August 4 2024 Madness Death Illumination Transcendence: A Song of Beirut

     O my brothers and sisters, our universe is not always rational or meaningful from our perspective; it is chaotic, absurd, and often hostile. We need meaning and value, but all we have is the meaning and value which we create and impose on our nothingness. The Infinite mocks us, but also beckons and challenges us to become better.

     As I wrote on this day four years ago in my post of August 4 2020; A horror beyond imagining has transpired in Beirut, which lies in ruins. Civilization dispersed throughout the Mediterranean from here thousands of years ago, uniting Europe, Asia, and Africa in a community of humankind which resonates through our consciousness today.

    We seek meaning in the catastrophes and life disruptive events which flesh is heir to, yet as in the disaster in Beirut such causes are often beyond our understanding.

     Herein I refer now to Sura 18 of the Holy Quran, called The Cave, verses 60-82, an allegory wherein Khidr, the Islamic Trickster figure who is an immortal and is symbolized as green as an embodiment of the Garden of Paradise, who acts as a guide of the soul through the puzzles of the labyrinth of life which leads toward it, and who speaks to us through dreams, visions, and signs.

     I consider it a narrative form of Godel’s Theorem; a proof of the necessity of faith and of the existence of the Infinite, of the limits of human knowledge and the Absurdity of the human condition. Such an interpretation aligns with that of   the great scholar and translator Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

     As with the foundational thought experiment of one of Plato’s contemporaries, the Spear of Archytas, which defines the horizon of the known as it is thrown and marks a boundary in landing, which we repeat endlessly in scientific revolutions, the unknown remains as vast as before, conserving ignorance. This is the first principle of epistemology; the Conservation of Ignorance.

     The canonical story recapitulates themes of the Sacrifice of Ibrahim which I would say forms the basis of Islamic faith, and in the streets of Beirut long ago I saw it unfold once again.

    In this story the Green Man instructs Moses by doing three things which are criminal and nonsensical, things which can be understood only through the foreknowledge of prophecy which is not ours. As with justice, foresight does not belong to man, for the universe is nondeterministic, limitless, and our possible futures are always in play.

    The relevant passage is this;  فَأَرَدْنَا أَن يُبْدِلَهُمَا رَبُّهُمَا خَيْرًا مِّنْهُ زَكَاةً وَأَقْرَبَ رُحْمًا, or “So we intended that their Lord should substitute for them a better son than him in purity and nearer to mercy,” a classic changeling substitution. It also represents a point of bifurcation on which possible futures turn.

     I have hope for the future of humankind because of what I witnessed when this primary story was played out before me forty years ago, and because of it I have never despaired.

     Such a gate stands or once stood in Beirut, like Rashomon Gate or a gate to the Infinite and to limitless possibilities of human becoming. It may now be dust and memories, or like Schrodinger’s Cat both exist and not exist at once; this I cannot answer for you.

      But I can speak as the witness of history that something remarkable happened there in its shadow, which like Khidr exchanging the young man for another to prevent a greater evil from occurring in the future, a time travel paradox if ever there was one, struck me with the force of revelation.

     It was an insignificant thing in the scope of the Siege of Beirut, one atrocity among many which was averted by the innate goodness of a single man whose name remains unknown, a tragic hero whom I will never forget, an unwilling conscript in the service of his government like so many others, who said no to authority and to the seduction of evil. The existence of humankind pivots on the balance of such individuals, and they are very few.

    This Israeli soldier refused to commit violations and depravities upon the person of a Palestinian girl, about twelve years old, who had been captured for this purpose by the lieutenant of his platoon, a common loyalty test and initiation. He blushed at the first demand of his officer to the tauntings of his fellows, there in the street before the Gate of Decision we must all face, then became angry in refusal when he realized it was not a joke, that the Occupation was about terror and plunder and not as he had been told. His commanding officer murdered him where he stood with a single shot to the head as the girl escaped.

     I have returned to this spot throughout my life to touch the stones stained with his blood, for I am reminded that we are not beyond redemption, and that so long as we resist unjust authority we are free, and there is hope.

     As written by Bassem Mroue and Lujain Jo in ABC, in an article entitled 3 years after Beirut port blast, intrigue foils an investigation and even the death toll is disputed: attempts to prosecute those responsible are mired in political intrigue, the final death toll remains disputed and many Lebanese have less faith than ever in their disintegrating state institutions; As the country marks the anniversary Friday, relatives of some of those killed are still struggling to get their loved ones recognized as blast victims, reflecting the ongoing chaos since the Aug. 4, 2020 explosion. The blast killed at least 218 people, according to an Associated Press count, wounded more than 6,000, devastated large swaths of Beirut and caused billions of dollars in damages.

     Among those not recognized as a blast victim is a five-month-old boy, Qusai Ramadan, a child of Syrian refugees. His parents say he was killed when the explosion toppled the ceiling and a cupboard in his hospital room, crushing him. They have been unable to get the infant added to the official death list, a move that could have made them eligible for future compensation.

     They accuse the authorities of discriminating against victims who are not Lebanese.

     Meanwhile, the blast anniversary brought renewed calls for an international investigation of those responsible, including top officials who allowed hundreds of tons of highly flammable ammonium nitrate, a material used in fertilizers, to be improperly stored for years at a warehouse in the port.

     Lebanese and international organizations, survivors and families of victims sent an appeal to the U.N. Rights Council, saying that on the third anniversary of the explosion, “we are no closer to justice and accountability for the catastrophe.”

     Hundreds of people marched in the Lebanese capital on Friday to mark the anniversary, with some family members of the victims calling on the international community to help in the investigation.

     Carrying roses and photos of their loved ones, the families led the march and gathered outside Beirut’s port. Victims’ names were read and a moment of silence was held at 6:07 p.m. — the time when the blast occurred.

     The mother of one of the victims called for an international and impartial investigation “within the U.N. framework.”

     “Three years have passed and you have been turning a deaf ear to this request and this hurts a lot,” said Mireille Bazergy Khoury, the mother of Elias Khoury who was killed by the blast. “This crime is not a Lebanese issue. Victims are all of all nationalities. Please taken action.”

     Maan, a Lebanese group advocating for victims and survivors, put the death toll at 236, significantly higher than the government’s count of 191. The authorities stopped counting the dead a month after the blast, even as some of the severely wounded later died.

     Among those listed by the Maan initiative is Qusai, the Syrian infant. He had been undergoing treatment for a severe liver condition and was transferred to a government hospital near the port about a week before the explosion. Hospital staff said the infant needed a liver transplant and was in critical condition.

     On the day of the blast, Qusai’s aunt, Noura Mohammed, was sitting at his bedside while his mother rested at home. The aunt said the staff ordered everyone to evacuate immediately after the explosion, and that she found the infant dead, crushed by fallen debris, when she returned.

     Hospital officials said Qusai died an hour after the explosion, with the death certificate listing cardio respiratory arrest as the cause. The family buried him a day later.

     “We asked them (the authorities) to register my son among the victims of the blast,” his mother, Sarah Jassem Mohammed, said in a recent interview in a small tent in an orchard in the northern Lebanese village of Markabta, where she lives with her husband, two sons and one daughter. “They refused.”

     Lebanon is home to more than 1 million Syrian refugees, who make about 20% of the country’s population. A Lebanese group, the Anti-Racism Movement, said that among those killed in the blast were at least 76 non-Lebanese citizens, including 52 Syrians.

     Meanwhile, many in Lebanon have been losing faith in the domestic investigation and some have started filing cases abroad against companies suspected of bringing in the ammonium nitrate.

     The chemicals had been shipped to Lebanon in 2013. Senior political and security officials knew of their presence and potential danger but did nothing.

     Lebanese and non-Lebanese victims alike have seen justice delayed, with the investigation stalled since December 2021. Lebanon’s powerful and corrupt political class has repeatedly intervened in the work of the judiciary.

     In January, Lebanon’s top prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat ordered the release of all suspects detained in the investigation.

    “The political class have used every tool at their disposal — both legal and extra legal — to undermine, obstruct, and block the domestic investigation into the blast,” said Aya Majzoub, deputy chief for the Mideast and North Africa at the rights group Amnesty International.

     Makhoul Mohammed, 40, a Syrian citizen, was lightly injured in the blast in his Beirut apartment while his daughter Sama, who was 6 at the time, lost her left eye.

     Mohammed, who settled in Canada last year, said he plans to sue those responsible for the explosion in a Canadian court.

     “The (domestic) investigation will not lead to results as long as this political class is running the country,” he said.”

     As written in Al Jazeera, in an article entitled Photos: Hundreds protest as Lebanon marks third anniversary of Beirut blast: Three years on, investigation is virtually at a standstill, leaving survivors still yearning for answers; “Lebanon marked three years since one of history’s biggest non-nuclear explosions rocked Beirut with hundreds of protesters marching alongside victims’ families to demand long-awaited justice.

     Nobody has been held to account for the tragedy as political and legal pressures impede the investigation.

     On August 4, 2020, the massive blast at Beirut’s port destroyed swathes of the Lebanese capital, killing more than 220 people and injuring at least 6,500.

     Authorities said the disaster was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where a vast stockpile of ammonium nitrate fertiliser had been haphazardly stored for years.

     Three years on, the probe is virtually at a standstill, leaving survivors still yearning for answers.

     Protesters, many wearing black and carrying photographs of the victims, marched towards the port shouting slogans including: “We will not forget.”

     “Our pain inspires our persistence to search for the truth,” said protester Tania Daou-Alam, 54, who lost her husband in the explosion.

     Lack of justice “is the biggest example of rampant corruption in Lebanon, and we can no longer bear it”, she said.

     The blast struck during an economic collapse, which the World Bank has called one of the worst in recent history and is widely blamed on a governing elite accused of corruption and mismanagement.

     Some protesters waved a Lebanese flag covered in blood-like red paint while others carried an enormous flag covered in a written pledge to keep fighting for justice.

     “I have the right to know why my fellow Lebanese were killed,” said protester Jad Mattar, 42.

     Since its early days, the investigation into the explosion has faced a slew of political and legal challenges.

     In December 2020, lead investigator Fadi Sawan charged former Prime Minister Hassan Diab and three ex-ministers with negligence.

     But as political pressure mounted, Sawan was removed from the case.

     His successor, Tarek Bitar, unsuccessfully asked lawmakers to lift parliamentary immunity for MPs who were formerly cabinet ministers.

     The interior ministry has refused to execute arrest warrants that the lead investigator has issued.

    In December 2021, Bitar suspended his probe after a barrage of lawsuits, mainly from politicians he summoned on charges of negligence.

     Bitar has refused to step aside but has not set foot inside Beirut’s Justice Palace for months.

     “Work [on the investigation] is ongoing,” a legal expert with knowledge of the case said, requesting anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

     Bitar is determined to keep his promise to deliver justice for victims’ families, the expert added.

     On Thursday, 300 individuals and organisations, including Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International, renewed a call for the United Nations to establish a fact-finding mission – a demand Lebanese officials have repeatedly rejected.

       “If those responsible are not held accountable, it will put the country on a trajectory that allows this kind of crime to be repeated,” HRW’s Lama Fakih told the Agence France-Presse news agency at the protest.

     As written by Tamara Qiblawi in CNN, in an article entitled Beirut’s port blast two years on: An open wound festers as authorities try to close the case; “Clocks stopped when one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history ripped through Beirut. Inside wrecked homes and shops, the force of the shockwaves froze the dials of timepieces, some vintage, others sleek and modern.

     It was 6:07 pm. Thousands of lives were upended and the Lebanese capital — no stranger to disaster — was transformed into a hellscape.

     Much like the broken clocks, the catastrophe appears to have been suspended in time. Thursday marks two years since the port explosion. Yet the city’s hardest hit, eastern neighborhoods still bear the scars of the blast. The relatives of at least 215 people who perished still rally for justice. The judicial investigation into the explosion is moribund. And the port’s hulking wheat silos — which withstood the effects of the blast despite their proximity — have been burning for weeks.

     In the two years since the explosion, Lebanon’s political elite — known colloquially by the pejorative term al-sulta, or “the power” — has evaded justice and tried to sweep the memory under the proverbial rug. For activists, especially relatives of the deceased, it was painfully reminiscent of the way in which the country’s civil war ended in 1990.

     Then, an amnesty law absolved Lebanon’s warring parties of apparent crimes against humanity and war crimes, including massacres, rapes, extrajudicial executions and mass displacement. Accounts of the 15-year conflict are nowhere to be found in the country’s official history books. An entire population was instructed to move on.

     The authorities’ playbook has been similar in its response to the 2020 port blast, which remains the single most deadly explosion in Lebanon’s modern history, causing material and physical casualties as far as 12 kilometers (7.5 miles) away.

     In the intervening years, the government has repeatedly blocked a judicial probe that charged several officials with criminal neglect over the improper storage of up to 2,700 tons of explosive ammonium nitrate, the ignition of which led to the devastating blast. Some of those who were charged were re-elected to parliament this year.

     Earlier this year, the government also rolled out plans to demolish the damaged silos, drawing the ire of the victims’ families, who regard them as a memorial to the disaster. The government bowed to popular pressure and the plan was dropped.

     But weeks later, the structure began to burn, arousing the suspicion of activists and relatives of the deceased. They accused the government of making half-hearted attempts to put out the fires — a charge it denies. When two of the silos finally collapsed over the weekend, activists seethed.

     “For weeks you let the silos slowly burn and took no serious action to stop the fire,” activist Lucien Bourjeily tweeted, apparently addressing the political establishment. “The collapse (of the silos) today resembles the collapse of the state which is slowly falling apart, with no serious action to stop this nor hold those responsible accountable.”

     Beirut’s wheat silos are many things at once. They stand as a towering tombstone to a bygone era. The smoldering structure also seems to fester like the open wound of the city’s collective memory. And importantly to relatives of the victims, it marks the scene of a crime, a looming mass that serves as a reminder of the quest for accountability.

     Since the explosion, Lebanon’s financial tailspin, which began in October 2019, has continued. The country is in the throes of a bread crisis, in part because of the fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but also due to Lebanon’s infrastructural and financial decay. Its economic woes — inflation, ballooning unemployment, mass poverty — continue unabated.

     But for many, the successive crises have not overshadowed the memories of the Beirut port blast: the shattered glass that crunched underfoot for weeks afterward; the scenes of overflowing hospital wards; those who perished and those who barely survived. For those seeking justice, the events of 6:07 pm on August 4, 2020 must continue to reverberate until the people responsible are held to account.”

     As written by Jamie Prentis in The National, in an article entitled Lebanon marks second anniversary of deadly Beirut port blast; ”Lebanon on Thursday marks two years since the explosion at Beirut’s port that killed more than 215 people, injured thousands and destroyed large parts of the capital.

     Families of the victims plan to hold marches in Beirut on Thursday afternoon, as they continue their search for justice, with protests also expected in cities in the US, Europe and elsewhere.

     The August 4 explosion occurred after a huge stock of ammonium nitrate, inexplicably left in storage at the port for years, caught fire.

     So far, no senior officials have been held accountable over the blast and a judicial investigation has been stalled for eight months. There has been widespread political interference in the probe and two sitting MPs charged in connection with the investigation have refused to attend hearings.

      Speaking on the morning of the anniversary, Lebanon’s top Christian cleric Bechara Boutros Al Rai hit out at the government’s handling of the probes. He said it had “no right” to impede the investigations and that “God condemns those officials” who did so.

     UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said there had been “two years without justice”.

     “In the name of the dead, among them the son of a UN staff member, I reiterate my call for an impartial, thorough and transparent investigation into the explosion,” he said.

     Two-year-old Isaac, the son of UN staffer Sarah Copland, was the youngest person to die in the explosion.

     Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Legal Action Worldwide and other NGOs on Wednesday called on the UN to send a fact-finding mission.

     “It is now, more than ever, clear that the domestic investigation cannot deliver justice,” they said.

    On the eve of the second anniversary of the deadly blast, Pope Francis said the truth over what happened “can never be hidden”.

     The 2020 explosion has been blamed on mismanagement and corruption, and is viewed as a symptom of the country’s many systemic problems.

Compounding the trauma for survivors and relatives of victims is a fire which has blazed for weeks at the port’s grain silos, which were heavily damaged in the blast.

     A section of the silos collapsed on Sunday, and there have been warnings that another will fall soon — possibly on Thursday.

     The fate of the silos, which shielded parts of Beirut from the blast, remains a deeply sensitive topic. In April, Lebanon’s Cabinet approved their demolition after a survey found they could collapse in the coming months.

     But many Lebanese, including families of some of the blast victims, want the silos to remain as a memorial. Some believe the government is using the fire as a pretext to allow the demolition of the silos.

     Meanwhile, Lebanon is in the grip of a devastating economic crisis which first became apparent in 2019 and has been described by the World Bank as one of the worst in modern history.”

     And in another article in The Nation, Jamie Prentis and Nada Homsi write; ” At least two more silos damaged in the Beirut port blast collapsed on Thursday, as Lebanon marked two years since the massive explosion that killed more than 200 people, injured thousands and destroyed large parts of the capital.

     The collapse happened as people were gathering at the site to mark the blast anniversary. Families of the victims held marches in Beirut on Thursday afternoon as they continue their search for justice, with protests also planned in the US, Europe and elsewhere.

     A few hundred people began their march at the Qasr El Adel in Adlieh, holding photos of the victims as well as placards with slogans such as, “You will not kill us twice” and “Lebanon is hostage to a criminal regime”. The number of marchers had grown to about 2,000 by the time they reached the port.”

     As written by Clement Gibon in Time, in an article entitled The Grieving Families Fighting to Preserve a Crumbling Symbol of the Beirut Blast; “ At Gate 9 of Beirut’s port in mid July, all eyes were on the mammoth, concrete grain silos. There was a blazing fire and plumes of smoke were billowing out of the northern block of silos. Rima Zahed was here at a protest holding a portrait of her brother, Amin, one of the 218 people who were killed in the catastrophic Aug. 4, 2020 explosion at the port, which left the silos a disemboweled shell of their former selves. Zahed feared the additional damage would cause them to collapse—and denounced the Lebanese authorities for not stamping out the blaze.

    “The authorities told us that the fire was extinguished despite the fact that it was growing. They could have stopped it,” Zahed said. Her fears were borne out on July 31, when part of the silos collapsed, kicking up thick dust around the port and, for many Lebanese, reigniting trauma from the 2020 blast just days ahead of the two-year anniversary.

     Beirut’s port silos were first completed in 1970, and before the explosion they stored some 85% of Lebanon’s grain. Jean Touma, a former director of the silos from 1976-2006, says they had long ensured the country’s food security.

    But in April, Lebanon’s cabinet approved the demolition of all of Beirut’s port silos—both the northern and southern ones—located at the site of the 2020 blast. Ever since, the families of the victims of the blast have mobilized to preserve them, and are outraged about Sunday’s partial collapse. Judicial investigations into the explosion, one of the largest non-nuclear ones in history, have been obstructed and stalled by Lebanese authorities for over a year. (An independent report by Human Rights Watch last August found that “multiple Lebanese authorities were, at a minimum, criminally negligent under Lebanese law” over the handling of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate stored at the port since 2014, which caused the blast after the warehouse where the fertilizers were deposited in caught on fire.)

     On July 4, the same day the fire erupted, civil society groups alongside families of the victims launched a solidarity campaign called “The Silent Witness.” The goal still remains to protect the silos—at least now what’s left of them—that are located less than 300 feet from the epicenter of the 2020 explosion, and which absorbed much of the blast’s force thanks to the dense grain that had been stored within them. For Mariana Fodoulian, who lost her 29-year-old sister in the blast, both the collapse and the government’s drive to demolish all of the silos is part of the country’s endemic culture of impunity. 

    “How could they let the [northern block of silos] collapse just before Aug. 4?” Fodoulian says. If no silos are left standing in the end, “when future generations grow up, no one can tell them what happened.”

      A history of amnesia

     A culture of impunity has plagued Lebanon since the 1975-1990 civil war—which left at least 120,000 people dead and pushed some 1 million people, more than one-third of the population at the time, to leave the country. The adoption of an amnesty law in 1991 protected those accused of war crimes and allowed them to remain key players in Lebanon’s fractured political scene. No less than 17,000 people are still missing from the war, affecting thousands of families who are still waiting for answers about their fate.

     At the same time, key visual reminders of the war have been erased through the demolition of historic downtown areas that saw some of the conflict’s fiercest fighting. Experts say that firms involved in post-war reconstruction—chiefly Solidere, which was overseen by former Prime Minister Rafic Hariri—contributed to that amnesia. Critics say that Solidere further erased memories of the war by tearing down iconic and historical buildings such as the Rivoli cinema and destroying more homes than even the fighting had.

     Lebanese authorities have been “trying to repeat the same policies of amnesia that followed the civil war with the silos. They do not want people to remember anything related to the crimes they committed,” says Soha Mneimeh, an urban planning researcher at the Beirut Urban Lab and member of the Order of Engineers and Architects of Beirut.

     Families of the victims and activists who have been trying to protect the silos are troubled by the lack of consideration by the government, Mneimeh says. (The government has not launched any public consultations, nor input from the families of the deceased.) The blaze and subsequent collapse has only fueled that anger.

     Following the 2020 blast, the government commissioned several studies to assess the damage to the silos. One of the latest, conducted in March by the Swiss firm Ammann Engineering, noted that the northern block would not stand for more than a decade and could collapse within months. The assessment concluded that the southern block, however, was stable and “demolition is not a priority compared to other challenges in Beirut port.”

     Mneimeh says the northern block of silos could have been safely reinforced and preserved—a view that was supported by some of the studies. For her, these studies make clear that the decision in April to demolish all of the silos, including the stable southern ones, was ultimately a political one.

     Indeed, the government’s plan to rebuild the silos at a new location is an apparent recognition that the blast site could not be easily repurposed for other uses. These 48-meter (157-foot) concrete structures were built on land that was reclaimed from the sea and reinforced with piles. The foundations sitting below can no longer withstand large structures, engineers and architects have said.

     A push for remembrance

     In June, the families of the victims filed three lawsuits at Lebanon’s Shura council to overturn the government’s decision to demolish all of the silos. They have also requested a stay of execution until the council considers the suits. For Ghida Frangieh, a lawyer who helped draft one of the lawsuits and is a researcher at the NGO Legal Agenda, continuing ahead with such plans would deny victims their rights.

     “International standards consider preservation of the crime site to be part of compensation for victims, which includes recognition of the victims’ pain and satisfaction,” Frangieh says. Failure to preserve them “would not only affect their mental health, but also their right to be treated with dignity.”

     In addition to legal recourse, the families of the victims have for months tried to register the silos on the UNESCO World Heritage List. These efforts build off Minister of Culture Mohammad Wissam El-Mortada’s decision in March to designate them as heritage buildings.

     “The silos are part of the city,” says Mortada. “They also represent a common memory for all the people who were victims of the explosion.”

     Mortada soon after withdrew his decision to list the silos as a heritage site, citing a lack of resources to secure their protection. But he says he has been working since then to create a public park with an open museum and a memorial site in collaboration with artist Rudy Rahme on the east side of Beirut’s port.

     That there are government plans to rebuild the silos—at a time of soaring wheat prices and global food disruption brought on by the war in Ukraine, not to mention Lebanon’s ongoing economic crisis—at a separate location bolsters the case for preserving what’s left of them, the families say.

      Back at the launch of the “Silent Witness” campaign in early July, by the Emigrant statue opposite the port that acknowledges the millions of Lebanese in the diaspora, Elie Hasrouty, who lost his 59-year-old father who was working at the silos at the time of the explosion, is exasperated by the uphill battle to preserve the silos.

     “Every day that passes, with the stalling of the investigation and the government’s willingness to demolish the silos, is a continuation of the Aug. 4 crime,” Hasrouty says. He says that he is at a “great loss” when TIME checks in with him after the partial collapse. “It is a place that represented our wounds, and our pain. I am very angry with the behavior of the authorities. It has been two years and nothing has been done to preserve the silos, and make it a place of memory.”

Arabic      

4 أغسطس 2021 جنون الموت تجاوز الإضاءة: أنشودة بيروت

     يا إخوتي وأخواتي ، إن كوننا ليس دائمًا عقلانيًا أو ذا مغزى من منظورنا ؛ إنها فوضوية وسخيفة وعدائية في كثير من الأحيان. نحن بحاجة إلى المعنى والقيمة ، ولكن كل ما لدينا هو المعنى والقيمة التي نخلقها ونفرضها على العدم. اللانهائي يسخر منا ، ولكنه أيضًا يلهمنا ويتحدىنا لنصبح أفضل.

     حل رعب يفوق التصوير في بيروت التي أصبحت مهدمة. انتشرت الحضارة في جميع أنحاء البحر الأبيض المتوسط من هنا منذ آلاف السنين ، ووحدت أوروبا وآسيا وأفريقيا في مجتمع البشرية الذي يتردد صداه من خلال وعينا اليوم.

    نحن نبحث عن معنى في الكوارث والأحداث المربكة للحياة التي يرثها الجسد ، ولكن كما في كارثة بيروت ، غالبًا ما تكون هذه الأسباب خارجة عن فهمنا.

     أشير هنا الآن إلى سورة 18 من القرآن الكريم ، تسمى الكهف ، الآيات 60-82 ، وهي قصة رمزية فيها الخضر ، الشخصية الإسلامية المخادعة التي هي خالدة وترمز إلى اللون الأخضر لتجسيد جنة الجنة ، التي تعمل كدليل للنفس عبر ألغاز متاهة الحياة التي تقود إليها ، والتي تخاطبنا من خلال الأحلام والرؤى والعلامات.

     أنا أعتبره شكل سردي لنظرية وديل. دليل على ضرورة الإيمان ووجود اللانهائي لحدود المعرفة الإنسانية وعبثية الحالة الإنسانية. يتوافق هذا التفسير مع تفسير العالم والمترجم العظيم عبد الله يوسف علي.

     كما هو الحال مع تجربة الفكر التأسيسي لأحد معاصري أفلاطون ، الرمح للأرخيتا ، الذي يحدد أفق المعرف باسمه ويلقي بحدود في الهبوط ، والتي نكررها بلا نهاية في الثورات العلمية ، يبقى المجهول واسعًا كما كان من قبل والمحافظة على الجهل. هذا هو المبدأ الأول لنظرية المعرفة. حفظ الجهل.

     تلخص القصة القانونية مواضيع ذبيحة إبراهيم التي أود أن أقول أنها تشكل أساس العقيدة الإسلامية ، وفي شوارع بيروت منذ فترة طويلة رأيتها تتكشف مرة أخرى.

    في هذه القصة ، يرشد الرجل الأخضر موسى من خلال القيام بثلاثة أشياء إجرامية وغير منطقية ، أشياء لا يمكن فهمها إلا من خلال المعرفة المسبقة للنبوة التي ليست لنا. كما هو الحال مع العدالة ، البصيرة لا تخص الإنسان.

    المقطع ذات الصلة هذا ؛ فَأَرَدْنَا أَن يُبْدِلَهُمَا رَبُّهُمَا خَيْرًا مِّنْهُ زَكَاةً وَأَقْرَبَ رُحْمًا ، أو “لذا قصدنا أن يحل ربهم محلهم ابنًا أفضل منه في الطهارة وأقرب إلى الرحمة”. كما أنه يمثل نقطة تشعب تتحول عليها العقود الآجلة المحتملة.

     لدي أمل لمستقبل البشرية بسبب ما شاهدته عندما تم عرض هذه القصة الأولية أمامي قبل ثمانية وثلاثين سنة مضت ، وبسببها لم يأس أبداً.

     مثل هذه البوابة تقف أو كانت في يوم من الأيام في بيروت ، مثل بوابة راشومون أو بوابة اللانهائي والإمكانيات غير المحدودة للإنسان. قد يكون الآن غبارًا وذكريات ، أو مثل قطة شرودنجر ، كلاهما موجود وغير موجود في وقت واحد ؛ هذا لا يمكنني الإجابة عليه.

      لكن يمكنني أن أتكلم كشاهد على التاريخ بأن شيئًا رائعًا حدث هناك في ظلها ، مثل تبادل خضر الشاب بآخر لمنع حدوث شر أكبر في المستقبل ، مفارقة السفر عبر الزمن إذا كان هناك أي شيء ، أدهشني بقوة الوحي.

     لقد كان شيئًا غير ذي أهمية في نطاق حصار بيروت ، وحشية واحدة من بين العديد من الفظائع التي تم تجنبها من خلال الخير الفطري لرجل واحد لا يزال اسمه غير معروف ، بطل مأساوي لن أنساه أبدًا ، مجند غير راغب في خدمة حكومته مثل كثيرين آخرين ، الذين قالوا لا للسلطة ولإغواء الشر. إن وجود البشرية محوري في توازن هؤلاء الأفراد ، وهم قليلون جدًا.

    رفض هذا الجندي الإسرائيلي ارتكاب انتهاكات وحروق على فتاة فلسطينية تبلغ من العمر اثني عشر عامًا ، تم أسرها لهذا الغرض من قبل ملازم فصيلته ، وهو اختبار ولاء مشترك. خجل عند أول طلب من ضابطه لسخرية زملائه ، هناك في الشارع قبل بوابة القرار الذي يجب أن نواجهه جميعًا ، ثم غضب في الرفض عندما أدرك أنه ليس مزحة ، أن الاحتلال كان عن الإرهاب ونهب وليس كما قيل له. قتله ضابط قيادته حيث وقف برصاصة واحدة في الرأس أثناء هروب الفتاة.

     لقد عدت إلى هذا المكان طوال حياتي لألمس الأحجار الملطخة بدمه ، لأنني أتذكر أننا لسنا خارج حدود الخلاص ، وطالما أننا نقاوم السلطة الظالمة فنحن أحرار ، وهناك أمل.

A Map of My Beirut, what remains of it and the ghosts of what it was

Here a great nothingness has swallowed the voices of the past

Yet they live within us, songs of ourselves and the limitless possibilities of becoming human

 How can we answer the terror of our nothingness

The flaws of our humanity

And the brokenness of the world?

Here among the ruins of a lost grandeur

Fallen empires and the ghosts and legacies of

Beautiful and terrible histories

I wail in grief, I roar defiance, I demand justice

But my words are devoured by silences

I swear vengeance for a lost history and a ruined city

Without an enemy to bring a reckoning to

For this hammer blow of fate was the act of no saboteur

But only a consequence of our common greed and responsibility shifting

And the labyrinthine bureaucracy that misfiled records

Of a derelict ship full of fertilizer quietly degrading in harbor for years

How many such forgotten existential threats

Now lie waiting to seize and shake us?

Here was once a gate to the Infinite and a shrine of the Impossible

In bloodstains which offered hope and redemption

Where now not a stone stands upon a stone

And the light of Beirut become

Vast and fathomless chasms of darkness

Arabic

خارطة بيروت بلدي وما تبقى منها وأشباح ما كانت عليه

هنا ابتلع العدم العظيم أصوات الماضي

ومع ذلك ، فهم يعيشون في داخلنا ، أغاني من أنفسنا وإمكانيات لا حدود لها في أن نصبح بشرًا

  كيف يمكننا الرد على رعب العدم لدينا

عيوب إنسانيتنا

وانكسار الدنيا؟

هنا بين أنقاض العظمة المفقودة الإمبراطوريات الساقطة وأشباح وموروثات

تواريخ جميلة ورهيبة

أبوح حزنًا ، وأصرخ متحديًا ، وأطالب بالعدالة

لكن الصمت يلتهم كلامي

أقسم بالانتقام لتاريخ ضائع ومدينة مدمرة

بدون عدو لجلب الحساب إليه

لأن ضربة القدر هذه كانت فعلاً غير مخرب

ولكن فقط نتيجة لتغير جشعنا المشترك ومسؤوليتنا

والبيروقراطية المتاهة التي أخطأت في ضبط السجلات

من سفينة مهجورة مليئة بالأسمدة تتحلل بهدوء في الميناء لسنوات

كم عدد هذه التهديدات الوجودية المنسية

الآن تكمن في انتظار الاستيلاء علينا وهزنا؟

هنا كانت ذات مرة بوابة إلى اللانهائي وضريح المستحيل

في بقع الدماء التي أعطت الأمل والفداء

حيث لا يوجد الآن حجر يقف على حجر

ويصبح نور بيروت

منوعات الظلام الشاسعة التي لا يسبر غورها

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8829821,35.4963575,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m3!11m2!2sbRiRoVhVlnnOfGcTK7nCKErQ2ojuwQ!3e3

3 years after Beirut port blast, intrigue foils an investigation and even the death toll is disputed

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/3rd-anniversary-beirut-port-blast-probe-blocked-intrigue-102008454

Photos: Hundreds protest as Lebanon marks third anniversary of Beirut blast

https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/8/4/photos-hundreds-protest-as-lebanon-marks-third-anniversary-of-beirut-blast

Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite, by Rudy Rucker

Rashomon Effects: Kurosawa, Rashomon and Their Legacies

by Blair Davis (Editor), Robert Anderson (Editor), Jan Walls (Editor)

In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality, by John Gribbin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/513367.In_Search_of_Schr_dinger_s_Cat

Khidr in Sufi Poetry: A Selection, by Paul Smith

Where the Two Seas Meet: Al-Khidr and Moses—The Qur’anic Story of al-Khidr and Moses in Sufi Commentaries as a Model for Spiritual Guidance, by Hugh Talat Halman

          Lebanon, a reading list

Beirut, Samir Kassir

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7966167-beirut?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_12

Lebanon: A History, 600 – 2011, William W. Harris

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13687123-lebanon?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_50

Memory for Forgetfulness: August Beirut 1982, Mahmoud Darwish

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/142583.Memory_for_Forgetfulness?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_62

 Concerto al-Quds, Adonis, Khaled Mattawa (Translation)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34746502-concerto-al-quds?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_21

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/03/middleeast/lebanon-silos-beirut-blast-anniversary-mime-intl/index.html

https://www.msn.com/en-ae/news/middleeast/lebanon-marks-second-anniversary-of-deadly-beirut-port-blast/ar-AA10ifDi

https://www.thenationalnews.com/mena/lebanon/2022/08/04/lebanon-marks-second-anniversary-of-deadly-beirut-port-blast/

https://time.com/6202125/beirut-explosion-anniversary/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/04/a-year-on-from-beruit-explosion-scars-and-questions-remain

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/03/opinions/beirut-explosion-one-year-anniversary-bazzi/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/03/middleeast/beirut-blast-anniversary-grief-anger-wedeman-intl-cmd/index.html

August 3 2024 Say Their Names: Anniversary of the El Paso Massacre

On this day five years ago, the sixth deadliest incident in our documented history of racist violence was perpetrated against the people of America; the El Paso Massacre. I use the qualifier “documented” because most racial violence in America has gone unrecorded and forgotten, save for the obscene post cards of lynchings widely traded in times past among Confederate sympathizers. The pervasive and ongoing ethnic cleansing and indirect enslavement of Latino persons as migrant labor has in the main gone unheralded and unlamented.

     It is difficult and uncomfortable to awaken to the fact that we white Americans are the beneficiaries of slave labor, yet this is precisely true. Our economy runs on the relative wealth disparity of invisible and exploitable persons; how else may one characterize such relationships other than as slavery? 

     The mass murders of Latinos by white supremacist terrorists are a consequence and side effect of a massive and endemic relationship of unequal power; whole sectors of our economy, agriculture, hospitality, child and elder care, food service, and more rely on cheap and unregulated labor. For true parallels to America’s economic system one must look to the migrant African labor in Italy’s agricultural camps; people with no legal existence who may be buried where they die in secret graves, worked without benefits, social security, medical insurance, nothing but their wages which are below the legal minimum. There are no OSHA or other laws which pertain to them, for Latino migrant laborers have no existence on paper.

     Migrant labor is slave labor.

      Our hegemonic elites, a phrase I gladly appropriate from Antonio Gramsci and Marx, do not actually want to enact genocide, sacrifice a vast pool of quasi slave labor, or to exclude the masses of migrants and refugees at our border; that is incidental and to some degree our concentration camps and abduction and deportation forces, ICE and the Border Patrol, are a Potemkin village display for political advantage; what the plutocrats and oligarchs who own America want differs from the fear-driven motives of the racists and white supremacist terrorists who are their deniable assets and form the voting base of their Republican political managerial class; to maintain the illegality and invisible, exploitable nature of migrant labor.

     And there is only one cure for this racist program of enslavement and capitalist exploitation; grant citizenship by declaration to all who so claim membership in our society as co-owners of our government in a free society of equals.

     If you’re crazy enough to want to be one of us, who are we to say no?

     As I wrote in my post of July 24 2022, In a Free Society of Equals. Who Confers Citizenship? Abolish Borders and Enact Citizenship By Declaration; Along our border with Mexico, concentration camps for nonwhite refugees instead of sanctuary, and a brutal army of slavecatchers and overseers of prison bond labor instead of humanitarian aid and safe conduct.

    We will not begin to become human until we build bridges, not walls.

    Let us enact diversity and inclusion rather than divisions of exclusionary otherness and hierarchies of belonging and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege.

     Let us abolish borders and enact citizenship by declaration.

    America has drawn a line in the sand to weaponize economic disparity in service to imperial dominion through labor exploitation of peoples with no legal status, for profit requires slavery as an invisible caste with whom one may do anything at all with impunity as if they do not exist. Here in our border with Mexico, its walls and cages, and in the omnipresent bodies of those who pick and serve our food, clean our living spaces, care for our children and elders, like the black clad stage handlers of a kabuki theatre of capitalism, or the Black Gang who stoke the engines of our system with the fuel of their lives as in Eugene O’Neil’s play The Hairy Ape, we find an immediate example of our own complicity in the dehumanization and commodification of those whose labor creates our wealth and services our elite privilege.

     For we have made of our world a global prison and slave labor system, an imperial dominion of borders and carceral states of force and control, and of our fellow human beings the parts of a vast machine of wealth and power through theft of public resources.

     We are all Nikolai Gogol’s hero in Diary of a Madman, caught in the wheels of a great machine he services, like Charlie Chaplin in his film Modern Times. But we know that we are trapped and enslaved, and we know how and why; we know the secrets of our condition which our masters would keep silent, and in refusing to be silent we can free ourselves and our fellows. This Michel Foucault called truth telling; a poetic vision of reimagination and sacred calling to pursue the truth which bears transformative power.

     So here I offer all of you words of hope for moments of despair, the horror of meaninglessness, the grief of loss, and the guilt of survivorship.

     Your voice has defied our nothingness, and resounds throughout the chasms of a hostile and dehumanizing world; gathering force and transformative power as it finds a thousand echoes, and begins to awaken refusal to submit to authority and to heal the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.

    The voice of even one human being who bears a wound of humanity which opens him to the pain of others and who places his life in the balance with those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, who in resistance to tyranny and terror, force and control, becomes unconquered and free, such a voice of liberation is unstoppable as the tides, an agent of reimagination and transformation which seizes the gates of our prisons and frees the limitless possibilities of becoming human.

    Despair not and be joyful, for we who are Living Autonomous Zones help others break the chains of their enslavement simply by condition of being as well as action; for we violate norms, transgress boundaries of the Forbidden, expose the lies and illusions of authority, and render the forces of repression powerless to compel obedience.

      This is the primary revolutionary struggle which precedes and underlies all else; the seizure of ownership of ourselves from those who would enslave us.

       In this all who resist subjugation by authority are alike as Living Autonomous Zones, bearing seeds of change; we can say with the figure of Loki; “I am burdened with glorious purpose.” 

     Such is the hope of humankind.      

     As I wrote in my post of March 16 2020, Walls of Hate, Tyranny, and Empire: America’s Global Borders; As we are inundated with the global awakening to fear of the coronavirus pandemic, it becomes clear that this is a natural triggering stressor which parallels a manufactured one, that of borders and refugee crises, in its behaviors and effects in our social and political environment as leverage for nationalist and fascist tyrannies of force and control in the subversion of democracy and the transformation of our world into a vast prison.

    Overwhelming and generalized fear is a necessary precondition of authoritarian regimes, and of violence and the use of social force generally, which together with submission to authority may be regarded as a First Cause of the disease of power in the sense that Thomas Aquinas argued causality and being; ” If there is no first cause, then the universe is like a great chain with many links; each link is held up by the link above it, but the whole chain is held up by nothing.”

     Authority and fear also alienate us from ourselves, dehumanize and commodify us as does capitalism as its outer form; for this is about the theft of our identity and power by those who would enslave us.

      The first consequence of the emergence of authority and the disempowerment of its subjects is the modern pathology of disconnectedness; and this is the link which binds authority and tyranny together, and its weak point. Here is where resistance and revolution must act to shatter the knot of interdependent and mutually reinforcing systems which rob us of our humanity and our freedom.

     We must build bridges not walls, togetherness not isolation, unity not division, and forge a borderless world and a free society of equals.

     Todd Miller describes America’s empire of borders in a Jacobin interview; “Since coming into office, the Trump administration has launched unrelenting racist attacks on immigrants and refugees. He seems determined to build his wall by any means necessary and has unleashed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to conduct raids, arrest people, throw them in concentration camps, and deport them.”

    “ But, contrary to widespread liberal illusions, Trump did not start this war on migrants, but only intensified it.

     In fact, as Todd Miller demonstrates in his new book, Empire of Borders, politicians in both major parties have collaborated over the last few decades to construct a massive border regime that polices migrants not only in the United States but throughout the world. In this interview with Jacobin contributor Ashley Smith, Miller discusses the origins and features of this new imperial strategy — and the international resistance against it.

     AS

     One of the points you make throughout your book is that this border regime did not begin with Trump but has been a feature of the United States from its founding. How has the US state internationalized its border regime over the last few decades, and how does it operate today?

     TM

     The US state established its borders through colonization, dispossession, genocide, slavery, and exploitation. This is especially true of its border with Mexico in the nineteenth century.

     That violent process of conquest is too often legitimized by mainstream historians when they use innocuous-sounding phrases like “westward expansion,” dress up imperial bullying like the Gadsden Purchase as “agreements,” and craft self-congratulatory accounts of the Mexican-American War.

     But there is no way to make the white supremacy of “manifest destiny” palatable. The United States seized land, planted its flag, and killed anyone that resisted, especially indigenous peoples, all in the name of God and European civilization.

     It expanded its border regime through its imperial seizure of Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines in the 1898 Spanish-American War. By the early twentieth century, the United States had established its territorial border, set up semicolonies, and policed seemingly independent states in its hemisphere with “gunboat diplomacy.”

     Even knowing this history, it took me a while to understand that the US border extended well beyond its mainland. I think the first time I grasped this was while covering the migration out of Haiti after the devastating earthquake in 2010. I quickly realized that this was not a migration story but a border story.

     Shortly after the earthquake, as hundreds of thousands of people were still in the rubble of their homes, a US jumbo jet flew overhead blasting out an announcement from the Haitian ambassador. He warned in Creole, “If you think you will reach the United States and all the doors will be wide open to you, that’s not at all the case. They will intercept you right in the water and send you back home where you came from.”

     Soon after, sixteen Coast Guard cutters came right up to the Haitian shore to stop the flight of any refugees. Then Washington contracted the private prison company GEO Group for “guard services” (presumably in a tent city in Guantánamo Bay) to in effect jail the victims.

     At once I saw that the US border was: 1) geographically removed from where I normally had thought it was; 2) elastic and able to extend at will very far from the US mainland; and 3) not passive, but aggressive. In a nutshell, the border was much bigger — much, much bigger — than I ever thought it was.

     For example, in 2012, when I was on an investigative trip to Puerto Rico, I learned that the tiny Mona Island — a mere thirty miles from the Dominican shore — was also literally part of the US border.

     So when a sinking boat carrying Haitians to another destination crashed onto the shores of that small island, they were absorbed by the US border: detained, arrested, incarcerated, and eventually deported by the US Department of Homeland Security back to Haiti.

     This is just one instance. Another is the Dominican Border Patrol, which the United States trained and equipped after its creation in 2007. And a third is Guatemala’s new Chorti border patrol, which the US Embassy, one commander told me, helped create to police its Honduran borderlands.

     This wasn’t limited just to the Western Hemisphere. On other trips I found out that US funds created a Kenyan border patrol and a massive surveillance system on the Jordanian-Syrian border. And this is just scratching the surface.

     To understand this, I think it’s important to go back to the 9/11 Commission Report’s paradigm-changing statement: “The American Homeland is the planet.” Since 2003, CBP has created twenty-three embassy attaches from Nairobi to Tokyo to Berlin to Brasilia and is at work in nearly one hundred countries through various border programs — creating, essentially, an empire of borders.

     While the United States has always had such international border operations, it dramatically expanded them after 9/11. When I asked one CBP official at its Washington headquarters to describe with one word how much they’ve grown since then, he answered: “exponentially.”

     AS

     So that’s how the United States controls the global flow of people. How do its policies cause migration to begin with?

     TM

     Washington’s climate, economic, and military policies bear an enormous responsibility for creating the conditions that drive people from their countries. The United States has long been history’s top emitter of greenhouse gases (since 1900 it has emitted nearly seven hundred times more than Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador combined), driving up temperatures, causing desertification, raising sea levels, exacerbating preexisting situations (often of intense poverty, especially in rural areas), effectively making it a force behind displacement.

     While borders have been hardened to deter, arrest, incarcerate, expel, and ultimately sort and classify the world’s most vulnerable people, destructive forces that cause migration can go where they please. One example of this is the “open border” policy in place for the US military.

     With its forces deployed in over eight hundred bases around the world, Washington has conducted countless military interventions and coups, leading people to flee to other countries for safety. For example, in 1954 the United States intervened in Guatemala to overthrow the democratically elected government of Jacobo Arbenz, resulting in a thirty-six-year armed conflict and brutal military repression.

     Another example is Washington-driven neoliberal economics. It has forced indebted countries to privatize state-owned companies, slash their welfare states, and open up their economies to US multinationals. While that made money for local and international capitalists, it wrecked the lives of small farmers and workers, many of whom left their countries for the United States and other advanced capitalist countries to find work as criminalized cheap labor.

     And if countries didn’t agree to neoliberalism, the United States often forced it upon them at gunpoint. If you look in Central America, Mexico, all around the world, this convergence of military and neoliberal policies has both done considerable damage and caused massive displacement of people.

     As the New York Times’s Thomas Friedman wrote so presciently and unselfconsciously in 1999, for the “hidden hand of the market” to work you need the “hidden fist” of the military to back it up and enforce it. And part of that hidden fist is the border regime that polices the migrants and refugees at its borders.

     AS

     This border regime, as you argue in your book, has generated a booming new industry in border security. What does this look like, and how does it intensify the attack on migrants in the United States and throughout the world?

     TM

     The US empire of borders has spawned a whole new dimension of carceral capitalism. It’s raking in enormous profits off the proliferation of walls, surveillance technology, checkpoints, and detention facilities.

     When I was traveling in Israel and Palestine in 2017 with an international group, a man from South Africa told me that what we were seeing was worse than apartheid era in his country. He made the point that in South Africa, while it was bad from 1948 to the early 1990s, there weren’t all the checkpoints, walls, armed agents and soldiers, and technologies that we were seeing in the occupied territories.

     During that trip we went to one of the biggest weapons and technology conferences in Israel. In the Tel Aviv convention center, Israeli companies pitched “proven” technologies, which they boasted had been tested on Palestinians under occupation, to governments from all over the world to police their own borders and oppressed populations.

     At another homeland security expo in Tel Aviv I saw the demonstration of the Orbiter III, which they called the “suicide drone.” The weapons dealer said that it could conduct surveillance on a target, and then, if they so decided, dive-bomb it and utterly destroy it.

     Even though Israel is the “homeland security/surveillance capital” of the world, as scholar Neve Gordon put it, the industry has metastasized throughout the world. I have been to similar border regime bazaars in San Antonio, in Paris, and in Mexico City.

     This whole industry has boomed as states across the globe have built more than seventy border walls (up from fifteen in 1989 after the fall of the Berlin Wall), spent billions on surveillance technologies, and hired hundreds of thousands of armed agents to guard the jagged frontier of the Global North and Global South. Corporations are profiting off border policing, adding crass capitalist interest to crude state repression.

      AS

     What are the domestic impacts of the border regime in the United States? How has it created a new caste division in the working class, deepened racial divisions, and built a state more prepared to repress its population?

     TM

     Border regimes, by their very nature, are systems of exclusion. They are enforced not only by guards but bureaucracies that oversee elaborate rules intended to make noncitizens work hard for their papers as if they were gaining membership to an exclusive club.

     In this sense, the border is much more than the international boundary line. In the United States, the border zone, or jurisdiction, extends a hundred miles inland along the 2,000-mile Mexican border, 4,000-mile Canadian border, and both coasts. That’s a good swath of country where Homeland Security forces operates in what the American Civil Liberties Union has called a “constitution-free zone.”

     Over 200 million people, approximately two-thirds of the US population, live in this zone, where the Border Patrol can set up checkpoints, do roving patrols, work with local and state police, and racially profile and target people for arrest, detention, and deportation. Over the last twenty-five years, the number of agents has ballooned from 4,000 to 21,000, and annual budgets have gone up from $1.5 billion in 1994 to $23 billion in 2018. Detention centers now exceed 250 and can be found throughout the country.

     This massive apparatus is only growing larger and becoming more invasive. For example, the Department of Homeland Security has been testing new small- and medium-sized drones with the ability to “fly unnoticed by human hearing and sight” along a “predetermined route observing and reporting unusual activity and identifying faces and vehicles involved in that activity comparing them to profile pictures and license plate data.”

     All of this amounts to a gargantuan, and profitable, exclusion apparatus, effectively creating a modern caste system that extends throughout the country and indeed the globe.

     AS

     Amid the struggle to close down Trump’s concentration camps, activists are again debating what we should demand. Why should we call for an end to the border regime and open borders?

     TM

     I was just listening to a podcast featuring Vox founder Ezra Klein, who said that he would be open to an argument for open borders if it were shown that it would not destabilize the country. Of course, Klein isn’t the only one with that view, it’s a mainstream one in many ways.

     However, what I think is the exact opposite. Hardened borders exist and are proliferating to police a world precisely because the global situation is already precarious and unstable. As I mentioned before, Washington’s climate, economic, and military policies (and to take it further, those of border-building Western regimes such as the European Union and Australia) have wrecked whole sections of the world.

     When the United States responds to these people by militarizing the border, it only exacerbates the instability. It doesn’t solve the causes of migration but locks them in place; creates chaos at the border, especially for migrants; stimulates corporate investment in the border regime; compromises our civil rights and liberties; and encourages demagogues like Trump to whip up xenophobia and racism.

     I think of the Palestinian artist Khaled Jarrar who, after removing a piece of the US-Mexico border wall near San Diego, said “I will not accept that this wall is in my face.” The whole purpose of Jarrar’s art is not only to dismantle a border apparatus, but also to transform into something more utilitarian.

     For example, he pounded a sledgehammer into the concrete wall that separated west from east Jerusalem, took out chunks of cement, and turned them into sculptures of soccer balls and cleats to give back to the kids whose soccer fields the wall had taken away. I often think of Jarrar’s question: why do we accept that these borders are in our face?

     It is akin to accepting a global caste system, a system of segregation long rejected by civil rights movements and internationally condemned by anti-apartheid movements. The one silver lining in the age of Trump is that his racist attacks on refugees and migrants has produced a new movement to challenge and dismantle the global border regime.’

Empire of Borders: How the US is Exporting its Border Around the World, by Todd Miller

http://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/10/todd-miller-empire-of-borders-immigration-trump

Jacobin Interview

http://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/10/todd-miller-empire-of-borders-immigration-trump

Peter Gabriel’s Games Without Frontiers becomes a song not of the horrors of universalized forever wars, but of liberation from the social use of force by abandoning the hills on which we fly our flags, including the flags of our skins.

Eugene O’Neil’s The Hairy Ape

Charlie Chaplin in The Factory

Diary of a Madman, by Nikolai Gogol

Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia, by Michel Foucault

https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/17/politics/gallery/migrants-texas-bridge-us-border/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/02/us/hate-crimes-latinos-el-paso-shooting/index.html

https://time.com/5874088/el-paso-shooting-racism/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/aug/03/el-paso-shooting-texas-one-year-anniversary

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/08/03/el-paso-walmart-shooting-racist-motive-behind-attack/5556903002/

August 2 2024 Anniversary of the Trump Indictment For Insurrection, Treason, Subversion of Democracy, and Conspiracy To Overturn the 2020 Election

We remember this first anniversary of the trial of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump indicted on four counts of attempts to overturn the 2020 election and seize control of the state as a tyrant of the Fourth Reich’s white supremacist terror and theocratic-patriarchal sexual terror.

     This anniversary is shadowed by Trump’s performance of his signature Theatre of Cruelty in an interview with Black journalists, where his contempt for women and nonwhite people and for the ideals, values, and institutions of democracy was on full display, along with his vacuous idiocy, arrogance, trivial bluster, entitlement and delusions of grandeur; but by now I believe we can stipulate the psychopathy of Trump the rapist who would be king.

     But if there is darkness which seethes among us like an annihilating leprous swarm of Christian Identity fascism, there is also light and hope for the Restoration of America; Biden and Harris have brought home our journalists imprisoned in Russia by Trump’s puppetmaster, and the sanctity of journalism as a sacred calling in pursuit of truth has been re-established.

       There can be no greater and more clear and immediate image of the choices we now face in our election and in choosing a vision of a future America; of liberty and tyranny, loyalty and treason, good and evil, Democrat or Republican versions of ourselves.

     Let us act in Solidarity as guarantors of each others freedoms and universal human rights, to forge a free society of equals which upholds our uniqueness in a diverse and inclusive civilization, and elect Kamala Harris as our next President. Let us choose not masters and tyrants to subjugate us, but champions to liberate us.

     As I wrote in my post of August 2 2023, Strike Three For Trump and the Party of Treason; We remain a chiaroscuro of darkness and light; we Americans, we human beings. Such boundaries define us, written in blood; I hope that one day these may also become interfaces.

      As I wrote in my post of February 11 2021, Profiles in Treason and Terror; The dishonorable and the mad, the delusional and the sadistic epicures of brutality and perversions, the feral predators hooting and champing before the gallows and guillotines they have brought to murder members of congress with and their partners in uniform unleashing racist terror and gun violence in the streets, and the amoral and predatory grifters and puppetmasters of fascism who have subjugated and enslaved them and stolen their honor and their souls; these are among the idolators of Traitor Trump who conspired, enabled, and collaborated in his plot to subvert democracy and overthrow America in the January 6 Insurrection which attempted to seize Congress and execute its members, which like Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch on which it was modeled was intended to decapitate the government of the people in a single stroke.

     As details emerge of the internal operations and massive scale of the plot against America, in terms of its central coordination and logistics under direct operational command of Trump and his cabal of conspirators, we are offered not only the spectacle of his aberrance and monstrosity as a mad idiot Clown of Terror drooling and gloating in bestial depravity at the destruction of our values and institutions, the violation of our ideals and the endless suffering he has caused, but of those of his freakish and degenerate followers as well.

      As I wrote in my post of June 13 2023, The Monster Brought to Judgement; Rejoice with me in the spectacle of the monster brought to judgement, his numberless crimes and perversions and those of his treasonous and dishonorable minions and collaborators in a loathsome regime of patriarchal sexual terror and white supremacist terror as theocratic fascism and tyranny, designed and perpetrated for the purposes of infiltration and subversion of democracy and capture of the state, are displayed before the stage of history and the world as defining limits of the human and branded into the soul of America.

     Like the thief’s brand of Milady de Winter in Alexandre Dumas’ The Three Musketeers, may the actions of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, forever remind us who the enemies of Liberty truly are, regardless of the masks they wear and the web of lies in which they seek to trap us as the raw material of their power.

    Saboteurs of our justice system and agents of the Fourth Reich have conspired to deny us a public viewing of the trial, a trial whose functions are not limited to the espionage of one Russian agent and ex President, but include the restoration of the legitimacy of the justice system, of America as both state and idea, and of democracy globally.

    We must see the monster disempowered to harm us, exposed and cast out, if we are to find catharsis in this morality play, for Trump is a figure of the diseased heart of America as a Sin Eater for all of his followers and those who voted for him and his policies of division and theft of the soul. We must purge our destroyers from among us; most especially those who once believed his lies and enabled him as voters and co-conspirators including the whole of the Republican Party must now be granted the chance to disavow him and free themselves of their subjugation to theocratic fascism, or be judged with him by history.

     This process of catharsis and the Restoration of America is by now two and a half years along since the January 6 Insurrection marked the high tide and collapse of fascism in America, progress we can measure by the few supporters who came to the trial in response to Trump’s dogwhistled orders to storm the court as a demonstration of power, as compared to the masses who perpetrated the storming of Congress in the Insurrection. Trump is still proclaiming madness and issuing terroristic commands, but almost no one is listening anymore.

     The tide of fascist tyranny and terror in America has turned, and now is the time to bring a Reckoning for its evils.

     For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.

     As I wrote in my post of March 30 2023 ,Victory For America and Democracy: the Indictment of Traitor Trump; Jubilation and dancing in the streets erupts across America as the most dangerous foreign agent to ever attack our nation in the capture of the state with the Stolen Election of 2016 is indicted for illegal hush money payoffs to a prostitute; not yet for his trafficking of the stolen migrant children, the political assassination of our Antifa comrade Michael Reinoehl, the abduction and torture of Black Lives Matter protestors by Homeland Security’s army of occupation, his six coup attempts ending with the January 6 Insurrection, or treason in the subversion of democracy, but such a Reckoning will come.

     This is the first step of Trump’s descent into hell, where he will join his buddy Epstein and his idol Hitler.

      I will remember always the moment when I realized Trump is actually an enemy agent and not merely a vile buffoon; watching as he took his Oath of Office swearing to uphold the Constitution and defend America from all enemies foreign and domestic, while Russian bombs fell on the American servicemen he had abandoned to their deaths in Syria.

      Of Trump’s regime and the Fourth Reich we may say as Mark Twain did of the French Revolution and the epochal system of unequal power as monarchy which it overthrew; “THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.”

      How shall future histories of the American Fourth Reich and the tyranny and terror of Traitor Trump’s Russian puppet regime remember and characterize him as its figurehead?

     As I wrote in my post of June 29 2020, Traitor Trump, Bad Monkey William Barr, and the Subversion of the Rule of Law; Bad Monkey Barr gibbers and champs in his cage, rattling the bars and hurling scoops of his poo at the visitors. Trump the Incorrigible Brat makes faces and taunts him, spurring him on to displays of vicious foulness and depravity, alike in their embrace of the power to hurt others and thereby elevate themselves in vainglorious drooling dominance through fear.

    Trump the Clown of Terror and his pet beast of pain and despair William Barr; carnival sideshow freaks of like nature, Trump upon his golden toilet of self-aggrandizement and Barr scampering at his feet and uttering perversions for treats.

    Stay well back from the cage, children; the President grabs. His every action is calculated to generate helplessness from his victims, his strategies of politics an elaborate ritual of personal superiority through the submission of others which he offers to the demons which possess him, whispering their incantations of violation and depravity in the hollow rottenness beneath his orange painted husk of illusions and lies.

    Such is the true purpose and intention of Trump’s psychopathic game of power as the figurehead of a fascist tyranny of white supremacist terror, misogynistic patriarchy and theocratic Gideonite fundamentalism, and plutocratic disaster capitalism, of authoritarian force and control and the subversion of democracy, in his monstrous acts of treason against our values and institutions of freedom, equality, truth, and justice; the destruction of America and of liberty and the universal human rights we are heir to throughout the world and from the future possibilities of becoming human.

     Trump and his fascist conspirators and enablers want nothing less than to devour our souls and enslave us, beginning with the capture of America as a Theatre of Cruelty and the abandonment of our historic role as a guarantor of democracy and the Rights of Man.

     In the darkness of his warrens beneath the White House, Trump howls and lashes out in rage through his proxies like William Barr, who with somersaults of avarice joins him in a delirium of madness and evil. From his lair and cabal of intimates Trump’s Sith-like influence ripples out through networks of master-disciple relationships to engulf our nation and our world in a vast web of deceit, and this network of secret power must be fought on its own terms with exposure and mass action.

     As I wrote in my post of June 9 2023, We Celebrate the Indictment of Traitor Trump, Russian Spy and Most Effective Enemy Agent Ever to Attack America, For Espionage in the Theft of State Secrets; How do you spell Trump? Treason, Racism, Untruth, Misogyny, Predator.

      Take a moment to savour with me the indictment of Trump for the crime of espionage. Ahhh, the bliss.

      A commentator on MSN’s Eleventh Hour this night pronounced the magic words which I hope will awaken our nation from the long nightmare of capture by the Fourth Reich; “I think Trump is done.”

     It has been a fairytale from which we may learn many kinds of morals, a story which begins in the 1980 capture of the Republican Party by Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority movement as a fundamentalist theocracy and the Presidency of its figurehead Ronald Reagan and the Mayan Genocide they unleashed together, and found its true form in the Presidency of a pedophile rapist and Russian agent who for years slept with a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf on his nightstand in place of a Bible.

      Here in the trial of Traitor Trump is a morality play which is also a Rashomon Gate of our possible futures, for it is more than a legal last stand of the rule of law and the idea of democracy in America against a rigged electoral process which offers capture of the state to its enemies, but also a trial of democracy in America and of our infiltrated and subverted justice system whose court of ultimate appeal is a Supreme Court which is become a whorehouse.    

      What is the meaning of the Trump regime in the story of America and our future possibilities of becoming human as a free society of equals?

       As I wrote in my post of November 5 2020. Trump’s Last Coup Attempt and Subversion of Democracy as His Ship of Fools Sinks in Pathetic Failure;  As Trump’s Ship of Fools comes apart at the seams and sinks beneath the waves in pathetic failure, our Clown of Terror collapses in infantile tantrums and tries to take democracy down with him, a final gesture of madness and idiocy in his delusional quest to subvert our values and institutions of liberty and seize tyrannical power.

     We must never forget how close we came to a repeat of the 1933 German Federal Election that set Hitler on the path to a tyranny of absolute power; this is clearly the most important electoral event in the history of humankind since then, and the two elections are terrifyingly parallel. Trump tried three times to use the Black Lives Matter protests to create fear and legitimize the federal occupation of America under the pretext of re-establishing law and order in an exact duplication of Hitler’s successful strategy using the Reichstag Fire, and failed.

     We have escaped the jaws of the Fourth Reich which have held us fast for four years, since the Stolen Election of 2016, while Trump and his cabal of Gideonite fundamentalist patriarchs, white supremacist terrorists, and plutocratic robber barons have violated everything about America which is noble and true, plundered the public wealth, dehumanized and divided us, sabotaged and subverted the institutions of our freedom, equality, truth, and justice, betrayed our allies and emboldened our foes, lost the American hegemony of global power and privilege and our position as a guarantor of democracy and universal human rights and a beacon of hope to the world.

     Let us never forget the bottomless depravities, treasons, and amoral predation and greed of Trump’s many enablers and conspirators in the Fall of America as we struggle in the years ahead to reclaim our nation and our souls. We must hold them to account, but we must also reimagine our society and the many systemic and structural flaws by which we came to this broken and lost state.

      As I wrote in my post of June 9 2022, The Greatest Show on Earth: Presenting the January 6 Committee; Tonight our puppets will dance upon the stage of history and our imaginations, while a chiaroscuro of light as truth and democracy versus darkness as fascist tyranny and falsification, lies, illusions, rewritten histories, alternate realities, conspiracy theories and propaganda play for the kingdom of our souls and the fate of America and the world.

     Who do we want to become, we humans? A free society of equals or a prison planet of masters and slaves?

     Now begins a great Reckoning, and we shall see.

     As I wrote in my post of February 10 2021, Treason, Tyranny, and Terror on Trial: As the Second Impeachment of Traitor Trump Begins, I Submit Charges Before the People’s Tribunal of Crimes Against Humanity for Which Trump and His Collaborators Should Now Be On Trial; Among the many crimes against humanity for which Traitor Trump and his collaborators should be on trial but are not yet include the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Mexican and other nonwhite migrants, the concentration camps at our border, the orphaning and torture of children, and the state tyranny and terror of fascist and racist violence as national policy perpetrated by the ICE and Border Patrol components of Homeland Security, forces of repression which are antidemocratic by their nature and which should be abolished as a top priority of the Restoration of America.

    Just as villainous and reprehensible is the parallel program of racist police violence and the carceral state to re-enslave Black American citizens and enforce systemic forms of inequality and injustice through state terror, repression of dissent, the force of a militarized police and the counterinsurgency model of policing which has transformed our security services into an army of occupation with primarily political objectives, and the control of pervasive and endemic surveillance and propaganda, lies, illusions, and subversions of the truth.

     Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, and his circus of fools, degenerates, and barbarians, his enablers and collaborators both within the government and his shadow forces rallying under the Confederate flag to bring violence and insurrection to our nations capital and to the streets of our cities throughout America, are co-conspirators and instigators in the murders of every Black American killed by police shooting or other racist violence since its authorization by Trump in the wake of Charlottesville.

      And every missing child kidnapped by the state and disappeared into what abominable slavery or human trafficking designed in the diseased imagination of Trump and his Epstein buddies we know not of, every migrant of the huddled masses yearning to be free who died in the quest to reach the safety of America because the water caches had been intentionally sabotaged by criminals in the uniform of our nation who were “just following orders” like their counterparts in the SS during the Holocaust, every prisoner who died in custody because they were denied water or medical care; the blood of these and countless other victims of Trump’s narcissistic self-aggrandizement and regime of fascist corruption, racism, and patriarchal sexual terror is on the hands of every  Republican who voted for him and fails now in this trial to repudiate him publicly and renounce his works as among those of the devils which he serves.

     For in his actions Trump has been not only a foreign agent and Putin’s puppet whose mission is the subversion of democracy and the Fall of America, but also a slave of Moloch the Seducer, Demon of Lies, in that he is not merely a pathological liar but also an idiot madman who cannot distinguish truth from lies, and who has weaponized his delusions and psychopathy as instruments of our falsification and subjugation in his quest for tyrannical power.

     The bizarre and lurid dark fairytales of the QAnon conspiracy theory movement, like the charges of the Inquisition and the Nazis which othered witches and Jews on which QAnon is constructed, serves as deflection from Trump’s loathsome perversions and sexual terrorism. What terrors did he conceal behind the beauty pageant and modeling syndicate he once controlled?

     His Stop the Steal campaign is a similar deflection which shields him from inquiry into the Stolen Election of 2016 and the fact that his Presidency was entirely illegitimate and due to Russian interference; it was also the rhetorical and organizational basis of his final attempted coup on January 6, for which he is now being impeached for the second time.

     We must cast out the monsters from among us, the racists and white supremacist terrorists, the Gideonite fundamentalists and patriarchs of Christian Identity fascism and sexual terror, and the amoral forces of repression of those who would enslave us and who enforce hegemonies of elite power and privilege and hierarchies of exclusionary otherness armed with guns and badges and the authority of a government which has been infiltrated by the Fourth Reich, an implacable and relentless enemy which has come just short of seizing us in its jaws.

     We must give fascism no second chances.

     As written by Nick Visser in Huffpost, in an article entitled 7 Key Takeaways From Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 Indictment; “ormer President Donald Trump has been indicted over his attempt to remain in power after he lost the 2020 presidential election, yet another moment of reckoning amid a torrent of criminal charges.

     Trump faces four felony charges as part of a sweeping, 45-page indictment filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team of investigators accused the former president of multiple conspiracies to defraud the United States, to obstruct an official proceeding and to deprive people of their right to vote and have that vote counted under the Constitution.

    1. Trump knew his claims were false but spread them anyway to create an “intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger.”

Prosecutors note that Trump, like every American, had the right to speak publicly about the election “and even to claim, falsely,” that there had been “outcome-determinative fraud.”

     But his efforts became unlawful when he moved to defraud the United States and attempt to subvert the process of collecting, counting and certifying the election results. That plan, the indictment says, included a multi-prong approach to spread lies, install slates of fake electors in swing states and convince election officials and then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the will of the people.

     “Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power,” the indictment says.

     2. The indictment identifies six co-conspirators.

Trump was aided in his effort to overturn the 2020 election by six unnamed co-conspirators, the indictment says.

     Five of them are identifiable through details and information provided in the filing documents:

     1. Rudy Giuliani is listed as “an attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies that the Defendant’s 2020 re-election campaign attorneys would not.”

     2. John Eastman is listed as “an attorney who devised and attempted to implement a strategy to leverage the Vice President’s ceremonial role overseeing the certification proceeding to obstruct the certification of the presidential election.”

     3. Sidney Powell is listed as “an attorney whose unfounded claims of election fraud the Defendant privately acknowledged to others sounded ‘crazy.’”

     4. Jeffrey Clark is identified as “a Justice Department official who worked on civil matters and who, with the Defendant, attempted to use the Justice Department to open sham election crime investigations and influence state legislatures with knowingly false claims of election fraud.”

     5. Kenneth Chesebro is listed as “an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.”

     6. The sixth co-conspirator is so far unknown but is identified as “a political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.”

     3. People in Trump’s orbit repeatedly told him there was no evidence of voter fraud.

     The indictment alleges Trump and his co-conspirators made repeated, “prolific” claims of election fraud despite knowing they were false. Prosecutors say that Trump was repeatedly told by his inner circle his claims were untrue but that he “deliberately disregarded the truth.”

     Smith’s team pointed to conversations Trump had with Vice President Mike Pence, senior leaders at the Justice Department, the director of national intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security and many aides, White House attorneys and campaign staffers, all of whom said his claims were unsubstantiated.

     4. Trump acknowledged claims about election fraud and voting machines pushed by a co-conspirator sounded “crazy.”

The indictment notes that even as Trump’s legal advisers were working to undercut election results in Georgia, he knew the claims were unfounded and even described Co-Conspirator 3’s plan as “crazy.”

     That sentiment spread through Trump’s close advisers as the effort to install slates of fake electors in swing states began in force in an effort to obstruct a true count of the Electoral College votes.

     “Here’s the thing the way this has morphed it’s a crazy play so I don’t know who wants to put their name on it,” Trump’s deputy campaign manager at the time texted to other aides. No one agreed to put their name on the plan as they couldn’t “stand by it.”

    5. Trump pressured the Justice Department to support him and threatened to remove those who refused to go along with his plan.

Trump repeatedly tried to get the Department of Justice to support his false claims of election fraud, “thus giving the Defendant’s lies the backing of the federal government.” But the acting attorney general and acting deputy attorney general both refused, saying the agency would not and could not change the outcome of the election.

     “Just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen,” Trump replied, the indictment says.

     The former president then attempted to install Co-Conspirator 4 as acting attorney general to help further the plot. Trump backed down after many in the White House threatened a mass resignation.

      6. Pence’s notes helped the special counsel craft his case.

Trump heavily pressured Pence to support his effort to remain in power and reject the ceremonial certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the election.

Prosecutors pieced together details of Trump’s conversations and thinking around the time using Pence’s “contemporaneous notes” in the days leading up to Jan. 6.

     The vice president rejected Trump’s attempts, telling him to his face that he didn’t believe he had the authority to do what Trump asked.

     Trump later told Pence that he would have to publicly criticize him, the indictment says, which prompted his chief of staff to inform the Secret Service about fears for Pence’s safety.

     7. Trump waited and watched on TV as his supporters stormed the Capitol.

The indictment claims Trump exploited the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and resisted pleas from his aides and supporters to speak out as the insurrection grew.

     “When advisors urged the Defendant to issue a calming message aimed at the rioters, the Defendant refused, instead repeatedly remarking that the people at the Capitol were angry because the election had been stolen,” the document says.”

          As written by Heather Cox Richardson in her newsletter of August 2; “There have been more developments today surrounding yesterday’s indictment of former president Trump for conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding as he tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election and install himself in office over the wishes of the American people.

     Observers today called out the part of the indictment that describes how Trump and Co-Conspirator 4, who appears to be Jeffrey Clark, the man Trump wanted to make attorney general, intended to use the military to quell any protests against Trump’s overturning of the election results. When warned that staying in power would lead to “riots in every major city in the United States,” Co-Conspirator 4 replied, “Well…that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.”

     The Insurrection Act of 1807 permits the president to use the military to enforce domestic laws, invoking martial law. Trump’s allies urged him to do just that to stay in power. Fears that Trump might do such a thing were strong enough that on January 3, 2021, all 10 living former defense secretaries signed a Washington Post op-ed warning that “[e]fforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory.”

     They put their colleagues on notice: “Civilian and military officials who direct or carry out such measures would be accountable, including potentially facing criminal penalties, for the grave consequences of their actions on our republic.” Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo recalled today that military leaders told Congress they were reluctant to respond to the violence at the Capitol out of concern about how Trump might use the military under the Insurrection Act.

     Political pollster Tom Bonier wrote: “I understand Trump fatigue, but it feels like the president and his advisors preparing to use the military to quash protests against his planned coup should be bigger news. Especially when that same guy is in the midst of a somewhat credible comeback effort.”

     On The Beat tonight, Ari Melber connected Trump Co-Conspirator John Eastman to Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). Just before midnight on January 6, 2021, after the attack on the U.S. Capitol, Eastman wrote to Pence’s lawyer to beg him to get Pence to adjourn Congress “for 10 days to allow the legislatures to finish their investigations, as well as to allow a full forensic audit of the massive amount of illegal activity that has occurred here.” On the floor of the Senate at about the same time, Cruz, who voted against certification, used very similar language when he called for “a ten-day emergency audit.”

     An email sent by Co-Conspirator 6, the political consultant, matches one sent from Boris Epshteyn to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, suggesting that Epshteyn is Co-Conspirator 6. The Russian-born Epshteyn has been with Trump’s political organization since 2016 and was involved in organizing the slates of false electors in 2020. Along with political consultant Steve Bannon, Epshteyn created a cryptocurrency called “$FJB, which officially stands for “Freedom. Jobs. Business.” but which they marketed to Trump loyalists as “F*ck Joe Biden.” By February 2023, Nikki McCann Ramirez reported in Rolling Stone that the currency had lost 95% of its value.

     Since the indictment became public, Trump loyalists have insisted that the Department of Justice is attacking Trump’s First Amendment rights to free speech. Indeed, if Giuliani’s unhinged appearance on Newsmax last night is any indication, it appears that has been their strategy all along. Aside from the obvious limit that the First Amendment does not cover criminal behavior, the grand jury sidestepped this issue by acknowledging that Trump had a right to lie about his election loss. It indicted him for unlawfully trying to obstruct an official proceeding and to disenfranchise voters.

      Today, Trump’s former attorney general William Barr dismissed the idea that the indictment is an attack on Trump’s First Amendment rights. Barr told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “As the indictment says, they’re not attacking his First Amendment right. He can say whatever he wants. He can even lie. He can even tell people that the election was stolen when he knew better. But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy. All conspiracies involve speech. And all fraud involves speech. Free speech doesn’t give you the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy.”

     As written by Ed Pilkington in The Guardian, in an article entitled The 45 pages that skewer Trump’s bid to destroy American democracy; “More than 1,000 people charged over the US Capitol riot, millions of pages of evidence compiled by the House January 6 committee, hundreds of hours of depositions of key players – all this has finally been boiled down to a 45-page indictment that accuses Donald Trump of attempting to destroy American democracy.

     “Why didn’t they do this 2.5 years ago?” the former president asked peevishly on Tuesday, shortly before the indictment came down. The answer lies in the document itself: in its painstaking command of detail and in the cool, crisp legal language deployed by special counsel Jack Smith to make his case.

     This is the third time that Trump has been criminally indicted, and to some extent the shock value has worn off. Much of the content of the grand jury indictment filed in a federal court in Washington DC is familiar.

     But no one can doubt the significance of its contents. For the first time in US history, legal charges have been brought against a president for attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power that until 6 January 2021 had stood as a pillar of American values since a defeated John Adams quietly snuck out of the capital on 4 March 1801.

     It’s taken two and a half years, sure, but Smith wastes no time in getting to the point. The second sentence of the indictment reads: “The defendant lost the 2020 presidential election”, taking us straight to that place where Trump so consequentially refused to go – the acceptance that he was a loser.

     By the fourth sentence, it is clear that Smith has no intention of mincing his words. He rolls out the L-word – “lies” – with an ease which belies the months of angst that the editors of American newspapers went through before they felt comfortable enough to attach it to Trump.

     Later, he accuses the former president of “fraud”, a charged word given the sequence of events. It was precisely that word that Trump used as the foundation stone of his bid to overturn the election – his lie that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud –and now it was being directed back at him.

     Smith portrays the former president as a man who was prepared to tear down everything to stay in office. “Despite having lost, the Defendant was determined to remain in power.”

     The Trump who emerges from the 45 pages is a frustrated man who, together with his unnamed and as yet uncharged co-conspirators, unleashed a concerted, relentless and fully conscious plan to subvert the 2020 election. Smith dates the plot to 14 November 2020, the day after Trump’s campaign lawyers had conceded defeat in court in Arizona, signalling that he had lost the presidential election.

     That day, Trump turned to “Co-Conspirator 1” – a clear description of his lawyer Rudy Giuliani who is referenced at least 40 times – and who “executed a strategy to use knowing deceit in the targeted states to impair, obstruct and defeat the federal government function”.

     “Knowing deceit” is critical, as it speaks to Trump’s state of mind that is likely to be a key legal battleground if and when the case goes to trial. Smith devotes pages to the subject, repeatedly underlining the allegation that Trump made “knowingly false claims” of fraud in the casting and counting of votes.

     “These claims were false, and the Defendant knew that they were false,” the document reads. It goes on to list the many people and institutions that directly informed Trump that there was no evidence of fraud, from Vice-President Mike Pence down.

     Familiar though they are, some of the details remain just too delicious for Smith – and by extension the Guardian – not to recount. He recalls that during the notorious call between Trump and Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, in which the president asked him to “find” 11,780 votes, the defendant also claimed that 5,000 dead people had voted.

     “The actual number were two,” Raffensperger replied. “Two. Two people that were dead that voted.”

     The indictment largely follows the roadmap set out by the January 6 committee in its relatively elephantine 845-page final report. It traces the story of the fake electors who were convened in key battleground states lost by Trump in an effort to send illegal false electoral certificates to Congress.

     Smith emphasises the extraordinary lengths to which Trump and his co-conspirators went, filing a petition to the US supreme court from Arizona on 11 December 2020 “as a pretext to claim that litigation was pending in the state”. Giuliani was concerned, the indictment alleges using his “Co-Conspirator 1” moniker, that it “could appear treasonous for the AZ electors to vote if there is no pending court proceeding”.

     Sure enough, all 16 fake electors in Michigan have now been charged by the state attorney general, and further criminal counts are expected soon against some of the fake electors in Georgia.

       The lengths to which the conspirators would go is another searing theme running through the indictment. In a previously untold tableau, we see Co-Conspirator 4, clearly identifiable as the former justice department official and Trump loyalist Jeffrey Clark, confronting a White House lawyer who warned him that if Trump refused to leave the presidency there would be “riots in every major city”.

     “That’s why there’s an Insurrection Act,” Clark is alleged to have replied, alluding to the 1807 provision that empowers the US president to deploy the military to suppress civil disorder.

     There are other surprises in the document. In the passage on the pressure applied on Pence in the run-up to his ceremonial counting of the electoral college votes on January 6, Smith nonchalantly drops in a mention that prosecutors have obtained the former vice-president’s contemporaneous notes.

     That’s a revelation that should send a shiver down the spines of Trump’s defence team.

     We learn, too, that on the day of the US Capitol riot, Trump and Giuliani continued to exploit the violence by calling lawmakers to implore them to delay certification of Joe Biden’s victory. Giuliani was badgering US senators even as late as 7.18pm.

     The one argument that is absent here, significantly perhaps, is any suggestion that Trump personally orchestrated the uprising on January 6. It’s a striking omission, given some of the evidence that was heard by the House committee, including the sensational claim that Trump had tried to grab the wheel of his security vehicle and drive towards the Capitol building as the uprising was under way.

     Its absence, though, points to the careful, cautious tone of the indictment, and to its purpose. Unlike the January 6 committee report, the job of this document is not to lay down a record for history.

     Its task is to make a watertight legal case that Trump committed criminal acts that cut to the quick of the American experiment. There’s a lot riding on it: next year’s presidential election, the future of American democracy and that other consideration – a maximum sentence of 55 years in federal prison.”

     As written in The Guardian’s editorial, entitled The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s new indictment: America needs this trial: A healthy body politic cannot allow its core values and principles to be trashed with impunity; “he indictment served on Donald Trump on Monday marks the beginning of a legal reckoning that is desperately required, if American democracy is to properly free itself from his malign, insidious influence. Mr Trump already faces multiple criminal charges relating to the retention of classified national security documents and the payment of hush money to a porn star. But the gravity of the four counts outlined by the special counsel, Jack Smith, is of a different order of magnitude.

     Mr Trump stands accused of conspiring, in office, to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election. Following Joe Biden’s victory, the indictment states, Mr Trump “knowingly” used false claims of electoral fraud in an attempt “to subvert the legitimate election results”. A bipartisan congressional committee report last year came to similar conclusions and provides much of the basis for the charges. But this represents the first major legal attempt to hold Mr Trump accountable for events leading up to and including the storming of the Capitol by a violent mob on 6 January 2021.

     The stakes could hardly be set higher. Democratic elections and the peaceful transfer of power are the cornerstones of the American republic. The testimony given to Congress indicates that Mr Trump used his authority to try to bully federal and state officials into supporting his claims that the election had been “stolen” from him. Repeatedly told that his assertions were baseless, he then mobilised a hostile crowd on 6 January to intimidate lawmakers charged with ratifying Mr Biden’s victory.

     It is inconceivable that Mr Trump should not be made to answer for actions that imperilled the constitutional and democratic functioning of the United States. The prosecutors’ case will hinge on their ability to prove that he knew his claims of a stolen election were bogus. But beyond the trial itself, it would be foolish to underestimate Mr Trump’s ability to turn even this situation to his own political advantage.

     The legal fronts on which Mr Trump is now engaged will drain his financial resources. But a narrative of victimhood and persecution has become, and will remain, the galvanising theme of his campaign. Two previous criminal indictments saw his poll ratings lift, helping him to establish a huge lead in the race for the Republican presidential nomination for 2024. Whatever the evidence to the contrary, a sizable proportion of American voters will continue to back Mr Trump’s self-serving version of reality.

     One of the most dangerously polarising elections in US history thus looms as, over the next 15 months, Mr Trump uses political cunning to evade the legal net that is closing around him. Through his lawyers, he will do all he can to delay matters, hoping eventually to dictate the course of events from the White House. For his part, Mr Smith said on Monday that the justice department will seek “a speedy trial”.

     It is in the interests of American democracy, to which Mr Trump represents a clear and present danger, that the justice department gets its wish. A healthy body politic cannot allow its founding values and core principles to be trashed with apparent impunity. Prosecutors will need to proceed with care and be alert to the complex political dynamics. But this climactic reckoning in court needs to take place before Mr Trump gets the chance to besmirch the country’s highest office all over again.”

     As written by Moira Donegan in The Guardian, in an article entitled Trump’s indictment proves he might not be bright, but he is dangerous: Donald Trump’s frantic, cynical and preposterous attempts to hang on to power after losing the 2020 election were a dark moment in US history; “In the 1976 political drama All the President’s Men, Robert Redford’s Bob Woodward meets the secretive FBI source, Deep Throat, in a parking garage to ask him what he knows about the Watergate break-in. Deep Throat – in real life, the FBI deputy director Mark Felt – is ominous and taciturn, refusing to say all that he knows. “I have to do this my way,” he tells Redford. “You tell me what you know, and I’ll confirm.” But he offers a blunt assessment of the inner workings of the Nixon administration. “Forget the myths that the media has created about the White House,” Deep Throat tells Woodward. “The truth is these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

     Few moments in history, including the Watergate scandal, have done so much to puncture the dignified mystique of American government as Donald Trump’s frantic, cynical and preposterous attempts to hang on to power after losing the 2020 election. The indictment against him related that effort, unsealed on Tuesday by the office of special counsel Jack Smith, charges Trump with engaging in three conspiracies: to defraud the United States in seeking to overturn the election, to obstruct the government in seeking to derail the January 6 proceedings, and perhaps most meaningfully, to deprive American voters of their right to have their votes counted. The charges are serious; the violence was deadly. But every one of the indictment’s 45 pages evokes Deep Throat’s words: these are not very bright guys.

     The document unsealed on Tuesday charges only Trump. But it also implicates six co-conspirators. These include a justice department official, probably the then assistant attorney general Jeff Clark, along with an unidentified political consultant. Also implicated are four Republican lawyers, seemingly including Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani; the law professor John Eastman, who concocted the false theory that the vice-president had the authority to intervene in the electoral vote counting ceremony; Ken Chesebro, an author of the fake electors scheme; and the quack pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell.

     It was with these accomplices that the special counsel alleges that Donald Trump embarked on a series of frauds, fabrications and cockamamie schemes to reverse the election outcome between November 2020 and early January 2021. That project had multiple successive fronts, with the conspirators moving on to new strategies as the previous ones failed. They tried to use the justice department to pursue frivolous and fraudulent allegations of election malfeasance; then they tried to conscript state officials into advancing false claims of election fraud; then they tried to send fake electors to congress; finally, they tried to stop congress from certifying the election results on January 6.

     All the while, they flooded the media with what the indictment calls “knowingly false” claims that the election was stolen, in the hope of creating public distrust in the election outcome and pressure on the officials who they believed could reverse it. None of these schemes were especially well-thought-out, and none would have been plausible without both a willingness by many Republican officials to lie on Trump’s behalf, and a willingness by many Trump supporters to commit violence. But those, sadly, are not in short supply.

     That Trump and his co-conspirators failed in their effort to subvert the election was largely a matter of luck; that they are now being charged in this most significant of Trump’s crimes was not at all guaranteed.

     Much of what is recounted in the indictment is not new. The facts presented by the special counsel hew closely to those laid out by the House January 6 committee in a series of televised hearings last year, and Smith, like that committee, spends a great deal of time eradicating any doubt about Trump’s state of mind or his certainty that his own statements about the election were false. But the indictment does contain new tidbits of information gleaned from the special counsel’s investigation, ones that make both the incompetence and the malice of the conspiracy plain. Copious testimony and contemporaneous notes provided by Mike Pence, for example, make it clear the extent to which Trump’s former vice-president, against whom he incited a murderous mob, is cooperating with the special counsel. Emails obtained by the investigation also add texture to the story of the election subversion effort. One campaign adviser, tasked with encouraging false claims of election fraud in Georgia, wrote in an email that the allegations being advanced by the Trump camp were “conspiracy shit beamed down from the mothership”. Not exactly the words of a man convinced of the righteousness of his own cause.

     More disturbingly, the indictment reveals the extent to which Trump and his co-conspirators were conscious of the possibility that their actions might lead to violence, and that violence might be required to achieve their goals. This does not seem to have disturbed them, or even to have prompted much hesitation.

     Pence’s lawyers allegedly told John Eastman that if the vice-president usurped the January 6 certification ceremony as Eastman wanted him to, the result would lead to a “disastrous situation” in which the election would “have to be decided in the streets”. On 3 January, just days before the riot, a member of the White House counsel’s office told Jeff Clark that if the president tried to remain in office as planned, there would be “riots in every major city in the United States”. To which Clark allegedly replied: “Well, that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.” Clark was referring to a law that empowers the sitting president to deploy the military to suppress unrest.

     It has long been clear that far-right extremist militia groups, such as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, planned for violence at the Capitol on January 6; it has been less clear the extent to which the Trump camp communicated with these groups, if at all, about the event and that possibility. It was a connection that has long been speculated about, but which the House committee on January 6 did not firmly make, and the special counsel’s indictment doesn’t, either.

     In December 2020, just weeks before Clark’s conversation, the leader of the Oath Keepers had called on Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. This rhyming thinking doesn’t indicate coordination, but it does suggest a sympathy of mind, and of tactics, between the extremist groups and the Trump camp. It is an affinity that will only become clearer if Trump becomes the Republican nominee again, as he is all but certain to. These are not very bright guys, but they’re still quite dangerous ones.”

     What happens next, as Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, fundraises off his indictment and uses it to centralize power in his domination of the Republican Party for his campaign to recapture the state in our next election, and move us nearer to a civil war?

     As written by Robert Reich in The Guardian, in an article entitled Trump is gearing up for his ‘final battle’. So should we; “Not once has Donald Trump veered from his core campaign theme.

     Recall the first rally of his 2024 election campaign on 25 March in Waco, Texas – exactly 30 years after a deadly siege between law enforcement and the Branch Davidians resulted in the deaths of more than 80 members of that religious cult and four federal agents.

     He opened with a choir of men imprisoned for their role in the January 6 insurrection singing “Justice for All”, intercut with the national anthem and with Trump reciting the Pledge of Allegiance with his hand on his heart. Behind, on big screens, was footage from the Capitol riot.

     Trump then repeated his bogus claim that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged”. He praised the rioters of January 6. 

     He raged against the prosecutors overseeing multiple investigations into his conduct as “absolute human scum”. He told the crowd that “the thugs and criminals who are corrupting our justice system will be defeated, discredited and totally disgraced.”

     He then declared:

     “Our enemies are desperate to stop us and our opponents have done everything they can to crush our spirit and to break our will. But they failed. They’ve only made us stronger. And 2024 is the final battle, it’s going to be the big one. You put me back in the White House, their reign will be over and America will be a free nation once again.”

     Since then, as indictments have piled up against him and his poll numbers among Republicans have risen, Trump’s “final battle” comes into ever sharper focus: it is a battle against the rule of law and democracy.

     The mega indictment we have all been waiting for – the indictment against Trump for his attempted coup against the United States – will be announced very soon.

     Trump is prepared to use it in his final battle.

     Tuesday, on an Iowa radio show, he warned it would be “very dangerous” if Special Counsel Jack Smith put him in jail, since his supporters have “much more passion than they had in 2020”.

     Unfortunately for the nation, the Republican party is uniting behind Trump’s side of this battle line.

     If not defending the January 6 rioters outright, Republican lawmakers are attacking Special Counsel Jack Smith, the justice department, the Manhattan district attorney, and other current and prospective prosecutors seeking to hold Trump accountable.

     A Trump indictment for attempting the overthrow of the constitutional order and the verdict of the electorate will guarantee that 2024 will be more of a referendum on Trump than a referendum on Biden, as was the 2020 election.

     It will make it harder for Republican candidates across the nation to focus on their fake nemeses – “woke” teachers and corporations, trans youth, LGBTQ+ people, immigrants and “socialism” – and force them instead to defend Trump’s side in the final battle.

     Trump and the Republicans will lose this battle. Even if they win Republican primaries, they will lose the general election.

     Recall that last November, virtually every 2020-election-denying Republican who sought office in a truly contested election went down to defeat.

     Those who care about democracy and the rule of law should welcome the battle, and not just because it will help Biden and the Democrats.

     It will also help clarify what’s at stake for the nation in 2024 and beyond.

     It will show how eager Trump and the Republican party are to abandon democracy and the rule of law in order to gain power. It will show that the vast majority of Americans reject their position.

     Americans hold different views about many things, but most of us oppose authoritarianism. We reject fascism.

     We value the constitution and the Bill of Rights. We are committed to democracy, even with its many flaws. We support the rule of law.

     We want to live in a nation where no one is above the law. We want to be able to sleep at night without worrying that a president might unleash armed lackeys to drag us out of our homes because he considers us to be his enemy.

     The pustule of Trump has been growing since 2016, and the authoritarian impulses underlying this infection have been allowed to fester for decades.

     Folks, it is finally time to lance this boil. It is time to decidedly rescue democracy and the rule of law. It is time to defeat Trump and his enablers who are determined to defy the core values of America.

     Let the battle begin.”

     As I wrote in my post of June 15 2022, Act Three of the Greatest Show on Earth: Where Do We Go From Here?;  Where do we go from here?

      Democracy in America survived its most terrible moment of peril from internal threat in the January 6 Insurrection, yet here we are, witness to the public exposure of the plot and its treasonous conspirators on television as Congress brings a Reckoning to the Fourth Reich.

      Like the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 on which it was modeled, it failed; but in doing so also achieved all of its strategic goals, moving our great enemy nearer to victory by staging a Lost Cause which established the fascist counternarrative as iconography that Trump remains our legitimate President. Next time, and there will always be a next time, we may not be so lucky.

      Not only do the forces of fascism remain an active threat, through open allegiance to the Lost Cause which echoes horrifically with that of the Confederacy and the KKK whose adherents are among the networks of deniable assets now among us as they were at the Capitol on that fateful day, but the vast resources of wealth and power at their command after seventy years of infiltration of global elites and governments remain undiminished.

      But none of this is relevant to the true threat which fascism poses to us all today; for America has been divided against itself, and as we are warned by Abraham Lincoln in 1858 in his House Divided speech in reference to the synoptic Gospels of Luke 11:17, Mark 3:25, and Matthew 12:25; “If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it.

     We are now far into the fifth year, since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery agitation.

Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only, not ceased, but has constantly augmented.

     In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed –

     “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

     I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free.

     I do not expect the Union to be dissolved – I do not expect the house to fall – but I do expect it will cease to be divided.

     It will become all one thing, or all the other.”

      As we are taught with the lyrics of the song Where Do We Go From Here?, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode 7 of season 6, Once More With Feeling, possibly the greatest musical episode of any telenovela yet created;

 “Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

The battle’s done,

And we kinda won.

So we sound our victory cheer.

Where do we go from here.

Why is the path unclear,

When we know home is near.

Understand we’ll go hand in hand,

But we’ll walk alone in fear. (Tell me)

Tell me where do we go from here.

When does the end appear,

When do the trumpets cheer.

The curtains close, on a kiss god knows,

We can tell the end is near…

Where do we go from here

Where do we go from here

Where do we go

from here?”

       Here is an elegy for the Fall of America, a hymn to a dying hope and the lost grandeur of a fallen nation. When in a distant future the artifacts of our civilization begin to puzzle whatever beings arise from our carrion, and they ask who were the Americans, I hope such music as this lamentation remains to guide their questions.

     Yet hope remains when all is lost, and whether it becomes a gift or a curse is in our hands. These lyrics speak of the modern pathology of disconnectedness, of the division and fracture of our Solidarity, of subjugation through learned helplessness and the dominion of fear. But this is not the end of the story, nor of ours.

     Once More With Feeling ends not with abjection, but with The Kiss, between the Slayer and Spike, one of the monsters she hunts. A very particular kind of monster, who is also the hero of the story in its entire seven year arc; one who is made monstrous by his condition of being and forces beyond his control, against which he struggles for liberation and to recreate and define himself as he chooses, a monster who reclaims his humanity and his soul. This is why we continue to watch the show twenty years after its debut; we are all Spike, locked in titanic struggle for the ownership of ourselves with authorized identities and systemic evils, a revolution of truths written in our flesh against imposed conditions of struggle and orders of human being, meaning, and value.

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer is an allegory of Sartrean freedom in a world without inherent value or meaning, of the joy of total freedom versus the terror of our nothingness, and above all a song of the redemptive power of love to return to us our true selves.

      This is how we defeat fascist tyranny in the long game, after we bring a Reckoning for its crimes against humanity and its subversion of democracy; let us answer hate with love, division with solidarity, fear with hope, and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

America dances with our addiction to power;

 Liberty and Fascist Tyranny, Hope and Fear,

The terror of freedom and the ecstasy of submission

 Hozier – Take Me to Church, Art-project Inspiration. Choreography and directed by Helga Geller

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season 6 episode 7- Once More, with Feeling – Where Do We Go From Here?

Evan Gershkovich release: Biden and Harris greet Americans freed after prisoner swap

Emotional scenes at Andrews air force base as Evan Gershkovich, Paul Whelan and Alsu Kurmasheva step onto American soil

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/02/biden-harris-greet-us-america-russia-prisoner-exchange?fbclid=IwY2xjawEZ-XRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHW3LYfssyfC6JKPEqrNZ25_cogKaHhGxnWJlfejIdojCp1uTLZp9pO2DkQ_aem_ckI2sr54IioyL-kTprGLpA

US reacts to major prisoner swap with Russia: ‘feat of diplomacy’ and ‘joyous’

White House, WSJ and politicians praise Evan Gershkovich and Paul Whelan’s release in a likely political coup for Biden

Incredulous laughter, audible gasps: Trump’s performance at Black journalists’ panel left him exposed

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/31/trump-nabj-black-journalists-chicago

Black journalists respond to ‘disastrous’ Trump panel at annual convention

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/31/nabj-trump-panel-black-journalists-respond

‘It’s not a theoretical proposition’: the ‘war game’ imagining a coup in the US

Trump 2020 election interference case resumes after immunity decision

7 Key Takeaways From Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 Indictment

The 45 pages that skewer Trump’s bid to destroy American democracy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/02/donald-trump-indictment-pages-jack-smith-january-6-election-2020?CMP=share_btn_link

The Guardian view on Donald Trump’s new indictment: America needs this trial | Editorial

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/02/the-guardian-view-on-donald-trumps-new-indictment-america-needs-this-trial?CMP=share_btn_link

Trump’s indictment proves he might not be bright, but he is dangerous

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/02/trump-indictment-jan-6-election-danger?CMP=share_btn_link

Trump is gearing up for his ‘final battle’. So should we

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jul/24/donald-trump-2024-election-final-battle

Jack Smith Says Trump’s ‘Lies’ Fueled Attack On The Capito

Mike Pence Says Trump Indictment Shows ‘Our Country Is More Important Than One Man

Letters From An American

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/WhctKKZGZCNggmwdGrWlClzkjVxrtrsxtnXBwljFFtNQNrGfsWKbhRWFrmgQQggkZsWqctq

 Finally, 30 months after leaving office in disgrace, Trump must face the music                    

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/01/trump-republican-support-primaries

August 1 2024 A Legacy of Resistance: Anniversary of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising

      The First of August marks the Anniversary of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising, an object lesson of the horrors of war and the grandeur of Resistance against impossible odds. In a world where the Resistance now combats fascist tyranny in so many arenas and theatres, the Warsaw Uprising remains a song of the glories of antifascist action, revolutionary struggle, and liberation movements, and a cautionary tale of its dangers and points of failure.

     For sixty-three days, nearly a million civilians trapped in the city under Nazi occupation were savaged in this war of survival, a tragic and glorious Resistance doomed by the political implications of an independence movement which was timed to liberate Poland before the advancing Soviet forces with the goal of keeping Poland free rather than trading the Nazi Occupation for a Soviet one, which explains why it failed while the parallel Paris Uprising coordinated with the Allied Liberation succeeded. Had the leaders of the Warsaw Uprising forged an alliance and coordinated with the Soviet tanks on the far side of the river to break the Nazis, and negotiated who was in control of what later, results could have been very different.

     This is one of the great lessons of the Warsaw Uprising; always communicate before taking action. Another is the value of solidarity; who stands alone, dies alone. Most important of all is a lesson I would hope is obvious; win first, settle accounts and divide the spoils later.

     A campaign of disruption, ambush, and sabotage, using the confusion of political mass action as concealment and a unifying narrative, can make mischief behind enemy lines and in cities under occupation, and can be very useful in coordination with an army which can challenge an enemy directly, especially as scouts, but this is not the kind of war the Warsaw Uprising chose to fight. Much like Hamas in the Gaza War, they fought a campaign of total war for control of the city, with the city itself and the lives of all its people in the balance, with horrific consequences.

    Yet they fought, without regard to the cost, in a campaign both absurd and noble, tragic and glorious, a last stand against a nihilistic barbarian modernity of fascist tyranny and terror, doomed and beautiful as was the defense of the Great Siege of Malta, and bearing to the last the only title that matters, that of Invictus.

    Here I reference the great poem Invictus, which means Unconquered in Latin, by William Ernest Henley.

   “Out of the night that covers me,  

  Black as the Pit from pole to pole,  

I thank whatever gods may be  

  For my unconquerable soul.  

In the fell clutch of circumstance

  I have not winced nor cried aloud.  

Under the bludgeonings of chance  

  My head is bloody, but unbowed.  

Beyond this place of wrath and tears  

  Looms but the Horror of the shade,

And yet the menace of the years  

  Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.  

It matters not how strait the gate,  

  How charged with punishments the scroll,  

I am the master of my fate:

  I am the captain of my soul. “

    This was an international campaign waged by volunteers which, as reported by Transnational Resistance, included “several hundred and represented at least 15 countries – Slovakia, Hungary, Great Britain, Australia, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Italy, the United States of America, the Soviet Union, South Africa, Rumania and even Germany and Nigeria.”

    Today it finds echo and reflection in the International Brigades defending Ukraine both as forces integrated into her military and as independent volunteers like myself and my friends of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, and those operating within Russia as allies of the peace movement now pervasive throughout the Russian military and the civilian democracy mass movement, which include the many Polish patriots and Resistance fighters who rallied to the cause of liberty under threat of nuclear annihilation and imperial conquest by Russia in answer to the call for volunteers by myself and the few hundred Defenders of Mariupol who escaped with me as the city was being sealed off for destruction on April 18, a new Polish Resistance founded in the meeting of which I wrote in my post of April 20 2022, What is the Meaning of Mariupol? Address to the Volunteers in Warsaw on April 20 in Warsaw.

     The circumstances of Mariupol, Rafah, and Warsaw in 1944 are comparable; so also with the crimes against humanity of the enemy. Here was the re-enactment of Guernica which established the fascist doctrine of Total War.

      Himmler’s SS retaliated massively in the Wola Massacre, during which two hundred thousand civilians were murdered and Warsaw destroyed by explosives. His orders read; ”The non-fighting part of the population, women, children, shall also be killed. The whole city shall be razed to the ground”.      

     The entire story is told in Norman Davies’ book Rising ’44 The Battle for Warsaw. Admire them as heroes, our antifascist brothers and sisters. but also learn from their mistakes, and avoid allowing the innocent to bear the cost of your nobility of purpose.

     We fight for a humankind united as guarantors of each other’s universal rights and humanity, though we must do so in a world not yet of transcendent and glorious ideals but of ambiguous, ephemeral, and relative truths and values, wherein imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle leave us as few chances for stands on principle which do not threaten risks of ideological fracture as they do for debate and negotiation with those who would enslave us.

     Resistance is always war to the knife.

     As the iconic photo below is described in ExecutedToday; “One legacy was eerily and unknowingly captured by a LIFE magazine photographer in 1948, of a young girl in a school for disturbed children in Poland. Her face a scramble of innocence and madness as it peers into the lens, she illustrates her “home” as an incoherent chalk vortex. It wasn’t known until many years after this photo became emblematic of a generation wracked by horror, but “Tereska” — Teresa Adwentowska — was an orphaned survivor of Wola.”

http://www.executedtoday.com/images/Tereska.jpg

Rising ’44: The Battle for Warsaw, by Norman Davies

https://jacobinmag.com/2021/08/warsaw-uprising-poland-factions-right-nationalism-kaczynski-communists-jews-home-army/?fbclid=IwAR1o1ElzoTA5LG5cFXGyp8xTgwTqoyoYG263QkK8bSiWtoX6SL-qGImwdug

https://jacobinmag.com/2015/11/timothy-snyder-bialoszewski-memoir-warsaw-uprising

https://jacobinmag.com/2020/08/marek-edelman-poland-democracy-solidarnosc

Polish

7 sierpnia 2024 Dziedzictwo oporu: Rocznica Powstania Warszawskiego 1944

      Pierwszego sierpnia przypada rocznica Powstania Warszawskiego 1944, lekcja poglądowa o okropnościach wojny i wielkości ruchu oporu przeciwko niemożliwym przeciwnościom. W świecie, w którym Ruch Oporu walczy teraz z faszystowską tyranią na tak wielu arenach i teatrach, Powstanie Warszawskie pozostaje pieśnią o chwale antyfaszystowskiej akcji, walki rewolucyjnej i ruchów wyzwoleńczych oraz ostrzegawczą opowieścią o jego niebezpieczeństwach i punktach niepowodzenia.

     Przez sześćdziesiąt trzy dni prawie milion cywilów uwięzionych w mieście pod nazistowską okupacją było atakowanych w tej wojnie o przetrwanie, tragicznym i chwalebnym ruchu oporu skazanego na polityczne implikacje ruchu niepodległościowego, który miał wyzwolić Polskę przed nacierającymi siłami sowieckimi mając na celu utrzymanie Polski wolnej, a nie zamianę okupacji nazistowskiej na sowiecką, co wyjaśnia, dlaczego się nie powiodła, podczas gdy równoległe Powstanie Paryskie koordynowane z Wyzwoleniem Aliantów odniosło sukces. Gdyby przywódcy Powstania Warszawskiego zawarli sojusz i skoordynowali się z sowieckimi czołgami po drugiej stronie rzeki, aby rozbić nazistów i negocjować, kto będzie kontrolował, co później, wyniki mogłyby być zupełnie inne.

     To jedna z wielkich lekcji Powstania Warszawskiego; zawsze komunikuj się przed podjęciem działań. Inną jest wartość solidarności; kto stoi samotnie, umiera samotnie. Najważniejsza ze wszystkich jest lekcja, która, mam nadzieję, jest oczywista; najpierw wygrywaj, rozliczaj się, a później rozdzielaj łupy.

     Kampania zakłócania porządku, zasadzki i sabotażu, wykorzystująca zamieszanie politycznej akcji masowej jako ukrycie i jednoczącą narrację, może zrobić krzywdę za liniami wroga i w okupowanych miastach i może być bardzo przydatna w koordynacji z armią, która może rzucić wyzwanie wróg bezpośrednio, zwłaszcza jako harcerze, ale nie na taką wojnę zdecydowało się Powstanie Warszawskie. Toczyli kampanię totalnej wojny o kontrolę nad miastem, z samym miastem i życiem wszystkich jego mieszkańców w równowadze, z przerażającymi konsekwencjami.

    A jednak walczyli, bez względu na koszty, w kampanii zarówno absurdalnej, jak i szlachetnej, tragicznej i chwalebnej, o ostatni bastion przeciwko nihilistycznej barbarzyńskiej nowoczesności faszystowskiej tyranii i terroru, skazanej na zagładę i pięknej, jak obrona Wielkiego Oblężenia Malty, i nosząc do końca jedyny tytuł, który ma znaczenie, tytuł Invictus.

    Odwołuję się tu do wielkiego wiersza Invictus, co po łacinie oznacza Niezwyciężony, autorstwa Williama Ernesta Henleya.

„Z nocy, która mnie okrywa,

  Czarny jak dół od bieguna do bieguna,

Dziękuję jakimkolwiek bogom mogą być

  Za moją niepokonaną duszę.

W upadłym szponach okoliczności

  Nie skrzywiłem się ani nie płakałem na głos.

Pod ciosami przypadku

  Moja głowa jest zakrwawiona, ale nie pochylona.

Poza tym miejscem gniewu i łez

  Krosna, ale horror cienia,

A jednak groźba lat…

  Znajdzie i znajdzie mnie bez lęku.

Nie ma znaczenia, jak cienka brama,

  Jak obciążony karami zwój,

Jestem panem swojego losu:

  Jestem kapitanem mojej duszy. “

    Była to międzynarodowa kampania prowadzona przez wolontariuszy, która, jak donosi Transnational Resistance, obejmowała „kilkaset i reprezentowała co najmniej 15 krajów – Słowację, Węgry, Wielką Brytanię, Australię, Francję, Belgię, Holandię, Grecję, Włochy, Stany Zjednoczone Ameryki, Związku Radzieckiego, RPA, Rumunii, a nawet Niemiec i Nigerii”.

    Dziś odbija się to echem i odbiciem w międzynarodowych brygadach broniących Ukrainy zarówno jako siły zintegrowane z jej wojskiem, jak i jako niezależni ochotnicy, tacy jak ja i moi przyjaciele z Brygady Abrahama Lincolna, oraz jako sojusznicy ruchu pokojowego wszechobecnego w Rosji. masowy ruch wojskowy i cywilnej demokracji, w skład którego wchodzi wielu polskich patriotów i bojowników ruchu oporu, którzy zjednoczyli się na rzecz wolności pod groźbą nuklearnej zagłady i imperialnego podboju przez Rosję w odpowiedzi na apel o wolontariat przeze mnie i kilkuset Obrońców Mariupola który uciekł ze mną, gdy miasto było pieczętowane na zagładę 18 kwietnia, nowy polski ruch oporu założony na spotkaniu, o którym pisałem w poście z 20 kwietnia 2022 r. Jakie jest znaczenie Mariupola? Przemówienie do Wolontariuszy w Warszawie 20 kwietnia w Warszawie.

     Okoliczności Mariupola i Warszawy w 1944 r. są porównywalne; podobnie też ze zbrodniami przeciwko ludzkości wroga.

      SS Himmlera masowo zemściło się w masakrze na Woli, podczas której zamordowano dwieście tysięcy cywilów, a Warszawa zniszczono materiałami wybuchowymi. Jego rozkazy czytały; „Niewalcząca część ludności, kobiety, dzieci też ma zostać zabita. Całe miasto zostanie zrównane z ziemią”.

     Całą historię opowiada książka Normana Daviesa Rising ’44 The Battle for Warsaw. Podziwiaj ich jak bohaterów, naszych antyfaszystowskich braci i siostry. ale także ucz się na ich błędach i unikaj pozwalania niewinnym ponosić koszty twojej szlachetności celu.

     Walczymy o ludzkość zjednoczoną jako gwarancje swoich uniwersalnych praw i człowieczeństwa, chociaż musimy to robić w świecie jeszcze nie transcendentnych i chwalebnych ideałów, ale dwuznacznych, efemerycznych i względnych prawd i wartości, w którym narzucone warunki rewolucyjnej walki pozostawiają nam równie mało szans na stanowisko co do zasad, które nie grozi złamaniem ideologicznym, jak na debatę i negocjacje z tymi, którzy chcą nas zniewolić.

      Opór jest zawsze wojną na nóż.

     Jak opisano poniżej kultowe zdjęcie w ExecutedToday; „Jedna ze spuścizny została sfotografowana w dziwny i nieświadomy sposób przez fotografa magazynu LIFE w 1948 roku, przedstawiająca dziewczynkę ze szkoły dla niespokojnych dzieci w Polsce. Jej twarz to szał niewinności i szaleństwa, gdy spogląda w obiektyw, ilustruje swój „dom” jako niespójny kredowy wir. Nie było wiadomo, aż wiele lat po tym, jak to zdjęcie stało się symbolem pokolenia dręczonego horrorem, ale „Tereska” — Teresa Adwentowska — była osieroconą ocaloną z Woli”.

April 20 2022 What is the Meaning of Mariupol? Address to the Volunteers in Warsaw

   As we gather and prepare to take the fight to the enemy in direct action against the regime of Russia itself, against Vladimir Putin and his oligarchs and elites who sit at the helm of power and are now complicit in war crimes and crimes against humanity both in Ukraine and her province of Crimea in the imperial conquest of a sovereign and independent nation and in Russia in the subjugation of their own citizens, and in the other theatres of this the Third World War, Syria, Libya, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Nagorno-Karabakh, and in the capture of the American state in the Stolen Election of 2016 which put Putin’s treasonous and dishonorable agent and proxy Donald Trump, Our Clown of Terror, in the White House to oversee the infiltration and subversion of democracy by the Fourth Reich, we are confronted with countless horrific examples of the future that awaits us at the hands of Putin’s regime, and we have chosen Resistance as the only alternative to slavery and death.

    As we bring a Reckoning for tyranny, terror, and the horrors of war, in the crimes against humanity by Russia in Ukraine which include executions, torture, organized mass rape and the trafficking of abducted civilians, the capture of civilian hostages and use of forced labor, cannibalism using mobile factories, genocidal attacks, erasure of evidence of war crimes using mobile crematoriums which indicates official planning as part of the campaign of terror and proof that the countless crimes against humanity of this war are not aberrations but by design and at the orders of Putin and his commanders, threats of nuclear annihilation against European nations sending humanitarian aid, and the mass destruction of cities, we are become a court of last appeal in the defense of our universal human rights and of our humanity itself.

     The Russian strategy of conquest opens with sustained and relentless bombardment and destruction of hospitals, bomb shelters, stores of food, power systems, water supply, corridors of humanitarian aid and the evacuation of refugees; anything which could help citizens survive a siege. Once nothing is left standing, a campaign of terror as organized mass rape, torture, cannibalism, and looting begins, and any survivors enslaved or executed. This is a war of genocide and erasure, and to fascism there can be but one reply; Never Again!

    In this war which is now upon us, Putin’s goal is to restore the Russian Empire in the conquest of the Ukraine and the Black Sea as a launchpad for the conquest and dominion of the Mediterranean, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East; but he has a parallel and far more dangerous purpose in the abrogation of international law and our universal human rights. The true purpose of the Fourth Reich and its puppetmaster Vladimir Putin in this war is to make meaningless the idea of human rights.

    This is a war of tyranny and fascisms of blood, faith, and soil against democracy and a free society of equals, for the idea that we all of us have meaning and value which is uniquely ours and against enslavement and the theft of our souls.

     Within the limits of our form, of the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world, we struggle to achieve the human; ours is a revolution of Tikkun Olam, a Hebrew phrase meaning repair of the world which refers to our interdependence and duty of care for each other as equals who share a common humanity. 

     I’m sure all of us here know what Shlomo Bardin meant when he repurposed the phrase from the Kabbalah of Luria and the Midrash, but what do I mean by this?

     There are only two kinds of actions which we human beings are able to perform; those which affirm and exalt us, and those which degrade and dehumanize us.

     We live at a crossroads of history which may define the fate of our civilization and the future possibilities of becoming human, in the struggle between tyranny and liberty and between solidarity and division, and we must each of us choose who we wish to become, we humans; masters and slaves, or a free society of equals?

     As you know, my friends and I come to you from the Siege of Mariupol, a battle of flesh against unanswerable force and horror, of solidarity against division, of love against hate, and of hope against fear.

     Here, as in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising which we celebrated yesterday, the human will to freedom is tested by an enemy who exults in the embrace of the monstrous, whose policies and designs of war as terror gladly and with the open arrogance of power instrumentalize utter destruction and genocide, a war wherein atrocities and depravities are unleashed as tactics of shock and awe with intent of subjugation through learned helplessness and overwhelming and generalized fear.

    In Mariupol now as in Warsaw then, we affirm and renew our humanity in refusal to submit or to abandon our duty of care for each other. The Defenders of Mariupol who have sworn to die together and have refused many demands for surrender make their glorious Last Stand not as a gesture of defiance to a conqueror and tyrant, or to hold the port to slow and impede the Russian campaign in the Donbas now ongoing and prevent the seizure of the whole seaboard and control of the Black Sea, though these are pivotal to the liberation of Ukraine, but to protect the hundreds, possibly thousands, of refugees who now shelter in the tunnels of the underground fortress at the Azovstal and Ilyin Steel and Iron Works, especially the many children in makeshift hospitals who cannot be moved.

     This is the meaning of Mariupol; we stand together and remain human, regardless of the cost. This is what it means to be human, how it is achieved, and why solidarity is important. Among our values, our duty of care for others is paramount, because it is instrumental to everything else, and all else is contingent on this.

    To paraphrase America’s Pledge of Allegiance not as an oath to a nation but as the declaration of a United Humankind; We, the People of Earth, pledge ourselves to each other, as one humankind, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

    This brings us to my purpose in speaking to you today, for one of you has asked a question which is central to our mission of the Liberation of Russia and Ukraine, and to the solidarity of the international community in this our cause; how can ordinary people like ourselves hope for victory over the unanswerable force and overwhelming power of tyranny, terror, and war?

    There are two parallel and interdependent strategies of Resistance in asymmetrical warfare; the first and most important is to redefine the terms of victory. This is because we are mortal, and the limits of our form impose conditions of struggle; we must be like Jacob wrestling the angel, not to conquer this thing of immense power but to escape being conquered by it. We can be killed, imprisoned, tortured; but we cannot be defeated or conquered if we but refuse to submit.

     Power without legitimacy becomes meaningless, and authority crumbles when met with disbelief. This is why journalism and teaching as sacred callings in pursuit of truth are crucial to democracy, and why the Four Primary Duties of a Citizen are Question Authority, Expose Authority, Mock Authority, and Challenge Authority.

   What of the use of police in brutal repression by carceral states? The social use of force is hollow and brittle, and fails at the point of disobedience. When the police are an army of Occupation and the repression of dissent, they can be Resisted on those terms; my point here is simply that victory against unanswerable force consists of refusal to submit.

     Who refuses to submit and cannot be compelled becomes Unconquered and is free. This is a kind of victory which cannot be taken from us.

    Second is our strategy for survival against an enemy who does not regard us as human, and will use terror to enforce submission through learned helplessness. By any means necessary, as this principle is expressed in the famous dictum of Sartre in his 1948 play Dirty Hands, quoted by Frantz Fanon in his 1960 speech Why We Use Violence, and made immortal by Malcolm X.

      In Mariupol I began referring to this in its oldest form, war to the knife. Its meaning for us is simple; those who would enslave us and who abandon all laws and all limits may hide behind none.

     The question to which I speak today in reply intrigued me, because it was nearly identical to a line which sets up one of the greatest fictional military speeches in literature, Miles Vorkosigan’s speech to the Maurilacans in The Borders of Infinity by Lois McMaster Bujold.

     In this story, Miles has just led a mass prisoner of war escape, from a prison which like all fascist tyrannies is fiendishly designed to produce abjection, as described by Julia Kristeva in her famous essay, in circumstances of horror such as those which my friends here and I have just survived, and in which we now find ourselves like the Marilacans having achieved an army, and about to take the fight to the enemy on his own ground. 

     One of the volunteers says, ”The defenders of Mariupol had those crazy Cossack warriors, swearing an oath to die rather than surrender, professional mercenaries from everywhere, all of them elite forces and utterly fearless. We just can’t fight on those terms; its been seventy years since we fought a total war of survival, and most of us here are professionals and university intellectuals. Poland is civilized, maybe too civilized for what’s coming our way.”

     To this I answer with Miles; “Let me tell you about the defenders of Mariupol. Those who sought a glorious death in battle found it early on. This cleared the chain of command of accumulated fools.

    The survivors were those who learned to fight dirty, and live, and fight another day, and win and win and win. And for whom nothing, not comfort nor security, not family nor friends nor their immortal souls, was more important than victory.

     They were not supermen or more than human. They sweated in confusion and darkness.

     And with not one half the resources Poland possesses, Ukraine remains unconquered. When you’re all that stands between liberty and tyranny, freedom and slavery, life and death, between a people and genocide, when you’re human, there is no mustering out.”

    To this wonderful speech of a fictional hero who simply refuses to stay down to the fictional survivors of the very real horror of being held captive and powerless by a tyrant, whether as prisoners of war or citizens of an occupied city, I must add this; how if Poland and Ukraine stand together, with all of Europe and America united in Resistance?

    And if you are telling me you could not today fight a Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, this I do not believe. Nor would you do so alone, for during this Passover as the Jewish community remembers the story of the Exile, the world also remembers; we watch it in our news every day, enacted once again in Ukraine. This, too, is a Haggadah, in which all of humankind can share, and which yet again teaches us the necessity of our interdependence and solidarity.  

     As written by Alan Moore in V For Vendetta; “Since mankind’s dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We’ve seen where their way leads, through camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse.”  

     Here is a truth to which all of us here today can bear witness.

     But there is a thing which tyrants never learn; the use of force and violence obeys the Third Law of Motion, and creates resistance as its own counterforce. And when the brutality and crimes against humanity of that force and violence are performed upon the stage of the world, visible to all and a history which cannot be erased, part of the story of every human being from now until the end of our species, which no washing of hands may deny as demonstrated  by Shakespeare’s Lady MacBeth, repression finds answer in reckoning as we awaken to our interdependence and the necessity of our solidarity and duty of care for each other.

     And so I offer to all of you the Oath of the Resistance as it was given to me by the great Jean Genet on that fateful day in 1982, in a burning house, in a lost cause, after we refused to surrender; “We swear our loyalty to each other, to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.”

    An unusual fellow, but behind the concealment of his literary notoriety he remained the Legionnaire he had once been, and after spying on the Nazis in Berlin in 1939 had returned to Paris to make mischief for her unwelcome guests, and there in 1940 repurposed the oath of the Foreign Legion for what allies he could gather. He said it was the finest thing he ever stole.

     My hope is that I have lived and written at the beginning of the story of humankind, and not at its end.

     What is the meaning of Mariupol?

      Here we may look to its precedents as Last Stands, battles, and sieges; Thermopylae, Malta, Washington crossing the Delaware and the Battle of Trenton, Gallipoli, Stalingrad, and its direct parallel the Siege of Sarajevo. Moments of decision wherein the civilization of humankind hung in the balance, and with it our future possibilities of becoming human.

     Who do we want to become, we humans; slaves and tyrants or a free society of equals? And how much of our humanity are we willing to trade for the chance of such futures?

     What of ourselves can we not afford to lose, without also losing who we are? How much of our humanity can we claw back from the darkness in refusal to submit to those who would enslave us, and in solidarity with each other?

     We must each of us face our own Gate of Fire, as did the Spartans at Thermopylae, and choose.

    What are we worth, if we permit ruthless bandit kings to commit atrocities, plunder, and enslave others?

     What is western civilization worth, if we will not live up to our fine words?   And fine words they remain, such as these written by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence in 1776, a synthesis and revisioning of ideas from Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Rousseau; “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

     What is America, if not a guarantor of democracy and our universal human rights, and a beacon of hope to the world?

    Let us reply with the words written by J.R.R. Tolkien between 1937 and 1955 in his luminous reimagination of the Second World War and the conflict of dominion which immediately followed it between tyranny and democracy, first against fascism and then between the allies who defeated it as spheres of dominion and systems of economic and political organization but both for different dreams of a free society of equals, in the iconic speech of Aragorn at the Black Gate in The Return of the King which unites ethos, logos, pathos, and kairos; “A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day. An hour of wolves and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down, but it is not this day. This day we fight.”

     Join us.  

This Day We Fight: Aragorn’s Speech at the Black Gate

Borders of Infinity, by Lois McMaster Bujold

Frank Gardner on the Significance of Mariupol in this war

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60825226

Hebrew

20 באפריל 2022 מה המשמעות של מריופול? כתובת למתנדבים בוורשה

   בעודנו מתאספים ומתכוננים לקחת את המאבק אל האויב בפעולה ישירה נגד משטר רוסיה עצמה, נגד ולדימיר פוטין והאוליגרכים והאליטות שלו היושבים בראש השלטון וכעת שותפים לפשעי מלחמה ופשעים נגד האנושות אוקראינה ומחוז קרים שלה בכיבוש האימפריאלי של אומה ריבונית ועצמאית וברוסיה בהכנעת אזרחיהם, ובשאר התיאטראות של זה מלחמת העולם השלישית, סוריה, לוב, בלארוס, קזחסטן, נגורנו קרבאך , ובתפיסה של המדינה האמריקנית בבחירות הגנובות של 2016, שהכניסה את סוכנו ובוגדתו של פוטין וחסר הכבוד דונלד טראמפ, ליצן הטרור שלנו, בבית הלבן כדי לפקח על חדירתה וחתרנות הדמוקרטיה על ידי הרייך הרביעי, אנו מתמודדים עם אינספור דוגמאות מחרידות לעתיד המצפה לנו בידי משטרו של פוטין, ובחרנו בהתנגדות כאלטרנטיבה היחידה לעבדות ומוות.

    כאשר אנו מביאים חשבון לעריצות, טרור וזוועות המלחמה, בפשעים נגד האנושות על ידי רוסיה באוקראינה הכוללים הוצאות להורג, עינויים, אונס המוני מאורגן וסחר באזרחים חטופים, לכידת בני ערובה אזרחיים ושימוש בכפייה עבודה, קניבליזם באמצעות מפעלים ניידים, התקפות רצח עם, מחיקת עדויות לפשעי מלחמה באמצעות משרפות ניידות המעידות על תכנון רשמי כחלק ממסע הטרור והוכחה לכך שאינספור הפשעים נגד האנושות של מלחמה זו אינם סטיות אלא בתכנון ובתכנון. פקודות של פוטין ומפקדיו, איומים בהשמדה גרעינית נגד מדינות אירופה ששולחות סיוע הומניטרי, והשמדה המונית של ערים, הפכנו לבית משפט של ערעור אחרון בהגנה על זכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו ועל האנושות שלנו עצמה.

     אסטרטגיית הכיבוש הרוסית נפתחת בהפצצה מתמשכת ובלתי פוסקת ובהרס של בתי חולים, מקלטים, מאגרי מזון, מערכות חשמל, אספקת מים, מסדרונות של סיוע הומניטרי ופינוי פליטים; כל דבר שיכול לעזור לאזרחים לשרוד מצור. ברגע ששום דבר לא נשאר עומד, מתחיל מסע טרור כמו אונס המוני מאורגן, עינויים, קניבליזם וביזה, וכל ניצול משועבד או מוצא להורג. זוהי מלחמה של רצח עם ומחיקה, ולפשיזם יכולה להיות רק תשובה אחת; לעולם לא שוב!

במלחמה זו אשר כעת עלינו, מטרתו של פוטין היא להחזיר את האימפריה הרוסית בכיבוש אוקראינה והים השחור כנקודת שיגור לכיבוש ושליטה של הים התיכון, אירופה, אפריקה והמזרח התיכון; אבל יש לו מטרה מקבילה ומסוכנת הרבה יותר בביטול החוק הבינלאומי וזכויות האדם האוניברסליות שלנו. המטרה האמיתית של הרייך הרביעי ומנהל הבובות שלו ולדימיר פוטין במלחמה זו היא להפוך את רעיון זכויות האדם לחסר משמעות.

    זוהי מלחמת עריצות ופשיזם של דם, אמונה ואדמה נגד הדמוקרטיה וחברה חופשית של שווים, על הרעיון שלכולנו יש משמעות וערך שהם ייחודיים שלנו ונגד שיעבוד וגניבת נפשנו.

     בתוך גבולות הצורה שלנו, של פגמי אנושיותנו ושבירת העולם, אנו נאבקים להשיג את האדם; שלנו היא מהפכה של תיקון עולם, ביטוי עברי שמשמעותו תיקון העולם, המתייחס לתלות ההדדית ולחובת הזהירות שלנו זה לזה כשווים החולקים אנושיות משותפת.

     אני בטוח שכולנו כאן יודעים למה התכוון שלמה ברדין כשחיזר את הביטוי מקובלת לוריא ומהמדרש, אבל למה אני מתכוון בזה?

     ישנם רק שני סוגים של פעולות שאנו בני האדם מסוגלים לבצע; אלה שמאשרים ומעלים אותנו, ואלה שמבזים ומבטלים אותנו.

     אנו חיים בצומת של היסטוריה שעשוי להגדיר את גורל הציוויליזציה שלנו ואת האפשרויות העתידיות להיות אנושיות, במאבק בין עריצות לחירות ובין סולידריות לפילוג, ועלינו כל אחד מאיתנו לבחור למי ברצוננו להיות, אנו בני אנוש; אדונים ועבדים, או חברה חופשית של שווים?

     כפי שאתם יודעים, חברי ואני באים אליכם מהמצור על מריופול, קרב של בשר נגד כוח ואימה שאין להם מענה, של סולידריות נגד פילוג, של אהבה נגד שנאה ושל תקווה נגד פחד.

     כאן, כמו במרד גטו ורשה שחגגנו אתמול, נבחן הרצון האנושי לחירות על ידי אויב המתמוגג בחיקם של המפלצתיים, שמדיניותו ותכנוני המלחמה שלו כטרור בשמחה וביהירות הגלויה של הכוח מכשירים באופן מוחלט. הרס ורצח עם, מלחמה שבה זוועות וקללות משתחררים כטקטיקות של הלם ויראה מתוך כוונה להכניע באמצעות חוסר אונים נלמד ופחד מוחץ ומוכלל.

Polish

20 kwietnia 2022 Co oznacza Mariupol? Adres do Wolontariuszy w Warszawie

   Gdy zbieramy się i przygotowujemy do podjęcia walki z wrogiem w bezpośredniej akcji przeciwko reżimowi samej Rosji, przeciwko Władimirowi Putinowi oraz jego oligarchom i elitom, które zasiadają u steru władzy i są teraz współwinne zbrodni wojennych i zbrodni przeciwko ludzkości zarówno w Ukraina i jej prowincja Krym w imperialnym podboju suwerennego i niepodległego narodu, a w Rosji w ujarzmieniu własnych obywateli, a w innych teatrach tej III wojny światowej, Syrii, Libii, Białorusi, Kazachstanie, Górskim Karabachu , a także w zdobyciu państwa amerykańskiego w skradzionych wyborach 2016, które umieściły zdradzieckiego i niehonorowego agenta Putina i pełnomocnika Donalda Trumpa, naszego klauna terroru, w Białym Domu, aby nadzorować infiltrację i niszczenie demokracji przez Czwartą Rzeszę, my mamy do czynienia z niezliczonymi przerażającymi przykładami przyszłości, która czeka nas z rąk reżimu Putina, a my wybraliśmy Ruch Oporu jako jedyną alternatywę dla niewolnictwa i śmierci.

    Kiedy wprowadzamy rozliczenie za tyranię, terror i okropności wojny, w zbrodniach przeciwko ludzkości dokonanych przez Rosję na Ukrainie, które obejmują egzekucje, tortury, zorganizowane masowe gwałty i handel uprowadzonymi cywilami, schwytanie cywilnych zakładników i użycie sił pracy, kanibalizm z wykorzystaniem mobilnych fabryk, ludobójcze ataki, wymazywanie dowodów zbrodni wojennych z wykorzystaniem mobilnych krematoriów, co wskazuje na oficjalne planowanie w ramach kampanii terroru i dowód, że niezliczone zbrodnie przeciwko ludzkości w tej wojnie nie są aberracją, ale celowo i na rozkazy Putina i jego dowódców, groźby nuklearnej zagłady narodów europejskich wysyłających pomoc humanitarną oraz masowe niszczenie miast, stajemy się ostatnim sądem apelacyjnym w obronie naszych uniwersalnych praw człowieka i samego naszego człowieczeństwa.

     Rosyjska strategia podboju rozpoczyna się ciągłym i bezlitosnym bombardowaniem i niszczeniem szpitali, schronów bombowych, magazynów żywności, systemów zasilania, zaopatrzenia w wodę, korytarzy pomocy humanitarnej i ewakuacji uchodźców; wszystko, co mogłoby pomóc obywatelom przetrwać oblężenie. Gdy nic nie zostanie ocalone, rozpoczyna się kampania terroru, polegająca na zorganizowanych masowych gwałtach, torturach, kanibalizmie i grabieży, a wszyscy, którzy przeżyli, zostają zniewoleni lub straceni. To jest wojna ludobójstwa i wymazywania, a na faszyzm może być tylko jedna odpowiedź; Nigdy więcej!

    W tej wojnie, która teraz nad nami, celem Putina jest przywrócenie Imperium Rosyjskiego w podboju Ukrainy i Morza Czarnego jako platformy startowej do podboju i panowania nad Morzem Śródziemnym, Europą, Afryką i Bliskim Wschodem; ale ma on równoległy i znacznie bardziej niebezpieczny cel, polegający na uchyleniu prawa międzynarodowego i naszych uniwersalnych praw człowieka. Prawdziwym celem Czwartej Rzeszy i jej marionetkowego mistrza Władimira Putina w tej wojnie jest uczynienie bezsensownej idei praw człowieka.

    To jest wojna tyranii i faszyzmów krwi, wiary i ziemi przeciwko demokracji i wolnemu społeczeństwu równych, o ideę, że my wszyscy mamy sens i wartość, która jest wyłącznie nasza i przeciwko zniewoleniu i kradzieży naszych dusz.

     W granicach naszej formy, wad naszego człowieczeństwa i zepsucia świata, walczymy o osiągnięcie człowieczeństwa; nasza jest rewolucją Tikkun Olam, hebrajskiego wyrażenia oznaczającego naprawę świata, które odnosi się do naszej współzależności i obowiązku troski o siebie nawzajem jako równych, którzy mają wspólne człowieczeństwo.

     Jestem pewien, że każdy z nas tutaj wie, co miał na myśli Shlomo Bardin, gdy zmienił frazę z Kabały Lurii i Midraszu, ale co mam przez to na myśli?

     Są tylko dwa rodzaje działań, które my, ludzie, jesteśmy w stanie wykonać; te, które nas utwierdzają i wywyższają, oraz te, które nas poniżają i odczłowieczają.

     Żyjemy na skrzyżowaniu historii, które mogą określić los naszej cywilizacji i przyszłe możliwości stania się człowiekiem, w walce między tyranią a wolnością oraz między solidarnością a podziałem, i każdy z nas musi wybrać, kim chce się stać, ludzie; panowie i niewolnicy czy wolne społeczeństwo równych?

Ukrainian

    20 квітня 2022 Що означає Маріуполь? Звернення до волонтерів у Варшаві

   Збираючись і готуючись до боротьби з ворогом у прямих діях проти режиму самої Росії, проти Володимира Путіна та його олігархів та еліт, які сидять біля керма влади і зараз є причетними до військових злочинів і злочинів проти людства як у Україна та її провінція Крим в імперському завоювання суверенної і незалежної нації і в Росії в підкоренні власних громадян, а на інших театрах цієї Третьої світової війни, Сирії, Лівії, Білорусі, Казахстану, Нагірного Карабаху , а також під час захоплення американської держави на викрадених виборах 2016 року, коли зрадницького й безчесного агента Путіна та довіреної особи Дональда Трампа, нашого клоуна терору, у Білий дім для нагляду за проникненням і підривом демократії Четвертим рейхом, ми ми стикаємося з незліченною кількістю жахливих прикладів майбутнього, яке чекає на нас від рук режиму Путіна, і ми обрали Опір як єдину альтернативу рабству і смерті.

    Оскільки ми приносимо розплату за тиранію, терор і жахи війни, за злочини проти людства, зроблені Росією в Україні, які включають страти, катування, організовані масові зґвалтування та торгівлю викраденими цивільними особами, захоплення цивільних заручників та використання примусових праця, канібалізм з використанням пересувних фабрик, напади геноциду, знищення доказів військових злочинів за допомогою мобільних крематоріїв, що вказує на офіційне планування як частину кампанії терору та доказ того, що незліченна кількість злочинів проти людства цієї війни не є відхиленнями, а задумом і накази Путіна та його командирів, загрози ядерного знищення європейських країн, які надсилають гуманітарну допомогу, і масове знищення міст, ми стаємо останньою апеляційною інстанцією у захисті наших універсальних прав людини та нашого людства.

     Російська завойовницька стратегія починається з постійних і невпинних бомбардувань і руйнувань лікарень, бомбосховищ, складів продовольства, енергосистем, водопостачання, коридорів гуманітарної допомоги та евакуації біженців; все, що могло б допомогти громадянам пережити облогу. Після того, як нічого не залишиться, починається кампанія терору як організовані масові зґвалтування, тортури, канібалізм та мародерство, а будь-які вижили поневолені або страчені. Це війна на геноцид і стирання, і на фашизм може бути лише одна відповідь; Ніколи знову!

У цій війні, яка зараз на нас, мета Путіна — відновити Російську імперію у завоювання України та Чорного моря як стартовий майданчик для завоювання та панування Середземномор’я, Європи, Африки та Близького Сходу; але він має паралельну й набагато більш небезпечну мету — скасування міжнародного права та наших універсальних прав людини. Справжня мета Четвертого рейху та його маріонетка Володимира Путіна у цій війні – позбутися сенсу ідеї прав людини.

    Це війна тиранії та фашизму крові, віри та ґрунту проти демократії та вільного суспільства рівних за ідею, що всі ми маємо сенс і цінність, яка є унікальною, а також проти поневолення та крадіжки наших душ.

     У межах нашої форми, вад нашої людяності та зламаності світу ми боремося за досягнення людського; наша – це революція Тіккуна Олама, єврейської фрази, що означає відновлення світу, яка стосується нашої взаємозалежності та обов’язку піклуватися один про одного як рівних, хто об’єднує спільне людство.

     Я впевнений, що всі ми тут знаємо, що мав на увазі Шломо Бардін, коли переробив фразу з Каббали Лурія і Мідраш, але що я маю на увазі під цим?

     Є лише два види дій, які ми, люди, здатні виконувати; ті, що стверджують і підносять нас, і ті, що принижують і дегуманізують нас.

     Ми живемо на перехресті історії, яка може визначити долю нашої цивілізації та майбутні можливості стати людиною, у боротьбі між тиранією та свободою, між солідарністю та поділом, і кожен із нас має вибрати, ким хоче стати, ми люди; панів і рабів, чи вільне суспільство рівних?

Russian

20 апреля 2022 Что такое Мариуполь? Обращение к волонтерам в Варшаве

   Пока мы собираемся и готовимся принять бой с врагом в прямом действии против самого режима России, против Владимира Путина и его олигархов и элит, которые сидят у руля власти и ныне причастны к военным преступлениям и преступлениям против человечности как в Украина и ее провинция Крым в имперском завоевании суверенной и независимой нации и в России в подчинении собственных граждан, и на других театрах этой Третьей мировой войны, Сирия, Ливия, Беларусь, Казахстан, Нагорный Карабах , а также в захвате американского государства на украденных выборах 2016 года, когда изменнический и бесчестный агент и доверенное лицо Путина Дональд Трамп, наш клоун террора, попал в Белый дом, чтобы наблюдать за проникновением и подрывом демократии Четвертым рейхом, мы столкнулись с бесчисленными ужасными примерами будущего, которое ожидает нас от рук путинского режима, и мы выбрали Сопротивление как единственную альтернативу рабству и смерти.

    Поскольку мы приносим расплату за тиранию, террор и ужасы войны, за преступления против человечности, совершенные Россией на Украине, включая казни, пытки, организованные массовые изнасилования и торговлю похищенными гражданскими лицами, захват гражданских заложников и применение насильственных труд, каннибализм с использованием передвижных заводов, акты геноцида, стирание доказательств военных преступлений с использованием передвижных крематориев, что указывает на официальное планирование как часть кампании террора и доказательство того, что бесчисленные преступления против человечности в ходе этой войны не являются отклонением от нормы, а являются преднамеренными и преднамеренными приказы Путина и его командиров, угрозы ядерного уничтожения европейским странам, отправляющим гуманитарную помощь, и массовое разрушение городов, мы становимся судом последней инстанции в защиту наших универсальных прав человека и самой нашей человечности.

     Российская стратегия завоевания начинается с непрерывных и безжалостных бомбардировок и разрушений больниц, бомбоубежищ, складов продовольствия, энергосистем, водоснабжения, коридоров гуманитарной помощи и эвакуации беженцев; все, что может помочь гражданам пережить осаду. Как только ничего не остается, начинается кампания террора с организованными массовыми изнасилованиями, пытками, каннибализмом и грабежами, а все выжившие порабощаются или казнятся. Это война геноцида и стирания, и фашизму может быть только один ответ; Больше никогда!

    В этой войне, которая сейчас надвигается, цель Путина состоит в том, чтобы восстановить Российскую империю путем завоевания Украины и Черного моря в качестве стартовой площадки для завоевания и господства в Средиземноморье, Европе, Африке и на Ближнем Востоке; но у него есть параллельная и гораздо более опасная цель в отмене международного права и наших универсальных прав человека. Истинная цель Четвертого рейха и его кукловода Владимира Путина в этой войне состоит в том, чтобы лишить смысла идею прав человека.

    Это война тирании и фашизма крови, веры и почвы против демократии и свободного общества равных, за идею о том, что у всех нас есть смысл и ценность, которые принадлежат только нам, и против порабощения и кражи наших душ.

     В пределах нашей формы, недостатков нашей человечности и разбитости мира мы боремся за достижение человеческого; наша — это революция Тиккун Олам, фразы на иврите, означающей восстановление мира, которая указывает на нашу взаимозависимость и обязанность заботиться друг о друге как о равных, разделяющих общую человечность.

     Я уверен, что все мы здесь знаем, что имел в виду Шломо Бардин, когда он переделал фразу из Каббалы Лурии и Мидраша, но что я имею в виду под этим?

     Есть только два вида действий, которые мы, человеческие существа, можем совершать; те, которые утверждают и возвышают нас, и те, которые унижают и дегуманизируют нас.

     Мы живем на перекрестке истории, который может определить судьбу нашей цивилизации и будущие возможности стать людьми, в борьбе между тиранией и свободой, между солидарностью и разделением, и каждый из нас должен выбрать, кем мы хотим стать, мы люди; господа и рабы или свободное общество равных?

July 31 2024 Israel and Iran At the Edge of the Abyss; Will the World Jump With Them?

   Seventy three civilians were injured and two children killed by Israel in Beirut, the price of the life of one political figure of Hamas, in circumstances which reveal the true motives of the state of Israel in the whole Gaza War.  

   I find it interesting that Israel has assassinated the leader of the Peace With Israel faction within Hamas and arguably of the peace and reconciliation with Israel movement within all of Palestine, a crime designed to derail the ceasefire and prisoner release negotiations and to maintain Hamas as an enemy and bogeyman with which to legitimize the authority of the Netanyahu regime. 

     Such enemies are very useful to tyrants and authoritarian regimes of force and control in the centralization of power and manufacture of legitimacy; states must create enemies where they do no already exist, and act to keep them on opposite sides of the board from their own citizens. Black Saturday was a textbook example of such legitimation operations, in which the Netanyahu regime conspired with its partner the nationalist faction of Hamas in the horrors of October Seven. 

     It also places the new leader of Iran’s rapprochement with America and a possible return to nuclear de escalation in check, and this disturbs me even more, for Netanyahu has destabilized the world order and moved us closer to war because he is losing his American sponsorship and the possibility of a second Trump presidency which offers diplomatic immunity for his Palestinian Genocide and imperial conquest of the whole Middle East.

      Israel and Iran now stand hand in hand at the edge of an Abyss, and the great question of our future is just this; will the world jump with them?

     As written by Simon Tisdall in The Guardian, in an article entitled Israel has all but declared war in the Middle East – a conflict it cannot hope to win; “Failure to halt the war in Gaza lies at the heart of the latest lethal savagery in the Middle East. The assassination in Tehran of Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, will be celebrated in Israel as just revenge for the 7 October atrocities. But Islamist hardliners in Iran and militant groups across the Arab world will see it as further proof of their belief that the state of Israel is a menace that must be destroyed at all costs.

     And so the hatred, the violence and the misery will continue unchecked, and will in all probability worsen and spread. Just because this homicidal cycle is familiar does not mean it cannot accelerate. Few parts of the Middle East – Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan – have escaped the toxic fallout of the Gaza conflict. In Washington DC and Britain, domestic politics are roiled by the fury and the grief. The UN’s impotence is daily, humiliatingly exposed. No one is immune to this poison.

     It would have been preferable if Haniyeh, in common with Hamas leaders based in Gaza, had faced trial at the international criminal court (ICC) – and been made to answer for his crimes. That now cannot happen. Instead, Israel has once again sought “justice” through extrajudicial murder. Only in April, a covert Israeli strike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus killed a top Iran Revolutionary Guards Corps general – and brought the region to the brink of all-out war. There have been numerous similar killings.

     The man overseeing these assassinations, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister and chief architect of the continuing genocidal campaign against Palestinian civilians in Gaza, should be forced to answer for his crimes, too. The ICC’s chief prosecutor is trying to ensure that happens, despite US opposition. But there is little sign it will. More likely, given the example he sets, is that Netanyahu will himself be targeted by assassins.

     Tuesday’s almost simultaneous, reported killing of a senior Hezbollah commander, Fuad Shukur, in an Israeli airstrike in south Beirut, will help ensure the Middle East’s downward spiral into destruction continues to accelerate. Once again, the Israel-Hamas war is the driving factor. The attack was in retaliation for an alleged Hezbollah missile strike in the occupied Golan Heights last weekend that killed 12 young people.

     Yet the main reason Hezbollah is firing missiles into Israeli-held territory now is Gaza. The organisation’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has been relatively restrained since 7 October, given the huge military resources at his disposal. Nasrallah says cross-border attacks will stop when there is a ceasefire in Gaza. Killing Haniyeh, a senior Hamas decision-maker and negotiator, makes such a ceasefire even less likely, at least in the short term. Killing Shukur is another dangerous provocation.

     It is also worth pointing out, amid the frequently overwhelming welter of daily horrors, that two children were killed and 74 people injured in the Beirut airstrike, according to Lebanese officials. But then again, Israeli forces have been killing Gaza’s children with impunity for months. The UN puts the total at 15,000 dead. Two more deaths barely register (except with parents and families).

     It’s not that Israel is blind to the broader consequences of its role in this endless, vicious cycle. But it says that everyone else is to blame. “Hezbollah’s ongoing aggression and brutal attacks are dragging the people of Lebanon and the entire Middle East into a wider escalation,” a military spokesperson said. “While we prefer to resolve hostilities without a wider war, the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] is fully prepared for any scenario.”

     The wider war Israel “prefers” to avoid is, in fact, already raging. Israel repeatedly bombed Yemen’s Red Sea port of Hodeidah this month after a drone attack on Tel Aviv by Tehran-backed Houthi Shia militants. Netanyahu, whose answer to almost every problem is extreme violence, boasted the bombing “makes it clear to our enemies that there is no place that the long arm of the state of Israel will not reach”. That sounded very much like a declaration of war on the entire region. Yet it’s a war Israel cannot ultimately win.

     Once again, the Houthis say the principal reason they are attacking Israel, and shipping in the Red Sea – attacks that have sucked the US and Britain into risky military action – is Gaza. If there’s a ceasefire, they claim, their attacks will halt. This is hardly radical. This is the same Gaza notional ceasefire backed, in theory, by the US, Britain, the EU and the UN security council. This is the same ceasefire millions of people in the Arab world, Europe and the US have been demanding for months. This is the same ceasefire that still – still – doesn’t happen.

     Will a humiliated Iran hit back directly over the Haniyeh killing? Will Hezbollah escalate? Will a divided Israel, its reputation further disfigured by the torture and alleged sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees, plunge deeper towards national disintegration as far-right zealots, backed by Netanyahu’s ministers, storm army bases to free the alleged abusers? Quite possibly. No outcome is off the table in a region where the so-called rules of the game that hitherto prevented an all-consuming conflagration are being burned page by bloody page.

     People say the Middle East is complicated. It is. They say there are no answers. This may be true. But despite the rockets, Gaza is not rocket science. It’s not that complicated. Stop the war. Stop the killing. Save the children. Agree a ceasefire and free the hostages. And then all the other problems, while not going away, may become just a little easier to manage.”

     As written in The Guardian by Bethan McKernan, in an article entitled Ismail Haniyeh’s death brings prospect of regional war closer; “Like all prominent Hamas figures, Ismail Haniyeh lived under the constant threat of assassination; his death in the Iranian capital of Tehran in a reported missile strike appears to be the latest daring Israeli operation targeting its enemies around the world.

    In the aftermath of the Palestinian militant group’s brutal 7 October attack, Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said Hamas’s leadership, including those outside the Gaza Strip, were “marked for death”.

     The timing and location of Haniyeh’s killing, however, means it could be yet another destabilising factor in a conflict already on the verge of escalating into a regional war. Missteps in this choreography of airstrikes and targeted killings are an ever-present possibility, and the stakes keep getting higher.

     Assassinating the head of Hamas’s political bureau is ostensibly a major morale boost for Israel, a boon for the unpopular Netanyahu, and a heavy blow to the Palestinian group.

     After almost 10 months of fighting in Gaza, Israel had until now failed to take out Hamas’s top leaders: the mastermind of 7 October, Yahya Sinwar, is still at large in Gaza. It is also unclear whether a massive airstrike earlier this month targeting the group’s military commander, Mohammed Deif, was successful.

     The Hamas official Moussa Abu Marzouk confirmed that Haniyeh had died during a visit to Tehran for the inauguration of the new Iranian president. Marzouk called the killing a “grave escalation” that “will not go unpunished”, although the Islamist movement’s capacity to respond is severely diminished after almost a year of war against Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip.

     A response could instead come from Hamas’s allies, bringing the Middle East closer to a regional war between Israel and Iran and its proxies. Haniyeh’s death came just hours after Israel claimed it killed a top Hezbollah commander in the Lebanese capital, Beirut, and the region is already bracing for the powerful Shia militia’s reaction.

     Israel and Hezbollah have been fighting a war of attrition on the blue line that separates Lebanon and the Jewish state since Hezbollah joined the fighting on 8 October, and tensions have soared since an airstrike on Saturday that killed 12 children in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights. Hezbollah has denied it was responsible for the attack.

     Unable to protect one of its most important allies on its own soil, Iran needs to save face. A spokesperson for Iran’s supreme national security council said early on Wednesday that the perpetrators of the Tehran attack would receive “a response”, according to Lebanese network Al-Mayadeen.

     Iranian state television also said the assassination would prompt “retaliation” from the Shia axis of militias around the Middle East backed by Iran. Several of these proxies, including Yemen’s Houthis, have already fired missiles and drones at Israel and US assets in the region over the last nine months, ostensibly to aid Hamas’s war effort.

     The people of Gaza and Israeli hostages held in Hamas’s tunnels are the immediate victims here because a breakthrough in the protracted ceasefire talks is now even less likely.

     As the head of the group’s politburo, based in the Qatari capital of Doha, Haniyeh was a key figure in talks mediated by Egypt, Qatar and the US aimed at a lasting ceasefire and hostage and prisoner release deal. Iranian state television said that Haniyeh’s death would delay the negotiations by “several months”.

     While Hamas is used to having to replace and promote new leaders in the wake of Israeli assassinations, the loss of a globally famous figure such as Haniyeh will have a major operational impact. The 62-year-old Hamas veteran managed the movement’s relationships with allies in Tehran and around the region, including Hezbollah.

     The politburo leader was also widely considered to be more pragmatic and open to negotiation with Israel than hardliners such as Sinwar, the group’s leader in Gaza.

     Haniyeh was an early advocate inside Hamas for political and diplomatic efforts alongside armed resistance, and adopted his predecessor’s revised 2017 charter, which implicitly accepted the existence of Israel.

     The 7 October assault was carried out partly in response to hardening attitudes towards the Palestinians in Israel as the country shifted to the right politically. It has led inevitably to intense scrutiny of Hamas’s apparent previous willingness to pursue a diplomatic solution to the conflict.

     How much Haniyeh knew about the attack beforehand is not clear, although he was quick to champion it. His removal is unlikely to prompt the group to move towards a more propitiatory position.”

      All of this plays out as consequences and causes in recursion of moral harm, savaging and brutalization, degradation and dehumanization of the citizens of Israel by the state and the imperialist and fascist tyranny of the aberrant and despicable Netanyahu settler regime as a strategy of subjugation of those in whose name they claim to act. This is a primary strategy of fascism; the state commits unforgiveable crimes against humanity claiming to act in defense of their citizens to make them complicit and irreversibly bind them to the authority of the leader.

     Biden attempted to do the same to us in making America complicit in genocide and other Israeli crimes and depravities by sending them the weapons and money to do so; this is true reason the power brokers of the Democratic Party and the big donors who make its operations possible turned on him and purged him from the election campaign in favor of Kamala Harris, who may not personally be a co-conspirator in Biden’s crimes.

     It remains to be seen whether the citizens of Israel can or will similarly purge Netanyahu and company from the state, before he brings it down in a mad quest for empire and pitches the Arab-American Alliance and the Iranian Dominion into direct regional war, and possibly their patrons Russia and America into global nuclear Total War which will surely bring the extinction of our species.

     Already we are seeing the catastrophic effects of dehumanization in Israel; children collecting, trading, and selling Palestinian body parts, organized raids and mass destruction of Palestinian homes and villages by settler militia with IDF support as deniable forces of state terror, pervasive and quasi-official torture and rape of Palestinian prisoners by Israeli soldiers; even the Nazis refused to cross some of these lines we now see violated by Israel, at least officially. Nationalism is a cult of death, and among its many costs is the dehumanization of its own citizens.

     And of course nationalist fascisms of blood, faith, and soil also subvert the rule of law and the institutions of democracy, a parallel goal of fascist tyranny. As Netanyahu consolidates power, Israeli civil society is coming apart at the seems. 

     As written by Bethan McKernan in The Guardian, in an article entitled ‘Deep moral deterioration’ being normalised in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; “The far-right mob attack on two Israel Defense Forces bases in support of soldiers accused of sexually torturing a detainee did not come out of the blue – the parallels to a 2016 incident were immediately obvious.

     In March that year, Elor Azaria, an IDF soldier serving in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron, calmly walked over to Abdel Fattah al-Sharif, an injured Palestinian knife attacker lying on the ground, and shot him in the head. A video of the killing released by a human rights group led to political uproar.

     IDF commanders and many political figures, including the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, condemned Azaria’s actions as a breach of the military’s ethical codes that must be prosecuted. But the right-wing reaction was swift and fierce. Polls suggested that more than half the Israeli public supported Azaria, and protests were held in his defence.

     Both the political and military establishments in Israel have been willing to deny or turn a blind eye to the repeated allegations of torture at Sde Teiman

     Netanyahu, playing to his base, appeared to change his mind: the prime minister went on to criticise his generals for investigating Azaria, and eventually joined calls for the soldier’s pardon. Azaria served nine months of an 14-month sentence for manslaughter, and was released in 2018 to a hero’s welcome.

     A retaliatory rampage carried out by Israeli settlers on the Palestinian town of Huwara in February last year was another grim incident, as are continuing well-documented war crimes such as looting, and the burning of food supplies and homes by IDF soldiers in Gaza.

     But until this week, government ministers had refrained from acts of violence themselves. On Monday, Israeli military police raided Sde Teiman, an IDF base in the Negev desert that has turned into a notorious Guantánamo-like detention centre for Palestinians since the war in Gaza began, arresting nine soldiers suspected of severe torture and sexual abuse of a prisoner.

     The detainee, a member of Hamas’s elite Nukhba unit that carried out the 7 October attack, was admitted to hospital earlier this month and underwent surgery. The hospital is believed to have set off the investigation by following procedures for victims of sexual assault.

     What followed after news of the arrests spread was an astonishing insight into the political currents roiling Israeli society: about 200 right-wing demonstrators, including several members of the Knesset and government ministers, broke into the base in protest at the arrests and only dispersed several hours later after the reported use of teargas.

     Another confrontation then broke out between military police and soldiers, who barricaded themselves inside in solidarity with their arrested colleagues, Israeli media reported. There were also clashes with approximately 300 protesters at a military police base in central Israel, where demonstrators attacked journalists.

     The left-leaning Israeli daily Haaretz described Monday’s events as evidence of a “deep moral deterioration that has developed during the long years of the occupation … along with the loosening of the rules and restraints”.

     Allegations of abuse of Palestinians detained en masse in Gaza and held at Sde Teiman are rife, but Monday’s arrests do not represent a newfound sense of responsibility towards Palestinian prisoners from the Israeli state.

     While the government has said it plans to move Palestinian detainees elsewhere, for now the base is still being used as a holding facility.

     Conditions for Palestinians held in regular Israeli prisons are not much better, and since 7 October Israel has broken international law by refusing to let Red Cross inspectors visit detention facilities.

     Investigations into alleged IDF abuses of Palestinians are vanishingly rare and prosecutions are even rarer. It seems that the only reason an inquiry was launched into this incident is because hospital officials who treated the victim off-base raised the alarm.

     If anything, it seems that heinous violence is becoming increasingly normalised in the latest round of bloodletting in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, set in motion by Hamas’s 7 October attack. A recent UN report has estimated 27 detainees have died in custody on Israeli military bases and at least four more have died in the Israeli prison system from beatings or denial of medical treatment since the war began.

     Both the political and military establishments in Israel have been willing to deny or turn a blind eye to the repeated allegations of torture at Sde Teiman, encouraging brutal treatment of prisoners and reinforcing a culture of impunity.

     A key principle of international law is complementarity, which prevents the international courts of justice at The Hague from pursuing war crimes charges if they are subject to credible state-level investigations or criminal proceedings. Prosecutors there will have noted Monday’s dramatic events in their efforts to determine whether Israel is able – or willing – to investigate itself.

     Israel’s enemies will also be watching, closely following what they see as internal disunity and weakness. The IDF said in a statement on Tuesday that the attacks were damaging to national security and three combat battalions scheduled for deployment to Gaza have instead been diverted to Beit Lid.

     The rioting at the army bases on Monday in defence of soldiers accused of terrible crimes was not the first recent indication of the Israeli right’s diminishing respect for human dignity and the rule of law. It is unlikely to be the last.”

     As I wrote in my post of May 28 2023, The True and False Crows: a Fable; A crow confronts his image in a pool of water, and as Nietzsche warned the darkness looks back. Of this I have written a paragraph on the Nietzschean idea of the Abyss, and of tragedy as failure to embrace our monstrosity and those truths immanent in nature and written in our flesh; the wildness of nature and the wildness of ourselves.

      As Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil goes.; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

      It is also an origin of evil as the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force; written in the tyrannies and systems of unequal power which hold humankind in their iron grip of force and control as Kristevan abjection and learned helplessness, and the ecological catastrophe which threatens our species extinction as disconnection from nature, control of nature as capitalist exploitation of resources and theft of the commons, carceral states of force and control as embodied violence, and our falsification, commodification, and dehumanization through the Wilderness of Mirrors.

     All of this requires the renouncement of love, as Wagner’s figure of tyranny Alberich the Dwarf must do to seize the Ring of power and dominion, a story more familiar to us as Tolkien’s retelling of the Nibelungenlied in his trilogy of novels which recast World War Two as an allegory of the abandonment of addiction to power. This has a corollary; the redemptive power of love, like the power of poetic vision to reimagine and transform ourselves, can free us from the Ring of Power and bring healing to the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     As written by Jean Genet in Miracle of the Rose; “A man must dream a long time in order to act with grandeur, and dreaming is nursed in darkness.”

     Here follows the paragraph of my thoughts on seeing this image, which if considered as a poem I now think of as the True and False Crows: a fable.

     Who is this imposter? If he is me, where now am I? Avaunt, my nemesis, for I shall pursue retribution for this theft of myself beyond all wrath now remembered, through death and hell and the terrors of our nightmares. Come and let us grapple for the truth of ourselves in this place where angels fear, and end not in silence but in exaltation and fire, with roars of defiance hurled against the chasms of our nothingness, supernal and magnificent as the Morningstar, and illuminate for all humankind the path of escape from this prison of illusions and lies. 

     To this my sister replied, Such poetry!

    This is as direct as I can be, o my sister. Should I merit some kind of monument one day, an absurd fantasy as I mean nothing to history and will vanish from the world without a trace, and nothing to anyone beyond yourself as the remnants of family, Dolly as my partner, and those few friends and allies who know my true identity, inscribe this therein.

     I have tried to salvage something of our humanity and to become a fulcrum and change the balance of power in the world these past forty years since I was sworn to the oath of the Resistance by Jean Genet, and often failed, but this is not what is important.

     What is important is to refuse to submit.

     And one thing more; to act with solidarity in revolutionary struggle. As the Oath of the Resistance created in Paris 1940 by Jean Genet from the oath of the Foreign Legion in which he once served, and given to me in Beirut 1982 in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a Last Stand beyond hope of victory or survival, and which I offer to all of you as a tradition to bear forward into the future; “We swear ourselves to each other, to resist and cease not, and abandon not our fellows.”

     In this my chosen life mission I have held true, for if each and every one of us stands in solidarity with others regardless of how different they may be from ourselves, we will become liberators and guarantors of each other’s uniqueness, and in refusal to submit will be victorious and free.

     He said it was the finest thing he ever stole, the Oath of the Resistance, but I often think of this in terms of a definition of the beauty of human beings; to become Unconquered and free as self created beings in refusal to submit to authority and its instruments of violence, force and control, and the repression of dissent, to refuse our dehumanization and the theft of our souls and autonomy and to do all of this in solidarity and absolute loyalty to each other.

    As he once said to me; “Is this not the beauty of men, to resist and never yield, to cede nothing to the enemy, not love nor hope, not our history nor the chance for a future of our own choosing, neither our monstrosity nor our grandeur, nothing of our humanity nor of any human being whose life is in our power to harm or help, to live beyond all limits and all laws and to risk everything to do this for each other?”

    I dream of a future something like the future envisioned by Gene Roddenberry in Star Trek. Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations; the idea first put forth in the episode Is There In Truth No Beauty?, described in the first issue of the fanzine Inside Star Trek as; “that beauty, growth, progress — all result from the union of the unlike. Concord, as much as discord, requires the presence of at least two different notes. The brotherhood of man is an ideal based on learning to delight in our essential differences, as well as learning to recognize our similarities.” As stated in the episode The Savage Curtain; “I am pleased to see that we have differences. May we together become greater than the sum of both of us.”

     Liberty as freedom from authorized identities and truths, and equality and its corollary solidarity; these are the personal and social preconditions of democracy as a free society of equals.

    With all of the horrors I have witnessed in a life lived in the unknown spaces of our maps of becoming human marked Here Be Dragons, beyond the limits of the human and the boundaries of the Forbidden, through wars and revolutions  as a maker of mischief for tyrants and a monster who hunts other monsters for the chance to salvage something of our humanity, though in this I often fail as I did last spring in Mariupol and in the year of the fall of Afghanistan, regardless of the brokenness of the world and the flaws of our humanity, something in us refuses to submit to the abjection and learned helplessness of authoritarian systems and reaches toward exaltation and freedom. Whether such hope is a gift or a curse remains for each of us to discover in how we live our lives.

     In this I speak to you of truths which are immanent in nature and written in our flesh; we must embrace our darkness and claim our truths, and celebrate what Walt Whitman called the songs of ourselves as victorious seizures of power, freedom, and joy.

     Love and desire are innate capacities of reimagination and transformative rebirth, which like Dorothy’s magic ruby slippers cannot be taken from us and bear the power to send us home to our heart’s desire, to restore to us the self  which is truly ours.

      My flesh is a map of private holocausts, written with silent screams, nameless loves, causes lost and won, ephemeral signs of our secret histories and the lies and illusions which capture and distort our images in a wilderness of mirrors and the pathologies of our falsification and disconnectedness.

     We have but one escape from the limits of our flesh and the flags of our skin; and this is love. In love we transcend ourselves and become exalted; through the redemptive power of love we may heal the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

     Love is crucial both to poetic vision and as solidarity in action as processes of self-construal and becoming human; Siegfried walks through the fire and becomes human. There’s a good retelling of it in Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s musical episode, Once More With Feeling; plus it contains a marvelous re-enactment of the myth of Persephone.

     Let us always take the risks of our humanity, and place our lives in the balance with all those whom Frantz Fanon called The Wretched of the Earth; the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased.

     In the end all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

A Crow Confronts His Image

Ring of Power: Symbols and Themes Love Vs. Power in Wagner’s Ring Circle and in Us: A Jungian-Feminist Perspective, Jean Shinoda Bolen

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/451808.Ring_of_Power?ref=nav_sb_ss_2_13

Powers of Horror: an Essay on Abjection, Julia Kristeva

http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/touchyfeelingsmaliciousobjects/Kristevapowersofhorrorabjection.pdf

Miracle of the Rose, Jean Genet

Israel has all but declared war in the Middle East – a conflict it cannot hope to win: The killing of Hamas’s political leader has raised tensions yet again. Only a ceasefire in Gaza offers any prospect of peace

Ismail Haniyeh’s death brings prospect of regional war closer

‘Deep moral deterioration’ being normalised in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/30/deep-moral-deterioration-is-being-normalised-in-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict

Explained: Who is Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas political chief killed in Iran?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/31/who-is-ismail-haniyeh-hamas-political-leader-killed-iran

Humiliation of Haniyeh’s killing creates early crisis for Iran’s new president

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/31/humiliation-of-ismail-haniyeh-killing-may-be-irans-final-push-into-war-with-israel?fbclid=IwY2xjawEXUr1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHfpZHmMl9imQJLRjvNeX833ylmk9h8zluWTp8Bx6ObED2xVmIE27mt6Cww_aem_pvmu4AeCYq3jDJQfqBbXOQ

Netanyahu declares a ‘second war of independence’ as fears for Gazans grow

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/28/netanyahu-declares-a-second-war-of-independence-as-fears-for-gazans-grow

January 5 2023 Netanyahu’s Israel Announces Its Final Solution to the Palestinian Problem

January 29 2024 Where Do We Go From Here? As the Gaza War Becomes A Great Powers Proxy War and a Theatre of World War Three, and the Arab-American Alliance With Our Colony Israel Versus the Iranian Dominion of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen With Their Key Ally Russia Make A Wishbone of the Holy Land

           Final Thoughts

Bury me at sea, for I belong to the world

Send me out in flames, for this is how I have lived

Not silent but incandescent in the night

An agent of change and illumination, like fire itself      

July 30 2024 Anniversary of Victory Portland Day: Antifa’s Historic Defeat of Homeland Security and the Federal Government of the United States

      We celebrate an historic victory which broke the internal siege and occupation of America by a secret army of Homeland Security and destabilized the capture of the state by the Fourth Reich, in which we of Antifa became the only force in modern history to ever defeat the federal government of the United States in battle within its borders, possibly the first such victory since Little Bighorn.

    What is important herein is that it was not elite warriors of any kind who did this; not the Black Bloc stalwarts of liberty and diversity who had for months defended the protests in skirmishes with Trump’s deniable assets of white supremacist terror like the Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Attomwaffen Division, Patriot Prayer, and The Base among other treasonous and despicable criminals, nor the revolutionaries and Abolitionists like myself who bear forward the Torch of Liberty handed us by heroes like John Brown and Harriet Tubman, the Paris Commune and the Abraham Lincoln Brigade of the Spanish Civil War, the Resistance of the Second World War and the original Antifaschistische Aktion founded in 1932 in Germany and Arditi del Popolo founded in Italy in 1921, though these and many other historical forebears continue to inspire, motivate, inform, and shape our Resistance and solidarity of action.

     But no, it was ordinary citizens with no special training or history of liberation struggle who did this, and a stunning demonstration of the power of solidarity and the principle of mass action embodied in the phrase United We Stand. Here the idea of democracy as a free society of equals was tested against state terror and tyranny and its forces of repression of dissent, the idea of citizenship weighed against a carceral state of force and control and the elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege it serves, and against impossible odds the people emerged victorious.

     Victory Portland Day proves that solidarity triumphs over division, love over hate, hope over fear, and that we each of us, anyone, can become Unconquered and free in refusal to submit to authority.

     As I wrote in my post of July 30 2020, A Shot Heard Round the World: Victory Portland; Jubilation and dancing in the streets; join us in celebration of Victory Portland Day as the fascist occupation force of Trump’s secret police concede defeat by the people and begin their withdrawal. This is a moment of tidal change and a shift in the balance of power in America now and throughout the world in the history of humankind and our possible futures to come, for democracy has stood its ground against tyranny, and tyranny has run from us in fear.

     This is a remarkable and absurd triumph of the human will to freedom and refusal to submit to overwhelming force, and to transcend the limits of our flesh and divisions of exclusionary others in solidarity with one another. So few and spectacular are such moments in our history that the memory of them becomes part of our shared identity; Marathon, the Siege of Malta, Washington crossing the Delaware, Gettysburg, the landing at Normandy, and now though on a different scale Portland, which like the shot heard round the world that began the American Revolution in the battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775 created immense and universal consequences which will continue to shape humankind throughout our history as echoes and reflections.

     Here the American people in leaderless and nonviolent mass action have defeated in battle the federal government of the United States and its secret and criminal terror force and army of occupation created for this purpose by Chad Wolf as an arm of Homeland Security and operating in concert with deniable forces of fascist and white supremacist terror. We have emerged victorious from this terror campaign by the carceral state which included the assassination, abduction and torture of protestors by police as well as attempts to disrupt and discredit protests for racial justice throughout our nation through police and deniable asset violence, property destruction and looting, and arson.

      And though the defense of the protesters, of our rights as both citizens and as human beings under international law, and of our nation against fascist subversion saw our heroic Antifa patriots in the front lines of over fifty cities with sustained liberation movements over several months, a role performed on the stage of the world and before the witness of history, and led in Portland by the legendary Rose City Antifa, of which I as the founder of Lilac City Antifa am immensely proud to have stood with in defense of our liberty, it was the people who won this glorious revolutionary struggle for democracy against tyranny.  

    Here in the streets of Portland the most brutal and ruthless psychopaths, fascist zealots, and professional murderers and torturers the federal government could seduce, coerce, or buy, officers who like Hitler’s SS were chosen for their loyalty to the Fourth Reich regime of Our Clown of Terror, Traitor Trump, for sociopathy or capacity for violence without empathy, mercy, or remorse, and for elite combat skills and personal history of mayhem and brutality, and gathered from every military service and police force in the nation, these treasonous and dishonorable thugs, some of whom are fascist infiltrators who have embedded themselves throughout our security services, broke and ran when met with refusal to obey by an unarmed line of march which consisted mostly of women. This was the critical moment when the tide of history was turned from fascist tyranny to a free society of equals and a United Humankind; when the police ran from a protest of students and their moms.

     Two months of ongoing fighting would be necessary before the September 21 surrender by the Fourth Reich Triumvirate of the President of the United States Donald Trump, Attorney General William Barr, and Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf of Portland, Seattle, and New York to the people as Autonomous Zones, with countless crimes against humanity and violations of our rights as citizens by the federal government including the police assassination of Antifa comrade Michael Reinoehl. But the actions of this day in 2020 on the streets of Portland, like Gandhi’s Salt Tax protest, delegitimized the federal government and broke the occupation of cities throughout America.

     We are a free society of equals who are co-owners of our government; such is the definition of democracy. There is no government of any kind which imposes its will on the people through force and control and retains its legitimacy, and in such cases we the people may with just cause withdraw the power we have lent the state. This is the principle of Natural Law on which our nation was founded, a truth immanent in nature, inherent to our being, and written in our flesh.

    There is no just authority.

     A Second American Revolution is playing out in the streets of cities across America, and like the first it is “a shot heard round the world”.  So Emerson described it in his Concord Hymn, which commemorates the fight at the Old North Bridge on April 19, 1775, the first shots fired by American soldiers and the first victory of a terrible war in which ordinary people seized control of their own destiny and founded a nation in which no one is better by right of birth than any other. This is the heart of who we are, we Americans; a people forged in resistance against tyranny and united in the dream of liberty and equality.

     Two centuries and twenty five years after that first American victory we have begun to awaken and remember who we are. And we must cherish and hold high that memory, and never again allow our identity to be stolen from us by a fascist state of white supremacist terror, patriarchal sexual terror, and divisions of exclusionary otherness.

     Today we won the first victory in the struggle for democracy in our time, one which will echo through the darkness of tyrannies and autocracies of state terror everywhere, and find answer among the powerless and the dispossessed, the enslaved and the imprisoned, those whom Frantz Fanon called “the Wretched of the Earth”, and as the poem of a young Jewish girl, Emma Lazarus,  inscribed on our Statue of Liberty declares as the soul of our nation and a beacon of hope to the world, the “huddled masses yearning to be free.”

    Today we have liberated Portland; tomorrow, America and the world.

     As I wrote in my post of May 25 2023, The Anniversary of George Floyd’s Murder and The Meaning of the Black Lives Matter Protests as Revolutionary Struggle; On this anniversary of the police murder of George Floyd, a transformative moment in the Reckoning of our nation with institutional and systemic racism, a discredited and corrupt police state of white supremacist terror and brutal tyranny of force and control, and the legacies of historical inequalities and injustices as a national epigenetic illness of racism and power, we mourn the tragedy of his murder, one incident of racist cruelty and the arrogance of power among countless others, but we also celebrate the triumphant solidarity and refusal to submit of the Black Lives Matter movement which it triggered, and which may yet redeem us with transformative change and a reimagination of our possibilities of becoming human.

    We meet the moment of this anniversary with all its inchoate multiplicities of meaning, shifting and relative truths, bidirectional forces of reaction and resistance, of despair at our powerlessness as victims of the carceral state, systemic racism, and the sacrifice of our nation’s children by the Republican Party on the altar of their power in refusal to confront an epidemic of gun violence and enact reasonable laws to keep weapons of terror, death, and mass destruction out of the hands of madmen and criminals in subservience to organizations of white supremacist terror like the NRA; in the midst of all of this and the epigenetic trauma and shared public grieving of the legacies of historical and systemic racism and the fetishization of violence and of guns as symbols of white male power and privilege we now have also the national trauma of the Robb Elementary School and Buffalo New York mass shootings, but also rage which may transform into action.

     Look at the faces of the victims of gun violence and white supremacist terror. Why did they die?

     They died for the power and wealth of elites for whom their lives are nothing. For this crime there can be no justice, as justice too is owned by those who would enslave us. For the dead we can do nothing; it is the living who must be avenged, and the systemic inequality of our nation and our civilization that must be reimagined and transformed; the business of empire which sacrifices children on the altar of imperial dominion and elite hegemonies of wealth and power wherein the carceral state requires an unchecked and limitless civilian gun market to keep arms manufacturers in business so we are always tooled up to fight vast wars of dominion and defend our markets and control of strategic resources like oil, regardless of the costs of randomly murdered civilians. Indeed this helps the state justify its police forces of occupation and repression of dissent; pervasive gun violence creates fear which the state weaponizes in service to power.

     As Joe Biden said; “As a nation, we have to ask, when in God’s name are we going to stand up to the gun lobby? When in God’s name will we do what we all know in our gut needs to be done?”  

     Regarding solidarity and the total freedom conferred by the act of refusal to submit as Resistance, I have a story to tell you, and a gift to share with you; membership in a tradition of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. Here I offer you the Oath of the Resistance, as it was given to me by Jean Genet in Beirut in 1982.

     During the summer before my senior year of university in San Francisco, I had set out on a culinary Grand Tour of the Mediterranean, learning to cook the food I loved, and was in Beirut when Israel invaded Lebanon and trapped me in a city under siege. Feral bands of soldiers were roaming the streets committing atrocities; one such unit of the Israeli Defense Forces set some children on fire, laughing and making bets on how far they could run screaming before they fell into pools of blackened ruin and their screams became silent. I found myself fighting them; others joined me, we joined whole networks of such groups already fighting, and more joined us; together we united in mass action with a vast and diverse resistance and liberation struggle. From that day forward I was part of the defense of Beirut against the siege.

     A fabulous café that had the best strawberry crepes in the world lay on the far side of a sniper alley, which my friends and I made an extreme sport of dashing across to reach breakfast while the occasional bullet impacted the wall behind us. One day we arrived in our usual high spirits when an elegant gentleman sat at my table, and speaking in French began a conversation with, “I’m told you do this every day, race against death for breakfast.”

     To which I replied, “Moments stolen from death belong to us, and set us free. This is all we truly own and which make us human, such defining moments; memories, stories, histories, identities. Against the terror of our nothingness we have only this with which to find a balance; the truths written in our flesh and the joy of total freedom to discover them. It is a poor man who loves nothing beyond reason and has no pleasures worth dying for.”

    He smiled and said, “I agree”, and so began our conversations at breakfast in the last days before the Fall of Beirut, unforgettable days for this is where he set me on my life’s path.

     There came a day when the barricades were overrun and our neighborhood along with it, one of our last days together. With the streets suddenly filled with Israeli soldiers in a sack of murder and other vileness of terror and inhumanity, ordering people into the streets to surrender and setting fires to burn alive in their homes anyone who refused, and the discovery of our only weapon being the bottle of champagne we had just finished with our strawberry crepes as the building we were in was set on fire, I asked my breakfast companion if he had any ideas. To this he replied with an apologetic shrug and another question, “Fix bayonets?”

     We laughed, and he elaborated; “When all hope is lost, we are free to do impossible things, glorious things.” This advice I find necessary to recall from time to time, and which I recommend to you all.

     Then he asked, “Will you surrender?’

     To which I replied, “No.”

    “Nor I,” he said, standing. “As I share with you now, pass to others at need; this is an oath I devised in 1940 from the one I took as a Legionnaire, for the resistance to the Nazi occupation which friends of mine were forming. It may be the finest thing I ever stole.”

     And so I offer to all of you the Oath of the Resistance as it was given to me by the great Jean Genet in a burning house, in a lost cause, in a time of force and darkness, in a last stand and an act of defiance beyond hope of victory or survival; “We swear our loyalty to each other, who answer tyranny and fascism with Liberty and Equality; to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.”

     To fascism and the idea that some of us are better than others by condition of our birth there can be but one reply; Never Again.

     To all those who hunger to be free, the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, whom Frantz Fanon named The Wretched of the Earth, this I say; you are not alone. 

     Let none stand alone who refuse to submit to the tyranny and terror of force and control, who speak truth to power and question, expose, mock, and challenge authority, who answer division with solidarity, control with disobedience, authorized identities, virtue, and normality with transgression, who run amok and are ungovernable.

     Nor can our souls be stolen from us by either the brutal repression of fear nor the seduction of lies and illusions, we who call the enemy by his true names and stand united in the cause of our liberty, for who refuses to submit and cannot be compelled by force and control becomes Unconquered and free.

     In Resistance we are all, each of us, Living Autonomous Zones. No one speaks or answers for us, nothing is beyond question, and all authority which claims us is without legitimacy or meaning.

     When those who would enslave us come for one of us, let them be met with all of us; let the fascist tyrannies of blood, faith, and soil and the elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege find not a humankind broken by cruelty and state terror nor divided by hierarchies of exclusionary otherness, not hopeless and abject as products of a system of dehumanization, commodification, and falsification, not disempowered by learned helplessness nor conditioned to submit to authority and force, but a humankind united in resistance; an unconquerable and United Humankind.

      For we are many, we are watching, and we are the future.

Gandhi film trailer

World Literature for the Wretched of the Earth: Anticolonial Aesthetics, Postcolonial Politics, by J. Daniel Elam

The Wretched of the Earth, by Frantz Fanon, Jean-Paul Sartre (Preface)

Concord Hymn, by Ralph Waldo Emerson

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45870/concord-hymn

George Washington’s Surprise Attack: A New Look at the Battle That Decided the Fate of America, by Phillip Thomas Tucker

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18210968-george-washington-s-surprise-attack

The New Colossus, by Emma Lazrus

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46550/the-new-colossus

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/portland-federal-officers-leave_n_5f21980fc5b66a5dd6381978

July 29 2024 A Mirror of Our Civilization and Its Perils: Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights

      Madness and vision, the glorious rebellion against Authority which confers freedom and an Unconquered and self created being as a Living Autonomous Zone and agent of change, the consequences of our civilization’s war against nature and the wildness of ourselves, and the dialectics of gender identity; herein I write in celebration of Emily Bronte, on her birthday tomorrow, July 30.

     Why is this important, and why now? Herein we may read the futures we must choose between, as we pass through this Rashomon Gate Event of transformative change, ambiguous and relative truths and ephemeral and shifting meanings, and shape ourselves to the image we want to become as we begin civilizational collapse and catastrophic ecological change from which humankind may never survive, in imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle wherein America balances on the edge of becoming a failed state and throughout the world democracies fall and are succeeded by fascist tyrannies, and the hammer of the Third World War threatens to forge us into aberrant and unrecognizable forms.

    In celebration of the author and her perplexing novel, which continues to provoke impassioned discourse and afright the horses. Emily Bronte saw herself as the Titan Prometheus, cast out of heaven like Milton’s rebel angel, and bearing the stolen fire of the gods. I have always seen in her a kindred spirit, and myself mirrored in her strange and transgressive reimagination of the Bible.

     Wuthering Heights reimagines the mythology of human origins as the awakening and progress from an animal state, much like Djuna Barnes’ Nightwood or Ted Hughes version of Ovid’s Metamorphosis. Like its models Paradise Lost and Frankenstein, Wuthering Heights is both central to the tradition of Romantic Idealism and a critique of it, a dialectical interrogation of the values of Platonic philosophy. Its themes and ideas echo through the works of Iris Murdoch and continue to be relevant after two hundred years. 

      Published a generation after Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein and referential to its themes, with the roles of Victor Frankenstein and his monster transposed to Catherine and Heathcliff and the relational dynamic shifted from parent-child to that of lovers, Wuthering Heights is among the origin texts of feminism.  I recommend it for an introductory course of study on feminism in literature along with Virginia Woolf’s Orlando, Gertrude Stein’s The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, and Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar.

     Sylvia Plath embodied and re-enacted the relationship of Catherine and Heathcliff with Ted Hughes; Ted Hughes cast himself and Sylvia Plath in the roles as Orpheus and Eurydice as a life performance, the myth being Emily Bronte’s primary source in Wuthering Heights, and we can study its actual praxis in their biographies as theatre. Its nuances as a central myth of our civilization can also be seen in its fairytale version, Beauty and the Beast, in the gorgeous film by Jean Cocteau.

    Like Milton in Paradise Lost, Emily Bronte’s secondary sources include the myth of Prometheus in Hesiod’s Theogony, Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound, Plato’s Protagoras, poetic versions of his myth by Goethe and Byron, and the play by Percy Bysshe Shelley.

      My history with this book begins when as a curious twelve year old I asked my mother, “How do people know if they are a boy or a girl? How do we choose?”

       To which she replied, “Everyone is both, of course. Discovering how we like to play the game is one of life’s great adventures.”  And she gave me Wuthering Heights to read.

     Its relevance to my question was not immediately apparent to me.  We may ask, as I did when I first began to read it, “But mom, where is her ax?” To which the answer was, “She has come to redeem and awaken our true nature, not to slay monsters or destroy our cages”.

      With time I came to understand Catherine and Heathcliff as the dual nature of a whole person, in a story of transformative rebirth and the renewal of the world. Only secondarily is the novel about revolutionary political and social change, seizure of power, and freedom from arbitrary categories of being.

      It is a measure of the distance we have come since it was written that my expectation as a young reader was that Heathcliff was obviously of demonic origin, and there would be something like Buffy’s Ax of Slaying somewhere.  

     Plus, written by one of the infamous girls called the Three Weird Sisters in reference to the Fates and to the witches of Shakespeare’s Macbeth, and not about magic? Alas, we await that version of the novel.

     The novel that Emily Bronte wrote is very different. There are at least three stories here, a narrative puzzle box which employs the device of self referential interlocking layers of thematic and narrative structure as if written two hundred years later; the relationships of creative and destructive forces in the universe as reflected and embodied in ourselves and our passions, the origin myth of human emergence from an animal state, and the power dynamics of sex, gender, and identity in male-female relations.

     Heathcliff is a monster, and the story arc foregrounds his redemption through love, but I find interesting the fact that he is a monster who is theriomorphic, based on Emily’s beloved dog, whom she used to batter in psychotic rages and ritualistically provoke into savagery as a proxy of her own wildness. Yet this transgressive and bizarre cross-species relationship, a complex bestiality with its chiaroscuro of sadomasochistic and fetishistic elements, has never been reimagined in literature as the allegorical fable of the limits of the human and our relationship with our own animal nature as the werewolf story it so obviously is.

     Also, the frame story is one of madness and love; it describes a path of return to sanity in a healing process akin to modern psychotherapy practice and referential to Hamlet.  Was the return from madness her own?

     Her novel is a song of the destructive power of love, filled with glorious perversities, seizures of power, pagan rites, but above all of gender relations in which men are brutes who may become human with the intercession of feminine redemption and of the transformational creative power of love.

     Wuthering Heights is a reimagination of Beauty and the Beast and the myth of Orpheus, steeped in archaic scholarship and following a process of initiation suggestive of Jungian shadow work and individuation, as told by a Byronic heroine. I believe she thought of it as her contribution to the storytelling game on the fateful night the world was given Frankenstein, as in the film Gothic. The next story in that game was told by Jeanette Winterson in her novel Frankissstein: A Love Story.

     Who can read the work of Emily Bronte without the meaning of her great novel Wuthering Heights changing with our awareness that its author thought of herself as Victor Frankenstein and as the titan Prometheus cast out of heaven like Milton’s rebel angel? That Heathcliff is her monster, a demon to be united with in an exalted Nietzschean rapture of transformative rebirth? And does this not change one’s reading of her source Frankenstein?

     Above all I celebrate Emily Bronte’s willingness to embrace the darkness, and like a goddess or demiurge to transform us with the creative powers of life and of love from beasts into human beings, an unmaking of Circe’s Swine.

     Things I have learned from Wuthering Heights; be fearless, be free, and own your passion- it is the key to liberation as a self-created being and to the discovery, shaping, and ownership of identity. Love without limits, and embrace its redemptive madness, because it’s the only thing that makes life worth living.

     Thanks, mom.

      Here I turn to the parallel and interdependent text to which it was written in direct replay, Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein.

     What do the figures of Frankenstein and his monster teach us about ourselves and others? Why has Mary Shelly’s reimagination of Romantic Idealism become central to our civilization?

     As I wrote in my post of October 24 2021, Embracing Our Monstrosity: Hierosgamos in Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights; Our monsters, ourselves; genius, madness, inspiration, the quest to become as gods; who among us has not longed to steal the divine fire, to look beyond ourselves, to defy all limits and laws? To be, even for a moment, the unconquered Victor Frankenstein?

     Yet as Prospero said of Caliban, we must also say of Frankenstein’s monster; “This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine.”

     As I have written of Vander Meer’s retelling of Frankenstein in the novel Borne: Mary Shelly’s glorious novel was also about the abandonment of a child who is no longer perfect, among a number of other themes, including the origins of violence.

     A major theme of the novel Frankenstein is the monstrosity of God, who like Victor creates and then abandons his child when it is imperfect and no longer a reflection of his, when we become our own free and independent beings. Yes, Victor wants to become a god, which is why the story resonates with everyone, and is an allegory of the failure of science to realize Idealist visions of humanity, the novel being both a codification and critique of Romantic Idealism.

     But in his quest to become a god, Victor also desires to be worshipped and obeyed; he wants to free himself from subjugation by authority, but not to liberate others. Instead of changing the nature of power, force, and control in casting down from his throne a tyrant god who bound us to his laws and then abandoned us through the abolition of the Law, of the social use of force, and of the centralization of power and authority to an elite as would a true revolutionary, Victor’s tragic flaw of pride compels him to become the next tyrant and enact the role of his former nemesis.

     It is a cycle of substitutive tyranny which as Vladimir Nabokov pointed out in his novel Lolita, a brilliant critique of the failure of Idealism which led to his father’s execution in the Russian Revolution as an aristocrat, has been recapitulated throughout the world in revolutions which become tyrannies, especially under the imposed conditions of anticolonial struggle.

     This week Venezuela is voting on whether to keep or cast down the revolutionary tyranny of Maduro and the legacies of the Chavez regime, and in  its history we may study the real world consequences of the tragedy of Victor Frankenstein on a national scale, and this is far from unique as a consequence of the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle.

     There is a line spoken by the villain in the series The Magicians, a survivor of childhood abuse and tyrant known as The Beast for his horrific crimes, once the powerless and terrified Martin Chatwin and now a monstrous god and underworld king; “You know, when I was a boy, a man who was meant to care for me bent me over his desk and had me over and over every time I was alone with him. It helps me understand a truth. You’re powerful or you’re weak. “

      Here is the original lie of the tyrant and the fascist in the apologetics and self-justification of power; the lie that only power has meaning, that there is no good or evil. How we use power is of equal importance as who holds it. Fear and force are a primary means of human exchange, but not the only means; love, membership, and belonging are as important. The great question which democracy attempts to answer is how to balance the rights and needs of individuals so that none may infringe upon another’s.   

      It’s a line which captures perfectly the inherent contradictions of the  Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force as an origin of evil; for the use of social force is subversive of its own values. Yet the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle often require violence, and until the gods of law and order have been cast down from their thrones I must agree with the famous dictum of Sartre in his 1948 play Dirty Hands, quoted by Frantz Fanon in his 1960 speech Why We Use Violence, and made immortal by Malcolm X; “by any means necessary.”

     As written by Walter Rodney in The Groundings with my Brothers; “We were told that violence in itself is evil, and that, whatever the cause, it is unjustified morally. By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master? By what standards can we equate the violence of blacks who have been oppressed, suppressed, depressed and repressed for four centuries with the violence of white fascists. Violence aimed at the recovery of human dignity and at equality cannot be judged by the same yardstick as violence aimed at maintenance of discrimination and oppression.”

     And here is the passage he references from Leon Trotsky in Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice; “A slave-owner who through cunning and violence shackles a slave in chains, and a slave who through cunning or violence breaks the chains – let not the contemptible eunuchs tell us that they are equals before a court of morality!”

     Yet in reflection I think of those great figures who have been both heroes of liberation and villains of tyranny; Napoleon, Washington, Stalin, Mao, Chavez, Mugabe, the list is a near endless litany of woes and failures of vision wherein Brave New Worlds became hells and carceral states. In evidence I offer as examples of state terror and tyranny the Soviet Union, the Chinese Communist Party, and above all the state of Israel, a dream of refuge forged in the terror of the Holocaust whose victims learned the wrong lessons from the Nazis and assumed their role in the Occupation of Palestine. The dangers of Idealism are very real; but so are the dangers of submission to authority and the complicity of silence in the face of evil.

     I am a hunter of fascists, and mine is a hunter’s morality. For me there is a simple test for the use of force; who holds power?

      All those who hunt monsters must remember always Nietzsche’s warning in Beyond Good and Evil; “He who fights monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes back into thee.”

    I like the character of Victor, and have used variants of this name as aliases because he is a figure of Milton’s rebel angel, but also I admire the monster, a figure of the Shadow based on Caliban in The Tempest. The story is about their relationship as parent and abandoned and damaged child.

      Frankenstein addresses themes of science versus nature, reason versus passion, and both of these within a Promethean rebellion against God, authority, and universal Law as a form of Idealism, and the historical liberation from theocratic tyranny which came with atheism and democracy in the Enlightenment and birthed the American and French Revolutions against Church and Monarchy; this from the perspective of the monster’s creator.

     From the monster’s view, the novel portrays the disfigurement of the soul through abandonment by a parent who also functions as a figure of a creator-god and of Authority, known as the problem of the Deus Absconditus which refers to the god who bound us to his despicable Laws and then ran away before he was caught, and who drives the child to achievement and supremacy as his proxy of success and vindication before the world rather than empowering the child’s own agency to discover and follow a unique bliss and personhood- what the Greeks called Arete or Virtue but also denoting superiority as with the apex predator and ideal of patriarchal masculinity Achilles in the Iliad, one of  Mary Shelly’s sources- in a chosen arena but who like Alberich in Wagner’s Ring must renounce love to win supremacy and power, rendering all victory meaningless and hollow, dehumanizing the child and shaping a vessel of rage and vengeance, a tyrant forged in the violence of the struggle to free himself from enslavement, with the iron self discipline and will to enact subjugation of others in their turn in order to win a space of relative safety and freedom, terrible and pathetic and with the grandeur of a tortured defiant beast trapped in the same flesh as the innocent who needs to be loved and cannot understand why he seems monstrous to others. It is about birthing monsters, and the chaotic plasticity of identity and relationships.

     As written by Octave Mirbeau in The Torture Garden; “Monsters, monsters! But there are no monsters! What you call monsters are superior forms, or forms beyond your understanding. Aren’t the gods monsters? Isn’t a man of genius a monster, like a tiger or a spider, like all individuals who live beyond social lies, in the dazzling and divine immortality of things? Why, I too then-am a monster!”

     So say all revolutionaries who free themselves and others by seizures of power and transgression of the Forbidden, but also all fascist tyrants and elite hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege who claim the right to subjugate us because they are better; Hannibal Lecter, Hitler, and the far too real monster who admires and has modeled himself after both, Donald Trump.

     To be a Nietzschean Superman, beyond good and evil, is a glorious and liberating thing, wherein we break the Great Chain of Being which binds us to a monstrous god and to those who claim to speak in its name as Authorities of faith and state, but when we create ourselves anew, who then shall we become?

     All that matters in the end is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

     A story which is at once Greek tragedy and Freudian study of the process and relations between the id, ego, and superego, with a third parallel storyline relating a Romantic reimagination of Biblical Genesis like that of Blake, it is both the apotheosis of Romantic Idealism and its first criticism, exegesis and classical myth, dialectic on responsibility and discourse on Aristotle’s categories of being, critique of Rousseau’s natural man and of Nietzsche’s Superman which it also inspired in a recursive loop of influence across the seas of time. Its author was a Pythian visionary whose insight reached centuries into the future, and whose immense scholarship reimagined some of the greatest works of our historical civilization. 

     Mary Shelly’s influence echoes through time, multiplies, and reshapes the contexts of its polymorphous meanings. One cannot think of Kafka’s Gregor Samsa without thinking of his original, the dual-aspected monster-child created to bind our nature with reason, nor read her sources and references in the prophecies of William Blake and Milton’s Paradise Lost without reevaluating them in terms of Mary Shelly’s novel; her work resonates through past and future, and what touches, it changes.

      Who can read the work of Emily Bronte without the meaning of her great novel Wuthering Heights changing with our awareness that its author thought of herself as Victor Frankenstein and as the titan Prometheus cast out of heaven like Milton’s rebel angel? That Heathcliff is her monster, a demon to be united with in an exalted Nietzschean rapture of transformative rebirth? And does this not change one’s reading of her source Frankenstein?

     A nested set of puzzle box themes and contexts, multiple narrative threads which create paradoxes of meaning, role reversals and inversions of identities, and the questioning of the mission of civilization and the morality of progress; Mary Shelly created the modern world with her great book Frankenstein.

Wuthering Heights 1992 film starring Juliet Binoche, Sinead O’Connor as Emily Bronte

https://ok.ru/video/2125917063707

Wuthering Heights, by Emily Brontë, Richard J. Dunn (Editor), Charlotte Brontë (Commentary), Robert Heindel (Illustrator)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6185.Wuthering_Heights

Luis Buñuel’s Abismos de pasión, his 1953 film

https://ok.ru/video/2038959573585

Yoshishige Yoshida’s 1988 film Arashi ga oka

Cocteau’s Beauty and the Beast, full movie

https://www.veoh.com/watch/v71672331PdCWgGY2

Gothic:

Lucifer and Chloe medley from the Netflix series to the song Wicked Game cover by Ursine Vulpine & Annanka

Frankissstein: A Love Story, Jeanette Winterson

Nightwood, by Djuna Barnes, Jeanette Winterson (Preface), T.S. Eliot (Introduction)

Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained, by John Milton, Christopher Ricks (Annotations)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/336518.Paradise_Lost_and_Paradise_Regained

Tales from Ovid: 24 Passages from the Metamorphoses, by Ted Hughes (Translator), Ovid

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133951.Tales_from_Ovid

Hesiods Theogony: from Near Eastern Creation Myths to Paradise Lost,

by Stephen Scully

Prometheus Bound & Prometheus Unbound, by Aeschylus, Percy Bysshe Shelley

Leo Strauss on Plato’s “Protagoras”, by Leo Strauss, Robert C. Bartlett (Editor)

The Brontë Cabinet: Three Lives in Nine Objects, by Deborah Lutz

Determining Wuthering Heights: Ideology, Intertexts, Tradition,

by Maria Valero Redondo

The strange cult of Emily Brontë and the ‘hot mess’ of Wuthering Heights

Emily Brontë, by Kathryn Hughes in The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jul/21/emily-bronte-strange-cult-wuthering-heights-romantic-novel

A discussion of Shelly’s Frankenstein

https://m.facebook.com/groups/400522827658573/permalink/997951314582385/

July 28 2024 A History of the Gaza War Thus Far

     When Tel Aviv has not a stone left standing upon a stone, there will be balance for Rafah. This I mourn, for there are no good or bad guys here, no team to heckle or cheer; only a people divided by history and dehumanized by violence, in a holy land become an atrocity exhibit and museum of private holocausts.

     I for one do not want systems of balance, stability, order; for these things serve power and are words for death. I want a dynamically unstable system of life, growth, and rebirth, and the reimagination and transformation of systems of unequal power. Give me a humankind that seeks greater possibilities of becoming human, wherein we exalt one another, embrace and celebrate each other’s uniqueness, and act as guarantors of each other’s universal human rights, not a cult of death.

     Yes, the IDF assassinated someone whom I loved in Rafah, but there is nothing special in this. Merely a sacred wound I bear which opens me to the pain of others on both sides of this war.

     There are no Israelis, no Palestinians; only people like ourselves, and the choices they make about how to be human together.

     Peace be upon us all.

Arabic

28 يوليو 2024 تاريخ حرب غزة حتى الآن

 عندما لا يبقى في تل أبيب حجر على حجر، سيكون هناك توازن لرفح. أنا حزين على هذا، لأنه لا يوجد هنا أشخاص طيبون أو أشرار، ولا يوجد فريق يضايقهم أو يهتف لهم؛ فقط شعب قسمه التاريخ وجرده من إنسانيته بسبب العنف، في أرض مقدسة يصبح معرضًا للفظائع ومتحفًا للمحرقات الخاصة.

أنا شخصياً لا أريد أنظمة التوازن والاستقرار والنظام؛ لأن هذه الأشياء تخدم السلطة وهي كلمات للموت. أريد نظاماً غير مستقر ديناميكياً للحياة والنمو والولادة الجديدة، وإعادة تصور وتحويل أنظمة القوة غير المتكافئة. امنحني بشرية تسعى إلى إمكانيات أعظم لتصبح بشراً، حيث نمجد بعضنا البعض، ونحتضن ونحتفل بتفرد بعضنا البعض، ونعمل كضامنين لحقوق الإنسان العالمية لبعضنا البعض، وليس عبادة الموت.

 نعم، اغتال الجيش الإسرائيلي شخصًا أحببته في رفح، لكن ليس هناك شيء مميز في هذا. مجرد جرح مقدس أحمله ويفتحني على آلام الآخرين على جانبي هذه الحرب.

 لا يوجد إسرائيليون ولا فلسطينيون؛ فقط الأشخاص مثلنا، والخيارات التي يتخذونها حول كيفية أن نكون بشرًا معًا.

 السلام علينا جميعا.

Hebrew

28 ביולי 2024 היסטוריה של מלחמת עזה עד כה

 כשלא תישאר לתל אביב אבן עומדת על אבן, יהיה איזון לרפיח. על זה אני מתאבל, כי אין כאן בחורים טובים או רעים, אין צוות להרגיז או לעודד; רק עם שחולק על ידי היסטוריה ודה-אנושי על ידי אלימות, בארץ קדושה הפך לתערוכת זוועות ומוזיאון לשואות פרטיות.

ני למשל לא רוצה מערכות של איזון, יציבות, סדר; כי הדברים האלה משרתים כוח והם מילים למוות. אני רוצה מערכת לא יציבה דינמית של חיים, צמיחה ולידה מחדש, ודמיון מחדש ושינוי של מערכות של כוח לא שוויוני. תן לי מין אנושי שמחפש אפשרויות גדולות יותר להפוך לאנושיות, שבה אנו מרוממים אחד את השני, מחבקים וחוגגים זה את הייחודיות של זה, ומתפקדים כערבים לזכויות האדם האוניברסליות של זה, לא כת מוות.

 כן, צה”ל רצח מישהו שאהבתי ברפיח, אבל אין בזה שום דבר מיוחד. רק פצע מקודש אני נושא שפותח אותי לכאבם של אחרים משני הצדדים של המלחמה הזו.

 אין ישראלים, אין פלסטינים; רק אנשים כמו עצמנו, והבחירות שהם עושים לגבי איך להיות בני אדם ביחד.

 שלום לכולנו.

June 21 2024 We Balance the Terror of Our Nothingness With the Joy of Total Freedom, the Flaws of Our Humanity With the Redemptive Power of Love, and the Brokenness of the World With Our Absurd Hope For the Limitless Possibilities of Becoming Human: On Sartre’s Birthday, And A Eulogy

June 5 2024 Fifty Seven Years of Occupation, Theocratic State Terror, and Israeli Fascisms of Blood, Faith, and Soil: Anniversary of the Fall of Jerusalem In the 1967 Six Day War

May 24 2024 In the Wake of the great Reckoning For the Crimes of Israel, Recognition of the Sovereignty and Independence of Palestine Raises the Question; Whose Palestine? What Will a Future Palestine and Israel Become?

May 23 2024 International Criminal Court Charges Leaders of Israel and Hamas Equally With Crimes Against Humanity In the Gaza War

May 21 2024 Abjection Despair Horror: Surviving the Terror of Our Nothingness in the Mirror Of Gaza

May 20 2024 The Origins of Evil in Fear, Power, and Force: Existential Questions In the Shadow of the Israeli Genocide of the Palestinians As the World Does Nothing to Silence the Rain of Death

May 19 2024 Is Zionism Fascism? Is Protest Against the Israeli Genocide of the Palestinians Antisemitism and Hate Speech?

May 15 2024 On This 76th Anniversary of Nakba Day, Choose Love Over Hate and Solidarity Over Division

May 14 2024 America Falls With Our Failure of Empathy, Abandonment of Our Universal Human Rights, Cowardice in Confronting Evil, and Complicity in Genocide: Israel’s Rafah Assault Begins

May 12 2024 Shireen Abu Aqla, Martyr in Witness and Journalism as a Sacred Calling in Pursuit of Truth

May 11 2024 Anniversary of the Third Intifada of 2021, Part Two

May 10 2024 Anniversary of the Third Intifada of 2021, Now Ongoing In the Tenth Theatre of World War Three Which Contains and Supersedes the Gaza War

May 4 2024 The Price of Peace: Anniversary of the Kent State Massacre in the Shadow of the Genocide of the Palestinians

April 27 2024 This Passover, Stand Against Genocide. This Passover, Stand With the Children: the Passover Peace and Divestiture Protests and Occupations

April 7 2024 Things Fall Apart: Six Months of War in Gaza

April 6 2024 Israel Is Now An Outlaw Nation: Case of the Consulate Bombing

April 3 2024 Echoes of Guernica in Israel’s Total War: Case of the Aid Worker Bombing

March 19 2024 Israel Unleashes the Third Horseman: Famine in Gaza

February 3 2024 Biden’s Presidential Campaign Becomes a War of Imperial Conquest Against the Dominion of Iran

January 31 2024 Why the Fight For Our Universal Human Rights Is the Same Fight In Gaza and Ukraine: An Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi

January 29 2024 Where Do We Go From Here? As the Gaza War Becomes A Great Powers Proxy War and a Theatre of World War Three, and the Arab-American Alliance With Our Colony Israel Versus the Iranian Dominion of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen With Their Key Ally Russia Make A Wishbone of the Holy Land

January 19 2024 The Trial of Israel and America’s Complicity in Genocide and Other Crimes Against Humanity

January 12 2024 Victorious Red Sea Campaign Globalizes the Gaza War

December 11 2023 What is Hate Speech? What is Anti-Semitism? Who Decides What Is Permitted, and How Shall We Enforce Limits On Each Other’s Freedoms? Case of the Repression of Dissent By Universities Beholden to Special Interest Money

December 8 2023 The Fall of America as a Guarantor of Democracy and Human Rights

November 29 2023 International Day of Solidarity With Palestine

November 22 2023 A Thanksgiving Ceasefire Which Changes Nothing

November 13 2023 A Symbol of Our Imperiled Humanity: al Shifa Hospital

November 4 2023 Stand With Humankind: On Today’s Global Rally For Palestine

October 24 2023 I Stand With Humankind Against Theocratic Tyranny and Terror: the Hamas-Israel War Unfolds As the Sacrifice of Innocents to Power

October 17 2023 Chaos Is the Great Hope of the Powerless: Case of the Hamas-Israel War

October 10 2023 Palestine Versus Israel Round Ad Nauseum In An Endless Litany of Woes, Atrocities, and Horrors

    and a Call to Action: Cori Bush: Why I’m Calling for a Cease-Fire in Gaza, by Cori Bush

https://jacobin.com/2023/10/cori-bush-cease-fire-gaza-war-israel-palestinians

     “We all are grieving at the profound loss of life that has occurred over the past ten days. At least 2,700 Palestinians, 1,400 Israelis, and many Americans have been killed. Tens of thousands of people have been injured. [Editor’s note: Bush delivered this speech on October 16; the current figures are at least 7,400 Palestinians killed, including 3,000 children, and more than 20,000 injured.] Nearly two hundred Israelis are being held hostage. Families have been destroyed, and Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Muslims, are facing unimaginable trauma as they navigate this horrific moment.

Adding to the crisis, the Israeli government has cut off electricity, food, fuel, and internet to Gaza. It has bombed neighborhoods and civilian infrastructure. It has ordered 1.1 million people — including those who are children, elderly, sick, injured, disabled, and pregnant — to leave their homes in northern Gaza, and then bombed them as they evacuated.

Let me be clear: the collective punishment of Palestinians in Gaza is a war crime. With a full-scale invasion of Gaza likely imminent, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of lives hang in the balance — and it’s not only happening right before our eyes, it’s happening with the support and power of the United States government. It’s shameful. In addition to sharing my grief and sorrow, I want to affirm my strong belief that all human life is equally precious. A belief that above all else we must save lives; we must lead with love and solidarity; we must fight against violence and human suffering.

As a pastor, I’m reminded in this moment of Matthew 5:9, which says: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.” This Biblical call to facilitate reconciliation, not violence, could not be any clearer to me. And this responsibility of peacemaking is not conditional. It’s universal.

My beliefs are rooted in my experiences as an activist in the movement to save black lives. Where everyday I marched and protested on the Ferguson front lines — frequently joined by my Jewish and Palestinian siblings, might I add — demanding an end to the violence, brutality, and oppression that is killing black people in America. My commitment to ending violence, brutality, and oppression is not conditional. It’s universal.

My beliefs are also rooted in my experiences as a congresswoman. My commitment to the people of Missouri’s First District has always been to do the absolute most to save lives, starting with those with the greatest need. Over the past week, many of my constituents have called my office, leaving anguished voicemails urging me, urging all of us in Congress, to stop a humanitarian catastrophe in Palestine and Israel right now.

One of the constituent voicemails that plays over and over in my head is from a woman who said, “I’m calling as a Jewish person. Even though I know it’s probably futile, I urge you to continue to advocate for a cease-fire and to advocate for the lives of Gazans.” She then began to weep and hung up in tears. Our empathy and solidarity cannot be conditional. It must be universal.

This is why I’m so proud to be leading this resolution alongside my extraordinary and courageous colleagues today. Because I promised to save lives. Because I see the shared struggles between the people of Ferguson and the people of Palestine, between the people in St Louis and the people in Israel. Because I preach the notability of peace. Because I’m against human rights violations wherever they occur. Because I’m against state-sanctioned violence wherever it happens. Because I want equality, justice, safety, and dignity for everyone. And because I have love for the Israeli and Palestinian people who are suffering because of this violence and the inability of our governments to resolve the root causes of systemic oppression, military occupation, and the crimes of apartheid.

You don’t have to be a pastor, or an activist, or a congressperson to understand the value of human life. You only need to be willing to choose the tougher course of love and peace over the easier path of hatred and violence. You must allow yourself to be consistent in your love and respect for humanity. You must not let yourself turn a blind eye to the mass murder of Palestinians, even as we strongly condemn Hamas for its appalling attack against Israelis. Together, we must work to end the violence in the short and long term.

Violence will never bring us peace. Violence leads to more violence. Together, we must be bold. We must stand on the side of humanity. We must stand on the side of justice. We must stand on the side of equality. We must stand on the side of self-determination. We must stand on the side of love. We must stand on the side of safety. We must stand on the side of peace. And we must be willing to speak out against war and violence — and against our government’s complicity in it.

I have love for the Israeli and Palestinian people who are suffering because of this violence and the inability of our governments to resolve the root causes of systemic oppression, military occupation, and the crimes of apartheid.

In this moment, ask yourselves: Are you for war or against war? Are you for saving lives or against saving lives?

The time to decide is now. Because we need a cease-fire now. We need peace now. The United States government has a responsibility to use every diplomatic tool we have to demand and mediate de-escalation, the safe return of hostages, and accountability for all perpetrators who dare violate international human rights laws.

You know, Dr [Martin Luther] King [Jr] was once denounced for daring to speak out against the Vietnam War. He said: “We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for the victims of our nation and for those it calls ‘enemy,’ for no document from human hands can make these humans any less our brothers.”

To my colleagues in Congress, I urge you to choose humanity. Choose peace. Choose love. Choose courage. Join this resolution now.

I’m so grateful to my colleagues and the advocates, faith leaders, organizers, affected people, and families who are supporting this effort. Know that we will not back down until there is peace. We need a cease-fire now.

Thank you.”

July 27 2024 Kamala Triumphant: Our Future President Answers the Call of the People For a Champion

     We imagine her now as Captain America, Liberty Leading the Revolution, the Statue of Liberty bearing the torch of the Enlightenment to vanquish the dark legacies of our history; theocracy, patriarchy, white supremacy. All these images and more I have seen and shared on social media, as a nation greets her as a savior with rapture and exaltation. Like Anne Hathaway’s White Queen, we have cried to the heavens, Where is my champion? And now, in future President Kamala Harris, we have our answer.

    I hope she will be a President who embodies both Arundati Roy as a truth teller and the Black warrior matriarchs who led the Jamaican Revolt against the British Empire. I’m willing to give her the chance to find that voice, and I now ask the same of all of you.

     Questions remain; if we stand with her, will she stand with us when they come for us, as the enforcers of normality, authorized identities of sex and gender, of race and faith, and of who is an American and who decides, will always do?

     Will she stand with the innocent, regardless of their faith or ethnicity, in both Israel and Palestine and throughout the world?

     Will future President Kamala Harris help us to unite in solidarity and overcome division as guarantors of each other’s rights, and become human together?

      In the ambiguous, relative, and shifting ground of struggle that is identity and politics as how we choose to be human together, is Kamala Harris our liberator or an overseer of the carceral state? And like ourselves, to what degree is she both?

      As I wrote in my post of August 12 2020, Will the Real Kamala Harris Please Stand Up?; Congratulations to the first Indian-African Vice Presidential candidate in American history, and a Progressive whose Senatorial voting record is a near perfect match with Bernie’s. This is a moment of triumph for our nation.

      Yes, she has a history as an overseer of the carceral state who positioned herself as a tough on crime Prosecuting Attorney, but she also nearly knocked Biden out of the race with her devastating personal witness to the effects of segregation and called Biden out on his record as an antibussing collaborator of white supremacy.

     Biden has chosen his own minder in choosing his most effective opponent as a running mate, much as Lincoln formed his cabinet of opponents to create diversity of opinion, a stark contrast to Trump’s echo chamber. I didn’t think him capable of such boldness of vision; this is the first time I’ve ever thought Biden might be a President worth supporting.

     And Kamala Harris, whatever her ideological alignment, is a warrior we can trust to fight to the last and with every available resource, by any means necessary, against the enormous forces of patriarchy and racism which have seized our nation in their fascist Republican dominion and regime of tyranny and terror.

     In defending our interests as an inclusive and diverse society she will be defending her own; this I trust if nothing else. This is why its important to have leaders with skin in the game.

     Yet there remain for me epistemic doubts regarding the historical Kamala Harris, as Richard Whately wrote of Napoleon in 1819. Which one is real?

     The heroic Kamala Harris whose courageous stand on principle against the death penalty and the entire united Democratic and Republican establishment and law enforcement community became a Trial of Saint Joan and a showdown with the powerful Diane Feinstein, a victory in which she won her party over to her side and stopped the institution of state murder?

     Or the Chief Inquisitor who used the power of her office to pursue a campaign of brutality and repression against a vulnerable community, incarcerated lesbian and trans women and LGBT people in general? Considering the centrality of our rights of conscience and bodily autonomy to democracy as a free society of equals, the absolute last thing we want is a state which authorizes identities of sex and gender and polices desire.

     Within each of us lives both Saint Joan and the Chief Inquisitor; a titanic struggle of forces of repression and revolution which has been interrogated by Fyodor Dostoevsky in The Brothers Karamazov, Franz Kafka in The Trial,  George Bernard Shaw in Saint Joan, Alexander Solzhenitsyn in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Arthur Miller in Resurrection Blues, and Manuel Puig in Kiss of the Spider Woman, among others.

     It seems we are fated to watch this conflict played out on the stage of our nation’s history, and to play our parts in it, as the epochal reckoning of racial justice grapples with the armed might of white supremacist and fascist state terror and tyranny.

    Abolition of the death penalty and the criminalization of the LGBT community; these are but two of many conflicted positions and ideologically incoherent actions which are strewn along the path of Kamala Harris to the White House, like breadcrumbs in a fairy tale or Ariadne’s Thread. But do they lead from the lair of a monster she has vanquished as a warning, or to her own lair where she waits in ambush for America?

     We have taken the bait, and we will see.

     In a less hopeful moment, when she first appeared on my horizon and the national stage and in the context of the horrific re-enslavement of Black citizens as prison bond labor and her record as a Prosecutor of Black men on frivolous drug charges which she has subsequently laughed about, I wrote this in my post of December 6 2019, The Failure of Kamala Harris and the Police State; As the chief prosecuting attorney for the state of California, Kamala Harris held a key position in the police state’s reign of terror and racist campaign of genocide against nonwhite Americans, the militarization of our police and the counterinsurgency model of policing which authorizes secrecy, surveillance, and the unlimited use of force against our citizens as if all suspected criminals were terrorists, and the enforcement of the prison bond labor system designed to re-enslave Black people after the Civil War.

     She both used her position to reform a flawed and evil system in her historic confrontation with Diane Feinstein and the power brokers of the Democratic Party which ended capital punishment in California, and collaborated with it as systemic oppression and white supremacist terror. And this bears questioning.

     Is Kamala Harris a traitor to the egalitarian values of America exactly the same as the overseer who kept fellow slaves in line with a whip? Or a liberator who in ending the death penalty has championed us all? And to what degree is she both of these, like all who are human?

    She played an important role in calling out the amoral and despicable patriarch and racist Biden on his record, an act which changed the nature of the Democratic debates and perhaps the direction of our politics forever, and for this historic moment of liberation we must cherish her.

     But we must not allow her or any who claim to speak for us an unexamined mandate.

     Always pay attention to the man behind the curtain.     

     So I wrote of her five years ago in her role as Prosecuting Attorney and overseer of the carceral state, and as a figure comparable to Javert in Les Miserables. But if this is true, it is also true that she used her position as apex predator of an unjust system to infiltrate, subvert, and transform the American justice system, and ended the death penalty in California by her heroic personal stand, a campaign of liberation which could easily have destroyed her but instead catapulted her to greatness and the national arena.

    Humans are never simply good or bad, heroes or villains, white hats or black hats, and never beyond redemption; we are all ambiguities of darkness and light, and in this our flawed humanity Kamala Harris represents us well. Just ask anyone who has ever been undercover in an enemy organization, as I now understand her career in law enforcement as a partial truth balanced with that of a co-opted enforcer of unequal power.

      My understanding of Kamala Harris began to change during the 2020 Vice Presidential debate versus Pence, when I first realized her potential as a champion of women, nonwhite humans, and other precariats of systemic oppression.

     As I wrote in my post of October 8 2020, Kamala Harris Attempts Exorcism of Zombie Slave of Beelzebub Pence; What struck me about the Vice Presidential Debate was Kamala’s image control; eye contact, smiles, empathy statements, and a physical presence and semiotics designed to be nonthreatening, full of sympatico and mother will protect you cues, as contrasted with Pence’s I am zombie daddy fear me grimacing and remoteness.

    Upon reflection I realized that I was witnessing a fairytale; one of a very specific kind, which like that promulgated by Disney in the recent film Maleficent which interrogates the sublimation of  female power to the service of the state and valorizes its seizures of power versus systems of oppression as liberation struggle.

     Tonight we witnessed a cage match between Patriarchy and the equality and autonomy of women, with a sideshow of neo-Confederate racism versus racial justice and equality. And the champions of light and darkness stood in a chiaroscuro of stark figural relief.

     Kamala Harris embodies both my hopes and my fears for America and the future of humankind. I hope Kamala is a cross between Arundhati Roy and the Black Jamaican warrior matriarchs who led the fight against the British Empire. But I fear she may be an overseer of the carceral state.

    Pence is a monster, a zombie and slave of Beelzebub who claimed him before the stage of the world as a rotting and soulless thing, perching on his Harry Potter villain waxy and leering head as Pence mumbled patriarchal Gideonite fundamentalist boilerplate unrelated to any real questions put to him, champion of plutocratic wealth versus humanity, state power versus liberty, white supremacist terror versus equality, and most especially misogyny over the autonomy of women.

     As David Frum writes in The Atlantic; “We saw a vice president with a pale face, his mouth cankered by a cold sore, his eyes pink. He looked unwell, which evoked the pandemic that has gripped America—a pandemic through which the Trump White House has modeled the most irresponsible and unsafe behavior. That irresponsible and unsafe behavior has sickened the president and the first lady, forced the Joint Chiefs of Staff into quarantine, and spread infection though the West Wing. This White House is notorious for non-transparency and untruthfulness. The president evaded a COVID-19 test before the September 29 debate in Cleveland—a date by which he very probably knew he was infected and infectious. Everybody watching tonight’s debate had to wonder: What’s going on with the vice president?

     We saw a vice president who had internalized the Trump White House’s culture of disrespect, and especially disrespect to women. He talked over Kamala Harris and the moderator, Susan Page; he ignored the rules of the debate to which he agreed. At the core of the Trump political project is the reassertion of dominance over the historically dominated by the historically dominant. That reassertion of dominance was Pence’s supreme project at this debate too. Pence did not imitate his boss’s manic and undisciplined—and ultimately catastrophically unsuccessful—style of dominance. Instead, he brought to this debate the more measured and controlled disdain of a man who had considered the matter carefully—and decided that the woman in front of him had no right to control him and that the woman to his right did not deserve to be onstage with him.

     We saw a weird moment when a fly landed on Pence’s snow-white hair—and the vice president did not react at all. No doubt, it’s a conundrum, what to do in such a situation. If Pence had shooed the fly and the fly had refused to shoo, that would have been bad. So he did nothing. And that doing nothing somehow in one powerful visual moment concentrated everything. It symbolized the whole Pence vice presidency, the determined, willful refusal to acknowledge the most blaring and glaring negative realities. Through all of the scandals and the crimes and the disasters of the past four years, Mike Pence was the man who pretended not to notice. And now there was a fly on his head, and he pretended not to notice that too.”

     In this one thing we can be sure; Kamala Harris will never ignore the demon perched on America’s head or the patriarchal and white supremacist legacies of our history. 

     This does not mean that she is any different or better than any one of us, for we all bear the flaws of our humanity and are embedded in systems of oppression and the brokenness of the world. If I react with shock and outrage when our heroes are proven to be no better than ourselves and subject to failures of vision and empathy, it is because on the whole their acts are better than my expectations, and I must always re-evaluate my own ideas on an ongoing basis, especially when things do not fit in the pegboards of my schema and paradigms. Usually when this happens, it is because I have only partial information, in a realm of ideas which are occluded, confused, falsified, relative, and context-dependent. For example, there is the horrible message Kamala gave to the huddled masses yearning to be free at our border; “Do not come.”

     As I wrote in my post of June 9 2021, Overseer of the Carceral State Kamala Harris Proclaims Her Solution to the Humanitarian Refugee Crisis at Our Border; “Do Not Come”; Kamala Harris embodies my hopes and fears for the future of America; I hope she is a cross between Arundati Roy and the Jamaican warrior matriarchs who led the slave rebellion against the British Empire; but I fear she may be an overseer of the carceral state.

    Today my darkest fears have been given new force by her speech to the “huddled masses yearning to be free”, as the poem by a Jewish girl on our Stature of Liberty proclaims. Former Prosecuting Attorney and instrument of law and order, force, fear, and the brutal tyranny of elite wealth and power and hierarchies of racial exclusivity, now wielding the authority of the Vice President of the United States, fails us all and betrays our trust in a stunning message to the world; “do not come”.

     Not the poetic vision of an America which is a beacon of hope to the world, as written by Emma Lazarus;

“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,

With conquering limbs astride from land to land;

Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand

A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame

Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name

Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand

Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command

The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she

With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

      Kamala Harris could have simply quoted the magisterial poem which illuminates America’s historic mandate as a guarantor of universal human rights and the equality of all souls, could have spoken to the fear and pain of the wretched of the earth who have come to us for safety and for liberty, could have offered hope for the flaws of our humanity and the brokenness of the world.

    And this is all the wisdom and empathy she has to offer us from her secret heart; “Do not come.” 

     Is Kamala an apologist of imperialism, abysmally ignorant, or just without moral vision?

     This is an easy charge to lay at her door when I do not live in her skin, know the information she had when making this decision, or the context in which it was made; neither can I excuse failures of empathy and solidarity with human beings who are different from ourselves, for our differences should mean nothing.

     For what purpose have we a border? We have drawn a line in the sand to exploit disparity and create illegal migrant labor; an invisible resource of those with no legal existence to whom we can do anything without reprisal, and whose cheap labor fuels vast industries of agriculture, hospitality, caretaking, and manufacture.

     Migrant labor is slave labor.

     This is the system of wealth, power, and privilege which our chosen champion has refused to challenge, and aligned herself instead with those who would enslave us.

     Yet the betrayal of the people by Kamala Harris is neither the most central nor most sad issue driving the dynamics of elite hegemony and imperial dominion whose flaws can be read in the suffering of the masses at our border, for we ourselves have designed the failures which are their true cause.

     As I wrote in my post of February 18 2020, Guatemala: Our Heart of Darkness;  As we abduct and lockdown refugees in concentration camps and secret prisons, and drive others back into a Mexico whose government is supine before the power of its criminal organizations, we must reflect on the causes of this historic mass migration from Central America’s Dry Corridor of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua; why is this happening, and what can be done to fix the problems which are driving it?

     Drought and famine caused by global warming and climate change are clear immediate causes and triggering stressors of the current migration. These conditions have worsened longstanding issues of endemic poverty and pervasive violence and criminality, legacies of historical colonialism and American imperialist and capitalist policies and interventions, which I have described in my post of September 4 2019; “ There is an interesting connection between the chaos we created in Central America which is driving a mass exodus of immigration to our borders and the conspiracy theory of Islamic replacement of Europeans which inspires our greatest terrorist threat today; many of the white supremacists who ruled Algeria as a colony of France, mainly former Nazi soldiers who joined the Foreign Legion after the end of World War Two, were after its fall in 1962 hired by the government of the United States to rule El Salvador and Guatemala as puppet regimes to protect our corporate profits.

     With them came the same ideology and dream of a homeland and asylum for escaped Nazis, and a secure base of operations and launchpoint for the Fourth Reich, as with those who fled the fall of the colony of Algeria as a white ethnostate to France and blamed Charles de Gaulle for its abandonment, and whose descendants now form the core of Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front.

     Among the direct effects of the secret partnership between America and our former Nazi adversaries include:

     The 1954 seizure of Guatemala by Eisenhower’s CI.A., which replaced a Marxist who had seized land owned by United Fruit and redistributed it to Indian peasants with a furniture salesman from Honduras, Castillo Armas. During the course of this coup America bombed Guatemala City, killed 9,000 communists, disbanded the unions, drove off the squatters, drew up a blacklist of some 70,000 leftists, built death squads and secret prisons, gave torture and brigandage free reign, created an enduring political front, the MLN, and started making a profit from our plantations.

     The 1961 seizure of Guatemala by C.I.A. officer Willauer leading 200 men, a Harvard lawyer who had flown as Chennault’s first officer with the Flying Tigers in China. Guatemala was the staging area for the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Throughout the 1960-63 period of a civil war which continued until 1996, America crushed a pro-Castro rebellion using six C.I.A. bombers, exiled Cuban shock troops, and Green Berets who used the opportunity to test counterinsurgency theories later used in Vietnam.

     The 1974 accession of an officer of Armas named Alarcon to the Presidency of Guatemala, who institutionalized the MLN, declaring “I am a fascist, and I have tried to model my party on the Spanish Falange.”  He was, of course, a C.I.A. agent. Nixon once brought him along on his annual pilgrimage to consult with what he called his spiritual advisor, the infamous Nazi war criminal Josef Mengele.

     The 1982 seizure of power and Presidency of Rios Montt, an evangelical Sunday school teacher and personal friend of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, who suspended the constitution, replaced the courts with secret tribunals, escalated the scorched earth warfare, torture, and disappearances of his predecessors, and one thing more. Here we see the designs of the Christian Identity Gideonite fundamentalists for America and the world given free reign.

     During this the most terrible period of civil war throughout Central America, when Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras were in fact a single nation ruled by remnants of the Nazis we had transplanted from French Algeria as American puppet regimes, and with the full authority of Ronald Reagan, Rios Montt weaponized Protestantism against encroaching Catholic Liberation theology.

     During the 18 months of the Mayan Genocide, in which his death squads killed 3,000 people each month and annihilated 600 villages, he also instituted a system of forced labor in concentration camps modeled on the Apartheid system of South Africa and ruled by terror using former British police and Protestant Orange Militia units hired from Belfast, a mercenary force who had splendidly legal Hong Kong passports courtesy of the Thatcher government.

     During over 35 years of civil war in Guatemala including Rios Montt’s genocidal campaign of ethnic cleansing against the native Indians, about half a million Indians were killed, over one million conscripted into military service and used against their own people, tens of thousands driven into Mexico as refugees, and most of the rest worked to death in the concentration camps. No American Army came to liberate them; they were not white, and no one cared so long as the profits flowed. Guatemala is America’s Belgian Congo; our heart of darkness.

     I think of this every day as I eat my morning banana, for each one is the living form of a silent cry, the ghost of a tear, the memory of atrocity and horror, a thing like many others of fragile beauty and fleeting pleasure won by brutality and the theft of hope, pain and blood and death made manifest. For the dead and for wrongs past I can do nothing; it is the living who must be avenged and the future that must be redeemed. 

     The 1981 founding of ARENA in El Salvador and the 1982-3 Presidency of Roberto D’Aubuisson Arrieta, son of one of the original French Algerian OAS/Afrika Corps legionnaires and immigrants and leader of death squads since 1972, when he was trained at the US School of the Americas, often called a school for war criminals. During the peak of the civil war in 1983-84, about 8,000 people were killed every month in El Salvador.

     The 1963-75 Honduran coup and military dictatorship of Arellano, for whose regime the term Banana Republic was coined, and of course the conduct of the Contra War beginning in 1980, which included the 1984 Honduran invasion of Nicaragua supported by 5,500 American troops.

     Together Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras were ruled for over a generation by America through our puppet tyrants and the ARENA and MLN parties we created. But there is more; much more, of which I will mention only four more brief examples here. 

     The 1964-85 rule of Brazil by the Arena Party and its legacy of torture and state terror which was ended by the total bankruptcy of the nation.

      The 1976 military coup in Argentina and the civil war which followed, during which some 20,000 persons were disappeared. Of our earlier involvements; Peron had been a protégé of Franco and Mussolini, and Evita was assassinated not by us but by Vatican Intelligence with radiation poisoning due to Peron’s campaign against the Church. The Vatican also ran the Swiss escape route used by Otto Skorzeny and other SS officers at the fall of the Third Reich whom we later hired. The most brazen flattery I have ever heard directed toward Oliver North was to compare him to Skorzeny.

     The 1973 assassination of Allende in Chile and support of the Pinochet regime which killed as many as one in every hundred of its citizens.

     Regarding Mexico, we long ago seized Texas and California, drew a line in the sand, and now call aliens everyone on the wrong side of it who comes here to pick the fruit, wash the dishes, and clean the toilets that our own nephews and nieces, children and grandchildren, would laugh in your face at the suggestion they get their hands dirty doing themselves.

    Fascism is a sin of pride whose effects reverberate still, propagating outward in ever-widening circles as a force of contagion like the ripples of a stone cast into a pond. And we are all complicit in it, who call ourselves Americans.

    We must make a better future than we have the past, and offer better solutions than to echo Marie Antionette’s dismissive and fatal reference “Let them eat cakes” in the imperious proclamation “Do not come”.

     So for the darkness of Kamala Harris, who in becoming a Prosecuting Attorney accepted a Faustian bargain with the state, and whose comfortableness in the role of an enforcer of law and order and of a carceral state of force and control made of armed white supremacist police terror, prisons, borders, universal surveillance, and systems of oppression designed to enslave nonwhite populations in service to our elite white male hegemonies of wealth, power, and privilege I am most uncomfortable.

      Now for the light of Kamala Harris, for all human beings are a chiaroscuro of darkness and light in equal measure; she has not remained as she began, and with her growth and change as a champion of liberty and of the powerless, of women and of nonwhite people, my idea of her changed also.

     In the wake of her visit with Netanyahu and his address to Congress as a key ally of Trump and the Party of Treason, she said in a speech; “We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies [in Gaza]. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering and I will not be silent.” This is the first time the voice of the Democratic Party or of America has tacitly admitted our nation’s historical and ongoing complicity in genocide, and it changes forever the narrative. This is both wonderful for our human rights and clever strategically as politics; let the Republicans own genocide as well as racism and theocratic patriarchy. It is also a change in Harris’ position from defender of state tyranny and terror to defender of its victims.

     Why do I revile and abjure the state as embodied violence and its institutions of law and order? Law serves power, order appropriates, and there is no just authority.

     In the end, all that matters is what we do with our fear, and how we use our power.

     As I wrote in my post of August 12 2021, Anniversary of Kamala Harris Becoming a Vice Presidential Candidate; A year ago today something unique in American history happened; in the middle of the Black Lives Matter protests and the battles in our streets against white supremacist terror and police violence, California’s apex predator of the carceral state and most ferociously brilliant law and order attorney was chosen by Biden as his partner in dethroning fascism and the Restoration of America. Kamala Harris placed her life in the balance with those of the powerless and the dispossessed, the silenced and the erased, whom Frantz Fanon called the Wretched of the Earth, at the head of the mass actions against the police and the system she had served, and took her place in history as a figure of Liberty and a symbol of our hope for a better future.

     This I greeted with deep ambivalence, disturbed by her conflicted history and uncertain of her intentions in using the power she had been given in the performance of her new role. Kamala Harris embodies my hopes and fears for the Democratic Party and the future of America; I hope that she is a combination of Arundhati Roy, India’s greatest literary figure and champion of Socialism, and the Jamaican warrior matriarchs who led the fight against the British Empire and birthed the nation which produced the people’s poet Bob Marley, but I fear she may be an overseer of the carceral state.

     A year later I am no closer to resolving this dichotomous image, but the meaning of Kamala Harris as a figure and symbol of racial and gender equality is unambiguous, and this I celebrate as a historic victory.

     We must free ourselves from the shadows of our history and its legacies of epigenetic and systemic inequalities and harms which we drag behind us like an invisible reptilian tail, and emerge as a United Humankind into the light of a brave new world of possibilities.

References

Javert sings This I Swear By the Stars, Les Misérables

Les Misérables, Victor Hugo

Rashomon, film by Akira Kurosawa 

https://ok.ru/video/4578165656154

Rashōmon and Seventeen Other Stories, Ryūnosuke Akutagawa, Jay Rubin Translator), Haruki Murakami (Introduction), Yoshihiro Tatsumi (Illustrator)

Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Bonaparte, Richard Whately

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3723832-historic-doubts-relative-to-napoleon-bonaparte?ref=nav_sb_ss_4_16

The Wretched of the Earth, Frantz Fanon

Arundhati Roy author page on Goodreads

https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/6134.Arundhati_Roy

A monster who protects us from other monsters: the idea of the state as embodied violence in the figure of Maleficent, and of seizures of power from patriarchal systems of oppression in liberation struggle; always an inherent duality, tyranny and liberty, the violence of the slavemaster and the violence of  the slave in breaking his chains

Who will step forward to be our champion? Alice in Wonderland

              Who is Kamala Harris? A reading list

Kiss of the Spider Woman, Manuel Puig

Saint Joan: A Chronicle Play in Six Scenes & an Epilogue, George Bernard Shaw

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/727045.Saint_Joan?ref=nav_sb_ss_2_33

The Brothers Karamazov, Fyodor Dostoevsky

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4934.The_Brothers_Karamazov?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_22

One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17125.One_Day_in_the_Life_of_Ivan_Denisovich?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_38

Resurrection Blues: A Prologue and Two Acts, Arthur Miller

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/179131.Resurrection_Blues?ref=nav_sb_ss_3_18

The Trial: A New Translation Based on the Restored Text (The Schocken Kafka Library) by Franz Kafka

                Kamala Harris’ favorite books; want to understand her and how she imagines, constructs, and performs herself? Read these:

Song of Solomon, by Toni Morrison

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11334.Song_of_Solomon?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_32

Native Son, by Richard Wright

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15622.Native_Son?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_29

The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/77203.The_Kite_Runner?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_36

The Joy Luck Club, by Amy Tan

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7763.The_Joy_Luck_Club?ref=nav_sb_ss_1_30

        Sources and References on the Harris identities as a ground of struggle, conflicted, relational, and changing in the historical forces of the moment, and her meaning as a defining figure and shaping force for our future

‘So uniquely her’: where did Kamala Harris’s self-help speaking style come from?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/25/kamala-harris-speaking-style-memes?CMP=share_btn_url

Kamala Harris’s record as California prosecutor hurt her 2020 campaign. Will 2024 be different?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/24/kamala-harris-california-record-election?CMP=share_btn_url

‘We have arrived!’ What the rise of Kamala Harris and Indian American politicians means for America

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/26/kamala-harris-indian-american-politicians-model-minority-myth?CMP=share_btn_url

Harris navigates Netanyahu visit – podcast

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/audio/2024/jul/26/harris-navigates-netanyahu-visit-and-stance-on-israel-podcast?CMP=share_btn_link

Kamala Harris says ‘I will not be silent’ on suffering in Gaza after Netanyahu talks

Uncommitted voters who protested Biden over Gaza ‘need to see action’ from Harris: Movement that used the Democratic primaries to voice opposition wants more than empathy for Palestinians from the vice-president

Barack Obama endorses Kamala Harris for president in 2024 US election:

Former president’s endorsement means US vice-president has won backing of all the party’s high-profile figures

This Is Who I’d Like to See Fighting for Us for the Next Four Years…, by

MICHAEL MOORE

     “If at any time during the next 102 days you feel like you need a little pick-me-up, or you’ve sunk into an existential crisis wondering “Why am I here knocking on doors when I know this is all hopeless?” or you realize that “all these Quinnipiac polls are bullshit — BUT WHAT IF THEY’RE RIGHT AND WE’RE ALL DOOMED?!” And then your sister calls to say that your brother-in-law has changed his mind and IS, in fact, going to vote for Trump — and, for you, THAT is the final straw. “I’m outta here, I’m moving to Moose Jaw.”

     But, then… all of a sudden, a voice in your head says, “Wait! Hold on… pull up that clip Michael Moore sent you!” And then… you hit play…”

Heather Cox Richardson’s Letters From An American

July 23, 2024

“Vice President Kamala Harris continues her momentum toward the 2024 presidential election since President Joe Biden’s surprise announcement on Sunday that he would not accept the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination.

Today more than 350 national security leaders endorsed Harris for president, noting that if elected president, “she would enter that office with more significant national security experience than the four Presidents prior to President Biden.” As vice president, she “has met with more than 150 world leaders and traveled to 21 countries,” the authors wrote, and they called out her work across the globe from her work strengthening partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region to her historic trip to Africa and her efforts to expand U.S. relationships with nations in the Caribbean and North Central America. In contrast to Harris, the letter said, “Trump is a threat to America’s national security.”

Those signing the letter included former Central Intelligence Agency director Michael Hayden, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, national security advisors Susan Rice and Thomas Donilon, former secretaries of defense Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta, and former secretaries of state Hillary Clinton and John Kerry.

In a New York Times op-ed today, former secretary of state Clinton praised Biden for his “decision to end his campaign,” which she called “as pure an act of patriotism as I have seen in my lifetime.” She went on to say that Vice President Harris “represents a fresh start for American politics,” offering a vision of an America with its best days ahead of it and, rather than “old grievances,” “new solutions.”

Clinton noted that her own political campaigns had seen her burned in effigy, but said, “It is a trap to believe that progress is impossible” and that Americans cannot overcome sexism and racism. After all, she pointed out, voters elected Black American Barack Obama in 2008, and she herself won the popular vote in 2016. “[A]bortion bans and attacks on democracy are galvanizing women voters like never before,” Clinton wrote, and “[w]ith Ms. Harris at the top of the ticket leading the way, this movement may become an unstoppable wave.”

Today, Harris held her first campaign rally, speaking to supporters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where the Republicans held their national convention just last week. The energy from the 3000 people packed into the gym where she walked out to Beyoncé’s song “Freedom” was palpable.

She began by thanking Biden and touting his record, then turned to noting that in her past as a prosecutor, California attorney general, U.S. senator from California, and vice president, she “took on perpetrators of all kinds—predators who abused women, fraudsters who ripped off consumers, cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So,” she said, “hear me when I say: I know Donald Trump’s type.” She went on to remind the audience that Trump ran a for-profit college that scammed students, was found liable for committing sexual abuse, and “was just found guilty of fraud on 34 counts.”

While Trump is relying on “billionaires and big corporations,” she said, “we are running a people-powered campaign” and “will be a people-first presidency.” The Democrats, she said, “believe in a future where every person has the opportunity not just to get by but to get ahead; a future where no child has to grow up in poverty; where every worker has the freedom to join a union; where every person has affordable health care, affordable childcare, and paid family leave. We believe in a future where every senior can retire with dignity.”

“[A]ll of this is to say,” she continued, “Building up the middle class will be a defining goal of my presidency. Because…when our middle class is strong, America is strong.”

In contrast, she said, Trump wants to take the country backward. She warned that he and his Project 2025 will “weaken the middle class,” cutting Social Security and Medicare and giving “tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations,” while “working families foot the bill.” “They intend to end the Affordable Care Act,” she said, “and take us back…to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions…. Remember what that was like? Children with asthma, women who survived breast cancer, grandparents with diabetes. America has tried these failed economic policies before, but we are not going back. We’re not going back.” 

“[O]urs is a fight for the future,” she said “And it is a fight for freedom…. Generations of Americans before us led the fight for freedom.  And now…the baton is in our hands.”  

Meanwhile, MAGA Republicans are still scrambling for a plan of attack against Harris. One of their first angles has been the sexism and racism Clinton predicted, calling her “a DEI hire.” House Republican leaders have told fellow lawmakers to dial back the sexist and racist attacks.”

July 25, 2024

 “Momentum continues to build behind Vice President Kamala Harris to become the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, and the national narrative as a whole has shifted.

Democrats appear to be generating significant enthusiasm among younger Americans. Yesterday, for the first time in their history, the March for Our Lives organization endorsed a presidential candidate: Kamala Harris. Students from the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, organized March for Our Lives after the shooting there in 2018. Executive director Natalie Fall said that the organization “will work to mobilize young people across the country to support Vice President Harris and other down-ballot candidates, with a particular focus on the states and races where we can make up the margin of victory—in Arizona, New York, Michigan, and Florida.”

Andrea Hailey of Vote.org announced that in the 48 hours after President Biden said he would not accept the Democratic nomination, nearly 40,000 people registered to vote. That meant a daily increase in new registrations of almost 700%.

People are turning out for Harris in impressive numbers. In the hours after she launched her campaign, Win With Black Women rallied 44,000 Black women on Zoom and raised $1.6 million. On Monday, around 20,000 Black men rallied to raise $1.2 million. Tonight, challenged to “answer the call,” 164,000 white women joined an event that “broke Zoom” and raised more than $2 million and tens of thousands of new volunteers.

Another significant endorsement for Harris came yesterday from Geoff Duncan, the Republican former lieutenant governor of Georgia, who wrote on social media: “I’m committed to beating Donald Trump. The only vehicle left for me to do that with is the Democratic Party. If that requires me to vote for, speak for, or endorse [Kamala Harris] then count me in!” Duncan’s public announcement offers permission for other Georgia Republicans to make a similar shift. In 1964, South Carolina senator Strom Thurmond similarly paved the way for southern Democrats to vote for Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.

Harris’s appearances are generating such enthusiasm from audiences that when she delivered the keynote address this morning at the convention of the American Federation of Teachers in Houston, Texas, the applause delayed her ability to begin. After a speech defending education and calling out the cuts to it in Project 2025, Harris ended by demonstrating that after decades of Democrats being accused of being anti-American, Trump’s denigration of the country has enabled the party to claim the position of being America’s defenders.

“When we vote, we make our voices heard,” Harris said. “So today, I ask you, AFT, are you ready to make your voices heard? Do we believe in freedom? Do we believe in opportunity? Do we believe in the promise of America? And are we ready to fight for it? And when we fight, we win! God bless you and God bless the United States of America.”

July 26 2024  We Meet Not To Dominate Each Other, But To Master Ourselves: Sports Replace Wars In the Opening Ceremonies of the Olympic Games

The Paris Olympic Games opening ceremonies immerse us in celebrations of human achievement and those who redefine the boundaries of the human, in the nation which birthed the Rights of Man from the millennia of our enslavement and dehumanization by kings and priests, among fabulous beauty and the glorious history of revolutionary struggle.

      Here the city as a set for the games and those who play them and the fandom they represent and champion reflect each other, and which is which is not always clear. Such games are always a forge of identity, and national identity is always a dangerous ground of struggle. But unlike most games, in these arenas with explicitly defined rules anyone who claims a nation through fandom of an athlete or a team may do so without question of belonging or membership.

     No one has ever asked to see my papers while cheering for a team. This is the great hope of our future.

     I wish we in America had such citizenship by declaration; it would solve issues of migrants, refugees, underclasses, if to claim to be an American was to become one. If you’re crazy enough to want to be one of us, who are we to say no?

     This atmosphere of comraderie is euphoric and gathers others in; like fireworks as exploding rainbows within the human heart. Here we witness and perform acts of exaltation of our humanity, rather than the degradation and dehumanization of war. We need such communal rituals, especially now, as vast and implacable myriads of wars engulf our world and we come to the Olympics to huddle against the giants of Old Night and enact rituals by which to dispel war.

      In the Olympic Games we substitute contests of the human ideal in speed, strength, and skill for the dehumanization of war; these games are magic spells and rituals as much as entertainments. Democracy was founded on them, for as Sigmund Freud wrote; ”Civilization was founded by the first man who threw words instead of stones.”

      Systems of oppression divide us, but every four years humankind comes together to reset our civilization in the Olympic Games.

     Many sports have their origins in war, and shape us in ambiguous ways as figures of war and peace, conflict and cooperation, always with the saving grace that no one is harmed when we seek the truth of ourselves as brother warriors in games we agree to play by common rules rather than in battle which has none.

     Our sports are crucial to the construction of personal and national identity, and to democracy which in part evolved from them as formal structures of how to be human together by rules to which we all agree, through cooperation even when we compete within its context.

    Life is pain, but the limits of our form need not define us; we can also define ourselves through struggle against our limits, and bring liberation, change, reimagination and transformation to human being, meaning, and value.

     As I wrote in my post of August 1 2021, Freedom and Revolution as an Art of Fear and Pain: “A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free,” so John Stuart Mill exhorts us in Principles of Political Economy, and I am thinking of this in terms of the imposed conditions of revolutionary struggle and the primary strategic problem of how to delegitimize authority and demonstrate the meaninglessness of its power, how to seize power against impossible odds and in the face of twin threats of force and control, the brutal repression and massive military resources of state tyranny and terror and the pervasive surveillance and thought control of propaganda, lies and illusions which falsify us and steal our souls.

     My father once said to me; ‘Never play someone else’s game. Whoever sets the terms and the rules of a game wins, so this is what you must seize first, and change the rules.” This wisdom was imparted as an observation of the differences between sports of personal combat, which have rules, and combat in war and revolution or anywhere beyond the boundaries of law or games with rules, which has none. In this it is like the distinction between politics and revolutionary struggle.

      The Olympics playing out before us now offer us spectacles of excellence and the limits of human achievement, and I will be watching the fencing competition with great interest as performances which enact metaphors and tactical principles of struggle, a background against which a great theatre of shadow puppets is unfolding in Palestine, Ukraine, and other fronts of World War Three which include America’s elections.

      As my father was a fencing coach, whose right arm was magnificently adorned with scars from actual sword duels, who taught both privately at our home and as a club at our high school where he also taught Forensics, English, and Drama, it was inevitable that I would have participated to some degree, but I loved saber and was reasonably good at it. How I came to discover this, and what it came to mean to me in time, is a story relevant to my understanding of freedom and the art of revolution as its praxis.

       It was the Incident of the Bubble Gum which brought the disciplines of fencing and martial arts into my life, and changed how I was raised and who I became as a scholar and warrior.

      As a nine year old I spent recess at elementary school either playing chess with the Principal in his office, reading in the library, or experimenting with the chemistry set in the lab, which doubtless seemed unfriendly and aloof to the other children whom I failed to play with, as I had not yet learned the necessity of membership. Someone retaliated by putting gum on my seat, which I found insulting and disrespectful, so during the next recess I retaliated by pouring some chemicals in bottles marked with a skull and crossbones down the spigot of the drinking faucet, reasoning that water pressure would let them pool in the u-tube just below so that everyone who went for a drink of water after playing would get a dose. That afternoon half a dozen kids were outside throwing up, and I felt not triumph but horror, because I realized I could have unintentionally killed everyone. I told my father about it that night.

    To this my father replied; “You have discovered politics; this is about fear and power as the basis of human exchange and relationships. Most importantly, it is about the use of force.

     Fear is a good servant and a terrible master; those who use it to subjugate others are motivated by fear themselves, and if you can show them you do not fear them they will be afraid of you, and you can use it as a lever to win dominance. Fear is a ground of struggle. Fear precedes power. So, whose instrument will it be?

     Fear, power, and the use of social force are balanced with the need to belong. Membership, too, is a means of exchange. Sometimes its best to do what others do to fit in, but it isn’t always best, and it can be very wrong.

     Best is to discover what’s best for you, no matter how different that is, and find belonging on your own terms and no one else’s. Even if you have to create that community yourself.

     What you need now is a way to confront people directly when you’re upset with them that doesn’t cause more harm than it solves.”

      So my father described to me Sartrean authenticity and freedom as an escape from the Wagnerian Ring of fear, power, and force as a philosophy of Total Resistance.

      From this time I was engaged in the study of martial arts, fencing, rifle marksmanship, wilderness survival, anything that might give me an edge in the blank spaces of our maps of becoming human where there are no rules, marked Here Be Dragons; I did not know then that I would spend much of my life living where the dragons dwell.

     Martial arts is a vast subject, and I trained in a number of fighting arts, but competitive saber fencing is a game with a very specific set of conditions which are directly relevant to actual combat, because like politics and war it is an Art of Pain and Fear.

      Politics and how we choose to be human together, and the arts of revolution and war as seizures of power when we can no longer hear and speak to one another’s pain and dialog and negotiation finds its limit; these are arts of swallowing pain and metabolizing it as power and freedom.

     To be clear, these are arts of power as intimidation, subjugation, and dominion through inflicting pain, and freedom won through discipline in embracing it. A fencing saber is a semi flexible steel whip with which we inflict pain to establish dominance; fencers run at each other and deliver punishing hits that feel like real cuts, a white hot searing pain so intense it can disrupt consciousness.

      On the first pass I preferred trading hits or counterattack to any defense; why defend and be reactive and controlled when you can teach your enemy to fear you? On the second pass a weak opponent will hesitate, betrayed by his flesh and the fear of remembered pain it holds, and be lost. If he is without fear we meet as equals in the second and third engagements, and the game becomes one of chesslike multilayered strategies, diversion and surprise, timing, precision, and control through continuous assault and patterns of attack and entrapment which set up multi-staged openings by making the opponent react in defense to establish habits and expectations of action as norms and misdirection which one then violates with an unpredictable surprise. Fencing is about the violation of normalities; an art of politics, war, and revolution.

     Arts of deception, change of pattern, the establishment of fatal norms in one’s opponent and their exploitation, all of these kinds of seizure of power, and of discipline; if you are out of alignment by a quarter of an inch, you lose.  

      I love saber because it is primarily a contest of will and only secondarily of skill, in which ferocity in attack and willingness to accept pain to achieve victory are decisive, though guile, deception, concealment of intent, and an ability to think moves ahead of one’s opponent improvisationally in a time-compressed fluid and dynamic situation define greatness in this arena.

     So also with the arts of revolution as both war and political struggle.

     To be beyond control by pain and fear is to be free from the limits of our form and from subjugation by authority, for who cannot be compelled becomes Unconquered. As Jean Genet said to me when we were trapped by soldiers in a burning house, moments before we expected to be burned alive having refused to come out and surrender, “When there is no hope, we are free to do impossible things, glorious things.”

     To once again tell the tale of how Genet set me on my life’s path with the Oath of the Resistance in Beirut during the summer of 1982:

     Israeli soldiers had set fire to the houses on my street, and called for people to come out and surrender. They were blindfolding the children of those who did and using them as human shields.

     We had no other weapon than the empty bottle of champagne we had just finished with our breakfast of strawberry crepes; I asked “Any ideas?”, at which he shrugged and said with an ironic smile; “Fix bayonets?”

     And then he gave me a principle of action by which I have lived for thirty nine years now; “When there is no hope, one is free to do impossible things, glorious things.”

     He asked me if I was going to surrender, and I said no; he smiled and replied, “Nor will I.” And so he swore me to the Oath he devised in 1940 in Paris at the beginning of the Occupation for such friends as he could gather, reworded from the oath he had taken as a Legionnaire. He said it was the finest thing he ever stole; “We swear our loyalty to each other, to resist and yield not, and abandon not our fellows.” So it was that I became the bearer of a tradition now over eighty years old and forged in the most fearsome and terrible conflict the world has ever known, shortly before I expected to be burned alive in the first of many Last Stands.

     This was the moment of my forging, this decision to choose death and pain over subjugation, and ever since being struck by it I have been a bell, ringing. And like the Liberty Bell, I am broken open to the suffering of others and to the flaws of our humanity. This has been the greatest gift I have ever been given, this empathy borne of a sacred wound, and I shall never cease the call to liberty, nor hesitate to answer as I am able the call for solidarity with others.

     It is a principle of action I recommend to you all, for when we eliminate personal survival from our victory conditions, when we accept death and “the many ills to which the flesh is heir” as Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet, as imposed conditions of struggle against overwhelming force and power, authority, and state terror and tyranny, we free ourselves from the limits of our flesh and can turn pain and fear as the means of our enslavement against the tyrants of our dehumanization as forces of liberation and seizure of power. Freud called this death transcendence, and it is a precondition of autonomy in revolutionary struggle as self ownership of identity.

     As Max Stirner said, “Freedom cannot be granted; it must be seized”.

      Let us resist authority whenever it claims us, by any means necessary, and become exalted beyond ourselves in a liberty which cannot be taken from us.

     Forging the Human as Triumph Over the Limits of Our Form:

Watch “La sublime performance de Céline Dion lors de la cérémonie d’ouverture de Paris 2024”

     For those in Paris for the Games, this is my Paris, the best places to stay, eat, and shop:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/hWwJwv6HPvjQzTnK8

Olympic Portraits by Annie Leibovitz https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/406735.Olympic_Portraits

The Games: A Global History of the Olympics by David Goldblatt https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26530353-the-games

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started