May 21 2025 In Memoriam, Joe Biden

     Let us remember Joe Biden, who now lingers on death’s door, sadly of the cancer he so long championed finding a cure for so as to free others from their suffering, in some ways symbolic of his life of service and its meaning for America as the neoliberal order he represents begins to fail, terminal stage capitalism tries to free itself from its host political system, and democracy falls.

     In the end he was able to save neither America nor himself from the mechanical failures of our internal contradictions and from capture by systems of oppression, but he tried with great courage and relentless bulldogedness to do so, if with flawed vision, ambiguous motives, and confused strategies like the rest of us.

     History will misconstrue him as The Last Good American or our first tyrant blind to his own complicity in the subversion of democracy and the abandonment of our universal human rights, but the processes of his canonization and demonization will begin only with his death, so I have chosen this moment to interrogate his meaning for us all. I believe it is of vital, crucial, importance for our future and the idea of America that we remember him as neither hero nor villain, but as one of us.

     His career of five decades of service to our nation reaching its crest as our President and champion in the Restoration of Democracy as he held back the tide of fascist tyranny and terror for long years during our time of greatest peril.

      Yet I cannot call him a good man, but like myself a bad man who was on our side as he saw it, though our ideas of America did not always align. I fought against his nomination as our candidate in 2020 by the Democratic Party of which I am a precinct captain, with everything at my disposal short of force as we needed a champion who could defeat Trump, and again in 2024 because if you support genocide I can not vote for you, and I must fight you.

      And there is so much more to this story. Because he wouldn’t get his lilly white hands dirty fighting for our liberty and our humanity in Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Palestine, I did.  

     Its not how I would have chosen to live in my sixties,  but its where I was needed.

     He did try to kill me in a drone bombing of our positions in Yemen to enforce the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid we were counter blockading, the second president to try to kill me after then-Governor Reagan but the only one I voted for.

      Also chief silencer of womens voices in the Anita Hill trial, which delayed the #metoo moment for a generation and bequeathed us Clarence Thomas as a Supreme Court Justice and arbiter of public virtue.

      And Biden was a major Bush partner in invading Iraq and subverting our liberty in the Patriot Act which placed us under de facto military law and began the counterinsurgency model of policing.

     Plus he began politics exactly like George Wallace leading antibussing white supremacists versus Bernie Sanders and the Freedom Riders.

       So yes, Biden was useful in countering Trump briefly to buy us time to organize Resistance, but he was no white hat nor even on our side, if by our side you mean AOC’s Green New Deal and Bernie’s universal free healthcare. In fact Biden’s Presidency was a firewall of conservative forces and the Collaborationist wing of the Democratic Party against Progressives, and this is what sabotaged the Restoration of America.

     Yet he was a man for all that, as the song written by Robert Burns in 1795 goes, neither good nor evil and in our broken world capable of acts which were both at once, relative to one’s angle of view.

“Is there, for honest poverty,

That hangs his head, and a’ that?

The coward slave, we pass him by,

We dare be poor for a’ that!

For a’ that, and a’ that,

Our toils obscure and a’ that,

The rank is but the guinea’s stamp,

The man’s the gowd for a’ that.

What though on hamely fare we dine,

Wear hoddin grey, and a’ that;

Gie fools their silks, and knaves their wine,

A man’s a man for a’ that:

For a’ that, and a’ that,

Their tinsel shew, and a’ that,

The honest man, tho’ e’er sae poor,

Is king o’ men for a’ that.

Ye see yon birkie,[a] ca’d a lord,

Wha struts and stares and a’ that;

Tho’ hundreds worship at his word,

He’s but a coof[b] for a’ that:

For a’ that, and a’ that,

His ribband, star, and a’ that,

The man o’ independent mind,

He looks and laughs at a’ that.

A prince can make a belted knight,

A marquis, duke, and a’ that;

But an honest man’s aboon his might,[c]

Gude faith, he maunna fa’ that![d]

For a’ that, and a’ that,

Their dignities and a’ that;

The pith o’ sense, and pride o’ worth,

Are higher rank than a’ that.

Then let us pray that come it may,

As come it will, for a’ that,

That sense and worth, o’er a’ the earth,

May bear the gree,[e] and a’ that!

For a’ that, and a’ that,

It’s coming yet for a’ that,

That man to man, the warld o’er,

Shall brothers be for a’ that.

     As I wrote in my post of July 8 2024, A Tale of Two Bidens and Two Americas: Light and Darkness In A Titanic Struggle to Become Human Together; Of our truths, histories, memories, and identities, which we drag around behind us like an invisible reptilian tail; there are those which must be kept and those from which we must escape, and if we are very lucky, they are not always the same.

     Herein I interrogate the discontiguous boundaries and interfaces between realms of being represented by the two figural images of Biden which are now part of our historical memory and seared into our national identity like a living brand, a Janus-like chiaroscuro of darkness and light like America herself; one a ghost of his former glory as victorious liberty, an echo of sympatico, compassion, and embodied solidarity in revolutionary struggle who gathers into his protection the Wretched of the Earth and all her huddled masses yearning to be free, but now an illusion robbed of its substance, like humankind consumed by the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

      Limned against this fallen greatness lies the chasms of darkness of an empire of conquest and dominion and a carceral state of force and control written in the blood of those whose lives we have fed into the machine of our wealth, power, and privilege, including the Native Americans whose nations we have assimilated as our own, the African slaves who created our wealth and power at our origins, and the colonized peoples whose labor and resources confer our dominion of the world principally through control of oil as a strategic resource.

      This is a map of the world and the limits of the human embodied in the figure of Genocide Joe who has made us all complicit in the Israeli ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians, crimes against humanity by our colony and proxy state Israel whose design and purpose is to divide the indigenous peoples of the region against themselves and secure our control of oil without which our civilization goes dark, resulting in the conflict now ongoing between the Arab-American Alliance and the Dominion of Iran which has become a theatre of World War Three as Iran’s ally Russia and America fight to the death through our proxies.

     In Joe Biden we are confronted by an image of America and of ourselves, in all our grandeur and terror. He is become a symbol of our historical duality as conservative and revolutionary forces bound together in one flesh and nation in titanic struggle to become human.

     First, the embrace of our darkness as we struggle to become human. Here we find the first Biden-Trump debate an echo and reflection of Biden’s appalling performances against his Democratic rivals during the selection trials and debates of 2019.

     As I wrote in my post of October 15 2019, America redefines itself: the Democratic Presidential debates round ad nauseum; As Biden goggles in stupefaction, coughing up platitudes and party boilerplate like hairballs, a guttering fire which dimly echoes the scripted glibness of his glory days as a diversionary talking head and apparatchik of hegemonic elites and the carceral state, the Warren-Sanders détente holds while the outliers swarm and hurl barbs at pack leader Elizabeth Warren.

     I’d love to have the Progressive alliance of the Elizabeth Warren-Bernie Sanders team as President and Vice President in either configuration of roles; and my wish for this election is for them to run together. The balance of Warren the conservative policy wonk and Beltway insider committed to salvaging capitalism from its death spiral of privatization and Sanders the Democratic Socialist and ideologue committed to revolution and social transformation achieves an ideal state of dynamically unstable forces able to adapt to changing conditions with agility and harness chaos as an engine of growth and life and as a lever of change.

     All living systems must have both a revolutionary and innovating force of adaptation through which to evolve and meet the challenge of new threats to our survival, and a conserving force which insulates meaning from change and ensures the survival of our values and principles such as those embodied in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, and of those traditions and anchorages which have allowed us to survive thus far. In both natural and cultural evolution, we need both forces working cooperatively to manage change and shape our future.

     The function of conservatism is to buffer order from the shock of the new and withstand stresses and changing conditions without losing ourselves or undergoing morphogenic change, the loss of identity as structural form, or ruptures to our prochronism, the memory and history of our choices, successful adaptations and strategies of survival as expressed in our ideational form, the loss of our culture and traditions.

     The function of revolution and innovation is to capitalize on chaos as adaptive potential and to transform, create, and discover new forms, meanings, and values.

      For the origins of my idea of life as a game played by representatives of these shaping forces, I refer you to Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy, Yasunari Kawabata’s The Master of Go, and Herman Hesse’s The Glass Bead Game.

     To return to the immediate subject of the debates, a brief summary:

     Joe Biden would have been a good news anchor, if someone else was writing his copy. I think he should run for President against Trump- but as a Republican.

     Biden’s handlers advise him to run on his record. I think he should too; the invasion of Iraq, the Anita Hill hearings, his opposition to desegregation. Whoever’s interests he represents, I do not believe that they are ours.

     Kamala Harris has changed the course of history in calling Biden out on his antibusing past, in which his hidden face as George Wallace is exposed, and we owe her a great debt. I hope this is the last we shall ever hear of Joe Biden; but I fear that systems of oppression and hegemonies of elite wealth, power, and privilege have already anointed him their figurehead as the President least likely to bring real and meaningful change or seizures of power by the people.  

     Harris is something quite different, and has spoken truth to power on behalf of us all, as she did when she defied the entire Democratic Party in California to outlaw capital punishment. She has established her role as a champion of the people unafraid to defy authority when it is wrong, and I hope she will continue to do so in whatever office she may hold. I am wondering now what form of co-optation they will offer her to silence her voice; perhaps the Vice Presidency as Biden’s performative minder?

     Beto O’Rourke has also championed the powerless, and has a lot of good things to say; I agree with his plan to tax churches which refuse to support gay marriage out of existence. Further, I hope we may one day tax all church properties and organizations of faith as authorized identities out of existence, for a state funded faith is inimical to democracy, and this is exactly what we have now with tax free church businesses and properties. He is a committed crusader against gun violence and racism. He’s also learning fast, and is another figure I expect to see in the future national political arena. Beto, we don’t need to confiscate people’s guns, just make the manufacture or sale of guns and ammunition a federal crime equal to murder and possession of a gun legal proof of intent to kill.

        Pete Buttigieg has great value as a figure of liberty, being a gay combat veteran with an Arabic name. We need more diversity in our representatives. In his own field of expertise he is unsurpassed among the candidates; in his lockup with Tulsi Gabbard over Syria he was absolutely right. He should be Bernie’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or National Security Advisor; just don’t loose him on any problem that can’t be fixed by breaking it with greater force.

     Amy Klobuchar threw groundless accusations at Elizabeth Warren, enacting Margaret Atwood’s analysis of seizures of power from the patriarchy resulting in female on female violence in a zero sum game for power rather than mutual support. I found this ugliness disturbing, enough to overcome the seductive effect of her voice as every time she speaks I see Mrs Maisel from the Prime Video series, and like Circe’s swine am bereft of all reason.

     Also the fish-eyed glassy stare of bewilderment as Castro discussed monopolies was that of someone who just isn’t smart enough to follow a high level conversation.

     Andrew Yang seems like a nice fellow with a single-issue candidacy, who is utterly clueless about human nature. His breathtaking vision to obsolesce labor in a universal socialist state where our machines do the hard and dirty work to free us to be Plato’s Philosopher-Kings and to dream, create, and invent is Utopian in the extreme, in the negative sense of the word as used by its Marxist critics. This kind of Techno-Anarchism has two problems; first, the technology to obsolesce labor does not yet exist and our sentient artificial intelligences which are the successor species to humankind will first replace human imagination and creativity and enslave us, second that this has been tried before as the New Soviet Man, who free from the profit motive should be without violence or unequal power relations, and we have seen how well that worked out. Give a hundred people a basic living stipend of one thousand dollars a month with no strings attached and 97 of them will refuse to work unless they are bribed, as was endemic and pervasive in the Soviet Union, and was also a contributing cause in the Fall of the Roman Empire. Many will simply go on a bender til the cash runs out. Of the other three, one will take that money out of circulation by ratholing it in savings or buried in the backyard due to the epigenetic trauma of poverty, one will spend it on shiny baubels, and one will squander it on unrealistic ventures and dreams they have no education or background to achieve. The achievement of that education must be primary, and I believe absolutely in universal lifelong free university education. The question is, how to free humankind without condemning us to our most self destructive impulses? Like the abandonment of social force and violence as police and armies, this requires rules about how freedom is used until we have grown beyond its need. Tie the Basic Living Stipend to a target behavior that will pay America forward, like meeting grade targets while enrolled at university or a trade apprenticeship program in critical fields, and we have a winnable plan; while avoiding the horrors of the workhouse and the labor camp. Work never was freedom. Keep trying, Andrew; you’ve got time to learn. I find your vision of an ideal society compelling, but forty years of revolutionary struggle have taught me that we are not yet ready for it.

     Would it surprise anyone to learn I’m still voting for Bernie Sanders?

     And for the Second Act of this play, witness now our light as we emerge from the shadows of our history. Herein we find echo and reflection of the 2020 First Presidential Biden-Trump Debate in Biden’s magnificent Madison Address to the Nation.

     As I wrote in my post of September 30 2020, Against the Monster Himself, Biden Becomes Magnificent: the First Presidential Debate; Biden tricked Trump into revealing his operational command and control of the Proud Boys and other forces of white supremacist terror and fascist aligned militias. And Trump never even noticed how he had been outwitted into a public confession of criminal complicity in racist violence and the disruption of Black Lives Matter protests for equality and justice by what has previously been deniable forces of repression acting in coordination with white supremacist infiltration agents within the police.

     Agile as a fox Biden was tonight, and he danced rings around the Clown of Terror. Trump spun nets of lies with which to snare the hearts of men, and Biden smote them asunder like Alexander cutting the Gordian Knot. Trump spat venom and Biden deflected and evaded and stopped his mouth of hate and fear with truths, counterattacking into the line of argumentation like a matador whose glittering rapier weaves through the horns of a raging beast’s charge.

     Trump knows but one game, rugby, and brought to this arena his arts of intimidation and the crush and maul of direct charge; but Biden is a master of the old Spanish swordsmanship of La Verdadera Destreza; timing, precision, evasion, encirclement and movement, angle of attack and absention of target, and the envelopment of opposition in counterattack, and tonight the brilliance of his skills was on full display against the rage and arrogance of Trump.

     Tonight Biden demonstrated his mastery of Trump as a matador masters a brute of monstrous power but limited understanding, thinking several steps ahead of Trump in multiple dimensions of possibilities like a chessmaster and marshalling layers of Jesuitical rhetoric along them all.

     This was a contest of vacuity and bluster against depth and guile, and of amoral greed and vanity against greatness of soul and compassion for others, and this the first Presidential debate of 2020 was a victory for Biden and America, for tonight we have begun to reclaim our heart.

       Here follows a history of the 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Debates.

     December 20 2019 the years final Democratic Presidential Campaign debate & a recap of those previous

     Bernie Sanders as always spoke with passion and vision and articulated clear plans and objectives in the restoration of America to her former glory. He is the only figure in politics today who operates from a coherent ideology which organizes all his policies, like Plato’s ideal of a philosopher-king.

      Elizabeth Warren, the genius of capitalism and chessmaster of the Beltway, was as always twelve moves ahead of her opponents and has read a dozen great books on any topic of policy you might name. Anyone who enters her arena ends up looking like Salieri to her Mozart. 

      Pete Buttigieg has during the course of this campaign been revealed as yet another wolf in Grandmother’s clothing, waiting to pounce when we are lulled off guard. I so wanted him to be as he represents himself, and not a carnival huckster and master of the bait and switch, sleight of hand, shell game, and the images of funhouse mirrors. He combines so many iconic dreams in his illusory presentation of self, all wrapped up with a pretty bow, yet every time he claims to agree with our goals and ideals he then proposes his own plan which will in fact sabotage all progress. There’s even video of him advocating for coal mining, a policy which for me places him beyond the boundary of ourselves and into the realm of otherness. Sadly, I must name Jiggy a conservative agent of infiltration and subversion. Perhaps his military background renders him unable to think outside of authoritarian structures and hierarchies; that’s the charitable version of why he has sought to deceive us.

     He could also be exactly as I see him, now that I realize why he seemed so familiar; for I saw him many times in the great play Angels in America, in his true form as Roy Cohn, former lawyer of Donald Trump. Watch Tony Kushner’s play if you need to confirm it for yourself; it’s the greatest work of twentieth century American theatre, so I can guarantee its worth your time. 

     Tom Steyer’s concluding sermon was magnificent; “Donald Trump is not against immigration from white people. He is against immigration from non-white people. That’s a racist argument from a racist President and it has led him to break the laws of humanity.”

      Amy Klobuchar kept her claws in this time and was funny, brilliant, fearless, and empathetic; every time she spoke I saw her as Mrs. Mazel. Seriously. In terms of performance of identity, tonight was a victory, perhaps one transformational to her political future.

     Andrew Yang launched a brilliant attack on the political consequences of economic inequality, “You know what you need to donate to political campaigns? Disposable income.” Recasting his looney Basic Living Stipend as reparations was a stroke of genius.

     Joe Biden just makes me want to puke.

     And now, a recap of my posts on the debates:

May 10 2019 Biden presided over America’s lost chance to defend women from sexual violence, harassment, and inequality at work and under the law

      Anita Hill calls out Joe Biden in The New York TImes; Biden presided over the Clarence Thomas hearings and America’s lost chance to defend women from sexual violence, harassment, and inequality at work and under the law.

     If Biden had used his opportunity differently, we could have launched our epochal #metoo reckoning and wave of social change nearly three decades earlier.

     Biden’s defense of the patriarchy is an unforgivable breach of public trust, but only the most visible reason he is unfit for public office. There is also the disturbing and outrageous story of his actions before he became a national political figure, marshalling white supremacists against school bussing and desegregation, exactly opposite the Freedom Riders and Bernie Sanders. Of the two, I know who represents me and who I prefer.

     We are presented with the spectacle of a misogynist and racist as a major Democratic Party presidential candidate; Biden is the poster boy for everything that is wrong with the leadership and collaborationist wing of the Democrats, who under their masks are little different from their Republican partners.

    I don’t want a choice of reactionary clowns for President. I think we deserve better.

    The vast political and financial machine of the Democratic Party is trying to anoint Biden as its chosen contender in the coming fight with Trump for the soul of America and the destiny of the world. This is nothing less than a campaign of repression against Progressive Democrats, which includes the stunning betrayal of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ Green New Deal and the sidelining of Bernie Sanders’ Medicare For All.

     We Progressives will be resisting and organizing for revolutionary transformation of our Party, that it may become reflective of its constituency and its principles. At the same time we are being pressured to unite against Trump and support whomever wins the Democratic primary and nomination, and we have a choice of policy to make which will greatly influence our future possibilities and set of choices.

     I counsel restraint in limiting ones’ options, caution against taking pre-emptive positions, making non-negotiable demands, unilateral decisions without communicating with ones’ partners, or taking actions which sabotage trust or compromise our principles and values.

    As much as I’d love to say we must defeat Trump and fascism by any means necessary, I cannot. Our first duty is to remain true to ourselves and each other; this is also the first principle of Resistance.

    Therefore I refuse to sign the Indivisibles 2020 Campaign Pledge to vote for whomever runs for President in the next election as a Democrat. We must define ourselves positively, by what we are for, as well as negatively, by what we are against.

     Whoever best represents my values and principles will merit my vote and support, and must at minimum be personally free of misogyny and racism. Thus far, I’m campaigning and voting for Bernie.

     And so I have my own campaign pledge, which I ask all of you to take with me:

     My America is a free society of equals, and I stand for the absolute legal and structural equality of all human beings.

     I will make no compromise with evil.

May 16 2019 the Democratic Party’s blacklist to repress dissent

    Yet again the leadership of the Democratic Party has taken steps to crush dissent within its ranks and marginalize the progressives and socialists who are challenging old ways with new ideas.

     For those of you who have trouble telling the American political parties apart, the Democrats are ostensibly the liberal partners and opposition of the ruling Republican conservatives.

     Let’s test that proposition, shall we? We have the betrayal of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ Green New Deal and the sidelining of Bernie Sanders’ Medicare For All, the timid waffling and deflection on calling for impeachment of the President, the support and pressure of others to support the campaign of racist and misogynist Joe Biden for President, and now this- a blacklist.

     Echoing the malign and nefarious Hollywood Blacklist and the political show trials of the McCarthy era, this damning piece of villainy has no place in a democratic society and for me proves a final argument that we must radically transform the Democratic Party as an equal goal of our revolution with thwarting and overthrowing the Republicans.

June 21 2019 Biden is Unfit to Represent America

    Racist, misogynist, dismissive of climate change and reluctant public supporter of womens reproductive rights; Biden is unfit to represent America and is a de facto Republican infiltration agent in the Democratic Party.

     With a successful career built on a persona which excuses and contextualizes his horrible actions as jokes, his glib manipulation is obvious to me as the telltale sign of a psychopath.

    What then disambiguates Biden from Trump? Only the facts that he is not a known foreign agent and traitor to the United States, and has no known history as a sex predator personally, though his record as an enabler during the Anita Hill hearings is indisputable.

    I don’t think that’s enough of a difference to vote for him for President, do you?

June 29 2019 The Presidential Debates Are Now a Referendum on the Democratic Party

       Kamala Harris became a celebrity Thursday night for calling out Biden and Trump on their record and for speaking with passion and vision; beyond modeling the target behavior of challenging authority which is the true calling of anyone who does not identify as conservative, she changed the fundamental nature of the debate.

      The presidential debates are now a referendum on the Democratic Party; what shall our values and direction for the future be?

     In what is now a clear contest between competing visions of the meaning and purpose of the Democratic Party, Kamala Harris acted as the picador of the Democratic Socialists and other Progressives, those who embrace egalitarian transformation of our society, sinking barbs into the Collaborationist wing of the party and their counterparts the Republicans.

     That the Beltway-centric political machine of the Democratic Party has sheltered a racist-misogynist agent of subversion and infiltration whose sympathies and true allegiance are with the Fascist-Gideonite alliance of the Republican Party which has conspired to overthrow global democracy with the aid of a foreign power in treasonous conspiracy sickens and disgusts me.

     But the depravity and unAmerican nature of the Republicans and their Collaborationist Democrat puppets and subsidiaries are not my subject today; today I wish to explore future possibilities and the ideals, values, and principles of an America which has reclaimed its heart.

     We face two great challenges today which will drive our range of choices for all our tomorrows; the extinction of humankind and the viability of Earth as an ark of life, and the fall of democracy and civilization.

      Democracy as a category subsumes most of the other great issues of our time; the four ideals of freedom, equality, truth, and justice, but also the causes of equality in the aspects of race, gender and sexual personae, religion, and other issues of diversity and inclusion, immigration which includes all of these intersectionally, the transition to a borderless state with virtual citizenship for all who so declare, universal safeguard of human rights and democracy everywhere on earth, freedom of the press and freedom from surveillance, education which is critical to citizenship and democracy, reform of our justice system and the goals of a noncoercive society in which there are no prisons and no police, reform of our security services with the goal of racial justice and equality including disarming and demilitarizing the police and the abolition of Homeland Security  and its subsidiaries ICE and the Border Patrol, universal healthcare and the decommodification of the medical industry, worker co ownership and the evolution to a postcapitalist society.

     We deserve a world free of need and free of fear, in which we all share our common resources and benefit from co ownership of our government in a free society of equals.

     There is much to be done; let us begin the rebirth and moral regeneration of our civilization.

July 24 2019 Joe Biden, Architect of Imperial Conquest In the Iraq Invasion and Of State Terror In the Patriot Act

       Hey America, if you’d like a version of Trump as our next President who’ll move the evils from the shop window to the back room just like the good old days, and think it would be grand fun and maybe profitable to start a war with Iran or just about anybody, Joe Biden is your guy.

     With a history as a segregationist, disbeliever in women’s claims of sexual victimization as the chief derailment officer in the Anita Hill hearings, whose reluctance in support of women’s reproductive rights makes his true position clear, Biden will keep all those different people out of the swimming pool.

     As a principal architect of the Iraq Invasion, we can count on him to feed our young hooligans into the war machine and convert them into profit, especially when there’s oil to be stolen.

     All joking aside, one of my nephews returned from service in Iraq as an oxycontin addict, originally prescribed in a military hospital, thinking he’s Jesus and wandering around the city giving sermons to pigeons. Every politician who voted for war is directly responsible for the terrible costs borne by countless veterans, sometimes as in World War Two for the survival and freedom of us all, sometimes merely for the profit of others.

     When our government is an edifice of lies, illusions, and swindles operated for the benefit of plutocrats, who can sort wars of survival from those of greed?

July 31 2019 the Democratic Presidential Debates

     Surprises in this last round of Democratic Presidential debates; at least

for those who were hoping the two leading Progressives would eliminate each other in a destructive fight.

     Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders teamed up to deliver a decisive rebuke to the collaborationist wing of the Democratic Party; I would dearly love to see them as President and Vice President lead us in reawakening America’s values.

     Especially fun was watching Biden, patriarch and racist warmonger that he is, flop about and gobble witlessly in fish-eyed stupefaction, caught flat footed and outshone by everybody, as if waiting for his party handlers to arrive and tell him what he stands for.

      He reminds me of a Dickens character named the Yob or Young Nob, a thief of cloak closet valuables who crashes posh parties and specializes in looking like he is lost and waiting for his butler to arrive and bring him to the party he is supposed to be at somewhere else, whose vacuity and greyness of forgettable personality are his great assets in this duplicity; not very promising when applied to politics, though.

      Tonight vision and passion triumphed over vacuity and image; I hope that this signifies the direction of the future of Democracy and of the Democratic Party.

September 14 2019 On the Third Democratic Presidential Debate

     Triumph of the Faceless Men; the candidates of the Third Democratic Presidential debate were led onstage with bags over their heads, shuffling in servile abjection after the power brokers of the Democratic National Committee, hellbent on foisting upon us a dissent-free monochrome and male campaign unable to challenge the power asymmetries which are driving our society to destruction, or interrupt the flow of bribes from the plutocrats who are breaking our economy and annihilating our future as a nation and a species, have whipped the candidates into line, who with glassy eyes and brute inarticulate sheeplike bleeting and grunts jumped through the hoops set out for them, avoiding unauthorized topics and playing their assigned roles, then except for Bernie Sanders sitting up to beg for their treats of blacklist restricted funding.

     Who spoke for the survival of the earth and of humanity, for the rights of self-ownership and the bodily autonomy of women, for the victims of the legacy of slavery and the genocidal campaign of racist state terror and crimes against humanity in the concentration camps at our border?

     Only Beto O’Rourke directly challenged the gun lobby, at a time when gun violence is our most immediate threat and inseparable from police and other white supremacist terror, and it is no longer safe to send our children to school or leave our homes to go shopping.

     I praise the candidates for returning civility to public discourse, for their display of unity on shared core values and principles; but America is fighting for its survival, beset by existential threats to democracy and to our lives, and we need leadership who will take the fight to the enemy and win back our liberty and our future.

     If the current factors of climate change and the extinction of living systems remain unaltered, we may have only three more elections before we are all dead.

     We may have less than that before we lose the vote, if we permit tyranny to go unchallenged, and look then to see policies of white supremacy make those of the Confederacy and the Nazis seem moderate, and inequalities of gender which return us to the Dark Ages of misogynist patriarchy.

    So no, there were no winners in this circus, and the American people were the real losers. This was a day of the Hollow Ones, who have been eaten by the political machine which has betrayed us yet again.

     May we all one day regain our fire and our defiance.

      And what did he do with his mandate for the Restoration of America during his Presidency? Here follows one of the major turning points in a Presidency that will be remembered for the abandonment of our universal human rights in Palestine and of Afghanistan, failure to confront Russia in the invasion of Ukraine, and failure to defend our democracy by purging Trump and his Insurrectionists from among us in exile and loss of citizenship.

February 4 2022 A Stain of Cruelty: the Assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi

   To paraphrase the line from Hamlet and Star Trek in season one, episode 13, The Conscience of the King; There’s a stain of cruelty on your armor, President Biden.

    We have answered terror and death with terror and death, and this is both tragic and shameful. Force cannot answer force, nor heal the flaws of our humanity.

    As written for CNN by Barbara Starr, Oren Liebermann, Jeremy Herb and Eyad Kourdi; “It was the biggest US raid in the country since the 2019 operation that killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

     Biden spoke from the White House Thursday morning to announce that the operation had taken “a major terrorist leader off the battlefield.”

     “Thanks to the bravery of our troops, this horrible terrorist leader is no more,” Biden said from the Roosevelt Room. “Knowing that terrorist had chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a Special Forces raid at a much a greater risk to our own people rather than targeting him with an airstrike.”

    Now and then Biden reminds us all that he was among the principal collaborators in Bush’s invasion of Iraq as imperial conquest and colonial plunder to seize the strategic resource of oil by which America maintains a global hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege, an addiction which will result in the extinction of humankind as a species, and in the authorization through the Patriot Act of a carceral state of brutal force and pervasive surveillance and thought control exceeded only by Xin Jinping’s holocaust of the Uighurs of Xinjiang, which has enabled the most massive theft of our freedoms in our history, including the McCarthy era, and the most bizarre and reprehensible regime of torture, most infamous in the crimes against humanity perpetrated at Guantanamo and other secret prisons for political enemies of the regime and its oligarchic, plutocratic, and corporate robber baron paymasters, including even the grisly hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials.

    Once again our heroes and champions are proven to have feet of clay, and I mourn the failure of moral vision and addiction to power and the use of force and violence of President Biden, our government, and America as a guarantor of universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

    On this day and all too often, the Promethean Fire of the Torch of Liberty which illuminates the gates of our nation in New York Harbor did not reach across the wild seas to foreign shores. This is a great tragedy, and it is a tragedy which is ours and for which we must answer.

     The deaths of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi and his family as a consequence of America’s raid on his home, not an arrest for crimes provable in a court of law but political assassinations, are rightly being compared in the media to the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi by Trump. This situates Biden and Trump on an equal level of criminal amorality and state terror.

    Before the stage of the world and history, it also generates moral equivalence between ISIS and America, as our enemies intend by their provocations as a strategy of delegitimation of a regime. I use this myself as a democracy activist, for the art of revolution is about claiming the moral high ground and the delegitimation of authority and seizing control of the narrative.

    Sending armies and police to enforce virtue through violence and repression is not only evil, it is also stupid; for it plays into the hands of the enemy. As Shakespeare teaches us in Henry V; “When lenity and cruelty play for kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.”

    There are still notable differences between Biden and Trump, and between the goals, values, and ideals of Democrats and Republicans, madness and treason among them. But today those differences became suddenly and horrifically more narrow, and I fear we will need more than the eye of a needle as a window to a better future.

    As written in my post of October 28 2019, Trump and al-Baghdadi: Parallel Lives and Reflections; The personal and historical forces which create tyrants and monsters among us have been a lifelong study of mine, aspects of a curiosity regarding the origins and nature of evil born of primary childhood traumas in the Bloody Thursday massacre ordered by Ronald Reagan against a student peace protest in Berkeley 1969 when I was nine and my near execution in Brazil at the age of fourteen defending street children from police bounty hunters, which echoes those of Maurice Blanchot in June 1944 by the Nazis and Dostoevsky’s in 1849 by Czarist police, informed by Jerzy Kosinski’s novel The Painted Bird and focused by the classic study of Adolf Hitler from his speeches and writings, The Psychopathic God by Robert G. L. Waite, both of which I read during high school. Thus I became fascinated by the intersections of literature, philosophy, history, and psychology, and chose the origins of evil as my lifelong field of study.

    As the world celebrates the death of al-Baghdadi, both tyrant and monster, and Trump claims credit in this the sole victory of his administration, as if for the trophy head of some dangerous beast shot by a guide while enjoying cocktails at the hunting camp, it may be interesting to compare the parallel lives, methods, and goals of Trump and al-Baghdadi.

      A full psychological and historical study of Trump and al-Baghdadi as figures of fascist terror and madness on a global political scale in the context of civilizational conflicts would require a book of Biblical proportions and thesis-level scholarship such as Waite’s brilliant work on Hitler. Here I note only some of the obvious alignments and congruences; both Trump and al-Baghdadi are megalomaniacs and psychopaths who seized power through manipulation of those who perceived themselves as victims and readily dehumanized others to change their status, using disruption of norms and a reimagination of reality through lies and misdirects to shape history, and enacted regimes of state terror and campaigns of religious and ethnic cleansing and of patriarchal misogyny and sexual violence against women.

     Of Trump we have a cornucopia of information; Dr Justin Frank’s book Trump on the Couch and The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President by Bandy X. Lee are excellent resources, particularly illuminating on Trump’s erotic relationship with his daughter, the fantasies of violence and power which are rooted in his childhood relationship with his tyrannical and abusive father, and his inability to love or empathize with others as a result of his abandonment by his mother.

      Pathological lies, poor impulse control, and grandiose fantasies and delusions complete the picture of a narcissistic personality and psychopathic predator. Trump cannot distinguish truth from lies and delusions; his madness and childlike feeble mindedness, the tantrums and psychotic rages, the bullying and narcissism of a spoiled brat, does not however absolve him of responsibility for his actions, or those of the treasonous cabal of sex predators and fascists he has gathered around him.

     How Trump’s particular madness is expressed in our national policy is a horror which can described with precision; his fear of contamination and faecal fixation translate into his signature campaign against nonwhite others and a policy of ethnic cleansing and racist state terror, his misogyny into a patriarchal wave of legal disempowerment of women’s reproductive rights, his fragile ego,  identity confusion, and need for attention into a governance of Nuremberg-like rallies, the cultivation of despicable autocrats, and the obsessive vengeance against anyone who refuses to offer adoration and submission.

     Above all what unites Trump, Hitler, and al-Baghdadi, as monsters and tyrants who reflect one another and as parallel figures and historical forces is the theory of politics as theatre of cruelty and government as performance art.  

     For their performances of leadership as clowns of terror and madness provide mirror opposite images of the reign of the Roman Emperor described with wit and guile by Antonin Artaud in his great novel Heliogabalus; or, the Crowned Anarchist, a figure who disrupted norms as an agent of change and chaos to transform an inert and ossified society, whereas Trump and al-Baghdadi have acted as partners in reaction to return us to a pre-democratic civilization.

      Trump claims to have killed his dark reflection and shadow self by his spurious arrogation of a victory won by our intelligence and military services; but history will always see this second face behind his mask, a secret twin he bears into eternity, a face of power and twisted desires unrestrained by the laws and values of a democratic civilization and a free society of equals: the face of Trump’s heart of darkness, al-Baghdadi.

    So I wrote on October 28 2019; and so I must write now of Biden’s secret face and heart of darkness, Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, linked now for eternity as figures of terror, murderous retribution, and cruelty.

    State terror and imperialism has met sectarian terror as organizations of institutionalized violence and power; we can only hope now that they will recognize their twin image in the mirror of death which war and acts of force and violence confront us with, and walk away from the precipice which threatens to consume us all.

     As Ken Kesey said in his historic speech to a peace protest against the war in Vietnam recorded in Tom Wolfe’s novel The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test; “The way to end war is just walk away and say fuck it. Just walk away and say fuck it.”

    As I wrote in retrospective of the Biden Presidency and re-election campaign in my post of July 22 2024 Genocide Joe Purged From Democratic Party Re-Election Campaign, Not As A War Criminal But As An Imbecile

     As with us all, and as a defining characteristic of human being, darkness and light exist in equal measure in Joe Biden as a mirror and figure of America, revolutionary and conservative forces in which our lives are embedded as an imposed condition of struggle and an eternal war in the human heart which both destroys and creates us ceaselessly in processes of adaptation and change.

    Here too are our histories, memories, identities chosen or authorized, which we drag behind us like an invisible reptilian tail; both those we must keep and those we must escape, and if we are very lucky they are not always the same.

    President Biden has withdrawn from the election campaign, not quite an abdication of power as he chose Kamala Harris as his successor who must now bear his vision of our nation as an inclusive and diverse free society of equals into the future as his and possibly our representative, and in many ways our avenger.

    So much remains to be done before the Restoration of America is complete, if such a thing can ever be; herein now I interrogate both the darkness and the light of Biden’s stewardship of America, for I write to you not to praise Caesar, but to bury him. Of his life work as part of the legacies of our history, what must we keep, and what must we escape? 

    As I wrote in my post of February 7 2023, How Is the Restoration of America Coming Along? Biden’s Second State of the Union Address; In his State of the Union address today Biden has roared defiance against fascist tyranny and terror, calling out the empires of Russia and China as well as the fascists of the January 6 Insurrection within the Republican Party as enemies of America and all humankind.

     A declaration of independence from fear and fascism, this speech; repeated endlessly throughout the world and human history by the magic of infinite lenses and a logosphere made of machines who remember ourselves and our world for us.

      How we reshape ourselves and our possible futures as a species of interdependent partners can be determined by such transforms of messages which order how we create human being, meaning, and value; and such systems of signs are a ground of struggle between falsification and those truths written in our flesh, for we wander lost in a wilderness of mirrors.

     Let us glory therefore in the ongoing Restoration of America, and Biden’s magnificent defiance of those who would enslave us, a wail of absurd hope echoing through chasms of darkness.

     Here following my journal of today as comparison is my post in reaction to last year’s State of the Union address, when before the Last Stand at Mariupol I believed peace was still possible, that democracy would triumph over tyranny, solidarity over division, truthtelling and the witness of history over falsification, that systemic and institutional patriarchy, racism, faith as state terror, and the commodification of exploitation capitalism could be reimagined and transformed as we progress toward a global United Humankind; though I yet dream of our species outgrowing states as embodied violence, narratives of identitarian nationalism, our addiction to power and subjugation by authority, and fear as the basis of human exchange, I now question whether we can find healing for the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     At Mariupol I witnessed our most probable future unfolding as the realization of systemic dehumanization and a consequence of politics as the art of fear; utter destruction and ruin, and our degradation to atavisms of instinct and monstrosity beyond the limits of the human.

     To become human is a forlorn hope; yet hope is a power which cannot be taken from us when all else is lost. Like the refusal to submit to authority, which confers freedom as a primary human act of self-creation and self-ownership as seizures of power, to hope is to enact revolutionary struggle, possibly the first such act as a causal force of change and transformation.

     With hope we may claw our way out of the ruins of civilization and make yet another Last Stand, beyond possibility of victory or even survival.

     What else do we have to resist with, which is an intrinsic and defining human quality and cannot be taken from us by those who would enslave us and steal our souls?

     Love, which transcends the limits of our form and of our modern pathology of disconnectedness, and returns to us our true and best selves as we see this in each other. To love is to discover and create ourselves anew, and this too cannot be bought and sold, unstoppable as the tides.

     Faith in each other as solidarity and the praxis of our values in action; as the Oath of the Resistance ends; “to abandon not our fellows.” As the line in the film Oz goes; “Because if you believe, anything is possible.” A marvelous film, which calls each of us to become our own wizard and best selves in our stewardship of others.

      Hope as freedom, love as equality, and faith as solidarity of action; such is the dream of America and democracy as a free society of equals.   

     As I wrote in my post of March 2 2022, State of the Union: the Restoration of America, Democracy, and Western Civilization; In the State of the Union address we have witnessed the Restoration of America as the primary guarantor of global democracy and our universal human rights, and of western civilization as a free society of equals founded in the Forum of Athens as a self-critical system designed to question its own authority, to change and adapt through revolutionary innovation and discovery while protecting our four primary values and ideals; freedom, equality, truth, and justice. Of all this President Biden is our chosen and undisputable champion, of America and of all humankind.

    I would like to name and invoke another ideal, that of peace; but peace and the abandonment of the social use of force and violence is elusive. We forebear for now to send armies of Liberation to Ukraine; but I have found that the use of force is contingent on the level of threat and fear, and how long this will hold if Putin begins attacking NATO with nuclear weapons as he has declared his intent to do is a thing to ponder with great dread.

     Our possible futures hold many which are nothingness and the annihilation of humankind; and many more in which centuries of world war and an age of tyranny shape us to the monstrous purposes of authoritarian power and institutionalized violence, in which our dehumanization, falsification, and commodification by those who would enslave us and steal our souls impose degradation beyond the limits of the human, and we awake one day to a brave new world of posthuman species for whom we are the mythic demons who poisoned and destroyed the earth.

    Such is the vision of our possible futures I beheld in the moment of my Awakening, a term which enters popular culture from Buddhism, when I was hurled from my body by the pressure wave of a grenade thrown by a policeman into a crowd of protestors at the age of nine, during the Bloody Thursday Massacre, May 15 1969, People’s Park Berkeley, the most terrible incident of domestic state terror in American history.

    Myriads of possibilities of becoming human were impressed on the mind of a child as I stood outside of time and the limits of myself, like a seed of change and transformation, a moment from which alternate destinies and intentions unfold. In far too few of them, something like ourselves can look back across millennia at this time when liberty and tyranny hang in the balance.

     On this seventh day of the Invasion of Ukraine, as the UN and EU announce solidarity actions with Ukraine and resistance to Russia timed to coordinate with Biden’s State of the Union address, we fight for liberty versus tyranny in both Ukraine and Russia, and for the future of global democracy and the survival of humankind.

     In his historic speech last night, Joe Biden warned Vladimir Putin: ‘Freedom Will Always Triumph Over Tyranny’. It’s up to us now, to make it real.

    Lest all that we have ever dreamed and been or may ever be is lost.

     As written by Alan Moore in V For Vendetta; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”   

       In the balance against all of this glorious championing of democracy against Trump’s fascist capture of the state as a theocratic-patriarchal tyranny of Gideonite sexual terror and white supremacist terror, we have the abjection,  failure of empathy, and abandonment of the idea of universal human rights of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians, in which Genocide Joe has made us all complicit. He several times sent war materiel to Israel, refused to enact  Boycott, Sanction, and Divestiture to silence the bombs and end the war, to bring Netanyahu to justice as a war criminal, or to join the civilized nations of the world in declaring the state of Israel a terrorist regime. Hence the chant of the Cheerleaders For Change; “Genocide Joe has got to go,” and now he has.

      For myself, Biden’s mental competence is irrelevant; if this were a bar for being a President, Trump would have never been one either. America is a geriocracy ruled by men whose ideas were formed fifty years ago. But genocide and crimes against humanity are a line we must not cross, not and remain human beings, and if you do such things I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

     Biden is the second American President to have tried to kill me personally, and the only one I voted for; the other being then-Governor Ronald Reagan when he ordered the police to open fire on the student Divest From Israel protesters at UC Berkeley in 1969 on Bloody Thursday, the most massive incident of state terror since the Civil War. Over fifty years later, Biden chose not to join our global sanction of Israeli war supply shipping or our counter-blockade of the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza, which a Fleet Carrier Group could have broken if necessary to deliver food and medicine to civilians, but to destroy our drone positions with his own drones.   

     As I wrote in my post of March 6 2024, Super Tuesday Confronts Us With A Grim Choice Of Futures, and We Must Change the Rules of the Game;  As I have often said since the October 7 terrorist attack which has upended the political landscape of America in our year of elections between tyranny and liberty, If you enable or enact genocide and crimes against humanity, I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

     Yet this election may decide the survival of democracy and humankind across the coming several centuries, and I now calculate our chances to escape an Age of Tyranny and wars of unimaginable horrors at less than two percent; I say again, I believe that in less than two possible futures out of every one hundred, something resembling ourselves can look at the ruins of our civilization and our species a millennium from now with questioning and wonder. With all of our technology and our understanding, why did we choose to annihilate ourselves?

     The dangers of ideological fracture and division cannot be overstated; the IWW global union movement self destructed over the issue of peace during World War One, as did the Social Democrats in Germany, removing our respective blocking forces for the rise of fascism and resulting in the Second World War; there are many other and more recent examples of movements for change and progress being shattered by forces of reaction and the state, but these two will serve to illustrate what will happen next if Trump once again captures the state.

     We must unite in solidarity together to confront this threat and drive fascist tyranny from the stage of history.

     Yet Biden’s massive and extralegal supply of Israel with war material while it is used to rain death of the people of Gaza, on the absurd pretext that the criminals who attacked Israel claim to act in their name as a strategy of subjugation of the Palestinians to their theocratic rule, such decisions by Biden personally have made all of us as Americans complicit in genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and other crimes against humanity.

      To this I say; Never Again!

      Our choice is now to abandon either democracy and all of our rights as citizens, or the idea of our universal human rights and our historic role as their guarantor throughout the world. I’d like to keep both democracy and human rights.

     How can we do this and win a future for humankind as a free society of equals who are guarantors of each other’s rights as citizens and as human beings?

     If this is our goal, and with the imposed conditions of struggle as they have resolved themselves on Super Tuesday wherein Trump and Biden will face off once again in the sudden death match of futures that is our Presidential election, only one course of action remains for us which bears any hope for the triumph of liberty over tyranny; change the rules of the game.

      I’m sure we can all think of many possibilities for bringing change with such a mission, but tonight I find myself enchanted with the idea of liberating Biden from Biden as articulated by Michael Moore. Who better to trust as our moral compass than the author of V For Vendetta, who wrote the immortal words; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”

       Here are my thoughts on our elections in a less hopeful moment, in my post of January 4 2023, On America’s Complicity In Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes In Gaza; Biden has made us all complicit in ethnic cleansing in Gaza, war crimes our taxes pay for. America has abandoned the idea of our universal human rights. Our nation has fallen, and with it global civilization based on humanist values and democracy.

     Nothing remains to be saved; maybe the Rights of Man and America as a free society of equals was always a performance, lies and illusions designed to distract us from the fact that we are all slaves of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege, and the state merely institutions of force and control.

      Joe Biden has betrayed us, failed to place his life and ours in the balance with those of the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, and instead enabled and conspired in crimes against humanity with Netanyahu and the theocratic fascist settler regime and imperial conquest and dominion of the state of Israel, which learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis.

     And this we must resist, beyond hope of victory or survival, in solidarity as guarantors of each others humanity. To fascism of blood, faith, and soil and to state tyranny and terror regardless of where it surfaces or in whose interest it is perpetrated, we must give the only reply it merits; Never Again!                  

     To this my unfiltered reaction to a Joe Biden campaign fundraising post timed to leverage the despair and torment of others in service to power, a comment has articulated one of the primary arguments in the apologetics of power; that we cannot control our proxy state, and secondarily that the crimes against humanity of Israel have the mandate of popular support here in America which place us all with Biden in the fork of a dilemma.

     Here is the comment in question; “oh, come on. Dramatic much? Netanyahu is the criminal, Biden doesn’t control him, and cannot abandon our strongest ally in the region. Half the country wants to see Hamas wiped out, so what should Biden do? Listen just to this side? Get real.”

     To this I replied; Yes, Netanyahu is a war criminal, but Biden has not only refused to stop funding ethnic cleansing, but has sent military aid to Israel and made us all complicit. We have abandoned the idea of universal human rights in funding the random mass murders of civilians with our taxes, voting to block the UN from bringing Netanyahu to trial for war crimes, and refusal to use our powers of Boycott, Divest, and Sanction to stop the Gaza War and bring democracy to Israel with regime change and the reimagination and transformation of systems of unequal power and state tyranny and terror.

       Our nation has chosen to send warships to the perpetrator, and not humanitarian aid to the victims, when we could easily have broken the Israeli blockade of food, water, and medical relief with our immense Navy, and silenced the bombs. It is not only the humanity of the Palestinians which has been abrogated here, but of our own as well.

     In fact America does control Israel as a client state through our taxes and military support, but to what ends? Do we advance the cause of secular democracy or theocratic tyranny, of peace or war, liberty or submission to force and control, of our universal human rights or hierarchies of elite membership and exclusionary otherness based on divisions of race and faith?

     In a region of one people divided by history and in our own nation, are we building bridges or walls?

     Biden was elected to lead the Restoration of America after the loathsome regime of Traitor Trump, and has betrayed us. There is nothing left of us to save.

     America has fallen, both as a democracy due to the capture of the Republican Party by a fascist-theocratic Fourth Reich and the subversions of our institutions and ideals by the Trump regime of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror, and because of the Democratic Party’s refusal to confront evil and purge our destroyers from among us, both in our client state of Israel and here in America in the wake of the January 6 Insurrection. All of this generates from the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; fear weaponized in service to power by those who would enslave us as divisions of belonging and exclusionary otherness, and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil.

     In Gaza we see the inevitable results of this process of dehumanization, for to make an idea about a kind of people is an act of violence, and no matter where one begins with othering we always end up at the gates of Auschwitz. And this we must Resist.

      Why must we be each other’s jailors, and not each other’s liberators?

     Who do we want to become, we humans; masters and slaves, or a free society of equals?

    Get real, ends the apologetics of power, referencing the Realpolitik of Henry Kissinger used so infamously to authorize our imperial wars in Vietnam and Central America including the Mayan Genocide in Guatemala, the assassination of Salvador Allende in Chile, and the massacres of the Suharto regime of Indonesia. A foreign policy modeled on Hitler’s dictum; “Who now remembers the extermination of the Armenians? The world respects only power” does not lead to a more humane future, nor to a United Humankind and a free society of equals.

     In this injunction to get real and its legacies of history bearing horrors, atrocities, and crimes against humanity as state policy and fear become an engine of destruction, there are embedded issues and forces central to the questions of our humanity and how we choose to be human together; what is truth, who is authorized to question it, and how can we engage in the sacred calling to pursue the truth without falsification by the lies and illusions of propaganda?

      We wander in a Wilderness of Mirrors, wherein all claims must be questioned, especially those of authorities who claim to speak and act for us as a strategy of subjugation and the manufacture of consent. To this I can but say, democracy requires an electorate able to perform the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen; Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

    Get real, we are exhorted by those who wish to steal our power. In Gaza, real people are dying because we are willing to sacrifice their lives to our power.

      As I wrote in my post of January 24 2024 Now Begins the Last Stand Against Fascism In America: Our 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, and Why I Am Voting For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For President of the United States; “When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler hand is the surest winner”; so wrote Shakespeare in Henry V, and for all of us, all who now live or ever will, in America and throughout the world, I hope this is still true.

    Next November, we will see.

    The test of the New Hampshire Primary has left only Biden and Trump on the field as contenders for the title, and I can vote for neither of them.

     Israel has unleashed The Nothing in Gaza, a rain of fire and death paid for with our taxes and enabled by Biden the Baby Killer who has made us all complicit in ethnic cleansing and genocide, and in so doing has abandoned our historic role as a guarantor of universal human rights.

     What are we, we Americans, if not a Band of Brothers who are guarantors of each other’s humanity?

     As I wrote to Biden in open letter here in October and have performed in organizing Resistance in Palestine and Israel, and in direct action in the counter-blockade of the Red Sea Campaign to break the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid to Palestine; If you commit genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, I cannot vote for you, and I will fight you.

      On August 18 2020 I declared for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as President of the United States in the 2024 election, and subsequent history only confirms my decision.

      There are other issues I have with Biden remaining as the leader of the Restoration of America; first, he began his career occupying the space of George Wallace as a leader of white supremacists against school integration and bussing, exactly opposite Bernie Sanders, which tells me everything I need to know about a man and where his heart is. Second, he was with Bush an architect of the Iraq War, a vast war crime planned at Haliburton in Texas to seize oil fields for Bush’s patrons, and of the Patriot Act which placed America under martial law and militarized the police as an army of Occupation. Third, he acted as chief silencer of women’s voices in the Anita Hill trial which defended the patriarchal right of seigneur and left Justice Thomas in place to monkeywrench our democracy.

       For myself, the turning point in my understanding of Biden and his role as enforcer of elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege rather than a liberator came with his assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, which placed him in moral equivalence to Trump and the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

      As I wrote in my post of February 4 2022, A Stain of Cruelty: the Assassination of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi; To paraphrase the line from Hamlet and Star Trek in season one, episode 13, The Conscience of the King; There’s a stain of cruelty on your armor, President Biden.

    We have answered terror and death with terror and death, and this is both tragic and shameful. Force cannot answer force, nor heal the flaws of our humanity.

    As written for CNN by Barbara Starr, Oren Liebermann, Jeremy Herb and Eyad Kourdi; “It was the biggest US raid in the country since the 2019 operation that killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

     Biden spoke from the White House Thursday morning to announce that the operation had taken “a major terrorist leader off the battlefield.”

     “Thanks to the bravery of our troops, this horrible terrorist leader is no more,” Biden said from the Roosevelt Room. “Knowing that terrorist had chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a Special Forces raid at a much a greater risk to our own people rather than targeting him with an airstrike.”

    Now and then Biden reminds us all that he was among the principal collaborators in Bush’s invasion of Iraq as imperial conquest and colonial plunder to seize the strategic resource of oil by which America maintains a global hegemony of wealth, power, and privilege, an addiction which will result in the extinction of humankind as a species, and in the authorization through the Patriot Act of a carceral state of brutal force and pervasive surveillance and thought control exceeded only by Xin Jinping’s holocaust of the Uighurs of Xinjiang, which has enabled the most massive theft of our freedoms in our history, including the McCarthy era, and the most bizarre and reprehensible regime of torture, most infamous in the crimes against humanity perpetrated at Guantanamo and other secret prisons for political enemies of the regime and its oligarchic, plutocratic, and corporate robber baron paymasters, including even the grisly hysteria of the Salem Witch Trials.

    Once again our heroes and champions are proven to have feet of clay, and I mourn the failure of moral vision and addiction to power and the use of force and violence of President Biden, our government, and America as a guarantor of universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

    On this day and all too often, the Promethean Fire of the Torch of Liberty which illuminates the gates of our nation in New York Harbor did not reach across the wild seas to foreign shores. This is a great tragedy, and it is a tragedy which is ours and for which we must answer.

     The deaths of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi and his family as a consequence of America’s raid on his home, not an arrest for crimes provable in a court of law but political assassinations, are rightly being compared in the media to the assassination of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi by Trump. This situates Biden and Trump on an equal level of criminal amorality and state terror.

    Before the stage of the world and history, it also generates moral equivalence between ISIS and America, as our enemies intend by their provocations as a strategy of delegitimation of a regime. I use this myself as a democracy activist, for the art of revolution is about claiming the moral high ground and the delegitimation of authority and seizing control of the narrative.

    Sending armies and police to enforce virtue through violence and repression is not only evil, it is also stupid; for it plays into the hands of the enemy. As Shakespeare teaches us in Henry V; “When lenity and cruelty play for kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.”

    There are still notable differences between Biden and Trump, and between the goals, values, and ideals of Democrats and Republicans, madness and treason among them. But today those differences became suddenly and horrifically more narrow, and I fear we will need more than the eye of a needle as a window to a better future.

     As written by Jonathan Cohn in The Guardian, in an article entitled How History Might Remember Joe Biden’s Presidency; “Millions of new jobs, many in a flourishing new American manufacturing sector geared toward clean energy.

     Higher prices at the grocery store, but also more dollars in paychecks.

     A record low in the number of Americans without health insurance, plus a historic — if fleeting — reduction in child poverty.

     Stronger international alliances, amid a bloody invasion of Ukraine and civilian catastrophe in the Middle East.

     These are among the major developments tied to policy initiatives of Joe Biden’s presidency — which, because of his decision not to seek reelection, will end one way or another by Jan. 20, 2025. By any reasonable standard, they add up to a tenure of enormous consequence.

     In less than four years, policy choices from the Biden administration have changed literally millions of lives in the U.S. and around the world, and maybe altered the course of climate change as well. It’s no exaggeration to say his record rivals that of any first-term president in the last half-century.

     Still, it’s early to render definitive judgments on his policy legacy. Too much depends on seeing how his initiatives and decisions play out over time, what precise effects they have and, most immediately, whether his accomplishments even outlast his time in the White House.

     If Donald Trump ends up winning in November, he’ll surely have something to say about that.

     A Signature Piece Of Legislation

     Biden’s signature achievement is the Inflation Reduction Act, the sweeping legislation that passed Congress on a party-line vote and that the president signed in August 2022. The name is misleading: Its central component is a massive federal investment in clean energy that, projections suggest, could add up to more than $1 trillion by the time all the money is accounted for.

     Together with a series of regulations that effectively reduce incentives to create carbon emissions, the law’s investments have spurred a boom in factory-building and manufacturing. The proof of the impact is in the solar arrays and wind turbines popping up all across the Southwest and the Great Plains, along with the electric vehicle plants rising in the Midwest and across a new “Battery Belt” in the South. These projects mean employment, and represent a significant chunk of the estimated 15 million jobs that the U.S. has created during Biden’s presidency.

     The other big piece of the Inflation Reduction Act — and one that, in spirit, hews closer to the name of the legislation — is a series of measures designed to reduce the price of health care, including pharmaceuticals.

     The Inflation Reduction Act allows the federal government to negotiate directly with manufacturers, imposes penalties for rapid price hikes, and imposes a $35 cap on insulin for seniors and people with disabilities. Most of the provisions affect only Medicare, and even then only some drugs. But the law gives the federal government authority that counterparts abroad have long had, and that U.S. lawmakers in the future can expand.

     Yet another Inflation Reduction Act provision offers extra financial assistance for individuals buying insurance through the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. These new subsidies can reduce the cost of insurance by hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year. They are a big reason the proportion of Americans without insurance fell to 7.7%, the lowest level ever.

     Action On Health Care, The Economy

     The other factor in bringing down the number of uninsured people was a temporary, pandemic-related prohibition on states reviewing and disenrolling people from Medicaid. That prohibition has ended, which means the uninsured rate is likely to creep up in the next year or two.

     The poverty level among children has already come back up, following a record-setting decline that was tied to yet another pandemic measure — namely, a set of tax breaks and direct cash payments in the American Rescue Plan, a Democratic bill that Biden signed shortly after taking office.

     Biden and Democratic leaders had hoped to make some of those relief measures permanent. Their efforts to round up the votes fell just short. But the American Rescue Plan did what it was supposed to do: It buoyed the economy and sustained tens of millions of American households, at a time when COVID-19 and the reaction to it threatened to plunge the nation into a full-blown depression.

     All policies have trade-offs, of course. The massive public expenditures behind those relief efforts likely contributed to inflation, which peaked at 9.1% in 2022. People felt it viscerally when they bought food or clothing, put gas in their car, or tried to buy a house. But inflation was a worldwide phenomenon, tied to supply chain problems and other pandemic-related factors.

     Inflation has since come back down, at least in the U.S., while wages are up and unemployment is hovering near 50-year lows. Analysts and leaders abroad have noticed, even if American voters haven’t, and editors at The Economist have been marveling at “America’s astonishing economic record.”

     Building an economy that can continue to thrive in the future has been a big focus of Biden’s, and led to the enactment of two other major laws: the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which allocated more than $850 billion for everything from laying broadband lines to repairing dilapidated bridges, and the CHIPS and Science Act, which put nearly $300 billion into high-tech research and development. Both passed Congress with significant Republican votes, remarkable in itself given the polarization in U.S. politics.

     Issuing Regulations, Appointing Judges

     Biden didn’t achieve any of this alone. He worked closely with congressional leaders, as presidents always do. He also had the benefit of a (mostly) united Democratic caucus that, though smaller in size than its Obama-era counterpart, had a more liberal orientation with far fewer conservative dissenters.

     The dissenters still mattered, enough to kill what Biden had hoped would be another major achievement: historic investment in the care economy intended to raise wages of child care workers and home health aides, while making it easier for families to pay for those services.

     An attempt to pass bipartisan immigration reforms failed as well, leaving the Biden administration without the tools to address a surge in border crossings that has put a major and ongoing strain on city and state governments responsible for the migrants.

     But throughout his presidency, Biden used regulatory power to make incremental progress on long-sought goals he couldn’t achieve through legislation — by hiking the minimum wage for federal workers, for example, or forgiving college debt for targeted populations.

     Regulatory changes are easier than laws for subsequent administrations to reverse, and they can run into successful legal challenges. That’s especially true when lower courts heavily populated with Trump-appointed judges are applying principles handed down from a conservative Supreme Court majority hell-bent on scaling back federal regulatory authority.

     But Biden has done what he could to provide some ideological balance by putting more than 200 judges on the federal bench, more or less matching Trump’s rate for the same time span. That includes the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who in 2022 became the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court.

     Jackson is just 53 years old, which means she can keep writing opinions defending causes like reproductive rights for decades to come. And although today she’s stuck putting most of those arguments into dissents with her two fellow liberal justices, she might be around long enough to see the court’s majority evolve or change, so that it retreats from its decadeslong march to the right.

     Alliances, Wars And Diplomacy

     The other area where presidents have more authority to act on their own is foreign policy. And there, Biden has left some especially clear marks, though frequently in ways that were — and remain — controversial.

     He pulled American forces out of Afghanistan for good, a goal his predecessors and (according to polls) the public supported, and evacuated some 70,000 Afghan allies in the process. But 13 U.S. service members and dozens of civilians died in a bombing during the chaotic withdrawal, which ultimately left behind tens of thousands of Afghan allies hoping to escape — and left the Taliban once again in charge of the country.

     More recently, Biden has strongly backed Israel ever since Hamas militants attacked the country and massacred civilians on Oct. 7, 2023. Biden has pushed back only tepidly — and, by most accounts, ineffectively — against an Israeli response that has literally flattened much of Gaza, killing tens of thousands of people and leaving many more in dire, life-threatening humanitarian conditions.

     In both instances, it’s hard to know exactly what has happened, or what could have happened in alternative scenarios, given the factual ambiguities of armed conflict and the secretive nature of diplomacy. Biden’s handiwork and its impact are clearer when it comes to NATO, which, appropriately enough, held its 75th anniversary summit in Washington just a few weeks ago.

     Biden led efforts to expand the alliance with the addition of Finland and Sweden, and to strengthen it by drawing larger financial and troop contributions from member states. In 2022, Biden organized international backing for Ukraine following Russia’s invasion, providing diplomatic, financial and military support that are still propping up the country today.

     The Legacy At Stake In November

     America’s support of Ukraine could be one of the first things to go in a second Trump presidency. Trump, whose affinity for Russian President Vladimir Putin is no secret, has pledged to demand a cessation of hostilities under terms most analysts think would be highly favorable to the Russians. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), who is now Trump’s running mate, has led calls in Congress for stopping Ukraine aid.

     But the list of Biden accomplishments that Trump could reverse doesn’t stop there.

     Trump has said he wants to take away the big push for clean energy, vowing to end what he calls the “electric vehicle mandate” on “day one.” He has said he still wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act, just like he tried so desperately to do in 2017, posting on his Truth Social platform that “Obamacare sucks!” and promising the same mythical replacement he always touts but never specifies. Even if Trump decides against another run at full repeal, he seems unlikely to support renewal of Biden’s extra insurance subsidies, the funding for which runs out in 2025.

     It’s difficult to be certain exactly which of these priorities Trump might pursue or when, because he doesn’t make concrete policy commitments or issue detailed policy papers in the traditional way. But credible guides to his behavior are out there.

     In addition to documents like Project 2025, the right-wing governing agenda his current and former aides have put together, there’s the historical record from his last turn in office, when he signed legislation reopening the Arctic wildlife lands for drilling, undid new civil rights protections for the LGBTQ+ community, and reversed countless immigration directives.

     Biden on the campaign trail warned about the threat to his administration’s accomplishments, lamenting that all of his new laws and regulations — and their effects on daily life — haven’t gotten the attention they deserve. He had a point. Awareness of his accomplishments is so low that Republican lawmakers frequently felt comfortable taking credit for benefits in their districts or states, even when they had voted against them in Congress.

     History’s verdict is likely to be more accurate and more laudatory, because with time, it will be easier to take the full measure of what Biden has really done. But a lot depends on how many of his achievements survive. That’s why the best thing Biden may have done for his legacy is giving another, more capable Democrat a fighting chance to protect it.”

     As written by Martin Pengelly in The Guardian, in an article entitled The tragedy and resilience of Joe Biden: a look back at a life in politics: The oldest-ever American president’s political career began in 1972 and culminates as he yields to pressure to step aside; “Joe Biden’s historic decision on Sunday to step down as the Democratic nominee for president signals an imminent end to one of the most consequential American political careers.

     At 81, the oldest president ever sworn in has finally yielded to time – and his own party. Someone else, possibly the vice-president, Kamala Harris, will face Donald Trump in November.

     Biden, who endorsed Harris on Sunday, will remain in the White House until January. But Democrats and Republicans will soon survey something new: a political landscape without Biden at its centre.

     Born in Pennsylvania in 1942, Biden attended the University of Delaware and Syracuse law school, became a public defender, then entered politics. A natural campaigner, in 1972, at just 29, he ran for US Senate, scoring a huge upset over J Caleb Boggs, a two-term Republican more than twice his age.

     The same year, voters gave Richard Nixon a landslide win. Nixon was the 37th president. In 2021, Biden would become the 46th. In that 49-year span, as eight presidents came and went, Biden was a senator for 36 years, vice-president for eight.

     As a junior senator, Biden suffered his first, but not last, tragedy when a car crash killed his wife, Neilia Biden, and one-year-old daughter, Naomi, at Christmas in 1972. Biden became known for riding the rails, from Delaware to Washington DC and back, to care for his sons, Beau and Hunter, who survived the accident.

     He married his second wife, Jill Jacobs, in 1977, and their daughter, Ashley,  was born four years later.

     For 17 years, Biden was a ranking member or chair of the Senate judiciary committee. He led five supreme court confirmations. In 1991 the nominee, Clarence Thomas, was accused of sexual harassment and Biden was widely seen to have mishandled the hearings. In 2019, he said Thomas’s accuser, Anita Hill, “did not get treated well. I take responsibility for that.”

     Biden’s record on crime would also haunt him, particularly his support for a 1994 bill many say contributed to problems of mass incarceration and racial injustice. Another 1994 bill, banning assault weapons, remained a source of pride.

     For 11 years, Biden was chair or ranking member of the foreign relations committee. In 1991, he voted against the Gulf war. In 2002, after 9/11, he voted for the invasion of Iraq. He later said that vote was wrong.

     In 1987, Biden first ran for president. At 45, he sought comparison with John F Kennedy but as reported by Richard Ben Cramer in the campaign classic What It Takes, youth, ambition and drive were not enough to prevent embarrassing failure.

     Biden took to quoting Neil Kinnock, then Labour leader in Britain, about being the first member of his family to go to college. Unfortunately, Biden stopped saying he was quoting.

    Kinnock didn’t mind but the US press did. Biden’s freewheeling speaking style (and accompanying evocations of his Irish ancestry) often left him open to error. But he was undoubtedly an effective communicator, all the more remarkably so given he stammered as a child.

     Months after abandoning his presidential campaign, Biden suffered a brain aneurysm so severe a priest was called to administer last rites. Months later, he suffered another.

     He was nothing if not resilient. Twenty years later, he ran for president again. A great debate stage line, about a Republican rival, went down in history: “Rudy Giuliani, there’s only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun, a verb and 9/11.” But Biden soon dropped out.

    Barack Obama won the nomination. When the Illinois senator, 47, picked Biden, 66, as his running mate, the New York Times said Obama had acquired “a longtime Washington hand” who could “reassure voters” rather than “deliver a state or reinforce [a] message of change”.

     Biden spent eight years as vice-president, his working relationship with Obama, reporting suggested, not quite so close as it was often portrayed. Biden played key roles in successes including advancing LGBTQ+ rights, legislating to prevent violence against women and securing healthcare reform. A push for gun reform failed.

     Biden eyed a third presidential run but in 2015 the death of his son Beau from brain cancer took a terrible toll. Furthermore, Obama backed Hillary Clinton.

     Amid the chaos of the Trump years, Biden decided to run again. Significant support from Black voters propelled a primary win. In the year of Covid, campaign travel was limited. For a 77-year-old candidate, that wasn’t much of a problem. Come the election, Biden won by more than 7m votes and with electoral college ease.

     The first major book on 2020 was called Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency. Regardless, his campaign message about a “battle for the soul of America” fueled two productive years. With congressional Democrats, Biden secured major legislation, boosting the economy after Covid, securing infrastructure investment and funding the climate crisis fight.

     Trump had incited an attack on Congress, but Trumpism would not die. Republicans took back the House. Biden oversaw foreign policy disaster – the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan – and success, marshalling support for Ukraine against Russia.

     The dam could not hold. Questions about Biden’s age and fitness ran at a hum before the disastrous debate in Atlanta in June saw Democratic dissent burst through.

     At first, Biden displayed characteristic fire, blaming “elites” to which he never felt he belonged, vowing to fight on. But then Trump survived an assassination attempt and emerged seemingly stronger than ever.

     Democratic calls for Biden to quit grew louder. Eventually, he heard them.”

     Where does this leave us now? In a crisis of legitimacy within the Democratic Party as a united front of Resistance to Trump, the Party of Treason, and the capture of the state by the Fourth Reich.

    We have brought the Chaos, and created a space of free play in which anything is possible through delegitimation, fracture, and disruption of Biden’s regime of complicity in Israeli terror and tyranny; now we must act in Solidarity to utterly destroy and renounce as a nation the Republican Party and its subversion of democracy set forth in Project 2025, a blueprint for theocratic fascist tyranny.

      But we must also use this liminal time of chaotization to reimagine and transform our own vision of the future, and to make the Green New Deal, Universal Healthcare including access to abortion, and the liberation of Palestine and regime change in Israel intrinsic core policies of the Democratic Party platform and this November of America.

    Let us dream a better future than we have the past.

     As I wrote in my post of June 27 2024, This Is Bullshit: the First Biden-Trump Debate of the 2024 Presidential Election;  This is bullshit.

     Two antique visions of America battle for our future, Traitor Trump the fascist tyrant and Russian agent whose mission is to bring down democracy, versus Genocide Joe the neoliberal who made us complicit in crimes against humanity in Gaza and refuses to protect free speech and rights of protest at universities, abandoning both our rights as citizens and our universal human rights. Our choice of futures is now between a theocratic white supremacist patriarchy led by a rapist, and the Bill of Rights made meaningless. All other issues are misdirections and a Wilderness of Mirrors.

     A few short days ago, Biden set hero of the people Julian Assange free, a victory for the transparency of the state and our freedoms of information, speech, and press, but with conditions which echo those offered to the IWW unionists imprisoned by the state long ago for mobilizing against capital and the commodification and dehumanization of the working class. Biden has not championed our rights, but rid his regime of an embarrassing prisoner at the cost of our rights and in abandonment of the idea of journalism as a sacred calling to pursue of truth.

     Who thinks Biden is on the side of the people against tyranny, after this? Biden, who began his career leading white separatists against school integration, chief silencer of women’s witness in the Anita Hill trial which bequeathed us the kleptocratic grifter Clarence Thomas, architect of the invasion of Iraq to steal oil wells as a strategic resource of imperial dominion? And who has done nothing to disarm the police as institutional white supremacist terror, nothing to abolish racist terror at our border and replace ICE and Border Patrol with a mercy force to provide safe conduct for migrants, nothing to disarm Israel and end our complicity in genocide.

     There are vast differences between Biden and Trump, madness, treason, and fascism among them, but this does not make the Democratic Party’s soft tyranny less terrible than the Republican Party’s theocratic patriarchal sexual terror and Nazi white supremacist terror.

      There is but one path forward to a future free of both kinds of tyranny and terror; Let us bring the Chaos and transformative change, and create a true free society of equals and a United Humankind.

     Now is the time to reimagine and transform ourselves and our nation; there is no better time, and there may be no other time.

A Man’s a Man for a’ That sung by Maggie Drennon

Biden’s Madison Speech

What I see when Amy Klobuchar talks:

The Best of Mrs. Maisel’s Stand Up | The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel | Prime Video

    Herein my absurd desires signpost an important truth about our politics; we are offered Baudrillardian images which bypass reason to live among our vast sea of consciousness as liminal states, uncontrollable and bearing transformative power, and no two of us construe meaning in the same way. Our realities are personalized and a dark mirror of the source world beyond; this is why it is impossible to combat lies with truths, because they are all the same once they live within us.

Heliogabalus; or, the Crowned Anarchist, by Antonin Artaud

The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, by Tom Wolfe

Henry V, by William Shakespeare Folger Edition

Trump on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President, by Justin A. Frank

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President, by Bandy X. Lee

The Psychopathic God, by Robert G.L. Waite

The Painted Bird, by Jerzy Kosiński

The Idiot, by Fyodor Dostoevsky

The Instant of My Death / Demeure: Fiction and Testimony, by Maurice Blanchot, Jacques Derrida

                     Biden in his glory:

Biden’s Democracy Versus Tyranny Speech on MSN

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/watch-president-joe-bidens-full-prime-time-address/vi-AA11nl2W?category=foryou

Joe Biden’s political career across the decades – in pictures

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2024/jul/22/joe-bidens-political-career-across-the-decades-in-pictures?CMP=share_btn_link

The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden’s White House and the Struggle for America’s Future, Franklin Foer

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/136342747-the-last-politician?ref=rae_2

Joe Biden: A Life of Trial and Redemption, Jules Witcover

V For Vendetta film trailer

Darkest Hour: You cannot Reason With a Tiger When Your Head Is In Its Mouth

Oz the Great and Powerful trailer

https://www.amazon.com/vdp/8e361880fe0d489bbcb9450f65e99d7d

    I thought this was the Presidential debate; when they tell you the day of your deliverance is at hand, you should be running.

Masque of the Red Death full movie

The 48 hours that consigned Joe Biden’s 2024 candidacy to history

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/22/joe-biden-election-drops-out?CMP=share_btn_url

Full 2023 President Biden State of the Union annotated and fact-checked – CNN

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2023/02/annotated-fact-checked-president-biden-sotu/

How History Might Remember Joe Biden’s Presidency

The tragedy and resilience of Joe Biden: a look back at a life in politics:

The oldest-ever American president’s political career began in 1972 and culminates as he yields to pressure to step aside

Biden endorses Kamala Harris for president after dropping out of race

Biden’s selfless decision to drop out sets stage for an entirely different election

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/21/biden-decision-drop-analysis?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1mCUJ9bsUGkbJFOWcgClN7HkzinD_skVBQcyRfcdMg2S8KmWPrtb_4NXY_aem_Pu_-TnB9skATSY_mccr9Tw

                      Songs of Light

August 12 2022  Hope For the Survival of Humankind: Biden’s Climate Bill

July 8 2022 Biden Signs Order Protecting Women’s Rights of Reproduction and Bodily Autonomy

January 12 2022 “The Battle for the Soul of America Is Not Over”; Biden Calls for the End of White Supremacist State Terror as Vote Suppression and the Theft of Black Citizenship

December 11 2021 Biden’s Summit For Democracy: Who Do We Want to Become, and What Are We Willing to Do to Free Ourselves From Those Who Would Enslave Us?

November 9 2021 Restoring the Balance: Anniversary of Biden’s Historic Call For Unity “Let Us End This Grim Era Of Demonization”

April 19 2021 Biden Proclaims the End of America’s War in Afghanistan: Hooray, and Good Luck With That

March 12 2021 Triumph and Transformation in Biden’s Restoration of America: the American Rescue Plan

                  Songs of Darkness

June 27 2024 This Is Bullshit: the First Biden-Trump Debate of the 2024 Presidential Election

February 27 2024 Biden’s 2024 Electoral Campaign, A Referendum On the Idea and Meaning of Our Universal Human Rights and the Historic Role of America as Their Guarantor and a Beacon of Hope to the World: Case of the Uncommitted Protest Vote in the Michigan Primary

February 9 2024 Why Do I Write, and Why Am I Writing To All of You Here, in the Nakedness of my Life, my Voice, and my Truth, as America Begins Her Last Stand Against Fascism in the 2024 Elections

January 24 2024 Now Begins the Last Stand Against Fascism In America: Our 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, and Why I Am Voting For Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez For President of the United States

January 8 2024 We Descend Into the Maelstrom of World War Three, Having Abandoned Our Historic Misson As a Guarantor of Democracy and Our Universal Human Rights

January 4 2024 On America’s Complicity In Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes In Gaza

December 8 2023 The Fall of America as a Guarantor of Democracy and Human Rights

May 20 2025 On Femicide As the Terminal Stage of Misogyny and Systems of Patriarchal Theocratic Sexual Terror

      Holocausts, Inquisitions, Crusades, witch hunts, lynchings, slavery, wars of imperial conquest and dominion; none of this begins with mass death and terror, but with the othering of some as the raw materiel for the wealth and power of elites, with divisions of identity and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil, and most especially with the idea of male privilege, our most ancient and universal system of unequal power and oppression.

     Recently I unfriended someone I went to high school with and just a few days ago reconnected with here on Facebook; I identified him as who he represented himself as because he led with something only the two of us knew. But his profile and history were empty, so I didn’t really know who he is now or his story over the last decades.

     After a few exchanges of conversation he wrote a misogynist hate speech comment about a female who I had reposted as a hero in calling out Trump. My immediate reply was, this is where we part company. So why am I writing about this in reference to this article? Because hate speech precedes, normalizes, enables, valorizes and legitimates hate crimes.

     The guy who calls a woman a term intended to minimize her power will one day kill if unchecked. Silence is complicity, and failing to call someone on their behavior grants permission. Every teacher and parent knows this is how you create rules about what is allowed, by failing to consequent a behavior you do not wish to be repeated. We must do this as friends also; run limit setting therapy, deauthorize hate, and disengage when from contact when necessary to remain safe or avoid rewarding acts we cannot permit or be associated with.

      Hate speech, which seeks to harm a class of persons, is the only exception to the right of free speech as parrhesia, the sacred calling to expose injustice, and the independence of journalism as a sacred calling to seek the truth, for hate speech dehumanizes others as a criminal theft of citizenship and identity which violates our ideals of equality and liberty; hate speech is an act of tyranny and terror which is subversive to democracy as a free society of equals..

     To make an idea about a kind of people is an act of violence.

     Hate speech is a red line, and has no place in open debate or the free market and exchange of ideas. It is an attempt to subjugate both its targets and those it claims to speak for as a primary strategy of fascism, and it is an instrument of othering.

      In this case it was sexual in nature, but this is also true generally as a tool of systems of oppression. And it gets worse from there, as disempowerment and dehumanization becomes abuse and in its terminal form femicide.

       This is where misogyny leads; as written by Arwa Mahdawi in The Guardian, in an article entitled The livestreamed killing of an influencer could be femicide – a misunderstood crisis: Much remains uncertain about Valeria Márquez’s death. But it shines a light on a universal issue; “Valeria Márquez was killed in one of the most horrifically public ways possible. On Tuesday evening, the 23-year-old Mexican social media influencer, who had built up a large following with videos about beauty and makeup, was recording a TikTok livestream in the beauty salon where she worked in Jalisco, a state in west-central Mexico. A man entered the establishment and, with her video still running, shot her dead.

     Many details of the case are still unclear. However, Márquez’s death is being investigated as a femicide, according to a statement by the Jalisco state prosecutor.

     Femicide is defined as the intentional killing of a woman or girl with gender-related motivations. (The term for killing males because of their sex, something that has occurred during war and genocide, is androcide.)

   While femicide is a universal and age-old issue, it is poorly understood. It is also sometimes willfully misunderstood by some men’s rights activists, who like to argue that it is a nonexistent problem because men make up the majority of victims (and perpetrators) of homicide. So it’s worth spelling out the parameters of femicide. If a woman is killed in a robbery gone wrong, that’s (probably) not femicide. If she is killed by an ex-boyfriend who views women as the property of men rather than autonomous human beings, that’s femicide. “Honour”-related killings are also obviously femicide.

     We are missing a lot of data on femicide. “Too many victims of femicide still go uncounted: for roughly four in 10 intentional murders of women and girls, there is not enough information to identify them as gender-related killings because of national variation in criminal justice recording and investigation practices,” UN Women wrote in a report last year.

     Naming the problem – understanding why femicide is different from homicide – is important, because it helps us solve it. If more institutions took misogyny and domestic violence seriously, we’d see fewer dead women. A report by the World Health Organization notes, for example, that “stronger gun laws related to men previously cited for or convicted of intimate partner abuse are of particular importance in reducing rates of femicide”.

     Justice for Márquez doesn’t just involve finding her killer and ensuring they are punished. If this was femicide, it means being very clear about the misogyny that led to her death. It means holding all the lawmakers and institutions that perpetuate this misogyny to account. Justice means understanding that her death wasn’t some sort of tragic one-off, but part of a far larger problem.

     “If I die, I want a loud death,” the Palestinian photojournalist Fatima Hassouna wrote on social media shortly before she was killed by an Israeli airstrike this year. “I don’t want to be just breaking news, or a number in a group, I want a death that the world will hear, an impact that will remain through time … ”

     That quote has haunted me ever since I read it. So many women who die premature and violent deaths die quiet deaths. They become statistics. Márquez must not just become another femicide statistic. Let her death, which has shone a spotlight on femicide, be loud. Let it have an impact that will remain through time.”

      Go not quietly, friends.

     This is an endemic and pervasive problem in Mexico, Latin America, and other patriarchal cultures because it is a design feature of patriarchy and a benefit to its apex predators as immunity for crimes against women; this is the purpose of unequal power, to create and enforce elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege.

      So the murder of a woman to steal her power is sadly far from unique, though the livestreamed murder of a beauty influencer is certainly shocking and horrific.

      But neither is resistance and the solidarity of women in liberation struggle against patriarchy as a system of oppression unique.

      As I wrote in my post of November 26 2019, Song of the Revolution: the performance of Chilean women protesting rape culture and the patriarchy encompasses Latin America; In a courageous performance of solidarity and defiance of authority, Chilean women have created a viral Song of the Revolution in a street theatre of sung and danced protest, A Rapist in Your Path, which references the atrocities and sexual terror of the Chilean police and government both now and under Pinochet, but also challenges rape culture and the Patriarchy and as such has rapidly spread across Latin America and the world.

     Maybe the Girl Scouts should offer merit badges in close quarters combat and small unit tactics.

     As Charis McGowan writes in The Guardian, “The song was written by Lastesis, a feminist theatre group based in the city of Valparaíso, who credited Chile’s women protesters for helping spread the work around the world.”

     The group’s members are “Paula Cometa”, “Sibila Sotomayor, Daffne Valdés, and Lea Cáceres.”

    “A Rapist in Your Path is based on the work of the Argentinian theorist Rita Segato, who argues that sexual violence is a political problem, not a moral one.”

    “The lyrics describe how institutions – the police, the judiciary and political power structures – uphold systematic violations of women’s rights: “The rapist is you/ It’s the cops/ The judges/ The state/ The president.”

    “Another section repudiates the many ways that women are blamed for falling victim to sexual violence (“And it’s not my fault / nor where I was / nor what I wore”) before concluding: “The rapist is you.”

     As I wrote in my post of June 2 2024, Victory Mexico: In Celebration of President Claudia Sheinbaum; We celebrate victory for the people of Mexico in the election of her new President Claudia Sheinbaum. This is historic both for Mexico and the world; in the heart of patriarchal darkness and the psychopathy of macho violence as a system of control and oppression, her people have elected a woman. If Mexico can do this for herself, what can all of us together do in solidarity and liberation struggle?

     Mexico is now a world leader in human rights and gender equality. Though her predecessor was admirable and a man of great heart and vision.

     How does one balance two truths which contradict each other?

     First I wish to offer eulogy for the historic Presidency of AMLO, who with all of his very human flaws remains a man who placed his life in the balance with those of the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, all whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth, and whose legacy includes the restoration of the Revolution in Mexico.

     A thousand Trumps cannot equal him; my hope for our common future is that Mexico herself will live up to his example.

     Truth is in the details, to paraphrase the idiom which originated with  Gustave Flaubert as “Le bon Dieu est dans le détail”, and herein my next step in the problematization of this event is to contextualize it in terms of the history of Mexico and what Rita Segato called “the colonialization of power” as an imposed condition of revolutionary struggle.

     As I wrote in my post of November 21 2020, Hope and Struggle: Mexico;

 Yesterday we celebrated the one hundred tenth anniversary of the Mexican Revolution; I cooked Oaxacan cuisine, a vestigial skill of my adventures as an ally of the Zapatista Revolt in the mid 1990’s, and there was music and dancing, if only that of my partner Theresa and myself under the glittering stars of our mountain home.

     It has also been two years since the great reformer AMLO was elected President of Mexico as a figure of our hope for the future, one of many successive waves of revolutionary struggle to engulf the nation in the century and more since the Revolution of 1910, and it is to the historical dialectics of hope and struggle that my thoughts now turn.

     Claudio Lomnitz has charted the course of that history in his brilliant article in Jacobin, The Mexican Revolution Is Not Dead; “The Mexican Revolution erupted 110 years ago today, as ordinary Mexicans rebelled against despotism and inequality. Before it was over, the country’s agrarian oligarchy had been destroyed.

     The Mexican Revolution began 110 years ago, in response to a formal invitation. It then slowly unfurled into an uncontrollable mess. Its leader, the gentlemanly Francisco Madero, issued the summons in his Plan de San Luis: “On November 20, from 6 p.m. on, all citizens of the Republic shall take up arms to overthrow the authorities that currently govern us.”

     “Mr and Mrs Madero kindly request your distinguished presence for the initiation of the Mexican Revolution; please RSVP at your local Anti-Reelection Committee,” it may well have read.

     Except that rather than summoning a much-hoped-for, oh-so-civil civil society, Madero’s call was answered by a cast of characters that has contributed to making Hollywood a more diverse kind of place: bandit heroes like Pancho Villa; a villanous coup-plotting gringo ambassador; and Francisco Madero himself, who received his marching orders at séances, from the spirit of his long-departed little brother, Raúl. And then there was also the arch-traitor, alcoholic and second Indian president of Mexico, General Victoriano Huerta, who had his boss, the mild-mannered Madero, killed; and the ancient patriarch general Porfirio Díaz, who had the folly of seeking reelection for the eigth time (when is enough enough?). The list still goes on and on . . . peasant leaders like Emiliano Zapata; wily schemers like Venustiano Carranza . . . All locked in a fight to survive, or to kill one another off — for, like Chronos, the Mexican Revolution devoured all of its children.

     The Revolution put Mexico’s contradictions on display, for all the world to see. It was a modern war, but unlike the First World War, with which it was contemporaneous, the Mexican Revolution’s modernity sometimes let off a cheap, secondhand aroma. Its most prized gun was not the Krupp’s astonishing “Big Bertha,” but rather the “carabina .30-30” of lore. These guns were purchased from the US Army’s stock of leftovers from the Spanish-American War of 1898. Still, knockoffs and all, the Mexican Revolution was a modern war, yet it served to upend the painstakingly cultivated image of modernity that had been nursed during thirty years of dictatorship (the “Porfiriato”). The positivist dream of Mexican evolution was shattered by crowds of sombreroed peasants, and soldadera women, wrapped in their rebozos atop the transport trains, slapping tortillas, and sleeping or fighting with the soldiers. From a symbolic point of view, the Mexican Revolution was the world’s biggest jacquerie.”

     “On the other hand, thanks to widespread agrarian reform, the Mexican Revolution successfully destroyed Mexico’s agrarian oligarchy, and it was the first country to nationalize its oil industry. The Revolution also destroyed the old Federal Army, and so Mexico became one of the rare Latin American countries not to have military coups in the twentieth century. These and other major accomplishments have generated hesitations regarding what history’s veredict on the twentieth century’s first social revolution should be.

     Even so, by the 1960s, many intellectuals were saying that the revolution was dead. It seemed to be dead, in any case, but then the neoliberal reforms of the 1980s brought it back to life. Privatization, democratic reform, and state shrinkage allowed the revolution to migrate from the state to the opposition, a process that culminated in 1988, with the annnointment of Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, son of Lázaro Cárdenas, and former PRI governor as its candidate for the presidency. Along with Cárdenas, Zapata, Villa, and the rest of the revolutionary pantheon migrated to one opposition or another. Thus, in 1994, an indigenous rebellion rocked the southern state of Chiapas, and it took up Zapata’s name and cause. The Zapatistas also revived the symbolic topography of the revolution and made it their own.

     More recently, Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s Movimiento de Renovación Nacional (“MORENA,” which is now a political party) named its newspaper Regeneración, after Flores Magón’s famous journal, while AMLO has been at pains to identify neoliberalism with the Porfiriato, and himself with Franciso Madero.

     The Mexican Revolution, then, is not dead. But is it alive? That’s harder to say, because it has died and been revived several times, often lingering as a ghost. Maybe this is because, despite its many sinister and farcical elements, the Mexican Revolution was, in the end, tragic — a concatenation of events that was bigger even than its heroes and villains. For this reason, it still occasionally offers models for contestation and self-fashioning, much as the French Revolution once did.”

     Which brings us up to the present moment, with AMLO beset with enemies, enemies in the guise of friends like America and the plutocratic elites whose wealth rests on the de facto slavery of illegal migrant labor and weaponized disparity and racism, and allies with questionable motives who are unreliable, like a majestic lion surrounded by ravenous hyenas.

     As written by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador himself in the essay Privatization Is Theft, from the book A New Hope for Mexico published in the year of his election as President; “In terms of our collective wellbeing, the politics of pillage has been an unmitigated disaster. In economic and social affairs, we’ve been regressing instead of moving forward. But this is hardly surprising: the model itself is designed to favor a small minority of corrupt politicians and white-collar criminals. The model does not seek to meet the needs of the people, or to avoid violence and conflict; it seeks neither to govern openly nor honestly. It seeks to monopolize the bureaucratic apparatus and transfer public goods to private hands, making claims that this will somehow bring about prosperity.

     The result: monstrous economic and social inequality. Mexico is one of the countries with the greatest disparities between wealth and poverty in the world. According to a 2015 article written by Gerardo Esquivel, a professor at the College of Mexico and a Harvard graduate, 10 percent of Mexicans control 64.4 percent of the national income, and 1 percent own 21 percent of the country’s wealth. But most significantly, inequality in Mexico deepened precisely during the neoliberal period. Privatization allowed it to thrive.

     It’s also important to make note of the following statistic: in July 1988, when Carlos Salinas was imposed as president on the Mexican people through electoral fraud, only one Mexican family sat on the Forbes list of the world’s richest people — the Garza Sada family, with $2 billion to their name. By the end of Salinas’s term in office, twenty-four Mexicans had joined the list, owning a combined total of $44.1 billion. Nearly all had made off with companies, mines, and banks belonging to the people of Mexico. In 1988, Mexico sat at twenty-sixth place on a list of countries with the most billionaires; by 1994, Mexico was in fourth place, just beneath the United States, Japan, and Germany.

     As is readily observed, economic inequality today is greater than it was in the 1980s, and perhaps greater than the periods before, though a lack of accurate records makes such comparisons difficult. Although Esquivel doesn’t highlight it, inequality skyrocketed during Salinas’s term, when the transfer of public goods to private hands was at its most intense. Under Salinas, the divide between rich and poor deepened like never before. Salinas is the godfather of modern inequality in Mexico.

     It’s clear, then, that privatization is not the panacea that its proponents would have us believe. If it were, beneficial effects would by now be visible. At this juncture it’s fair to ask neoliberalism’s supporters: how have Mexicans benefited from the privatization of the telecommunications system? Is it a mere coincidence that, in terms of price and quality, both phone and internet service in Mexico rank seventieth worldwide, far below other members of the OECD?

     What social benefits has the media monopoly conferred — other than to its direct beneficiaries, who have amassed tremendous wealth in exchange for protecting the corrupt regime, through brazenly slanted coverage of opposition candidates? What have we gained through the privatization of [Mexican state railroad company] Ferrocarriles Nacionales in 1995, if twenty-plus years later these outside investors haven’t built new train lines, and can charge whatever they want for transport?

     How have we benefited from the leasing out of 240 million acres, 40 percent of the country (Mexico has 482 million acres total) for the extraction of gold, silver, and copper? Mexican miners earn, on average, sixteen times less than those in the United States and Canada. Companies in this field have extracted in five short years as much gold and silver as the Spanish Empire took in three centuries. Most outrageously, up until recently they were extracting these minerals untaxed. In short, we are living through the greatest pillage of natural resources in Mexico’s history.

     This destructive policy has done nothing for the country. Statistics show that in the past thirty years we’ve failed to advance. To the contrary, in terms of economic growth we’ve fallen behind even an impoverished country like Haiti. The only constant has been economic stagnation and unemployment, which has forced millions of Mexicans to migrate or to make a living through the informal economy, if not resorting to crime. Half of the population is precariously employed with no safety net.

     The widespread abandonment of agriculture, lack of job or educational prospects for our youth, and spiraling unemployment has resulted in insecurity and violence that have taken millions of lives. In the magazine Mundo Ejecutivo, Alejandro Desfassiaux reports that “the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) and the National Registry of Disappeared or Lost Persons (RNPED) reported over 175,000 homicides and 26,798 instances of missing people between 2006–2015.” As Desfassiaux puts it, “this violence affected countless others when family members are included.”

     For these reasons, it’s illogical to think we can end corruption through the same neoliberal political and economic approach that has so patently failed in the past. To the contrary, until there’s a deep and sustained change, Mexico will continue its decline. Our present course is unsustainable, and we are nearing the point of complete collapse.

     Our political economy today echoes the failures of the Porfiriato period at the end of the nineteenth century, when the prosperity of a few was placed above the needs of the many. That failed experiment culminated in armed revolution. The need to topple the PRIAN oligarchy and their ilk has never been greater, just as happened with Porfirio Díaz. But this time around we will not descend into violence, acting rather through a revolution of conscience, through an awakening and an organization of the pueblo to rid Mexico of the corruption that consumes it.

     In short: instead of the neoliberal agenda, which consists of the appropriation for the few, we must create a new consensus that prioritizes honesty as a way of living and governing, and regains the great material, social, and moral wealth that was once Mexico’s. We should never forget the words of José María Morelos two hundred years ago: “Alleviate both indigency and extravagance.”

    We must ensure that the democratic state, through legal means, distributes Mexico’s wealth equitably, subject to the premise that equal treatment cannot exist without equal access, and that justice consists of giving more to he or she who has less.”

     Next I turn to our future, and as we emerge from the legacies of our history I say now what I once said to the wife of a poetry professor in regard to the great classics of literature and their authors; There are those who must be kept and those from whom we must escape, and if we are very lucky they are not always the same. Anne Rice that was, who used the idea of Those Who Must Be Kept in her novels and modeled her character of Mael on myself.

     As I wrote in my post of March 9 2020, Three Stories of the Woman’s Day March in Mexico Which Became a Revolt: Defiance, Seizure of Power, and Victory; Eighty thousand women in Mexico City marched against femicide and gender based violence this Sunday in a triumphant reprise of the Valentines Day march which was met with police repression, this time overwhelming the police sent to club them into submission in a stunning victory over patriarchal state terror. But this is not the story here.

     Demonstrations on International Woman’s Day and a following 24 hour Day Without a Woman strike Monday, echoes of Aristophanes’ Lysistrata thundering across the centuries like a lightning strike, erupted into revolt as tens of thousands of women stormed the Presidential Palace and firebombed it with molotov cocktails, demanding that Amlo break his wall of silence and listen to their calls for government action to end the killings and transform the culture of patriarchy and toxic masculinity which has plunged the nation into a cauldron of death and sexual terror. This is almost the story, the one we must tell future generations of this day.

     No, the story here is just this; ten women are murdered each day in Mexico, victims of a patriarchy which has until now run unchecked and without accountability. And this the women of Mexico will tolerate no more, and are holding their government responsible for their lives.

     So I wrote four years ago, as the anti femicide and violence against women riots seized Mexico and brought it to a standstill for a crucial moment, and though patriarchy as a system of oppression is as ancient as what we call civilization and as powerful as any other tyranny with the authorization of theocracy, and is also the among the most pervasive of multigenerational criminal conspiracies, the women of Mexico broke the wall of silence and began a great reckoning for a moral disease older than the Hanging of the Maids in Homer’s Ulysses.

     In President Claudia Sheinbaum, the women of Mexico have a champion let us rejoice and celebrate this seizure of power, and also stand in solidarity to bring change to the Patriarchy for all humankind.

     For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.

Performance colectivo Las Tesis “Un violador en tu camino”

The War Against Women, Rita Segato

A New Hope for Mexico: Saying No to Corruption, Violence, and Trump’s Wall,

Andrés Manuel López Obrador

The livestreamed killing of an influencer could be femicide – a misunderstood crisis, Arwa Mahdawi

Mexican beauty influencer shot dead during TikTok live stream

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/14/mexican-beauty-influencer-killed-tiktok

Murder of Colombian model sparks outrage over rising femicides

Trump is using his assault on government to retaliate against women

Judith Levine

‘The only healing will be through justice’: Pulitzer winner Cristina Rivera Garza on femicide in Mexico

https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/may/14/pulitzer-winner-cristina-rivera-garza-femicide-in-mexico-lilianas-invincible-summer

Liliana’s Invincible Summer: A Sister’s Search for Justice, Cristina Rivera Garza

The Penelopiad, Margaret Atwood

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17645.The_Penelopiad?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_10

Lysistrata, Aristophanes

‘Femicide nation’: murder of young woman casts spotlight on Mexico’s gender violence crisis

‘Nowhere is safe’: Colombia confronts alarming surge in femicides

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/hell-women-mexico-women-strike-march-against-gender-killings-sexual-n1153081

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/14/mexico-femicide-protest-ingrid-escamilla

March 15 2025 Women’s History Month: Feminism as Revolutionary Struggle and a Reimagination of Humankind and our Historical Civilization
https://torchofliberty.home.blog/2025/03/15/march-15-2025-womens-history-month-feminism-as-revolutionary-struggle-and-a-reimagination-of-humankind-and-our-historical-civilization/

May 19 2025 Beauty and Ugliness, Horror and Wonder, and the Limits of the Human: Case of the Kristi Noem Television Commerical For Homeland Security’s White Supremacist Terror

      We are surprised now and again with the unlooked for juxtaposition of the beautiful, the ugly, and the strange, like a fiery chili heart in a Mexican candy on the side of wonderful surprises, or on the side of horrible surprises reaching out to hold a frightened comrade’s hand as the world shatters under artillery fire to discover its just the hand that’s left.

      Yemen that last was, as Trump ordered the bombardment of our positions in the counter blockade of Israel’s blockade of humanitarian aid to Palestine on March 19, exactly as had Biden last year. Tyranny has traded masks in our elections, but the abandonment of our principle of universal human rights has not changed, if it was ever true.

      Ansar Allah’s glorious Resistance to our dehumanization and the depravity of an America which would buy the deaths of children with our taxes and conspire with Israel in the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestine in order to build a Riviera of casinos on their bones as Trump and Netanyahu together plot are become a chiaroscuro which defines us all, and the limits of the human.

      I wish I could say that all things are equal to me in this regard, horror and wonder, ugliness and beauty, but its not true, or true only in moments when I am Most Sincerely Dead and my consciousness is free from the limits of our form.

      For all that I have lived in this vast wilderness of unknowns, beyond the boundaries of the Forbidden and the limits of the human, through Rashomon Gate Events which destroy and create universes and possibilities of becoming human and fracture time like a Hobgoblin’s Broken Mirror, how little have I escaped the legacies of our history and the flags of my skin.

      But the suffering of others remains greater than my own, and our duty of care for others compels me to do what I can to help, even when it is meaningless, when it is impossible, when it can change nothing. In the end this is what defines our humanity, and it is the greatest power in the universe.

      Ours is an Absurd universe, and one wherein two contradictory things can both be true, in which the terror of our nothingness is balanced with the joy of total freedom.

      While watching Benedict Cumberbatch’s beautiful Dr Strange on television, my partner Dolly and I were confronted serially by a loathsome box of evils in Kristi Noem’s advertisement for white supremacist state terror and ethnic cleansing now ongoing by the Department of Homeland Security she commands.

      Her plastic mouth simulates human speech like a possessed Barbie doll, made of lies disguised as truths, diabolisms as virtues, an artificial and illusory beauty of surfaces which masks horrors like the justifications of our concentration camps for nonwhite people and political dissidents as security.

     Security is an illusion, law serves power, order is theft, and there is no just Authority.

      And really, Kristi, you’re as dark as some Mexicans and you poisoned your lips with botox to make them look like a black girl’s in the hope that you may deceive men into thinking them yummy, and you are leading the ethnic cleansing of America through your secret armies of police white supremacist terror? Is this because you think they will come for you last?

      No one controls such forces, once they are set in motion.

      Beneath the human mask of those who would enslave us and steal our souls, including all Republicans and any who voted for our Rapist In Chief, Nazi revivalist, and Russian agent Traitor Trump and his Theatre of Cruelty with all of his freaks and degenerate subhuman monstrosities of his regime of systems of oppression including theocratic patriarchal sexual terror, white supremacist terror, and amoral nihilistic capitalism in the grand strategic trinity of predation designed to transform us from persons to things that can be owned and fed as raw material into the machine of elite wealth and power and from citizens to subjects through processes of falsification, commodification, and dehumanization; beneath all of this lies the depravities and perversions of endless chasms of darkness, full of crawling things.

      This is why the stench of putrefaction trails Kristi Noem and all minions of Our Clown of Terror, slaves of Moloch the Seducer and Demon of Lies, and wafts a poisonous sweet candy scent into the labyrinth of the Wilderness of Mirrors with its endless echoes and reflections of propaganda, conspiracy theories, lies and illusions, bizarro worlds and reversals of meaning, and alternate realities which trap the unwary with their siren songs; for all such apologists of tyranny and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil are zombified and hollowed out.

       To be a Republican is to be like the Man of Worms in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer two part episode Whats My Line?, or Oogy Boogy Man in The Nightmare Before Christmas; a husk of human flesh utterly consumed by its own darkness and worn like a sock puppet by the horrors that possess it.

      And remember, folks, you can always tell a Republican’s secret name; its their act of treason plus their sex crime.

My Bugs! Oogy Boogey Unravels, Nightmare Before Christmas

the Man of Worms in Buffy the Vampire Slayer two part episode Whats My Line?

Season 2 episode 9

“To establish a global order based on justice for all the peoples of the world”

Senior Ansar Allah official on why Yemen fights for Gaza

March 5 2025 Trump Is An Illusion Made Of Lies, But How Is He Constructed and How Can He Be Unmade? Case of Trump’s Address to Congress

March 19 2025 Tyrants Attack In Campaign Of Genocide: Netanyahu Bombs Civilian Aid Corridor In Gaza To Divide It Into Bantustans As Trump Bombs Yemen To Break Our Counter Blockade of the Israeli Blockade of Humanitarian Aid

January 12 2024 Victorious Red Sea Campaign Globalizes the Gaza War

January 29 2024 Where Do We Go From Here? As the Gaza War Becomes A Great Powers Proxy War and a Theatre of World War Three, and the Arab-American Alliance With Our Colony Israel Versus the Iranian Dominion of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen With Their Key Ally Russia Make A Wishbone of the Holy Land

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness – Official Final Trailer

May 18 2025 Victory Over Fascism In European Elections: Poland, Romania, and Portugal Choose Democracy

      We celebrate today victories of democracy over fascism in Europe’s elections today; in Poland, crucial first line of defense against Russia’s conquest of Europe and safe haven for the Russian resistance to Putin and for the international community fighting for Ukraine beyond her boundaries, in Romania which is the gateway to the whole Danube region of central Europe from the Black Sea and her port of Constantia a stone’s throw from Odesa in Ukraine and bars the Russian invasion of Europe through that route, and in Portugal, unique in history as having liberated here own empire after the great triumph of Socialism decades ago.

     Narrow victories they are, in a gathering storm of fascism and identitarian nationalism which threatens to engulf Europe, but victories still, and one which prove that we are not defeated yet, and hope remains for a free society of equals.

      As written by Sam Jones in Madrid, Jon Henley in Bucharest, and Jakub Krupa in Warsaw in The Guardian, in an article entitled Runoffs, reruns and rightwingers: Europe’s electoral ‘super Sunday’ explained; “Millions of voters in Romania, Poland and Portugal are casting their ballots in an electoral “super Sunday” that will determine the course of their democracies at a time of heightened political, commercial and economic tensions.

     In Romania, the far-right candidate is the frontrunner in a presidential runoff, while in a deeply polarised Poland’s first-round vote, a liberal, a conservative and a far-right candidate are vying to become president.

     In Portugal, which is holding a snap legislative election just 14 months after the last vote, the status quo looks set to continue. Here’s what you need to know.

     Hasn’t Romania already had a presidential election?

    Yes. The original vote last year was annulled and its shock far-right winner disbarred amid widespread concerns over Russian interference and other irregularities. So the vote on Sunday is the second round of the second presidential election in six months.

     This time an ultranationalist, EU-critical Trump admirer is in a run-off against a centrist independent in a vote that analysts have called the most important in the country’s post-communist history.

     George Simion, 38, who sports Maga caps, promotes a socially conservative agenda and wants the “Melonisation” of Europe and to halt military aid to Ukraine, won the first round comfortably with 41% of the vote, nearly double the score of his rival.

     The second-placed Nicușor Dan, the 55-year-old mayor of Bucharest, has cast the runoff as a fight between “a pro-western and an anti-western direction for Romania”. Polls show the gap between the two narrowing, with one putting them neck and neck.

     Riding a wave of voter frustration with Romania’s mainstream parties, Simion has promised, if he wins, to appoint as prime minister Călin Georgescu, the winner of last November’s cancelled vote.

     The first-round defeat of the ruling Social Democrat-Liberal coalition’s candidate triggered the resignation of the pro-European prime minister, Marcel Ciolacu, and the de facto collapse of the government. A new coalition must now be formed.

    Analysts have said a Simion victory could lead to the country swinging sharply to the right. A confidence-and-supply deal between Simion’s AUR party, the second largest in parliament, and Coalacu’s Social Democrats is seen as a post-vote possibility, as are snap elections.

     The ballot is being closely watched by the EU, which could do without another disruptor in the region alongside Hungary and Slovakia. Also interested are nationalists – including in Washington – who accused Bucharest of trampling on democracy after the original vote was cancelled and Georgescu barred from standing in the rerun.

     Romania’s president has a semi-executive role with considerable powers over foreign policy, national security, defence spending and judicial appointments. They also represent the country, a Nato member, on the international stage and can veto important EU votes.

     Sounds pretty high-stakes. How about in Poland?

     Also high-stakes, certainly, at least, for Donald Tusk’s government. Sunday’s vote will narrow down the list of contenders to be the country’s next president, a role that carries some influence over foreign and defence policy, as well as robust powers to veto legislation passed by parliament.

     Since 2023, the country has been governed by Tusk’s Civic Coalition, an ideologically diverse and politically fragile alliance of pro-democratic parties. Its central promise has been to reverse the controversial and expansive changes pursued during the eight years of rule by the national-populist Law and Justice (PiS) party.

     But the government’s ability to deliver on these promises remained hampered by the veto power vested in the president, a position held since 2015 by Andrzej Duda, a close political ally of the ousted administration and a firm supporter of Donald Trump.

     Winning the presidential race would consolidate the government’s position and could help it fulfil some of its liberal promises on social issues such as abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.

     Having consistently led the polls, Rafał Trzaskowski, the 53-year-old centrist mayor of Warsaw and a senior member of the Civic Coalition, is the candidate to beat.

     His main rival is a 42-year-old conservative, Karol Nawrocki, who is formally independent but endorsed by PiS. The previously little-known historian hopes to offer a fresh face and a break with the populist-right government’s polarising legacy while sticking to its core messages on sovereignty, illegal migration and frustration with green policies.

     Trzaskowski and Nawrocki are almost certain to win the top two positions and go through to a runoff on 1 June.

     Sławomir Mentzen, 38, a leader of the far-right Confederation party, is the outside candidate, who briefly challenged Nawrocki for second place but has faded over the past month.

     Presenting himself as a spokesperson for a younger generation disenchanted with mainstream politics, he campaigns on a ticket of radical deregulation and tax cuts. An outspoken critic of the EU and opponent of liberalising migration, LGBTQ rightsand abortion laws, he is believed to be positioning himself for the 2027 parliamentary elections.

     What about in Portugal?

     This one is expected to bring fewer fireworks. Portugal is heading to the polls for its third snap general election in three years. The centre-right prime minister, Luís Montenegro, triggered Sunday’s vote in response to growing questions over his family’s business activities.

     Montenegro, the leader of the Democratic Alliance (AD) platform that has governed Portugal since its narrow victory in last year’s election, has come under growing scrutiny relating to a data protection consultancy that he founded in 2021 and which he transferred to his wife and sons the following year.

     Faced with questions over possible conflicts of interest, Montenegro – who has denied any wrongdoing or ethical breaches – staged a confidence vote in his administration in March, saying he wanted“to end the atmosphere of permanent insinuations and intrigues”. But he lost the vote and a fresh election was called.

     Recent polls suggest a similar result to last time, putting the AD on about 33%, the opposition Socialist party (PS) on 26% and the far-right Chega party on 17%.

     Montenegro appears likely to once again fall short of a majority – even if he strikes a deal with the small Liberal Initiative party, which is polling at about 6% – and will struggle to govern, especially if the PS makes good on its threats to oppose his legislative agenda.

     Although Montenegro has maintained his blanket ban on any deals with Chega, his government has been accused of pandering to the far right after it announced the expulsion of 18,000 irregular migrants during the election campaign. There has also been speculation that Montenegro’s own Social Democratic party could replace him with someone more amenable to working with Chega should he fail to deliver on Sunday.

     Last time round, the AD won 80 seats to the PS’s 78, while Chega, which is led by the former TV football pundit André Ventura, enjoyed a surge in support and increased its seat count from 12 to 50.”  

Centrist Warsaw mayor narrowly ahead in first round of Polish presidential race

Centrist Nicuşor Dan defeats far-right rival in Romanian presidential election

 Centre-right party wins Portuguese election as far right makes record gains

 Runoffs, reruns and rightwingers: Europe’s electoral ‘super Sunday’ explained

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/14/runoffs-reruns-and-rightwingers-europe-prepares-for-electoral-super-sunday?fbclid=IwY2xjawKYSANleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFqRXRORzFUdnNibU9vWkR5AR4RCp-FvMykyI6LEAJjm7v9UVdB1FHo4i4a8_SXqh6CvUguFMWewOdqCInbdQ_aem_MoFGK8OALzjIqf4jDRPbrQ

                A History of Fascism In European Elections Since 2022

June 10 2024 Fascism Begins the Capture of Europe in Her Elections

January 21 2024 In Germany And Throughout Europe, the Return of Fascism Creates Its Own Resistance As Polarization Begins the Fracture of the State

July 19 2024 Victory Britain: In the Electoral Triumph of Labour Over the Tories, Of Love Over Hate and of Hope Over Fear, Britain Reclaims Her Heart

July 7 2024 Victory France!

February 22 2025 Will the Tide of Fascism Break Or Swallow Us All?: Case of the German Elections

October 4 2024 Austria Falls As Nazi Revivalism Seizes Europe

October 23 2023 Victory Poland Turns the Tide of Fascism in Europe

July 22 2023 The Ghosts of Our Possible Futures; In Spain’s Elections, Democracy and Fascism Play For the Soul of Europe

March 16 2025 Serbia Resists Capture of the State by Putin’s Puppet Tyrant; Why Can’t We Here In America?

September 25 2022 Italy Chooses a Future Under the Shadows of Fascist Terror and Tyranny

November 26 2023 Like the Spreading Tracks of Leprosy, the Netherlands Choose Fascism

May 17 2025 Breaking the Silence, For Only Love Conquers Fear: International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia

     On this day we celebrate Breaking the Silence, described on their website as “stories of hope, fear, loss and courage”.  Of this I shall merely amplify the voices immortalized in this space, for I am not a member of this community and cannot speak for them nor from within the lived experience of this history; my prefacing statement here is but a general observation.

      Our universal human rights are anchored by two which define what is human; our rights of self ownership of identity and of bodily autonomy. So also with those rights we possess as citizens of a free society of equals, which are parallel and interdependent with those derived from our natural condition, for there is no right of life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness without our rights to choose who we are and may become and to perform our chosen identities as we prefer.

     Let us frighten the horses and perform our identities as a community of brothers, sisters, and others in a free society of equals, including all possibilities of human being as yet undreamed, which raises each other up and opens all doors to the future of our own best selves.

     As I wrote in my post of June 23 2024, Masquerade: Identities of Sex and Gender as History and Performance; A friend has written a brilliant, insightful, and very emotionally charged essay on the subject of queer identity, finding ones tribe, and being ostracized by ones role models due to the fracture and balkanization of identities of sex and gender in queer culture. To be a Painted Bird is a tragedy on the scale of a private Holocaust, and some of this seems to me to be a result of increasing specialization and siloing of LGBT subcultures, and also a shocking failure of solidarity. If those who are marginalized by normative society do not stand united, surely they will become vulnerable to silencing and erasure.

      I am not a member of this community, and can not speak from within this space, nor have I much studied what seem to be a highly diverse, nuanced, intentionally baffling and obscure as in-group coding, misdirection, and confusion, and complex set of authorized identities within the community of outlaws of sex and gender, so am utterly clueless about how such representations and choices are negotiated. I suspect this is true for many potential allies who would stand with any human who stands alone, but may not know how to do so, or recognize when someone is in pain.

     Sadly, it may be also be true for those whose awareness of desire, sexual orientation, and identities of sex and gender are emerging or in transformative processes of change, and who may feel confusion, ambiguity, and dislocation not as freedom and joy but as crisis and trauma, especially those who become aware of differences and chasms of meaning between themselves and others, and must cope with authorized identities of sex and gender as systems of oppression which manifest as isolation and disconnectedness at best and as shaming, dehumanization, and persecution at worst as consequences of negotiating identities in a social context of judgement, ridicule, and massively unequal power.

      The universal human struggle for autonomy here collides disastrously with authorized identities and a Theocratic-Patriarchal Gideonite value system which reinforces heteronormative narratives as submission to authority, in parallel with the need for belonging and membership in the quest to find a tribe within a society riven with hierarchies of exclusionary otherness, wherein our negotiations between self and others are mediated by elite hegemonic forces of dominion, whose lies and illusions, like a wilderness of funhouse mirrors, can falsify and steal our souls.  

     The awakening to total freedom as a self created being can be both wonderful and terrible. How do we safeguard that freedom? What does our duty of care for each other require of us as mentors and stewards for each other’s limitless possibilities of becoming human?

     We also have a need for another kind of work, one whose intention is to provide guidance in finding ones tribe among the full spectrum of multilayered and wonderfully diverse smorgasboard of choices available in our society now, chess pieces in a great game of human being, meaning, and value, and reveals and opens the limitless possibilities of becoming human and discovering communities of wellbeing and mutual aid which can foster such a journey of introspection for the young and curious, without authorizing a prescriptive set of identities.

     Identity is not a static frame into which one must fit oneself regardless of our pluralities; we are all pluralities, we are all in processes of change and growth, and our nature, to paraphrase Freud’s delightfully wicked phrase “polymorphously perverse”, obeys but one law; anything goes.

      Are we not both Harley Quinn and the Joker, bound together in one flesh?

      Does the range of choices act as an intrinsic limit on autonomy? If so the task of becoming human involves chaos, disruption, reimagination, and transformation, as I believe; the violation of normalities and transgression of boundaries of the Forbidden to free us of the tyranny of other people’s ideas of virtue and of authorized identities, to create limitless possibilities of becoming human as seizures of power.

     Order appropriates; Chaos autonomizes. As Guillermo del Toro wrote in Carnival Row; Chaos is the great hope of the powerless.      

    Audubon publishes a wonderful field guide to birds, which usefully describes their glorious and beautiful differences and uniqueness without suggesting it is better to be a falcon than a dove; each have a niche in the system of life, as do we all. We need a version for humans; Queer Tribes, and How to Find Yours.

     This raises the question of how we discover who we want to become. If I were designing an instrument for this purpose in terms of sexual orientation, I would base the process not on prescriptive authorization of identities like the Sorting Hat in Harry Potter, which involves both submission to authority and overdetermination as a limiting factor, and also tends to lock one in to rigid and unchanging categories of being, but on descriptive taxonomy and a tool with which I am very familiar, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, which could easily be modified for the discovery of identities of sex and gender.  

     Our masquerade of identities of sex and gender as culture, ethnicity, and performance can be played as a game or as live action theatre; here I offer you a ritual act of Chaos and Transformation which is useful in disrupting order and randomizing the masks we wear. Begin each new day with a set of possible selves to perform; write down three masculine and three feminine characters you know well enough to perform, roll a six sided dice to find today’s persona, and live as that character until tomorrow, when you can become someone entirely different. And regardless of who you are today, you will have five more selves in reserve.

    Such constructions of identity as performance flow from the nature of self as a development of the persona or Greek theatrical mask characters speak through; a prochronism or history expressed in our form of how we solved problems in adaptation, like the shell of a fantastic sea creature.

     Always there remains the struggle between the masks that others make for us and those we make for ourselves; this is the first revolution in which we all must fight, the struggle to create ourselves.

     And what of the underlying forces of love and desire from which such structures and figures are made?

    Milan Kundera, paraphrasing Plato in Phaidos, wrote; “Love is the longing for the half of ourselves we have lost”. To this I would add a conditional which directs us to the function of love in the construction of identity; love also reveals us to ourselves, for we choose those we love as figures of who we wish to become.

     We choose those we love and share our lives with in part because they represent potential selves and qualities we aspire to realize within ourselves, as informing and motivating sources and shaping forces. This is what it means to become human, and why interdependence is at the heart of becoming human. Our values are revealed in our circle of partners and friends.

      Love is dangerous because it is free, uncontrollable, wild. Love redeems, transforms, and reimagines; love totalizes and transcends. Love like you have laughed in the face of your executioners, because that is exactly what it is.

     As I once said to Jean Genet, it is a poor man who loves nothing beyond reason, and has no pleasures worth dying for.

    Love and desire are linked as forces beyond reason and our own control; this is why they bear redemptive and transformational power, and confer autonomy  in our self-construal and becoming human. Choice and volition have nothing to do with it; there is only the ground of struggle and seizures of power between those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh versus the falsification of authorized identities.

    We are made of stories, both the ones we tell about ourselves and the ones others tell about us, and the first question to ask of a story is, whose story is this?

    When you begin to question the boundary and interface between normality as authorized identity and transgression as seizure of power, between subjugation and liberty, the grotesque and the beautiful, idealizations of masculinity and femininity, of madness and vision, and to challenge the tyranny of other people’s ideas of virtue, you enter my world, the place of unknowns and the limitless possibilities of becoming human, marked Here Be Dragons on our maps of human being, meaning, and value.

     Welcome to freedom and its wonders and terrors; to reimagination, transformation, and discovery.

     May the new truths you forge bring you joy, and don’t forget to run amok and be ungovernable.

     As I wrote in my daily journal of March 8 2021, International Women’s Day: Interrogating the Idea of Woman and Identities of Sex and Gender As Performance Art and Revolutionary Struggle; What is a woman or a man, and how are such identities constructed?

     On this International Woman’s Day, I am wondering how we define such a thing, and how our idealizations of masculine and feminine beauty shape our range of choices in the performance of ourselves.

    I am thinking of these things in the context of a conversation in which a friend described the primary trauma of realizing they were imprisoned in a body whose sex did not match their gender, and in this vulnerable space was multiply attacked on grounds of falsely identifying as female in order to appropriate female spaces of performance.

    It seems to me that trans exclusion reinforces and originates in a narrow definition of gender restricted to biology, and one which privileges morphology, signs and forms over hormones, genetics, and inner experience; this ignores free will and the inviolable principles of freedom of conscience and of self-construal, the social and historical construction of identity as a ground of being, and also perpetuates systemic inequalities and authorized identities of sex and gender.

      History, memory, identity; recursive processes of adaptation, change, reimagination, transformation, and metamorphosis whereby we become self-created and self owned beings in struggle with authorized identities and systems of unequal power and oppression.

     Gender is always fluid, relational, ambiguous, and a ground of struggle. It is also, like sexual orientation, distinct from biological sex and not a spectrum with endpoint limits but an infinite Moebius Strip where we are born and exist everywhere at once as polymorphosly perverse, to use Freud’s delicious phrase; except where identity is chosen as seizure of power or imposed by other people’s ideas of virtue, normality, the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden.

    To be an outcast is a terrible thing; but to be forced to create your own forms because you fit in no one else’s bottles can be a wonderful thing as well, though never an easy one.

    Sartre described this with the phrase; ”We are condemned to be free,” in his 1946 lecture Existentialism Is A Humanism, and what this means is that in a universe empty of all meaning and value other than that which we ourselves create, we must balance the terror of our nothingness with the joy of our total freedom.

    In such a universe, free of imposed meaning and of purpose, all rules are arbitrary and can be changed, rules which are legacies of our histories and the fictional laws of false and unjust authorities, wherein all normalities are negotiable, and the limitless possibilities of becoming human may be pursued as our uniqueness through the reimagination and transformation of poetic vision and metaphorical truths.

     Life is a performance art, and we all have one problem in common; each of us must reinvent how to be human.

     This process of becoming human or individuation is controlled by a second or historical principle; humans create themselves over time, and a third or social principle; humans create each other through their interdependence.

     Our idea of self derives from the persona, the ancient Greek theatrical mask through which characters speak, and the possibilities of becoming human are a function of the struggle between authorized identities and the self- ownership of autonomous individuals.

     Our identities, including those of sex and gender, are literally masks; social constructs and artifacts of our process of adaptation and becoming human. Herein the primary shaping, informing, and motivating source is the interface between authority and autonomy as an unknown and unclaimed potential, a blank space of limitless possibilities of the reimagination of humankind, like the places marked Here Be Dragons on our maps of human being, meaning, and value.

     As we learn from John Cage in music, Harold Pinter in theatre, and Piet Mondrian in art, it is the blank spaces which define and order meaning; and in history it is the silenced and erased voices to which we must listen most carefully, for here the emptiness speaks to us of secret power and of the key functions and relationships which authority must conceal to maintain its hegemony over us.

     Let us pay attention to the man behind the curtain.

     Always there remains the struggle between the masks that others make for us and those we make for ourselves.

     This is the first revolution in which we all must fight; the struggle to create ourselves.

     Our performance of identities of sex and gender is a theatre of possibilities, of negotiations and dances with normativity and the transgression of boundaries, of the questioning and reimagination of idealizations of masculinity and femininity, of self-creation as liberation and autonomous total freedom, a quest for our uniqueness and for the human transcendent, and of truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh.

    This need not be determinative or prescriptive, but a space of free creative play.

     All true art defiles and exalts.

      Are we not both Harley Quinn and the Joker, bound together in one flesh?      

Joker X Harley: Bad Things

     A map of our uniqueness within a context of community and solidarity in becoming human, and a vision of the Platonic Republic: the great film Paris Is Burning

Joseph Cassara’s House of the Impossible Beauties

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35068748-the-house-of-impossible-beauties?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_14

Sartre’s lecture in Existentialism is a Humanism

https://wmpeople.wm.edu/asset/index/cvance/sartre

     Here are my three essays interrogating identities of sex and gender:

March 8 2024 International Women’s Day: Interrogating the Idea of Woman and Identities of Sex and Gender As Performance Art and Revolutionary Struggle, Identities of Sex and Gender Part 1 of 3

March 9 2024 A Sorting Hat of One’s Own: A General Theory of Identities of Sex and Gender as Processes and Functions of Personality, Identities of Sex and Gender Part 2

March 10 2024 Of Love and Desire as Forces of Autonomy and Liberation: Identities of Sex and Gender Part 3

        References

https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test

https://www.breakingthesilence.weareallout.org/

                     The Idea of Gender, a reading list

                      Ideology

 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Judith Butler   

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/85767.Gender_Trouble?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_14

Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality, Anne Fausto-Sterling

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/49427.Sexing_the_Body?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_90

                     Biography

David Bowie: A Life, Dylan Jones

 Monsieur d’Eon Is a Woman: A Tale of Political Intrigue and Sexual Masquerade by Gary Kates.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/116094.Monsieur_d_Eon_Is_a_Woman?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_93

                 Fiction

Virginia Woolf’s Orlando

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18839.Orlando?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_24

Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18423.The_Left_Hand_of_Darkness?ref=nav_sb_ss_3_47

 Time Is the Thing a Body Moves Through, by T. Fleischmann.

May 16 2025 Refuse to Submit, and Remain Unconquered: Anniversary of the Romani Resistance at Auschwitz

     We celebrate Romani Resistance Day, in which thousands of prisoners in the Gypsy Camp of Auschwitz defied the SS and fought as a brotherhood of liberty, for their lives and one another beyond hope of victory or survival but also for the dignity of humankind and the one freedom which is never lost; to remain unconquered in refusal to submit.

     Like the Spartans at Marathon their actions on this day redeemed the chance of liberty for us all, reaffirmed our human meaning and value in the face of dehumanizing tyranny and racist genocide, and along with countless other acts of solidarity and valor among nearly every people on earth in the glorious human struggle against fascism of World War Two helped civilization win time to recognize and meet the threat of atavistic barbarism and the divisions of otherness which remain to be vanquished.

     I think of such things in terms of my own Last Stands, which recently include the defense of Mariupol in Ukraine from April 18 to March 22 2022, of Panjshir in Afghanistan from August 24 through September 8 2021, of al Quds or Jerusalem from May 10 to 21 2021 and in the ongoing Third Intifada, and since October of 2023 in the Revolutions of Burma, Haiti, and in the Gaza War and the Third Intifada for the Liberation of Palestine including the victorious Red Sea Campaign which counter blockades the Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid to Gaza, and Romani Resistance Day also coincides with the final day of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of which I wrote in my post of April 19.

    Herein I remember the Oath of the Resistance as given to me by Jean Genet in 1982 in Beirut, which he repurposed from that of the French Foreign Legion in Paris 1940; “We swear our loyalty to each other, to resist and yield not, and surrender not our fellows”. He said it was the finest thing he ever stole, but I often think of this in terms of a definition of the beauty of human beings; to become Unconquered and free as self created beings in refusal to submit to authority and its instruments of violence, force and control, and the repression of dissent, to refuse our dehumanization and the theft of our souls and autonomy and to do all of this in solidarity and absolute loyalty to each other.  

    As he once said to me; “Is this not the beauty of men, to resist and never yield, to cede nothing to the enemy, not love nor hope, not our history nor the chance for a future of our own choosing, neither our monstrosity nor our grandeur, nothing of our humanity nor of any human being whose life is in our power to harm or help, to live beyond all limits and all laws and to risk everything to do this for each other?”

    Should you ever find it necessary to look for idealizations of masculine beauty as compassion, loyalty, fearlessness, beyond the fetishization of violence or the addiction of power, look to examples of solidarity and our duty of care for each other in the heroism of our mutual defense, in our glorious history of resistance and liberation struggle as a Band of Brothers such as Romani Resistance Day and countless others like it. When everything else is stripped away, this is what remains, and what we truly are.

     This our common humanity, this solidarity, this United Humankind. This, this, this.

    Our choices and actions in such Defining Moments become a forge of the soul by which we may reinvent ourselves. In the end what determines the quality of our humanity and who we will become among the limitless possibilities of human being, meaning, and value and of becoming human as a seizure of power and self ownership of our identity is a simple thing, but not an easy one; how will you use your power?

    We celebrate this, and will soon celebrate Memorial Day which honors our sacred dead in wars of antifascist resistance and revolutionary struggle of liberation, in a context of historical repetition of the conditions which gave rise to the Axis powers, pandemic and economic, political, and civilizational collapse, and in the rising darkness of a global Fourth Reich of authoritarian tyrannies whose figurehead is the repulsive and abominable Traitor Trump.

    The tide of darkness, barbarism, atavisms of instinct, dehumanization, and fear weaponized by authority in service to power has begun to turn here in America with the Restoration of our democratic values and ideals during the Biden Presidency, if a deeply flawed, relative, and highly contingent and imperiled Restoration, but we have only just begun to reclaim our humanity from the jaws of fascist tyranny and terror. Much of our world still lives under its shadow, and Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, and his Deplorables have won the recapture of the state and the final subversion of democracy in our performative elections; this we must resist.

     This is an evil which moves among us both brazen in the arrogance of power and privilege and unseen, like an ambush predator concealed by the lies and illusions with which it masks itself, and our greatest weapon against racism and fascism is exposure of its true face. By exposure, second of the four primary duties of a citizen among Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority, I mean parrhesia which Michel Foucault reimagined as truth telling and of praxis or the action of our values and ideals as a sacred calling to pursue the truth; to write, speak, teach, and organize democracy as freedom, equality, truth, and justice.

     There is no better evocation of fascism as the great enemy of humankind, of the origins of evil, the brokenness of the world, and the flaws of our humanity than Jerzy Kosinski’s magisterial novel The Painted Bird and its film. Herein a child wanders in a purgatory of fear and force, perversions and cruelties, a witness of history written by a Polish Catholic who as a child refugee in Eastern Europe was often mistaken for and tortured as a Gypsy, from his childhood therapy journal.

     My mother wrote a study of psychosomatic muteness based on his novel, his childhood therapy journal, and Soviet medical records which describe his long struggle from the age to nine at Liberation to regain his power of speech at 14, and the history and stories of The Painted Bird were part of my teenage years as family conversations, which became a major informing and motivating source for my primary interest in the origins of evil and the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force. I found my voice metaphorically at the age he did literally, the summer before high school in Brazil, and I saw myself in his story.

     The Painted Bird is a story of humankind and of the collapse of civilization in the twentieth century during the Second World War, but it also typifies the history of the displaced, vilified, and relentlessly persecuted and abused Romani as an iconic figure of Others, a space they share with Jewish peoples. For the Romani are the Shadow of European civilization, cast as Caliban-like figures to establish and reinforce the tyranny of our normalities and the boundaries of otherness, to whom any atrocity may be done; dehumanized as thieves, beggars, whores, categories of exclusion which serve to legitimize authority and identitarian constructions of nationalism.

     All those who are Outcasts occupy this figural space with the Romani; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased. And we who would become human must place our lives in the balance with them. 

     In the legacies of historical inequalities and injustices, the failure of our ideals of diversity and inclusion, and the limits of our universal human rights exposed by our persecution of Outcasts such as the Romani as our unwilling Sin Eaters, we find a measure of the distance we have yet to go to become civilized or even fully human.

     Which makes it all the more remarkable that under the weight of centuries of oppression and demonization, the heroes of the Romani Resistance did not go quietly to their deaths, but fought for one another til the end, defiant and free.  In the words of Dylan Thomas; “Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.”

     May we all find within ourselves the will to refuse to submit to force and control, and to remain Unconquered.

      When they come for us, as those who would enslave us always have and will, let them find not a people subjugated by division, learned helplessness, and despair, but a United Humankind in which we are all of us guarantors of each other’s humanity.

     As written by Rain in Counterpunch; “May 16th, 1944, was the day Himmler’s Auschwitz Decree was to be fulfilled. Approximately 6,500 Romani victims confined in the Zigeunerlager, the “Gypsy Camp” at Auschwitz-Birkenau, were to be “liquidated.” Surrounded by the SS, the Romani refused to exit the barracks that paid mute witness to 17,000 of their relatives who had already been murdered in the gas chambers or Mengele directed “medical” experiments, worked to death as slave laborers, slowly starved, or succumbed to disease. “We’re not coming out! You come in here!” Mano Höllenreiner, then a ten-year old boy, remembered his father shouting.

     Constricted as they were by death, on this day they refused to die. Just hours before, they had been warned that after roll call next morning they would be executed. In preparation to resist they fashioned weapons out of slats from bunks, some held rocks, others had secreted away tools from a warehouse in the compound. It wasn’t so much an act of defiance but of love – for each other and those brutally taken from them, for whom they would live at least one more day. It was an extraordinary display of courage and testament to the human spirit.”

     As written by Michal Schuster in an article entitled The Romani Uprising in Auschwitz, 16 May 1944; “The year 1944 can simply be called the closing phase of the so-called “Final Solution to the Gypsy question” in Nazi-occupied Europe, including on the territory of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. After transporting most Roma to the Auschwitz complex during 1943, smaller transports there took place during 1944. On 16 May 1944 the first attempt to annihilate all the members of the so-called “Gypsy Camp” at Auschwitz-Birkenau took place and was prevented by an uprising of the prisoners there. The most tragic event did finally take place and the camp and its inhabitants were entirely destroyed at the beginning of August 1944.

     First attempt to destroy the “Gypsy Camp” and the Romani prisoners’ uprising:

     The commander of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss, ordered at the beginning of 1944 the acceleration of the work already underway in one section of Birkenau, primarily the construction of ramps and the rails for the three-rail branch of the Oświęcim-Katowice railway line, which led to Crematorium I and Crematorium II. The commander of all the crematoria, SS Otto Moll, had to ensure, during the course of one week, repairs to all the crematoria, completion of the construction of the buildings, and the start of new construction, as well as the erection of several rooms where the prisoners were stripped near the repaired Bunker II and behind Crematorium V. The prisoners also dug two big pits for burning corpses.

     All of the preparations were performed in order to receive a transport of Jews from Hungary. Those new prisoners who were labeled capable of work during the selection would need accommodation, so the highest SS command at the main camp decided on 15 May 1944 to kill everyone in the “Gypsy Family Camp”. That would free up space in all of camp B-II-e for more of the Jews from Hungary.

     The final action was to have been performed on the evening of 16 May, when the gong was rung announcing a ban on leaving the camp (the so-called Lagersperre) and it was closed. Trucks drove up and parked in front of the gate to the camp; 50 -60 members of a special SS commando unit jumped out of them and called on the prisoners to quickly leave the residential blocks. Inside the blocks, however, a tense silence prevailed and the prisoners refused to come out, barricading the doors and desperately preparing to defend themselves with rocks and work tools. The members of the SS commando unit were startled by this disobedience and their commander decided to postpone the action.

     Romani Holocaust survivor Hugo Höllenreiner (born 1933 in Munich), who was deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp with his family in 1943, later recalled those moments of resistance as follows:  “There were about seven or eight men, definitely, who came to the gate. Dad shouted out – the whole building trembled when he shouted:  ‘We’re not coming out! You come in here! We’re waiting here! If you want something, you have to come inside!’ “

     The entire event was described in a report by Tadeusz Joachimowski (1908-1979), a former Polish political prisoner in the Auschwitz concentration camp who was assigned to be a “scribe” (a writer) in the “Gypsy Camp”, as follows:  “The last commander of the Gypsy Camp and the current rapportführer [reporting officer] was Bonigut. He was probably from Yugoslavia. He disagreed with the approaches and tactics of the SS. He was a very good person. On 15 May 1944 he came after me and said things looked bad for the Gypsy Camp. An order had been issued to destroy it and had reportedly already received confirmation from the political department through Dr Mengele. The Gypsy Camp was to be destroyed and its crew killed using gas. There were roughly  500 Gypsies in the camp at that time. Bonigut entrusted me with informing those Gypsies whom I trusted about what was ahead. He asked me to warn them so they would not go like sheep to the slaughter. He also told me that the signal for the beginning of the action would be the Lagersperre and that the Gypsies should not leave their barracks. Bonigut himself warned several Gypsies of the action. I also (secretly) performed this task. The next day at around 7 PM I heard the gong announcing the Lagersperre. Automobiles drove up in front of the Gypsy Camp and 50 – 60 SS men armed with machine guns got out of them. They immediately surrounded the buildings where the Gypsies lived. Some SS members entered this residential area shouting ‘Los, los‘. There was total calm in the barracks. The Gypsies, armed with handcuffs, knives, shovels and stones, waited to see what would happen. They did not leave the barracks. The SS members were appalled and left themselves. After a brief consultation, they went to find the Blockführerstube [the commander of that block] in order to inform the commander of the action. After some time I heard a whistle. The SS men who were surrounding the barracks left their positions, got back in the automobiles, and drove away. The closure of the camp was lifted. On the next day (17 May 1944), Lagerführer Bonigut came to me and said the Gypsies were rescued, for now…”.

     While there was no open clash between the Romani prisoners and the SS members, this event played a significant role. It decidedly was not the habit in the concentration camps for the prisoners to resist a planned, prepared action en masse right before it was to be undertaken. There is absolutely no doubt that the armed SS commando could have suppressed this act of resistance, but decided not to go into an open confrontation with the prisoners and preferred to achieve their aims in another way. This event is unequivocally an uprising and occupies a significant place in the tragic history of the Holocaust of the European Roma.

     In the so-called “Gypsy Camp” at Birkenau there were approximately 6,500 prisoners, half of whom were subsequently put into quarantine in the main camp, some at the end of May and start of June, others at the start of August 1944. They included prisoners from Bohemia, Germany, and Poland.

     The destruction of the “Gypsy Camp” at Birkenau:

     About 10,000 women from Hungary then arrived at the “Gypsy Camp” and were accommodated in the odd-numbered blocks, while the Romani prisoners were put on the even-numbered side. They moved a second time into the rear half of the camp when men from Hungary arrived and were put in the front section of the camp. In July 1944, Himmler decided to destroy the rest of the “Gypsy Camp”. On the morning of 1 August, those prisoners fit for work were supposed to report for transport elsewhere, and Antonín Absolon-Růžička (born 30 September 1930 in the Moravian village of Mistřín) took advantage of the opportunity. He later recalled:  “One day in summer when I heard on the grounds that a new transport was leaving and lining up at the gate, I ran out there, naked, fleeing the blocks and heading for the canteen. I met my sister Jana on the way. She asked where I was running to and I told her I wanted to leave with the transport. She started to persuade me not to leave, saying we two were the only ones left, that I should stay with her. All I know is that I told her I had to go. I didn’t even say good-bye I was in such a hurry…”.

     On the next day, 2 August 1944, the final transports to the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Ravensbrück were put together out of all the female and male prisoners fit for work from the “Gypsy Camp”. There were 918 boys and men sent to Buchenwald, of whom 151 had Protectorate citizenship. At the Buchenwald concentration camp, thanks to these transports from Auschwitz, the number of Romani and Sinti prisoners almost doubled. The Ravensbrück transports included 490 female prisoners. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to determine their state or territorial citizenship. Nevertheless, women from the Protectorate were certainly among them.

     Through these six work transports, these female and male prisoners left the camp at Birkenau for good, because at the time the so-called “Gypsy Family Camp” was about to be destroyed and the fate of its remaining prisoners had been decided.

     After their departure, only the elderly, mothers with children and the fathers who didn’t want to leave their families, and orphans remained in the “Gypsy Camp”. During the late night of 2 August and the early morning hours of 3 August the block was closed (Blocksperre) and the 2 897 children, elderly people, the infirm and women were taken in trucks to the courtyard of Crematorium V. There their unexpected resistance had to be broken, after which they were herded into the gas chambers.

     Those horrible moments were described by a member of the so-called Special Division (Sonderkommando), Filip Müller (born 1922 in the Slovak town of Sered’): “The room for removing clothing was stuffed full of people by midnight. The anxiety was growing minute by minute… desperate cries could be heard from all sides, accusations, lamentations, remorse. The voices called out in chorus: ‘We are Germans of the Reich! We’ve done nothing wrong!’ From elsewhere could be heard: ‘We want to live! Why do you want to kill us?’… The liquidation proceeded as usual. Moll and his aides unlocked the safeties on their pistols and rifles and uncompromisingly called on those who had taken their clothes off to leave the room and go into the three spaces where they would be poisoned with gas. On that final trip many were weeping with desperation… Even from within the gas chambers, for a long time afterward, we heard intermittent calls and cries until the gas performed its work and the last voices were snuffed out.”

     The bodies of the murdered, who included many prisoners from the Protectorate, were then burned in the pits near the Crematorium because it was not yet running.

     A recollection of the murder of those in the “Gypsy Camp” was also recorded by camp commander Rudolf Höss in his memoirs: “They did not know what awaited them until the final moment; they only realized it when they were brought into Crematorium No.V. It was not easy to lead them into the chamber. I didn’t see it, but Schwarzhuber told me about it, that no liquidation action of the Jews had been as difficult as the liquidation of the Gypsies.”

     During this action, camp doctor Josef Mengele personally shot dead the male Romani twins on whom he had been performing experiments in order to subsequently use their bodies for autopsy. The female twins were transferred to the Hindenburg concentration camp. Irma Valdová-Krausová survived with her sisters because of that, and later recalled: “On that day Dr Mengele came to the camp at 18:30 in order to take the remaining twins away, including my two sisters Anna and Alžběta. Of my entire extended family, I was their only relative left, and they did not want to leave me, no matter the cost. During the confusion they put me in the car as well, which saved me from a certain death.”

     This mass murder was followed by the brutal killing of the female and male prisoners who, after being transported elsewhere, had been sent back to Auschwitz-Birkenau to die in the gas chambers because they were exhausted and unfit for work. For this purpose, 200 Romani boys were sent from the concentration camp at Buchenwald on 26 September 1944 and 800 Romani men were sent on 10 October 1944. On 11 October 1944 and then on 14 October 1944 a total of 217 Romani girls and women were sent back to Auschwitz from the work commando units at Ravensbrück concentration camp. Some underwent a second selection and were once again transported back to Ravensbrück, while the rest ended up, like all of the boys and men who were returned to Auschwitz, in the gas chambers.”

      As I have been immersed in the literature of Auschwitz and its reflections in the Israeli genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians for days now, and find myself in need of something joyful to balance the darkness lest it consume me, especially that of Kosinski’s novel The Painted Bird which became part of my identity as a teenager who saw himself in its tortured child protagonist, the flaws of my humanity now betray the vision which exalts me; the world does not need my grief nor my absurd desires, yet this too is human. The world needs our rage against the dying of the light, and solidarity of action regardless of the cost; but it also needs our poetic vision in the reimagination and transformation of human being, meaning, and value, and the limitless possibilities of becoming human.

      I find my thoughts surfacing memories of a vanished age, when I made mischief behind the Iron Curtain with the famous gypsy Bluey, smuggler and kingpin of the East Berlin black market who ran an underground railroad and for-hire intelligence service through the Berlin Wall. The man could hold a crowd spellbound with his stories, and roaring with laughter; in his persona as a circus clown, he made an art of being likeable and built an outlaw empire from trading favors and secrets and making things happen for powerful people, and a Great Game of outwitting authorities, destabilizing tyrannies, championing the powerless, and subverting systems and regimes of force and control.

      This was my entrée into the world of the Romani, which I might have married into had events unfolded differently, and the reason my languages include Vlax Romani, the major Romani language and that of its heartland in Transylvania and Eastern Europe, and its origin or relative Vlachs or Aromanian,  a Romance language created by the historical migrations and transformations of cultures in the borderlands between the Habsburg, Ottoman, and Venetian Empires, and influenced more by Greek than Slavic as a disambiguating characteristic from modern Romanian, a related language also originating in the Latin of the Roman Empire and its long centuries of disintegration and change. Many Romani whom I knew spoke Vlax, Vlachs, Romanian, and Hungarian interchangeably as code switching, and also spoke Hochdeutsch which is the second language of Hungary and the official language of Germany and Austria as Standard German.

     Being able to pass as a member of a number of nationalities including multilingualism is a necessity of survival and a defining characteristic of being Romani as a protean and stealth identity among peoples who would kill them for being who they are. Bluey once described it to me like this: “To be Romani is determined by three truths not of our making; first, no one stands with us, so we must stand with each other in everything. Second, we will be killed or driven out if discovered, so we must live within identities of disguise. Third, we are powerless and few, so we must live in the margins and in the shadows; its why they call us crows, scavengers. This is how we have survived more than a thousand years, by these three rules.”

     Here I wish to clarify and disambiguate the origin and meaning of the terms Romani, which broadly describes an ethnic identity of former citizens of the Byzantine Roman Empire who assimilated Latin, arriving in the Balkans nine hundred years ago having migrated from India in a single wave some fifteen hundred years ago by DNA evidence, and Gypsy, a far narrower title of profession derived from the Hungarian gyepu which refers to the system of remote forest defenses in Transylvania guarding its frontier and border with the Ottoman Empire, of which Romani warriors were a part as foederati. Romani describes blood and language, Gypsy describes a historical social role as a guardian or ranger and a multigenerational brotherhood of warriors which persists as a pan-European secret society, bound by ancient oaths to defend civilization beyond its borders, wherever law ceases to have meaning and all that remains is the valor and loyalty of men.

     To be a Gypsy is to be a guardian of humankind and of civilization against barbarism, and a guarantor of our uniqueness and universal rights in a free society of equals, wherein there are no laws and no limits to our possibilities of becoming human beyond those chosen by ourselves.

     That the Empire to which these oaths were sworn has not existed for seven hundred years is irrelevant; my kind of people.

     As he grew up in Ireland and when ten years old went alone to live in the streets of London, Bluey spoke English laden with Cockney rhyming slang, 16th century Thieves Cant, and the hybrid Irish Gaelic-Traveller cryptolanguage Shelta, a complex patois he and his crew, who were from everywhere, used as a secret language.

     In this company, which operated under cover as a circus throughout Europe, I met the girl whose echoes and reflections live in the images of a doppelganger I chanced upon, dancing with crows.

     Images which follow my notes and citations of references are of the Polish corset designer Koseatra, but breathtaking in likeness to the gypsy girl I very nearly married, over three decades ago. Impossible that this is the same girl; she would be over a generation older than Koseatra, where these photographs have frozen her image in amber from before the fall of the Iron Curtain, timeless and beyond the limits of the human.

    The eyes are the same; tinged green when laughing and mischevious, and in the darkness fathoms of ice blue with a strange silver reflectivity, when closer to the wolf.

   So also her grace of movement, refined and elegant, and the regal stillness of her bearing in repose; like the serenity of a bodhisattva, or the coiled stillness of a lioness about to pounce.

    But it’s the eyes that compel.

     Who could look into such eyes, and send the unique and marvelous being who looks out through them to destruction and death, as the Nazis did countless times at Auschwitz?

    This is among the true horrors of fascism, for men who could do this are dead to beauty, wonder, awe, and love.

     Fascism is a disease of possession, which steals the soul. Mere bundles of atavisms of instinct, degenerate and hollow, are fascists, whose zombiefication in service to power is a terror to be hunted relentlessly and purged from among us, no less than the amoral rapacity of those who would enslave us.

     Let us give to fascism the only reply it merits; Never Again!

THE PAINTED BIRD Official Trailer

https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/the-romani-uprising-in-auschwitz-16-may-1944/

And the Violins Stopped Playing, by Alexander Ramati

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1474003.And_the_Violins_Stopped_Playing

Ceija Stojka: Even Death Is Afraid of Auschwitz, Ceija Stojka (artist), Karin Berger (Contributor), Barbara Dankwortt (Contributor), Tímea Junghaus (Contributor), Lith Bahlmann (Editor), Matthias Reichelt (Editor)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26508356-ceija-stojka?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_46

The Color of Smoke: A Novel, Menyhért Lakatos, Ann Major (Translator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22926616-the-color-of-smoke

     While the witness of history of survivors of Auschwitz includes few Romani such as Alexander Ramati and Ceija Stojka, there are many others whose stories can remind us who we are, and what’s worth fighting for.

Auschwitz, by Laurence Rees

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/978098.Auschwitz

Our Crime Was Being Jewish: Hundreds of Holocaust Survivors Tell Their Stories, by Anthony S. Pitch, Michael Berenbaum (Foreword)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25533564-our-crime-was-being-jewish

Survival in Auschwitz, by Primo Levi

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6174.Survival_in_Auschwitz

At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities, by Jean Améry

Speak You Also: A Survivor’s Reckoning, by Paul Steinberg

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/783420.Speak_You_Also

Five Chimneys: A Woman Survivor’s True Story of Auschwitz, by Olga Lengyel

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/249825.Five_Chimneys

Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers, by Filip Müller

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/73291.Eyewitness_Auschwitz

In the Hell of Auschwitz: The Wartime Memoirs of Judith Sternberg Newman,

by Judith Sternberg Newman

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/45035834-in-the-hell-of-auschwitz

Inside the Gas Chambers: Eight Months in the Sonderkommando of Auschwitz,

by Shlomo Venezia

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6296148-inside-the-gas-chambers

999: The Extraordinary Young Women of the First Official Jewish Transport to Auschwitz, by Heather Dune Macadam (Goodreads Author), Caroline Moorehead (Foreword)

The Auschwitz Photographer: The Forgotten Story of the WWII Prisoner Who Documented Thousands of Lost Souls, by Luca Crippa

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/57659036-the-auschwitz-photographer

The Sisters of Auschwitz: The True Story of Two Jewish Sisters’ Resistance in the Heart of Nazi Territory, by Roxane van Iperen

Outcry: Holocaust Memoirs, by Manny Steinberg

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23268862-outcry

The Dead Years: Holocaust Memoirs, by Joseph Schupack

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34235504-the-dead-years

Hank Brodt Holocaust Memoirs: A Candle and a Promise, by Deborah Donnelly

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/32467262-hank-brodt-holocaust-memoirs

This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen, by Tadeusz Borowski,

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/228244.This_Way_for_the_Gas_Ladies_and_Gentlemen

Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account, by Miklós Nyiszli

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/315578.Auschwitz

The Dressmakers of Auschwitz: The True Story of the Women Who Sewed to Survive, by Lucy Adlington

By Chance Alone: A Remarkable True Story of Courage and Survival at Auschwitz, by Max Eisen

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25989447-by-chance-alone

The Violinist of Auschwitz, by Ellie Midwood

The Volunteer: The True Story of the Resistance Hero who Infiltrated Auschwitz, by Jack Fairweather

     Here I wish to include Sologdin’s review in Goodreads of Giogio Agamben’s four essays published as Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive, a brilliant problematization of the nature and functions of the literature of witness, an idea central to my own life mission and ars poetica of the witness of history, along with Foucault’s truthtelling a sacred calling in pursuit of truth. With Foucault’s lectures on parrhesia which I attended at UC Berkeley in 1983, and left their stamp of strangeness upon me, here follows one of the finest explications of why I write which I have yet found:

Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive, by Giorgio Agamben

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/85830.Remnants_of_Auschwitz

review by Sologdin

     “Four essays. Preface opens with the reasonable proposition that the discrepancy regarding Auschwitz “concerns the very structure of testimony” (12): “On the one hand, what happened in the camps appears to the survivors as the only true thing and, as such, absolutely unforgettable; on the other hand, this truth is to the same degree unimaginable, that is, irreducible to the real elements that constitute it” (id.). The discrepancy concerns “facts so real, by comparison, nothing is truer; a reality that necessarily exceeds its factual elements—such is the aporia of Auschwitz” ((id.). One survivor, Lewental, a sonderkommando, wrote that “the complete truth is far more tragic, far more frightening” (id.)—to which author responds: “more tragic, more frightening than what?” We see that the “aporia of Auschwitz is, indeed, the very aporia of historical knowledge: a non-coincidence between facts and truth, between verification and comprehension” (id.). We also see that

     One of the lessons of Auschwitz is that it is infinitely harder to grasp the mind of an ordinary person than to understand the mind of a Spinoza or Dante. (Hannah Arendt’s discussion of the ‘banality of evil,’ so often misunderstood, must also be understood in this sense.) (13)

     Though Agamben states that this text has little that can’t be found in the actual testimonials, “it became clear that testimony contained at its core an essential lacuna: in other words, the survivors bore witness to something it is impossible to bear witness to” (id). His task became an interrogation of the lacuna, even though “listening to something absent” may seem counterintuitive: “it made it necessary to clear away almost all of the doctrines that, since Auschwitz, have been advanced in the name of ethics” (id.).

     I – “The Witness”

     In Auschwitz, one reason to survive was “the idea of becoming a witness” (15). Primo Levi “does not consider himself a writer; he becomes a writer so that he can bear witness” (id.).

     Latin has two terms for our ‘witness’: testis (“from which our word ‘testimony’ derives, etymologically signifies the person, who, in a trial or lawsuit between two rival parties, is in the position of a third party (*terstis)” (17)) and superstes (“a person who has lived through something, who has experienced an event from beginning to end and can therefore bear witness to it”) (id.). These latinate concepts problematize the notion of bearing witness to Auschwitz, as we shall see. Levi is interested only in “what makes judgment possible: the gray zone in which victims become executioners and executioners become victims” (17). Judgment can be made, of course, but important that “the law not presume to exhaust the question. A non-juridical element of truth exists such that the quaestio facti can never be reduced to the quaestio iuris” (id.).

     Author notes the standard “tacit confusion of ethical and juridical categories” in this connection (18)—all of this is “contaminated by law,” which has the “ultimate aim” of “the production of a res judicata” (id.), quite distinct from the finding of truth or the disposition in justice. Rather, “the sentence becomes the substitute [supplement?] for the true and the just, being held as true despite its falsity and injustice” (id.). Via reference to Kafka, law is reduced to judgment, and judgment to trial: “execution and transgression, innocence and guilt, obedience and disobedience all become indistinct” (19) (the plotinian hoion, of course) and dude concludes that judgment constitutes “the mystery of trial.” Some suggestion that the post-war trials (which involved “only a few hundred people,” an “evident insufficiency” (19)) “are responsible for the conceptual confusion that, for decades, has made it impossible to think through Auschwitz,” as “they helped spread the idea that the problem of Auschwitz had been overcome.” We get now that “law did not exhaust the problem, but rather that the very problem was so enormous as to call into question law itself” (20).

     Some discussion here on ‘responsibility’—it has been “irredeemably contaminated by law” (20) (likely we need an archaeology of contamination, considering dude’s reliance thereupon) (cf. also Bakhtin on ‘answerability’). Levi would place certain occurrences in a “zone of irresponsibility,” based on his “unprecedented discovery” at Auschwitz of “an area that is independent of every establishment of responsibility,” wherein “the long chain of conjunction between victim and executioner comes loose” (21). We are not “beyond good and evil” (i.e., with Nietzsche), but “before them”; “before is more important than any beyond—that the ‘underman’ must matter to us more than the ‘overman’” (id.). Again, this “First Circle” of irresponsibility is Arendt’s banality of evil. The sonderkommando is the representative of this zone of irresponsibility (25).

     Etymology again tells the story: spondeo “means ‘to become the guarantor of something for someone (or for oneself) with respect to someone’” (id.). For the Romans, the “custom was that a free man could consign himself as a hostage—that is, in a state of imprisonment, from which the term obligatio derives—to guarantee the compensation of a wrong or the fulfillment of an obligation” (22), and the “term sponsor indicated the person who substituted himself for the reus, promising, in the case of a breach of contract, to furnish the requested service” (id.). Responsibility is accordingly “genuinely juridical and not ethical” wherein “the legal bond was considered to inhere in the body of the person responsible” (id.). (We shall recall this when we get around to volume IX.)

Responsibility and guilt thus express simply two aspects of legal imputability; only later were they interiorized and moved outside law. Hence the insufficiency and opacity of every ethical doctrine that claims to be founded on these two concepts. (22)

     Eichmann at his trial walked this distinction by claiming meaninglessly that he felt “guilty before God, not the law” (23). The silliness arises after “having raised juridical categories to the status of supreme ethical categories and thereby irredeemably confusing the fields of law and ethics,” secular ethics still wants to be separate (24): “But ethics is the sphere that recognizes neither guilt nor responsibility; it is, as Spinoza knew, the doctrine of the happy life” (id.), which reduces, furthermore, the ethical to the mere aesthetic. One would think that if there were an irreducible core of the ethical, regarding which aesthetics is of no moment, then it should be discoverable at Auschwitz.

     The analysis turns to Greek martis, ‘martyr,’ as translation for ‘witness’: though the ante-Nicene fathers regarded martyrdom as witness to the faith, the Auschwitz survivors are unanimous that “what happened in the camps has little to do with martyrdom” (26). Conceptually, however, there is some connection, insofar as the Greek term is derived from the verb ‘to remember,’—“the survivor’s vocation is to remember; he cannot not remember” (id.). More significantly, however, the ante-Nicene fathers “were confronted by heretical groups that rejected martyrdom because, in their eyes, it constituted a wholly senseless death (perire sine causa)” (27). The doctrine of martyrdom was confected to justify “the scandal of a meaningless death, of an execution that could only appear as absurd” (id.): “Confronted with the spectacle of a death that was apparently sine causa, the reference to Luke 12: 8-9 and to Matthew 10: 32-33 [quotations omitted] made it possible to interpret martyrdom as a divine command and, thus, to find reason for the irrational” (id.). Levi does not like the term Holocaust because of the implication of an offering or a punishment for sins (28), noting how Wiesel coined the term “then regretted it and wanted to take it back” (id.).

     As we might have predicted, an etymology follows: holocaustos ultimately as a ‘complete burning,’ “used to translate […] the complex sacrificial doctrine of the Bible” (there’s several different Hebrew terms, and the term that the Vulgate rendered as holocaustum, olah, concerns “the dispatch of the offering to the divinity” (29)). The Ante-Nicene fathers used the term literally against Judaism, to “condemn the uselessness of bloody sacrifices” (id.), but then used it metaphorically to refer to the torture of the Christian martyrs, with the ultimate extension, by Augustine, to se holocaustum obtulerit in cruce Iesus.

     The metaphorical usage is not limited to holocaust; the preferred term has been so’ah, which also reveals a metaphorical usage, meaning “‘devastation, catastrophe’ and, in the Bible, often implies the idea of divine punishment (as in Isaiah 10:3)” (31). Unlike holocaust, however, so’ah “contains no mockery”; the former term is an “attempt to establish a connection, however, distant, between Auschwitz and the Biblical olah and between death in the gas chamber and the ‘complete devotion to sacred and superior motives’” (id.). In swearing off the use of the term forever, author notes that “Not only does the term imply an unacceptable equation between crematoria and altars; it also continues a semantic heredity that is from its inception anti-Semitic” (id.).

     Agamben had been challenged for trying to “ruin the unique and unsayable character of Auschwitz” (31). ‘Unique’ is conceded, but ‘unsayable’? Works through Chrysostom’s notion that God is unsayable, unspeakable, unwritable (32), such that the angels must merely adore Him in silence. Author translates ‘adore in silence’ as euphemein, and regards it as the proper way to cognize the complaint that he has ruined the unsayable character of Auschwitz.

     “Testimony, however, contains,” once more, “a lacuna” (33): as Levi notes, “witnesses are by definition survivors and so all, to some degree, enjoyed a privilege.” This lacuna “calls into question the very meaning of testimony and, along with it, the identity and reliability of witnesses” (id.); Levi: “I must repeat: we the survivors, are not the true witnesses.” Levi makes his testimony essentially a representative capacity: “Weeks and months before being snuffed out, they had already lost the ability to observe, to remember, to compare and express themselves. We speak in their stead, by proxy” (34). Agamben notes that “the value of the testimony lies essentially in what it lacks; at its center it contains something that cannot be borne witness to and that discharges the survivors of authority” (id.). Rather, the survivors speak as “pseudo-witnesses” insofar as “they bear witness to the missing testimony” (id.). Of course, by means of the standard adverse inference under the requisite rules of evidence, disappeared witnesses and concealed evidence compels the presumption that the party procuring the absence fears its disclosure and therefore we should assume the worst—so we should not be troubled by pseudo-witnesses.

     This difficulty is explained otherwise as an inside/outside distinction: “The Shoah is an event without witnesses” because “it is impossible to bear witness from the inside” (no one survives to tell) or from the outside “since the ‘outsider’ is by definition excluded from the event” (35). Agamben thinks that the threshold of indistinction (hoion, recall) between inside and outside “could have led to a comprehension of the structure of testimony” (36). Testimony as the “disjunction between two impossibilities of bearing witness” (39)?

     II – “The Muselmann”

     Muselmann as the “untestifiable” to which “no one has borne witness” (41). The Muselmann as a “staggering corpse,” “mummy men,” “living dead” (id.), who “became indifferent to everything happening around them” (43). (The designation arises in Auschwitz from “the impression of seeing Arabs praying” (id.), according to one survivor.) No one had sympathy for the muselmanner (id.), and “all the muselmanner who finished in the gas chambers have the same story, or more exactly, have no story” (44). Little agreement on the “origin of the term Muselmann,” but many synonyms (45).

    Muselmanner as marking “the moving threshold in which a man passed into non-man and in which clinical diagnosis passed into anthropological analysis” (47); “in Auschwitz ethics begins precisely at the point where the Muselmann, the ‘complete witness,’ makes it forever impossible to distinguish between man and non-man” (id.) (NB: hoion). This particular zone of indistinction is what ties this volume very plainly to volume I (to the extent that “the Muselmann’s ‘third realm’ is the perfect cipher for the camp, the non-place in which all disciplinary barriers are destroyed” (id.)) and volume II (insofar as the philosopher’s “extreme situation” is the jurist’s “state of exception”). In this latter connection, Karl Barth’s notion that “human beings have the striking capacity to adapt so well to an extreme situation that it can no longer function as a distinguishing criterion” (49), i.e., noting the “incredible tendency of the limit situation to become habit (hexis recall): “Auschwitz is precisely the place in which the state of exception coincides perfectly with the rule and the extreme situation becomes the very paradigm of life” (id.) (we shall recall the notion of ‘perfect coincidence with the rule’ in volume VIII).

     Muselmanner described with increasing intensity: “witnesses confirm the impossibility of gazing upon the Muselmann” (50); filmmaker who “patiently lingered over naked bodies, over the terrible ‘dolls’ dismembered and stacked one on top of another, could not bear the sight of these half-living beings” (51); Muselmanner as “an absolutely new phenomenon, unbearable to human eyes” (id.); although the Muselmann is noted by most survivors as “a central experience,” the figure is “barely named in the historical studies on the destruction of European Jewry” (52); Levi designates the Muselmann as “he who has seen the Gorgon” (53). Lots on the Gorgon stuff, impossibility of seeing and being seen, &c.

     Much on other interpretations of the Muselmann (57 ff): a biological machine, a limit of certain principles, an experiment, a refutation of Apel’s obligatory communication thesis, as Aristotle’s ‘plant man,’ a radical refutation of all refutations (66).

     Critique of the doctrine of dignity thereafter (67 ff.): “Auschwitz marks the end and the ruin of every ethics of dignity and conformity to a norm” (69) insofar as “the bare life to which human beings were reduced neither demands not conforms to anything” (id.). Rather, “the atrocious news that the survivors carry from the camp to the land of human beings is precisely that it is possible to lose dignity and decency beyond imagination, that there is still life [zoe] in the most extreme degradation” (id.). The Muselmann is accordingly on the threshold of the new ethics of “a form of life that begins where dignity ends” (id.).

     Camps as having the role of “the fabrication of corpses” (as stated by Arendt) (71): “In Auschwitz, people did not die; rather, corpses were produced” (72). (Am skipping over all the Heidegger stuff.) Some reflections on Adorno’s well known positions on Auschwitz (80 ff.), as well as on Foucault’s notation of the passage of sovereignty (“to make die and let live”) to biopower (“to make live and let die”) (82 ff). The Third Reich is of course where the “unprecedented absolutization of the biopower to make live intersects with an equally absolute generalization of the sovereign power to make die, such that biopolitics coincides immediately with thanatopolitics” (83). The NSDAP dream of volkloser Raum, “not simply a matter of a desert,” but rather “a fundamental biopolitical intensity” (85), “an absolute biopolitical space, both lebensraum and todesraum” (86).

     III – “Shame, or on the Subject”

     Upon his liberation by the Red Army, Levi reported a sense of shame, which “becomes the dominant sentiment of survivors” (88), which conflated very soon with guilt. Bettleheim reports it as a survivor’s guilt: “one cannot survive the concentration camp without feeling guilty that one was so incredibly lucky when millions perished” (89).

     This leads to a critique of the doctrine of collective responsibility (94 ff), which Levi acknowledges to be bogus insofar as “it makes no sense to speak of a collective guilt (or innocence) and that only ‘metaphorically can one claim to feel guilty for what’s one’s own people or parents did” (95).

     Some thoughtful comments on Hegelian theory of tragedy in this connection (96 ff). Also, Nietzsche: “The ethics of the twentieth century opens with Nietzsche’s overcoming of resentment” (99) via the eternal return thesis—but: “Auschwitz also marks a decisive rupture” (id.). (I.e., who wants Auschwitz to return? “One cannot want Auschwitz to return for eternity, since in truth it has never ceased to take place; it is always already repeating itself” (101).)

     Levinas on shame: it does not derive from “the consciousness of an imperfection or a lack in our being from which we take distance” (104), but rather “shame is grounded in our being’s incapacity to move away and break from itself” (id.). Shame as “the subject thus has no other content than its own desubjectification; it becomes witness [sic] to its own disorder” (106). Shame as “the fundamental sentiment of being a subject, in the two apparently opposed senses of this phrase: to be subjected and to be sovereign. Shame is what is produced in the absolute concomitance of subjectification and desubjectification, self-loss and self-possession, servitude and sovereignty” (107).

     In Levi, we find “the impossible dialectic between the survivor and the Muselmann” (120): “Who is the subject of testimony?” A zone of indistinction “in which it is impossible to establish the position of the subject, to identify the ‘imagined substance’ of the ‘I’ and, along with it, the true witness” (id.).

     We see that “life bears with it a caesura that can transform all life into survival and all survival into life. […] survival designates the pure and simple continuation of bare life [cf. volume I]” (133).

     IIII – “The Archive and Testimony”

     Lotsa linguistics stuff: Benveniste, Foucault, &c. “Auschwitz represents the historical point in which these processes collapse, the devastating experience in which the impossible is forced into the real” (148). We see that the Muselmann is the “absolutely unwitnessable, invisible ark of biopower. Invisible because empty, because the Muselmann is nothing other than volkloser Raum, the empty space of people at the center of the camp” (156).

     Ultimately, “the subject of testimony” is “a remnant” (158). This is a “theologico-messianic concept” (162). Regarding the remnant, “the aporia of testimony coincides with the aporia of messianism” (163).

     “Let us indeed posit Auschwitz, that to which it is not possible to bear witness; and let us also posit the Muselmann as the absolute impossibility of bearing witness” (164).

     Recommended for those who examine the incomparable; phenomenology of heteronymic depersonalization, degree zero pseudonyms, and readers in secret solidarity with the Arcanum Imperii. ”

      Portraits of Our Lost Humanity; may the seas of time return us to ourselves and those we love.

     Fragments of myself, lost long ago, look back at me in these images, and I no longer know which of us is which, nor how love transposes us with others and transcends the limits of our form.

     But I know these things are true, for in such images I re-enact as mimesis the shattering of myself under love’s hammer; broken open to Otherness and a larger universe into which one may grow as exaltation, rapture, adaptation, change, reimagination and transformation, and metamorphosis.

     Never be afraid to be destroyed and recreated.

     Thus saith the Caterpillar. Of the redemptive power of love as the only means of escape from the recursive forces of fear, power, and force I have written often; so also with the primary and defining struggle of becoming human between those truths written in our flesh and the falsification of authorized identities.

     We were lost to each other when fate trapped us on opposite sides of the Berlin Wall during a firefight with the KGB, though we triumphed in the end when we brought down the Wall to set her and all its captive peoples free. 

      A note in a bottle, then, cast upon unknown seas, to Dances With Crows: 

     Should you chance upon this, against impossible odds like so much of our adventures, whomever you now may be; I hope your life has belonged to you alone, to find joy as you so wish, and so for all of us.

May 15 2025 On This Anniversary of Nakba Day, Choose Love Over Hate and Solidarity Over Division

     With last year’s United Nations declaration of Nakba Day, the historic trauma of the Palestinians and Israel’s kleptocratic imperial conquest and dominion and wars of ethnic cleansing and genocide belong not only to both sides of a divided people, but to all humankind.

     Herein we bear witness and I hope heed its warning, for fascisms of blood, faith, and soil are universal to humans as failures of solidarity and interdependence driven by fear, especially when generalized and overwhelming fear and existential threats are shaped by authority in service to power and the carceral state of force and control through division and falsification.

     No matter where you begin with hierarchies of elite belonging and exclusionary otherness, you always end up at the gates of Auschwitz.

     Why recreate a hell you have escaped from?

      Israel has learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis. Seizure of power as autonomy and self-determination, yes; but why not change the systems of unequal power, instead of trading places as tyrants rather than prisoners?

     Why has the state of Israel reconstructed not the dream of Sepharad in which all are equal regardless of faith, race, or national identity, but the nightmare of its destroyer the Spanish Empire and its ideology of limpieza enforced by Conquest and Inquisition?

      With the Inquisition and the Holocaust as the twin poles of its historical identity, and as imposed conditions of struggle, Israel has achieved a space of relative safety at the cost of becoming a wholly militarized society united by blood and faith. But security is an illusion, because state terror and fear beyond hope create their own counterforce as resistance and revolution.

      Fear is not the only means of exchange, nor power the only thing which has meaning.

      Palestine and Israel are one people divided by history. Of memory, history, and the struggle between the masks that others make for us as authorized identities in service to power by those who would enslave us and those we make for ourselves, of falsification versus truths written in our flesh, this I say; only the redemptive power of love can free us from the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force.  

     There are no Israelis, no Palestinians; only people like ourselves and the choices we make about how to be human together.

      On this Nakba Day, let us mourn the collapse of moral vision and the brotherhood of all humankind which unleashed it as the Defining Moment of both Palestinian and Israeli identity, dream a better future than we have the past, and act as a United Humankind to make it real.

     Let us choose love over hate and solidarity over division.

      As written by Hamas before the October 7 events engineered by Israel through IDF infiltration and subversion agent networks within Hamas disrupted the Israel-Palestinian peace and unification movement and provided Netanyahu and his criminal settler regime a casus belli for the genocide of the Palestinians now ongoing and the imperial conquest and dominion of the whole region in a generalized conflict with Iran; “The 75th anniversary of the al-Nakba (the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people) anniversary, which comes in the aftermath of the Israeli occupation forces’ most recent aggression against the besieged Gaza strip, brings back painful memories.

     Seventy-five years have passed since the Israeli occupation of Palestine, during which the occupation forces perpetrated the most horrific crimes and massacres against the Palestinian people, who have been holding on to their land and rights.

     On this anniversary, the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas salutes the Palestinian heroic martyrs, who fell in their quest for freedom, wishes the injured speedy recovery, and hails the detainees in Israeli occupation jails. The movement states the following:

     First: The Joint Operations Chamber has consolidated the unity of the Palestinian people in their struggle for liberation against the Israeli occupation.

     Second: The Israeli occupation will never have any legitimacy or sovereignty over historic Palestine and the occupation’s endeavours to obliterate the historic features and identity of Palestine are bound to fail.

     Third: We will remain loyal to the Palestinians languishing in Israeli occupation jails and we will continue to work towards releasing them by all available means.

     Fourth: The main reason behind the great suffering of the millions of Palestinian refugees is the Israeli occupation. The Palestinian refugees’ right to return to their land, from which they were forcibly evicted, is inalienable.

     Fifth: The 75-year-long Israeli occupation of Palestine is a stain on those who remained silent and have not lifted a finger to expose the occupation’s crimes and put an end to its aggression against our people, land, and holy places.

     Sixth: We call on the international community, Arab and Muslim Ummah, and the free peoples of the world to side with the just Palestinian cause and take swift action to end all forms of aggression against the Palestinian people until they regain their rights.”

     Sadly we now know that no such international solidarity movement and policy of Boycott, Sanction, and Divestiture was realized, resulting in the Black Saturday tragedy on October 7 and the genocide of the Palestinians it unleashed.

     As written by Armani Syed in Time, in an article entitled Why the U.N. Is Commemorating Palestinian Displacement This Year; “For the first time ever, the U.N. will commemorate the Nakba, or “catastrophe” in Arabic, in which at least 700,000 Palestinians fled or were forcibly expelled from their homes during the creation of Israel in 1948.

     On May 15, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas will deliver a keynote speech at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, as part of a high-level special meeting to mark Nakba Day. In a statement outlining the event, the U.N. said the occasion aims to “highlight that the noble goals of justice and peace require recognizing the reality and history of the Palestinian people’s plight and ensuring the fulfillment of their inalienable rights.”

    As the 75th anniversary of the Nakba approached, the 193-member General Assembly voted in November on whether to host a commemoration event; the plan was approved by a vote of 90-30 with 47 abstentions. The U.S., a longtime military and financial supporter of Israel, voted against the event and confirmed that no American diplomats would be present.

     For many others, the U.N.’s decision is an acknowledgement of the central role played by the intergovernmental organization in the partition of the Mandate for Palestine.

     “It’s acknowledging the responsibility of the U.N. of not being able to resolve this catastrophe for the Palestinian people for 75 years,” said Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian U.N. ambassador, according to the Associated Press.

     Israel’s U.N. ambassador, Gilad Erdan, described the commemoration as “abominable” and called it a “blatant attempt to distort history.”

    From the early 1900s, a growing number of Zionist settlers escaping antisemitism in Europe arrived in the Mandate for Palestine. During the 1920s and 1930s, Palestinians resisted displacement that had been enabled by the British colonial presence. British forces eventually tasked the U.N. with finding a solution.

     In 1947, the U.N. General Assembly, formed of 57 member states at the time, passed a resolution to divide the Mandate for Palestine into a Jewish state and a Palestinian one. The plan allocated more than half the country to the Jewish state at a time when Jews formed around one-third of the population. The plan would also have left around 500,000 Palestinians living in a future Jewish state with a drastic choice: remain a minority in a Jewish state or leave.

     Palestinians rejected the proposal and when the British mandate expired in 1948, Israel declared its independence.

     Fighting broke out and 5 Arab countries—Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, and Syria—deployed forces to stem the flow of Palestinian refugees. The aftermath of the fighting saw Israel conquer additional land that the U.N. plan had earmarked for a Palestinian state, while Egypt and Jordan each retained control over the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, respectively.

     Over time, the Israel took control of more land that was formerly designated by the U.N. as part of a future Palestinian state. After the June 1967 War between Israel and a coalition of Arab states, Israel occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

     In recent decades, Israeli settlements in the West Bank have expanded under successive governments, with the settler population surpassing half a million people earlier this year. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, and much of the international community see them as an obstacle to peace and a future Palestinian state.

     This year, Nakba Day is being observed on the heels of a round of violence between Israel and Palestinian militant groups. Israeli airstrikes which intended to target key figures from Islamic Jihad, the second-largest Palestinian armed group in Gaza, claimed at least 33 Palestinian lives. Meanwhile, Palestinian militant groups fired as many as 800 rockets toward Israel, leading to the death of two people in Israel.

     “The catastrophe to the Palestinian people is still ongoing,” Mansour said, adding that Palestinians are still being “forcibly removed” from their homes.”

Arabic

15 مايو 2025 يوم النكبة

      مع إعلان الأمم المتحدة يوم النكبة ، فإن الصدمة التاريخية للفلسطينيين وغزو إسرائيل للتطهير العرقي لا تخص كلا الجانبين من الشعب المنقسم فحسب ، بل للبشرية جمعاء.

      هنا نشهد وآمل أن ألتفت إلى تحذيره ، لأن فاشية الدم والإيمان والتربة عالمية للبشر كفشل في التضامن والاعتماد المتبادل مدفوعًا بالخوف ، خاصةً عندما يتشكل الخوف المعمم والشامل والتهديدات الوجودية من خلال السلطة في خدمة القوة والحالة الجسدية للقوة والسيطرة من خلال الانقسام والتزوير.

      بغض النظر عن المكان الذي تبدأ فيه التسلسلات الهرمية من الانتماء النخبوي والآخر الإقصائي ، ينتهي بك الأمر دائمًا عند أبواب أوشفيتز.

      لماذا تعيد خلق الجحيم الذي هربت منه؟

       لقد تعلمت إسرائيل الدروس الخاطئة من النازيين. نعم ، الاستيلاء على السلطة باعتباره استقلالية وتقرير مصير ؛ ولكن لماذا لا نغير أنظمة القوة غير المتكافئة ، بدلاً من تداول الأماكن على أنها طاغية لا أسرى؟

      لماذا لم تعيد دولة إسرائيل بناء حلم سيفاراد الذي يتساوى فيه الجميع بغض النظر عن العقيدة أو العرق أو الهوية الوطنية ، ولكن كابوس مدمرها الإمبراطورية الإسبانية وأيديولوجية ليمبيزا التي فرضها الفتح ومحاكم التفتيش؟

       مع محاكم التفتيش والهولوكوست كقطبين مزدوجين لهويتها التاريخية ، وكشروط كفاح مفروضة ، حققت إسرائيل مساحة من الأمان النسبي على حساب أن تصبح مجتمعًا عسكريًا بالكامل متحدًا بالدم والإيمان. لكن الأمن وهم ، لأن إرهاب الدولة والخوف الذي يفوق الأمل يخلقان قوتهما المضادة كمقاومة وثورة.

       ليس الخوف هو الوسيلة الوحيدة للتبادل ، ولا القوة الشيء الوحيد الذي له معنى.

       في يوم النكبة هذا ، دعونا نحزن على انهيار الرؤية الأخلاقية والأخوة بين البشرية جمعاء ، الأمر الذي أطلق العنان لها باعتبارها اللحظة المحددة للهوية الفلسطينية والإسرائيلية ، ونحلم بمستقبل أفضل مما كان لدينا في الماضي ، ونتصرف كإنسان موحد. لجعلها حقيقية.

Hebrew

15 במאי 2025 יום הנכבה

      עם הכרזת יום הנכבה של האו”ם, הטראומה ההיסטורית של הפלסטינים וכיבוש הטיהור האתני של ישראל שייכים לא רק לשני הצדדים של עם מפולג, אלא לכל המין האנושי.

      כאן אנו מעידים ואני מקווה להקשיב לאזהרתה, שכן פשיזם של דם, אמונה ואדמה הם אוניברסליים לבני אדם ככישלונות של סולידריות ותלות הדדית המונעים על ידי פחד, במיוחד כאשר פחד מוכלל ומכריע ואיומים קיומיים מעוצבים על ידי סמכות בשירות למען כוח ומצב קרסראלי של כוח ושליטה באמצעות חלוקה וזיוף.

      לא משנה היכן אתה מתחיל עם היררכיות של השתייכות עילית ואחרות מדריגה, אתה תמיד מגיע בשערי אושוויץ.

      למה לשחזר גיהנום שממנו נמלטת?

       ישראל למדה את הלקחים הלא נכונים מהנאצים. תפיסת השלטון כאוטונומיה והגדרה עצמית, כן; אבל למה לא לשנות את מערכות הכוח הלא שוויוניות, במקום לסחור במקומות כרודן ולא שבוי?

      מדוע מדינת ישראל לא שיחזרה את החלום של ספרד שבו כולם שווים ללא הבדל אמונה, גזע או זהות לאומית, אלא את הסיוט של ההורסת שלה את האימפריה הספרדית ואת האידיאולוגיה של לימפיזה שנאכפת על ידי הכיבוש והאינקוויזיציה?

       עם האינקוויזיציה והשואה כצמד הקטבים התאומים לזהותה ההיסטורית, וכתנאי מאבק מוטלים, ישראל השיגה מרחב של ביטחון יחסי במחיר של הפיכתה לחברה צבאית לחלוטין המאוחדת בדם ואמונה. אבל ביטחון הוא אשליה, כי טרור המדינה ופחד מעבר לתקווה יוצרים כוח נגדי משלהם כהתנגדות ומהפכה.

       פחד אינו האמצעי היחיד להחלפה, ולא כוח הדבר היחיד שיש לו משמעות.

       ביום הנכבה הזה, הבה נתאבל על קריסת החזון המוסרי ואחוות האנושות כולה ששחררו אותו כרגע המכונן של הזהות הפלסטינית והישראלית כאחד, ונחלום עתיד טוב יותר ממה שהיה לנו בעבר, ונפעל כמין אנושי מאוחד. כדי שזה יהיה אמיתי.

The continuous Nakba’: Palestinians decry perpetual suffering

Farha film trailer/Netflix

Nakba Day: What happened in Palestine in 1948? | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/5/15/nakba-mapping-palestinian-villages-destroyed-by-israel-in-1948

Seventy+ Years of Suffocation | Amnesty International

https://nakba.amnesty.org/en/

Why the U.N. Is Commemorating the Palestinian Nakba | Time

https://time.com/6279800/united-nations-nakba-palestinians/

Why the Director of Netflix’s Farha Depicted the Murder of a Palestinian Family

https://time.com/6238964/darin-sallam-farha-netflix-interview/

The Palestinian Nakba: What Happened in 1948 and Why It Still Matters | Middle East Institute

https://www.mei.edu/events/palestinian-nakba-what-happened-1948-and-why-it-still-matters

Ten Facts You Need To Know About The Palestinian Nakba | BDS Movement

https://bdsmovement.net/news/ten-facts-you-need-know-about-palestinian-nakba

Jeremy Corbyn: Unite to end the Nakba | Progressive International

https://progressive.international/wire/2023-05-15-jeremy-corbyn-unite-to-end-the-nakba/en

Remembering the Nakba: Israeli group puts 1948 Palestine back on the map

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/02/nakba-israel-palestine-zochrot-history

The Nakba’s Coming Stages: Patterns, Process, and Predictability

https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/the-nakbas-coming-stages-patterns-process-and-predictability/

May 15 2025 Anniversary of Bloody Thursday Berkeley 1969: Love, Magic, and Political Awakening Amid the Most Massive and Terrible Incident of Police Terror in American History

     In this time of melting glaciers and dying seas, of drought and scarcity of drinking water, of burning rainforests and species extinctions, of acid rain and clouds of poison gas, of humankind drowning in our own wastes of greed and vanity and taking everything else with us, of fascist tyranny and state terror, of the horrors of imperial conquest and wars of dominion which threaten us with nuclear annihilation and the abandonment of the principle of human rights, I find myself reflecting not on the inevitability of our failure but instead on the hope of our defiance of those who would sell us into oblivion.

     And so I write to offer you a fragment of protective magic from my childhood and family history; but first the truth of the peril and existential crisis we face today. 

     As I wrote of biodiversity and extinction in my post of May 13 2019; Earth is an Ark hurtling through space, filled with precious life among chasms of emptiness.

     How shall we answer this nothingness?  Will it be with wisdom in maintaining the balance of life in all its subtle and glorious interconnectedness, diversity, and beauty, a dance of joy and of love?

     Or will we be defeated and consumed by our own vanity and greed, surrendering to the dark and to despair and turning all we have or ever will into profit until there is nothing left, not water to drink nor air to breathe, and the last of us die with inarticulate brute cries, bloated in toadlike satiation and trumpeting our splendid dominance and rulership of the world?

     We must choose who we are to become, we humans; stewards of our homeworld and of one another, or destroyers. Can we find a path forward in coexistence, or will we allow our appetites and desires to drive us to suicidal ruin? For we have but two choices of futures in this; we will be Lightbringers, or we will annihilate ourselves.

      So I wrote among my celebrations of May Day and the coming of spring. I write today not to prophecy apocalypse, but to hold before us hope of redemption. Of Extinction Rebellion and the Green New Deal, of the abolition of police and carceral states, and of solidarity which bridges authorized identities and divisions in seizures of power and revolutionary struggle against those who would enslave us I have written much and will do so again; but I promised magic, and you shall have it.

     As recounted in Lions Roar; ‘In 1969, poet Gary Snyder wrote his “Smokey the Bear Sutra,” imagining Smokey as the Great Sun Buddha giving a discourse, in the style of a Buddhist sutra. Fifty years later, the message of the sutra continues to resonate.”

      I first heard it, a song of shining truth and the incorruptible redemptive power of love, sung by my mother and the women who joined hands in a circle of protection between the protestors holding signs and flowers and the guns of the riot police during the summer of my Awakening to political awareness.

     Gary Snyder had distributed copies of his poem at the February 1969 Sierra Club Wilderness Conference, which were in the hands of the protesters who occupied People’s Park in Berkeley to rally in support of the people of Palestine and demand divestiture of investment in Israeli injustices by the University of California system and our government, just in time for Bloody Thursday on May 15, when his words were the only shield against the shotgun blasts- lethal rounds with multiple shot the size of 38 caliber bullets which had been loaded with intent to kill- fired at random into the crowd by the police.

      Of the six thousand protesters at the scene of what has been called the most violent incident of state terror in American history, only 111 of the victims reached the safety of hospitals. There has never been a full accounting of Bloody Thursday.

     I remember my mother smiling and reaching out to a policeman offering a handful of flowers, and he pumped and aimed a shotgun at her in reply. Is it truly so threatening, a bouquet of flowers, to our systems of unequal power, to patriarchy, to white supremacy, to capitalism, to the carceral state? I have no explanation for how we survived the next few moments. I’d like to think he hesitated to murder for no reason a beautiful woman, with flaming red hair and skin pale as rice powder, fearless and kind and with imperious hazel eyes and a boy less than ten years old at her side, even that she had been identified and orders issued not to shoot a notable academic, surely the greatest scholar of Coleridge and symbolism in medieval religious art of her time and a psychologist and biologist as well as an author of children’s books. But no; chance intervened in the form of a policeman who at that moment threw a grenade into the crowd. There was a flash of light and thunder, like God’s head being split open with a hammer, and all devolved into chaos and death. Time resumed as the crowd fled and policemen fired at our backs; still we escaped harm.

     The moment of my true birth was that in which I stood outside of time, beyond death, and held the universe within me.

     The force wave of the detonations cast my consciousness from my body, like the shadows etched on the walls of Hiroshima, momentarily dead and in a vision of our possible alternate futures become a vessel of fate, bearer of a terrible awareness that we live on the cusp of decision of an age of tyranny, six to eight centuries of fascist and theocratic prison-states, wars and genocides, ending with the extinction of humankind.

     I returned from death in my mother’s arms, and said; “Don’t be afraid. Death is nothing; nothing but Awakening from an illusion.”

     This is why I have learned to read our futures in current events as civilizational choices we make, as adaptations to threats and to change, through the methods of literary criticism, history, psychology, and philosophy; because ours is a time of Rashomon Gate Events which can doom or save us, for our actions have consequences globally and for all of us, and if we are to escape the fall of civilization and our extinction we must reimagine and transform ourselves.

     What happened next? Governor Ronald Reagan unleashed 2,700 soldiers of the National Guard, who joined the Alameda County Sheriffs, in effect a mercenary force who had donned Halloween masks and discarded their badges, in a two week campaign of repression that included bombing the entire city from helicopters with tear gas. When informed of the elementary school children who were hospitalized as a result, he said; “Once the dogs of war have been unleashed, you must expect things will happen, and that people, being human, will make mistakes on both sides.”

     In all of this, I remembered the great spell of love and nonviolence which heralded my Awakening and may have saved the lives of my mother and myself among others.

     As to family history and the origins of Smokey the Bear as a protective spirit,  my aunt Betty invented Smokey the Bear as a character to represent our duty of stewardship of nature during her career in the U.S. Forest Service, named for an actual bear cub raised by herself among other forest rangers and Native Americans together because its mother had died in a forest fire. As the USFS mascot and spokesman, he became the image of one of most successful marketing campaigns in history and a universal symbol which belongs to us all.

     I hope that he will continue to protect all of us and our planet, and to remind us to live in harmony with each other and our fellow beings as companions on a great journey. So, here follows the Smokey the Bear Sutra:

     “Once in the Jurassic, about 150 million years ago, the Great Sun Buddha in this corner of the Infinite Void gave a great Discourse to all the assembled elements and energies: to the standing beings, the walking beings, the flying beings, and the sitting beings—even grasses, to the number of thirteen billion, each one born from a seed, were assembled there: a Discourse concerning Enlightenment on the planet Earth.

 “In some future time, there will be a continent called America. It will have great centers of power called such as Pyramid Lake, Walden Pond, Mt. Rainier, Big Sur, Everglades, and so forth; and powerful nerves and channels such as Columbia River, Mississippi River, and Grand Canyon. The human race in that era will get into troubles all over its head, and practically wreck everything in spite of its own strong intelligent Buddha-nature.”

“The twisting strata of the great mountains and the pulsings of great volcanoes are my love burning deep in the earth. My obstinate compassion is schist and basalt and granite, to be mountains, to bring down the rain. In that future American Era I shall enter a new form: to cure the world of loveless knowledge that seeks with blind hunger; and mindless rage eating food that will not fill it.”

And he showed himself in his true form of

SMOKEY THE BEAR.

A handsome smokey-colored brown bear standing on his hind legs, showing that he is aroused and watchful.

Bearing in his right paw the Shovel that digs to the truth beneath appearances; cuts the roots of useless attach­ments, and flings damp sand on the fires of greed and war;

His left paw in the Mudra of Comradely Display—indicating that all creatures have the full right to live to their limits and that deer, rabbits, chipmunks, snakes, dandelions, and lizards all grow in the realm of the Dharma;

Wearing the blue work overalls symbolic of slaves and laborers, the countless men oppressed by a civilization that claims to save but only destroys;

Wearing the broad-brimmed hat of the West, symbolic of the forces that guard the Wilderness, which is the Natural State of the Dharrna and the True Path of man on earth: all true paths lead through mountains—

With a halo of smoke and flame behind, the forest fires of the Kali-yuga, fires caused by the stupidity of those who think things can be gained and lost whereas in truth all is contained vast and free in the Blue Sky and Green Earth of One Mind;

Round-bellied to show his kind nature and that the great earth has food enough for everyone who loves her and trusts her;

Trampling underfoot wasteful freeways and needless suburbs; smashing the worms of capitalism and totalitarianism;

Indicating the Task: his followers, becoming free of cars, houses, canned food, universities, and shoes, master the Three Mysteries of their own Body, Speech, and Mind; and fearlessly chop down the rotten trees and prune out the sick limbs of this country America and then burn the leftover trash.

Wrathful but Calm, Austere but Comic, Smokey the Bear will Illuminate those who would help him; but for those who would hinder or slander him,

HE WILL PUT THEM OUT.

Thus his great Mantra:

Namah samanta vajranam chanda maharoshana Sphataya hum traka ham mam

“I DEDICATE MYSELF TO THE UNIVERSAL DIAMOND BE THIS RAGING FURY DESTROYED”

And he will protect those who love woods and rivers, Gods and animals, hobos and madmen, prisoners and sick people, musicians, playful women, and hopeful children;

And if anyone is threatened by advertising, air pollution, or the police, they should chant SMOKEY THE BEAR’S WAR SPELL

DROWN THEIR BUTTS

CRUSH THEIR BUTTS

DROWN THEIR BUTTS

CRUSH THEIR BUTTS

And SMOKEY THE BEAR will surely appear to put the enemy out with his vajra-shovel,

Now those who recite this Sutra and then try to put it in practice will accumulate merit as countless as the sands of Arizona and Nevada,

Will help save the planet Earth from total oil slick,

Will enter the age of harmony of man and nature,

Will win the tender love and caresses of men, women, and beasts

Will always have ripe blackberries to eat and a sunny spot under a pine to sit at,

AND IN THE END WILL WIN HIGHEST PERFECT ENLIGHTENMENT.

thus have we heard.”

     A sovereign and independent Palestine and all humankind, throughout the world and our future, as imagined by its people only, with the UN and in future a United Humankind as guarantor of our universal human rights and a free society of equals; for this dream I have struggled for fifty six years now since my first death, of moments only from the concussive pressure wave of a police grenade when I was nine as Reagan ordered the police to open fire on the student divestiture from Israel protests, Bloody Thursday May 15 1969 in People’s Park Berkeley; and as my consciousness was hurled out of my body I stood beyond time and lived myriads of possible futures extending through millennia of alternate timelines and universes.

      I hope that we choose love over fear, power, and force, now in this moment when the fate of humankind balances between liberty and tyranny, and that we are not still merely hoping that solidarity may one day triumph over division fifty years from now, or fifty thousand, but now begin its realization, here in this museum of holocausts both public and private which is our world, this Theatre of Cruelty which is Gaza, Ukraine, America, and the other theatres of World War Three, the concentration camps for migrants at our border, the kidnapping gangs called ICE and the campaign of repression of dissent on our university campuses, endless litanies of woe throughout the world as the humanity is ground out of us by systems of oppression and unequal power, and this museum of tyranny and terror which is Vichy America held captive of the Trump regime’s Fourth Reich and its legitimation of theocratic patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror.

     May peace be upon us all.

Reproduced from the Summer 1970 issue of Wind Bell, where it appeared with the note, “May be reproduced free forever.”

                  Bloody Thursday, a reading list

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jul/06/the-battle-for-peoples-park-berkeley-1969-review-vietnam

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/flashback-ronald-reagan-and-the-berkeley-peoples-park-riots-114873/

https://www.rt.com/usa/343123-reagan-berkeley-park-riot

https://archive.org/details/canhpra_000027

https://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2004-04-20/article/18700

http://www.peoplespark.org/wp/

https://sfist.com/2019/05/15/50-years-ago-today-the-battle-for-berkeleys-peoples-park-became-bloody-thursday/

https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/spring-2021/the-editorial-that-split-the-daily-cal

https://www.thefreelibrary.com/People’s+park%3a+birth+and+survival.-a0245805621

May 14 2025 America Falls With Our Failure of Empathy, Abandonment of Our Universal Human Rights, Cowardice in Confronting Evil, and Complicity in Genocide: Anniversary of Israel’s 2024 Rafah Campaign

      This first anniversary of the Rafah Campaign’s launch by Israel, and of Genocide Joe once again making us all complicit in Israel’s war crimes and abandoning the idea of universal human rights here in America, finds us in exactly the same horrible position under the Trump regime as Israel begins the annihilation of Gaza.

     Those who would enslave us and the hegemonic elites whom they truly represent dance and caper for our diversion in performances of democracy which are illusionary and an opiate which captures us in the sleep of reason designed to manufacture consent to be subjugated, falsified, commodified, and dehumanized; for through the lens of Gaza Biden and Trump are masks our captors don to confuse us and steal our humanity and our souls. Beyond the stories they tell and the siren songs they sing, was there ever any real difference between Republican and Democratic Parties as organizations of informal power and control, or between democracy and tyranny?

      I hope that one day, in some unimaginable future which I cannot foresee, we can dream such impossible dreams as a free society of equals, and make it real.

      This will do nothing to help the children whose deaths our taxes buy in Palestine or the Ukrainians whose heroic stand for liberty we have betrayed.

     Gaza and Mariupol are both studies in the doctrine of Total War designed by Franco and Hitler and tested at Guernica; but only one of these are paid for by American taxes.

      There may be ideological differences between Trump and Biden and between the Republican and Democratic Parties, but not where it matters, regarding our humanity.

     May we dream better futures than we have our pasts, claw back something of our humanity from the darkness, and seize our stolen souls from those who would enslave us.

     As I wrote on this day last year; Genocide Joe has sent his billion dollar arms gift to Israel back to congress for review, having admitted the true purpose of the two thousand pound city destroying bombs, but seems to imagine the tanks as defensive weapons, having forgotten the Blitzkrieg.

     This as Israel invades Rafah in defiance of his Red Line against sending aid for the mass murders of the Palestinian refugees Israel has herded there, while in America the brutal repression of dissent on universities by student peace and divestiture protesters unfolds as state terror in recapitulation of the Vietnam War, though as yet we have no parallel with the Kent State Massacre.

      If nothing else, the atrocities of the Gaza War have exposed the truths and  monstrosities behind America’s historical role as patron of Israel’s imperial conquest and dominion of Palestine and its seventy years of genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, and the unchecked power of a rapacious and kleptocratic state of theocracy and racism which we have authorized.

     America Falls with our failure of empathy, abandonment of our universal human rights, cowardice in confronting evil, and complicity in genocide.

      As Tolstoy and Lenin asked with such very different results, What is to be done?

      As written by Osita Nwanevu in The Guardian, in an article entitled US students, once again, have led the way. Now we must all stand up for Palestinians: Campus protests in solidarity with the people of Gaza have braved abuse and police raids but history will be kinder; “The student left is the most reliably correct constituency in America. Over the past 60 years, it has passed every great moral test American foreign policy has forced upon the public, including the Vietnam war, the question of relations with apartheid South Africa, and the Iraq war. Student activists were at the heart of the black civil rights movement from the very beginning. To much derision and abuse, they pushed for more rights, protections and respect for women and queer people on their campuses than the wider world was long willing to provide. And over the past 20 years in particular, policymakers have arrived belatedly to stances on economic inequality, climate change, drug policy and criminal justice that putative radicals on campus took up long before them.

     They have not always been right; even when right, their prescriptions for the problems they’ve identified and their means of directing attention to them have not always been prudent. But time and time and time again, the student left in America has squarely faced and expressed truths our politicians and all the eminent and eloquent voices of moderation in the press, in all of their supposed wisdom and good sense, have been unable or unwilling to see. Straining against an ancient and immortal prejudice against youth, it has made a habit of telling the American people, in tones that discomfit, what they need to hear before they are ready to hear it.

     Only later, after the teargas clears and the leering and laughter subside, do we sit puzzled, in the filth of our own entirely avoidable mistakes, and look regretfully backward. Books are written. Documentaries are made. Plaques are installed. At Kent State, a plaza overlooking the university’s commons was constructed to honor the four students the Ohio national guard killed there in 1970. It’s bounded, the university’s website says, by “a jagged, abstract border symbolic of disruptions and the conflict of ideas.” There are daffodils. “Inquire, Learn, Reflect,” an inscription reads. One thing visitors might reflect on is that a Gallup poll taken not long after the shootings found that 58% of Americans believed that anti-war activists had, perhaps in the unrest of the preceding days, brought the deaths at Kent State upon themselves. Today, more than half a century after the fact, we mourn them. We have regrets.

     What will we regret the most about the last few weeks? Which responses to the Gaza protests will linger the longest in our minds? CNN’s comparison of the campus protests to the persecution of Jews “during the 1930s in Europe”, perhaps? The University of Virginia changing its policy on tents to justify the deployment of more force against its students than it called for against the actual Nazis who marched on its campus and killed a woman seven years ago? The New York police department presenting to the press, as proof that outside agitators had organized the occupation of a building at Columbia, a book about the causes of terrorism written by a historian and a bike chain Columbia had been selling to its students? The outside funding actually raised by pro-Israel counter-protesters at UCLA who beat up and threw fireworks at students and faculty as campus and LAPD officers stood by?

     Whenever all of this ends ⁠– whenever we find ourselves ready to survey what’s left of Gaza and its people and ask whether we could have done more to prevent the use of our weapons and our money in their destruction ⁠– what will we have to say for ourselves? When the talking heads are assembled to offer voiceovers atop footage of police grappling and tackling students and faculty whose voices, it will be painfully obvious to most by then, should have been heeded, what words of useless contrition will be offered?

     There have been real instances of antisemitism on campuses since the protests began; here and there we’ve seen real instances of malevolence and idiocy. But to believe, on the basis of anecdata, that hatred and ignorance have motivated the vast majority of students who’ve set up encampments and other pro-Palestinian protests over the last month ⁠– in their many thousands at well over 100 colleges and universities in all but four states ⁠– is to believe what can only be described as an extraordinary propaganda campaign, one pushed by critics in the press and in office who can’t seem to agree on what the protesters are like. These students, we’ve been told, are both popular and unpopular among their peers. They are both ugly and chic. They are fragile and cold-blooded, pathetically soft and remarkably violent. They hate Jews. They are Jews who hate themselves. They’ve exercised both too little message discipline and too much caution with the press at demonstrations that are both laughably chaotic and suspiciously organized. And whoever they are and whatever’s spurred them into action, the students are, clearly, in need of either a good sock to the mouth or a good lay ⁠– the better to focus their attention away from politics and on their studies, on political matters close to home rather than halfway across the world, or political matters halfway across the world more deserving of their attention, like the plight of the suffering in China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Sudan, Iran or Azerbaijan.

     No one with their eyes on Gaza denies that there are many bad things happening in the world at any given time. None of those who’ve troubled law- and opinion-makers so with their insistence that the Palestinians are people would argue that the Palestinians are the only suffering people on the globe. But they are suffering largely as a consequence of American foreign policy. On Wednesday, President Biden announced that the United States will freeze the supply of offensive weaponry to Israel if it continues with the full invasion of Rafah, an announcement that follows admissions that the campaign being waged in Gaza, with our bombs, has thus far been waged with dubious military objectives and with insufficient regard for civilian life.

     The guilty parties here include not only our political leaders but our private institutions, our colleges among them

     What the White House has yet to admit, though, is that the nearly 35,000 Palestinians who have been killed and the 1.9 million Palestinians who have been displaced over the last seven months are the victims not only of this particular war and the logic of collective responsibility for the massacres of 7 October being deployed by Israeli leaders, but the willingness of this country to sanction Israel’s denial of Palestinian human rights for decades. And the guilty parties here include not only our political leaders but our private institutions, our colleges among them, which, through the investments they have sustained in Israel and the arms manufacturers supplying its war, have rendered themselves complicit in wrongs that should trouble us as deeply as apartheid in South Africa now does. Nothing should surprise us about the fact that Israel now faces similar divestment campaigns; after weeks of moaning and groaning that the demands of student protesters have been unexpressed, unclear or impossible to meet, multiple colleges have, in fact, made certain concessions to them and announced plans to take further demands into consideration. Encampments at Brown, Northwestern, Rutgers and the University of Minnesota were voluntarily disbanded on that basis.

     But it should also be unsurprising that far more colleges have responded to student demonstrators by calling in the authorities ⁠– an authorization of force prefigured by the remarkable crackdowns on pro-Palestinian speech we’ve seen at institutions across the country since October. One of the perversities of the situation is that despite all this, we probably haven’t heard the last about our “woke universities” ⁠– as they have for more than a hundred years, the right and centrists who share their contempt for college students will, against all available evidence, continue insisting that American campuses have been ideologically captured by the very people we’ve just witnessed campus administrators go to war against. They will do all they can to obscure it, but it should be plain now that all the shallow representation most visible to pundits⁠ – the diversity and equity teams, the minorities in high positions ⁠– hasn’t changed the fact that the majority of American universities are largely beholden to donors, trustees and, increasingly, politicians, well to the right of the most progressive voices on campus.

     In the months ahead, many on the left will surely call upon universities to hold true to their commitments to open discourse and redress the censorship and harassment of Israel’s critics. They should. But we should also resist the flight to abstraction ⁠– dishwatery invocations of free speech, murky and lukewarm, that no one ever seems to really mean and that function chiefly as bulwarks against substantive debate. The dignity of the Palestinian people and their right to resist their oppression plainly aren’t chief among the dangerous and controversial ideas we’ve heard so much about protecting over the last decade; we cannot rely upon the putatively neutral authorities and institutions that have done so much to suppress them to act now in their defense on abstract grounds. So it goes. The job now, as the Israelis press into Rafah, is to change public opinion ⁠on the actual matter at hand – to make urgent arguments to the American public not about the plight of Palestine’s defenders on campus but the plight of the Palestinians. The students have done their part; they will be recognized in time. Now it’s up to the rest of us.”  

US students, once again, have led the way. Now we must all stand up for Palestinians

US advances $1bn Israel weapons package amid Rafah tensions

Package in congressional review process after Biden delayed shipment of bombs over fears they would be used to attack Rafah

Israeli tanks reach residential areas as IDF pushes further into Rafah

Witnesses report clashes in streets after seeing tanks cross strategically important Salah al-Din road

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/14/israeli-tanks-residential-areas-idf-push-further-rafah

At least eight Israeli strikes on Gaza aid groups since October, says report

Human Rights Watch says warnings were not issued before attacks, which have killed or injured dozens

‘Man-made starvation’: the obstacles to Gaza aid deliveries – visual guide

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/22/obstacles-to-gaza-aid-deliveries-visual-guide

‘A new abyss’: Gaza and the hundred years’ war on Palestine – podcast

While much has changed since 7 October, the horrific events of the past six months are not unique, and do not stand outside history

Losing the Fight for a Better World Takes a Toll

https://jacobin.com/2024/05/defeat-politics-burnout-book-review/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0nMHK_yDG3KDDmyXRQk4dAd5cVtDYSrd7NsDruegBRauypKgR_cIqaE68_aem_AalP_OeW2MH-KMbwFVAHpxHbeZLgDDtb3T8peu3Ru4L7U-PESHASCM5EOrtk6Al7T2rFwtO6fSucGRwOAhTuUNL9

Arabic

14 مايو 2024 أمريكا تسقط بفشلنا في التعاطف، والتخلي عن حقوقنا الإنسانية العالمية، والجبن في مواجهة الشر، والتواطؤ في الإبادة الجماعية: بدء الهجوم الإسرائيلي على رفح

      أرسل جو هدية الأسلحة التي تبلغ قيمتها مليار دولار إلى إسرائيل إلى الكونجرس لمراجعتها، بعد أن اعترف بالغرض الحقيقي لتدمير القنابل في المدينة التي يبلغ وزنها ألفي رطل، ولكن يبدو أنه يتخيل الدبابات كأسلحة دفاعية، بعد أن نسي الحرب الخاطفة.

      يأتي هذا في الوقت الذي تغزو فيه إسرائيل رفح في تحدٍ لخطه الأحمر ضد إرسال المساعدات لعمليات القتل الجماعي للاجئين الفلسطينيين الذين تحشدهم إسرائيل هناك، بينما يتكشف في أمريكا القمع الوحشي للمعارضة في الجامعات من خلال السلام الطلابي والمتظاهرين على سحب الاستثمارات باعتباره إرهاب دولة في تلخيص لإسرائيل. حرب فيتنام، على الرغم من أنه ليس لدينا حتى الآن أي تشابه مع مذبحة ولاية كينت.

       إذا لم يكن هناك شيء آخر، فقد كشفت الفظائع التي ارتكبت في حرب غزة عن الحقائق والفظائع الكامنة وراء الدور التاريخي الذي لعبته أمريكا كراعية للغزو الإمبريالي الإسرائيلي لفلسطين وهيمنتها وسبعين عامًا من الإبادة الجماعية والتطهير العرقي والجرائم ضد الإنسانية، والقوة غير المقيدة لإسرائيل. حالة الثيوقراطية والعنصرية الجشعة والكلبتوقراطية التي سمحنا بها.

      إن أميركا تسقط بفشلنا في التعاطف، والتخلي عن حقوقنا الإنسانية العالمية، والجبن في مواجهة الشر، والتواطؤ في الإبادة الجماعية.

       وكما تساءل تولستوي ولينين بنتائج مختلفة تمامًا، ما الذي يجب فعله؟

Hebrew

14 במאי 2024 אמריקה נופלת עם כישלוננו באמפתיה, נטישת זכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו, פחדנות בהתמודדות עם הרוע ושותפות ברצח עם: התקפת ישראל ברפיח מתחילה

      רצח העם ג’ו שלח את מתנת הנשק שלו של מיליארד דולר לישראל בחזרה לביקורת בקונגרס, לאחר שהודה במטרה האמיתית של עיריית אלפיים לירות השמדת פצצות, אבל נראה שהוא מדמיין את הטנקים כנשק הגנתי, לאחר ששכח את הבליצקריג.

      זאת כאשר ישראל פולשת לרפיח בהתרסה לקו האדום שלו נגד שליחת סיוע לרציחות ההמוניות של הפליטים הפלסטינים שישראל עדרה שם, בעוד שבאמריקה הדיכוי האכזרי של מחלוקות על האוניברסיטאות על ידי מפגיני שלום סטודנטים ומפגיני ביטול ביטול מתגלה כטרור ממלכתי בסיכום של מלחמת וייטנאם, אם כי עדיין אין לנו מקבילה לטבח במדינת קנט.

       אם שום דבר אחר, הזוועות של מלחמת עזה חשפו את האמיתות והמפלצות שמאחורי תפקידה ההיסטורי של אמריקה כפטרונית של הכיבוש הקיסרי והשליטה של ישראל על פלסטין ושבעים שנות רצח עם, טיהור אתני, פשעים נגד האנושות והכוח הבלתי מבוקש של מצב דורס וקלפטוקרטי של תיאוקרטיה וגזענות שאישרנו.

      אמריקה נופלת עם כישלון האמפתיה שלנו, נטישת זכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו, פחדנות בהתמודדות עם הרוע ושותפות ברצח עם.

       כפי ששאלו טולסטוי ולנין בתוצאות כה שונות, מה יש לעשות

May 14 2025 Impeachment of Traitor Trump Begins

      We celebrate today the presentation before Congress of Articles of Impeachment for Traitor Trump; that this is the third such attempt to hold the monster accountable under the law does nothing to diminish the triumph and historical Rashomon Gate Event of this victory of the people over a mad idiot grifter and enemy agent who would be king, and make all of us subjects rather than citizens.

     While the grand spectacles of tyranny and liberty play out on the stage of Congress and the history of the world like a kind of gladiatorial arena in which the soul of America is broken or forged, of questionable value as revolutionary struggle considering the failures of the first two impeachments, the fascist infiltration of the Supreme Court, and the stacked deck of our legislature, but a performance very useful to those in power and the elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege they truly represent in offering the masses an illusion of control and democracy, what can we ourselves do to bring a Reckoning to Trump and all those who would enslave us?

     As I wrote in my post of November 8 2024, Elegy For the Fall of America;      In the wake of the Fall of America to the Fourth Reich and the advent of the Age of Tyrants, of the obliteration of possible futures in which humankind survives the terrors and cataclysms to come, our shared public trauma, grief, and rage gathers us all together as it generates waves of consequences which will reach their limit not in the destruction of our nation, nor of our civilization throughout the world, but only in the extinction of humankind.

    We are now all of us prisoners of a madhouse run by its most brutal, degraded, perverse, and delusional inmates, the mask of the Fourth Reich which is the Republican Party, and set to enact our authorized identities and declaim our lines with gibbering whimsy by the sadistic fiend who modeled himself on Hitler, lost and won several fortunes as the kingpin of a human trafficking syndicate and launderer of Russian oligarchs secret wealth, whose mission as a Russian spy is the subversion of democracy, and worships only Moloch the Seducer, demon of lies; Our Clown of Terror and Rapist In Chief, Traitor Trump.

      This we must Resist; but how?

      First, everything the enemy says is a lie. Question, seek proof, test, and share your truths as a witness of history and a truth teller, for to become human is to pursue the truth. Perform the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen; Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority. Beware of those who claim to speak and act in your name, for this is a primary strategy of fascism. Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain. Speak, write, teach, organize. And remember always, silence is complicity.

     Second, let us act in solidarity and as guarantors of each other’s parallel and interdependent rights as citizens and universal human rights. Such action gathers momentum and becomes an unstoppable force.  

      Third, refuse to submit to authority. Never stay down, regardless of the costs, the fear and pain, ostracism and brutal repression. Claw your way out of the ruins and make yet another Last Stand, beyond hope of victory or even survival. This is our victory, for it is a power which cannot be taken from us.

       So, Resistance is asking questions, witness, and truth telling; solidarity of action, and refusal to submit.

       All Resistance is War to the Knife; those who respect no limits and no laws may hide behind none.

       Herein two warnings I give; the first is that violence and the use of social force obeys Newton’s Third Law of Motion and always operates in both directions, so you must know precisely what consequences you are trying to achieve. My question for the use of force is simple; who holds power? Not who is innocent or the victim, for as Shaw teaches us in My Fair Lady this places a moral burden of judgement on victims, and often there are no innocent. And because we must avoid the false dilemma of moral equivalence, my rule for changing the balance of unequal power is Malcolm X’s dictum; By Any Means Necessary.

      The second is to remember always Nietzsche’s principle; “He who fights against monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster in the process. And when you stare long into an abyss, the abyss also stares into you.”

Shri Thanedar Reads Out Articles Of Impeachment Against Trump On The House Floor

Mad King Trump    (Skull of an Ancestor by Geli Korzhev)

     Here follow my essays on the impeachments of Trump:

June 7 2019 Call to Bring Articles of Impeachment Against Trump

     Both hilarious and terrifying, The Articles of Impeachment Against Donald J. Trump: A Draft, By Ian Prasad Philbrick published in The New York Times June 5 2019, simply replaces a few lines here and there from the Impeachment documents of Nixon and Clinton to create a legal basis by which to hold Trump accountable for his countless crimes against America and the future of our freedom.

     In this time of darkness, depravity, and state terror, when the torch of Liberty gutters and burns low, monsters of fear and hate arising in the gathering shadows, we must join together in resistance and win a brighter future for us all.

    Is this not the beauty of human beings, as citizens and co-owners of our own government in a free society of equals; to hold fast to ourselves and each other, to resist tyranny and yield not, nor abandon our fellows, no matter the odds against us nor the cost of our freedom?

    Now is the time to call for Impeachment, regardless of party affiliation or any other differences, for all loyal Americans and their representatives in Congress to stand up and be counted, to declare for the principles embodied in our Constitution, liberty, equality, truth, justice, and the ideals of our civilization and of democracy as founded in the Forum of Athens, or be unmasked as treasonous betrayers of our oaths of office and citizenship and stand revealed and condemned as unworthy before the judgement of history.

     We must act to secure our legacy for the future and redeem the work of over two thousand years and more than 80 generations of human lives now held captive and at risk of destruction by the mad Tyrant Trump.

     Our actions in the crucible of this moment will define us forever, will exalt or brand us in the eyes of our descendants, for it is their freedom as well as our own we will now ruin or redeem.

     September 24 2019 America rediscovers its values: the impeachment of Pennywise

     Jubilation in the streets as America rediscovers its values and begins the impeachment of Pennywise, clown and cannibalistic monster who dwells beneath the human face of Trump, a mask of flesh stolen from the abducted and enslaved women in the brothels his grandfather built the Trump family fortune on during the Alaska Gold Rush, and who today carries forward the legacy of terror and misogyny he was raised with, whose election should be de-certified as the coup of a foreign power and whose Presidency has no legitimacy.

     History will remember Trump as the standard bearer of the global Fourth Reich and its assault on democracy, stealer of children for his vile and twisted purposes, author of genocidal ethnic cleansing and builder of concentration camps, pathological liar and ignorant fool, whose alliance of xenophobic racists and white supremacists,  Christian Identity fanatics and other fundamentalists who dream of the restoration of the Patriarchy and a quasi-Confederacy under medieval Biblical law as a tyranny of the Elect, and amoral Plutocrats out to loot America for all the wealth they can send offshore while sabotaging our economy and driving our nations into collapse, thereby removing the major guarantor of freedom and human rights in the world and opening everything to exploitation.

     A full accounting of the treasons and crimes of Trump and his Republican conspirators would fill a thousand pages and more, would roll on like the endless night litany of the death of God during an Orthodox Easter service; but this is the moment of its end, wherein the chanting turns to rapture and joy at the break of dawn, for Nancy Pelosi and the power brokers of the Democratic Party have rummaged around in Pandora’s Box and found at last our hope, calling for impeachment and the restoration of the rule of law just at the point of no return, before the legitimacy of our government and the values on which it is built, freedom, equality, truth, and justice, are forever lost and America falls to fascism and tyranny, and with it the world descends into a Dark Age.

     It took a millennia to emerge from the last one; civilization may not be recoverable again, should it fall under conditions of fascism and totalitarian regimes of absolute state power and surveillance, war, ethnostates and genocides, and unbridled extractive plunder of the earth. And this we must resist.

     Therefore celebrate with me the call for impeachment, and prepare ourselves for the great struggle ahead to make it real, to reawaken America’s values and to save democracy and universal human rights throughout the world.

January 16 2020; As the Articles of Impeachment are Signed, Let Us Remember the Unfitness, Lies, and Crimes of Traitor Trump

     As the Articles of Impeachment are signed, let us remember the unfitness, lies, and crimes of Traitor Trump; his subversions of democracy, his use of gun violence and deniable forces of white supremacist terror, his concentration camps and campaign of ethnic cleansing, his crimes against children and perversions of misogyny and sexual terror, his sabotage of America’s global hegemony of power and privilege and our role as principal guarantor of freedom, his defilement of our sacred honor and betrayal of our historical legacy as a free society of equals, and his treasonous and criminal actions as a Russian agent and as chief conspirator of the Fourth Reich in the destruction of our values and institutions of freedom, equality, truth, and justice.

    Our President is the primary existential threat to the survival of the United States of America and to democracy globally. And this we must resist with our whole lives and to the last, all we who love liberty.

February 5 2020 Democracy Falls in America: the Acquittal of Traitor Trump

   Today we have witnessed the fall of democracy in America and the dawn of an age of tyranny from which western civilization born in the Forum of Athens may never recover; the last such rebirth took a millennium of darkness between the Fall of Rome and the Renaissance, and our recovery as a free society of equals under conditions of absolute surveillance and social control in a Fourth Reich of patriarchy, racism, and state terror is far less certain than it was when overrun by barbarians, for today the barbarians have seized control of our government and its vast apparatus of force.

    This we must resist, by any means necessary. At the end I am driven finally to reconsider the position of the great, flawed idol of my youth Malcolm X; by any means necessary.

     I mourn for America and for Liberty, for our loss of meaning and of value, for the desecration and annihilation of our principles and our role as a beacon of hope to the world.

     By any means necessary; this is a horrible, terrible principle of action, one fraught with endless possibilities of inhumanity and malign power, yet if we are forced to a resistance of survival as was Camus, who wrote for those who must claw their way out of the ruins of lost positions and face yet another last stand, how else may we combat our dehumanization?

     We must never surrender hope, for our resistance can triumph over anything but the loss of our faith in ourselves and one another. So long as one of us remembers the dream of freedom, we may yet redeem our humanity.

      My answer to the Republican subversion of democracy remains NO!

     Yet beyond this, we must fight not merely against fascism but also for democracy and the universal rights of man. As we resist fascism to defend equality and freedom as our common human rights, so we must use force and violence against social and institutional structures and ideologies and not persons, for we may seek truth together nonviolently with those with whom we disagree as the signal virtue of democracy and humanism, even with our enemies as brother warriors.

     Resisting evil means resisting that of others against our universal humanity, but also means resisting the seduction of evil and power and of our own use of force to compel others.

     Power is the evil impulse which births monsters.

     So often in history those who commit true atrocities are utterly convinced of the justice of their cause, Gott Mitt Uns, are informed and motivated by narratives of victimhood and have abandoned the self-questioning which is the fulcrum of a free society of equals. This, too, we must resist.

     For this is why revolutions, once power has been seized and tyranny overthrown, may become themselves tyrannies, and why I prefer to let others run amok and be ungovernable to the specter of authoritarian social control.

     Let us send no armies to enforce virtue.

     And remember always Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

January 13 2021 You Cannot Reason with a Tiger When Your Head Is In Its Mouth: the Second Impeachment of Traitor Trump

   The inspirational and sadly relevant film Darkest Hour contains a fictional quote from Winston Churchill which I’m thinking of as I watch the historic trial of the most dangerous terrorist and foreign agent to ever attack America, the Second Impeachment of Donald Trump, unfold on television with its endless litany of woes, violations of our ideals, and subversions of our democracy by Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump; “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth.”

    As the Battle of Britain was then, so the January 6 Insurrection and the existential threat of fascist tyranny is now; so also with the crisis of decision our nation faces in choosing to hold those who would destroy us accountable for their actions or to surrender that liberty which we have purchased with the blood of our sacred dead, and which is our legacy to the future of humankind.

    Will Trump’s Republican collaborators in fascism seize the moment to repudiate and disavow him and rejoin our society as loyal and honorable American patriots, or will they continue to stand with treason and terror?

    This moment of decision and the witness of history will forever reveal to us not only the character and merit, relative innocence or guilt, and goodness or evil of our representatives and standard bearers of democracy, but of ourselves as a nation and America as an ideal and guarantor of liberty and a beacon of hope to the world.

     Those who enable or refuse to denounce treason and terror will forever bear the title they merit; Enemy of the People. Dishonorable and cowardly grifters whose purpose in life is to loot the public wealth, those Republican enablers of treason and terror who are not personally white supremacist Nazi-Confederate fanatics but merely conspired with them to enrich themselves are abandoning Trumps Ship of Fools like rats fleeing a sinking ship. They would like us to forget their criminal complicity and act like this is business as usual, just helping murdering lunatics subjugate nonwhite people and overthrow the government; but it is not, and we will never forget.

     Now is the time not for moral cowardice and the corruption of greed, but for the courage to follow the better angels of our nature and to heed our devils not.

     The regime of Trump’s Fourth Reich has been America’s darkest hour. Let us now begin to reach for the light.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/house-trump-impeachment-vote-01-13-21/index.html?fbclid=IwAR1w6mQ3k17ozwj6eKbAO3xHLv8Vy9Ezb0M2h-UAyE0ov8gsZyKSoy2C5Ok

January 27 2021 Holocaust Remembrance Day, as the Senate Deliberates the Impeachment of Trump and the Repudiation of Fascist Tyranny and White Supremacist Terror

     On this Holocaust Remembrance Day, as the Senate deliberates the impeachment of Trump and the repudiation of Fascist tyranny and white supremacist terror, it is with special urgency that we reflect on the liberation of Auschwitz seventy-six years ago today; on the meaning, origins, and consequences of human evil, and a nation’s failure to resist its seduction and subjugation, and how each of us will meet its challenges both as individuals and as a nation.

     So many of the issues we face link back to racist and sectarian divisions of exclusionary otherness, hegemonies of elite wealth, power, and privilege and authorized hierarchies of belonging; the injustices of state terror and racist police violence, the disparities of healthcare access and economic insecurity which have driven the emergence of a vast precariat during the pandemic, and the existential threat of the collapse of democracy and the capture of our government by the Fourth Reich of which Trump’s January 6 Insurrection is but the tip of an iceberg.

     Our purpose in the second impeachment of Trump is the discovery and exposure of the network of conspiracy which has enabled his crimes, and a public reckoning for all of his collaborators in treason, tyranny, and terror. Under oath and on the record for all of history, let us pursue fascism to its destruction.

    Dismantling the network of treason and white supremacist terror which has seized us in its jaws and bringing its conspirators to justice will not be enough to free us from its threat, which hangs above our heads like a Sword of Damocles; we must also abolish the institutions of state terror and tyranny, of force and control, surveillance and disinformation, birthed in overwhelming and pervasive fear on 911 and given free reign by the Patriot Act. For the power and secrecy of our security service and a militarized police are not a strength but a weakness; they give authority the means to drive us into submission and transform democracy into tyranny. No state should possess such powers.

     What is to be done? Lenin’s great question resonates for us today as it did against monarchies and colonial empires, and as our civilization destroyed itself in the World Wars. The fall of democracy and of global human civilization is once again possible because many of our governments have been attacked from within by the subversion of intrusive forces, but also because of the mechanical failures of our systems and structures from their internal contradictions. These flaws in the ways we have chosen to be human together we must reimagine and transform.

     To choose one example of an area of reform among the apparatus of state terror and tyranny, a clear and present evil to represent the rest, consider the social use of force in the case of our concentration camps for nonwhite migrants at our border with Mexico, and the horrors of our racist ethnic cleansing and campaign of genocide in the example of the psychological torture of migrant children, the legacy of abandonment from our policy of orphaning and the cruel mystery of the lost children.

      We must throw open the gates of these prisons and welcome those who have come to us for safety and for freedom as our brothers and sisters in liberty and a free society of equals.

    We must disband the instruments of ethnic cleansing and tyranny including Homeland Security and its ICE and Border Patrol forces, and their deniable assets including fifth columns within our military and security services, secret armies, and organizations of terror including those which stormed our capitol, and hold accountable all those responsible for enacting and carrying out policies of racist ethnic cleansing, genocide, and crimes against humanity just as we did at Nuremberg.

     Above all we must rescue the children from abuse and crimes against humanity by our government. Each of us has the opportunity to test ourselves and the quality of our humanity in righteous action, by uniting in challenge to authority and to evil in defense of the innocent.

   For never again is no longer a historical reference to an incomprehensible evil, and has become a choice each of us must make. How we answer this test will condemn or redeem us, decide the fate of countless others and signal the fall or rebirth of our civilization.

     Our choice is simple; when they come for the children, shall we surrender them to torture and disappearance by the state and its police, or shall we defend and protect them to the last?

     How would we have met this test in that other time of darkness generations ago, whose history surfaces one particular face to represent all the unknown faces of the lost children?

     And so I ask you, I beg, I demand; abandon not the innocent, but be a refuge and sanctuary from hate.

     I ask you in the name of Anne Frank. 

 February 10 2021 Treason, Tyranny, and Terror on Trial: As the Second Impeachment of Traitor Trump Begins, I Submit Charges Before the People’s Tribunal of Crimes Against Humanity for Which Trump and His Collaborators Should Now Be On Trial

     Among the many crimes against humanity for which Traitor Trump and his collaborators should be on trial but are not yet include the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Mexican and other nonwhite migrants, the concentration camps at our border, the orphaning and torture of children, and the state tyranny and terror of fascist and racist violence as national policy perpetrated by the ICE and Border Patrol components of Homeland Security, forces of repression which are antidemocratic by their nature and which should be abolished as a top priority of the Restoration of America.

    Just as villainous and reprehensible is the parallel program of racist police violence and the carceral state to re-enslave Black American citizens and enforce systemic forms of inequality and injustice through state terror, repression of dissent, the force of a militarized police and the counterinsurgency model of policing which has transformed our security services into an army of occupation with primarily political objectives, and the control of pervasive and endemic surveillance and propaganda, lies, illusions, and subversions of the truth.

     Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, and his circus of fools, degenerates, and barbarians, his enablers and collaborators both within the government and his shadow forces rallying under the Confederate flag to bring violence and insurrection to our nations capital and to the streets of our cities throughout America, are co-conspirators and instigators in the murders of every Black American killed by police shooting or other racist violence since its authorization by Trump in the wake of Charlottesville.

      And every missing child kidnapped by the state and disappeared into what abominable slavery or human trafficking designed in the diseased imagination of Trump and his Epstein buddies we know not of, every migrant of the huddled masses yearning to be free who died in the quest to reach the safety of America because the water caches had been intentionally sabotaged by criminals in the uniform of our nation who were “just following orders” like their counterparts in the SS during the Holocaust, every prisoner who died in custody because they were denied water or medical care; the blood of these and countless other victims of Trump’s narcissistic self-aggrandizement and regime of fascist corruption, racism, and patriarchal sexual terror is on the hands of every  Republican who voted for him and fails now in this trial to repudiate him publicly and renounce his works as among those of the devils which he serves. 

     For in his actions Trump has been not only a foreign agent and Putin’s puppet whose mission is the subversion of democracy and the Fall of America, but also a slave of Moloch the Seducer, Demon of Lies, in that he is not merely a pathological liar but also an idiot madman who cannot distinguish truth from lies, and who has weaponized his delusions and psychopathy as instruments of our falsification and subjugation in his quest for tyrannical power.

     The bizarre and lurid dark fairytales of the QAnon conspiracy theory movement, like the charges of the Inquisition and the Nazis which othered witches and Jews on which QAnon is constructed, serves as deflection from Trump’s loathsome perversions and sexual terrorism.

     His Stop the Steal campaign is a similar deflection which shields him from inquiry into the Stolen Election of 2016 and the fact that his Presidency was entirely illegitimate and due to Russian interference; it was also the rhetorical and organizational basis of his final attempted coup on January 6, for which he is now being impeached for the second time.

     We must cast out the monsters from among us, the racists and white supremacist terrorists, the Gideonite fundamentalists and patriarchs of Christian Identity fascism and sexual terror, and the amoral forces of repression of those who would enslave us and who enforce hegemonies of elite power and privilege and hierarchies of exclusionary otherness armed with guns and badges and the authority of a government which has been infiltrated by the Fourth Reich, an implacable and relentless enemy which has come just short of seizing us in its jaws.

     We must give fascism no second chances.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-impeachment-incitement-insurrection-senate_n_60228f2dc5b689330e32b4b8

February 13 2021 A Curtain Falls: End of the Second Impeachment

     Today the Republican Party has passed on a crucial opportunity to distance itself from the regime and legacy of Trump, one which may have preserved it as a voice of true conservatism safeguarding the anchorages of our traditions, values, and institutions of democracy to buffer the shock of change in a world of increasing contingency and ephemeral mutability, in which adaptation to new threats and conditions is a requirement of survival, and instead chosen to surrender their legitimacy.

     This I mourn, for the future of America and humankind will require both a conserving force and a revolutionary force able to cooperate as partners in a game such as chess; each struggling against the other to shape the patterns of meaning and value which emerge like the shell of a fantastic sea creature as a history expressed in our form, but playing by the same rules.

     Our representatives have passed their judgement; but we must now pass ours.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started