בין הסרבנים העיקריים של העולם. עכשיו אני סקרן; איזו ממשלה פלסטינית תקבל את ההכרה הנהדרת הזו? עדיין לא קיים אומה מאוחדת של פלסטין; יש לנו עכשיו אומה מחולקת לבנטוסטנים מודל אפרטהייד על ידי כיבוש ישראלי ושותפות אמריקאית; חמאס שהיא המדינה הלגיטימית של עזה שהיא כבשה לא מישראל אלא מאל-קאעידה, סכסוך בו נלחמתי, ולאחר מכן ניצחתי בבחירות כממשלתו הבלתי מעורערת, מול הגדה המערבית של אש”ף-פתח ומזרח ירושלים בשליטה נומינלית של יורשו. להצהיר על הרשות הפלסטינית ברמאללה, שנפגעת משיתוף הפעולה עם ישראל ומעמדה כמדינת וישי וכן מחוסר נכונות להתעמת עם התוקפנות הישראלית ולהגן על אנשיה צבאית.
יריבים אלה, חמאס והרשות הפלסטינית, מייצגים נכון לעכשיו את המדינות הפלסטיניות בפועל בשטח, שמהן יש לבנות כל פלסטין מאוחדת לגיטימית, אבל המצב מורכב הרבה יותר, עם פלגים רבים ואינטרסים של מעצמות זרות מעורבים. בהתחשב ברציחתו של מנהיג איראן השבוע, כל כך מיומן שאפילו הצל של המתנקש שלו לא הושאר בגאות ההיסטוריה, שילוב חיזבאללה בכל פלסטין חדשה נותר בעייתי. אכן, יהיה לנו מזל גדול אם מעמדה של מלחמת עזה כתיאטרון של מלחמת העולם השלישית והכיבוש האימפריאלי של רוסיה ושליטתה של המזרח התיכון והים התיכון, התלויה הדדית עם בעל בריתה הסכסוך האיראני מול הברית הערבית-אמריקאית. לא לצרוך את כולנו.
למימושה של פלסטין שביטחונה מובטח על ידי האו”ם מפני שוד, חטיפת קרקעות קלפטוקרטית, שעבוד מעין וכיבוש אימפריאלי ושליטה על ידי מדינת ישראל מחוץ לחוק, יש עוד מרחק מה. אבל שוויון ושוויון אמיתיים בין שתי האומות יהיו הרבה יותר מהירים ובטוחים אם עם ישראל ידמיין מחדש ויהפוך את האומה שלו כמוסד של דמוקרטיה וערב לזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו כולל אלה של הפלסטינים ולא סיוט של עריצות ו טרור המדינה כפי שהוא עכשיו.
הפתרון הטוב ביותר לקונפליקט הזה של למעלה משבעים שנה שמקורו בעם אחד המחולק בהיסטוריה בשירות לאלה שישעבדו אותם נשאר פשוט; עמי ישראל ופלסטין מסרבים להרוג זה את זה ומתאחדים בסולידריות נגד המשטרים האוטוריטריים שטוענים ללא לגיטימציה לפעול בשמם. פשוט, כן; אבל לצערי אף פעם לא קל
To delegitimize a state and seize power is simple when its authorities are willing to demonize themselves. This great truth has once again been demonstrated by the settler regime of Netanyahu and his loathsome conspiracy of genocide of the Palestinians, which the International Criminal Court has charged equally with Hamas as war criminals.
Regardless of what happens as a consequence of this ruling, it remains a pinnacle achievement of our idea of civilization and our universal human rights, and this we must celebrate until the end of humankind, which this event has made no longer inevitable.
I warned as the Gaza War began in the wake of Black Saturday that if America sends warships to Israel to help in her conquest of Palestine rather than humanitarian aid, America loses and our enemies win.
Today I wish to revisit that moment, and interrogate whether or not something of our humanity can be clawed back from the darkness.
As I wrote in my post of October 11 2023, Palestine Versus Israel Round Ad Nauseum In An Endless Litany of Woes, Atrocities, and Horrors;
Forward: to my comrades in the Palestinian Resistance:
Hello everyone;
I have some thoughts on the recent events in Gaza, Gaza where I have fought and lost someone I loved, and actions by Hamas whom I have fought alongside and count as my brothers in revolutionary struggle; actions of October 7 or Black Saturday which include the taking of hostages and murder of families, war crimes which have made peace impossible in the near future and have delegitimized the cause of liberation of Palestine by making it ambiguous with dehumanization and atrocities. Such is the nature of power, and of fear weaponized in service to power.
This now is my Resistance in the cause of the peoples of Palestine and Israel, a people divided by history and sectarian theocratic terror; I question the origins and motives of such actions, which trade a tactical goal of demonstrating that Netanyahu’s alt-right monsters cannot deliver the security by which they subjugate Israel, for a strategic one of legitimacy, and will not only weld American support to the tyrant but grant him permission and immunity for the Final Solution of the Palestinian problem he has long dreamed of.
How can we salvage something of our humanity from this?
Herein I invite question, and dreams of a better future than we have the past.
Thank you for hearing me.
Hamas has brought the Chaos to the American Empire and disrupted the legitimation of Israel by the Arab American Alliance versus the Imperial Dominion of Iran, and in reaction to the relentless genocide of the Palestinians by the state of Israel now captured by Netanyahu and his alt right band of thieves.
Here now is the fulcrum of change and reckoning for seventy years of Israeli state terror and imperial conquest in an amoral and loathsome apartheid regime which inverts the values of its founding by becoming the death camps its citizens escaped, and betrays the hope and ideal of a refuge from hate and sectarian division as a reflection of the nazis from whom they have internalized oppression as fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.
Hamas has shattered all of this, potentially, with the myth of state surveillance and control as useful and effective means of subjugation of the slave castes of any state, and the myth of the invincibility and supremacy of Israeli intelligence and military hegemony of which it is a figure of the might of carceral states, tyrannies, and empires, and the calculated reprisals by Israel which will follow are designed by Hamas in this provocation to delegitimize Israel and fracture the solidarity of her allies and collaborators in terror, of which America remains the principal sponsor and villain.
So many of the reactions to this tragedy both here among my friends and in the news media seem baffled, caught in the forks of a classic dilemma in which our heroes and our villains trade places, for in this stunning slave rebellion wherein the victims of genocide and erasure have attacked their masters, the Wretched of the Earth with whom we might normally empathize have violated two of our most cherished moral values and rules of conduct; they are not defending but attacking, which makes justifications for war and the use of social force irrelevant though this ahistorical interpretation of events ignores seventy years of oppression and authorizes the conqueror by classifying the liberation struggle of their victims as terrorism, an argument we can therefore nullify as pro Israeli misdirection and the apologetics of power, and a second and far more serious point; Hamas has taken hostages and killed civilians including children, war crimes which violate our universal human rights and place the perpetrators beyond all laws and all limits.
A friend has written an apology for statements born of compassion which might be confused with support of Israel as a state rather than as a people, a distinction which makes all the difference; and to this I have written the following reply:
There are no good guys in this story, just a people divided by history brutalizing each other with a savagery that threatens our humanity itself. I have fought in Gaza and lost someone there, and from my witness of history I say there is only one kind of truth which does not become a Rashomon Gate when faith is weaponized in service to power by those who would enslave us, and this is true of both sides in this or any war; Who is bleeding? Who is suffering? Who requires acts of grace and mercy?
Not who merits compassion, for often there are no innocent, and as Shaw teaches us in Pygmalion with the iconic speech of Alfred Doolittle this places a moral burden on victims which is unjust; merely who is suffering and needs our help, in this moment, always the only time we have.
Solidarity of action, resistance, and liberation struggle all come after this; Tikkun Olam, a Jewish concept of reparative justice and praxis or the action of values, which I often describe as healing the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.
You have nothing to apologize for; states work very hard to confuse and conflate legitimation of the state with those in whose name it claims to act, using narratives of victimization, for who wears the white hat is a hero and beyond question. All states do this, for it is the nature of power to become centralized as force and control. Among the true horrors of identity politics is awakening to realize that one is the beneficiary of a genocide, of slavery, of patriarchy, of unequal power in any form.
So we are lost in Atherton’s Wilderness of Mirrors; lies, illusions, rewritten histories, falsification. But it is my fate to question all things, and many of them do not bear the test of unbelief.
Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
In this case I question the origins and motives of a blitzkreig which demonstrates the vulnerability of Israel, a tactical objective, at the cost of strategic goals; the immediate results include unifying global support of Israel and dividing the crucial solidarity between the anti-Netanyahu democracy and peace movements within Israel from the liberation struggle of their slave caste, the Palestinians, which was until this disruptive event in the process of becoming one united nation.
Cui Bono? Neither Palestinians nor Israelis, though in the imperial totalitarian state of Israel and its fascisms of blood, faith, and soil they share a common enemy. Netanyahu and his regime benefit, though his promise of security for the people of Israel has been proven illusory and the feared Israeli intelligence and military a paper tiger as Hamas intended; whether this weakens or strengthens his hand is yet to be seen.
Security is an illusion, one convenient for tyrants in the manufacture of consent to be subjugated. In this area of liberation struggle the victory of Hamas in breaching the Wall has been an unambiguous good.
Bring down the Wall, all the walls. Not only the walls of our borders and prisons, but the walls of ideas between peoples most of all. In the long run, only this will bring us peace and a United Humankind.
To make an idea about a kind of people is an act of violence.
No matter where you begin with divisions of belonging and exclusionary otherness, you always end up at the gates of Auschwitz.
Why, O Israel, reproduce the conditions of your historic trauma as the prison guards, with others cast in your former role? Why, when we could be guarantors of each other’s universal human rights in a free society of equals?
Let us emerge from the legacies of our history, and create ourselves anew.
What happens next?
Disruptive and polarizing events often confront us with a choice; who is your white hat and who your black hat in this story? Whose play will you back when they enter the arena at high noon? We will begin to become human when we free ourselves of this tyranny of good and evil, so vulnerable to the lies and misdirection of those who would enslave us and who claim to speak and act in our name, especially in theocracies. For as Voltaire wrote; “Those who can make us believe absurdities can make us commit atrocities”. Gott Mitt Uns; it is the most terrible battlecry, for it authorizes anything.
Today the empire begins to strike back, as Biden declares that America will stand with Israel, with the state in exacting revenge through conquest and not her people in freeing the hostages mind you, in the abominable reprisals Netanyahu promises, having been handed by his enemies immunity and sanction for the Final Solution to the Palestinian Problem he has so long dreamed of. Both this immediate trigger event of Total War as a doctrine created by Hitler and Franco and tested at Guernica and the conditions which created it are consequences of American complicity, for we as a nation have failed to enact the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction policies against Israeli state terror and tyranny which might have prevented it, and if we are to be liberators and not conquerors we must at minimum now pressure Israel to lift the Blockade of Gaza and recognize Hamas as its legitimate government. Let us send humanitarian aid, not armies.
If we send warships to help Israel conquer Palestine, and not humanitarian aid to the Palestinians, America loses and our enemies win.
Netanyahu and Biden have declared intentions to answer force and fear with greater force and fear, as Israel accepts the offer of the moral equivalence of terror by her partner in this dance, Hamas. This will bring not lesser but greater terror, not democracy and a free society of equals but the centralization of power to totalitarian states of force and control. From the perspective of Israel and America or of any state, this is the true purpose of external threats.
As my father once said; “Politics is the art of fear, and fear is the basis of human exchange. Fear is an untrustworthy servant and a terrible master; so, whose instrument will it be?”
Of the recursive forces of fear, power, and force which are the true origin of evil and of its forms as violence, war, and police states, I say to you this one true thing; fear and force cannot answer fear and force. Only love can do this, and the redemptive power of love can free us from the Wagnerian Ring of Power, from falsification, commodification, and dehumanization.
Why are we each others jailors, and not each others liberators?
As written by Andre Damon in the International Committee of the Fourth International’s World Socialist Web Site, in an article entitled International Criminal Court prosecutor charges Netanyahu with “murder” and “extermination” of civilians; “On Monday, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court applied for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan accused the Israeli leaders of presiding over the “murder” and “extermination” of Palestinians, as part of a “common plan to use starvation as a method of war and other acts of violence against the Gazan civilian population as a means to … collectively punish the civilian population of Gaza.”
In announcing the charges, the prosecutor accused Netanyahu and Gallant of “the following war crimes and crimes against humanity”: “Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare as a war crime”; “Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health … or cruel treatment as a war crime”; “Willful killing … or murder as a war crime”; “Extermination and/or murder … including in the context of deaths caused by starvation.”
The prosecutor declared, “We submit that the crimes against humanity charged were committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack against the Palestinian civilian population pursuant to State policy. These crimes, in our assessment, continue to this day.”
In addition to Netanyahu and Gallant, Khan also applied for arrest warrants against leaders of Hamas, which no doubt reflects pressure from the capitalist governments and supporters of Israel. However, the main political significance of the request for warrants is clear: The state of Israel is a criminal regime.
The charges fully vindicate the global mass protests that have erupted over the past seven months, which have been subject to vicious slander from the ruling class and the media. Protesters have been beaten, arrested and accused of “antisemitism” for denouncing and seeking to halt one of the greatest war crimes of the modern period.
Responding to the charges, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared, “With what audacity do you dare to compare the monsters of Hamas to the soldiers of the IDF, the most moral army in the world?”
This “most moral army in the world” has destroyed the majority of houses, schools and hospitals in Gaza, alongside every single university. Its leaders have referred to Gaza’s civilian population as “animals,” declaring, “There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel,” and asserting their intent to carry out collective punishment against an “entire nation.”
Indeed, it is the “most moral army” since Hitler’s Wehrmacht.
The Biden administration responded with its own furious denunciation of the ICC prosecutor’s charges. In a statement, Biden declared:
The ICC prosecutor’s application for arrest warrants against Israeli leaders is outrageous. And let me be clear: whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence—none—between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.
Indeed, there is no equivalence. The Palestinians are living under horrifying conditions of oppression and illegal occupation by Israel. Even if one were to draw an equal sign between the oppressor, Israel, and the oppressed, the Palestininans, Israel has killed 40 Gazans for every Israeli killed in the October 7 attacks.
Biden’s condemnation of the International Criminal Court came less than 24 hours after he spoke at Morehouse College in Georgia, where he declared, “I’ve called for … an immediate ceasefire to stop the fighting.”
But Biden’s response to the prosecutor’s indictment makes it clear that his criticisms of the Netanyahu government are cynical exercises in damage control, aimed at facilitating and enabling the Gaza genocide.
The Biden administration’s efforts to refute the prosecutor’s indictment consist of one absurdity after another.
“The United States has been clear since well before the current conflict that the ICC has no jurisdiction over this matter,” declared State Department spokesman Matthew Miller.
This is not true. In 2021, the International Criminal Court ruled that “the Court can exercise its criminal jurisdiction in the Situation in the State of Palestine,” including both Gaza and the West Bank, following the adoption of the Rome Statute by Palestine in 2015.
Notably, the White House supported ICC proceedings against Russian President Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine war, despite the fact that neither Ukraine nor Russia was a signatory of the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC.
When pressed to answer who does have jurisdiction to say whether Israel is committing war crimes, Miller absurdly replied, “Israel.” That is, the criminals should adjudicate whether or not they are guilty of the crime.
Miller declared that the indictment “could jeopardize ongoing efforts to reach a ceasefire agreement that would get hostages out of Gaza and surge humanitarian assistance.” But Hamas has already accepted the terms proposed by the United States for the release of hostages in exchange for a ceasefire, terms that were rejected by Israel.
Biden was joined by leading officials in both the Democratic and Republican parties in denouncing the prosecutor’s actions. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson threatened to sanction the International Criminal Court, which would itself be a violation of international law.
Aside from defending Israel, the response of US officials expresses the acknowledgement that they are guilty of aiding and supporting all the crimes the prosecutor detailed. Johnson stated this concern explicitly, warning, “If the ICC is allowed to threaten Israeli leaders, ours could be next.”
Indeed, the entire political establishment in the United States, Johnson and Biden included, stands guilty of financing, arming and politically justifying a genocide.
In concluding the indictment, the prosecutor declared:
“If we do not demonstrate our willingness to apply the law equally, if it is seen as being applied selectively, we will be creating the conditions for its collapse …”
This state of affairs is not a distant hypothetical, but an actual fact. The imperialist powers murder and torture all over the world with impunity. They act as a law unto themselves, defying international law at every turn.
While the ICC certainly carries moral weight, it will have no effect on the policies of the imperialist governments. It has been nearly five months since the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to stop killing and starving Palestinian civilians. Since that time, tens of thousands of Palestinians have been murdered, and the entire population has been denied food, water and medical care.
Workers and young people should have no illusions in the United Nations or any other bourgeois institutions of international law to stop the Gaza genocide.
That can only happen through the mass mobilization of the working class, together with young people all over the world, taking the lead in the fight against Zionism, imperialism and the capitalist system.”
As written by Ivana Kottasová and Madalena Araujo for CNN, in an article entitled Exclusive interview: ICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrants against Sinwar and Netanyahu for war crimes over October 7 and Gaza; “The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for Hamas leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the October 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview on Monday.
Khan said the ICC’s prosecution team is also seeking warrants for Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as two other top Hamas leaders — Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri, the leader of the Al Qassem Brigades who is better known as Mohammed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’ political leader.
The move against the Israeli politicians mark the first time the ICC has targeted the top leader of a close ally of the United States. The decision puts Netanyahu in the company of the Russian President Vladimir Putin, for whom the ICC issued an arrest warrant over Moscow’s war on Ukraine, and the Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi, who was facing an arrest warrant from the ICC for alleged crimes against humanity at the time of his capture and killing in October 2011.
By applying for the arrest warrants against Israeli and Hamas leaders in the same action, Khan’s office risks attracting criticism that it places a terror organization and an elected government on an equivalent footing.
A panel of ICC judges will now consider Khan’s application for the arrest warrants.
Khan said the charges against Sinwar, Haniyeh and al-Masri include “extermination, murder, taking of hostages, rape and sexual assault in detention.”
“The world was shocked on the 7th of October when people were ripped from their bedrooms, from their homes, from the different kibbutzim in Israel,” Khan told Amanpour, adding that “people have suffered enormously.”
Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people across several locations in southern Israel on October 7 and took some 250 hostages into Gaza. Many of the hostages are still being held in Gaza – Khan told Amanpour this meant crimes continued to be committed against “so many innocent Israelis … that are held hostage by Hamas and families that are waiting for their return.”
Khan told Amanpour his team has a “variety of evidence” to support the application for arrest warrants against Sinwar, Haniyeh and al-Masri, including authenticated video footage and photographs from the attacks as well as evidence from eyewitnesses and survivors.
Khan said Israel had “every right and indeed an obligation to get hostages back, but you must do so by complying with the law.”
Responding to the announcement by Khan, Hamas said in a statement that it “strongly condemns the attempts of the ICC Prosecutor to equate victims with aggressors by issuing arrest warrants against a number of Palestinian resistance leaders without legal basis.”
“Hamas calls on the ICC Prosecutor to issue arrest warrants against all war criminals among the occupation leaders, officers, and soldiers who participated in crimes against the Palestinian people, and demands the cancellation of all arrest warrants issued against Palestinian resistance leaders,” the group added.
‘Nobody is above the law’
The charges against Netanyahu and Gallant include “causing extermination, causing starvation as a method of war, including the denial of humanitarian relief supplies, deliberately targeting civilians in conflict,” Khan told Amanpour.
“The fact that Hamas fighters need water doesn’t justify denying water from all the civilian population of Gaza,” he added.
More than 35,500 Palestinians have been killed and more than 79,000 wounded in Gaza since October 7, the Ministry of Health in Gaza said on Monday. CNN cannot independently verify the figures.
Netanyahu called the decision “a political outrage.”
“They will not deter us and we will continue in the war until the hostages are released and Hamas is destroyed,” he said at a meeting of the parliamentary group of his Likud party.
Other Israeli officials echoed his sentiments. Benny Gantz, a member Israel’s war cabinet, criticized Khan’s decision immediately after it was announced, saying that Israel was fighting “with one of the strictest moral codes in history, while complying with international law and boasting a robust independent judiciary.”
“Drawing parallels between the leaders of a democratic country determined to defend itself from despicable terror to leaders of a blood-thirsty terror organisation is a deep distortion of justice and blatant moral bankruptcy,” he said, adding that the decision by the prosecutors “is in itself a crime of historic proportion to be remembered for generation.”
The leader of the opposition, Yair Lapid, said the application for the arrest warrents was “a complete moral failure.”
“We cannot accept the outrageous comparison between Netanyahu and Sinwar … We will not remain silent,” he said.
Israel’s President Isaac Herzog called it “beyond outrageous.”
When reports surfaced last month that the ICC chief prosecutor was considering this course of action, Netanyahu said that any ICC arrest warrants against senior Israeli government and military officials “would be an outrage of historic proportions,” and that Israel “has an independent legal system that rigorously investigates all violations of the law.”
Asked by Amanpour about the comments made by Netanyahu, Khan said: “Nobody is above the law.”
He said that if Israel disagrees with the ICC, “they are free, notwithstanding their objections to jurisdiction, to raise a challenge before the judges of the court and that’s what I advise them to do.”
Israel and the United States are not members of the ICC. However, the ICC claims to have jurisdiction over Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank after Palestinian leaders formally agreed to be bound by the court’s founding principles in 2015.
The ICC announcement on Monday is separate from the case that is currently being heard by the the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over an accusation from South Africa that Israel was committing genocide in its war against Hamas following the October 7 attacks.
While the ICJ considers cases that involve countries and nations, and the ICC is a criminal court, which brings cases against individuals for war crimes or crimes against humanity.
Monday’s announcement is not the first time that the ICC acted in relation to Israel. In March 2021, Khan’s office launched an investigation into possible crimes committed in the Palestinian territories since June 2014 in Gaza and the West Bank.
Located in The Hague, Netherlands, and created by a treaty called the Rome Statute first brought before the United Nations, the ICC operates independently. Most countries – 124 of them – are parties to the treaty, but there are notable exceptions, including Israel, the US and Russia.
That means that if the court grants Khan’s application and issues arrest warrants for the five men, any country that is a member would have to arrest them and extradite them to The Hague.
Under the rules of the court, all signatories of the Rome Statute have the obligation to cooperate fully with its decisions. This would make it extremely difficult for Netanyahu and Gallant to travel internationally, including to many countries that are among Israel’s closest allies – including Germany and the United Kingdom.
Sinwar, Haniyeh and al-Masri have been officially designated as global terrorists by the US, meaning they are under travel bans, asset freezes and sanctions. The US, the UK, Japan, Canada as well as the European Union and others have designated Hamas as a terror group and imposed sanctions on its leaders.”
Passing strange that Hamas always sounds like the voice of reason when their words are placed side by side with those of the state of Israel, is it not?
As written by Jo-Ann Mort in The Guardian, in an article entitled The ICC arrest request is a fire alarm for Israel. Will it take heed? This is a moment of extreme crisis for Israel. Resorting to calling the ruling ‘antisemitic’, as Netanyahu did, won’t cut it; “ Regardless of what the final international criminal court decision will be, Israel has entered a new era regarding its relations with its western allies, including the United States. The actions it takes against the Palestinians will no longer go unaccounted for.
This situation was accelerated by the war with Hamas. But the reality is that the international reckoning would have come regardless. That’s because a 57-year occupation of the Palestinian people without a just resolution, coupled with a fascistic, racist government led by the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu – and reinforced by the far-right settler leaders Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and the homeland security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir – cannot play without consequences in polite global company.
It’s remarkable that on the same day as the ICC announcement of a request for arrest warrants for Netanyahu and the defense minister, Yoav Gallant, the Netanyahu government made a move, yet again, to undermine Israeli democracy. The ink on the ICC statement was not even dry before the Israeli communications minister, Shlomo Karhi, a lightweight known to toady to his boss whenever possible, seized reporting equipment from the Associated Press, claiming that it had ignored warnings and was providing news feeds to the now banished Al Jazeera. (He was forced to reverse his decision the same day after fierce US opposition.)
In addition to agreeing to shutter Al Jazeera with the creation of a new Israeli media law (whose legitimacy is being challenged in the Israeli courts), Karhi knows no limits. He has also attempted to dismantle Kan, the Israeli public media outlet, because his boss finds it unsuitable to his personal interests. So far, on that count, he has failed.
Similarly, at the same time that the Netanyahu government raged against the ICC dictate, it allowed renegade thugs to attack trucks on route to Gaza with necessary and urgent food supplies. This has been an ongoing issue in Israel. Netanyahu has refused to halt the raiding of supply trucks by an organized group of rightwing activists, actually aligned politically with Ben-Gvir, the minister in charge of policing, who have taken policy into their own hands by destroying food supplies traveling inside Israel en route to Gaza.
I don’t believe that Israel has a policy of starving Gazans, nor do I believe that Israel – even under this extreme government – and Hamas should be weighed equally. But I can certainly see why some, including the ICC, would accuse Israel of promoting a policy of starvation inside Gaza, based on statements by Gallant, who pronounced at the war’s beginning that he planned for a “complete siege of Gaza”.
The Israeli government must forcibly defend the transfer of needed food supplies.
A competent prime minister – let alone a prime minister who wants to be seen by global allies as responsible, upright and moral – would insist and ensure that these convoys be protected. But then, again, an upright prime minister also wouldn’t continue to allow Ben-Gvir to be part of his government, let alone appoint him in the first place.
Words and actions have consequences.
This is the same government that attempted a judicial coup before October 7 and continues to seek out ways to neuter the Israeli judiciary – one of the mainstays of Israel’s weakened democracy that, at the very least, has provided a backstop against global actions precisely like the ICC action. In the recent past, global institutions and outside nations have been assured that Israel’s high court would override any extreme Israeli government actions.
This is an Israeli government that allows Jewish settlers in the occupied territories in the West Bank to run rampant over civilian Palestinian populations
But not with this government. Instead, one of its key ministers just attended a gathering in Spain of European fascist parties promoting their philosophy to coincide with the upcoming European Union elections, led by well-known personalities such as the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán and the far-right French leader Marine Le Pen, neither a purveyor of a democratic world order or believers in international human rights.
This is an Israeli government that allows Jewish settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories in the West Bank to run rampant over civilian Palestinian populations, destroying crops and property, and endangering innocent civilians, as its government hoards more funds for the settlers, hands out guns to untrained civilians, and refuses to adhere to agreements already signed by Israel to uphold funding and other agreements with the Palestinian Authority.
Meanwhile, even Benny Gantz, considered the realist in the current Israeli war cabinet and a potential rival prime ministerial candidate to Netanyahu, refused to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Palestinian Authority in the ultimatum that he just delivered to Netanyahu about leaving his party’s temporary place in the current Israeli government. He wants Netanyahu to meet certain demands, including formulating a real plan to return the hostages and a day-after scenario for Gaza. But where is the realism in the vision or the demands that will fend off international actions or resolve the existential issue of the occupation? The world is tired of waiting for Israel to offer a credible plan for Gaza – or the West Bank. More nations are announcing that they will recognize an independent Palestinian state.
Any mention of a day after must include the issue of Palestinian freedom. Anyone who has watched the thickening of the Israeli occupation for the past nearly six decades, knew it was just a matter of time before some awful darkness would descend between Israelis and Palestinians to force the hand of the occupation. Clearly, the hideous actions by Hamas of 7 October were not envisioned by almost anyone as the catalyst for where we are today. But here we are.
There must be a strengthening of the Palestinian Authority, and a genuine peace process. Without this, Israel will continue to drift away from the democracy so many Israelis value, desire – and need.
This is a moment of extreme crisis – and the ICC ruling is a fire alarm. Resorting to calling the ruling “antisemitic”, as some Israeli officials – including Netanyahu –have, won’t cut it. Whether the ICC was right or wrong, we have arrived at a moment from which there is no turning back. No one who cares about the future of Israel can stand on the sidelines.”
Tear Down the Wall, by Pink Floyd
International Criminal Court prosecutor charges Netanyahu with “murder” and “extermination” of civilians
23 مايو 2024 المحكمة الجنائية الدولية تتهم قادة إسرائيل وحماس بالتساوي بارتكاب جرائم ضد الإنسانية في حرب غزة
إن نزع الشرعية عن دولة ما والاستيلاء على السلطة أمر بسيط عندما تكون سلطاتها على استعداد لشيطنة نفسها. وقد تجلت هذه الحقيقة العظيمة مرة أخرى من خلال نظام نتنياهو الاستيطاني ومؤامرته البغيضة للإبادة الجماعية للفلسطينيين، والتي اتهمتها المحكمة الجنائية الدولية حماس على قدم المساواة بمجرمي الحرب.
وبغض النظر عما يحدث نتيجة لهذا الحكم، فإنه يظل إنجازًا كبيرًا لفكرتنا عن الحضارة وحقوقنا الإنسانية العالمية، ويجب علينا أن نحتفل بهذا حتى نهاية البشرية، والتي لم يعد هذا الحدث حتميًا بسببها.
لقد حذرت عندما بدأت حرب غزة في أعقاب يوم السبت الأسود من أنه إذا أرسلت أمريكا سفناً حربية إلى إسرائيل لمساعدتها في غزو فلسطين بدلاً من المساعدات الإنسانية، فإن أمريكا تخسر ويفوز أعداؤنا.
أود اليوم أن أعود إلى تلك اللحظة وأتساءل عما إذا كان من الممكن استعادة شيء من إنسانيتنا من الظلام أم لا.
وكما كتبت في رسالتي بتاريخ 11 تشرين الأول/أكتوبر 2023، “فلسطين مقابل إسرائيل في جولة إعلانية عن الغثيان في سلسلة لا نهاية لها من الويلات والفظائع والأهوال؛
وإلى الأمام: إلى رفاقي في المقاومة الفلسطينية:
أهلا بالجميع؛
لدي بعض الأفكار حول الأحداث الأخيرة في غزة، حيث قاتلت وخسرت شخصًا أحببته، وأعمال حماس التي حاربت إلى جانبها وأعتبرها إخوتي في النضال الثوري؛ أعمال 7 أكتوبر أو السبت الأسود والتي تشمل أخذ الرهائن وقتل العائلات، وجرائم الحرب التي جعلت السلام مستحيلاً في المستقبل القريب ونزعت الشرعية عن قضية تحرير فلسطين بجعلها غامضة بالتجريد من الإنسانية والفظائع. هذه هي طبيعة القوة، والخوف الذي يُستخدم كسلاح في خدمة السلطة.
هذه هي الآن مقاومتي من أجل قضية شعبي فلسطين وإسرائيل، شعب قسمه التاريخ والإرهاب الطائفي الثيوقراطي. إنني أتساءل عن أصول ودوافع مثل هذه الأعمال، التي تتاجر بهدف تكتيكي يتمثل في إظهار أن وحوش نتنياهو اليمينية البديلة لا تستطيع توفير الأمن الذي يخضعون به إسرائيل، مقابل هدف استراتيجي للشرعية، ولن يقتصر الأمر على حشد الدعم الأمريكي للطاغية. لكن امنحه الإذن والحصانة للحل النهائي للمشكلة الفلسطينية التي طالما حلم بها.
فكيف يمكننا إنقاذ شيء من إنسانيتنا من هذا؟
وهنا أدعو للتساؤل والأحلام بمستقبل أفضل مما كان لدينا في الماضي.
أشكر لكم لسماع لي.
لقد جلبت حماس الفوضى إلى الإمبراطورية الأمريكية وعطلت شرعية إسرائيل من قبل التحالف العربي الأمريكي ضد السيطرة الإمبراطورية الإيرانية، وكرد فعل على الإبادة الجماعية التي لا هوادة فيها للفلسطينيين على يد دولة إسرائيل التي يسيطر عليها الآن نتنياهو ويمينه البديل. عصابة من اللصوص.
هنا الآن نقطة ارتكاز التغيير والمحاسبة لسبعين عامًا من إرهاب الدولة الإسرائيلية والغزو الإمبراطوري في ظل نظام فصل عنصري غير أخلاقي ومثير للاشمئزاز، والذي يقلب قيم تأسيسها من خلال أن يصبح معسكرات الموت التي هرب منها مواطنوها، ويخون الأمل والمثل الأعلى لدولة إسرائيلية. اللجوء من الكراهية والانقسام الطائفي باعتباره انعكاسًا للنازيين الذين استوعبوا القمع منهم كفاشيات دم وإيمان وتراب.
ربما حطمت حماس كل هذا من خلال أسطورة مراقبة الدولة وسيطرتها كوسيلة مفيدة وفعالة لإخضاع طبقات العبيد في أي دولة، وأسطورة مناعة وتفوق المخابرات الإسرائيلية وهيمنتها العسكرية التي تمثلها. إن هذا الاستفزاز الذي يجسد قوة الدول الاستبدادية والإمبراطوريات، والأعمال الانتقامية المحسوبة من قبل إسرائيل والتي ستتبعها، صممته حماس في هذا الاستفزاز لنزع الشرعية عن إسرائيل وكسر تضامن حلفائها والمتعاونين معها في الإرهاب، والذي تظل أمريكا تمثله. الراعي الرئيسي والشرير.
الكثير من ردود الفعل على هذه المأساة هنا بين أصدقائي وفي وسائل الإعلام تبدو محيرة، عالقة في معضلة كلاسيكية يتبادل فيها أبطالنا وأشرارنا الأماكن، لأنه في تمرد العبيد المذهل هذا حيث ضحايا الإبادة الجماعية والمحو هاجم أسيادهم، معذبو الأرض الذين قد نتعاطف معهم عادة، انتهكوا اثنتين من أعز قيمنا الأخلاقية وقواعد السلوك؛ إنهم لا يدافعون بل يهاجمون، مما يجعل مبررات الحرب واستخدام القوة الاجتماعية غير ذات صلة على الرغم من أن هذا التفسير غير التاريخي للأحداث يتجاهل سبعين عامًا من القمع ويسمح للمحتل بتصنيف النضال التحرري لضحاياه على أنه إرهاب، وهي حجة يمكننا بالتالي وإبطال التضليل المؤيد لإسرائيل والدفاع عن السلطة، ونقطة ثانية وأكثر خطورة بكثير؛ لقد احتجزت حماس رهائن وقتلت مدنيين، بما في ذلك الأطفال، وهي جرائم حرب تنتهك حقوقنا الإنسانية العالمية وتضع مرتكبيها خارج نطاق كل القوانين
جميع الحدود.
لقد كتب أحد الأصدقاء اعتذارًا عن تصريحات نابعة من الرحمة والتي يمكن الخلط بينها وبين دعم إسرائيل كدولة وليس كشعب، وهو تمييز يحدث فرقًا كبيرًا؛ وعلى هذا كتبت الرد التالي:
لا يوجد أشخاص أخيار في هذه القصة، بل مجرد شعب قسمه التاريخ ويتعامل مع بعضهم البعض بوحشية تهدد إنسانيتنا نفسها. لقد قاتلت في غزة وخسرت شخصًا هناك، ومن خلال شهادتي التاريخية أقول إن هناك نوعًا واحدًا فقط من الحقيقة التي لا تصبح بوابة راشومون عندما يتم استخدام الإيمان كسلاح في خدمة السلطة من قبل أولئك الذين يريدون استعبادنا، وهذا هو صحيح بالنسبة لكلا الجانبين في هذه الحرب أو أي حرب أخرى؛ من ينزف؟ من يعاني؟ من يحتاج إلى أعمال النعمة والرحمة؟
ليس من يستحق التعاطف، لأنه في كثير من الأحيان لا يوجد أبرياء، وكما يعلمنا شو في بيجماليون من خلال خطاب ألفريد دوليتل الشهير، فإن هذا يضع عبئًا أخلاقيًا على الضحايا وهو أمر غير عادل؛ فقط من يعاني ويحتاج إلى مساعدتنا، في هذه اللحظة، دائمًا الوقت الوحيد الذي لدينا.
ويأتي بعد ذلك التضامن في العمل والمقاومة والنضال التحرري؛ تيكون أولام، وهو مفهوم يهودي للعدالة التعويضية والتطبيق العملي أو عمل القيم، والذي كثيرًا ما أصفه بأنه شفاء لعيوب إنسانيتنا وانكسارات العالم.
ليس هناك ما يدعوك للاعتذار؛ تعمل الدول جاهدة على الخلط بين شرعية الدولة وخلطها مع أولئك الذين تدعي أنها تتصرف باسمهم، وذلك باستخدام روايات الإيذاء، لأن من يرتدي القبعة البيضاء هو بطل ولا جدال فيه. كل الدول تفعل ذلك، لأن من طبيعة القوة أن تصبح مركزية كقوة وسيطرة. ومن بين الفظائع الحقيقية لسياسات الهوية، الاستيقاظ لإدراك أن المرء هو المستفيد من الإبادة الجماعية، ومن العبودية، والنظام الأبوي، ومن عدم المساواة في السلطة بأي شكل من الأشكال.
لذلك نحن ضائعون في برية المرايا لأثرتون؛ الأكاذيب والأوهام والتاريخ المعاد كتابته والتزييف. لكن قدري هو أن أشكك في كل الأشياء، وكثيرون منهم لا يجتازون اختبار عدم الإيمان.
انتبه دائمًا للرجل الذي يقف خلف الستار.
في هذه الحالة، أتساءل عن أصول ودوافع الحرب الخاطفة التي تظهر ضعف إسرائيل، وهو هدف تكتيكي، على حساب الأهداف الاستراتيجية؛ وتشمل النتائج المباشرة توحيد الدعم العالمي لإسرائيل وتقسيم التضامن الحاسم بين الديمقراطية المناهضة لنتنياهو وحركات السلام داخل إسرائيل عن النضال من أجل تحرير طبقة العبيد، الفلسطينيين، التي كانت حتى هذا الحدث التخريبي في طور التحول إلى وحدة موحدة. أمة.
كوي بونو؟ لا الفلسطينيون ولا الإسرائيليون، على الرغم من أنهم في دولة إسرائيل الشمولية الإمبريالية وفاشية الدم والإيمان والأرض يتقاسمون عدوًا مشتركًا. ويستفيد نتنياهو ونظامه، على الرغم من أن وعده بتوفير الأمن لشعب إسرائيل قد ثبت أنه وهم، وأن المخابرات الإسرائيلية والجيش الإسرائيلي المخيف هو نمر من ورق كما أرادت حماس؛ ولم يتضح بعد ما إذا كان هذا يضعف يده أو يقويها.
فالأمن وهم، وهو الوهم المناسب للطغاة في صناعة الموافقة على الخضوع. وفي منطقة كفاح التحرير هذه، كان انتصار حماس في اختراق الجدار بمثابة خير لا لبس فيه.
هدم الجدار، كل الجدران. ليست فقط جدران حدودنا وسجوننا، بل جدران الأفكار بين الشعوب قبل أي شيء آخر. وعلى المدى الطويل، هذا وحده هو الذي سيجلب لنا السلام والبشرية المتحدة.
إن تكوين فكرة عن نوع من الناس هو عمل من أعمال العنف.
بغض النظر عن المكان الذي تبدأ فيه تقسيمات الانتماء والاختلاف الاستبعادي، سينتهي بك الأمر دائمًا على أبواب أوشفيتز.
لماذا تعيدين يا إسرائيل إنتاج ظروف صدمتك التاريخية كحراس السجن، مع آخرين في دورك السابق؟ لماذا، عندما يكون بوسعنا أن نكون ضامنين لحقوق الإنسان العالمية لبعضنا البعض في مجتمع حر متساوٍ؟
دعونا نخرج من تراث تاريخنا، ونخلق أنفسنا من جديد.
ماذا حدث بعد ذلك؟
إن الأحداث التخريبية والاستقطابية غالبا ما تضعنا أمام خيارين؛ من هي قبعتك البيضاء ومن قبعتك السوداء في هذه القصة؟ من ستعود إلى مسرحيته عندما يدخلون الساحة عند الظهيرة؟ سوف نبدأ في التحول إلى بشر عندما نحرر أنفسنا من طغيان الخير والشر، ونصبح عرضة للأكاذيب والتضليل من جانب أولئك الذين يريدون استعبادنا والذين يدعون أنهم يتحدثون ويتصرفون باسمنا، وخاصة في الأنظمة الثيوقراطية. فكما كتب فولتير؛ “أولئك الذين يجعلوننا نصدق السخافات يمكنهم أن يجعلونا نرتكب الفظائع”. جوت ميت أونس؛ إنها أفظع صرخة معركة، لأنها تسمح بأي شيء.
اليوم تبدأ الإمبراطورية في الرد، حيث أعلن بايدن أن أمريكا ستقف إلى جانب إسرائيل، مع الدولة في الانتقام من خلال الغزو وليس مع شعبها في تحرير الرهائن، في الأعمال الانتقامية الشنيعة التي وعد بها نتنياهو، بعد أن نفذها أعداؤه. الحصانة والعقوبات من أجل الحل النهائي للمشكلة الفلسطينية الذي طالما حلم به. كل من هذا الثلاثي الفوري
الحدث الأكبر للحرب الشاملة كعقيدة أنشأها هتلر وفرانكو وتم اختبارها في غرنيكا والظروف التي خلقتها هي عواقب التواطؤ الأمريكي، لأننا كأمة فشلنا في تفعيل سياسات المقاطعة وسحب الاستثمارات وفرض العقوبات ضد إرهاب الدولة الإسرائيلية والطغيان الذي كان من الممكن أن يمنع ذلك، وإذا أردنا أن نكون محررين وليس غزاة، فيجب علينا على الأقل أن نضغط الآن على إسرائيل لرفع الحصار عن غزة والاعتراف بحماس كحكومة شرعية لها. دعونا نرسل المساعدات الإنسانية، وليس الجيوش.
إذا أرسلنا سفنا حربية لمساعدة إسرائيل في غزو فلسطين، وليس المساعدات الإنسانية للفلسطينيين، فإن أمريكا تخسر ويفوز أعداؤنا.
لقد أعلن نتنياهو وبايدن عن نيتهما الرد على القوة والخوف بمزيد من القوة والخوف، حيث تقبل إسرائيل عرض التكافؤ الأخلاقي للإرهاب الذي تقدم به شريكتها في هذه الرقصة، حماس. وهذا لن يجلب إرهابًا أقل بل أعظم، ولن يجلب الديمقراطية ومجتمعًا حرًا متساويًا، بل مركزية السلطة في أيدي الدول الشمولية للقوة والسيطرة. ومن وجهة نظر إسرائيل وأمريكا أو أي دولة، هذا هو الهدف الحقيقي للتهديدات الخارجية.
وكما قال والدي ذات مرة؛ “السياسة هي فن الخوف، والخوف هو أساس التبادل الإنساني. الخوف خادم غير جدير بالثقة وسيد رهيب. إذن، من ستكون أداة؟
من بين قوى الخوف والقوة والقوة المتكررة التي هي الأصل الحقيقي للشر وأشكاله مثل العنف والحرب والدول البوليسية، أقول لك هذا الشيء الحقيقي الوحيد؛ الخوف والقوة لا يمكنهما الرد على الخوف والقوة. الحب وحده يستطيع أن يفعل هذا، وقوة الحب الخلاصية يمكنها أن تحررنا من خاتم القوة الفاغنري، ومن التزييف، والتسليع، والتجريد من الإنسانية.
لماذا كل منا سجان بعضنا البعض، ولسنا محررين بعضنا البعض؟
Hebrew
3 במאי 2024 בית הדין הפלילי הבינלאומי מאשים את מנהיגי ישראל וחמאס באותה מידה עם פשעים נגד האנושות במלחמת עזה
לעשות דה-לגיטימציה למדינה ולתפוס את השלטון זה פשוט כאשר הרשויות שלה מוכנות לעשות דמוניזציה לעצמן. האמת הגדולה הזו הוכחה שוב על ידי משטר המתנחלים של נתניהו וקנוניה המתועבת שלו לרצח עם של הפלסטינים, שבית הדין הפלילי הבינלאומי האשים אותו באותה מידה עם חמאס כפושעי מלחמה.
ללא קשר למה שקורה כתוצאה מפסיקה זו, הוא נותר הישג השיא של רעיון הציוויליזציה שלנו וזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו, ואת זה עלינו לחגוג עד לסוף המין האנושי, שאירוע זה הפך כבר לא בלתי נמנע.
הזהרתי כשהחלה מלחמת עזה בעקבות השבת השחורה שאם אמריקה תשלח ספינות מלחמה לישראל כדי לסייע בכיבוש פלסטין במקום סיוע הומניטרי, אמריקה מפסידה והאויבים שלנו מנצחים.
היום אני רוצה לחזור על הרגע הזה, ולחקור אם משהו מהאנושיות שלנו ניתן להחזיר מהחושך או לא.
כפי שכתבתי בפוסט שלי מ-11 באוקטובר 2023, פלסטין נגד ישראל סבב עד Nauseum בסימן אינסופי של צער, זוועות וזוועות;
קדימה: לחבריי בהתנגדות הפלסטינית:
שלום לכולם;
יש לי כמה מחשבות על האירועים האחרונים בעזה, עזה שבהם נלחמתי ואיבדתי מישהו שאהבתי, ופעולות של חמאס שנלחמתי לצדם ונחשב כאחים שלי במאבק מהפכני; פעולות של ה-7 באוקטובר או השבת השחורה הכוללות לקיחת בני ערובה ורצח משפחות, פשעי מלחמה שהפכו את השלום לבלתי אפשרי בעתיד הקרוב ועשו דה-לגיטימציה לסיבת שחרור פלסטין על ידי הפיכתה לדו-משמעית עם דה-הומניזציה וזוועות. כזה הוא טבעו של כוח ושל פחד מנשק בשירות לשלטון.
זוהי כעת ההתנגדות שלי למען עמי פלסטין וישראל, עם מפולג על ידי היסטוריה וטרור תיאוקרטי עדתי; אני מטיל ספק במקורות ובמניעים של פעולות כאלה, שסחרות במטרה טקטית להדגים שמפלצות הימין של נתניהו אינן יכולות לספק את הביטחון שבאמצעותו הן מכפיפות את ישראל, למען ביטחון אסטרטגי של לגיטימיות, ולא רק יחברו את התמיכה האמריקאית בעריץ. אבל תן לו רשות וחסינות לפתרון הסופי של הבעיה הפלסטינית שעליה חלם זמן רב.
איך נוכל להציל משהו מהאנושיות שלנו מזה?
כאן אני מזמין שאלות וחלומות על עתיד טוב יותר ממה שהיה לנו בעבר.
תודה ששמעת אותי.
חמאס הביא את הכאוס לאימפריה האמריקאית ושיבש את הלגיטימציה של ישראל על ידי הברית הערבית-אמריקאית מול השליטה האימפריאלית של איראן, ובתגובה לרצח העם הבלתי פוסק של הפלסטינים על ידי מדינת ישראל שנכבשה כעת על ידי נתניהו והאלטרנטיבה שלו. להקת גנבים.
כאן נמצא כעת נקודת המשען של השינוי והחשבון לשבעים שנות טרור מדינת ישראל וכיבוש אימפריאלי במשטר אפרטהייד מוסרי ותועב, אשר הופך את ערכי הקמתו על ידי הפיכתו למחנות ההשמדה שאזרחיו נמלטו ממנו, ומסגיר את התקווה והאידיאל של מפלט משנאה ומפילוג עדתי כהשתקפות של הנאצים שמהם הפנימו את הדיכוי כפשיזם של דם, אמונה ואדמה.
חמאס ניפץ את כל זה, פוטנציאלית, עם מיתוס הפיקוח והשליטה של המדינה כאמצעי שימושי ויעיל להכנעה של עדות העבדים של כל מדינה, ומיתוס הבלתי מנוצחים והעליונות של המודיעין וההגמוניה הצבאית הישראלים. דמות של עוצמתן של מדינות קרסראליות, עריצות ואימפריות, ופעולות התגמול המחושבות של ישראל שיבואו בעקבותיהן מתוכננות על ידי חמאס בפרובוקציה זו לעשות דה-לגיטימציה לישראל ולשבור את הסולידריות של בעלות בריתה ומשתפי פעולה בטרור, שאמריקה נותרה בה. ספונסר ראשי ונבל.
כל כך הרבה מהתגובות לטרגדיה הזו הן כאן בין חברי והן בתקשורת נראות מבולבלות, נתפסות במזלגות של דילמה קלאסית שבה הגיבורים שלנו והנבלים שלנו מחליפים מקום, בעבור מרד העבדים המדהים הזה שבו קורבנות רצח העם והמחיקה תקפו את אדוניהם, עלובי כדור הארץ שבדרך כלל אנו עשויים להזדהות עימם הפרו שניים מערכי המוסר וכללי ההתנהגות היקרים ביותר שלנו; הם אינם מגנים אלא תוקפים, מה שהופך את ההצדקות למלחמה ושימוש בכוח חברתי ללא רלוונטיות אף שהפרשנות הא-היסטורית הזו של אירועים מתעלמת משבעים שנות דיכוי ומסמיכה את הכובש על ידי סיווג מאבק השחרור של קורבנותיהם כטרור, טיעון שאנו יכולים לפיכך לבטל כפרו את הכיוון הישראלי המוטעה ואת האפולוגטיקה של הכוח, ונקודה שנייה וחמורה הרבה יותר; חמאס לקח בני ערובה והרג אזרחים כולל ילדים, פשעי מלחמה שמפרים את זכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו ומציבים את העבריינים מעבר לכל החוקים
כל הגבולות.
חבר כתב התנצלות על אמירות שנולדו מחמלה שעלולות להתבלבל עם תמיכה בישראל כמדינה ולא כעם, הבחנה שעושה את כל ההבדל; ועל כך כתבתי את התשובה הבאה:
אין בחורים טובים בסיפור הזה, רק עם המחולק על ידי ההיסטוריה המתאכזרים אחד את השני בפראות שמאיימת על האנושות שלנו עצמה. נלחמתי בעזה ואיבדתי שם מישהו, ומעדי ההיסטוריה אני אומר שיש רק סוג אחד של אמת שלא הופך לשער ראשומון כאשר האמונה מנשקת בשירות השלטון על ידי אלה שישעבדו אותנו, וזוהי נכון לשני הצדדים במלחמה זו או בכל מלחמה; מי מדמם? מי סובל? מי דורש מעשי חסד ורחמים?
לא מי שזוכה לחמלה, כי לעתים קרובות אין חפים מפשע, וכפי שמלמד אותנו שואו בפיגמליון עם נאומו האיקוני של אלפרד דוליטל, הדבר מטיל נטל מוסרי על הקורבנות שאינו צודק; רק מי שסובל וזקוק לעזרתנו, ברגע זה, תמיד הזמן היחיד שיש לנו.
סולידריות של פעולה, התנגדות ומאבק לשחרור כולם באים אחרי זה; תיקון עולם, מושג יהודי של צדק ופרקסיס מתקן או פעולת ערכים, אותו אני מתאר לא פעם כמרפא את פגמי האנושות שלנו ואת שברו של העולם.
אין לך על מה להתנצל; מדינות עובדות קשה מאוד כדי לבלבל ולערבב בין הלגיטימציה של המדינה לבין אלה שבשמם היא מתיימרת לפעול, תוך שימוש בנרטיבים של קורבנות, שכן מי שחובש את הכובע הלבן הוא גיבור ומעבר למחלוקת. כל המדינות עושות זאת, שכן טבעו של כוח להתרכז ככוח ושליטה. בין הזוועות האמיתיות של פוליטיקת זהויות יש להתעורר ולהבין שאדם הוא הנהנה מרצח עם, מעבדות, מפטריארכיה, מכוח לא שוויוני בכל צורה שהיא.
אז אנחנו אבודים במדבר המראות של את’רטון; שקרים, אשליות, היסטוריות משוכתבות, זיוף. אבל גורלי הוא להטיל ספק בכל הדברים, ורבים מהם אינם עומדים במבחן חוסר האמונה.
תמיד שימו לב לאיש שמאחורי הווילון.
במקרה זה אני מטיל ספק במקורותיו ובמניעים של בזק המדגים את פגיעותה של ישראל, מטרה טקטית, במחיר של יעדים אסטרטגיים; התוצאות המיידיות כוללות איחוד תמיכה עולמית בישראל וחלוקת הסולידריות המכרעת בין תנועות הדמוקרטיה האנטי-נתניהו ותנועות השלום בתוך ישראל ממאבק השחרור של קאסטת העבדים שלהם, הפלסטינים, שהיה עד לאירוע מפריע זה בתהליך של הפיכה מאוחדת אחת. אוּמָה.
קוי בונו? לא פלסטינים ולא ישראלים, אף שבמדינת ישראל הטוטליטרית האימפריאלית ובפשיזם הדם, האמונה והאדמה שלה הם חולקים אויב משותף. נתניהו ומשטרו מרוויחים, אף שהבטחתו לביטחון לעם ישראל הוכחה כהזויה והמודיעין והצבא הישראלי החשש הוא נמר נייר כפי שהתכוון חמאס; אם זה מחליש או מחזק את ידו עדיין לא נראה.
אבטחה היא אשליה, כזו שנוחה לרודנים בייצור הסכמה להכפפה. בתחום זה של מאבק שחרור ניצחונו של חמאס בפריצת החומה היה טוב חד משמעי.
תוריד את החומה, את כל החומות. לא רק חומות הגבולות והכלא שלנו, אלא חומות הרעיונות בין העמים יותר מכל. בטווח הארוך, רק זה יביא לנו שלום ומין אנושי מאוחד.
ליצור רעיון על סוג של אנשים זה מעשה אלימות.
לא משנה היכן אתה מתחיל עם חלוקות של שייכות ואחרות מוציאה מהכלל, אתה תמיד מגיע בשערי אושוויץ.
מדוע, הו ישראל, לשחזר את תנאי הטראומה ההיסטורית שלך כסוהרים, כשאחרים מלוהקים לתפקידך הקודם? למה, כשיכולנו להיות ערבים לזכויות האדם האוניברסליות זה של זה בחברה חופשית של שווים?
בואו נצא מהמורשת של ההיסטוריה שלנו, וניצור את עצמנו מחדש.
מה קורה לאחר מכן?
אירועים משבשים ומקטבים מעמתים אותנו לעתים קרובות עם בחירה; מי הכובע הלבן שלך ומי הכובע השחור שלך בסיפור הזה? משחק של מי תחזור כשהם ייכנסו לזירה בצהריים? נתחיל להיות אנושיים כאשר נשחרר את עצמנו מהעריצות הזו של טוב ורע, הפגיעים כל כך לשקרים והכוונה שגויה של אלה שישעבדו אותנו ואשר מתיימרים לדבר ולפעול בשמנו, במיוחד בתיאוקרטיות. שכן כפי שכתב וולטייר; “אלה שיכולים לגרום לנו להאמין באבסורדים יכולים לגרום לנו לבצע זוועות”. גוט מיט אונס; זו זעקת הקרב הנוראה ביותר, שכן היא מאשרת כל דבר.
היום האימפריה מתחילה להכות בחזרה, כשביידן מכריז שאמריקה תעמוד לצד ישראל, כשהמדינה תנקום באמצעות כיבוש ולא אנשיה בשחרור בני הערובה, שימו לב, בפעולות התגמול המתועבות שנתניהו מבטיח, לאחר שנמסרו על ידי אויביו. חסינות וסנקציה לפתרון הסופי לבעיה הפלסטינית שעליה חלם כל כך הרבה זמן. הן הטרייה המיידית הזו
אירוע גדול של מלחמה טוטאלית כדוקטרינה שנוצרה על ידי היטלר ופרנקו ונבדקה בגרניקה והתנאים שיצרו אותה הם תוצאות של שותפות אמריקאית, שכן אנחנו כאומה לא הצלחנו לחוקק את מדיניות החרם, ההסרה והסנקציה נגד טרור מדינת ישראל. ועריצות שאולי הייתה מונעת זאת, ואם אנחנו רוצים להיות משחררים ולא כובשים, עלינו לפחות עכשיו ללחוץ על ישראל להסיר את המצור על עזה ולהכיר בחמאס כממשלתו הלגיטימית. בואו נשלח סיוע הומניטרי, לא צבאות.
אם נשלח ספינות מלחמה לעזור לישראל לכבוש את פלסטין, ולא סיוע הומניטרי לפלסטינים, אמריקה מפסידה והאויבים שלנו מנצחים.
נתניהו וביידן הצהירו על כוונות לענות על כוח ופחד בעוצמה ובפחד רב יותר, שכן ישראל נעתרת להצעת השוויון המוסרי של טרור מצד בן זוגה לריקוד זה, חמאס. זה לא יביא טרור קטן יותר אלא גדול יותר, לא דמוקרטיה וחברה חופשית של שווים אלא ריכוז הכוח למדינות טוטליטריות של כוח ושליטה. מנקודת המבט של ישראל ואמריקה או של כל מדינה, זו המטרה האמיתית של איומים חיצוניים.
כמו שאבי אמר פעם; “פוליטיקה היא אמנות הפחד, והפחד הוא הבסיס לחילופי דברים אנושיים. הפחד הוא משרת לא אמין ואדון נורא; אז, של מי הכלי זה יהיה?”
מבין הכוחות הרקורסיבים של פחד, כוח וכוח שהם המקור האמיתי של הרוע ושל צורותיו כאלימות, מלחמה ומדינות משטרה, אני אומר לכם את הדבר האמיתי האחד הזה; פחד וכוח אינם יכולים לענות על פחד וכוח. רק אהבה יכולה לעשות זאת, והכוח הגואל של האהבה יכול לשחרר אותנו מטבעת הכוח הווגנרית, מזיוף, סחורה ודה-הומניזציה.
The Revolution comes to Kanaky, as France moves to reclaim her former colony by granting voting rights to her own citizens at the expense of self-rule by the indigenous Kanak people, who are resisting first with protest, and now with fire and fury in direct action and anticolonial struggle.
Fire catches.
In Kanaky, Haiti, West Papua, East Timor, Palestine and Israel, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, Thailand, Burma, Sri Lanka, the Philippine Islands, Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Kashmir and India, and allied movements in Russia and the many theatres of her imperial conquest and dominion in World War Three including Ukraine and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, the Mediterranean, and Africa, and the Dominion of Iran which includes Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, the fires of liberation struggle rage and consume the legacies of our history in unequal power and systems of oppression. And the Revolution is not only ongoing in all of these nations, but among them as well, for all are members of networks of alliance which will one day transform our world as a United Humankind.
Guillermo del Toro, in his magnificent epic of migration and racial equality Carnival Row, has a scene in which two young successors to leadership of traditionally rival factions find themselves in love and in need of allies in a subplot which reimages Romeo and Juliet; the rebellious hellion Jonah Breakspear asks his Machiavellian lover Sophie Longerbane, “Who is chaos good for?” To which she replies, “Chaos is good for us. Chaos is the great hope of the powerless.”
Let us bring the Chaos.
As written by Julien Mazzoni in The Guardian, in an article entitled ‘We will fight until Kanaky is free’: how New Caledonia caught fire: The frustration that erupted into deadly violence in the French territory last week has been building for years; “In the middle of the main road in Rivière-Salée, north of Nouméa, sits a burnt-out car. After days of rioting, young men with masked faces wave a Kanak flag as vehicles pass. All around is desolation. Shops with gutted fronts, burnt buildings, debris on the pavements and roads. Gangs of young people roam the area.
The violence that erupted last week is the worst in New Caledonia since unrest involving independence activists gripped the French Pacific territory in the 1980s.
Anger over France’s plan to impose new voting rules swelled in the archipelago of 270,000 people. The plan would expand the right of French residents living in New Caledonia to vote provincial elections, which some fear would dilute the indigenous Kanak vote. Kanaks make up about 40% of the population.
The images flooding out of Nouméa have been alarming: black smoke billowing above the capital as cars, shops and buildings were set alight. Rioters angry with the electoral change have also set up road barricades, cutting off access to medicine and food. On 15 May, a state of emergency was declared for 12 days and a nationwide curfew remains in place.
Hundreds of military and armed police have been deployed to restore order and keep the peace. As of Friday, five had been killed, including two police officers. The three other people were Kanaks.
On Friday, local authorities said the situation was “calmer”, after hundreds more French marines began arriving.
However, despite appeals for calm from political groups – in particular, the pro-independence parties most angered by the planned voting change – unrest has continued to be reported.
“We don’t want to let our people disappear, we’ll fight until Kanaky is free,” say two rioters, who did not want to be named. They stood near a roundabout in the New Caledonia capital, Noumea, as a vehicle burned.
The men, aged in their 20s, clash with police but say they hold back from vandalism.
“We don’t loot the shops, we try to tell the younger brothers not to do that, not to set fires, but they don’t listen to anyone any more,” one says.
In the southern districts of the city, where mostly Europeans live, fear dominates. People have organised themselves into collectives and set up barricades to defend their homes. Many have guns.
Jérôme’s family has lived in New Caledonia for several generations. He lives in the Sainte-Marie district and is married to a Kanak woman. He says his heart is broken.
“The neighbours have gone mad, they’re armed and ready to shoot, and I’m trying to calm them down. How are we going to get back together after that?” he says.
The frustration that erupted into deadly violence this week has been building for years. The proposed change to electoral law marks the latest flashpoint in long-running tensions over France’s role in the island.
Although New Caledonia has on three occasions rejected independence in referendums, the cause retains strong support among the Kanak people, whose ancestors have lived on the islands for thousands of years. The third referendum, held in 2021, remains contested by pro-independence groups, who had sought to postpone the vote due to the Covid crisis. It nevertheless went ahead and was boycotted by independence groups. This has contributed to rising discontent ever since.
Colonised by France in the second half of the 19th century, New Caledonia has special status with some local powers that have been transferred from Paris.
French lawmakers this week pushed forward plans to allow outsiders who moved to New Caledonia at least 10 years ago to vote in the territory’s elections. Pro-independence forces say that would weaken the Kanak vote.
The proposal must still be approved by both houses of the French parliament later this year. The president, Emmanuel Macron, has said French lawmakers will vote to adopt the constitutional change by the end of June, unless New Caledonia’s opposing sides can strike a new deal.
Opposition to the voting changes within the French territory has been building for months. The Field Action Co-ordination Cell (CCAT) created last November has been driving the protest movement. It is an offshoot of Union Calédonienne, the radical fringe of the pro-independence FLNKS party.
Fiercely opposed to the French interior minister Gérald Darmanin’s proposed constitutional reform that aims to enlarge the electorate – and disappointed by the inability of pro-independence politicians to make their voices heard – it has been mobilising young people in working-class neighbourhoods for several months.
When the CCAT called for people to mobilise against the electoral law change in April, tens of thousands of people – including many young people – flocked from across the territory to march through the streets of Nouméa.
In a country marked by inequality, where much of the population is young, the message is appealing. New Caledonia has mineral resources – it is one of the world’s largest nickel producers – but wealth is spread unevenly.
Despite attempts to reduce gaps in equality and improve access to employment, Kanak people remain under-represented in positions of power and responsibility.
Kanak people typically have lower levels of education than non-indigenous Caledonians. They are also make up large numbers of the prison population – which has helped fuel a sense of frustration, particularly among young Kanaks living in urban areas.
France’s justice minister, Eric Dupond-Moretti, has called on prosecutors to “take the strongest possible action against the perpetrators of the violence”, while a local business group estimated the damage, concentrated around Noumea, at €200m.
Thierry de Greslan, a representative from the hospital in Noumea, said he was predominantly concerned for his patients amid the deteriorating situation.
“We estimate that three or four people may have died due to lack of access to medical care,” he said, adding that there was a difficulty getting patients and healthcare works to the facility due to road blocks.
With the hospital’s operating rooms running around the clock and his staff prepared for any crisis, De Greslan said his concern was for future.
“We are in an urban guerrilla situation with nightly gunshot wounds,” he said. “We are ready to face this.”
As written in The Guardian in an article entitled Why is there unrest in New Caledonia? Everything you need to know: Deadly riots spiralled into wider crisis over constitutional voting changes to increase number of French nationals eligible to vote in Pacific territory; Deadly violence has paralysed New Caledonia, a French overseas territory in the South Pacific, for more than a week after lawmakers in Paris approved a constitutional amendment to allow recent arrivals to the territory to vote in provincial elections.
The amendment, which some local leaders fear will dilute the vote of the Indigenous Kanak people, is the latest flashpoint in a decades-long tussle over France’s role in the island.
At least six people have died in the protests, which has prompted authorities to shut the international airport and schools and impose a curfew in the capital, Nouméa, where businesses and vehicles have been set alight.
France has launched a major security operation in a bid to quell the violence, and this week Australia and New Zealand are sending government planes to evacuate their nationals.
Where is New Caledonia?
Located in the warm waters of the south-west Pacific, 930 miles (1,500km) east of Australia, New Caledonia is home to 270,000 people, 41% of whom are Melanesian Kanaks and 24% of European origin, mostly French.
The archipelago was named by the British explorer Capt James Cook in 1774. It was annexed by France in 1853 and was used as a penal colony until shortly before the turn of the 20th century.
Why does it matter to France?
New Caledonia, one of five island territories spanning the Indo-Pacific held by France, is central to Emmanuel Macron’s plan to increase French influence in the Pacific.
The world’s No 3 nickel producer, New Caledonia lies at the heart of a geopolitically complex maritime region, where China and the US are jostling for power and influence in security and trade. Without naming China, the French president has previously said France’s drive to expand its influence in the Pacific was to ensure a “rules-based development”.
What is its history with France?
After France’s colonisation in the 19th century, New Caledonia officially became a French overseas territory in 1946. Starting in the 1970s, after a nickel boom that drew outsiders, tensions rose on the island, with various conflicts between Paris and Kanak independence movements.
A 1998 Nouméa accord helped end the conflict by outlining a path to gradual autonomy and restricting voting to the Kanak and migrants living in New Caledonia before 1998. The accord allowed for three referendums to determine the future of the country. In all three, independence was rejected.
Why have tensions exploded recently?
Under the terms of the Nouméa accord, voting in provincial elections was restricted to people who had resided in New Caledonia before 1998, and their children. The measure was aimed at giving greater representation to the Kanaks, who had become a minority population.
Paris has come to view the arrangement as undemocratic, and lawmakers approved a constitutional amendment to open up the electorate to include people who have lived in New Caledonia for at least 10 years.
Macron has said he would delay rubber-stamping it into law and invite representatives of the territory’s population to Paris for talks to reach a negotiated settlement. However, he said a new agreement must be reached by June or he would sign it into law.”
In the glorious struggle for liberation, one must begin by Bringing the Chaos and becoming ungovernable to create the conditions for change. And as I have written often, all Resistance is war to the knife, for those who would enslave us and who respect no laws and no limits may hide behind none.
As written by Helen Livingstone in The Guardian, in an article entitled Like a ‘civil war’: Nouméa residents describe terror as deadly riots sweep New Caledonia capital: Some locals say they have been too scared to leave their homes as protests over changes to the voting law grew into deadly riots; “Lizzie Carboni knew that life in New Caledonia had changed forever when the school she had attended as a child went up in flames on Wednesday night.
“I could hear people yelling, screaming and grenades being fired,” she says, adding that it was “the worst night of my life” and likening the scenes unfolding in the capital, Nouméa, to “civil war”.
Carboni lives in the residential neighbourhood of Portes de Fer and has watched as waves of violence have gripped the country this week, and protests over changes to a voting law grew into riots.
Now, armoured vehicles patrol the streets of the city, and locals describe being afraid to leave their homes.
Burnt detritus amassed over four days of unrest is scattered on Nouméa’s palm-lined major thoroughfares, which are usually thronged with tourists. Fist-size chunks of rock and cement that appeared to have been flung during riots lie on the ground.
In the wake of the violence, Paris has deployed troops to the French territory’s ports and international airport, banned TikTok and imposed a state of emergency. Four people, including a police officer, have died in the clashes and hundreds have been wounded.
Carboni, a freelance journalist, is horrified.
“We have bags ready if we need to leave our home for whatever reason,” she says, adding that local supermarkets had been looted and that she and her family were relying on the food they had remaining in their pantry. “We were, and are still, terrified by what’s happening.
“Life will never be the same from now on. It will take months and months to rebuild everything, if it can be done at all,” she says.
Speaking to broadcaster France Info on Wednesday, Anne Clément, another Nouméa resident, hailed security forces reinforcements, saying the unrest had morphed into “a real urban guerrilla war”.
People have been confined to their homes, terrified by “shooting from all sides”, Clément, a nursery director, told the broadcaster. “We’ve stopped eating, we’ve stopped living, we’ve stopped sleeping,” she added. “I don’t see how we could get out of the situation without the state of emergency.”
Another resident, Yoan Fleurot, told Reuters in a Zoom interview that he was staying at home out of respect for the nightly curfew and was very scared for his family.
“I don’t see how my country can recover after this”, Fleurot said.
Residents in some neighbourhoods strung up improvised white flags, a symbol of their intention to keep peaceful watch over the streets.
French broadcaster La Première posted footage on Twitter showing a supermarket in the town of Dumbéa, next to the capital, which it said had been looted on Wednesday night. Elsewhere, residents formed queues outside petrol stations and supermarkets in a bid to find supplies.
One woman said she felt she had been forced to take food from shops. “We just grabbed what there was in the shops to eat. Soon there will be no more shops,” she said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We need milk for the children. I don’t see it as looting,” she told AFP.
The pro-independence, largely Indigenous protests were sparked by planned changes to voting laws that will allow more long-term French residents of the islands to vote in local elections. The move has sparked fears among the indigenous Kanak population that their influence will be further diluted.
The protests turned violent this week as the bill was voted on in the French parliament. The reforms must still be approved by a joint sitting of both houses of the French parliament.
“A few days ago, we were going out, sitting at cafes, laughing together but in just a few hours, everything changed,” Carboni says.
“The future is uncertain for everybody. What will tomorrow be like?”
Where Revolution blossoms, forces of reaction follow. As written in The Guardian in an article entitled French forces launch ‘major operation’ in New Caledonia, as unrest claims another life; Operation will aim to retake road linking airport with Noumea, as the capital’s mayor says the situation is ‘not improving’; “French forces have launched a “major operation” to regain control of a road linking New Caledonia’s capital Noumea to the main international airport, as another person was killed in a sixth night of violent unrest.
Officials said more than 600 heavily armed gendarmes were dispatched to secure Route Territoriale 1, the main road connecting the capital with the airport. Flights to and from New Caledonia’s main island have been cancelled since the unrest began, stranding travellers and cutting off trade routes.
French interior minister Gérald Darmanin said “a major operation of more than 600 gendarmes” was being launched “aimed at completely regaining control of the 60 kilometre main road” and allowing the airport to reopen.
On Saturday, Noumea’s mayor, Sonia Lagarde, said that while overnight violence has eased somewhat, thanks to a 6pm to 6am curfew, “we are far from a return to normal.”
“The situation is not improving – quite the contrary – despite all the appeals for calm,” she said, describing Noumea as “under siege.”
“The damage is incredible … It’s a spectacle of desolation.”
For almost a week, the usually calm oceanside city has been convulsed with violence.
On Saturday, a sixth person was killed, after an exchange of fire at one of the many impromptu barricades blocking roads on the island, a security official told the AP news agency. Two other people were seriously injured in the clash, French media reported.
Two gendarmes and three other people, Indigenous Kanaks, have also been killed.
The unrest has been blamed on economic malaise, social tensions and – above all – a political fight between mostly Indigenous pro-independence activists and Paris authorities.
Unrest broke out on Monday, sparked by plans in Paris to impose new voting rules that could give tens of thousands of non-Indigenous residents voting rights. Pro-independence groups say that would dilute the vote of Indigenous Kanaks, who make up about 40% of the population.
Despite the state of emergency imposed on the territory by the government in Paris – as well as hundreds of reinforcements for security services – residents say violence continues to make venturing out dangerous.
AFP reporters in the city’s Magenta district saw vehicles and buildings torched, with riot police on the scene trying to reassert control. Overnight on Friday, residents reported hearing gunfire, helicopters and “massive explosions” – which were reportedly caused by gas canisters blowing up inside a burning building.
Hundreds of heavily armed French soldiers and police patrolled the debris-filled streets of Noumea on Saturday.
The violence has prompted French prime minister Gabriel Attal to take New Caledonia off the globe-trotting itinerary of the Olympic torch slowly making its way to Paris for the 26 July opening ceremony of the Paris Games.
A local business group estimated the damage from the unrest, concentrated around Noumea, at 200m euros, but the damage to the islands’ reputation may cost even more.
Tourism is one of New Caledonia most profitable sectors, but an estimated 3,200 tourists and other travellers have been stranded inside or outside the archipelago by the closure of Noumea’s international airport.
One Australian family stranded in the capital told the Reuters news agency that they were rationing food as they waited for a way out of the Pacific island territory.
“The kids are definitely hungry because we don’t really have much option of what we can feed them,” Joanne Elias told Reuters by phone.
Elias, who has been in the territory since 10 May with her husband and four children, said she had been told to fill a bathtub in case water ran out, as food stocks dwindled.
“We don’t know how long we’re going to be here for,” she said, adding that her family was among about 30 Australians stuck at a local resort.
Australian foreign minister Penny Wong said Canberra was “working with authorities in France and New Caledonia, and like-minded partners including New Zealand, to assess options for Australians to safely depart”.
Aircalin plans to resume flights on Tuesday when Tontouta airport is expected to reopen, while Air Caledonie has no flights planned for the time being, the airlines said.
The New Caledonia government said on Friday the island had stocks of food for two months, but the problem was distribution.
Operations to supply food and medicine to the public will begin with teams including specialists in mine-clearing removing road barricades booby-trapped by activists, French officials have said.”
The people of Kanaky will not sell their liberty for your glass beads, Macron, nor do I believe the people of France will allow their government to do so, nor to dispatch armies to steal the hope of liberty from others. There are reasons why, when asked to identify my political ideology, I claim to be a Jacobin.
When I describe and think of myself as a Jacobin in terms of political identity, I am thinking of the relationship between Robespierre and de Sade as negative spaces of each other as dramatized in the great play Marat/Sade, and of systemic unequal power as the origin of evil and the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force which subverts revolutionary seizures of power as tyranny.
How if the soldiers sent to repress dissent and terrorize free people into submission to a fallen colonial empire which the hegemonic elites of France would very much like to refound instead join with them in solidarity? How if the citizens of France call a General Strike and seize the streets of Paris until the sovereignty and independence of the Kanak people are recognized?
Here in Kanaky, where the echoes and reflections of Algeria and Vietnam find new and terrible forms, we will see if France still remains the land of Liberté, égalité, and fraternité.
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité, ou la Mort!
Les Misérables – Do You Hear The People Sing?
Salute of the Revolution
Marat/Sade film
Independence Leaders of the Melanesians in New Caledonia | SLICE | FULL DOCUMENTARY
22 mai 2024 La révolution arrive à Kanaky, appelée Nouvelle-Calédonie par les colonialistes français
La Révolution arrive en Kanacky, alors que la France s’apprête à reconquérir son ancienne colonie en accordant le droit de vote à ses propres citoyens au détriment de l’autonomie du peuple autochtone Kanak, qui résiste d’abord par la protestation, et maintenant par le feu et la fureur. action directe et lutte anticoloniale.
Le feu prend.
En Kanaky, Haïti, Papouasie occidentale, Timor oriental, Palestine et Israël, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Chine, Thaïlande, Birmanie, Sri Lanka, îles Philippines, Brunei, Malaisie, Singapour et Indonésie, Cambodge, Laos, Vietnam, Cachemire et l’Inde, ainsi que les mouvements alliés en Russie et sur les nombreux théâtres de sa conquête impériale et de sa domination pendant la Troisième Guerre mondiale, notamment l’Ukraine et l’Europe de l’Est, le Moyen-Orient, la Méditerranée et l’Afrique, ainsi que le Dominion de l’Iran qui comprend l’Irak, la Syrie et le Liban. , et au Yémen, les feux de la lutte de libération font rage et consument l’héritage de notre histoire dans un pouvoir inégal et des systèmes d’oppression. Et la Révolution n’est pas seulement en cours dans toutes ces nations, mais aussi parmi elles, car toutes sont membres de réseaux d’alliances qui transformeront un jour notre monde en une humanité unie.
Guillermo del Toro, dans sa magnifique épopée sur la migration et l’égalité raciale Carnival Row, présente une scène dans laquelle deux jeunes successeurs à la direction de factions traditionnellement rivales se retrouvent amoureux et ont besoin d’alliés dans une intrigue secondaire qui réimagine Roméo et Juliette ; le diable rebelle Jonah Breakspear demande à son amante machiavélique Sophie Longerbane : « À qui le chaos est-il bon ? Ce à quoi elle répond : « Le chaos est bon pour nous. Le chaos est le grand espoir des impuissants.
Apportons le Chaos.
Dans la glorieuse lutte pour la libération, il faut commencer par amener le chaos et devenir ingouvernable pour créer les conditions du changement. Et comme je l’ai souvent écrit, toute Résistance est une guerre au couteau, car ceux qui veulent nous asservir et qui ne respectent aucune loi ni aucune limite ne peuvent se cacher derrière aucune.
Le peuple de Nouvelle-Calédonie ne vendra pas sa liberté pour vos perles de verre, Macron, et je ne crois pas non plus que le peuple français permettra à son gouvernement de le faire, ni d’envoyer des armées pour voler l’espoir de liberté aux autres. Il y a des raisons pour lesquelles, lorsqu’on me demande d’identifier mon idéologie politique, je me déclare jacobin.
Lorsque je me décris et me considère comme jacobin en termes d’identité politique, je pense à la relation entre Robespierre et de Sade comme des espaces négatifs l’un de l’autre, comme le montre la grande pièce Marat/Sade, et au pouvoir inégal systémique comme le l’origine du mal et l’anneau wagnérien de peur, de pouvoir et de force qui subvertit les prises de pouvoir révolutionnaires en les transformant en tyrannie.
Et si les soldats envoyés pour réprimer la dissidence et terroriser les peuples libres pour les soumettre à un empire colonial déchu que les élites hégémoniques de France aimeraient beaucoup refonder se joignaient plutôt à eux en solidarité ? Et si les citoyens français appelaient à la grève générale et s’emparaient des rues de Paris jusqu’à ce que la souveraineté et l’indépendance du peuple kanak soient reconnues ?
Ici en Kanaky, où les échos et les réflexions de l’Algérie et du Vietnam trouvent des formes nouvelles et terribles, nous verrons si la France reste encore la terre de la Liberté, de l’égalité et de la fraternité.
In the mirror of Gaza the Abyss looks back at us, and we are captives of the distorted funhouse images of Israel and America, vestiges of dreams as refuge of the outcasts and guarantor of our universal human rights, and the monsters we have now become.
I can recognize nothing in the figures which confront us, and though I hurl defiance at the endless chasms of darkness my words find no limit and return no echoes, as if devoured by the Nothing.
Yet I am neither defeated by the overwhelming force and terror of Authority nor subjugated by despair and learned helplessness, for this is the space where I live, this horror, this joy, this freedom.
As Jean Genet said to me in 1982 during the Siege of Beirut, in a lost cause, in a burning house, in a time of great darkness; “When there is no hope, we are free to do impossible things, glorious things.”
I hope that this remains true, for all of us as we struggle to emerge from the legacies of our history and seize our power from systems of oppression, for this is the great task of becoming human, in general and in this Rashomon Gate Event now unfolding in Rafah and elsewhere; to dream impossible things and make them real.
There are some things which should be true even if they never were, even if Keats was wrong and finding a thing beautiful does not make it so, even if Thomas Mann was right and love cannot redeem anything, even if as Tolkien feared we have arrived at the Black Gate with no bonds of brotherhood to unify us, even if as did Camus we must claw our way out of the ruins to make yet another Last Stand, beyond hope of victory or even survival.
There are no Israelis, no Palestinians; only people like ourselves, and the choices they make about how to be human together.
What are we worth, if we permit ruthless bandit kings to commit atrocities, plunder, and enslave others?
What is western civilization worth, if we will not live up to our fine words? And fine words they remain, such as these written by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence in 1776, a synthesis and revisioning of ideas from Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Rousseau; “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”
What is America, if not a guarantor of democracy and our universal human rights, and a beacon of hope to the world?
What is Israel, if not a refuge for the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, all those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth, among them the most demonized and persecuted people of human history, the Jews?
Let us reply with the words written by J.R.R. Tolkien between 1937 and 1955 in his luminous reimagination of the Second World War in the iconic speech of Aragorn at the Black Gate in The Return of the King which unites ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos; “A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day. An hour of wolves and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down, but it is not this day. This day we fight.”
Join us.
As I wrote in my post of March 20 2020, Fear and Despair: How Dancing With Our Darkness May Help Us to Learn, Grow, and Transform Ourselves and Our World; In this time of suffering and of fear and despair, of injustice and loss, violence and greed, isolation and loneliness, life disruptive events and cataclysms, of vast power asymmetries of patriarchy and plutocracy, and of the atavistic barbarisms of fascist tyrannies of blood, faith, and soil, we are confronted with the truth of the human condition in the darkness of its most negative aspects, but also liberated by these same empty spaces.
When illusion is robbed of its power over us, and the echo chamber of lies is revealed for the hollow misdirection of rapacious predators that it is, a space of freedom opens into which we may grow beyond our limits.
We are now all Edvard Munch’s figure in The Scream, overwhelmed with the horror of a world gone mad, our fear and despair made manifest in our cry for humanity and our lament for the brokenness of the world.
And in this moment of Awakening we seize our power and reclaim ourselves, for the realization of our flawed nature and the wounds of our humanity opens us to the pain of others, confers transformative power and heralds the redemption of the world. Humans are beautiful not in spite of our flaws, but because of them.
When all the evils have escaped the Pandora’s Box of authoritarian force and control, hope remains; for when all our gods and masters have been revealed as humbugs like Oz behind the curtain of their smoke and bluster, the realization that no one has any hold over us is swiftly followed by the terrible and wonderful awareness of our total freedom.
We are the negative spaces of our fears and other demons, figures cast like shadow puppets by the darkness which defines our limits and which we are able to embrace.
Cherish your darkness, for the darkness will set you free.
As I wrote in my post of July 22 2022, Now Is the Time of Monsters; Hope and Despair On the Cusp of Change; The government of Italy has collapsed, an act of sabotage by fascist revivalists who have abandoned the political coalition which has thus far prevented it from tumbling off the edge of a precipice into the abyss, an existential threat to the survival of her peoples and the basic services of any state which include healthcare.
But if the abyss holds terrors of a precariat held hostage by death and the material needs of survival, the abyss is also where hope lies, for here the balance of power may be changed in revolutionary struggle.
In this liminal time of the reimagination and transformation of our possibilities of becoming human, of seizures of power and the performance of the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen, Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority, let us look to our glorious past in the Resistance which was victorious in the Liberation of Italy on April 25 and the hanging of Mussolini on April 28 1945.
As Slavoj Zizek’s favorite saying goes, a French mistranslation or paraphrase of Antonio Gramsci’s line in his Prison Notebooks “La crisi consiste appunto nel fatto che il vecchio muore e il nuovo non può nascere: in questo interregno si verificano i fenomeni morbosi piú svariati”, literally “The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born, in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear”, as “Le vieux monde se meurt, le nouveau monde tarde à apparaître et dans ce clair-obscur surgissent les monstres”, which introduces the idea of monstrosity, referential to the historical development of the idea in Michel de Montaigne, Michel Foucault, and Georges Canguilhem’s work The Normal and the Pathological, a dialectical process of mimesis which results in the form of the principle as; “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.”
Meanings shift, adapt, and change as they transgress boundaries, inhabit public and private spaces, and unfold over vast gulfs of time, and so must we.
As I wrote in my post of December 20 2022, This Christmas, Confront the Meaninglessness of Life Not With Abjection, Despair, and Helplessness But With the Joy of Total Freedom; As we enter the Christmas season, a time much of America will be consumed by orgiastic buying as displays of elite class membership and obligatory feasts often with people we don’t actually like or deeply know, adrift in a universe without imposed values living lives of random chaotic episodes of being which form no grand design, ephemeral and illusory, subjected to totalizing passions and caught in vast invisible systems of falsification, commodification, and dehumanization enslaved to authority and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege like Charlie Chaplin eaten by the gears of the machine he serves in The Factory, let us confront the meaninglessness of life and the terror of our nothingness not with abjection, despair, and helplessness but with the joy of total freedom.
When there are no rules, there are no impossibilities.
Merry Christmas, and don’t forget to run amok and be ungovernable.
As written by Wendy Syfret, author of The Sunny Nihilist: : How a Meaningless Life Can Make You Truly Happy, in Aeon; “Exhausted by the modern pressure to squeeze meaning out of every moment? Here’s a radical way to reset your priorities.
In theory, the pursuit of a meaningful life is noble. Foundational concepts of community, ethics, logic, morality, consciousness and equality were born from the investigation of meaning. From Aristotle and Plato to the entire oeuvre of John Hughes, the urge to wrestle with the point of it all has inspired great works of art, literature and film. But today something’s gone awry and the pursuit of meaning inspires more angst than awe. The search has moved from a private pursuit to a marketable product.
The rise of meaningless meaning
Let me demonstrate with a game, ‘spot the meaningless meaning’. Next time you’re at the supermarket, pharmacy or really any non-enlightened space of commerce, pay attention to what the products are attempting to offer. One might expect a barrage of quality and utility assurances: ‘these chickpeas are low sodium’, ‘this facemask is non-irritating’. But, increasingly, aspirations are higher. A chocolate bar isn’t skim (skimmed) milk powder and sugar, it’s a chance to create an intergenerational family moment. A lipstick isn’t a bullet of colour to light up a drawn face, but a weapon of radical self-expression.
Rather than informing a population of philosophically fulfilled, elevated beings, the ubiquity of all this bite-sized meaning has had an adverse effect, fuelling our familiar, modern malaise of dissatisfaction, disconnection and burnout.
The fixation with making all areas of existence generically meaningful has created exhausting realities where everything suddenly really, really matters. Daily newsletters flood our inboxes, prescribing never-ending tasks and goals to meditate over and mark as complete. In the shower, we listen to podcasts about making this day count, then towel off and cram in a few minutes of mindful journalling about what we managed to meaningfully achieve the day before.
But as meaning moves from a long-term exploration to a daily metric, it’s creating new problems. When we’re not immediately able to locate meaning in our actions, jobs, relationships and consumer products, we’re left feeling like anxious, empty failures. The once-noble pursuit that built culture and helped us carve out rewarding existences becomes just another task on the endless checklist of a ‘good life’ that we’re never quite able to tick off.
Nihilism as a solution
So what’s the alternative? Is the answer to embrace a state of pointless, nihilistic chaos? Yeah, pretty much. At least that’s what’s worked for me.
For the past few years, I’ve been consumed by nihilism. Reading that, it would be fair to assume things haven’t been peachy. But my descent into the controversial philosophy hasn’t been a grim road of despair and hopelessness. Quite the opposite. It’s become one of the most illuminating and fortifying parts of my life.
Rejecting the urge to seek and denote meaning to all things has changed the way I assign value and spend time. It has challenged what I focus on and, most importantly, what I disregard. I’ve found that a kind of optimistic or ‘sunny’ nihilism highlights the delicate beauty of existence, the absurdity of life, and the exciting chaos of the everyday. But I’m getting ahead of myself. To understand the power of sunny nihilism, it’s necessary to begin with the philosophy itself.
The broadest explanation of nihilism argues that life is meaningless and the systems to which we subscribe to give us a sense of purpose – such as religion, politics, traditional family structures or even the notion of absolute truth itself – are fantastical human constructs; inventions to make the randomness of existence feel a little more orderly. Or, as nihilism’s poster boy Friedrich Nietzsche put it: ‘Every belief, every considering something true, is necessarily false because there is simply no true world.’
Breaking it down further, the American philosopher Donald Crosby divides nihilism into four main forms: moral, epistemological, cosmic and, perhaps the best-known, existential. Moral nihilism rejects fundamental ideas of right and wrong; epistemological nihilism takes issue with absolute truth; cosmic nihilism considers nature to be inherently indifferent and hostile; and finally we reach existential nihilism, in many ways the culmination of all these considerations, which probably keeps most people up at night – the basic idea being that there is no meaning to life, everything is pointless.
Reading all that, it’s fair to argue that nihilism is kind of a bummer. These ideas do pose the risk of curdling into a kind of toxic nihilism that leaves the individual feeling despondent and overwhelmed. What’s the point of doing anything if nothing matters? If there is no inherent understanding of good and bad, why try to lead a moral life? If everything is pointless, why even get out of bed?
The cleansing power of sunny nihilism
While I’ll admit that the message that nothing matters – not your job, god, universe, certainly not what type of canned goods you buy – is an overwhelming thought, it doesn’t have to be. Set against this never-ending obsession with locating (or, too often, purchasing) meaning, it can be liberating.
When I contemplate life’s pointlessness, I begin by remembering that, in the scope of all human history, I really matter very little (a rather cosmic approach). My issues and concerns are mute. My successes and failures will all be forgotten. As will the achievements and stumbles of everyone around me (existential nihilism at its finest).
While I may feel dwarfed by the scope of endless and apathetic time, the smallest elements of my life begin to expand. If nothing matters long-term, my focus shifts to this moment. I understand that the present, however mundane, is as fleeting, temporal, fragile and forgettable as the greatest events in human history.
Nihilism makes me wonder about what I do and don’t pay attention to. Is what another person thinks of me imbued with greater meaning (or meaninglessness) as compared with a brush of jasmine tumbling over a neighbour’s fence? Not really. So why am I consumed by one while ignoring the other?
By his own description, Nietzsche ‘philosophise[d] with a hammer’, breaking open large ideas and challenging his readers to see what could be reformed with the pieces. In this way nihilism, like all philosophies, is a tool to explore parts of our lives. As with any tool, it can be picked up and put down, used to create or destroy; outcomes and executions are dependent on the user’s intent. It is up to you to decide if you will fall into the destructive grooves of toxic nihilism, or opt for something a little lighter. You may not have a purpose, but you do have agency. It’s this reading of nihilism that I think about when considering a life without meaning.
But how does one go about picking up such a tool and using it in a positive way? This Guide will help you embrace sunny nihilism and avoid its toxic alternative.
Think it through
Understand the difference between passive and active forms of nihilism
The challenges posed by nihilism weren’t lost on Nietzsche, who had an elegant way of explaining how the philosophy can serve as a destructive or constructive force. According to him, passive nihilists absorb the messages of meaninglessness and are threatened. They fear the void so scramble to fill it by indulging in any offering of it. As Nolen Gertz wrote in Aeon in 2020, this form of blind self-protection is a ‘dangerous form of self-destruction’.
He added: ‘To believe just for the sake of believing in something can lead to a superficial existence, to the complacent acceptance of believing anything believed by others, because believing in something (even if it turns out to be nothing worth believing in) will be seen by the passive nihilist as preferable to taking the risk of not believing in anything …’
Which is how we end up back in the trap of meaningless meaning. Or standing in the supermarket aisle, trying to convince ourselves that a can of chickpeas really does matter.
As a more constructive alternative, Nietzsche ushered individuals to evolve into active nihilists. That is, to stare into the abyss and see the absence of meaning not as a tragedy but as an opportunity. To consider it a space to fill with your own values, to define how you want to be in the world and what you believe to be true. An active nihilist isn’t intimidated by chaos, they recognise it as a chance to create something new and better.
In my own journey toward sunny nihilism, I landed somewhere in the middle. I wasn’t horrified by a lack of absolute truth, but I also didn’t rush to write my own. Rather, I chose to pause, stare into the void, and consider the freedom of nothingness.
Stay alert to meaningless meaning
Whereas nihilism can prompt reflection and widen your view on existence, the commercial hijacking of meaning plays into the vulnerabilities of the passive nihilist, contributing to our era’s epidemic of self-obsessed selfishness. It not only encourages you to centre every action around yourself, but it deceptively presents this as a noble act. When you embrace this kind of personal mythmaking, you give yourself permission to spend a lot of time thinking about your own life, actions and experiences.
Speaking to Politico magazine in 2020, Virginia Heffernan, the author of Magic and Loss: The Internet as Art (2016), said: ‘the recent fantasy of “optimising” a life – for peak performance, productivity, efficiency – has created a cottage industry that tries to make the dreariest possible lives sound heroic.’
To help you avoid this decadent trap, it is worth being vigilant of, and guarding against, the ways the world is trying to convince you that you’re partaking in a sacred act – by positioning every brand, product or service as somehow meaningful.
Are those period undies really a symbol of rebellion, or just a convenient sanitary product? Does the bottle of hot sauce in my fridge truly mark me as an iconoclastic thrill-seeker, or just indicate a robust gut flora? Is my bank really helping me invest in family ? While writing this article, I was conveniently served an advert for ‘Florence by Mills’, the new teen skincare range from the actress Millie Bobby Brown (I appreciate the algorithm recognising my youthful spirit). The entire range is clad in the familiar pastel colours and toothless message of ‘empowering young people through something something’ of so many personal care products. But the ‘Feed Your Soul Love U a Latte’ mask stood out in particular. Turns out it’s never too young to preach that enlightenment can be achieved in a 15-minute topical treatment.
I hope that the young people browsing these products are resilient enough to not fall into such narratives; that they’re able to pause to ask what these cheap exchanges are calling on them to invest emotionally or financially. Will this purchase make them happy, or is it an example of what Heffernan cautioned against when she said we were out to make ‘the dreariest possible lives sound heroic’?
Recognise the happy side of nihilism
When promoting nihilism as the antidote to the commercialisation of meaning, I tend to meet the same repeated questions: if there’s no point, then why do anything? Why get out of bed? Wash your hair? Treat another person with kindness? Not fall into a quivering heap?
I’m reminded of an episode of the Netflix sitcom The Good Place (2016-20). Chidi – a character who happens to be a moral philosopher – has the kind of existential crisis that inspires these queries. During his breakdown, he walks a classroom of philosophy students down the major paths where humanity has attempted to locate meaning and understand how to live an ‘ethical life’. After cycling through the arguments of virtue ethics, consequentialism and deontology, he finally declares that all these pathways to meaning lead nowhere (it’s worth watching the show to hear Chidi explain why) before concluding that nihilism is the only logical philosophical view – at which point he has a full meltdown.
While I love Chidi, I find the scene frustrating for how narrowly it presents this cause and effect. Such a response has always puzzled me. After all, did you get out of bed this morning to search for the meaning of life or for a cup of coffee? Again, are such grand questions really bringing such grand comforts?
In contrast to Chidi, another pop-culture figure shows how nihilism can inspire greater happiness. In the film The Beach Bum (2019), Matthew McConaughey plays Moondog, an epicurean, once-iconic, Florida-based writer. His is a woozy and colourful tale of excess and hedonism that involves a lot of drinking, drugs, avoided responsibility, and sex. All of which are indulged in with few consequences.
Watching The Beach Bum, you feel you’ve seen this movie before, you know to wait for the fall, when Moondog will collapse under the weight of his shirked responsibilities and the system will catch up to him. Except the fall never comes. After seeing it at South by Southwest film festival, the critic Hazem Fahmy wrote: ‘Rather than simply not address these issues, the film goes out of its way to remind us that nothing in this strange dimension truly matters.’
Moondog doesn’t care about anything, he lives for pleasure. Towards the end of the film, he outlines his life’s mantra to a reporter: ‘We’re here to have a good time.’ For all this destruction, and clear disregard for rules, values and consequences, Moondog isn’t punished. By the end of the film, he has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize and several million dollars. Although, true to form, he shows they’re meaningless too (I won’t spoil the finale).
Moondog’s embrace of nihilism demonstrates that, when you stop focusing on a greater point, you’re able to ask simpler but more rewarding questions: what does happiness look like right now? What would give me pleasure today? How can I achieve a sense of satisfaction in this moment? Most of the time, the answers aren’t complex. They’re small delights already at hand – time spent with loved ones, a delicious meal, a walk in nature, a cup of coffee. Or, in Moondog’s case, a lot of booze and parties.
Nihilism doesn’t have to spiral into selfishness
Moondog’s experience sounds great to me, but it leads to a second concern surrounding nihilism. It might not make you miserable, but what about everyone who has to hang out with you? If nothing matters, you’re not part of some larger plan and you’re not held accountable by any rulebook. Motivated only by what feels good in the moment, what’s stopping you acting only for your own interests?
Nietzsche was mindful of these pain points, writing in Beyond Good and Evil (1886): ‘He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.’
Nihilism asks us to toss out meaning and gaze into the void that’s left in its place. But rather than being a simple, terrifying black hole, a void can prompt reflection. It’s a space to be filled with whatever you want. In that way, nihilism can serve as a funhouse mirror, reflecting and distorting your own beliefs. Approach it with pain and fear, and those feelings will be magnified. Go to it looking for a way to excuse gross behaviour, and you’ll find it.
Stare into the abyss
Give it a go yourself. Take a moment to truly submit to your own smallness in the Universe. To admit you are meaningless. That you don’t matter. That your name, ego, reputation, family, friends and loves will soon be gone.
This needn’t be a destructive experience. Once the discomfort passes, and your ego abates, stop to consider – how has your understanding of your own time and energy changed? Is your job really so important when coupled with the knowledge that even the greatest achievements in human history will eventually be lost to time? Are the issues, people or situations that cause you stress or pain actually worth the worry when you remember that no one will ever remember or really be impacted by them?
The only real impact these earthly concerns have is on what they take you away from: things that may not ‘matter’, but at least bring you joy.
Focusing on the scale of your own life, and how insignificant it is, also allows you to ask: OK, if I don’t matter, and neither do the issues that take up so much of my time, how does the world show itself differently? If I’m no longer the centre of my own universe, what takes that space?
You might start wondering what you want to last after you’ve gone, and what needs to be protected and treasured.
I considered these points recently while witnessing a widely affecting mass collision with nihilism – the delivery of the first images from the James Webb Space Telescope. The shots showed an inconceivable array of distant galaxies that existed billions of years in the past. It was an overwhelming view that crashed into any understanding we have of time, scale and distance – not to mention the potential for life and realities beyond our own. Responding to it, it felt like the whole world had a mass awakening to individual inconsequentialism.
But the reaction wasn’t mass depression or hopelessness. It was awe. People wondered over the beauty and scale of worlds they could never truly comprehend. They saw how their own lives barely register on a cosmic level, that our own galaxy wasn’t even a blip. This sense of our own meaninglessness was humbling. It didn’t break people’s hearts but excited them, reminded them of the inconceivable beauty and majesty of existence. People felt thankful for being a dot in an endless sky, to be part of this cosmic tapestry, even if just for a meaningless moment.
It takes guts, but you too might find that the abyss reframes your attention to things you hope will last for a little longer than yourself. Art, community, the people you love, their right to feel safe, respected and well. If you’re looking for somewhere to redirect all this formerly self-involved energy, start there. In place of existential angst, psychological annihilation or selfish abandon, you can find relief in larger causes.
Try a light meditation on death
When I’m overwhelmed, remembering that one day I won’t exist makes whatever’s stressing me appear small. Accepting this finality transforms the bland environs I’m ignoring into an overwhelming buffet of smells, sights and experiences that suddenly feel impossibly rare.
This ‘mindfulness of death’ is central to the work of the artificial intelligence scientist and Buddhist teacher Nikki Mirghafori. To access this feeling, she counsels trying a form of ‘death meditation’ to help confront your fear of death, and experience the strange wonder that can come from that.
To try it, she instructs meditating with the mantra ‘this could be my last breath’. The theory is that by doing so, you work through the terror a little at a time, observing what comes to the surface during the practice and confronting each fear until you eventually reach a place of peace.
Mirghafori posits that, by accepting your own mortality and facing life’s impermanence, you can align the way you live with your truest values. It’s many people’s lack of interest in contemplating death – and as such, how precious and fleeting our lives are – that allows so many to waste their time.
I can report that this is a terrifying exercise. It’s like rehearsing your final moments, inviting your mind to flood with fear, regret, longing, loss, love and gratitude. When you imagine each breath to be your last, each breath becomes a gift on arrival. Even after you’re done, it’s impossible to not enter the rest of your day with a degree of elation at being alive.
Doing it, I’m reminded of what Epicurus once said: ‘Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist.’ Epicurus didn’t believe in life after death, as either a punishment or a reward. He taught that life and all it could offer was happening to us right now.
Just as nihilism has become associated with narrow-minded destruction, Epicurus is often synonymous with hedonism and a ceaseless pursuit of selfish pleasures. But in reality, he was certain this kind of living would usher people away from materialism and greed. His ‘pleasure principle’ championed being and doing good, arguing that, with one precious life to enjoy, not a moment should be wasted in guilt or anxiety over pain caused to others. The only way to feel truly good was to treat people well.
Remember pointless pleasures
I’d like to end by lightening things up a little. One way to refocus on the pointless pleasure that actually forms the bedrock of our lives is to start a ‘nice things’ list. Across the day, make an effort to jot down moments, people and events that make you happy.
I’ve been doing this for years. Reviewing my own rambling lists, I’m always surprised by the simplicity of the entries: the smell of fresh basil, an excellent joke, two dogs meeting in the street. Alone they are innocuous (and usually overlooked), but together they flavour my days with endless sweetness. Learning to pay attention to them returns me to what actually provides solace in my day, training me to not overlook the now for the promise of the one day.
So often in the pursuit of greater meaning we erase not only the joy of these forgotten delights, but also their collective power. Yes, a flock of galahs on my nature strip, or crying to a Paul Kelly song, or the spasmodic energy of Junior Bake Off (my most recent entries) are not life-altering – but, taking time to notice and appreciate them, they form the sum of their parts. A handful of treasured beats becomes a good day, a good week, a good year, a good life. Meaningless, sure. Precious, absolutely.
Key points – How to be a happy nihilist
The rise of meaningless meaning. The search for meaning used to be a noble pursuit, but it’s become commercialised and now inspires more angst than awe.
Nihilism as a solution. This is the philosophy that says life is meaningless. Handled with care, it can be liberating.
The cleansing power of sunny nihilism. This is a kind of optimistic nihilism that highlights the delicate beauty of existence, the absurdity of life, and the exciting chaos of the everyday.
Understand the difference between passive and active forms of nihilism.
Passive nihilists scramble to fill the void with anything to hand; active nihilists are undaunted, and fill the space with their own values.
Stay alert to meaningless meaning. To avoid passive or toxic nihilism, it pays to be vigilant of, and guard against, the ways the world is trying to convince you that you’re partaking in a sacred act.
Recognise the happy side of nihilism. When you stop focusing on a greater point, you’ll find you can ask simpler but more rewarding questions, such as: what does happiness look like right now?
Nihilism doesn’t have to spiral into selfishness. When you stare into the abyss, it reframes your attention to things you hope will last for a little longer than yourself.
Try a light meditation on death. I can report that this is a terrifying exercise. But when you imagine each breath to be your last, each breath becomes a gift on arrival.
Remember pointless pleasures. From the smell of fresh basil to an excellent joke, start a ‘nice things’ list. Meaningless, sure. Precious, absolutely.
Why it matters
The young philosophers embracing nihilism
For uplifting and earnest examples of nihilism’s application, check out the way younger philosophers are exploring it. Two TEDx talks by teenagers stand out in particular. In 2018, Elias Skjoldborg, a student at Harwood Union High School in Vermont, used the platform to introduce his take on ‘optimistic nihilism’. In short, he argues that if life is meaningless – and we are not pinned to some greater existential task or goal – then we may as well focus on finding happiness during this brief, meaningless flash of consciousness we call existence.
When he says ‘if you died right now, it wouldn’t really make a difference in the big picture. Had you never been born, nobody would really care,’ he presents it as good news. He adds: ‘That life has no meaning is not a reason … to be sad.’ Rather, he explains, if our lives are needless, then the only directive we have is to figure out how to find happiness in our momentary blip of consciousness. Skjoldborg suggested that his audience get hobbies, help others, solve problems rather than creating them, and just try their best.
Skjoldborg is not alone in his observations. In his talk a year earlier, Siddharth Gupta, a student at Kodaikanal International School in India, also opened up about how nihilism has helped him. Giving his talk the title ‘Confessions of an Existential Nihilist’, he explained how his belief that life was worthless had given him the ‘opportunity to find meaning in all that I do’.
Meanwhile, over on YouTube, Khadija Mbowe, a Gambian Canadian vlogger on sociology and media, recently looked at nihilism and absurdism in a video asking if life still had value if it was a meaningless random occurrence within an uncaring universe. Clad in a bright orange graphic T-shirt with matching statement makeup, Mbowe looked like any other luminous member of Gen Z, asking: ‘What does our life, our existence, mean when we don’t believe we’re put here for a reason?’ as easily as if they were reacting to a viral mukbang video. Drawing on references from as broad a field as James Baldwin and RuPaul’s Drag Race, Mbowe asks big questions that don’t lead to dense, depressing answers. Instead, this vlogger’s takes are thoughtful, exploratory and ultimately hopeful.
Each generation has a tendency to make the case for why their set of circumstances is especially dire. But for young people coming of age during rolling crises of pandemics, climate catastrophes and quaking world economies, they might have a strong case for being particularly hard done by. Yet basking in the aforementioned reflections of these fresh-faced philosophers, one feels a little lightened, not only by their constructive interpretation of nihilism, but also by the resilience it appears to offer them.
Links & books
In my book The Sunny Nihilist: How a Meaningless Life Can Make You Truly Happy (2021), I explore not only the modern tendency to overinvest in meaning, but also the darker consequences of such a relationship. In particular, how it intersects with our notions of work, love, family, capitalism and politics. I also explore how people can detangle themselves, and how gratifying it is to do so.
The literary darlings Ottessa Moshfegh, Melissa Broder and Lisa Taddeo all frequently return to themes of millennial nihilism in their work. Meanwhile, the writers Jia Tolentino, Susan Sontag and Jenny Odell are looking more broadly at our interest in meaning, worth and community in a way that intersects with these ideas. Their deep folios of writing are edifying reading – I suggest starting with Tolentino’s Trick Mirror (2019) and Odell’s How to Do Nothing (2019), both books are as digestible as they are illuminating (and have personally been reliable elevated small-talk fodder for the past few years).
I already mentioned the TV show The Good Place (do check it out if you haven’t already), but nihilism is present in many of our other favourite entertainment offerings, such as BoJack Horseman (2014-20), a cartoon that follows a clutch of humans and anthropomorphic animals as they navigate Hollywood, fame, and their own cycles of ambition and destruction. One nihilistic moment involved Mr Peanutbutter, a lovable and dim-witted Labrador who is a successful TV actor, consoling his then-wife by tenderly reminding her: ‘The Universe is a cruel, uncaring void. The key to being happy isn’t the search for meaning. It’s to just keep yourself busy with unimportant nonsense and, eventually, you’ll be dead.’ I promise it’s funnier than it sounds.
Nihilism has found its way to other screens too. The films Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) and Palm Springs (2020) both show how fun and bombastic these ideas can be. Although my personal favourite surprise nihilistic resource might just be SpongeBob SquarePants (1999-). If a chatty sponge can’t convince you of the chaotic charm of existence, I’m not sure what can.”
As I wrote in my post of October 13 2023, Our World Is Destroyed and Recreated in This Ritual of the Black Sun Wherein Our Humanity Is Eclipsed By the Legacies of Our History; As the season of Halloween is signaled tomorrow by the new moon, it opens with a solar eclipse and the Ritual of the Black Sun as symbolized despair, abjection, grief, and fear, illuminated with great beauty and horror in Stanton Marlin’s study of the alchemical works of Jung in The Black Sun: the alchemy and art of darkness, William Blake’s Book of Urizen, and Julia Kristeva’s Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia, my three primary references on this subject.
And this ritual of transformative rebirth occurs in the wake of the war crimes and atrocities of the Hamas terror attack on Israel, which now conclusively from plans and orders found on its slain perpetrators includes the planned mass murders and abduction of school children.
There are two possible replies to an event of this kind, which disrupts and fractures systems of order on the positive side and violates our humanity as degradation and dehumanization on the negative like a Janus coin of mirror reversals; with fear and its mad children rage and violence, or with love and its praxis as compassion and mercy.
To bring harm or healing, enforcement of virtue and the tyranny and terror of wars of imperial dominion and conquest and the centralization of power to authority and carceral states of force and control, or solidarity as guarantors of each others universal human rights and democracy as co owners of the state in a free society of equals.
If we choose war in this moment, and America sends military aid to Israel as a sponsor and collaborator in the genocide of the Palestinians in retribution for this vast war crime and atrocity perpetrated by Hamas to fasten their political control of the people of Gaza, the Age of Tyrants has begun.
If we choose peace and send humanitarian aid both to the people of Israel and of Gaza in the war of annihilation which is coming as Netanyahu gathers his forces to invade, we may yet have a chance for a future democracy to emerge in the region and globally as a United Humankind.
Our best chance to heal the legacies of our history and reunite the peoples of Israel and Palestine is if they turn their backs on those who claim to act in their name, both Netanyahu’s regime and that of Hamas, and refuse to kill each other in service to the power of those who would enslave us.
Let us send no armies to enforce virtue, and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.
As written by Sahar Vardi in The Times of Israel, in an article entitled Dual loyalty: It’s so hard to have humanity here. It’s exhausting, and it feels like time after time the world is just asking you to let go; “We on the left are often accused of dual loyalty. And on days like this, I really feel it. Even if loyal isn’t exactly the right word here, as I’ll explain, the sentiment is right.
In Jerusalem’s Mahane Yehuda market this morning, a street musician sang “Am Yisrael Chai” in a mournful register. The market itself was nearly empty and a woman was talking to her friend about her regular vegetable seller who was not allowed to come and open shop today. All stalls owned by Arabs are closed.
On a street in the Rehavia neighborhood, families get out of two cars. Most of them were already crying, the rest with an indescribable sadness in their eyes, as they knock softly on the door of one of the houses. Family of someone who died? Of someone kidnapped?
You open a video of a sanitation worker who was beaten in the city center because he is Arab and try not to avert your gaze.
“Dual loyalty” is seeing both this and that with tears in your eyes.
It’s that moment when you talk to a friend who doesn’t know whether their relatives are dead or kidnapped and what they should even hope for, and to see the helplessness, the fear, the deep pain. And a moment later, it’s talking to a friend from Gaza who can only say that every night is now the scariest night of his life; that he calculates his chances, and those of his daughters, of waking up alive the next morning.
“Dual loyalty” is feeling the heartbreak of this and also of that.
It is to hold this moment between the heartbreak and pain and shock over the total destruction of Nir Oz and to think about all the people there, and at the same time, to feel the horror over the impending total destruction of Shuja’iyya and to think about all the people there.
It’s feeling the urge to donate blood and organize food packages for the south, and also to be in the West Bank village of Susia when settlers shoot any shepherd who dares to leave the village.
Loyalty may not be the right word. It’s dual pain, dual heartbreak, care, love. It is to hold everyone’s humanity. And it’s hard. It’s so hard to have humanity here. It’s exhausting, and it feels like time after time the world is just asking you to let go. It’s so much easier to “choose a side” – it almost doesn’t matter which side, just choose, and stick to it, and at least reduce the amount of pain you hold. At least feel part of a group and less alone in all this.
As if that’s really an option. As if we don’t understand that our pains are intertwined. That there is no solution only for the pain of Ofakim without a solution for the pain of Khan Yunis. And we know it and recite it, and feel the pain of it all over and over again.”
As written by Mordecai Martin in Anti Racism Daily, in an article entitled How do I both condemn Hamas and support Israeli and Palestinian people?; “I started paying attention in earnest to Israel/Palestine politics when I went to study Hebrew on an Israeli kibbutz in 2005 before conducting religious study in Jerusalem for two years. I know deeply that Israel and Palestine are real places with real people, not a religious fantasy, political football, or exotic destination. I am sharing this response to hopefully get us closer to a world without violence in the Holy Land, where my fellow Jews are safely and happily living wherever they like, including in Palestine, and where the Palestinian people are doing likewise. It is an ambitious goal. I don’t really know if I believe my writing will have that outcome.
But I will not begin with certain common cliches.
I do not think it is necessary (or true) to say that I believe that the state of Israel, a state consisting primarily of Jews organized under the principles of Zionism, has any right to exist in the Holy Land. I don’t think that’s necessary to say because the Zionist state of Israel EXISTS regardless of my beliefs.
I do not have to assert Jews’ right to self-determination. That right was exercised with the creation of the state of Israel. As an anti-Zionist Jew, I believe that the creation of a Zionist state that legally dispossesses Palestinian people was disastrous morally, culturally, and religiously. I spend my time in the Jewish community urging divestment from such a state.
I do not think I have to condemn the murder of civilians by Hamas militants before considering condemnation of the murder of civilians by the colonial Israeli army. The universal condemnation of civilian deaths, regardless of the victims’ nationality, should be a given for us all, as it is for international law. International law is also clear that decolonization, including by armed struggle, is legitimate and that apartheid systems are not.
There are also things I find necessary to say very clearly.
We must take away the ability to kill civilians from any and all military actors, including Hamas and the Israeli army.
I believe in the safety and well-being of all Jews, even those I disagree with. Because of my political beliefs, I am often accused in bad faith of not desiring safety for Jews.
It’s necessary to say, “Free Palestine.” Palestinians, the people who have lived on the Holy Land from time immemorial, were forcibly removed from their homes for Jewish settlement. Palestinians are not free. They can not move about their country thanks to restrictions enforced by the Israeli army. They are dying the shocking deaths of those who live under apartheid. I demand their freedom and sovereignty in their land. Who do I demand it from? The only entity that currently claims political power, claims to represent my Jewishness, and receives the carte-blanche support of the United States government: the Israeli state.
Many, many people hold space for both the victims of attacks by Hamas militants and the suffering civilians of Gaza. No one worth listening to says the human heart can only mourn for some but not others, that it’s only sad when Jews die, or only sad when Palestinians die. What we are really having a conversation about is the future of the Holy Land, whether it will grant democratic rights to all its residents, and what to do about the ongoing violence between the various parties that hope to benefit financially, politically, ideologically, from their “side” coming out on top.”
Yet hope remains for transformative change, the fall of theocratic regimes and the emergence of secular democracy free from the legacies of our history, a history which in the bifurcated and fragmented states and national identities of the region divides one people into Israelis and Palestinians through fascisms of blood, faith, and soil in service to the power of tyrants and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, systems of oppression which are our true enemies.
A massive people’s protest movement has erupted both locally and globally, and this gives me hope that we may yet escape the Age of Tyrants, which I predict will unfold as six to eight centuries of totalitarian empires and wars of dominion ending with the extinction of humankind; with 92 to 98 percent probability.
But the chance to salvage something of our humanity and our civilization of democracy and universal human rights does exist, however fragile and unlikely, if we can unite and act in solidarity as each other’s liberators and guarantors of a free society of equals.
As written by Alex Lantier in the World Socialist Web Site of the Fourth International, in an article entitled Mass protests erupt internationally against Israeli war on Gaza; “A week after Palestinians initiated an armed uprising against Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip, protests are erupting internationally against Israel’s war on Gaza.
The fascistic regime of Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered 1.1 million Palestinians to flee Gaza City and go south, along roads bombed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Israel—which has now cut off Gaza’s water, fuel and electricity, and whose leaders call the Palestinians “human animals”—is targeting the Palestinians for genocide.
As the scale of the crimes committed by the Israeli regime and its NATO allies has become clear, protests have erupted around the world in bold disobedience of media denunciations of Palestinians, police intimidation and protest bans.
The most significant demonstration Friday took place in New York City, where thousands rallied to oppose the onslaught against Palestine, in open defiance of the unrelenting pro-Israel propaganda of the entire American political establishment and corporate media. In the center of world imperialism, home to the largest Jewish population of any American city, masses of people—including over 1,000 Jews—expressed their revulsion with the unfolding crimes in Gaza.
Other protests on Friday involving hundreds of people were held in Pittsburgh, Portland and Washington D.C., with larger demonstrations planned across the US this weekend. Despite the efforts of the media and politicians to demonize all protests against Israel’s policies as “antisemitic” and to isolate those feeling sympathy for the Palestinians, opposition is building among workers and youth of all backgrounds. A 2021 poll found that one-quarter of American Jews consider Israel to be an “apartheid state” hostile to the Palestinians, a figure that will only continue to grow.
Thousands also took to the streets in London once again on Friday, defying similar propaganda and threats from the British media and political establishment.
A series of larger demonstrations also swept across the Middle East, involving hundreds of thousands of people. In Jordan, mass protests in Amman demanded the opening of Jordan’s border with the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Protesting crowds marched on the border with Israel, only to be turned back by Jordanian police.
Large protests took place in Sanaa and Tehran. In Cairo, tens of thousands rallied outside the Al Azhar Mosque, chanting “Free Palestine.” Thousands defied a state ban to march in support of Gaza in Tunis. In Iraq, a country that has lost over one million lives after decades of US-led sanctions, war and occupation since the 1991 Gulf War, hundreds of thousands marched in Baghdad.
Protesters in the Middle East are effectively opposing not only the Israeli regime, but also their own governments, which have betrayed the Palestinians for decades. The Arab bourgeoisie’s role is exemplified by the treachery of the Egyptian military dictatorship. Having signed a treaty with Israel in 1978, Egypt has now closed its borders to Palestinians trying to flee Gaza.
In Israel itself, despite the ultra-reactionary political atmosphere fostered by Netanyahu’s government, which has now been joined by the official opposition, there is explosive discontent. Millions joined protests earlier this year against Netanyahu’s attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary. The attack on the judiciary, as a letter titled “Elephant in the Room” from 3,000 predominantly Jewish intellectuals made clear, is intimately tied up with the conditions that led to the Hamas uprising.
The letter states:
(There is a) direct link between Israel’s recent attack on the judiciary and its illegal occupation of Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Palestinian people lack almost all basic rights, including the right to vote and protest. They face constant violence: this year alone, Israeli forces have killed over 190 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and demolished over 590 structures. Settler vigilantes burn, loot, and kill with impunity. …
There cannot be democracy for Jews in Israel as long as Palestinians live under a regime of apartheid, as Israeli legal experts have described it. Indeed, the ultimate purpose of the judicial overhaul is to tighten restrictions on Gaza, deprive Palestinians of equal rights both beyond the Green Line and within it, annex more land, and ethnically cleanse all territories under Israeli rule of their Palestinian population.
All the major imperialist powers stand exposed by their support for Netanyahu and his war on the Palestinians. On Sunday, October 8, the heads of state of France, Italy, Germany, Britain and the United States pledged “steadfast and united support to the State of Israel,” and an “unequivocal condemnation of Hamas.” At a press conference in Qatar on Friday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken doubled down in condoning Israeli crimes.
Asked by a reporter if Israel is “retaliating in a fury” and whether the US supports this, Blinken replied with total hypocrisy and double-talk: “What Israel is doing is not retaliation. What Israel is doing is defending the lives of its people. … I think any country faced with what Israel has suffered would likely do the same thing.”
What message are the NATO powers sending? They aim to create on a global scale a new era of imperialist colonial rule. They brook no resistance to the Israeli state’s illegal, 16-year blockade of Gaza, its denial of food and medicine to the impoverished enclave, and its targeted assassinations of Gaza residents. If this united front of imperialist gangsters were to sum up its policy toward the Palestinian people in one phrase, it would be: “Slaves you were, and slaves you remain.”
In a video released Friday, which has gone almost entirely unreported in the Western media, Hamas official Basim Naim summarized the background of Israeli oppression, which led to the October 7 rebellion.
He said:
We are speaking about a 75-year-old occupation that neglected and ignored all political and legal means to settle the conflict, where the Israeli enemy continued their policy of denial of the Palestinian people’s existence and their national rights. We have repeatedly warned during the past few months and years that the situation on the ground was not sustainable and that the explosion was only a matter of time.
We have warned repeatedly about the Israeli continued violations in Al-Aqsa Mosque and their attempt to change its status quo in an apparent plan to divide the holy mosque spatially and temporally. We have also warned about the state terrorism implemented by the fascist settlers across the occupied West Bank. We have warned about the forceful expulsion of our people from Jerusalem. We have also warned about the systematic crimes against our prisoners, including women and children, in Israeli jails.
And lastly, we have warned about the Israeli siege on Gaza for more than 17 years, which is a war crime that turned Gaza into the biggest open-air prison on earth, where a whole generation has lost all kind of hopes. But unfortunately, no one listened to these warnings, and the international community, especially the Western countries, continue to give Israel the cover at all levels to continue committing its crimes.
In prosecuting their war against Gaza, the Israeli government and Western imperialist powers aim to obliterate this historical background and numb the population with wall-to-wall atrocity propaganda.
While the deaths of Israeli civilians are undoubtedly tragic, the violence that took place occurred in the context of a massively oppressed people rebelling against a heavily armed oppressor. Even if one were to accept all the accounts of Palestinian violence, it only raises the question—what could lead to such violence?
History judges differently the violence of a population rising up against oppression and the calculated resort to mass murder by capitalist state machines armed with vast military and financial resources. The imperialists have always claimed that the resistance of the oppressed to colonialism justifies their savage retribution. In exacting this retribution, they have always portrayed the oppressed as savages and murderers.
In 1899, the Boxers revolted against the division of China into imperialist spheres of influence. Citing the Boxers’ killings of Christian missionaries and their seizure of foreign property, eight imperialist powers sent armies to sack Beijing and massacre the Boxers. Mounting conflicts between these powers over the division of the spoils in China led ultimately to the bloody Japanese occupation of China in the 1930s and 1940s, which cost nearly 20 million lives, provoking the 1949 revolution that ended colonial rule over China.
In 1904, the Herero people in Namibia rose up against German colonial rule, killing more than 100 German settlers. The German army responded by carrying out the first genocide of the 20th century against the Herero, forcing them into deserts where they died of thirst, or imprisoning them in death camps prefiguring the extermination camps of the Nazi regime. In 2015, German officials formally acknowledged the genocide and offered a state apology.
Netanyahu’s regime and its imperialist allies are resorting to similar methods against Gaza. However, the great anti-colonial struggles of the 20th century that broke out after the Russian revolutions of 1905 and October 1917 did not take place in vain. Among masses of workers and youth internationally, Netanyahu’s barbaric methods provoke outrage. This opposition will grow as the monumental scale of the crimes being planned and committed against Gaza become evident to ever broader layers of workers and youth throughout the world.
The NATO powers’ other justification for backing Netanyahu’s crimes—that they are defending Jews and opposing antisemitism—is collapsing. In reality, they are supporting Netanyahu’s genocidal campaign against the Palestinians in a close alliance with political descendants of the forces that carried out the Holocaust.
As the capitalist ruling elites plunge into barbarism, a mass movement is emerging in the international working class. Protests against imperialism and Zionism are erupting amid mounting global struggles of the working class. Strikes against exploitation, austerity, inflation and police violence shook all the major imperialist powers this year and will intensify in the weeks and months ahead.
The liberation of Palestine is only possible in the context of the growth of a powerful socialist movement of the international working class, including within Israel itself. This will create the conditions for the overthrow of Zionist chauvinism and the unity of Palestinian and Israeli workers. The struggle against the war in Gaza must acquire a clear, anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist character, mobilizing the working class in a struggle for socialism across Palestine and the Middle East and internationally.”
In juxtaposition with this internationalist and revolutionary lens of vision are forces of reaction born of fear and trauma weaponized in service to power, the siren call of armed might and retribution as a form of security, but security is an illusion, and only love can reconcile these conflicted identities of Israeli and Palestinian and heal the systems of division and unequal power which are at the heart of this war which threatens to swallow us all.
As written by Yuval Noah Harari in The Guardian, in an article entitled Israelis and Palestinians are facing their moment of greatest danger since 1948: There is still a slim chance of peace if wiser counsels prevail and other major powers intervene in a coalition of the willing; “Israel has just experienced the worst day in its history. More Israeli civilians have been slaughtered in a single day than all the civilians and soldiers Israel lost in the 1956 Sinai war, the 1967 six-day war and the 2006 second Lebanon war combined. The stories and images coming out of the area occupied by Hamas are horrific. Many of my own friends and family members have suffered unspeakable atrocities. This means the Palestinians, too, are now facing immense danger. The most powerful country in the Middle East is livid with pain, fear and anger. I do not have either the knowledge or moral authority to speak about how things look from the Palestinian perspective. But in the moment of Israel’s greatest pain, I would like to issue a warning about how things look from the Israeli side of the fence.
Politics often works like a scientific experiment, conducted on millions of people with few ethical limitations. You try something – whether increasing the welfare budget, electing a populist president or making a peace offer – witness the results, and decide whether to proceed further down that particular path; or you reverse course and try something else. This is how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has unfolded for decades: by trial and error.
During the 1990s Oslo peace process, Israel gave peace a chance. I know that from the viewpoint of Palestinians and some outside observers, Israeli peace offers were insufficient and arrogant, but it was still the most generous offer Israel has ever made. During that peace process, Israel handed partial control of the Gaza Strip to the Palestinian Authority. The outcome for Israelis was the worst terror campaign they had experienced until then. Israelis are still haunted by memories of daily life in the early 2000s, with buses and restaurants bombed every day. That terror campaign killed not only hundreds of Israeli civilians, but also the peace process and the Israeli left. Maybe Israel’s peace offer wasn’t generous enough. But was terrorism the only possible response?
After the failure of the peace process, Israel’s next experiment in Gaza was disengagement. In the mid-2000s, Israel unilaterally retreated from the entire Gaza Strip, dismantled all settlements there and returned to the internationally recognised pre-1967 border. True, it continued to impose a partial blockade on the Gaza Strip and to occupy the West Bank. But the withdrawal from Gaza was still a very significant Israeli step, and Israelis waited anxiously to see what the result of that experiment would be. The remnants of the Israeli left hoped that the Palestinians would make an honest attempt to turn Gaza into a prosperous and peaceful city state, a Middle Eastern Singapore, showing to the world and to the Israeli right what the Palestinians could do when given the opportunity to govern themselves.
Sure, it is difficult to build a Singapore under a partial blockade. But an honest attempt could still have been made, in which case there would have been greater pressure on the Israeli government from both foreign powers and the Israeli public to remove the blockade from Gaza and to reach an honourable deal about the West Bank as well. Instead, Hamas took over the Gaza Strip and turned it into a terrorist base from which repeated attacks were launched on Israeli civilians. Another experiment ended in failure.
This completely discredited the remnants of the Israeli left, and brought to power Benjamin Netanyahu and his hawkish governments. Netanyahu pioneered another experiment. Since peaceful coexistence had failed, he adopted a policy of violent coexistence. Israel and Hamas traded blows on a weekly basis and almost every year there was a major military operation, but for a decade and a half, Israeli civilians could go on living within a few hundred metres from Hamas bases on the other side of the fence. Even Israel’s messianic zealots showed little zeal to reconquer the Gaza Strip, and even rightwingers hoped that the responsibilities involved in ruling more than 2 million people would gradually moderate Hamas.
Indeed, many on the Israeli right saw Hamas as a better partner than the Palestinian Authority. This was because Israeli hawks wanted to go on controlling the West Bank, and feared a peace deal. Hamas seemed to offer the Israeli right the best of all worlds: relieving Israel of the need to govern the Gaza Strip, without making any peace offers that might dislocate Israeli control of the West Bank. The day of horror Israel has just experienced signals the end of the Netanyahu experiment in violent coexistence.
So what comes next? No one knows for sure, but some voices in Israel are veering towards reconquering the Gaza Strip or bombing it to rubble. The result of such policy could be the worst humanitarian crisis the region has experienced since 1948. Especially if Hezbollah and Palestinian forces in the West Bank join the fray, the death toll could reach many thousands, with millions more driven from their homes. On both sides of the fence, there are religious fanatics fixated on divine promises and the 1948 war. Palestinians dream of reversing the outcome of that war. Jewish zealots like the finance minister Bezalel Smotrich have warned even Arab citizens of Israel that “you are here by mistake because Ben-Gurion [Israel’s first prime minister] didn’t finish the job in ’48 and didn’t kick you out”; 2023 could enable fanatics on both sides to pursue their religious fantasies, and re-stage the 1948 war with a vengeance.
Even if things don’t go to such extremes, the current conflict is likely to put the last nail in the coffin of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The kibbutzim along the Gaza border have been socialist communes and some of the most tenacious bastions of the Israeli left. I know people from those kibbutzim who, after years of almost daily rocket attacks from Gaza, still clung to the hope of peace, as if to a religious cult. These kibbutzim have just been obliterated, and some of the last peaceniks are either murdered, burying their loved ones, or held hostage in Gaza. For example, Vivian Silver, a peace activist from Kibbutz Be’eri who for years has been transporting ailing Gazans to Israeli hospitals, is missing and likely held hostage in Gaza.
What has already happened cannot be undone. The dead cannot be brought back to life, and the personal traumas will never completely heal. But we must prevent further escalation. Many of the forces in the region are currently led by irresponsible religious fanatics. External forces must therefore intervene to deescalate the conflict. Anyone who wishes for peace must unequivocally condemn the Hamas atrocities, put pressure on Hamas to immediately and unconditionally release all the hostages, and help deter Hezbollah and Iran from intervening. This would give Israelis a bit of breathing space and a tiny ray of hope.
Second, a coalition of the willing – ranging from the US and the EU to Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority – should take responsibility for the Gaza Strip away from Hamas, rebuild Gaza and simultaneously completely disarm Hamas and demilitarise the Gaza Strip.
There are only slim chances that these steps will be realised. But after the recent horrors, most Israelis don’t think they can live with anything less.”
As I wrote in my post of October 17 2023, Chaos Is the Great Hope of the Powerless: Case of the Hamas-Israel War; A wise friend has questioned my valorization of Chaos as a principle of change in the context of Black Saturday, a term which describes the Hamas attack on Israel and the immense forces of terror, death, destruction, fracture, grief, rage, and revenge it unleashed, becoming a single tide of darkness.
Thank you once again for your kindness and your wisdom.
In this moment of tragedy I am thinking of Chaos as a disruptive force of fracture and change which has stripped us bare of our ideologies to reveal the fragile humanity beneath, and may be leveraged for liberty or tyranny by how we respond as a species and global civilization. As Guillermo del Toro writes in Carnival Row, Chaos is the great hope of the powerless.
What do I hope for now, for the peoples of Israel and Palestine? That both may unite to free each other, but first we will need universal humanitarian aid to any one on either side of these lines of division, and a Reckoning for the war crimes of both Hamas and Israel. For Israel took the bait, and gave Hamas the victory; they are now equal as war criminals without legitimacy.
Israel took the bait, and the world is calling them out for war crimes; this may be end of the Netanyahu alt right regime and the dawn of a new Middle East. I was absolutely expecting Biden and allies to enable Israels Final Solution to the Palestinian Problem; in this I rejoice to be wrong about human nature. Maybe the idea of human rights is not dead. As my mother used to sing to students who asked her to make authorizing statements about anything, artifact of a Shakespeare in Thirty Minutes theatrical show that toured nationally with some of her students in it, bouncing her open hands left and right; Maybe, maybe not, Maybe, maybe not.
No one seems to have noticed publicly that this means Israeli intelligence has been infiltrated. It is also possible that unknown puppetmasters have infiltrated and seized control of both Hamas and Israel, for purposes which are unclear and antithetical to the interests and well being of either. We wander lost in a Wilderness of Mirrors, friends.
What Reckoning, for crimes against humanity by an organization of terror which has long been a vanguard of anticolonial revolutionary struggle under the imposed conditions of Occupation, slavery, and a genocidal Blockade?
Not the totalization of the general population of Palestinians in a genocidal campaign of ethnic cleansing as Netanyahu wishes and Hamas intends as a strategy of delegitimation of the Israel state in the moral equivalence of terror, for if Israel, her patron America, and the international community accept the terms of struggle offered by Hamas they too become organizations of terror, and Hamas wins.
This is a decolonial revolution, and victory goes to the side who can establish the legitimacy and moral supremacy of their story. As my father taught me, Never play someone else’s game.
Hamas also wishes in this provocation to weld the peoples of Gaza to them; this is a primary strategy of fascism and tyranny, to make the people in whose name you claim to act complicit in unforgiveable crimes. Always beware those who claim to speak and act in your name as a strategy of your subjugation.
A third layer of meaning here is the ambiguity of the geopolitical and world-historical forces beyond the Holy Land; Russia, her ally Iran and the Iranian Dominion of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, especially the Assad regime of Syria which has sent forces into Israel as a client state of Russia and Iran, and Hezbollah, which offers many of the social services of a government and may be in the process of emergence as an independent state, or a true empire in the transnational sense like the Holy Roman Empire. The great question here is; has Russia opened a new front of her plan of global conquest and made this a theatre of World War Three?
How does one answer all of this? How bring a Reckoning for the terror of Hamas without authorizing and becoming complicit in the greater terror of Israel’s looming genocide of the Palestinians?
The forms that might take give me pause, for they will determine our future, and though I know what I myself must do I do not like it, and am calling out here in my journals, where I work through the consequences of my decisions before acting on them, for unknown possibilities I myself cannot envision.
Yes, my friend, Chaos has profoundly destructive forms; death among them, ruin and civilizational collapse, the negation of all we have claimed as our identity, but all are also measures of the adaptive range of systems, and can give birth to new forms from this liberated energy. And as you point out, all forces operate in opposite directions at once, creating their own opposition. These are not moral forces in balance, but ambivalent forces which contain each other in recursion.
So, while our nations try to shatter each other’s truths with overwhelming force and mass terror, I must find a path of least force to salvage what I can of our humanity, and I hope I will not fail as I did at Mariupol and Panjshir.
This may be all we have as humans lost in chasms of darkness and a Wilderness of Mirrors, this refusal to abandon each other to dehumanization, but like our refusal to submit to authority it is a power which cannot be taken from us, even in imposed conditions of struggle designed to produce abjection and learned helplessness, or rage and tribalization as identity politics and the manufacture of consent to be fed into engines of death for the wealth, power, and privilege of hegemonic elites and tyrannies.
Such ephemeral and insubstantial things, like whispered prayers to abyssal unknowns, figments of love, hope, faith, which belong to the shadows, the delusions of grandeur of beasts harnessed to systems of oppression by others who yet dream that we might become more.
Dream with me.
Embrace our absurdity as flawed things wrestling with immense forces of falsification, commodification, and dehumanization in a mad quest to become human, under imposed conditions of struggle typified by atrocities designed to produce abjection, learned helplessness, and despair, as we are consumed by the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force in service to elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege whose primary weapon is division and hierarchies of belonging and exclusionary otherness as identity politics and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.
Against all of this we have only our solidarity with each other, the redemptive power of love, our refusal to submit or to believe and trust authority which frees us as Unconquered and self created beings and Living Autonomous Zones, and our poetic vision in the reimagination and transformation of ourselves. Powers which cannot be taken from us, and which can seize the power of those who would enslave us.
This is why I practice the art of believing impossible things, but only those I myself have chosen or created. And crucially, act to make them real. And in this case we must bring a Reckoning to the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity regardless of who they may be or in the name of what cause they act, and silence the drums of war.
Dream with me, but act in solidarity to make it real.
As the Mad Hatter says to Alice; “That is an excellent practice, but right now you might want to focus on the Jabberwock.”
Just so.
As I wrote in my post of March 10 2023, On Hope and Despair: Surviving Life Disruptive Events; To a friend with suicidal ideation and facing multiple trauma, life disruptive events, and institutional catch 22s which include class and patriarchal oppression enforced by rentier capitalism and the political theft of our right to life through failure to provide the universal healthcare which is its precondition, I have written this brief message:
Now is the time to reach out, make connections, and build community. Isolation is dangerous in the extreme for you in this moment. A sea of fellow humans surrounds us, all of whom must wrestle with the flaws of our humanity as imposed conditions of struggle. I hear you in this message, and am afraid. Choose life, my friend, as precarious and filled with pain and fear as it may be; our stories can always change, regardless of the limits of our scope of action and agency.
It may now become possible to reclaim the life which has been stolen from you, and begin to heal and reinvent yourself. May you find peace and joy in this terrible world, my friend.
All I have to offer in this are words, ephemeral and impermanent as leaves taking flight in the wind; a poor substitute for the golden coins which should be laid upon our eyes to bear us to unknown shores where we may be free from the limits of our form and the material basis of our lives under unequal power as imposed conditions of struggle.
We must struggle against such authoritarian forces of coercion as a universal process of becoming human, and against tyranny and terror our best defense is solidarity, loyalty, mutual aid and interdependence, faith in each other, and our duty of care for each other. If these should fail, those who would enslave us win.
A maker of mischief, I; and a bringer of Chaos, bearing songs of liberation. I cannot free us from the systems of unequal power which entrap us, but I can illuminate their limits, flaws, and internal contradictions which will inevitably bring about their collapse, and if we all of us act together we may seize our power to reimagine and transform our possibilities of becoming human and the choices we make about how to be human together.
And maybe one thing more; a spell, if you will, or a wish; I reach once more into Pandora’s Box to problematize and interrogate hope as a balance for despair.
As I wrote in my post of September 27 2020, What Do We Need Now to Forge A Future For Humankind?; We live in interesting times, a phrase attributed in popular culture as Chinese but coined by the father of Prime Minister Chamberlain in a speech of 1898, possibly a paraphrase of the line “Better to be a dog in times of tranquility than a human in times of chaos” in a short story of 1627 by Feng Menglong; beset by complex and interdependent problems; existential threats to democracy and to our survival as a species, and confronted by a political crisis of identity driven by pervasive and overwhelming fears and the modern pathology of disconnectedness. This is a moment of decision, with extinction and civilizational annihilation hanging in the balance, of the wonder and terror of total freedom, and our choices will gloriously expand the possibilities of becoming human or cast us into oblivion.
History begins with us, or ends with us.
What do we need now if we are to forge a future for humankind?
So I asked the question three years ago, which I revisit now to recontexualize the praxis of hope as historical and political as well as personal and psychological, one which shapes us both as individuals and as nations.
Here follows a Book of Hope, to balance against despair in surviving life disruptive events, the flaws of our humanity, and the brokenness of the world.
What is hope, and how is it useful?
Hope is power, an inherent and defining quality of human being, and a primary force of our reimagination and transformation of ourselves and our civilization.
Hope dances with faith and love as parts of us which cannot be taken from us, a final space of free creative play which escapes the darkness and those who would enslave us, beyond the boundaries of the Forbidden and resistant to our falsification, commodification, and dehumanization by authority and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege and their carceral states of force and control.
Hope is also a fulcrum of change not only for ourselves in becoming human, but also of seizures of power in revolutionary and liberation struggle, a form of poetic vision which allows us to see beyond the limits of our material and social conditions to diagnose systemic flaws and contradictions and find new ways of being human together.
These aspects of hope as recursive processes of change, adaptation, and growth in living systems, social, political, and psychological as well as biological ecologies which construct us, make of hope a kind of freedom inborn in us, and interconnected with ideas of agency, autonomy, and liberty.
How can we find the will and power to claw our way out of the ruins and make yet another Last Stand, beyond hope of victory or even survival? This has been the great question of my life posed by existential threats in the first three Last Stands which created and defined me; when the police opened fire on the student protestors my mother and I were among at Bloody Thursday in People’s Park Berkeley 1969, when I was nearly executed by police bounty hunters in Brazil in 1974 for refusal to stand aside from the street children they were authorized to kill for being who the system made them, and in Beirut 1982 when I was given the Oath of the Resistance by Jean Genet as we refused to surrender to the soldiers who had just set fire to our café and expected to be burned alive.
In my very long journey to becoming who I am now, I began from the position of Camus regarding hope that it is an instrument of our subjugation to authority through faith weaponized in service to power and the falsification of lies, illusions, rewritten histories, authorized identities, and alternate realities; the Wilderness of Mirrors, to use Angleton’s iconic metaphor. Hope for me then must be abandoned if we are to become free; with time I began to see instead hope as a form of freedom, one crucial to our defiance of authority and seizures of power.
First, here is the place from which I began, as I wrote in my post of August 20 2019, On Becoming Human; This morning I was rereading my favorite stories by H.P. Lovecraft on his birthday and writing some thoughts about his work in my literary blog, sister site to this one, when I realized that his surreal mythology illuminates the existential crisis of meaning and values which confronts us in America today and in the world at large in what is rapidly becoming a post-democracy global tyranny under the Fourth Reich, and that we have faced similar peril after both World Wars as western civilization destroyed and recreated itself; how can we go on when the values of the Enlightenment, freedom, equality, truth, and justice, have failed us? It is as if we looked to the heavens for signs and portents of guidance, only to find writ large the words, “I do not exist.”
One’s interpretation of a universe empty of meaning and value except for that which we ourselves create, a Nietzschean cosmos of dethroned gods as explored by Sartre and Marx or a Lovecraftian one of Absurdist faith, referential to classical sources, of mad, idiot gods who are also malign, tyrannical, and hostile to humanity, ideal figures of Trump and his lunatic presidency of Absurdist-Nihilist Theatre of Cruelty, rests with our solution to the riddle of Pandora’s Box; is hope a gift, or the most terrible of evils?
Hope is a two- edged sword; it frees us and opens limitless possibilities, but in severing the bonds of history also steals from us our anchorages and disempowers the treasures of our past as shaping forces. Hope in its negative form directs us toward a conservative project of finding new gods to replace the fallen as we so often do with liberators who become tyrants, or like T.S. Elliot of gathering up and reconstructing our traditions as a precondition of faith. This is why the abandonment of hope is vital to Sartrean authenticity and to the rebellion of Camus; we must have no gods and no masters before we are free to own ourselves. The gates of Dante’s Hell, which bear the legend “Abandon hope, all ye who enter here,” lead to ourselves and to our own liberation.
True freedom requires disbelief. Freedom means self-ownership and the smashing of the idols.
Freedom can be terrible as well as wonderful. Among the most impactful stories I ever heard from my mother was how she went to the grocery store after my father died and experienced a full stop lightningbolt awakening, thinking, “What do I want? I know what my husband wanted, what my children want, but I don’t know what I want.”
It is in this moment in which we claim our nothingness that we free ourselves of all claims upon us, a transformative rebirth in which we become self-created beings.
Now imagine humanity after civilization destroyed itself twice in the last century’s world wars facing that same awakening to freedom and to loss, wherein our old values have betrayed us and must be forged anew, and we are bereft of signposts in an undiscovered country, exactly the same as a widow on her first trip shopping for dinner for no one but herself.
Our responses to this awakening to possibilities tend to correspond with one of the primary shaping forces of historical civilization; the conserving force as exemplified by T.S. Eliot, Thomas Mann, Vladimir Nabokov, and Flannery O’Connor, and the revolutionary force as exemplified by Gertrude Stein, James Joyce, Jean Paul Sartre, and Samuel Beckett.
Everyone possesses and uses both forces just as all organisms do in terms of their evolution. The function of conservatism is to buffer order from the shock of the new and withstand stresses and changing conditions without losing ourselves or undergoing morphogenic change, the loss of identity, or ruptures to our prochronism, the history of our successful adaptations and strategies of survival as expressed in our form, the loss of our culture and traditions. The function of revolution and innovation is to capitalize on chaos as adaptive potential and to transform, create, and discover new forms, meanings, and values.
For both nations and persons, the process of identity formation is the same. We all have one problem in common as we grow up; each of us must reinvent how to be human. This individuation is controlled by a second or historical principle; humans create themselves over time, and a third or social principle; humans create each other through their connections. And this tertiary principle, which concerns our interconnectedness and social frames, can produce conflicts with the secondary principle of memory and history.
This is the first revolution in which we all must fight; the struggle for ownership and control of identity or persona, a term derived from the masks of Greek theatre, between the masks that others make for us and the ones we make for ourselves.
As I wrote in my post of January 20 2021, The Turning of the Tide: With Inauguration Day Comes the Return of Hope; I have a complex relationship with the idea of hope, with the ambiguity, relativity, and context-determined multiple truths and simultaneity of meaning which defines hope, that thing of redemption and transformative power which remains in Pandora’s Box after all the evils have escaped, as either the most terrible of our nightmares or the gift of the miraculous depending on how we use it.
As the Wizard of Oz said of himself it’s a humbug, but it is also a power which cannot be taken from us by force and control, and like faith of which it is a cipher holds open the door of our liberation and the limitless possibilities of becoming human.
As we believe, so we may become.
Human being, meaning, and value originate in this uniquely human capacity to transcend and grow beyond our limits as an act of transformation, rebirth, and self-creation, and as a seizure of power over our identities. Among other things it allows us to escape the flag of our skin and inhabit that of others; to forge bonds through empathy and compassion and enact altruism and mercy.
This is what is most human in us, a quality which defines the limits of what is human, and which we must cherish and conserve as our most priceless gift.
Hope is the thing which can restore us to ourselves and each other, unite a divided nation and begin to heal our legacies of historical inequalities and injustices, and it can be wielded as an instrument which counters fear. Hope is the balance of fear, and fear is a negative space of hope; and because fear births hate, racism, fascism, hierarchies of elite privilege and belonging and categories of exclusionary otherness, hope is a power of liberation and of revolutionary struggle.
As I wrote in my post of July 26 2020, Explaining Badly What I Do, For Even I Am Not Altogether Certain: a Confession; One day I crossed beyond our topologies of meaning and value and transgressed the boundaries of the Forbidden into the unknown, the blank places on the maps of our becoming marked Here Be Dragons, and never returned. I live now where the dragons dwell, and I wouldn’t trade a moment of the life I have lived for any treasure on earth, for I am free.
It happened like this; one day I was driving from my fun job teaching high school to my real work counseling at my very elegant office in San Francisco, and I thought, Why am I doing this? I don’t need to do this. So I took a wrong turn to the airport and bought a ticket to the other side of the earth. I had no idea where I was flying to, and when I arrived in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia I found a bus station with a map that showed all the routes ending in the mountains, which were an enormous empty space along the spine of the country. So I took a bus there and got off at the end of the road, where a dirt track led into the forest of the Cameron Highlands, and began walking.
Sometimes my quest found only death and loss, sometimes triumph and illumination, but the struggle itself was always a seizure of power in which something human could be wrested back from the claws of our nothingness.
Among the prizes and exhibits of my memory palace are heroes and rogues, allies and enemies of whom only I, like Ishmael, live to tell the tale; others became legends. So also with the causes for which we fought.
What if we told students what life is really like, that its full of blood and horror and in the end means nothing at all, and the best you can do is survive another day and maybe save someone from the darkness before it swallows us all? I’ve looked into the darkness since 1982 in Beirut, when Jean Genet swore me to the Oath of the Resistance before his capture and imprisonment by Israel, and as Nietzsche warned it has begun to look back at me.
Yet I will struggle with the darkness and cease not, and so remain unconquered in defiance of unjust authority and in refusal to submit, though I have long forgotten why. At moments of doubt such as this I read again Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus, Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, Henley’s Invictus, I.F. Stone’s The Trial of Socrates; myths, stories, poetry, and history of the grandeur of resistance which confers freedom, beyond hope of victory or even survival.
Pandora’s Box bears a last gift which is also a curse; we cling to it when it is all we have, and because it cannot be taken from us. I have never been able to decide if this is a good thing or not. Why has this strange gift been given to us?
Maybe it’s only this; that so long as we get back to our feet for yet another last stand, there is hope.
And so I open the Forbidden Door to the unknown and step through as I have many times before, a nameless shadow among countless others who await in welcome all those who dare to transgress the limits unjustly imposed on us, a realm of shadows and of the unconquered, and like lions we roar our defiance into the fathoms of emptiness beyond.
Tonight the shadows dance, wild and free, bound by no rules but our own; come and dance with us.
Leonard Cohen – Hallelujah (Live In London)
This Day We Fight: Aragorn’s Speech at the Black Gate
Confronting the Jabberwock
‘We all share the same pain’: can the Israeli-Palestinian peace movement rebuild after 7 October?
Gaza Draws Closer To Total Collapse With Humanitarian Aid Blocked At Egyptian Border: As Israel prepared a likely ground offensive into Gaza that would mean deadly house-to-house fighting, fears rose over the conflict spreading.
Our friend, the Abyss, and my Kit For Hope; a reading list
At moments of doubt such as this I read again Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus, Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea, Henley’s Invictus, I.F. Stone’s The Trial of Socrates; myths, stories, poetry, and history of the grandeur of resistance which confers freedom.
1 במאי 2024 אימה ייאוש מאכזב: לשרוד את טרור האין שלנו ביקום ללא משמעות או ערך
במראה של עזה התהום מביטה אלינו לאחור, ואנחנו שבויים בדימויי בית השעשועים המעוותים של ישראל ואמריקה, שרידי חלומות כמקלט של המנודים והערבים לזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו, ושל המפלצות שהפכנו להיות עכשיו.
אני לא יכול לזהות דבר בדמויות העומדות מולנו, ולמרות שאני מטיל התרסה על תהומות החושך האינסופיות, המילים שלי אינן מוצאות גבול ואינן מחזירות הדים, כאילו נטרפות על ידי הכלום.
ובכל זאת אני לא מובס על ידי הכוח המכריע והאימה של הסמכות וגם לא כפוף על ידי ייאוש וחוסר אונים מלומד, כי זה המרחב שבו אני חי, האימה הזו, השמחה הזו, החופש הזה.
כפי שאמר לי ז’אן ז’נה ב-1982 בזמן המצור על ביירות, במטרה אבודה, בבית בוער, בתקופה של חושך גדול; “כשאין תקווה, אנו חופשיים לעשות דברים בלתי אפשריים, דברים מפוארים.”
אני מקווה שזה יישאר נכון, לכולנו בעודנו נאבקים לצאת ממורשת ההיסטוריה שלנו ולתפוס את כוחנו ממערכות דיכוי, כי זו המשימה הגדולה של להיות אנושיים, באופן כללי ובאירוע שער ראשמון הזה עכשיו נפרש ברפיח ובמקומות אחרים; לחלום דברים בלתי אפשריים ולהפוך אותם לאמיתיים.
יש כמה דברים שצריכים להיות נכונים גם אם הם מעולם לא היו, גם אם קיטס טעה ומציאת דבר יפה לא הופך את זה לכזה, גם אם תומס מאן צדק ואהבה לא יכולה לגאול שום דבר, גם אם כפי שחשש טולקין הגענו. בשער השחור ללא קשרי אחווה שיאחדו אותנו, גם אם כמו קאמי, עלינו לצאת מהחורבות כדי לעשות עוד עמדה אחרונה, מעבר לתקווה לניצחון או אפילו הישרדות.
אין ישראלים, אין פלסטינים; רק אנשים כמו עצמנו, והבחירות שהם עושים לגבי איך להיות בני אדם ביחד.
מה אנחנו שווים אם נאפשר למלכים שודדים חסרי רחמים לבצע זוועות, לבזוז ולשעבד אחרים?
מה שווה הציוויליזציה המערבית, אם לא נעמוד במילים היפות שלנו? ומילים יפות הן נשארות, כמו אלה שכתב תומס ג’פרסון בהצהרת העצמאות ב-1776, סינתזה ותיקון של רעיונות מהובס, לוק, מונטסקייה, וולטייר ורוסו; “אנו מאמינים כי האמיתות הללו מובנות מאליהן, שכל בני האדם נבראו שווים, וניחנו על ידי יוצרם בזכויות מסוימות שאינן ניתנות לביטול, שביניהן חיים, חירות והרדיפה אחר האושר.”
מהי אמריקה, אם לא ערבה לדמוקרטיה ולזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו, ומגדלור של תקווה לעולם?
מהי ישראל, אם לא מקלט לחסרי הכוח והמנושלים, המושתקים והנמחקים, כל אלה שפרנץ פאנון כינה עלובי האדמה, ביניהם העם הדמוני והנרדף ביותר בהיסטוריה האנושית, היהודים?
הבה נשיב במילים שנכתבו על ידי J.R.R. טולקין בין 1937 ל-1955 בדמיונו המחודש והזוהר של מלחמת העולם השנייה בנאום האיקוני של אראגורן בשער השחור ב”שיבת המלך” המאחד אתוס, לוגו, פאתוס וקאירוס; “ייתכן שיבוא יום שבו אומץ לבם של בני אדם ייכשל, בו אנו נוטשים את חברינו ונשבור את כל קשרי האחווה, אבל זה לא היום הזה. שעה של זאבים ומגנים מנותצים, כשעידן הגברים מתרסק, אבל זה לא היום הזה. היום אנחנו נלחמים”.
הצטרף אלינו.
Arabic
21 مايو 2024 الذل واليأس الرعب: النجاة من رعب العدم في كون بلا معنى أو قيمة
في مرآة غزة تنظر إلينا الهاوية، ونحن أسرى الصور المشوهة لإسرائيل وأمريكا، وبقايا أحلام ملجأ المنبوذين والضامنة لحقوقنا الإنسانية العالمية، والوحوش التي أصبحنا عليها الآن.
لا أستطيع التعرف على أي شيء في الأشكال التي تواجهنا، وعلى الرغم من أنني ألقي التحدي في هوة الظلام التي لا نهاية لها، فإن كلماتي لا تجد حدودًا ولا ترد أي أصداء، كما لو أن العدم يلتهمها.
ومع ذلك، فأنا لم أهزم من قبل القوة الساحقة ورعب السلطة، ولم أخضع لليأس والعجز المكتسب، لأن هذا هو الفضاء الذي أعيش فيه، هذا الرعب، هذا الفرح، هذه الحرية.
وكما قال لي جان جينيه عام 1982 أثناء حصار بيروت، في قضية خاسرة، في منزل محترق، في زمن ظلام دامس؛ “عندما لا يكون هناك أمل، نكون أحرارًا في القيام بأشياء مستحيلة، أشياء مجيدة.”
آمل أن يظل هذا صحيحًا، بالنسبة لنا جميعًا ونحن نكافح للخروج من تراث تاريخنا والاستيلاء على قوتنا من أنظمة القمع، فهذه هي المهمة العظيمة المتمثلة في أن نصبح بشرًا، بشكل عام وفي حدث بوابة راشومون الآن وتتكشف في رفح وأماكن أخرى؛ أن نحلم بأشياء مستحيلة ونجعلها حقيقية.
هناك بعض الأشياء التي يجب أن تكون حقيقية حتى لو لم تكن كذلك أبدًا، حتى لو كان كيتس مخطئًا والعثور على شيء جميل لا يجعله كذلك، حتى لو كان توماس مان على حق والحب لا يمكنه تعويض أي شيء، حتى لو كنا قد وصلنا كما كان تولكين يخشى عند البوابة السوداء مع عدم وجود روابط أخوة توحدنا، حتى لو كان علينا، كما فعل كامو، أن نشق طريقنا للخروج من الأنقاض للقيام بمواجهة أخيرة أخرى، بعيدًا عن الأمل في النصر أو حتى البقاء.
لا يوجد إسرائيليون ولا فلسطينيون؛ فقط الأشخاص مثلنا، والخيارات التي يتخذونها حول كيفية أن نكون بشرًا معًا.
ماذا نستحق إذا سمحنا لملوك قطاع الطرق القساة بارتكاب الفظائع ونهب واستعباد الآخرين؟
ما قيمة الحضارة الغربية إذا لم نرتقي إلى مستوى كلماتنا الجميلة؟ وتبقى كلمات جميلة، مثل تلك التي كتبها توماس جيفرسون في إعلان الاستقلال عام 1776، وهي عبارة عن تجميع ومراجعة لأفكار هوبز، ولوك، ومونتسكيو، وفولتير، وروسو؛ “إننا نعتبر هذه الحقائق بديهية، وهي أن جميع البشر خلقوا متساوين، ومنحهم خالقهم حقوقًا معينة غير قابلة للتصرف، ومن بينها الحياة والحرية والسعي وراء السعادة.”
ما هي أميركا إن لم تكن ضامنة للديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان العالمية، ومنارة أمل للعالم؟
ما هي إسرائيل، إن لم تكن ملجأ للضعفاء والمحرومين، والمُسكتين والممحيين، وكل أولئك الذين أطلق عليهم فرانز فانون اسم “المعذبون في الأرض”، ومن بينهم أكثر الناس شيطنة واضطهادًا في تاريخ البشرية، أي اليهود؟
دعونا نرد بالكلمات التي كتبها جي آر آر. تولكين بين عامي 1937 و1955 في إعادة تصوره المضيء للحرب العالمية الثانية في خطاب أراجورن الشهير عند البوابة السوداء في عودة الملك الذي يوحد الروح، والشعارات، والشفقة، والكايروس؛ “قد يأتي يوم تفشل فيه شجاعة الرجال، ونتخلى عن أصدقائنا ونكسر كل روابط الصداقة، لكن هذا ليس هذا اليوم. ساعة الذئاب والدروع المحطمة، عندما ينهار عصر البشر، لكن ليس هذا اليوم. هذا اليوم سنقاتل.”
When Israel speaks to me in my dreams as if the voice of history were that of one human being, it wears not the face of an iconic survivor of the Holocaust and liberator of humankind from the existential threats of tyranny and terror and the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force which it once may have, but of the character of Martin Chatwin in the series The Magicians, a victim of monstrous abuse who by seizure of power became himself a monster.
He has a line which like a Zen riddle enfolds and typifies what for myself is the primary question of how to become human under imposed conditions of struggle which require the use of force in resistance, where the use of social force is always ambiguous, dehumanizing, and obeys Newton’s Third Law of Motion as bidirectional forces of reaction which create their own antithesis. “You know, when I was a boy, a man who was meant to care for me bent me over his desk and had me over and over every time I was alone with him. It helps me understand a truth. You’re powerful or you’re weak.”
Here is the original lie of the tyrant and the fascist in the apologetics and self-justification of power; the lie that only power has meaning, that there is no good or evil. How we use power is of equal importance as who holds it. Fear and force are a primary means of human exchange, but not the only means; love, membership, and belonging are as important. The great question which democracy attempts to answer is how to balance the rights and needs of individuals so that none may infringe upon another’s.
It’s a line which captures perfectly the inherent contradictions of the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force as an origin of evil; for the use of social force is subversive of its own values. Yet the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle often require violence, and until the gods of law and order have been cast down from their thrones I must agree with the famous dictum of Sartre in his 1948 play Dirty Hands, quoted by Frantz Fanon in his 1960 speech Why We Use Violence, and made immortal by Malcolm X; “by any means necessary.”
As written by Walter Rodney in The Groundings with my Brothers; “We were told that violence in itself is evil, and that, whatever the cause, it is unjustified morally. By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master? By what standards can we equate the violence of blacks who have been oppressed, suppressed, depressed and repressed for four centuries with the violence of white fascists. Violence aimed at the recovery of human dignity and at equality cannot be judged by the same yardstick as violence aimed at maintenance of discrimination and oppression.”
And here is the passage he references from Leon Trotsky in Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice; “A slave-owner who through cunning and violence shackles a slave in chains, and a slave who through cunning or violence breaks the chains – let not the contemptible eunuchs tell us that they are equals before a court of morality!”
Yet in reflection I think of those great figures who have been both heroes of liberation and villains of tyranny; Napoleon, Washington, Stalin, Mao, Ortega, Mugabe, the list is a near endless litany of woes and failures of vision wherein Brave New Worlds became hells and carceral states. In evidence I offer the states they founded; Imperial France, America, the Soviet Union, the Chinese Communist Party, and above all the state of Israel, a dream of refuge forged in the terror of the Holocaust whose victims learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis and assumed their role in the Occupation of Palestine. David Ben-Gurion was by any reasonable interpretation the Messiah, for he won Israel as a place of refuge and belonging after centuries of Exile and the Jewish peoples of the whole world being claimed by no state since the fall of al-Andalus in 1492; but this was little consolation for those who died beneath the tracks of his tanks. The dangers of Idealism are very real; but so are the dangers of submission to authority and the complicity of silence in the face of evil.
I am a hunter of fascists, and mine is a hunter’s morality. For me there is a simple test for the use of force; who holds power?
During the many happy years in which I taught Forensics at Sonoma Valley High School, I began each new year on the first day of class with a demonstration I called Becoming a Fulcrum; placing an object on my desk with the worlds “This is a fulcrum.” Then setting an oblong object on top of that, “It balances a lever. When your parents ask you what you’re learning in Forensics class, tell them you’re learning to become a fulcrum, and change the balance of power in the world.”
It remains a reasonable mission statement in life, and I place my life in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon named The Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.
We who hunt monsters must remember always Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”
In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.
As I wrote in my post of May 29 2021, Palestine and Israel: State of the Peace; A fragile peace holds for now in the volatile, chaotic, and rapidly changing relationships between Palestine and Israel, and between these partners in the imaginations of America and the international community. It is an uneasy dance of identity, memory, and history performed to the lyrical songs of narratives of victimization and endless litanies of woe, songs which seduce and shape us to the service of power and authority.
Before the stage of the world and the witness of history, we can see here in real time the processes and consequences of divisions of exclusionary otherness and hierarchies of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege as primary informing, motivating, and shaping forces of human being, meaning, and value.
For those of us who participated on May 10 2021 and in the nineteen days of battle which followed not in the defense of al Aqsa, a thing of grandeur fit for the death of heroes, but in defense of the families at prayer which Israel attacked and the unarmed women and children hunted through the maze of a derelict antiquity, disembodied screams in a land of fear and darkness, the Third Intifada was born on that night as a hope beyond the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity for reimagination, transformation, the redemptive power of love to heal the divisions of exclusionary otherness and the pathology of our disconnectedness, and the limitless possibilities of becoming human.
What is the state of the peace? How we answer this question hinges on implicit value judgements and becomes a Rashomon Gate of relative truths, and a measure of our character. In this as in many things, I recall Monet’s description of the meaning of his art as a form of metaphysics and investigation into the soul of humankind; “Man has two eyes through which he sees the world; one looks outward, but the other looks inward, and it is the juxtaposition of these two images which creates the world we see.”
So our question becomes, what does this look like from the perspectives of its partners, Palestine, Israel, and America?
America vacillates with Joe Biden on the cusp of a vast and horrific realization; that we have for over seventy years been the sponsors of tyranny and state terror, and responsibility for the endless litany of woes which have shaped the peoples of Palestine are shared by all of us and by our proxy state of Israel. It parallels our national reckoning with the legacies of slavery and our systemic racial inequalities and injustices which awaken with the Black Lives Matter protests, like our reckoning with Patriarchy and sexual terror in the #metoo movement, and with the consequences of capitalism for our extinction in the Green New Deal of our champions Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders and the global ecological movement led by the Pythian visionary Greta Thunberg.
An awakening and tidal change whose full consequences and potential for the reimagination and transformation of humankind are incalculable, our political, ecological-material, sexual, and racial social justice movements represent a total civilizational shift and a revolution in universal human rights which will one day utterly change and renew our ideas of human being, meaning, and value.
Francis Fukuyama was wrong when he predicted that we live at the end of history; we live at the beginning of a new history. But he was exactly right when he diagnosed its principles of operation in The End of History and the Last Man; “It was the slave’s continuing desire for recognition that was the motor which propelled history forward, not the idle complacency and unchanging self-identity of the master.”
I hope we are at the beginnings of becoming human. I fear that our historical legacies may become traps, falsifications, assimilative and colonizing narratives wherein tyrannies of authorized identities may steal our souls. This is the problem of the Hobgoblin’s broken mirror in Anderson’s The Snow Queen; we are lost in a world of distorted images, captured echoes, and illusions. This, too, we must resist.
Israel is caught in the jaws of its history, held captive by Netanyahu’s regime of kleptocratic fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, but also a victim which has become a dark mirror of her abuser. Israel has learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis; fear, power, and force are not the only things which have meaning and are real, nor do we live in a world wherein love is without redemptive power.
In his massive campaign of ethnic cleansing and repression of dissent, and in his diplomacy of terror and negotiations by missile fire, Netanyahu plays to his own alt-right constituents as their figurehead. But he may have miscalculated international reactions; he has been provoked into exposing the true nature of the Occupation, and the White Hat conferred by narratives of historical victimization is slipping.
The Third Intifada has accomplished its goals of changing the narrative, fracturing American support for Israeli militarism and advancing support for Boycott, Divestiture, and Sanction, moving a decades old issue to center stage, and timed to the vote on the massive arms deal now in Congress. Thus for the American Front of the Intifada; in the Israeli Front we have also shifted the narrative toward delegitmation of the Netanyahu regime in support of the democracy and peace movements of the people of Israel, of the Occupation, and of the ideology of Zionism. At least, those were my goals in the wake of our defense of the people of Palestine at al Aqsa.
Others among the defenders of Palestine have their own plans and objectives; certainly Hamas emerged as the clear victor of the struggle, having seized authority from the Fatah government of Palestine through active defense of its people, and rendering the elections Abbas refuses to call irrelevant. Hamas has delegitimized the Palestinian Authority, and stained its partnership with the Israeli government as collaboration, while the Third Intifada, waged by Hamas but also dozens of other factions, special forces from a number of allied governments, and madmen like myself, has called into question the idea of the Two State Solution.
Of Hamas and of all revolutionaries I say this; Any who stand between the tyranny and state terror of conquest, enslavement, and death, and the lives of innocents are heroes and champions of our humanity. The particulars are irrelevant.
Are we not our brother’s keepers?
There is a path forward beyond the dichotomous paradigm of a dual identity; abandon the Two State Solution and reimagine and transform Israel and Palestine as a united nation under secular law and designed to safeguard equality and universal human rights.
America’s enormous financial and military sponsorship of the state of Israel provides a very big lever with which to change the balance of power. I advocate Boycott, Divestiture, and Sanction of the state of Israel when it means peace and demilitarization; we must fund and shape ourselves to constructive and not destructive ends, to love rather than hate and to hope rather than fear.
Build democracy in Israel and we also build justice and equality for its minorities, exactly as in America. I believe we must liberate the peoples of Israel from a fascist regime of blood, faith, and soil, for the beneficiaries of state terror and tyranny are also subjugated by it. This is the great internal contradiction of authoritarian power as fascism; it is a system which dehumanizes and instrumentalizes even those in whose name it perpetrates its crimes against humanity as a strategy of authorization and the manufacture of consent, and why it must inevitably consume itself.
As Israel prepares its Final Solution to the problem of Palestine, America does nothing. Nothing to stop crimes against humanity, and everything to provide the criminals with arms and other support. We bear responsibility for these crimes with our proxies in Israel.
The people who lived near the Nazi death camps claimed they knew nothing of the Holocaust, nothing about the vast rain of human ash which blanketed their towns and stained them with its silent crimes. But we know. How shall we answer, when we knew and did nothing?
The Magicians: Fear, Power, Force, the Origins of Evil and the Carceral State as Embodied Violence
0 مايو 2024 أصول الشر في الخوف والقوة والقوة: أسئلة وجودية في ظل الإبادة الجماعية الإسرائيلية للفلسطينيين بينما لا يفعل العالم شيئًا لإسكات أمطار الموت
عندما تتحدث إلي إسرائيل في أحلامي كما لو كان صوت التاريخ صوت إنسان واحد ، فإنها لا ترتدي وجه أحد الناجين الأيقونيين من المحرقة ومحرر البشرية من التهديدات الوجودية للاستبداد والإرهاب وحلقة واغنريان. الخوف والقوة والقوة التي قد تكون موجودة في السابق ، ولكن من شخصية مارتن شاتوين في سلسلة The Magicians ، ضحية الإساءة الوحشية التي أصبحت من خلال الاستيلاء على السلطة وحشًا.
لديه سطر مثل لغز زن يطوى ويشير إلى ما هو السؤال الأساسي بالنسبة لي كيف أصبح إنسانًا في ظل ظروف كفاح مفروضة تتطلب استخدام القوة في المقاومة ، حيث يكون استخدام القوة الاجتماعية دائمًا غامضًا ، وغير إنساني ، ويطيع قانون نيوتن الثالث للحركة كقوى رد فعل ثنائية الاتجاه تخلق نقيضًا خاصًا بها. “كما تعلم ، عندما كنت صبيًا ، قام الرجل الذي كان من المفترض أن يعتني بي بثني على مكتبه وجعلني مرارًا وتكرارًا في كل مرة كنت وحدي معه. إنها تساعدني على فهم الحقيقة. أنت قوي أو ضعيف “.
هذه هي الكذبة الأصلية للطاغية والفاشي في الدفاع عن السلطة والتبرير الذاتي ؛ الكذبة القائلة بأن القوة وحدها لها معنى ، أنه لا يوجد خير أو شر. إن كيفية استخدامنا للقوة لها نفس أهمية من يحتفظ بها. الخوف والقوة هما وسيلتان أساسيتان للتبادل البشري ، لكنهما ليسا الوسيلة الوحيدة ؛ الحب والعضوية والانتماء لا تقل أهمية. السؤال الكبير الذي تحاول الديمقراطية الإجابة عنه هو كيفية الموازنة بين حقوق واحتياجات الأفراد بحيث لا يتعدى أحد على حقوق الآخرين.
إنه الخط الذي يلتقط تمامًا التناقضات المتأصلة في حلقة واغنري من الخوف والقوة والقوة كأصل للشر ؛ لأن استخدام القوة الاجتماعية هو تخريب لقيمها الخاصة. ومع ذلك ، غالبًا ما تتطلب الشروط المفروضة للنضال الثوري العنف ، وحتى يتم التخلص من آلهة القانون والنظام من عروشهم ، يجب أن أتفق مع القول المأثور الشهير لسارتر في مسرحيته الأيدي القذرة عام 1948 ، التي اقتبسها فرانتز فانون في خطابه عام 1960 لماذا نستخدم العنف ، وجعلنا مالكولم إكس خالدة ؛ “بأي وسيلة ضرورية.”
كما كتبه والتر رودني في The Groundings مع إخوتي ؛ لقد قيل لنا أن العنف في حد ذاته شرير ، وأنه مهما كان السبب ، فهو غير مبرر أخلاقيا. بأي معيار أخلاقي يمكن اعتبار العنف الذي يستخدمه العبد لكسر قيوده هو نفسه عنف سيد العبيد؟ بأي معايير يمكننا أن نساوي عنف السود الذين تعرضوا للقمع والقمع والاكتئاب والقمع لأربعة قرون بعنف الفاشيين البيض. لا يمكن الحكم على العنف الذي يهدف إلى استعادة الكرامة الإنسانية وتحقيق المساواة بنفس المعيار الذي يحكم عليه العنف الذي يهدف إلى الحفاظ على التمييز والقمع “.
وهذا هو المقطع الذي يشير إليه من ليون تروتسكي في أخلاقهم وأخلاقنا: الأسس الطبقية للممارسة الأخلاقية ؛ “مالك العبيد الذي يقيد عبدًا بالسلاسل من خلال المكر والعنف ، والعبد الذي يكسر القيود عن طريق الماكرة أو العنف – دعنا لا يخبرنا الخصيان الحقير أنهم متساوون أمام محكمة الأخلاق!”
ومع ذلك ، أفكر في التفكير في أولئك الشخصيات العظيمة الذين كانوا أبطال التحرير وأشرار الاستبداد. نابليون ، واشنطن ، ستالين ، ماو ، القائمة هي عبارة عن سلسلة لا نهاية لها من الويلات وإخفاقات الرؤية حيث أصبحت عوالم جديدة شجاعة جحيماً وحالات جسدية. بالدليل أقدم الدول التي أسسوها ؛ الإمبراطورية الفرنسية ، أمريكا ، الاتحاد السوفيتي ، الحزب الشيوعي الصيني ، وقبل كل شيء دولة إسرائيل ، حلم ملجأ مزور في رعب الهولوكوست الذي تعلم ضحاياه الدروس الخاطئة من النازيين واضطلعوا بدورهم في احتلال فلسطين. كان ديفيد بن غوريون ، بأي تفسير معقول ، هو المسيح ، لأنه فاز بإسرائيل كمكان للجوء والانتماء بعد قرون من المنفى ولم تطالب دولة اليهود بأي دولة منذ سقوط الأندلس عام 1492 ؛ لكن هذا لم يكن عزاءًا لمن ماتوا تحت آثار دباباته. إن مخاطر المثالية حقيقية للغاية. ولكن كذلك هي مخاطر الخضوع للسلطة والتواطؤ في الصمت في مواجهة الشر.
أنا صياد للفاشيين ، وأخلاقي صياد. بالنسبة لي هناك اختبار بسيط لاستخدام القوة. من يملك السلطة؟
خلال السنوات العديدة السعيدة التي قمت فيها بتدريس الطب الشرعي في مدرسة سونوما فالي الثانوية ، بدأت كل عام جديد في اليوم الأول من الفصل بعرض أسميه “أن تصبح نقطة انطلاق”. وضع شيء على مكتبي مع العالمين “هذه نقطة ارتكاز”. ثم وضع جسم مستطيل فوق ذلك ، “إنه يوازن ذراعًا. عندما يسألك والداك عما تتعلمه في فصل الطب الشرعي ، أخبرهم أنك تتعلم أن تصبح نقطة ارتكاز وتغيير ميزان القوى في العالم “.
يبقى بيان مهمة معقولاً في الحياة ، وأنا أضع حياتي في الميزان مع كل أولئك الذين فرانتس فانون نا
29 مايو 2021 فلسطين وإسرائيل: دولة السلام
يصمد السلام الهش في الوقت الحالي في العلاقات المتقلبة والفوضوية والمتغيرة بسرعة بين فلسطين وإسرائيل ، وبين هؤلاء الشركاء في تصورات أمريكا والمجتمع الدولي. إنها رقصة مضطربة للهوية والذاكرة والتاريخ تؤدى على الأغاني الغنائية لروايات الضحية ، الأغاني التي تغرينا وتشكلنا لخدمة السلطة والسلطة.
قبل مرحلة العالم وشهادة التاريخ ، يمكننا أن نرى هنا في الوقت الفعلي عمليات وعواقب انقسامات الآخر الإقصائي والتسلسل الهرمي لنخبة الهيمنة في الثروة والسلطة والامتياز باعتبارها قوى إعلام وتحفيز وتشكيل أساسية لـ الإنسان والمعنى والقيمة.
لأولئك منا الذين شاركوا في 10 مايو ليس في الدفاع عن الأقصى ، شيء من العظمة يصلح لموت الأبطال ، ولكن دفاعا عن العائلات في الصلاة التي هاجمتها إسرائيل والنساء والأطفال العزل الذين اصطادوا في متاهة من العصور القديمة المهجورة ، صرخات بلا جسد في أرض الخوف والظلام ، ولدت الانتفاضة الثالثة في تلك الليلة كأمل يتجاوز كسر العالم وعيوب إنسانيتنا من أجل إعادة التخيل ، والتحول ، والقوة التعويضية للحب للشفاء. الانقسامات حول الآخر الإقصائي وعلم أمراض انفصالنا ، والإمكانيات اللامحدودة لأن نصبح بشرًا.
ما هي حالة السلام؟ كيف نجيب على هذا السؤال يتوقف على الأحكام القيمية الضمنية ويصبح بوابة راشومون للحقائق النسبية ، ومقياس لشخصيتنا. في هذا كما هو الحال في العديد من الأشياء ، أتذكر وصف مونيه لمعنى فنه كشكل من أشكال الميتافيزيقيا والبحث في روح البشرية ؛ “للإنسان عينان يرى العالم من خلالها. أحدهما ينظر إلى الخارج ، والآخر ينظر إلى الداخل ، وهذا التقاء هاتين الصورتين هو الذي يخلق العالم الذي نراه “.
لذا يصبح سؤالنا كيف يبدو هذا من وجهة نظر شركائها فلسطين وإسرائيل وأمريكا؟
أمريكا تتأرجح مع جو بايدن على أعتاب إدراك واسع ومروع. بأننا لأكثر من سبعين عامًا كنا رعاة للاستبداد وإرهاب الدولة ، وأن المسؤولية عن سلسلة المشاكل اللامتناهية التي شكلت شعوب فلسطين نتقاسمها جميعًا ودولة إسرائيل بالوكالة. إنه يوازي حسابنا القومي مع إرث العبودية وعدم المساواة العرقية والظلم النظامي الذي استيقظ مع احتجاجات حياة السود مهمة ، مثل حسابنا مع البطريركية والإرهاب الجنسي في حركة #metoo ، ونتيجة للرأسمالية لانقراضنا في الصفقة الخضراء الجديدة والحركة البيئية العالمية بقيادة صاحبة الرؤية غريتا ثونبرج.
تغيير الصحوة والمد والجزر الذي لا تُحصى عواقبه الكاملة وإمكاناته لإعادة تخيل البشرية وتغييرها ، وتمثل حركات العدالة الاجتماعية السياسية والبيئية والمادية والجنسية والعرقية تحولًا حضاريًا كليًا وثورة في حقوق الإنسان العالمية والتي ستمثل يومًا ما تغيير وتجديد أفكارنا عن الإنسان والمعنى والقيمة.
كان فرانسيس فوكوياما مخطئًا عندما توقع أننا نعيش في نهاية التاريخ. نحن نعيش في بداية تاريخ جديد. لكنه كان محقًا تمامًا عندما شخَّص مبادئ عملها في كتابه “نهاية التاريخ والرجل الأخير”. “كانت رغبة العبد المستمرة في الاعتراف هي المحرك الذي دفع التاريخ إلى الأمام ، وليس التهاون العاطل والهوية الذاتية التي لا تتغير للسيد.”
آمل أن نكون في بدايات أن نصبح بشرًا. أخشى أن يتحول إرثنا التاريخي إلى أفخاخ وتزييف وروايات استيعابية واستعمارية قد تسرق فيها طغيان الهويات المرخصة أرواحنا. هذه هي مشكلة مرآة Hobgoblin المكسورة في Anderson’s The Snow Queen ؛ نحن ضائعون في عالم من الصور المشوهة والأصداء الملتقطة والأوهام. هذا أيضًا ، يجب أن نقاوم.
إسرائيل عالقة في فكي تاريخها ، أسيرة نظام نتنياهو للفاشية الفاسدة من الدم والإيمان والأرض ، ولكنها أيضًا ضحية أصبحت مرآة قاتمة لمن أساء معاملتها. لقد تعلمت إسرائيل الدروس الخاطئة من النازيين. الخوف والقوة والقوة ليست الأشياء الوحيدة التي لها معنى ، ولا نعيش في عالم يكون فيه الحب بدون قوة فدائية.
في حملته الواسعة للتطهير العرقي وقمع المعارضة ، وفي دبلوماسيته للإرهاب والمفاوضات بإطلاق الصواريخ ، يلعب نتنياهو مع ناخبيه من اليمين المتطرف كرئيس صوري لهم. لكنه ربما أخطأ في تقدير ردود الفعل الدولية. لقد تم استفزازه لفضح الطبيعة الحقيقية للاحتلال ، والقبعة البيضاء التي تمنحها روايات الإيذاء التاريخي آخذة في الانزلاق.
لقد أنجزت الانتفاضة الثالثة أهدافها المتمثلة في تغيير السرد ، وكسر الدعم الأمريكي للعسكرة الإسرائيلية ، وتعزيز الدعم للمقاطعة ، وسحب الاستثمارات ، والعقوبات ، ونقل قضية عمرها عقود إلى مركز الصدارة ، وتوقيتها للتصويت على صفقة الأسلحة الضخمة الآن في الكونجرس. على الأقل هذه كانت أهدافي في أعقاب دفاعنا عن شعب فلسطين في الأقصى.
آخرون من المدافعين عن فلسطين لديهم خططهم وأهدافهم ؛ بالتأكيد ظهرت حماس منتصراً واضحاً في النضال ، بعد أن استولت على السلطة من حكومة فتح في فلسطين من خلال الدفاع الفعال عن شعبها ، وجعل الانتخابات يرفض عباس وصفها بأنها غير ذات صلة. لقد قامت حماس بنزع الشرعية عن السلطة الفلسطينية ، ولطخت شراكتها مع الحكومة الإسرائيلية على أنها تعاون ، في حين أن الانتفاضة الثالثة ، التي تشنها حماس وكذلك العشرات من الفصائل الأخرى ، والقوات الخاصة من عدد من الحكومات الحليفة ، والمجانين مثلي ، قد دعت إلى يشكك في فكرة حل الدولتين.
أقول هذا عن حماس وجميع الثوار. إن من يقف بين الاستبداد وإرهاب الدولة من الغزو والاستعباد والموت وحياة الأبرياء هو أبطال وأبطال إنسانيتنا. التفاصيل ليست ذات صلة.
ألسنا حفظة أخينا؟
هناك طريق إلى الأمام يتجاوز النموذج الثنائي التفرع للهوية المزدوجة. التخلي عن حل الدولتين وإعادة تصور وتحويل إسرائيل وفلسطين كدولة موحدة في ظل القانون العلماني ومصممة لحماية المساواة وحقوق الإنسان العالمية.
توفر رعاية أمريكا المالية والعسكرية الهائلة لدولة إسرائيل رافعة كبيرة لتغيير ميزان القوى. أنا أؤيد حركة مقاطعة إسرائيل BDS عندما تعني السلام ونزع السلاح. يجب أن نمول أنفسنا ونشكل أنفسنا لغايات بناءة وليست هدَّامة ، وللحب بدلاً من الكراهية والأمل بدلاً من الخوف.
نبني الديمقراطية في إسرائيل ونبني العدل والمساواة لأقلياتها ، تمامًا كما في أمريكا. أعتقد أنه يجب تحرير شعب إسرائيل من نظام فاشي من الدم والإيمان والتراب ، لأن المستفيدين من إرهاب الدولة والطغيان يخضعون له أيضًا. هذا هو التناقض الداخلي الكبير للسلطة الاستبدادية مثل الفاشية. إنه نظام يجرد من الإنسانية ويستغل حتى أولئك الذين يرتكبون جرائمهم ضد الإنسانية باسمهم كاستراتيجية للترخيص وصنع الموافقة ، ولماذا يجب أن يستهلك نفسه حتما.
بينما تستعد إسرائيل لحلها النهائي لمشكلة فلسطين ، فإن أمريكا لا تفعل شيئًا. لا شيء لوقف الجرائم ضد الإنسانية ، وكل شيء لتزويد المجرمين بالسلاح وأنواع الدعم الأخرى. نحن نتحمل المسؤولية عن هذه الجرائم مع وكلائنا في إسرائيل.
ادعى الأشخاص الذين عاشوا بالقرب من معسكرات الموت النازية أنهم لا يعرفون شيئًا عن الهولوكوست ، ولا شيء عن المطر الغزير من الرماد البشري الذي غطى مدنهم وصبغهم بجرائمه الصامتة. لكننا نعلم. كيف نجيب ونحن نعلم ولم نفعل شيئا؟
Hebrew
20 במאי 2024 מקורות הרוע בפחד, כוח וכוח: שאלות קיומיות בצל רצח העם הישראלי של הפלסטינים, מכיוון שהעולם לא עושה דבר כדי להשתיק את גשם המוות
כשישראל מדברת אליי בחלומות כאילו קול ההיסטוריה היה קולו של בן אדם אחד, היא לא עונדת פנים של ניצול איקוני של השואה ומשחרר המין האנושי מהאיומים הקיומיים של עריצות וטרור ומהטבעת הווגנרית של פחד, כוח וכוח שהיו לו פעם, אבל של דמותו של מרטין צ’טווין בסדרת הקוסמים, קורבן להתעללות מפלצתית שבאמצעות תפיסת השלטון הפך בעצמו למפלצת.
יש לו קו שכמו חידת זן עוטפת ומאפיינת את מה שאצל עצמי היא השאלה העיקרית כיצד להפוך לאנושי בתנאי מאבק כפויים הדורשים שימוש בכוח בהתנגדות, כאשר השימוש בכוח חברתי הוא תמיד מעורפל, דה-הומניזציה, ומציית לחוק התנועה השלישי של ניוטון ככוחות תגובה דו-כיווניים שיוצרים אנטיתזה משלהם. “אתה יודע, כשהייתי ילד, אדם שנועד לטפל בי כופף אותי מעל השולחן שלו וקיבל אותי שוב ושוב בכל פעם הייתי לבד איתו. זה עוזר לי להבין אמת. אתה חזק או שאתה חלש.”
הנה השקר המקורי של העריץ והפשיסט באפולוגטיקה ובהצדקה העצמית של הכוח; השקר שרק לכוח יש משמעות, שאין טוב או רע. אופן השימוש בכוח הוא בעל חשיבות שווה למי שמחזיק בו. פחד וכוח הם אמצעי עיקרי להחלפה אנושית, אך לא האמצעי היחיד; אהבה, חברות ושייכות חשובים לא פחות. השאלה הגדולה שעליה מנסה הדמוקרטיה לענות היא כיצד ניתן לאזן בין הזכויות והצרכים של יחידים כך שאף אחד לא יפגע בזכויות של אחר.
זהו קו אשר לוכד בצורה מושלמת את הסתירות הטבועות בטבעת הוואגנרית של פחד, כוח וכוח כמקור הרוע; שכן השימוש בכוח חברתי הוא חתרני לערכיו שלו. עם זאת, התנאים המוטלים של מאבק מהפכני מצריכים לעתים קרובות אלימות, ועד שאלי החוק והסדר יופלו מכסאותיהם, אני חייב להסכים עם הכתבה המפורסמת של סארטר במחזהו “ידיים מלוכלכות” מ-1948, שצוטט על ידי פרנץ פאנון בנאומו מ-1960. למה אנחנו משתמשים באלימות, והפכו לאלמוות על ידי מלקולם אקס; “בכל דרך אפשרית.”
כפי שכתב וולטר רודני ב-The Groundings with my Brothers; “אמרו לנו שאלימות כשלעצמה היא רוע, ושתהא הסיבה אשר תהיה, היא לא מוצדקת מבחינה מוסרית. לפי איזה סטנדרט של מוסר יכולה האלימות שבה משתמש עבד כדי לשבור את שלשלאותיו להיחשב זהה לאלימות של אדון עבדים? לפי אילו אמות מידה נוכל להשוות את האלימות של שחורים שדוכאו, מדוכאים, מדוכאים ומדוכאים במשך ארבע מאות שנים עם אלימותם של פשיסטים לבנים. לא ניתן לשפוט אלימות שמטרתה החזרת כבוד האדם ושוויון לפי אותו קנה מידה כמו אלימות שמטרתה לשמור על אפליה ודיכוי”.
והנה הקטע שאליו הוא מתייחס מפי ליאון טרוצקי ב-Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice; “בעל עבדים שבאמצעות ערמומיות ואלימות כובל עבד בשלשלאות, ועבד שבאמצעות ערמומיות או אלימות שובר את השלשלאות – שלא יגידו לנו הסריסים הבזויים שהם שווים בפני בית דין של מוסר!”
אולם בהשתקפות אני חושב על אותן דמויות גדולות שהיו גם גיבורי שחרור וגם נבלי עריצות; נפוליאון, וושינגטון, סטאלין, מאו, הרשימה היא אוסף כמעט אינסופי של צרות וכישלונות ראייה שבהם עולמות חדשים אמיצים הפכו לגיהנום ולמדינות קרסראליות. לראיה אני מציע למדינות שהקימו; צרפת האימפריאלית, אמריקה, ברית המועצות, המפלגה הקומוניסטית הסינית, ומעל לכל מדינת ישראל, חלום מקלט שנרקם באימת השואה שקורבנותיו למדו את הלקחים הלא נכונים מהנאצים ונטלו על עצמם את תפקידם בכיבוש פלשתינה. דוד בן-גוריון היה לפי כל פרשנות סבירה המשיח, שכן הוא זכה בישראל כמקום מקלט ושייכות לאחר מאות שנים של גלות והעמיים היהודיים בכל העולם שנתבעו על ידי שום מדינה מאז נפילת אל-אנדלוס ב-1492; אבל זו הייתה נחמה קטנה לאלה שמתו מתחת לפסי הטנקים שלו. הסכנות של האידיאליזם הן אמיתיות מאוד; אבל כך גם הסכנות שבכניעה לסמכות ובשותפות השתיקה מול הרוע.
אני צייד של פשיסטים, ושלי הוא מוסר של צייד. מבחינתי יש מבחן פשוט לשימוש בכוח; מי מחזיק בכוח
במהלך השנים המאושרות הרבות שבהן לימדתי זיהוי פלילי בתיכון עמק סונומה, התחלתי כל שנה חדשה ביום הראשון לשיעור בהדגמה שקראתי לה להיות נקודת משען; הנחת חפץ על שולחני עם עולמות “זהו נקודת משען.” ואז להציב עצם מוארך על זה, “זה מאזן מנוף. כשההורים שלך שואלים אותך מה אתה לומד בשיעור זיהוי פלילי, אמור להם שאתה לומד להפוך לנקודת משען ולשנות את מאזן הכוחות בעולם”.
זה נשאר הצהרת משימה סבירה בחיים, ואני מעמיד את חיי באיזון עם כל אלה שפרנץ פאנון נא
med עלובי כדור הארץ; חסרי הכוח והמנושלים, המושתקים והמחוקים.
כל מי שצד מפלצות חייב לזכור תמיד את האזהרה של ניטשה במעבר לטוב ולרע; “מי שנלחם במפלצות צריך להיזהר שלא יהפוך בכך למפלצת. ואם אתה מביט ארוכות לתוך תהום, התהום תביט בך בחזרה.”
בסופו של דבר כל מה שחשוב הוא מה אנחנו עושים עם הפחד שלנו, ואיך
The question of whether an author’s historical claim to stand with Israel makes them a Zionist and a fascist was posed in an online forum, as Israel violates Biden’s Red Line and begins the assault on the refugees of Rafah, reverse face of the question of whether protest against the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians constitutes antisemitism and hate speech. Among the first objections to these questions was that an author’s ideology has nothing to do with their work rather than emerging from it, of which we in the group are all members of a fandom.
Here is my reply:
Actually a very relevant and complex question. Why must one peoples Return mean anothers Exile? Why must we be each other’s jailors, and not each other’s liberators?
Netanyahu and his settler regime and apologists would like everyone, especially their own citizens, to conflate being Israeli with being Jewish, and to use fear to centralize power to a carceral state of force and control and legitimize their authority as necessary to security. But none those things are true, and security is an illusion.
The idea of Israel as an empire of tyranny and terror is antithetical to an Israel founded to protect Jewish peoples from tyranny and terror. The Netanyahu regime and the Occupation which long precedes it are subversions of Zion as a refuge for the powerless, the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, and also a dark mirror of Judaism as the work of Tikkun Olam, repair of the world.
Marx began Das Capital with an eschatological vision of the New Jerusalem and the limitless possibilities of a humankind free from the profit motive as an analogy of Original Sin, and free from its praxis as the reduction of human relations to cash exchange. There are far more such possible futures of becoming human together through love rather than fear, more than we can now imagine.
Friends, everything the enemy says is a lie; never let them define the terms of debate or the rules of the game.
Fascisms of blood, faith, and soil now rule most of our world, and to this I say Never Again! Regardless of whose name those who wish to enslave us claim to act as a strategy of our subjugation and dehumanization.
No matter where you begin with divisions and hierarchies of being human, of elite belonging and exclusionary otherness, you always end up at the gates of Auschwitz.
As I wrote in my post of December 11 2023, What is Hate Speech? What is Anti-Semitism? Who Decides What Is Permitted, and How Shall We Enforce Limits On Each Other’s Freedoms? Case of the Repression of Dissent By Universities Beholden to Special Interest Money; Free speech ends where hate and violence begin; and dehumanization is criminal incitement to violence.
Yes, but what is hate speech? What is Anti-Semitism? Who decides what is permitted, and how shall we enforce limits on each other’s freedoms?
Such questions about our fundamental rules of how to be human together are now being fought out on university campuses throughout our nation and the world, which pit student mass protests against the Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians in Gaza against repression of dissent by authority both within education systems and between institutions of education and those of the state, and often shaped by the special interest money which has been allowed to define the terms of the debate.
In large part the world has accepted the state of Israel’s claim that criticism of its use of force inclusive of vast war crimes in Gaza is anti-semitism. There are two problems with this; first, Palestinians and Israelis are both semites, one people divided by history as faith, ethnicity, and national identity weaponized in service to power. Second, this falsification is deployed globally by the state of Israel to both defend and subjugate the Jewish diaspora by enforcing identification of being Jewish with the state of Israel, which also deflects questioning of its brutal colonial-Apartheid settler regime.
We must beware those who claim to speak and act in our name, and most especially commit unforgiveable acts to make us complicit in their crimes, for this is a strategy of fascist tyranny.
Netanyahu’s settler regime, founded on conquest and theft of indigenous people’s lands as manifest destiny authorized by God in imitation of our own Conquest of the Native Americans, the state of Israel institutionalized as a military society designed as a refuge for and avenger of Jews, and the whole Zionist ideology of identitarian politics and a nation of one faith and one blood, remains today the world’s most extreme and dangerous fascist successor state to the Nazis.
But this need not remain so. Israel would very much like to convince her own citizens and all of us that to be a Jew is to be a member and figure of the state of Israel, and that to call out and oppose the state of Israel for crimes against humanity and war crimes in Gaza is to be guilty of hate crime against Jewish people, but this is a lie, and one of many.
So we come to this final question; how do we oppose state tyranny and terror without confusing and conflating a state with the people it claims to speak and act for? How answer division with solidarity?
Netanyahu has incited anti Jewish hate as well as anti Israeli horror at his atrocities and war crimes. When a state demonizes itself before the world, it is the diasporic population of those it claims to act in service of as legitimation of power who suffer first. This is a primary strategy of fascism; making those in whose name it claims to act complicit in unforgiveable crimes. But the use of force obeys Newtons Third Law of Motion and creates its own counterforce and resistance. The crimes of Israel have reawakened a slumbering monster and put every Jewish person and community at risk. We must now bring regime change, peace, and democracy to Israel or witness the return of the global Fourth Reich and its policies of Judenfrei. Save the Jews; bring down the Israeli state.
Herein we may find guidance in Jean Genet’s restatement of Nietzsche’s principle of how those who hunt monsters become monsters themselves in the use of violence to enforce authorized identities and ideas of virtue; “If we behave like those on the other side, then we are the other side. Instead of changing the world, all we’ll achieve is a reflection of the one we want to destroy.”
Yesterday we witnessed a ray of light pierce the immense darkness of our moment, in twin events of fracture on both of the primary fronts of the Gaza War; in the Israeli regime of tyranny and terror and in America’s complicity in the atrocities and crimes against humanity of our colony and proxy state. On the Israeli front, Benny Gantz threatens to leave the coalition government which would bring it down unless Netanyahu stops the genocide, and on the American front Biden for the first time in the history of the American-Israel partnership aligns us with the principle of our universal human rights inclusive of Palestinians as fellow human beings in an empathetic speech which defines goals of peace and equality in the region and reveals that he is working on solutions rather than obstructing them and abetting the atrocities of Israel, something I wish he would have communicated with us all on October 7.
To clarify, Biden personally, our government, and our nation will forever bear a measure of responsibility for how the immense arsenal we provided Israel has been used, regardless of what may happen next. For these crimes against humanity both Netanyahu and Biden among many others belong in the same court as Milosevic. Nothing in this must divert our gaze from the future and the possibilities for change which Biden and Gantz have now offered us. In both Israel and America, we now have agents of change speaking not merely of ceasefire, but also of our future and solutions which might allow us to emerge from the legacies of our history.
America and Israel have been partners in a Faustian bargain; in its wake we believed the Holocaust proved that only power is real and has meaning, embraced the seduction of power to be the arbiter of virtue, and with the centralization of power to authority forged carceral states of force and control and of imperial conquest and dominion.
But now the tide begins to turn.
As Biden said in his historic Morehouse College speech; “It’s a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. That’s why I’ve called for an immediate ceasefire to stop the fighting, bring the hostages home, and I’ve been working on a deal as we speak.”
“This is one of the hardest, most complicated problems in the world. There’s nothing easy about it. I know it angers and frustrates many of you, including my family, but most of all, I know it breaks your heart. It breaks mine as well.”
Tyranny blinks, and we must seize the moment. As Edwin Markham wrote in Preparedness;
“For all your days prepare,
And meet them ever alike:
When you are the anvil, bear—
When you are the hammer, strike. “
In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power; let us use ours not to dehumanize and enslave others, but to restore our humanity and to liberate each other. As the lyrics of the beautiful elegiac song in the series Wednesday goes, nothing else matters.